UBC ENGL 100 Writing Prompt

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/13/2019 UBC ENGL 100 Writing Prompt

    1/2

    Hsu 1

    Writing Prompt #7: Stick in the MudAn Ecological Reading of why Trees Dont Care

    In the mindset of the ecocritic, the tree by Buchanan Tower is an example of almost

    anything but. Planted with the intent for us to aw in its looks, humans often associate trees with

    ideas of beautiful foliage, its industrial properties, and even knowledge. The tree itself however,

    is doubtfully conscious of anything of the sort and grows the way it does, not to service us, but as

    evolution has encouraged it, in the pursuit of sustenance. A nail found in its branch, is without a

    doubt another case of humans misinterpreting the trees purposeto serve them. Its branches

    stretched outwards to conduct photosynthesis through the leaves that grow upon it, are now

    improved upon, with a splinter of steel hammered into it to provide humans with a more secure

    hold. SomeonesInitials, found carved in the rough bark document the human-centric narrative

    of the being there of a visitor long gone, but tell nothing about the tree except that it was once a

    victim of vandalism. Continuing to take ownership of this tree as their property, the maintenance

    of its very life has been seemingly overtaken over by humans to ensure it continues to meet their

    needs, be it shade, imagery or wood. While unnatural to be unable to expand its roots past the

    boundaries of the planter, it is equally unnatural for trees not to have to compete with others for

    survival, as seedlings are not naturally moved from its native soil to be isolated in a bowl of

    concrete where someone deliberately waters, fertilizes and tends to all its essential needs.

    Finally, a plaque can be found at the base of the roots, reciting the human interpretation of how

    this tree came to be. While probably coming into existence when one of hundreds of scattered

    seeds took root in soil after enduring long months, maybe even years of awaiting adequate

    growing conditions, this history is not mentioned at all. Instead the plaque tells of how an

    unrelated species of primate fought amongst themselves, excavated the young sapling, and

    carried it home from its native soils like a hostage. This of course was not the purpose for which

  • 8/13/2019 UBC ENGL 100 Writing Prompt

    2/2

    Hsu 2

    the tree was intended to live out. It did not choose to commemorate a victory it did not win, or to

    honour a side it was indifferent to. A trees purpose in life is not for humans to decide, and so it

    is safe to say its purpose is not to be used as a monument to remember the disputes between

    feuding men. By dedicating this tree to an event of human history, the trees own history is

    ignored. In reality, it does not care about what our history is, in fact, it probably does not even

    know who we are. The only part of this trees primal purpose that seems unchanged by humans

    is its ability to grow rather undisturbed despite being in unfamiliar environment (though it would

    not know it itself). As the tree continues to grow like it is nobodysbusiness, its roots have since

    overgrown the commemorative plaque, rendering it nearly unnoticeable to those whom were

    intended to read it. I would like to say how this can be seen as natures reclaiming of power, that

    the tree is asserting its own history and purpose over that of which was imposed upon it and is

    taking revenge against its human oppressors, but that is doubtful. The tree is a tree, it does not

    know for what the plaque represents, and probably does not even care how it came to be between

    its roots. And so it grows around the human-centric oxidized copper like it would any obstacle.

    We may like to think of this tree in terms of the many uses it provides us with like shade, a war

    memento, something pretty to look at, potential lumber, a living record of past climates

    throughout the years, or even as a fundamental source of oxygen that the survival of countless

    species depend on. But really, the tree knows nothing of what it does for us, cares not of what we

    think of it, and would likely be indifferent if we had died to serve it as plant food. The tree does

    what it does to survive, its purpose is not to meet our needs, it probably does not even know we

    exist.