Upload
others
View
4
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
UCC and VAT: Two different worlds? Webinar
Nicole Looks | Frankfurt (Moderator) Ana Royuela | Barcelona Mariacristina Scarpa | Milan Eliska Kominkova | Prague
15 February 2017
Agenda
1 Introduction
Overview of main changes of UCC 3
2 Import VAT 6
2.1 Customs Value 7
2.2 Changes due to UCC 8
2.3 Recovery of import VAT 22
3 Impact of UCC on local VAT 31
3 What does the longer-range future hold? 1 Introduction
© 2017 Baker & McKenzie LLP
Introduction: Overview of main changes
4
UCC was adopted in 2013 – Regulation 952/2013
• Framework regulation for customs rules and procedures
• Entered into force on October 30, 2013 (but only to allow negotiations)
• Requires implementing legislation – Delegated Act (DA), Implementing Act (IA), Transitional measures
UCC along with DA and IA applies from May 1, 2016 – Changes will be phased in from May 1, 2016 to December 31, 2020
Since May 1, 2016, Community Customs Code and its implementing provisions are not applicable anymore
© 2017 Baker & McKenzie LLP
Valuation
Authorised Economic Operator (AEO)
Guarantees for special
procedures & temporary
storage (TS)
Customs procedures
Centralized Clearance
& Self-Assessment
Rulings
Overview of main changes
5
3 What does the longer-range future hold? 2 Import VAT
© 2017 Baker & McKenzie LLP
2.1 Customs value
Customs value = Basis for calculation of import VAT
Basic principle:
Customs Value
+ Customs Duties
+ Transportation costs EU border up to destination
Assessment basis for import VAT
Importance for import VAT
7
© 2017 Baker & McKenzie LLP
2.2 Changes due to UCC
8
Wider range of debtors
The debtor of customs duties is liable for import VAT
The UCC stipulates a wider range of customs debtors, e.g.:
Clearance for free circulation: When customs declaration is filed on
basis of information which lead to an underpayment of import duties, the
person who provided the information and who knew, or who ought
reasonably to have known, that information was false (e.g. value,
amount, origin)
Non-compliance with obligations from special procedures or temporary
storage: Any person who was aware (or should reasonably have been
aware) that an obligation under the customs legislation was not fulfilled
and who acted on behalf of the person who was obliged to fulfil the
obligation (e.g. freight agent, centralized customs department acting for
group company)
© 2017 Baker & McKenzie LLP
2.2 Changes due to UCC
Previous legislation:
Both Sale 1 and Sale 2 could constitute a “sale for export”
Using Sale 1, the amount used for customs purposes is 25% lower (and excludes the parent’s costs and margin)
UCC:
Only Sale 2 constitutes a “sale for export”
OEM
(China)
Parent
(US)
EU
retailer
EU
distributor
Sale 1
75
Sale 2
100
Physical delivery
Importer (Declarant) Abolishment of “First Sale”
9
© 2017 Baker & McKenzie LLP
2.2 Changes due to UCC
10
Royalties and licence fees are to be included in the value for customs duty where:
they are a condition of sale of the goods; and
are related to the imported goods
Royalties and license fees | Previous legislation
© 2017 Baker & McKenzie LLP
2.2 Changes due to UCC
11
Royalties payable to a third party will be dutiable where the seller or person related to him requires the buyer to make the royalty payment (Article 160 IPCC)
Royalties and license fees | Previous legislation (2)
‘Related’ also includes ‘control’, Commentary 11 EU Customs Code
Committee
© 2017 Baker & McKenzie LLP
2.2 Changes due to UCC
12
Royalties are deemed to be related to the goods when rights transferred are embodied in the goods
Method of calculation is generally not a factor. If the royalty is basede on the price of the imported goods, it can be asumed that it is related to the goods (same as previous legislation)
Condition of sale has been re-defined – broader (see next slide). Introduction of a catch-up all provision (condition (c) ) – more closely aligned with WCO Commentary 25.1)
Royalties and license fees | UCC (IA)
© 2017 Baker & McKenzie LLP
2.2 Changes due to UCC
Licensor and Manufacturer are not related
Old regulations: royalties / license fees only to be added if Licensor had ‘control’ over Manufacturer
New regulations: always to be added (likely interpretation)
Chinese
Manufacturer U.S. Licensor
EU Importer Trademark rights
Royalty payments
Goods
Royalties and license fees | Case study
13
© 2017 Baker & McKenzie LLP
2.2 Changes due to UCC
Under former legislation EU Member States had discretion to decide when a guarantee was or was not required, but under UCC this has changed:
Mandatory for authorisations to operate certain procedures
Required for potential and actual customs debts
Level of guarantee shall be based on a reference amount and must be
sufficient at all times
Guarantees (1)
14
© 2017 Baker & McKenzie LLP
2.2 Changes due to UCC
Reduced Guarantees and Guarantee Waivers available only
Reduction or Waiver
for potential debts
Reduction for actual debts
e.g. deferment
Where AEOC status
is held or criteria met
Where AEOC is held
Guarantees (2)
15
© 2017 Baker & McKenzie LLP
2.2 Changes due to UCC
Questions:
What is the basis for calculation of Guarantee?
More specific:
Are guarantees also required for import VAT… ?
… or only if import VAT is not recoverable?
Guarantees (3)
16
© 2017 Baker & McKenzie LLP
2.2 Changes due to UCC
17
Under the previous legislation, a guarantee was required in case of deferred payment of import VAT (introduction of goods into a VAT bonded warehouse, import of goods in transit, import tof goods in IC transit, i.e. destined to another EU Member State, etc.). The Customs Authorities could exempt notoriously solvent company from the provision of the guarantee.
The Italian Customs Authorities have issued the form to request the autorization for the new global guarantee. No other official documentation/clarifications of the Customs Authorities have been issued on the guarantee and, in particular, on the amount to be guaranteed.
Guarantees (4) | Country specifics | Italy
© 2017 Baker & McKenzie LLP
2.2 Changes due to UCC
18
According to the guidelines of the German customs authorities no guarantee is required for import VAT if the import VAT is recoverable
Otherwise import VAT it part of calculation basis for guarantee
Guarantees (5) | Country specifics | Germany
© 2017 Baker & McKenzie LLP
2.2 Changes due to UCC
19
Since 01-01-2015, Spanish VAT regulations provides the option to apply VAT deferment upon importation when certain requirements are met:
Being a VAT taxpayer in Spain
Obliged to file monthly VAT assessments (i.e entities registered in
the Monthly Refund Scheme “REDEME “, or annual turnover over
6M €)
According to Spanish VAT Act guarantee is not required when the Importer had applied for VAT deferment option, but guarantee may be required by the tax authorities when arising circumstances recommends to do so.
Guarantees (6) | Country specifics | Spain
© 2017 Baker & McKenzie LLP
2.2 Changes due to UCC
20
Czech Republic
In respect of the Czech Republic, I would highlight 3 aspects:
1. The option not to require the guarantee for the exports/imports not exceeding the of EUR 1,000 on duty given by Art. 89 (9) of UCC is accepted by the Czech authorities.
2. Art. 16 (2) of the Customs Act – “The guarantee provided according to Sec 1 should cover also other monetary compensations that are administrated together with the customs”
3. The guarantee can be provided in form of
(i) cash deposit;
(ii) undertaking of guarantor of financial guarantees; or
(iii) lien on real estate;
Country specifics | UK and Czech Republic
© 2017 Baker & McKenzie LLP
2.2 Changes due to UCC
21
UK
1. Individual guarantees
when you apply to use a special procedure as a one-off on your customs declaration. Not possible to do this more than 3 times in a 12-month period.
to cover 100% of the Customs Duty. There are no reductions or waivers available for these types of guarantees, even for AEOC status.
You can give your guarantee using a:
one-off deed of guarantee
general guarantee account
duty deferment account
2. Customs Comprehensive Guarantee (CCG)
to apply for new customs authorisations or approvals that defer or suspend the payment of duty
if you have a duty deferment account relating to customs duties to defer or suspend the payment of duty
Country specifics | UK and Czech Republic
© 2017 Baker & McKenzie LLP
2.3 Recovery of import VAT
22
Introduction of new case law
1. C-187/14 Skatteministeriet v DSV Road A/S
“Can the first Member State into which the goods were imported refuse the
taxable person designated by the Member State a deduction of the import VAT
pursuant to Article 168(e) of the VAT Directive, where the import VAT is charged
to a carrier of the goods in question who is not the importer and owner of the
goods but has simply transported and been in charge of the customs dispatch of
the consignment as part of its freight forwarding operations, which are subject to
VAT?”
“Article 168(e) of the VAT Directive must be interpreted as not precluding
national legislation which excludes the deduction of VAT on import which the
carrier, who is neither the importer nor the owner of the goods in question and
has merely carried out the transport and customs formalities as part of its
activity as a transporter of freight subject to VAT, is required to pay.”
© 2017 Baker & McKenzie LLP
2.3 Recovery of import VAT
23
Impact of case law on wider range of debtors
Who can be liable under UCC?
The person or organisation who made the customs declaration relating to the goods being imported is liable for the customs debt
An agent in case of indirect representation;
An agent in case of direct representation in particular cases;
In case of non-compliance with the legislation:
any person who was required to fulfil the obligations;
any person who was aware or should reasonably have been aware that an obligation under the customs legislation was not fulfilled and who acted on behalf of the person who was obliged to fulfil the obligation, or who participated in the act which led to the non-fulfilment of the obligation;
any person who acquired or held the goods in question and who was aware or should reasonably have been aware at the time of acquiring or receiving the goods that an obligation under the customs legislation was not fulfilled.
© 2017 Baker & McKenzie LLP
2.3 Recovery of import VAT
24
Impact of case law on wider range of debtors
What does it mean in the light of the case law?
Increased risk for third parties
© 2017 Baker & McKenzie LLP
2.3 Recovery of import VAT
25
Import VAT recovery from the cash flow perspective
Cashflow
advantage
Sweden, Denmark, Czech
Republic, Netherlands, Belgium,
Luxembourg
Cashflow
disadvantage
Italy, Portugal, Germany, France,
Spain, Slovakia, UK
© 2017 Baker & McKenzie LLP
2.3 Recovery of import VAT
26
The proces of import VAT recovery is quite straightforward in the Czech Republic and there has been no changes in connection with the UCC.
The recovery is done
through the VAT return for the VAT registered entities;
Based on the 9th Directive for the EU entities not registered for VAT in
the Czech Republic;
Unrecovarable for non-EU entities not registered for VAT purposes in the
Czech Republic (exept Norway, Makedonia and Switzerland).
Country specifics | Czech Republic
© 2017 Baker & McKenzie LLP
2.3 Recovery of import VAT
27
In the UK, the import VAT is payable upon importation which might lead to cash flow disadvantage;
Possibility to ask for deferral.
Country specifics | UK
© 2017 Baker & McKenzie LLP
2.3 Recovery of import VAT
28
German tax authorities assume that only the party who has “power to dispose of the goods” (e.g. the owner) is entitled to deduct the import VAT.
Therefore, third party service provider are not entitled to deduct import VAT in Germany.
Country specifics | Germany
© 2017 Baker & McKenzie LLP
2.3 Recovery of import VAT
29
Import VAT shall be paid to the Customs upon importation thus generating a cahs flow.
Import VAT amount can then be offset against VAT liabilities as part of the periodical VAT liquidation and any resulting VAT credit can be reported on the annual VAT return to be carried forward or, under specific circumstances, requested for refund.
The VAT refund procedure might be burdersome and cost (guarantee) and time (one year or more) consuming.
The payment of import VAT can be avoided or minimized by so-called “usual exporters”
Country specifics | Italy
© 2017 Baker & McKenzie LLP
2.3 Recovery of import VAT
30
Customs&VAT JOINT Assessment. Customs and VAT refund and
appealing procedures may not be in line
Customs appeal and refund procedures are based in the UCC and
additional customs regulations (art. 116 UCC)
VAT appeal and refund procedures are based in the Spanish General Tax
Act.
Different procedures lead to different deadlines. Risk of filing appeals out of
legal terms
Country specifics | Spain
3 What does the longer-range future hold? 3 Impact of UCC on local VAT
© 2017 Baker & McKenzie LLP
Exporter of record under UCC
32
The “exporter” for customs purposes is in some Member States of relevance for VAT-exempt export supplies.
According to the UCC “exporter” is:
a person who is established in the EU, holds the contract with the consignee in the third country and has the power for determining that the goods are to be brought to a destination outside of the EU, or
in other cases, a person who is established in the EU who has the power for determining that the goods are to be brought to a destination outside of the EU.
Issue: In some scenarios the “exporter” can not be determined, e.g.
both contract parties are established in a third country or
seller is established in EU, however, person who has the power to determine transport to third country destination is not established in EU
© 2017 Baker & McKenzie LLP
Country specifics
33
Spain
Annex A Definition of “EXPORTER OF RECORD”; UCC Guidance document :
Export with Ex Works incoterm:
According to new EOR definition Seller cannot appear as the EOR in this case
Ex works transactions in Spain cannot benefit from VAT exemption on exportation any more
SELLER
(ESP)
BUYER
(NZ)
© 2017 Baker & McKenzie LLP
Country specifics
34
Spain
Annex A Definition of “EXPORTER”; UCC Guidance document:
Supply chain:
When non-EU Seller is not the EOR, it must appoint an indirect representative during the transitional period (Use Box 14)
Indirect Exports for VAT purposes (VAT Directive/112/CE. Art. 146.1.b., Art. 21.2 Spanish VAT Act)
Spanish Regulations on Indirect Exports may not be in line with new UCC Guidance.
SELLER
(ALG)
BUYER
(NZ)
Movements of goods
ESP
Invoice
© 2017 Baker & McKenzie LLP
Country specifics
35
Germany
Internal guidelines of the German customs authorities stipulate the following (contrary to UCC):
If both contract parties are established in a third country, “exporter” is the person who has the power to determine the transport to the third country destination even if established outside of the EU.
If the seller is established in the EU, however, the person who has the power to determine the transport to the third country destination is not established in EU, the seller shall still qualify as “exporter”.
© 2017 Baker & McKenzie LLP
Country specifics
36
Italy
The Italian VAT legislation provides for the so-called indirect exportation under which goods are exported by a supplier established outside Italy.
The new provisions of the UCC on exporter of records will indeed affect the indirect exportations as currently provided whereby the customer is not established in the EU and does not, therefore, have the EORI number to be mandatory reported on the export declaration.
In such a case, the Customs’ Authoritis acknowledged that the EORI number of the Italian supplier, which would appear as the “consignor” of the goods, shall be reported on the export declaration and that the customer shall appoint an indirect customs representative established in the EU who shall carry out the export formalties
© 2017 Baker & McKenzie LLP
Country specifics
37
UK and Czech Republic
There are no specific requirements in the Czech Republic that would differ from the UCC.
There were also no significant changes in the Czech VAT Act in connection with UCC.
In UK, the requirements for the exporter undr UCC applies.
Similarly, as in other countries, in order to be able to export goods, it is necessary to have:
i. EORI - Economic Operator Registration Identification number and
ii. registeration for electronic system – in UK: NES - National Export System for export declarations.
Baker & McKenzie LLP is a member firm of Baker & McKenzie International, a Swiss Verein with member law firms
around the world. In accordance with the common terminology used in professional service organisations, reference to a
"partner" means a person who is a partner, or equivalent, in such a law firm. Similarly, reference to an "office" means an
office of any such law firm. This may qualify as “Attorney Advertising” requiring notice in some jurisdictions. Prior results
do not guarantee a similar outcome.
© 2017 Baker & McKenzie LLP
www.bakermckenzie.com