6
Glasgow Blatchford Score Blatchford O. Lancet 2000;356:1318–21.

UGIB

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

uGIB rules

Citation preview

Glasgow Blatchford Score

Glasgow Blatchford Score

Blatchford O. Lancet 2000;356:131821.

Schiefer M. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012;24(4):382-7.

Laursen SB. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012;10(10):1130-1135.

AIMS 65 predicts in-hospital mortality in UGIBAIMS65 score superior in predicting inpatient mortality (1ry endpoint)Glasgow Blatchford score superior in predicting blood transfusion (2ry endpoint)Both scores similar in predicting rest of the 2ry endpoints: composite clinical endpoint of inpatient mortality, rebleeding, and endoscopic, radiologic, or surgical intervention; ICU admission; rebleeding; length of stay; timing of endoscopySaltzman JR. Gastrointest Endosc 2011;74(6):1215-24.Hyett BH. Gastrointest Endosc 2013;77(4):551-7.

NG tube???Can rule out UGIB if concern is greater for LGIB (IF bile present)Can clear the fundal poolCan reduce gastric distension and need to vomit (which can worsen GI bleeding)NOT contraindicated if concern for EVMost effective at providing risk stratificationNG tube???Role of ice water lavage has been refuted7-11Unless being used to clear fundal pool, should remove NG tube after lavageRealize that compared to upper endoscopy, the NG tube is:larger in diameterbeing passed blindlyless flexible7 Andrus et al Am J Gastroenterol 82(10):1062-10648 Bryant et al Am J Surg 124(5):570-5729 Gilbert et al Dig Dis Sci 26(12):1065-106810 Moss et al Am J Surg 122(4):565-56611 Rana et al J Assoc Physicians India 38(5):377