27
. . . , . .. .-. ._.I .. .:1 . .. .. ' a . . . . > . . ... , . . . . --* . ., .. . .. . . ., ... .. -. . ... I - . . .) .. . . . . ... .. .. ..-.,. . . .: :.l _..... ..-: . . .: . . . . .: .-:I ..-.. . . ... . , ..-.! . ..:I . 'i .. .,._.. ~... ., .. . . - ., _, . .. . - * .i . ._I . ... -.-._. .k% 1 r y U N [TED STATES ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20545 OCT 2 5 1968 bichard E. Cunningham/Cecil R, Bychanan RE PROPOSED RADIOISOTOPE PROCESSING FACILITY - UNITED STATES RADIUM CORPORATION Enclosed are two copies of a preliminary safety analysis'of a radio- isotope processing facility currently being considered by U. s. Radium Corporation as a possible alternate to the one they have previously discussed with us. the site of the existing Bloomsburg facility, and would be considered to be a stop-gap facility pending expansion of the business to a level sufficient to support the more extensive facility previously proposed. Location of the alternate would be on Mr, Orville Olson, a recently acquired employee of U. S. Radium d i s - cussed the proposed facility and his analysis of the health physics aspects, with particular respect to the question of radioactive effluents. He indicated that they would expect little or no aqueous effluents, and the gaseous effluents would contain only tritium, as U. S. Radium plans to discontinue its activities with other isotopes by the end of the year. Messrs. Sorenson and Olson were told that the safety evaluation needed t o be augmented by a consideration of the possible offsite exposures to people resulting from the expected levels of gaseous activity release, and would have to show that these were within the limits implied in paragraph 20.106(e) of Part 20. This question arises in connection with the Bloomsburg facility because of the close proximity of two private residences to the plant boundary. Messrs, Sorenson and Olson were also informed that they should submit the same sort of information regarding this facility as they would have submitted for the previously proposed New Jersey facility. , A. McBride, Director ivision of Materials Licensing Enclosure: SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT (2) cc: L. D. Low, w/o encl. L. R. Rogers, w/o encl.

U N [TED STATES COMMISSION

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

. ... . , . . . . - . . _ . I .. .:1 . . .

. . ' a . . . . > . . . . . ,

. . . . --* . . , .. . . . . . . ,

... . . -. . . . . I - .

. .) .. . . . . ... .. .. ..-.,. . . ..: :.l _..... ..-: . . .: . . . . .: .-:I ..-.. . . ... . , ..-.!

. ..:I . 'i . . .,._.. ~ . . . ., .. . . - ., _ ,

. .. . - * . i . . _ I . ... -.-._.

.k% 1 r y

U N [TED STATES

ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20545

OCT 2 5 1968

b i c h a r d E. Cunningham/Cecil R, Bychanan

RE PROPOSED RADIOISOTOPE PROCESSING FACILITY - UNITED STATES RADIUM CORPORATION

Enclosed a r e two copies of a prel iminary s a f e t y analysis 'of a radio- i so tope processing f a c i l i t y cu r ren t ly being considered by U. s. Radium Corporation as a possible a l t e r n a t e t o the one they have previously discussed w i t h us. the s i t e of the ex i s t ing Bloomsburg f a c i l i t y , and would be considered t o be a stop-gap f a c i l i t y pending expansion of the business t o a level s u f f i c i e n t t o support the more extensive f a c i l i t y previously proposed.

Location of the a l t e r n a t e would be on

M r , Orv i l l e Olson, a recent ly acquired employee of U. S. Radium d i s - cussed the proposed f a c i l i t y and h i s ana lys i s of the hea l th physics aspec ts , with p a r t i c u l a r respect t o t h e ques t ion of r ad ioac t ive e f f luen t s . He indicated tha t they would expect l i t t l e o r no aqueous e f f l u e n t s , and the gaseous e f f luen t s would contain only tritium, as U. S. Radium plans to discontinue i ts a c t i v i t i e s with o the r isotopes by the end of t h e year.

Messrs. Sorenson and Olson were to ld that the sa fe ty eva lua t ion needed t o be augmented by a considerat ion of t h e poss ib le o f f s i t e exposures t o people r e s u l t i n g from the expected l e v e l s of gaseous a c t i v i t y release, and would have t o show tha t these were wi th in the limits implied i n paragraph 20.106(e) of P a r t 20. This ques t ion arises i n connection w i t h the Bloomsburg f a c i l i t y because of the c lose proximity of two p r i v a t e res idences t o the p lan t boundary. Messrs, Sorenson and Olson were also informed that they should submit t he same s o r t of information regarding this f a c i l i t y as they would have submitted f o r the previously proposed New Je r sey f a c i l i t y .

, A. McBride, Director i v i s i o n of Materials Licensing

Enclosure: SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT (2)

cc: L. D. Low, w/o encl . L. R. Rogers, w / o encl.

IN" RO DUCT I O N

T h i s Safe ty Analysis Report describes a f a c i l i t y planned f o r

~ manufacturing t r i t i a t e d metal f o i l s and tritium act iva ted self-luminous

l i g h t tubes. The f a c i l i t y i s t o be located on the United S ta t e s Radiwa

Corporation property a t 4150 O l d Berwick Road, Bloomsburg, Pennsylvania.

w i l l a ssure n for employee occupants i n

. -. , . . . - . . , . . .. . ' . .

' - : ' . ' S ... .- . . : . .

. . . .

---- . - - .. .. . . . .. .. ..... -. . . .. ---. . . . . .. . . ___. . . - . _. _ _ ___ --...--- . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

The primary purpose o

housing for new equipznent t o be used for manufacturing t r i t i a t e d metal

f o i l s and tritium ac t iva t ed l i g h t tubes.

. :

. . . ' . . . ' . * ' . . f . .

.. .

-- , . .

---4-. . . . . .. . . . . . . . -.. . . . .. . ~.. ..~ .. . ..., -I ... .

I

approximately 5000 square fee t ,

o f f i c e area, is a t tached t o t h e building, t h e v e n t i l a t i o n systems f o r

If a non-radioisotope area, e,g. an

t h e r ad ioac t ive and non-radioactive areas w i l l be separate and i s o l a t e d

t i o n system aus t by way o f a

w i l l be located i n t h e cent

r e l e a s e of 1000 c u r i e s of tritium. This compares t o a t o t a l predicted I ~ . -. , -

1125 c u r i e s - itivm sources i n 1968. -

Liquid e f f l u e n t from po ten t i a l ly contaminated sources will be

processed through the ex i s t ing l i q u i d e f f luent disposal f a c i l i t y ,

T h i s f a c i l i t y provides the capabi l i ty f o r removal o f radioisotopes by

evaporation and ion exchangeo Quant i ta t ive d i l u t i o n i s also provided -

. for d i spbsa l of tritium,

S o l i d radfoac t ive waste w i l l be disposed o f by contract wi th a

l i censed f i r m for b u r i a l i n an AEC approved b u r i a l ground.

..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . > . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . - . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..... _ _ . ,

................. -___ ... __ _-__ ~ ~ __._ _____ ____.____ _ _ -_____r__

. . . . .

t h e building, t h e ven3i la t ion system would be separate and i s o l a t e d

the radioisotope processing area by a i r locks. A pressure

Within t h e radioisotope area, t h e v e n t i l a t i q n system w i l l be

designed t o provide s i x (6) a i r changes per hour.

with in the area w i l l be designed t o maintain pos i t i ve flow from hall-

wags i n t o individual rooms and out through t h e exhaust system.

The a i r balance

- .

Vent i la t ion a i r from t he radioisotopes area w i l l not be

r e c i r c u l a t e d.

4

Intake a i r w i l l be passed through dust-stop type f i l t e r s t o

reduce t h e v e n t i l a t i o n a i r dust load.

A system of dampers w i l l be provided in t he ven t i l a t ion ducts such

that a des i rab le bui lding a i r balance can be maintained by rou t ine

j u s t ahead o f t h e main blower(s) which w i l l power t h e building

exhaust system.

followed t o prevent movement of surface contamination out of t h e area.

Rooms i n t he radioisotope area t h a t have a high p robab i l i t y of

sur face contamination w i l l be painted with epoxy type pa in t which

f ac i 1 it at e s de cont aminati on.

and processing.

Contaminated organic l iquids will be absorbed on an absorbent,

then packaged and disposed of as s o l i d waste,

The radiat ion hazard from brehmsstrahlung i s ' n o t a major problem.

I n ~m~a1169, it i s shown t h a t brehmsstrahlung from a t r i t i a t e d

t i tanium.foi1 is 1.8 mrad/hr/Ci a t 10 cm. These ta rge ts have a

nominal 4 curies of tritium with a range of 2 t o 10 curies for

special, orders.

4

_ _ - -- -. - . . .. .____

Airborne r ad ioac t ive e f f l u e n t s - rout ine

~n this evaluation, t h e annual t o l e r a b l e tritium r e l e a s e from a'

s t a c k loca ted a t t h e center of two d i f f e r e n t s ized c i r c u l a r r e s t r i c t e d

a r e a s w a s ca lcu la ted by t h r e e well-known atmospheric d i spers ion .

Bos anque t & Pearson

Turner 1585 4394 Sut t on

Bosanquet & 1310

I

Pearson

Values obtained by t h e Turner and Bosanquet-Pearson methods a r e

considered t o be more accurate than t h e values obtained from Suttonts

equation. An explanation o f the differences involves an ana lys i s of

atEospheric d i spers ion pa ra i e t e r s used i n each equation. Such an

analys is i s beyond t h e scope of: t h i s report . CLU/ i k--6

DIBLE ACCIDZNT

Defin i t ion of maximum credible accident

For t h i s report Maximm Credible Accident i s defined as

which could re lease the grea tes t amount o f tritium t o unrest

the event

>i c t ed

a reas i n . & consecutive hours. For purposes o f th is repor t "Acts of

God" a r e not included i n the evaluations t o determine the maximum

credib le accident. F i r e o r ig ina t ing within t h e bui lding is included

i n t h e determination of max credible accident,

The maximum credible acciden: i n t h i s f a c i l i t y would be t h e r 4

of t h e t o t a l working vol&e o S , t r i t i i m from t he tritium handling . . . , '

equipment. Such an accident could re lease 4000 cu$ies of tritium which

would be car r ied 5y t h e v e n t i l a t i o n exhaust system out through the

exhaust stack.

The f o i l t r i t i a t i n g equipment and the luminous tube f i l l i n g

equipment each have a tritium working volume of 4-000 curies. Under

separa te headings, a discussion o f accident probabi l i ty f o r each

unit is presented,

The rad ia t ion hazard which could be generated i s indicated by the

ca lcu la ted values i n Table. 11. 4

, Atomospheric Wind speed Point of I n t e r e s t )rCi/cc 2.!j.-hr Feet downwind s t a b i l i t y MPH average f rom s t ack

v e r y s t a b l e

very s t a b l e 2 plume center l ine 1 10-3 260

2 plume center l ine 7.8 x 10-4- 320

very s t a b l e 2 maximum ground 3.2 x 10’ 6 8690

s chosen here would occur

t o produce t h e maxlmwn , .

As can be seen ifrom t h e tab le , average weather conditions wi th a l o w , 1 I i wind speed c r e a t e t h e highest ground l e v e l r a d i a t i o n hazard.

Bloomsbyrg area, such conditions a r e extremely unl ikely

wind speed f o r a l l months i s well above 2 miles per_hour,

Local Climatological Data published by Znvironment Science Services

Administration f o r 1967 a t t h e Williamsport, Pennsylvania a i r p o r t shows

a mean .annual wind speed of 8.1 miles an hour,

September had the low mean hourly speed by t h e month.

I n t h e

The average

A review of I

j

July, August and

It was 6.8 miles .

per hour i n each month. Meteorological cond i t ions a t Bloomsburg a r e 8 - very s imi l a r t o those a t Will iunsport because t h e general topography

i s s i m i l a r and t h e r ive r valleys run i n the same general d i rec t ion ,

northwest .

.- 4

Descript ion of equipment

T h i s system cons i s t s bas i ca l ly of an u l t r a high vacum systatl t o

remove t h e a i r f r o m the tubes t o be f i l l e d . A tritium supply sec t ion

wi th a uranium t r i t i d e container a s t h e source of tritium f o r f i l l i n g

the tubes and a high s e n s i t i v i t y bellows type pressure gauge. A "pull-

uranium contaicer t o remove t h e tritium

nused por t ion of t h e tubes t h a t have been

l i n e s connecting t h e pul l iback sec t ion

t i u m 3 s reclaimed by hea t ing t h e urznium

i n g the re leased tritium on t h e uranium 3 '

The system i s a smi-au5omatic Sorption and Ion pumped system that

cons i s t s of t h r e e modules designed t o operate under a s i n g l e exhaust

hood. A c e n t r a l t r i t i u m supply sec t ion and pull-back sec t ion a r e used

f o r a l l t h ree modules.

tubes on' a manifold per cycle.

Each module fills and s e a l s a group of f o r t y

Each module i s expected t o cycle t h r e e

times per shift for a t o t a l of t h r e e hundred and sixty f i l l e d tubes.

The sorp t ion pump absorbs and holds a l l pmped gases w i t h t h e

exception of helium while it is

gases, as they are removed during the r eac t iva t ion o f t h e sorpt ion pump,

a t l i q u i d n i t rogen temperature. The -

* are scrubbed t o rernovp

The i o n pump co c t s and permanently holds a l l pumped

gases,

A single operator 's attendance i s required at each module during

Loading, s t a r t of t h e automatic pumping sequence, t h e duration of t he

fill cycle, t h e s ta r t of t h e sea l ing operations, and t h e s t a r t of the

t h a t i n the

T h e sea l ing o f t h e glass tubes i s accomplished.by focused in f r a red ,

r ad ia t ion ,

emitted by the lamps,

The tubes a r e annealed by the unfocused r ad ia t ion tha t is

A tritium a i r monitor i n s t a l l e d i n t h e hood exhaus% system alerts

t h e opera tor t o any r e l e a s e of tritium, also a t a pre-set l e v e l i n i t i a t e s

t h e emergency pull-back sequence a s previously described.

i s designed t o be f a i l safe,

compressed a i r f a i l u r e , all t h e automatic valves w i l l c loseo Kanual

bypass valves may then be opened t o r e t u r n t h e tritium t o the uranium

container, i f necessaryo

T h e system

I n event of a power f a i l u r e o r a 4

. .

. . . , . . - ---....~...._-I__...._.... . . .~ . . ~

DISCUSSION OF POTEhTTIAL RADIATION HAZARD M OPEFtATIOX O F LUMINOUS TUBE F I L L I N G EQUIP&IENT

Accidental r e l e a s e of tritium from new f i l l system

There 81’8 four possible po in t s of acc identa l r e l e a s e o f tritiuq from

t h e new f i l l system. These a r e l i s t e d i n t h e order o f p robabi l i ty o f

occurrence, the first being the m o s t frequent,

A leak at the g lass t o metal sea l , Our experience i n 3 years

a t this would never

a t this l e v e l

fo ldo There w i l l

i n this sec t ion at l e s s t han . .

chedule of this system

is such that t h e operator must be present while the tritium

is i n this section. It cannot b e v isua l ized how it mould be -

. poss ib l e t o l o s e i n excess of 50 C i w i t h t h e emergency

procedure that w i l l be s e t up,

3 ) - ’ Leaks i n the gas hzndling sec t ion of t h e system,

rate would never exceed 5 mCi per hour wi th a maximum

The r e l ease

diwation of 10 minutes,

4) Operator error. T h i s i s v e q unl ikely t o occur, due t o the

system f a i l safe automation. If an operator o r t h e

automation o f the system fa i l ed , the tritium would e i ther be

contained i n the ion pump o r trapped i n the sorpt ion pmp.

A s p e c i a l emergency procedure ~5.11 be s e t up t o s t r i p tP5.s

absorbed tritium f r o m the sorp t ion pump, i f this should occuro

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. .

. . . . .

. , L-. .

.. -.--*--.7-: ........ . . . . . . . . ....... ....... ....... . . . . . . . ” ............

SCRIPTION O F F O I L T R I T I A T I N G P R O C E S S

Descr ipt ion of equipment

Existing equipment i s described here because design f o r new

equipment has not been establ ished yet.

Metal f o i l s a r e t r i t i a t e d i n a quartz p o t w i th an absolute pressure

em which i s us

ough an o i l

demister, a molecular s ieve t o

furnace t o oxidize gaseous tr i t ium, and through a second molecular s i eve

t o assure capture o f all tritiumc

ove t r i t i a t e d mater, a copper oxide

The coraplete system i s enclosed i n a glovebox which i s exhausted

through a tritium removal t r a i n t o t h e exhaust stack.

Discussion o f Dotent ia l rad ia t ion hazard from ooeration of foil t r i t i a t i n g equipment

The most probable accidental r e l ease o f tritium from this equipment

would be t h e loss of 100 t o 150 cur i e s during an i n i t i a l s t ep i n the

process when a small amount of t r i t i u m i s moved from t h e s torage pots

t o t h e quertz impregnation pot t o t e s t the s y s t m . The r e su l t i ng

concentration i n t h e environment would be .Oh times t h e values i n

.. .' .q .- . . c

I. Table I1 if a l l scrubb3ng of e f f luent tritium a t t h e glovebox f a i l e d ,

I n a new design, the capacity of t h e glovebox e f f l u e n t scrubbing system

would be redesigned t o a capzcfty t o capture tritium leaks a t t he glove-

box o u t l e t port.

j

As was explained under Description - o f Squipment, tritium which i s

flushed from t h e equipment a s an inevi tab le consequence of processing

is czptured by a molecular sieve-copper oxide system.

New equipment would be designed t o provide "tritium capture"

capacity t o reduce t h e r e l ease hazard as much as reasonable cos t w i l l

a1 1 o we

. .. . . . . . . . _. . . . . . . . .. . . . . .- . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . .

..... .:q .._,. ., .. .-&

17

. DXSCRIPTION OF XQUIPKEYT FOR SPECIAL LUMINOUS TUBES

Description of equipment

The d e t a i l s of t h i s equipnenfv have not been developed, It w i l l

f o r development W0i-k and shor t be a srnzll gas f i l l i n g un i t designed

production runs o f special items.

Performance spsc i f ica t ions w i l l r equ i r e t h a t the maximum credib le

acc iden ta l r e l e a s e not came unres t r ic ted a rea concentrations i n

excess of 500 X unres t r ic ted area l i m i t and t h a t t h e most probable

opera t ing accident re lease not cause concentrations i n excess of

u n r e s t r i c t e d area l i m i t s , 4

. . . . . , . i ‘ . .

. . *. . _. -.

i !

I

1 i i i i i t

i j

j

_- I ................... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ’. . . . . . .

18

.,

CONT IhTOUS EFFLUZNT STACK NIOWITORING

Des c r i p ti on of e quipm en%

The ef f luent s t ack m i l l be monitored by a t r a i n of monitors t ha t *

includes a p a r t i c a l a t e f i l t e r , an ion iza t ion chanber, and a water

impinger.

proport ional counter; the water impinger sample v i21 be counted da i ly

i n a l i q u i d s c i n t i l l a t i o n counter; the ion iza t ion chamber output w i l l

be recorded continuously on a char t recorder,

The p a r t i c u l a t e f i l t e r w i l l be counted da i ly i n a

The ion iza t ion chamber w i l l be a 14.8 l i t e r Applied Health Physics

u n i t feeding t h e s igna l t o a Cary 401 v ib ra t ing reed electrometer

which ac t iva t e s

Discussion of e f f luen t s tack monitoring

recordtng pen o'n a Honeywell char t recorder. i ' . .

. .

The eff luent s tack will be monitored continuously - 24 hours a day.

As curren t ly planned, t he monitoring equipment w i l l have a nominal

s e n s i t i v i t y of 1 x low6 pCi/cc f o r tritium i n air. It w i l l . be sampling

a s tack flow a t a loca t ion i n t h e s tack t o produce a r ep resen ta t ive

sample of stack effluent.

An instantaneous alarm sgst em adjustable t o prede temined l e v e l s

w i l l be attached t o the monitoring s y s t m .

1

19 (-3 . ...

Experience has shown that t h e r a t i o of t r i t i u m a c t i v i t y as . r

p a r t i cu la t e , water soluble, and gas i s f a i r l y constant.

theref ore, t o i n t e g r a t e tritium ef f luen t recorded by t h e ion iza t ion

chamber and ca l cu la t e t he t o t a l tritium eff luent from a l l t h ree typeso

It is possible, i

,

.. . . . i ' . .

. . . _ - ' .

. -u

20

ROOM A I R I l lONITORING

Discussion o f room a i r monitoring #

During t h e first few months o f operation i n t h i s f a c l l i t g , it i s

I planned t o do continuous a i r monitoring f o r tritim i n each room of t h e

rad io iso tope a rea by u t i l i z i n g several Johnston Tr i ton un i t s t o provide

a record of tritium l e v e l s and t o provide alarm capabi l i ty . !

i I

Water irnpinger samplers w i l l a l s o be u t i l i z e d extensively f o r i

i ! severa l months t o provide data which can be cmpared w i t h t he T r i t o n

s amp 1 e r da t a. I

i

From the data co l l ec t ed durigg t h e f i rs t several months o f I i

operation, a determination v s i l i ' be made as t o t h e need and design of

a pemianent a i r moni.toring system which would operate from a "house

vacuun" system.

. .

. ..

. . . . . . . . . . .. .. .. , . .. _ _ -_ _. _. . _. ..... r-7 -. . . . .. .

*. ..

v

F'IRX COIJTROL IN RADIOISX'OPZ ARZA

Description o f equipment

An automatic spr inkler system and construction o f t h e building

will, o f course, be designed t o meet applicable l o c a l f i r e cont ro l

codes. I n th i s f a c i l i t y , howevsr, the e f f ec t of automatic spr inkler

spray must be carefu l ly analyzed. F i r s t , it may not be des i rab le t o

spr inkle equipment such as the tube f i l l i n g sys tex because unplanned ,

. closed c i r c u i t s might s e t up an undesirable valving sequence. Some

I

' i f i

Another f a c t o r t o be evalplated .is the e f f e c t of automatic :. sp r ink l ing on s tack eff luent temperature.

is lowered, t h e dispers ion of e f f luent , d i lu t ion f ac to r , i s reduced

s ign i f i can t ly ,

If the s tack e x i t temperature

Se lec t ion o f mater ia l s and procedural cont ro ls w i l l be u t i l i z e d

t o prevent t h e accumulation o f flaxmable ma te r i a l s i n t h e radioisotope

a reao

.. _. , ,. . 7 '. ._ ..._ .. .

22

PZRSOMNEL M O N I T O R I N G PROGRAM

Airborne contamination exposure monitoring

During i n i t i a l operating periods, breathing zone sanples w i i l be.

Once the operation o f a piece of I [

obtained for t h e personnel involved.

equipment i s s t a b i l i z e d , i t i s planned to use s ta t ionary samplers

loca ted i n each room. Currently, it i s planned t o draw a i r from each

work s t a t i o n i n a room t o a cen t r a l room sampler t o ob ta in a da i ly

in t eg ra t ed sample f o r t he roon?.

w i t h t h e program discussed under -- Room A i r Monitoring.

This program would be coordinated

The sampling for personnel mpnitoring would i n i t i a l l y be

by u s e o f Johnston Tr i ton units, and personal water impinger u n i t s o

If t h e i n i t i a l data j u s t i f y the need, a sys ten o f kanne chambers o r

performed 4

t I -

. permanently i n s t a l l e d Johnston Tr i tons w i l l be provided as p a r t o f

a permanent system.

Bioassay program

I n i t i a l l y , d a i l y ur ine samples from each work i n t h s radioisotope

a rea will be analyzed for tritium. Data from t h e d a i l y ur ine sample

program w i l l . b e analyzed to define a pem-anent rout ine tritium

u r i n a l y s i s program,

be requested to submit a minimu.? o f one u r ine sample each work week f o r

tritium anr lgs i s ,

I n any case, a l l radioisotope a rea workers w i l l

. .

.. C

-I Y

Y

I a

/ .ol

- . . . . . . -. - . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , _. . . . . . , . . . . - . . .. .. ._ ._ __

METEOROLOGICAL DATA FOR THE CURRENT YEAR ,

1 2 9 1 1 3

57

1 4 16 13 16 IO 11

6 18 12 11 1 21

120 I88

Normal Eslremes

J 185 .3 A 83.1 5 15.4 0 64.0 N 49.5 D 31.9

YR 60.7 I

61.8 60.0 5218 42.1 32.1 22.9

40.7

73.6 11.6 64.1 53.1 41.1 30.4

100 1966+ 43 1965+ 100 1955 38 1965 102 1953 2 8 1941 91 1951 20 1952 83 1950 1 2 19551 6 5 1966 -15 1950

WILLIAMSPORT, PENNSYLVMIAV R'ILLIAMSPORT AIRPORT '

LATITUDE 41' 15' N LONGITUDE 76" 559 a ELEVATION (ground) 524 Feet 1957

____ ~- Relalive hurnidil y,,'

- -

Monlh

-

> - !: I * ; s

? ! m a :: .?

* ; 7.1 1.2 1.0 6 . 2 619 5.4

7.3 7.6 5.6 7.0 1.1 7.8

-

7.0

Temperature Number of days k _'

Wind -

(Y

8 b

E .c i "

- c - 10 13 15 14 12 11

1 3 14 7 8

12 12

41

t- -

i! F d 4 f! -

1 0 1 2 4 8

9 5 2 2 1 2

31

- mp 'm

1 : ! I -

9 1 4 4 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 1 7

35

- -0 I 2 m dl

I 4 -

8.0 0 .4 1.7 0.1 8.9 6.6

6 .3 5.9 7.1 7.2 8.9 8.2

8.0

I"rt -.

I 1 4 : 4 - 26 26 24

h 2 0

0 0 0 8

18 22

34

- im -

i j - 0 3 1 0 0 0

0 0 0 0

0 a

.

Averages I Extremes Resullanl iunrise lo sunset

--l-T-- It - 5

2 .$ 2 z 3 8 . 6 32 .1 43.4 6 2 . 0 64.5 8 3 . 5

81.2 18.3 15.3 62.4 4 6 . 3 41.1

59.1

-

fn z - 29 40 24 29 32 36

28 21 23 25 33 23

40

rd 3ed: I

a" ._ 31

f-18 5-7 24

6

30 3-29

iAR. i-1

'~ 26 16

JAN F t 8 I l i R

MAY JJN

JUL AUG S t P OCT NUV 0t.C

m a

YEAR

0.83 27-28 3.0 1.3 17.6 4.6 0 . 3 h

1.04 1 2 z j 7 1 2;:: 1 1.60 13-14 0.0 0.0

21 88 8 5 80 80 82 83 66 74 84 81 91 88

97 96 98. 98 91 94 88 90 81 80 81 82

86 86

1.66 28 0.0 0.0 0.97 1-8 0.0 0.0 0.90 28-29 0.0 0.0 2.08 25 0.0 0.0 1.25 2 9.8 4.3 0.75 3 lor4 6.7

5 6.03 12 4.97

109 2.20 406 4-50 807 3.63 913 2-71

6263 43.86

51.3 6 3 . 3 41.2 51.8 29.4 37.9 25.8 33.5

39*4 49*3

i 2.081 OCT. 25 173.0 113.9

NORMALS, MEANS, AND EXTREMES . - ---

Wind ' Relalive humidil

-- - Snow. Sleet Faslesl mile

- -

5 $ L, 2

E s

(bl 1122 1002

856 468 177

24

0 9

111 375 111

1013

-

5936

;{ I Mean number 01 days Precipitation

- L

B - 2 - (b)

2.61 2.51 3.73 3.55 4.08 3.23

4.18 3.62 3.21 3.32 3.45 3.04

t0.65

- (bl

21.4 20.8 28.1 38.6 48.1 57.9

28.8 69 1961 -14 1948 29.2 11 1954 -11 1948 31.4 83 1945 - 1 1961 49.4 91 1960 18 1965+ 60.4 69.2 1102 95 11952 1962+ 1 28 36 11945 1966

10.2 33.5 1964 10.9 25.2 1964 9.4 29.5 1967 1.2 7.9 1961

0.0 0.0 T T 19671

31.6 46.6 60.2

80.5 9.i5 1946 0180 1964 5.74 1951 0.66 1966

8.30 1958 0.99 1955 7.67 1 9 5 5 0.96 1951 6.36 1945 0.50 1964 7.78 1955 0.19 1963 6.49 1948 0.89 1946 5.08 1958 0.84 1955

0.0

JAN.