44
gÁdå ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ J¯Áè E COMM Subject: Mining Lease No. 266 Manganese ore over a Villages, Hosadurga Ta READ : 1. Letter No. DMG Mines and Geolo 2. Government of K 3. Notification date Mines and Geolo 4. Letter No. DMG/ of Mines and Geo PREAMBLE : Director, Department of Mines & recommended for the premature termination Manganese ore over an area of 132.30 hecta Director, Department of Mines & Geology has (a) A Notification dated 31/12 1960 inviting applications hectares in Mallapura vil rejected including that of (b) Subsequently, a prospec area of 74.90 hectares 17/4/1986. The PL holde 187 acres in Mallapura v 4/10/2010 after following opportunities being give mineral. (c) Further, M/s. Vanivilas M limestone, dolomite and ¸ÀA¥À Äl 150 Volume 150 ¨ÉAUÀ¼À ÆgÀ Ä, U Bengaluru, Th (81) ¨s ÁUÀ 1 ªÀ ÄÄRå DzÉ Ã±ÀUÀ¼À Ä ºÁUÀ Æ ¸ÀÄvÉ ÆÛ Ã¯É ªÀ ÄÄ E¯ÁSÉUÀ½UÀ Æ ¸ÀA§A¢ü¹zÀ DzÉ Ã±ÀUÀ¼ÀÄ MERCE AND INDUSTRIES SECRETARIAT 61 granted in favour of Shri R. Praveen Chandra for Iron an area of 132.30 hectares of Ramajjanahalli Kaval and M aluk, Chitradurga District - Regarding premature termination. G/MLS/CEC/2013-14, dated 29/6/2013 from Director, Depart ogy. Karnataka Notification No. Cl 34 MMM 2009 (P), dated 12/10/ ed 31/12/1980 (Gazetted on 8/1/1981) by Director, Depart ogy. /MLS/ML-2661/2013-14, dated 30/8/2013 from Director, Dep ology. Geology vide letter dated 29/6/2012 read at (1) and 30/8/ n of Mining Lease No. 2661 granted in favour of Shri R. Prav ares of Rarnajjanahalli Kaval and Mallapura Villages, Hosadur s furnished the details as follows: 12/1980 (Gazetted on 8/1/1981), read at (3) above, was u/r 58 s for mining manganese ore (at serial number 4 of the notific llage, Hosadurga taluk, Chitradurga district. Four application one Shri E. Rama Murthy. cting licence (PL) No. 3257 was sanctioned to one Shri D. Sri in Mallapura village, Hosadurga taluk, Chitradurga district er had filed a mining lease application in No. 82 AML 1987 o village, Hosadurga taluk, Chitradurga district for limestone, b g due procedure as the licensee failed to furnish requisite en and also the mineral applied for was limestone whereas Mines & Minerals had made an application on 26/4/2002 lime kankar over an area of 100 acres in survey number ÄgÀ ĪÁgÀ, d£ÀªÀj 22, 2015 À iÁWÀ 2, ±ÀPÀ ªÀµÀð 193 hursday, January 22, 2015 (Magha 2, Shaka Varsha 1 ÄAvÁzÀ ore and Mallapura tment of /2010. tment of partment /2013 read at (4) above, has veen Chandra for Iron ore and rga Taluk, Chitradurga District. 8 of Mineral Concession Rules, cation) over an area of 132.30 ns were received and all were ikantaiah for limestone over on for a period of 2 years from on 18/4/1987 over an extent of but the same was rejected on particulars is spite of several s notification was for different for grant of mining lease for 8 and 9 of Mallapura Village, 36) 1936) ¸ÀAaPÉ 4 Issue 4

¨ÁUÀ 1 - KarPage-81-124).pdf · 22/01/2015  · (e) Shri E. Rama Murthy had submitted a revised sketch on 31/5/2002 reducing the area to an extent of 380 acres. It was found that

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: ¨ÁUÀ 1 - KarPage-81-124).pdf · 22/01/2015  · (e) Shri E. Rama Murthy had submitted a revised sketch on 31/5/2002 reducing the area to an extent of 380 acres. It was found that

gÁdå ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ ªÀÄÄRå DzÉñÀUÀ¼ÀÄ ºÁUÀÆ ¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯É ªÀÄÄAvÁzÀ J¯Áè E¯ÁSÉUÀ½UÀÆ ¸ÀA§A¢ü¹zÀ DzÉñÀUÀ¼ÀÄ

COMMERCE AND INDUSTRIES SECRETARIAT

Subject: Mining Lease No. 2661 granted in favour of Shri R. Praveen Chandra for Iron ore and

Manganese ore over an area of 132.30 hectares of Ramajjanahalli Kaval and Mallapura

Villages, Hosadurga Taluk, Chitradurga District

READ :

1. Letter No. DMG/MLS/CEC/2013

Mines and Geology

2. Government of Karnataka Notification No

3. Notification dated 31/12/1980 (Gazetted on 8/1/1981) by Director,

Mines and Geology.

4. Letter No. DMG/MLS/ML

of Mines and Geology

PREAMBLE :

Director, Department of Mines & Geology vide letter dated 29/6/2012 read at (1) and 30/8/2013 read at (4) above, has

recommended for the premature termination of Mining Lease No. 2661 granted in favour of Shri

Manganese ore over an area of 132.30 hectares of Rarnajjanahalli Kaval and Mallapura Villages, Hosadurga Taluk, Chitradurga D

Director, Department of Mines & Geology has furnished the details as follows:

(a) A Notification dated 31/12/1980 (Gazetted on 8/1/1981), read at (3) above, was u/r 58 of Mineral Concession Rules,

1960 inviting applications for mining manganese ore (at serial number 4 of the notification) over an area of 132.30

hectares in Mallapura vill

rejected including that of one Shri E. Rama Murthy.

(b) Subsequently, a prospecting licence (PL) No. 3257 was sanctioned to one Shri D. Srikantaiah for limestone over

area of 74.90 hectares in Mallapura village, Hosadurga taluk, Chitradurga district for a period of 2 years from

17/4/1986. The PL holder had filed a mining lease application in No. 82 AML 1987 on 18/4/1987 over an extent of

187 acres in Mallapura villa

4/10/2010 after following due procedure as the licensee failed to furnish requisite particulars is spite of several

opportunities being given and also the

mineral.

(c) Further, M/s. Vanivilas Mines & Minerals had made an application on 26/4/2002 for grant of mining lease for

limestone, dolomite and lime kankar over an area of 100 acres in survey num

¸ÀA¥ÀÄl 150 Volume 150

ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ, d£ÀªÀj 22, 2015Bengaluru, Th

(81)

¨sÁUÀ 1 gÁdå ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ ªÀÄÄRå DzÉñÀUÀ¼ÀÄ ºÁUÀÆ ¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯É ªÀÄÄAvÁzÀ

J¯Áè E¯ÁSÉUÀ½UÀÆ ¸ÀA§A¢ü¹zÀ DzÉñÀUÀ¼ÀÄ

COMMERCE AND INDUSTRIES SECRETARIAT

Mining Lease No. 2661 granted in favour of Shri R. Praveen Chandra for Iron ore and

over an area of 132.30 hectares of Ramajjanahalli Kaval and Mallapura

Villages, Hosadurga Taluk, Chitradurga District - Regarding premature termination.

Letter No. DMG/MLS/CEC/2013-14, dated 29/6/2013 from Director, Department of

Mines and Geology.

Government of Karnataka Notification No. Cl 34 MMM 2009 (P), dated 12/10/2010.

Notification dated 31/12/1980 (Gazetted on 8/1/1981) by Director, Department of

Mines and Geology.

Letter No. DMG/MLS/ML-2661/2013-14, dated 30/8/2013 from Director, Department

of Mines and Geology.

Director, Department of Mines & Geology vide letter dated 29/6/2012 read at (1) and 30/8/2013 read at (4) above, has

recommended for the premature termination of Mining Lease No. 2661 granted in favour of Shri R. Praveen Chandra for Iron ore and

Manganese ore over an area of 132.30 hectares of Rarnajjanahalli Kaval and Mallapura Villages, Hosadurga Taluk, Chitradurga D

Director, Department of Mines & Geology has furnished the details as follows:

Notification dated 31/12/1980 (Gazetted on 8/1/1981), read at (3) above, was u/r 58 of Mineral Concession Rules,

1960 inviting applications for mining manganese ore (at serial number 4 of the notification) over an area of 132.30

hectares in Mallapura village, Hosadurga taluk, Chitradurga district. Four applications were received and all were

cted including that of one Shri E. Rama Murthy.

Subsequently, a prospecting licence (PL) No. 3257 was sanctioned to one Shri D. Srikantaiah for limestone over

area of 74.90 hectares in Mallapura village, Hosadurga taluk, Chitradurga district for a period of 2 years from

17/4/1986. The PL holder had filed a mining lease application in No. 82 AML 1987 on 18/4/1987 over an extent of

187 acres in Mallapura village, Hosadurga taluk, Chitradurga district for limestone, but the same was rejected on

4/10/2010 after following due procedure as the licensee failed to furnish requisite particulars is spite of several

opportunities being given and also the mineral applied for was limestone whereas notification was for different

Further, M/s. Vanivilas Mines & Minerals had made an application on 26/4/2002 for grant of mining lease for

limestone, dolomite and lime kankar over an area of 100 acres in survey number 8 and 9 of Mallapura Village,

ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ, d£ÀªÀj 22, 2015 (ªÀiÁWÀ 2, ±ÀPÀ ªÀµÀð 1936uru, Thursday, January 22, 2015 (Magha 2, Shaka Varsha 1936

gÁdå ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ ªÀÄÄRå DzÉñÀUÀ¼ÀÄ ºÁUÀÆ ¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯É ªÀÄÄAvÁzÀ

Mining Lease No. 2661 granted in favour of Shri R. Praveen Chandra for Iron ore and

over an area of 132.30 hectares of Ramajjanahalli Kaval and Mallapura

14, dated 29/6/2013 from Director, Department of

MM 2009 (P), dated 12/10/2010.

Department of

Department

Director, Department of Mines & Geology vide letter dated 29/6/2012 read at (1) and 30/8/2013 read at (4) above, has

R. Praveen Chandra for Iron ore and

Manganese ore over an area of 132.30 hectares of Rarnajjanahalli Kaval and Mallapura Villages, Hosadurga Taluk, Chitradurga District.

Notification dated 31/12/1980 (Gazetted on 8/1/1981), read at (3) above, was u/r 58 of Mineral Concession Rules,

1960 inviting applications for mining manganese ore (at serial number 4 of the notification) over an area of 132.30

age, Hosadurga taluk, Chitradurga district. Four applications were received and all were

Subsequently, a prospecting licence (PL) No. 3257 was sanctioned to one Shri D. Srikantaiah for limestone over on

area of 74.90 hectares in Mallapura village, Hosadurga taluk, Chitradurga district for a period of 2 years from

17/4/1986. The PL holder had filed a mining lease application in No. 82 AML 1987 on 18/4/1987 over an extent of

ge, Hosadurga taluk, Chitradurga district for limestone, but the same was rejected on

4/10/2010 after following due procedure as the licensee failed to furnish requisite particulars is spite of several

for was limestone whereas notification was for different

Further, M/s. Vanivilas Mines & Minerals had made an application on 26/4/2002 for grant of mining lease for

ber 8 and 9 of Mallapura Village,

(ªÀiÁWÀ 2, ±ÀPÀ ªÀµÀð 1936) Magha 2, Shaka Varsha 1936)

¸ÀAaPÉ 4 Issue 4

Page 2: ¨ÁUÀ 1 - KarPage-81-124).pdf · 22/01/2015  · (e) Shri E. Rama Murthy had submitted a revised sketch on 31/5/2002 reducing the area to an extent of 380 acres. It was found that

PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ, d£ÀªÀj 22, 2015 sÁUÀ 1 82

Hosadurga taluk, Chitradurga district, but the same was rejected as the mineral applied for was different from the

notified material.

(d) Shri E. Rama Murthy had applied on 6/2/2002 for grant of mining lease for iron are and manganese over an area of

510 acres in Ramajjanahalli Kaval and Mallapura Village, Hosadurga taluk, Chitradurga district, taking advantage of

the fact that no time limit (cut off date) was prescribed in the said notification dated 31/12/1980 (Gazetted on

8/1/1981) for receiving applications.

(e) Shri E. Rama Murthy had submitted a revised sketch on 31/5/2002 reducing the area to an extent of 380 acres. It

was found that the area applied for falls within the notified area for manganese. Shri E. Rama Murthy had made an

application for the same minerals and there were no other applications for the said minerals. On reference, Deputy

Director of Mines & Geology, Chitradurga sent technical report on 18/11/2002 stating that the available mineral in

the applied area is manganese.

(f) The Deputy Commissioner, Chitradurga in his letter dated 7/6/2004 declined to issue no objection certificate on the

ground that the area applied for is adjacent to Vanivilas Sagar, if lease was granted, the waste soil eroded from

mining will flow into the dam and cause water pollution in the dam, which is used for supply of drinking water to

Hiriyur town.

(g) Further, on the request of Shri E. Rama Murthy in his letter dated 8/7/2004 that the area applied was more than 3 to

4 Kms away from the Vanivilas Sagar dam, the same was referred to the Deputy Commissioner, Chitradurga, who

in his letter dated 22/6/2005 agreed for grant of mining lease subject to getting approval from the appropriate

authority regarding conservation of soil / prevention of soil erosion by the applicant. In the mean time, consequent

to the death of Sri E. Rama Murthy, his son Shri R. Praveen Chandra has been recognized as legal

representative.

(h) On 27/3/2008 Shri R. Praveen Chandra submitted mining plan and Environmental Clearance, except KSPCB

clearance. The recommended area measures 380 acres, part of the area measuring 293 acres falls within the

notified area and an extent of 43 and 44 acres falls outside the notified area in two parts. For the notified area,

applications from the following were received:

(1) Shri. G. Dayananda, 986 AML 2008, dated 20/6/2008

(2) M/s Sharanya Exports, 1719 AML 2008, dated: 12/11/2008

(3) M/s Koppal Mines and Minerals Pvt. Ltd., 1724 AML 2008, dated 17/11/2008.

(4) M/s Kirloskar Ferrous Industries Ltd., 1725 AML 2008, dated 17/11/2008.

(i) On submission of the proposal, the State Government, after hearing all the five applicants and restricting the area to

132.20 hectares, recommended the application of Shri R. Praveen Chandra to Government of India on 10/9/2009. In

these recommendations, it is observed that the applicant R. Praveen Chandra already holds an existing mining

lease number 2294 at Chitradurga and the applicant proposes to establish 0.5 MPTA capacity integrated Steel Plant

at Bhadravathi taluk, Shimoga District and the minerals so extracted will be utilized for the captive purpose. Hence

the prior approval as per Section 5(1) of MMDR Act, 1957 for grant of mining lease over an area of 132.30 hectares

for iron and manganese ore for a period of 20 years was sought from Government of India. It is to be observed here

that the ore notified is manganese and while sending the proposal to the Government of India recommendation was

made for iron and manganese ore as a result of value addition.

(j) The Government of India vide its letter dated 23/7/2010 accorded approval for grant of mining lease for iron and

manganese ore. The State Government issued notification dated 12/10/2010, read at (2) above, for iron ore and

manganese over an extent of 132.30 hectares in favour of Sri. R. Praveen Chandra for a period of 20 years. During

Survey and Demarcation the area was restricted to 122.22 hectares and accordingly mining lease was executed on

27/5/2011. The remaining notified area of 10.10 hectare was coming in the limits of Mallapura village and back

water of Vanivilas Sagar.

(k) Meanwhile the Hon'ble Supreme Court in SLP 7366-77/ 2010 c/w WP (Civil) No 562/2009 had constituted Joint

team to conduct survey and demarcation of existing mines in Bellary, Chitradurga and Tumkur districts. After the

joint survey it was found that the enjoyment to the sanctioned lease sketch area of many mining leases had inherent

defects. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in its order dated 13/4/2012 and 20/4/2012 has accepted the CEC report and

directed to resume mining operations in respect of 'A' category mines only after completion of R&R plan prepared by

ICFRE, subject to acceptance by CEC at the costof lessee,

(1) Following this, the Directorate of Mines and Geology Department, to ensure that there is no deviation in the

sanctioned sketch to that of the enjoyment, issued a circular on 19/9/2011 to all the district officers to verify the

lease sketch with reference to notification and survey and demarcation sketches, survey number wise. The Deputy

Director has not reported any discrepancy/difference in the notified and executed sketch of the Mining Lease No

Page 3: ¨ÁUÀ 1 - KarPage-81-124).pdf · 22/01/2015  · (e) Shri E. Rama Murthy had submitted a revised sketch on 31/5/2002 reducing the area to an extent of 380 acres. It was found that

sÁUÀ 1 PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ, d£ÀªÀj 22, 2015 832661. At this juncture the Directorate felt it was necessary to ensure that no difference / deviation has taken place

while granting the mining leases and decided to re-examine all the related files once again before actual mining

starts. At the time of examining the file it was found that the mining plan approved by IBM in case of Shri R. Praveen

Chandra did not tally with the notified area sketch. As such the Director, Mines and Geology issued show cause

notice to Shri R. Praveen Chandra and heard the matter and has observed that the preliminary notification dated

31/12/1980 (published in Gazette dated 8/1/1981) was for manganese ore, whereas the final notification for grant of

lease was for iron and manganese ore and the mining plan approved by IBM did not tally with the granted sketch.

Hence The Director, Mines and Geology in his letter dated 29/6/2013 read at (1) above has recommended for

premature termination of mining lease bearing number 2661 over an extent of 122.22 hectares in Ramajjanahalli

Kaval and Mallapura villages of Hosadurga taluk, Chitradurga district where lease was executed for iron ore and

manganese.

2) The main reasons for recommending for premature termination are as follows:

a. That when the notification was for manganese ore only, the grant proposal/notification / execution of lease

deed should not have been considered for iron ore without any corrigendum.

b. The Deputy Director, Chitradurga reports the availability of good manganese ore in the applied area and

has not confirmed the occurrence of iron ore.

c. Since M/s Vanivilas Mines and Minerals application was rejected on the grounds that the applicant had

applied for the ore which is different to that of the notified ones, the same analogy applies to R. Praveen

Chandra.

d. The Government issued grant notification after obtaining prior approval of Government of India for the

precise area with location map boundaries mentioned therewith in contravention of the provisions of Rule 59

of MCR 1960.

e. That the granted sketch and the sketch attached to mining plan approved by IBM is not tallying and differ

from one another.

3) The Government based on the recommendation of the Director, Mines and Geology decided to hear the Lessee and

notice was issued on 30/7/2013. The case was heard on 8/8/2013, 19/8/2013 and 21/7/2014. Shn R. Praveen Chandra was given all

opportunities as per principle of nature justice. He filed replies on 8/8/2013 and additional statement on 21/7/2014. The arguments of

Shri R. Praveen Chandra were heard.

4) Following are the points raised in the arguments of Sri. R. Praveen Chandra.

a. The lease is executed for an area of 122.22 hectares as against the notified area of 132.30 hectares, as the

reduced area of 10.10 hectares falls in the village limit.

b. In the reply to the Show Cause Notice on 5/7/2012 it was submitted that the variation in the applied sketch to that of

the sketch in the IBM plan arose as the approval for mining plan from IBM was obtained on 22/8/2006 for an area of

153.78 hectares whereas the Government after hearing all the applicants proposed to the Government of India for

an area of 132.30 hectares on 30/9/2009. This submission was not considered by the Director, Mines Geology.

c. He agrees that the difference in sketch submitted to the IBM and the sketch of the notified area is due to bonafide

error and is neither intentional nor deliberate. He also submits that he will undertake not to commence or carry out

mining operations until the sketch attached to ML 2661 is modified by the State Government and until he obtain a

fresh modified mining plan approved by IBM in accordance with the modified sketch.

d. That the State government has no power conferred under the provision of MMDR Act 1957 or MC Rules 1960 to

prematurely terminate the mining lease. It is only the Government of India for reasons specified under Section 4A(1)

of MMDR Act 1957 can make premature termination of the mining lease.

5) In view of the above irregularities reported and on the recommendations of the Director, Department of Mines & Geology

for the premature termination of Mining Lease No. 2661 granted in favour of Shri R. Praveen Chandra for Iron ore and Manganese ore

over an area of 132.30 hectares of Ramajjanahalli Kaval and Mallapura Villages, Hosadurga Taluk, Chitradurga District, the matter has

been heard and examined by framing the following issues:

(a) Can the mining plan which has been already approved by the IBM be modified?

(b) What mineral is to be extracted from the mining area?

(c) Whether the mining lease executed should be terminated.

6) During the course of hearing and on examination of the submission made by the lessee and available records, the

following facts have been observed.

(a) For (a) it is seen that initially Shri E. Rama Murthy after applying for a Mining Lease over an area of 510 acres

(206.17 hectares) on 6/2/2002 submits a revised sketch on 31/5/2002 for an extent of 380 acres (153.78 hectares)

Page 4: ¨ÁUÀ 1 - KarPage-81-124).pdf · 22/01/2015  · (e) Shri E. Rama Murthy had submitted a revised sketch on 31/5/2002 reducing the area to an extent of 380 acres. It was found that

PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ, d£ÀªÀj 22, 2015 sÁUÀ 1 84 out of the original applied area. It is seen that the revised sketch submitted by the applicant for mining lease as well

as for the mining plan submitted to the IBM is made for 153.78 hectares whereas the area recommended to the

Government of India is 132.30 hectares, hence the difference. Rule 22 (6) of the Mineral Concession Rules, 1960

allows for modification in the mining plan with the prior approval of the competent authority. Hence mining plan can

be subjected to modification.

(b) For (b) it is seen, that the notification published in the Gazette on 8/1/1981 for an area of 132.30 hectares was

notified for manganese ore only whereas the application is made both for iron and manganese ore. The report of the

Deputy Director, Chitradurga also confirms the availability of manganese. It is seen that before recommending to the

Government of India for prior approval the contention of the applicant to establish 0.5 MPTA capacity integrated

Steel Plant at Bhadravathi taluk, Shimoga District and the minerals so extracted to be utilised for the captive

purpose was considered. As per the notification the permissible ore to be extracted is for manganese only and the

lessee is entitled for the mineral which is notified. Hence he is not eligible for winning the iron ore mineral at this

juncture.

(c) For (c) it is seen that the applied revised sketch (which falls partially in notified area and partially in virgin area) and

the notified sketch are not one and the same. If the sketches of the notified area, revised sketch by the applicant

and the survey & demarcation are taken into consideration, it is found that the notification was issued for an area of

132.30 hectares. The area was restricted to 122.30 hectares after survey & demarcation and the area would have

been further reduced if it was limited to applied sketch portion of the notified area. Thereby applicant has been

granted more area for which application was not made which is not sustainable in the eyes of law. Further, as

discussed above, since the recommendation in favour of the applicant considering his proposed investment in Iron

and Steel industry is based on iron ore mineral which was not included in the notification, it would be appropriate to

accept the report of the Director, Mines and Geology dated 29/6/2013 and recommend to the Government of India

for prematurely cancelling the mining lease 2661 issued in favour of R. Praveen Chandra.

7) After completing all the process, the decision of the Government is concluded as follows.

GOVERNMENT ORDER No. CI 110 MMM 2013 BANGALORE, DATED 7TH OCTOBER. 2014

In view of the explanations given in the above paras, with respect to the recommendation of the Director, Department of Mines

& Geology for the premature termination of Mining Lease No. 2661 granted in favour of Shri R. Praveen Chandra for Iron ore and

Manganese ore over an area of 132.30 hectares of Ramajjanahalli Kaval and Mallapura Villages, Hosadurga Taluk, Chitradurga District

the Government hereby orders as follows:

(a) To accept the proposal of the Director, Mines and Geology for premature termination of the mining lease 2661 and

send a proposal to Government of India in this regard.

(b) To cancel the Notification dated 31/12/1980 (Gazetted on 8/1/1981) issued by Director, Department of Mines

and Geology, with respect to serial number 4 therein, inviting applications for mining manganese ore, over an

area of 132.30 hectares in Mallapura village, Hosadurga taluk, Chitradurga district and to go in for fresh notification;

and

(c) To cancel Notification No. C1 34 MMM 2009 (P), dated 12/10/2010, granting mining lease for iron ore

and manganese over an extent of 132.30 hectares in favour of Sri. R. Praveen Chandra for a period of

20 years.

PR. 804

SC. 100

By Order and in the name of the Governor of Karnataka

E. SHIVARUDRAPPA

Under Secretary to Government (Mines)

Commerce and Industries Department

COMMERCE AND INDUSTRIES SECRETARIAT

Subject : Mining Lease No. 2654 granted in favour of Shri K.N. Srinivasa for Iron ore, Manganese ore

and BHQ over an area of 25-2 acres in Kammatheravu (Deogiri) Village, Sandur Taluk,

Bellary District - Regarding premature termination.

READ :

1. Letter No. DMG/MLS/ 1122AML/05/2012-13, dated 28/9/2012 from the Director,

Department of Mines & Geology

2. Letter No. DMG/MLS/ 1122AML/05/2005-06, dated 9/1/2006 from the Director,

Department of Mines & Geology

3. Government of Karnataka letter No. CI 11 MMM 2006 dated 5/6/2007

Page 5: ¨ÁUÀ 1 - KarPage-81-124).pdf · 22/01/2015  · (e) Shri E. Rama Murthy had submitted a revised sketch on 31/5/2002 reducing the area to an extent of 380 acres. It was found that

sÁUÀ 1 PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ, d£ÀªÀj 22, 2015 854. Government of India, Ministry of Mines letter No. 5/97/2007 - MIV, dated 10/7/2007.

5. Government of Karnataka Notification No. CI 11 MMM 2006, dated 3/9/2007

6. Letter No. REV/GANI/177/2006-07, dated 7/10/2011 from Deputy Commissioner

Bellary

7. Letter No. REV/GANI/63C/2011-12, dated 20/11/2011 from Deputy Commissioner,

Bellary

8. Letter to CEC No. REV:GANI:63:11-12- dated 24/5/2013 from Deputy Commissioner,

Bellary

PREAMBLE :

Director, Department of Mines & Geology vide letter dated 28/9/2012 read at (1) above, has recommended for the premature

termination of Mining Lease No. 2654 granted in favour of Shri K.N. Srinivasa for Iron ore, Manganese ore and BHQ over an area of 25-

2 acres in Kammatheravu (Deogiri) Village, Sandur Taluk, Bellary District. Director, Department of Mines & Geology and has furnished

the details as follows:

(a) Shri K.N. Srinivasa had made an application for a mining lease for Iron Ore. Manganese, BHQ over an area of 25.02

acres in field number 1 of Kammaterevu (Deogiri) village (unsettled) in Sandur taluk of Bellary District vide his

application No. 1122 AML dated 23/9/2005. In the application, the applicant had mentioned that the lands referred to

were "patta lands" owned by him as well as by various surface right holders obtained under saguvali chits as detailed

below:

Sl.

No.

Survey No

(pymasi)

Extent

(acres-cents)

Name of the occupant/

Pattadar as per RTC

1 39,42,47 M/P 13 3.00 Shri K.N. Srinivasa

2 IM/P10 2.00 Shri K.N. Srinivasa

3 39, 42, 47 M/P 14 4.97 Smt. N. Pushpa

4 39,42,47 M/P 14 2.33 Shri Nanjunda Reddy

5 01 2.22 Shri Maliyappa

6 01/MP22 1.50 Shri Krishnappa

7 01/mp 18 2.00 Shri D. Ningappa

8 29/MP 6.00 Shri S. Bylappa

9 39,42 & 47 MP-9 1.00 Shri Krishnappa

(b) On verification of records it was found that entire are applied for lease overlapped with the areas covered in 5 earlier

applications and also with the held & surrendered area of M/s. SMIORE:

Sl. No. Details Remarks

1 138 APL 93 /

24/9/2013

Rejected by Government on 8/3/1994

2 228 AML 93 /

28/8/1993

Rejected by Government on 5/3/1994

3 374 AML 4 /

16/7/2004

Applicant has not produced consent letters from Pattadars as required

u/r 22(h) of MCR, 1960

4 387 AML 04 /

24/7/2004

Application belonged to the present applicant and has since withdrawn

5 945 AL 00 /

30/7/2004

Application belonged to the present applicant and has since withdrawn

(c) Since the applicant was a pattadar, holding consent letters from other pattadars, Director, Department of Mines &

Geology had sent a proposal to Government for grant of mining lease to Shri K.N. Srinivasa vide letter dated

9/1/2006 read at (2) above. Government of Karnataka had sent a proposal to Ministry of Mines, Government of

India, vide letter dated 5/6/2007 read at (3) above, seeking prior approval by invoking provision of rule 59 (2) of

MCR.

Page 6: ¨ÁUÀ 1 - KarPage-81-124).pdf · 22/01/2015  · (e) Shri E. Rama Murthy had submitted a revised sketch on 31/5/2002 reducing the area to an extent of 380 acres. It was found that

PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ, d£ÀªÀj 22, 2015 sÁUÀ 1 86 (d) Subsequently, the applicant was asked to produce the mmmg plan approvco by Iridian Bureau of Mines (IBM), CFE

from Karnataka State Pollution Control Board (KSPCB) and Environment Clearance from Ministry of Environment &

Forest (MoEF) on 30/1/2006. Letters were addressed to the Deputy Director of Mines & Geology, Hospet for

furnishing the technical report in respect of the applied area and the Deputy Commissioner, Bellary District for a

No Objection Certificate. Deputy Director of Mines & Geology, Hospet sent report vide his letter dated 21/6/2006

recommending the case for grant of lease confirming the availability of ore reserves. The report of the

Deputy Commissioner, Bellary District had not been received as on that date. The applicant had submitted the

mining plan approved by IBM on 19/8/2006.

(e) As per Section 5(1) of MMDR Act 1957, the State Government had sent a proposal to the Ministry of Mines,

Government of India in its letter dated 05/06/2007 seeking prior approval for grant of mining lease to the applicant.

Government of India vide its letter dated 10/7/2007, read at (4) above, conveyed its approval, besides relaxation u/r

rule 59(2) of MCR, 1960. Thereafter, State Government issued orders granting mining lease to the applicant for iron

ore, manganese & BHQ over an area of 25.02 acres in Kammateruvu (Deogiri) Village (unsettled), Sandur taluk,

Bellary District vide Notification dated 3/9/2007, read at (5) above. In pursuance thereof, the Deputy Director of

Mines and Geology, Hospet had sent a report on 9/9/2008 after completing the Survey & demarcation of the lease

area as required under rule 33 of MCR 1960.

(f) Even after lapse of one year from the date of grant of mining lease, the applicant had not produced the No Objection

Certificate (NOC) from the revenue authorities. On the other hand, in his letter dated 1/9/2008, the applicant had

made a request to send another letter to the revenue authorities for furnishing the NOC in respect this lease on the

premise that the earlier letter sent by this Directorate to the Deputy Commissioner, Bellary was not traceable in that

office. Considering the request made by the grantee, another letter was sent to the Deputy Commissioner, Bellary

on 27/9/2008 enclosing a copy of the earlier one seeking. This was followed by one more reminder on 8/9/2009.

(g) The grantee had produced Environmental Clearance obtained from SEIAA, Karnataka on 21/10/2009. However he

had sought condonation of delay in executing the lease deed on the ground that clearance from KSPCB was

awaited.

(h) The Deputy Commissioner, Bellary vide his letter dated 29/10/2009 had conveyed his opinion not to grant the

mining lease in the applied area. He had also enclosed a copy of his earlier report dated 26/02/2007 wherein he had

indicated that some patta lands in the applied area were granted in contravention of Section 58 of Land Reforms

Act.

(i) In the meantime, the Deputy Conservator of Forests, Bellary, in his letter dated 28/9/2010 addressed to the Deputy

Commissioner, Bellary, informed that the sanctioned area was not a forest area. Although the Deputy

Commissioner, Bellary had earlier opined against grant of mining lease, conveyed his no objection to the grant of

mining lease to Shri K.N. Srinivasa vide his letter dated 29/9/2010.

(j) In the meantime, the grantee produced Consent for Establishment (CFE) given by KSPCB on 2/2/2010. The State

Government vide its letter dated 19/11/2010 condoned the delay in executing the lease deed. Further, upon

production of required statutory documents viz. Mining Closure Plan, proof of having paid EPF, digital sketch, copy

of challan for having paid the conversion fee, payment of security deposit etc., lease deed under No. 2654 was

executed on 30/12/2010 for a period of 20 years.

(k) Although the lessee had not produced copy of the Order of conversion issued as per Section 95(2) of Karnataka

Land Revenue Act, the matter was again referred to the Deputy Commissioner, Bellary. The Deputy Commissioner,

Bellary, in his letter dated 7/10/2011, read at (6) above, had pointed out various fallacies in the grant of NOC to the

lessee and also stated that no conversion permission was granted to the lessee in respect of the land referred nor

the mining lease holder had applied for it.

(l) Towards affording an opportunity of making a representation, the Deputy Commissioner, Bellary had issued a

Notice to the lessee on 15/10/2011. Since the lessee failed to furnish his explanation, the Deputy Commissioner,

Bellary in his Order dated 20/11/2011, read at (7) above, withdrew the No objection Certificate granted to the lessee

earlier. Similarly, Department of Mines & Geology also issued a notice to the lessee calling upon him to show cause

as to why the mining lease granted to him should not be terminated prematurely. But the lessee, instead of

furnishing his reply, resorted to correspondence and even to this day he has continued to do so.

(m) In the meantime, one Smt. Durgabai Tambde filed objection, through her Advocate, against commencement of

mining operations by the lessee stating that the lessee had trespassed into her landed property in survey number

39, 42, 47-M/P8, measuring 3.50 acres situated at Deogiri village and attempting to conduct illegal mining activity

therein. Further, one Shri M.P. Nataraj complained that the lessee not only hushed up the fact of withdrawing his

earlier Application No. 374 AML 04 but also misrepresented the facts by stating that the lands applied for were patta

lands while in actuality, they were revenue lands.

Page 7: ¨ÁUÀ 1 - KarPage-81-124).pdf · 22/01/2015  · (e) Shri E. Rama Murthy had submitted a revised sketch on 31/5/2002 reducing the area to an extent of 380 acres. It was found that

sÁUÀ 1 PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ, d£ÀªÀj 22, 2015 87(n) The Joint Team constituted by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in its Order dated 13/6/2011 in SLP No. 7366-77/2010

c/w WP (Civil) No. 562/2009, conducted survey and demarcation of iron ore mining leases in Bellary district and

submitted its findings to the Apex Court. Further, CEC had submitted its final report to the Hon'ble Supreme Court

on 3/2/2012 in which the mining lease granted to Shri K.N. Srinivasa figured under Category-B with regard to the

fact that encroachment in the form of over burden dump over an extent of 0.13 hectares was found in this mining

lease. Moreover, the CEC had also been apprised of various violations pointed out by the Deputy Commissioner,

Bellary in his letter dated 7/10/2011.

(0) The Department of Mines and Geology had issued circular instructions to all its field officers at the district level on

19/9/2011 to furnish details as to whether the extent of area granted/ surveyed and demarcated and the area

reflected in the lease deed executed are one and the same. Keeping this aspect in view and having regard to the

details stated above, the case was taken up for further verification. On such further verification, it was found that the

lessee had not submitted consent letters obtained from the pattadar /s in respect of pymasi survey number 39,42,47

MP9, to an extent 3.50 acres. Besides it was also noticed that the consent letter given by Shri D. Ningappa

S/o Rajappa in respect of survey number 01/MP 18 was for 2.00 acres while the extent in his name was only

0.50 acres.

2) Based on the report of the Director, Mines and Geology, the State Government issued notice to the lessee of Mining

Lease No. 2654 Shri K.N. Srinivasa on 10/10/2012 giving him opportunity of being heard. The Lessee in his letter dated 18/10/2012

submitted that he has requested the Director on 28/6/2012 to provide some documents but he has not received the same, and hence

requested to postpone till such time the documents are given to him. Hearing was conducted 23/1/2013, 11/2/2013, 15/6/2013,

22/6/2013, 15/7/2013, 23/7/2013 and concluded on 2/8/2013. The lessee had submitted his reply to the Secretary to Government,

Commerce & Industries Department, Government of Karnataka on 25/6/2013. However the hearing was conducted afresh on

21/7/2014, wherein the Lessee submitted to consider his earlier submission made on 19/6/2013.

3) The lessee of Mining Lease No. 2654 Shri K.N. Srinivasa, in his written argument dated 19/6/2013, has submitted as

follows:

(a) The Deputy Commissioner and the Director have deliberately suppressed the letter written by them to the CEC CIne

non-acceptance of the recommendation made by the Deputy Commissioner by the CEC. The Deputy Commissioner

had no jurisdiction to decide the title of the properties.

(b) All the lands are patta land and the lessee has obtained the consent of these pattadars for obtaining mining lease.

In case of survey number 39,42, 47M 14 measuring 2 acres 33 cents and 4 acres 97 cents application was made to

the Tahasildar for grant since they were cultivating the said land and the Tahasildar has granted saguvali chit dated

24/5/2003 and 23/4/2003 with a condition that the grantee should not alienate for a period of 15 years.

(c) Regarding the surrendered area of SMIORE the relaxation is obtained under Rule 59 (2) of the MCR 1960.

(d) That before execution of lease deed an application to the Tahasildar was made on 13/12/2010 for grant of

permission from agriculture land to mining purpose. The Tahasildar wrote to the Deputy Commissioner to grant

conversion of those lands for mining purpose on 18/12/2010, The lease was executed on 30.12.2010. A sum of

rupees 5,44,892 was paid as conversion fee on 20/12/2010. The Deputy Commissioner has not passed any order

till today on conversion and if he has not passed any order within 120 days from the date of application it is deemed

conversion as per Section 95 (5) of Karnataka Land Revenue act. Henee the rl.een;ed convc-sion from agriculture

to rmrung purpose.

(e) Regarding the submission of the Deputy Commissioner to the Member Secretary of CEC for cancelling the mining

lease granted, the CEC after recording the objection raised by Smt. Durgabai Tambde and the proceedings of the

Assistant Commissioner dated 24.6.2011, stated that the tribunal has rejected the application way back in 1984 and

there is no merit in the claim.

(f) The Rule 108 (J) (i) does not apply to this case as the lands are not sold.

4) With all the above argument, the Lessee of Mining Lease No. 2654 Shri K.N. Srinivasa, has requested to reject the report

of the Deputy Commissioner and Director of Mines and Geology and to direct the Director of Mines and Geology to implement the

decision of CEC.

5) Meanwhile, the Deputy Commissioner, Bellary District, in his letter dated 24/5/2013, read at (8) above, addressed to the

Member Secretary, Central Empowered Committee (CEC) , has pointed out following irregularities with respect to the Lessee of Mining

Lease No. 2654 of Shri K.N. Srinivasa:

(a) Fictitious grant orders have been created in respect of area to an extent of 4.97 acres and 2.33 acres in Pymasi No,

39, 47/MP.1 in favour of Smt. N. Pushpa and Shri N. Nanjunda Reddy and mutated in their names.

(b) The Lessee has not got the lands converted for non-agriculture purposes before applying for mining lease.

(c) Even in respect of other survey numbers, they were Inam land and hence area was not correctly identified and

sketches were manipulated.

Page 8: ¨ÁUÀ 1 - KarPage-81-124).pdf · 22/01/2015  · (e) Shri E. Rama Murthy had submitted a revised sketch on 31/5/2002 reducing the area to an extent of 380 acres. It was found that

PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ, d£ÀªÀj 22, 2015 sÁUÀ 1 88 (d) There were no Sakrama Samiti resolutions in proof of grants.

(e) Assistant Commissioner, Bellary has conducted detailed enquiry and passed orders cancelling the grant made in

respect of Pymasi No. 39, 42, 47/M.P14 measuring 7.30 acres, and in RTC &, mutations lands are shown as

Government lands.

6) The Deputy Commissioner, Bellary District, in view of the series of irregularities noticed and the offences committed by

8hri K.N. Srinivasa, has recommended for placing the Mining Lease No. 2654 of Shri K.N. Srinivasa in 'C' category and to stop all the

mining activities in that regard.

7) In view of the above irregularities reported and on the recommendations of the Director, Department of Mines & Geology

for the premature termination of Mining Lease No. 2654 granted in favour of Shri K.N. Srinivasa for Iron ore, Manganese ore and BHQ

over an area of 25-2 acres in Kammatheravu (Deogiri) Village, Sandur Taluk, Bellary District, the matter has been heard and examined

by framing the following issues:

(a) Whether the lessee has the right over the said lands.

(b) Whether to terminate the mining lease based on the report of the Director, Mines and Geology.

8) During the course of hearing and on examination of the submission made by the lessee and available records, the

following facts have been observed.

(a) It is seen that the application is made for an area of 25.04 acres in patta land. Out of 6 survey numbers, two survey

number are held by the applicant (extent 5 acres), two survey numbers where land is granted by sakrama samithi

(extent 7 acres 30 cents) and two other survey number by different person (3 acres 72 cents). All the process

regarding grant of mining lease was carried out and lease deed executed. It is seen that no survey and demarcation

has been done nor conversion of agriculture land to other purpose which is one of the condition for taking the

activity of mining has been done. In this case it is seen that the land which is agriculture land has not been

converted for non-agriculture purpose. The lessee applies for conversion of the land to the Tahasildar who in turr-

sends to the Deputy Commissioner for further order. Since the Deputy Commissioner has not passed any order

within 120 days the lessee is of the view that the land has been deemed conversion. Even though the law permits

for deemed conversion if a decision is not taken within 120 days the purpose for which the land would have been

used after conversion has to be taken into consideration. Even though the Deputy Commissioner has issued a

notice to the lessee on 15/ 10/2011 to explain his view on the conversion of land the lessee has failed to reply to the

notice. It is seen that the same attitude is continued with the Director, Mines and Geology who had show caused

him for premature termination of the mining lease wherein the lessee do not reply but restores to protracted

correspondence. If the lessee had any issues regarding the conversion of the said land he could have replied to the

notices issued by various authorities and also would have applied afresh for conversion, the same not been done.

Section 95 (1) of Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 allows agriculture land for purposes like buildings or

construction of wells or tank whereas section 95 (2) of the said Act clearly indicates that any occupant of land

assessed or held for the purpose of agriculture wishes to divert such land or any part thereof to any other purpose,

he shall apply for permission to the Deputy Commissioner. Hence the lessee had to apply before the Deputy

Commissioner which has not been done. In a similar type of case the Hon 'ble Court has dealt with the provision of

deemed conversion of agriculture land in Writ Petition No. 20380 of 2010 (N. Nanjappa Vs The State of Karnataka)

which is placed in the file. The Hori'ble Court has dismissed the same concluding that without prejudice to the rights

of the petitioner to make a fresh application in accordance with law with the following observation:

"opinion that this is not a fit case for exercistnq the discretionaru jurisdiction in favour of a person like

the petitioner, whose application, in the first instance, does not appear to be in order, as the

application itself is addressed to tahsildar, uiho is not the authority to qrani permission for

conversion"

A statutory deemed permission is not a desirable prouision, which is more often than nor misused or

abused and what withy letharainess, being leqendaru on the part of revenue officials coupled with

increasing corrupt elements in the revenue department, who can in. a given case even where the

application is totallu undeserving or an application is in respect of some land belonging to some other

person or even government land can deliberatelu be kept pending for four months to enable the

statutoru provision to operate for a deemed permission, is nothing short of an obnoxious provision and

to the detriment of the larger public interest.

(b) Any change of land use for other purpose, application for conversion has to be made by the land owners. There are

no records to show that the application is made by the concerned land owners. The lessee fails to prove the same

and has only relied on the deemed conversion which is not correct. If he was aggrieved by any act of the Revenue

Authorities the same could have been challenged before the Appellate Authority which is not made.

Page 9: ¨ÁUÀ 1 - KarPage-81-124).pdf · 22/01/2015  · (e) Shri E. Rama Murthy had submitted a revised sketch on 31/5/2002 reducing the area to an extent of 380 acres. It was found that

sÁUÀ 1 PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ, d£ÀªÀj 22, 2015 89(c) Regarding the applicability of Section 108(i) and (j) of Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 the condition is that the

grantee shall not alienate the land nor use it for non-agriculture purpose for a period of fifteen years from the date of

issue of Saguvali chit or certificate grant to him. Hence it is a clear violation of the statute since the granted land to

the extent of 7 acres 30 cents is being used for non agriculture purpose.

(d) In the case of land granted to an extent of 7 acres 30 gunta by the sakrama samithi has been cancelled by the

Assistant Commissioner as no file is available to authenticate the grant of land thereby vesting the land with the

Government. Also it is stated that the consent of pattadars to an extent of 3.5 acres has not been submitted by the

lessee and in one of the consent for 2.00 acres, the pattadar had rights over half a acre of land. On records these

have not been challenged by the lessee before any authority or substantiate the position during submission before

this authority.

(e) It is also seen that Inam land in other survey number exists and since no sketches and no settlements were there

the area is not correctly identified and sketches were manipulated to obtain the mining lease. Hence he does not

have right over the entire land.

(f) The lessee has submitted that the CEC had mentioned that the lessee will be eligible to undertake mining operation

only if permission for non agriculture use of private lands included in the mining lease is granted after due process

of law. There is no dispute that he is eligible for undertaking mining operation after all due process of law regarding

conversion are completed. Now the question arises on the extent of land for which the lessee can be allowed mining

activities, as the lessee is left out with only 13 acres 72 cents at present whereas the notification and lease executed

is for 25.02 acres as discussed in the above paras. As per the notification there is ambiguity in the right over the

extent of land by the lessee and the status of the land for which the notification needs to be cancelled. Hence it

would be appropriate to cancel the notification and terminate the mining lease.

9) After completing all the process, the decision of the Government is concluded as follows :

GOVERNMENT ORDER No: CI 211 MMM 2013, BENGALURU, DATED 7th

OCTOBER 2014

In view of the explanations given in the above paras, with respect to the recommendation of the Director, Department of Mines

& Geology for the premature termination of Mining Lease No. 2654 granted in favour of Shri K.N. Srinivasa for Iron ore, Manganese ore

and BHQ over an area of 25-2 acres in Kammatheravu (Deogiri) Village, Sandur Taluk, Bellary District, the Government hereby orders

as follows:

(a) To accept the proposal of the Director, Mines and Geology for premature termination of mmmg lease 2654, and

cancellation of Notification No. CI 11 MMM 2006, dated 3/9/2007, granting mining lease to Shri K.N. Srinivasa; and

(b) To recommend to the Government of India for premature termination of mining lease 2654 on grounds of non

adherence to conversion of agriculture land and the holdings of extent of land not being as per the claim of the

lessee.

PR. 805

SC. 100

By Order and in the name of the Governor of Karnataka

E. SHIVARUDRAPPA

Under Secretary to Government (Mines)

Commerce and Industries Department

COMMERCE AND INDUSTRIES SECRETARIAT

Subject : Milling Lease Application No. No. 911-AML-2005 filed by Srnt. R. Kasturi Radhakrishnan for

grant of mining lease in survey number 150 of Jammapura Village, Jagalur Taluk,

Davanagere District over an area of 31 .16 hectares for manganese ore and iron ore -

Regarding withdrawal of recommendation.

READ :

1. Communications from Director, Department of Mines 8: Geology

a) Notification dated 31/12/1980

b) No. DMG:MLS:911-AML-2005/08-09, dated 18/6/2008

c) No. DMG:MLS:911-AML-2005/ 12-13, dated 30/1/2013

d) No DMG:MLS:911AML 2005:2014-15, dated 28/6/2013

e) No. DMG/MLS/911-AML-2005/13-14, dated 8/1/2014

f) Check list dated 4/1/2014

g) No. DMG:MLS:911AML 2005:2014-15, dated 5/7/2014

h) No, DMG:MLS:911AML 2005:2014-15 .. dated 19/7/2014

i) No. DMG:MLS:911AML 2005:2014-15, dated 26/7/2014

j) No. DMG/MLS/911AML 2005/14-15, dated 4/8/2014

Page 10: ¨ÁUÀ 1 - KarPage-81-124).pdf · 22/01/2015  · (e) Shri E. Rama Murthy had submitted a revised sketch on 31/5/2002 reducing the area to an extent of 380 acres. It was found that

PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ, d£ÀªÀj 22, 2015 sÁUÀ 1 90 2. GOK Notification No. CI 9 MMM 2002, dated 8/12/2004

3. GOK Letter No. CI 274 MMM 2008, dated 17/3/2012

4. GOI letter No. 5/22/2012-M-IV, dated 1/5/2012

5. Proceedings of the Secretary to Government, Commerce 8: Industries

Department dated 28/8/2013

6. Written statement by Smt. R. Kasturi Radhakrishnan, wlo Shri Radhakrishna

Pillai dated 25/512013, 23/6/2014, 5/7/2014 and 19/7/2014

7. GOK Notification No. CI162 MMM 2006, dated 16/112007

PREAMBLE :

Director, Mines and Geology Department, vide his letter dated 30/1/2013, read at (1-c) above, had submitted a proposal to

withdraw the recommendation made to Government of India vide letter dated 17/3/2012, read at (3) above, in respect of mining lease

application No. 911 -AML-2005 filed by Smt. R. Kasturi Radhakrishnan (hereinafter called Applicant) for grant of mining lease in survey

number 150 of Jammapura Village, Jagalur Taluk, Davanagere District over an area of 31.16 hectares for manganese ore and iron ore

for a period of 30 years, the reason being that the prospecting license was not granted in accordance with the prevailing law and

prospecting is not done as specified. Contentions made by the Director, Mines and Geology Department, vide his letter dated

30/1/2013, read at (1) above, are as follows:

a) Shri Radhakrishnan Pillai had applied for Prospecting License for an area of 40 hectares on 18/11 /1998 and the

Government vide notification dated 8/12/2004, read at (2) above, granted prospecting license 3357 for a period of

three years in favour of Smt. R. Kasturi Radhakrishnan (legal heir of Sri. Radhakrishnan Pillai since deceased) over

an area of 38.55 hectares for manganese ore, considering it as a virgin area. The area so granted for prospecting

license falls within the notified area. The Government had earlier called for applications for grant of mineral

concession vide Notification dated 31/1211980, read at (i-a) above, for an area of 430.99 hectares in Jammapura

village, Jagalur taluk, Chitradurga District (Now in Davanagere District) for manganese ore, Pursuant to the

notification 13 applications were received. The prospecting license was granted in violation of rule 59 of MCR, 1960

as the applications received in response to the notification were pending.

b) The Applicant neither submitted quarterly reports, as specified in the prospecting license deed book (Forrn-R), nor

reports as mentioned in rule 16(1) & (2) of MCR, 1960. The Applicant had submitted four months monthly reports for

manganese ore from March 2005 to June 2005 on 21/7/2005 even though the lease period was to expire on

February 2008.

c) The Applicant had applied for grant of mining lease vide application No. 911 AML 2005 on 21/7/2005 for

manganese ore within five months of granting of prospecting license without submitting the final report on

prospecting as per rules, nor intimating the completion of prospecting. Hence the Applicant had applied for grant of

mining lease when the prospecting license was still in force. The Applicant has carried out incomplete prospecting

work which clearly shows that she had got prospecting license only to get preference uls 11 (1) of MMDR Act, 1957.

d) Even though the application for grant of mining lease was made on 21/7/2005 for manganese ore, the Applicant on

18/9/2006 had requested to include iron and manganese ore for grant of mining lease since the presence of iron

and manganese ore was established during prospecting. The prospecting report which is submitted on 6/2/2007

indicates the presence of iron and manganese ore. The Applicant even though had established the presence of iron

ore during prospecting, had not reported to the Government within sixty days from the date of such discovery,

thereby violated rule 14(1) of MCR, 1960. The Applicant also produced a revised sketch for an extent of 77 acres

(31.16 hectare) instead of the earlier extent of 95.25 acres (40 hectare).

e) For any mineral specified in the First Schedule to MMDR Act, reconnaissance permit, prospecting license or mining

lease can be granted after getting aoproval of the Central. Government which has not been done during addition ot

iron ore in case of the prospecting license granted to the Applicant.

2) Director, Department of Mines & Geology in his letter dated 30/1/2013, read at (1-c) above, had stated that he was

withdrawing the recommendation made to the State Government vide his letter dated 18/612008, read at (1-b) above, on the mining

lease in application No. 911 AML 2005.

3) Based on the report of the Director, Department of Mines & Geology, as mentioned above, notice was issued to the

Applicant uls 26(1) of MMDR Act on 7/5/2013. The hearing was conducted on 15/5/2013, 30/5/2013, 22/6/2013 and 15/7/2013. The

Applicant in her written statement on 25/5/2013 has mentioned the following facts.

Page 11: ¨ÁUÀ 1 - KarPage-81-124).pdf · 22/01/2015  · (e) Shri E. Rama Murthy had submitted a revised sketch on 31/5/2002 reducing the area to an extent of 380 acres. It was found that

sÁUÀ 1 PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ, d£ÀªÀj 22, 2015 91a) In order to establish the availability of manganese ore the application was made seeking prospecting license and

thereafter applied for mining lease. The State Government with prior approval of Government of India has issued

prospecting license on 8/12/2004.

b) As per rule 16 of MCR the applicant has submitted to the State Government six monthly report of the work

done.

c) The applicant found evidence of manganese ore, submitted report on 22/12/2005 and application was made for

grant of mining lease for extracting I excavating manganese ore. While conducting prospecting the availability of

iron ore mineral was noticed and tho same was informed to the Director on 18/9/2006 and also a request was made

to the Director for inclusion in the mining lease application. The Deputy Director also conducted spot inspection and

submitted technical report stating the availability of iron ore mineral. After receiving the proposal from the Director,

Mines and Geology the recommendation was made by the State Government to Government of India for grant of

mining lease. The Government of India sought some clarification from the State Government which had not been

sent till date.

d) The area applied for was not a part of the notification and no person had filed any application in respect of the area

applied by the applicant. The area notified was already granted to M/s. Deccan Mining Syndicate. The prospecting

license was not questioned by any other applicant. The Deputy Directors report states that the area is a virgin land.

Even assuming that it is part of area notified, all the applications were considered by the State Government and,

having regard to the qualifications of applicant, Government had granted prospecting license. All the applications

have been rejected by the State Government.

e) Regarding the submission of quarterly report as per rule 16 of MCR 1960 which has been amended, the quarterly

report has been replaced by six monthly reports. The outer limit for the report to be submitted being within three

months before expiry of the license or abandonment of the portions or termination whichever is earlier. The final

report is submitted well before three months, before the expiry of the prospecting license.

f) Since the Applicant had reported the discovery of new mineral within sixty days of the discovery, such mineral is

deemed to have been included within the prospecting license by operation of law.

g) The final report is submitted in June 2005 and allegation, that the prospecting is not completed, is not true

4) The then Secretary to the Government, Commerce and Industries Department, after hearing the case, had made an

order on 28/8/2013, read at (5) above, stating that it would not be proper for withdrawing the recommendation made earlier and

ordered for considering the application for mining lease and to send the additional information to Government of India as requested by

GOI in their letter No. 5/22/2012-M-IV, dated 1/5/2012, read at (4) above, regarding item number IX & X.

5) The order made by the then Secretary to Government, Commerce and Industries Department on 28/8/2013, read at (5)

above, was not maintainable as the approval of the Government was not taken. The Government Notification dated 16/1/2007, read at

(7) above, only empowers the Secretary to Government to hear the case as provided under Rule 26(1) of MCR, 1960, but the final

orders has to be passed by the Government after the approval of the competent authority. Hence, the Government preferred to hear the

case again. Notice was served on 16/6/2014. Hearing was done on 23/612014, 517/2014, 19/7/2014, 26/7/2014, 30/7/2014 & 4/8/2014,

The Applicant submitted written documents on 23/6/2014, 5/7/2014 and 19/7/2014 and requested as follows:

a) To consider the order passed by Secretary on 28/3/2013 (30/8/2013).

b) To expedite sanction of mining lease.

c) The Government has no power to issue notice again since the Secretary has already heard and passed the order in

the case.

d) The licensee states that all the application has been rejected before giving prospecting license.

6) The issue which has arisen before the Government is as follows:

a) Whether to accept the recommendation of the Director, Mines and Geology for withdrawing the recommendation

made to the Government of India for grant of mining lease in favour of Smt. Kasturi? And

b) What orders?

7) The outcome is, for (a) in affirmative, and (b) as per orders. Based on the reports of Director, Department of Mines &

Geology and submission of the Applicant (Smt. R. Kasturi Radhakrishnan), the following facts emerge:

a) The State Government had issued Notification on 31/12/1980, read at (1-a) above, for grant of mineral concession

for "manganese ore" for an area of 430.99 hectares in Jammapura village, Jagalur Taluk, Chitradurga District

(now in Davanagere District). A total of 13 applications were received including the three applications (2

prospecting license applications and 1 mining lease application) of Sri Radhakrishnan Pillai over this area. One

prospecting license received in 1984 vide No. 112-APL-82 / 29-RVN-84 was rejected in the year 1991, another

application for mining lease received in 1984 vide No. 208-AML- 1984 was rejected in 1985 but another application

for prospecting license received in the year 1998 vide No, 61-APL-1998 for an area of 100 acres was considered by

Page 12: ¨ÁUÀ 1 - KarPage-81-124).pdf · 22/01/2015  · (e) Shri E. Rama Murthy had submitted a revised sketch on 31/5/2002 reducing the area to an extent of 380 acres. It was found that

PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ, d£ÀªÀj 22, 2015 sÁUÀ 1 92 the Government and granted the prospecting license No. 3357 was on 9/2/2005. Whereas, the Director, Mines and

Geology Department in his report dated 4/8/2014, read at (4- j) above, had stated that the ML applications of

Shri K.V. Manjunath (62- APL-93), K.R, Dhanaraj (208-AML-95), M/s Brindavan Mines and Minerals Company

(295-AML-93), Smt M. Padrnavathi (115-AML-96) and M/s Deccan Mining Syndicate (167-AML-1984) which were

received earlier to the ML application of Sri Radhakrishnan Pillai in response to the notification of the Government

on 31/12/1980 are still pending. Hence, the grant of prospecting license is not in order. The following points also

confirm that the recommendation made on the application for grant of prospecting license was not proper:

i) The checklist of the Director, Mines & Geology Department sent to the Government recommending the

prospecting license on 29/2/2001 has stated that the Applicant is the sole applicant which is wrong.

ii) The Applicant before applying for prospecting license on 18/11/1998 is well aware of the notification made by

the Government on 31/12/1980 for mineral concession since his earlier two applications had already been

rejected.

iii) The Deputy Director during recommending the prospecting license has also wrongly reported that the land is

a virgin area.

iv) The recommendation made by the Director, Mines and Geology Department for grant of prospecting license in

favour of Shri Radhakrishnan Pillai on 21/11/2011 is not in order for the reason that the applications received

pursuant to the notification were pending for decision.

b) Objections raised by the Director, Mines & Geology Department with respect to contravention of law are discussed

as under:

i) That the prospecting work is not carried out properly and rule 16(1) and (2) stipulates that the licensee has

to submit six monthly reports within three months of the close of the period to which it relates and also a full

report of work done by him and all information relevant to mineral resources acquired by him in course of

prospecting within three months of the expiry of the license which has not been done, as the licensee has

submitted only four monthly reports for manganese ore from March 2005 to June 2005 on 21/7/2005, which

is the date of ML application filed by the applicant and then final prospecting report is made on 6/2/2007,

thereby violating these provisions, The provision of Rule 16(1) & (2) is reproduced as under:

16. Report of information obtained by the licensee:

(1) The licensee shall submit to the State Government a six monthly report of the work done by him stating the number

of persons engaged and disclosing in full the geological, geophysical or other valuable data collected by him during

the period. The report shall be submitted within three months of the close of the period to which it relates.

(2) The licensee shall also submit to the State Government within three months of the expiry of the licence, or

abandonment of operations or termination of the licence, whichever is earlier, a full report of work done by him and

all information relevant to mineral resources acquired by him in the course of prospecting operations in the area

covered by the licence.

ii) It is seen that even before the final report of prospecting dated 6/2/2007 is submitted by the licensee, an application

for grant of mining lease for manganese ore has been applied on 21/7/2005. Though nothing bars the Applicant

from applying for ML within 2 years period, it is not in doubt that ML has to be applied after prospecting. It means

that the prospecting was over before 21/7/2005 itself Where was the need for the licensee to continue prospecting

when he has applied for ML of Manganese? Either it means ML application was not proper and prospecting was not

complete implying that ML should be rejected or alternatively he should not have pursued prospecting. Though he

continued prospecting, six monthly reports were not submitted.

iii) Rule 14(1)(v) states as follows:

(v) the licensee shall report to the State Government the discovery of any mineral not specified in the licence within a

period of sixty days from the date of such discovery. Consequent upon such reporting, such newly discovered

mineral shall be deemed to have been included in the prospecting licence;

iv) Another anomaly noticed in the operation is that though the Applicant was aware about the discovery of iron ore

before 1819/2006, which is established by his letter dated 1819/2006 seeking inclusion of iron ore tor grant of

mining lease the applicant has reported the same in her prospecting report dated 6/2/2007. However, no report was

made under rule 14(1)(v) to report the prospecting of iron. Therefore, it is a violation of rule 14(1)(v) of MCR, 1960.

Hence, it is proved that the application for prospecting license is made only to have preferential rights for mining

lease as specified in rue 11(1) of MMDR Act in order to circumvent the provision of 11 (3) & 11(4) of MMDR Act,

1957.

c) Regarding submission of revised sketch for an area of 77 acres by the applicant it is seen that, in survey number

150 of Jammapura village, an extent of 314.15 acres is available out of which 237.15 acres is in the name of Forest

Page 13: ¨ÁUÀ 1 - KarPage-81-124).pdf · 22/01/2015  · (e) Shri E. Rama Murthy had submitted a revised sketch on 31/5/2002 reducing the area to an extent of 380 acres. It was found that

sÁUÀ 1 PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ, d£ÀªÀj 22, 2015 93Department and 77 acres is in the name of Revenue Department (Gomala). Hence the applicant in his revised

sketch has applied for the total extent of revenue land.

d) Regarding argument of the Applicant to consider the order of the Secretary made on 30/8/2013, it is opined that the

order was not maintainable as the approval of the Government was not taken. The Government Notification dated

16/1/2007 empowers the Secretary to Government to give an opportunity of being heard as provided under Rule

26(1) of MCR, 1960.

8) With all the above, it is concluded that the prospecting license is granted wrongly to the Applicant by not taking other

applications made pursuant to the notification into consideration, and the application for grant of mining lease is made even though the

prospecting work has not been carried out by the Applicant as stipulated in MCR, 1960. Hence, it would be appropriate to consider the

request of the Director, Department of Mines and Geology to recall the proposal of recommendation made to the Government of India

for grant of mining lease in favour of Smt R. Kasturi Radhakrishnan. Hence the following order.

GOVERNMENT ORDER No: CI 274 MMM 2008, BENGALURU, DATED 12th

NOVEMBER 2014

In view of the above, in respect of Mining Lease Application No. 911- AML-2005 filed by Smt. R. Kasturi Radhakrishnan for

grant of mining lease in survey number 150 of Jammapura Village, Jagalur Taluk, Davanagere District over an area of 31.16 hectares

for manganese ore and iron ore, the Government hereby orders:

a) To accept the proposal of the Director, Department of Mines and Geology for recalling the recommendation made to

the Government of India for grant of mining lease in favour of Smt. Kasturi over an extent of 77 acres for

manganese are and iron are; and

b) Also to withdraw the notification dated 31/12/1980, with the approval of Government of India and freshly notify the

same for disposing off the mining lease rights.

PR. 811

SC. 100

By Order and in the name of the Governor of Karnataka

E. SHIVARUDRAPPA

Under Secretary to Government (Mines)

Commerce and Industries Department

COMMERCE AND INDUSTRIES SECRETARIAT

Subject : Mining Lease No. 2665 granted in favour of M/s Shreesha Enterprises Private Limited for

Iron ore and Manganese ore over an area of 16.19 hectares in Survey Number 69 of

Sadarahalli and Suvery Number 11 of Keshavapura villages of Holalkere Taluk, Chitradurga

District – Regarding.

READ :

1) Communications from Director, Department of Mines & Geology

a) No. DMGI MLS/ ML-2665/2012/6049-52, dated 18/1/2012

b) No. DMGI MLS/ ML-2665/2012-13, dated 24/11/2012

c) No. DMGI MLS/ML-2665/2012-13, dated 5/12/2012

d) No. DMGI MLS/ML-2665/2014-15, dated 18/7/2014

e) No. DMGI MLS/ ML-2665/2014-15, dated 8/8/2014

2) GOK Notification No. CI 349 MMM 2007, dated 8/2/2008

3) Letter No. A6-Sheesha-Mines-Others/2012-13, dated 4/2/2013 from Deputy

Conservator of Forests, Chitradurga Division, Chitradurga

4) Written statement dated 2/8/2014 by Mis Shreesha Enterprises Private Limited

(Lessee of ML No. 2665)

PREAMBLE :

Director, Department of Mines & Geology vide his letters read at (1) above has recommended for the termination of mining

lease No. 2665, granted and renewed for a period of 20 years with effect from 1/3/2008 in favour of M/s Shreesha Enterprises Private

Limited for Iron ore and Manganese ore over a total area of 16.19 hectares in Survey Number 69 of Sadarahalli and Survey Number 11

of Keshavapura villages of Holalkere Taluk, Chitradurga District. Contentions raised by the Director, Mines and Geology Department,

vide his letters read at (1) above, are as follows:

(a) Deputy Commissioner, Chitradurga in his letter dated 19/4/2007 had recommended for grant of mining lease stating

that the land was not a forest land or patta land and belongs to Government.

Page 14: ¨ÁUÀ 1 - KarPage-81-124).pdf · 22/01/2015  · (e) Shri E. Rama Murthy had submitted a revised sketch on 31/5/2002 reducing the area to an extent of 380 acres. It was found that

PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ, d£ÀªÀj 22, 2015 sÁUÀ 1 94 (b) Deputy Conservator of Forest, Chitradurga in his letter dated 3/8/2011 had recommended for cancellation of mining

lease, stating that land in Number 69 of Sadarahalli is notified as forest land and land in Survey Number 11 of

Keshavapura is reserved forest land, and no permission is obtained for mining.

(c) A notice was issued to the lessee to show cause as to why the mining lease should not be cancelled since land in

Number 69 of Sadarahalli is notified as forest land and land in Survey Number 11of Keshavapura is reserved forest

land, and no perrmssion is obtained for mining as recommended by the Deputy Conservator of Forest, Chitradurga

in his letter dated 3/8/2011.

(d) The lessee submitted that he would commence mining after obtaining forest clearance, but did not submit time limit

and more over the reply given by the lessee was not satisfactory.

(e) To another notice, the lessee submitted that the land in Survey Number 69 of Sadarahalli and Survey Number 11 of

Keshavapura is revenue land, but on examination the reply was not found satisfactory.

(f) If the mining lease is not cancelled, it would lead to unauthorized mining.

2) The Deputy Conservator of Forests, Chitradurga Division, Chitradurga in his letter dated 4/2/2013, read at (3) above, has

stated that land in survey number 69 of Sadarahalli measuring 330-01 acres is declared as forest area and as such prior approval of the

Government of India for mining activities was necessary. He further stated that out of 77-33 acres of land in survey number 11 of

Keshavapur, 20 acres is shown as forest area in the relevant RTC, and location of 20 acres of forest area is not ear-marked. In view of

this Deputy Conservator of Forests, Chitradurga Division, Chitradurga has recommended for cancellation of mining lease granted in

these survey numbers.

3) Based on the recommendation of the Director, Department of Mines & Geology, as mentioned above, notice was issued

to the lessee affording him an opportunity to put forth his arguments. Hearing was conducted on 21/7/2014, 2/8/2014 and 1218/2014.

The lessee, in his written argument has submitted as follows:

a) That the prior consent of Central Government has been taken for grant of mining lease. The Deputy Commissioner,

Chitradurga has given NOC based on the report of Assistant Commissioner.

b) The State Government notified the renewal of mining lease on 8/2/2008 for a period of 20 years. The CEC has

classified it as 'A' category. The R&R has been commissioned for which there is obstruction from the Forest officials.

c) The Forest Department making a notification u/s 4 of Karnataka Forest Act has to appoint a Forest Settlement

Officer who will issue notification publicly in the area calling for objections to the notification as per section 5. After

receiving the claims the same will be disposed as per section 9 and declare the area as Forest uls 17. Only after the

notification u/s 17 and another notification, which is to be published by the Deputy Commissioner in local language,

are done the land will be classified as Forest Land. In this case only notification u/s 4 is issued whereas the other

procedures have not been carried out and hence the said land cannot be considered as forest land.

d) The lessee has also submits that if the State Government takes a stand that it is a Forest land, the lessee is ready

to obtain the permission u/s 2 of the Karnataka Forest Act.

4) Based on the reports of Director, Department of Mines & Geology; Deputy Conservator of Forests, Chitradurga Division,

Chitradurga and submission of the Applicant (M/s Shreesha Enterprises Private Limited), the following facts emerge:

a) The renewal notification is done on 8/2/2008 according sanctioning first renewal in favour of M/s Shreesha

Enterprises Private Limited. In the notification survey numbers 69 of Sadarahalli village and 11 of Keshavapura

village are only mentioned hence the limitation to the above two survey number. The area of mining lease grantedl

renewed is 19-08 acres in survey number 69 of Sadarahalli village and an area of 20.32 acres in survey number 11

of Keshavapura village.

b) The Deputy Conservator of Forest in his report dated 4/2/2013 has submitted that for survey number 69 of

Sadarahalli village the Government of Karnataka issued notification reserving the extent of 330-01 acres as Forest

on 3/4/1979 u/s 4 of Karnataka Forest Act 1963. As per the present RTC it is seen that only 200 acres of land is in

the name of the Forest, 29.20 acres in the name of Government and the remaining extent in the name of different

pattadars. The area given for mining lease in this survey number is 19-08 acres.

c) The Lessee in his reply to the notice of the Director has stated that the State Government on 17/9/1991 has ordered

for retransfer of C & D class land to Revenue Department, which was earlier transferred to Forest Department. The

revenue Department in survey number 69 of Sadarahalli village resumedlvested to itself 103-01 acres out of 303-01

acres of land in survey number 69 According to the Lessee 19-08 acres of mining lease area falls in 103-01

acres.

d) In survey number 11 of Keshavapura village 20 acres out of 77-33 acres has a mention as Forest in the RTC for

which the Revenue Department has not provided any sketch to the Forest Department to show in which part the

said Forest land is located. The DCF has concluded that this is not declared as Forest. In the present RTC dated

14/8/2014 an extent of 52.31 acres is mentioned as Kharab (hullubani kharab), 20-00 acres in the name of Forest

Page 15: ¨ÁUÀ 1 - KarPage-81-124).pdf · 22/01/2015  · (e) Shri E. Rama Murthy had submitted a revised sketch on 31/5/2002 reducing the area to an extent of 380 acres. It was found that

sÁUÀ 1 PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ, d£ÀªÀj 22, 2015 95and an extent of 2.12 acres and 2.30 acres granted in the name of pattadars. The exact location as to where the

Forest land lies has to be identified.

e) The Government in its letter dated 18/3/2014 had formed a Committee under the chairmanship of Deputy

Commissioner, Chitradurga to ascertain the status of the land. The Deputy Commissioner, Chitradurga in his letter

dated 25/4/2014 has opined that based on the Revenue, Forest and Mines and Geology Department report a Joint

Survey Team comprising of Forest, Revenue and Survey Department was formed to give a report after making joint

measurement. The following is the gist of the report.

i) Regarding survey number 69 of Sadarahalli village, as per the second re-classification, the extent of land is

307-01 acres out of which 92-26 acres have been granted, sub-division has been done for 19-30 acres,

subdivision has not been done for 72-36 acres, 71-16 acres has been in possession of unauthorized

occupation and in the remaining 142.39 acres shrubs and rock hill are found. Though notification is done as

per rule 4 of Forest Act 1963 there is no final notification, and, neither settlement orders is issued nor the

land has been taken into physical possession of Forest department or any development made. As per the

revenue records at present an extent of 295-12 acres is available out of which 200 acres is in the name of

Forest, and out of the remaining an extent of 19-08 acres is in the name of M/s. Shreesha Enterprises as

mining leases.

ii) Regarding survey number 11 of Keshavapura village there is an extent of 81-30 acres of Kharab land and

no notification is issued from the Forest department declaring it as Forest. This land has been classified as

C and D class land. Entry to the extent of 20-00 acres in the name of Forest is made in the RTC and 52-31

acres is recorded as Hullubani Kharab.

f) In survey number 11 of Keshavapura, as per the DCF, Chitradurga, there is no notification made by the Forest

Department under the Forest Act to consider it as a reserved I protected. However an area of 20 acres which is

C and D class land has been transferred to the Forest Department vide Government Order No. RD 106 LAP 88,

dated 7/6/1993 and the same is incorporated in the RTC vide MR number 0/1993-94 dated 27/1/1994 and the

demarcation has not been done. The area so transferred to the Forest Department in para 11 (b) has defined

"forest" for the purpose of Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 as follows:

Area recorded as 'forest in the Government record: All the land parcels that are recorded as

forest, aranya, kadu, marakadu, jungle etc., (i) in the land record (RTC, pahani etc.) maintained

under the provisions of Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 (Act No. 12 of 1964) and allied

statutes till 30th June, 1981; (if) All classes of lands in the survey settlement records prepared

during the process of land revenue settlement.

Going by this term, the Government Order has been issued after 30th June, 1981 transferring the said 'C' & 'D'

class land to the Forest and subsequently the mutation has been carried out. The demarcation of area transferred to

Forest Department and the area where grant is made in favour of M/s Shreesha Enterprises Private Limited has to

be carried out, and after such demarcation if it is found that there is overlap in area earmarked as Forest, then all

clearances from the concerned authorities has to be obtained before starting the mining activities.

g) In survey number 69 of Sadarahalli village it is seen that notification uls 4 of the Forest Act has been made for an

area of 303-01 acres on 3/4/1979. Even though the final notification has not been done as submitted by the Lessee

it is seen that once the notification uls 4 is made the land status will change as Forest. Hence the extent of area in

survey number 69 of Sadarahalli village is to be considered as Forest. Before carrying out any mining activity the

Forest Clearance under Section 2 of the Forest Act has to be complied with.

h) It would also be proper to direct the Lessee to produce the R and R plan from the competent authority and to

effectively implement the same.

5) For the reasons mentioned above, it would not be appropriate to terminate the mining lease, and hence the following

order.

GOVERNMENT ORDER No. CI 30 MMM 2012, BENGALURU, DATED 7TH NOVEMBER, 2014

In view of the above, with respect to Mining Lease No. 2665 of M/s. Shreesha Enterprises Private Limited for Iron ore and

Manganese ore over an area of 16.19 hectares in Survey Number 69 of Sadarahalli and Survey Number 11 of Keshavapura villages of

Holalkere Taluk, Chitradurga District, the Government hereby orders:

a) To reject the recommendation of Director, Mines and Geology regarding the termination of mining lease.

b) To direct the Lessee to obtain Forest Clearance from Ministry of Environment and Forest, Government of India for

survey number 69 of Sadarahalli village, Holalkere taluk, Chitradurga District.

c) To demarcate the land in survey number 11 of Keshavapura and, if any overlap is found on the area earmarked as

Forest, to obtain all the statutory clearances.

Page 16: ¨ÁUÀ 1 - KarPage-81-124).pdf · 22/01/2015  · (e) Shri E. Rama Murthy had submitted a revised sketch on 31/5/2002 reducing the area to an extent of 380 acres. It was found that

PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ, d£ÀªÀj 22, 2015 sÁUÀ 1 96 d) To allow the lessee to start the mining operation after getting all clearances and submission of statutory documents

if any.

PR. 812

SC. 100

By Order and in the name of the Governor of Karnataka

E. SHIVARUDRAPPA

Under Secretary to Government (Mines)

Commerce and Industries Department

HOME SECRETARIAT

Subject : Constitution of a Committee for Review of Acquitted cases.

READ :

Directions of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in W.P.No.1485/2008,

dated 07-01-2014

PREAMBLE :

The Hon'ble Supreme Court in its direction dated 07-01-2014 in Writ Petition No.1485/2008 has taken very serious note of the

large number of acquittals that were happening in various criminal cases across India. The judgment specifically highlighted the

inadequacies of investigation and inability of the prosecution in presenting the cases before the trial courts. The Hon 'ble Supreme Court

issued specific directions as follows:

1. Form a standing committee of senior officers of the police and prosecution departments to examine all orders of

acquittal and to record reasons for the failure of each prosecution case. The committee will consolidate various

reasons for failure in prosecution of cases and, crystallize the various mistakes committed during investigation,

and/or prosecution, or both.

2. The Home Department of every State Government will incorporate in its existing training programmes for junior

investigation/prosecution officials course-content drawn from the above consideration. The same should also

constitute course-content of refresher training programmes, for senior investigation/prosecuting officials. The above

responsibility for preparing training programmes for officials, should be vested in the same committee of senior

officers referred to above. The course content will be reviewed by the committee annually, on the basis of fresh

inputs, including emerging scientific tools of investigation, judgments of Courts, and on the basis of experiences

gained by the standing committee while exammmg failures, m unsuccessful prosecution of cases.

3. The court further directed, that the above trammg programme be put in place within 6 months. This would ensure

that those persons who handle sensitive matters concerning investigation/prosecution are fully trained to handle the

same. Thereupon, if any lapses are committed by them, they would not be able to feign innocence, when they are

made liable to suffer departmental action, for their lapses.

4. The Home Department of every State Government has been directed to formulate a procedure for taking action

against all such erring officials/officers indentified, as responsible for failure of a culpable lapses, must suffer

departmental action. The mechanism formulated would infuse seriousness in the performance of investigating and

prosecuting duties, and would ensure that investigation and prosecution are purposeful and decisive. The instant

direction shall also be given effect to within 6 months.

The Government of Karnataka has considered the directions of the Hon'ble Supreme Court and has decided to implement the

directions to strengthen the investigation and prosecution after putting in place an administrative structure to study all the acquittals of

criminal cases in the state of Karnataka from time to time and recommend remedial action which would include disciplinary action

against erring investigation officers and prosecutors, learning from acquittals to be incorporated in training programmes of investigating

officers and prosecutors and mechanism for taking action against the erring officers.

GOVERNMENT ORDER NO.HD 126 CWP 2014 DATED 20-10- 2014

The Government of Karnataka from time to time has issued instructions to both the Police and Prosecution Department on the

process of ensuring quality investigation, effective criminal trials and follow up review for the acquitted cases. Superseding all the earlier

circulars, it is hereby decided to constitute "Karnataka State Criminal Acquittals Review Committee".

The Committee will be a three level structure with

A) State Level Criminal Acquittals Review Committee

B) Range LeveliCommissionerate Level Acquittals Review Committee

C) District Level Acquittals Review Committee

i) State Level Criminal Acquittals Review Committee.

The Committee will be headed by the Chairman with the Additional Director General of Police, Crime and Technical Services,

Bangalore; Director, Karnataka Police Academy, Mysore and, Director of Prosecution, Bangalore as Members.

Page 17: ¨ÁUÀ 1 - KarPage-81-124).pdf · 22/01/2015  · (e) Shri E. Rama Murthy had submitted a revised sketch on 31/5/2002 reducing the area to an extent of 380 acres. It was found that

sÁUÀ 1 PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ, d£ÀªÀj 22, 2015 97The Committee shall undertake the following Roles and functions:

1. Undertake review of all cases of acquittals in which glaring commissions and omissions were observed by the

Hon'ble High Court(s) and, Supreme Court, with respect of investigation and prosecution.

2. Undertake review of all cases of acquittals in cases under Unlawful Activities Prevention Act, Karnataka Control of

Organized Crime Act, and, Fake Indian Currency Notes (FICN) cases in which glaring commissions and omissions

were observed during trial with respect to investigation and prosecution.

3. Undertake review of all cases of acquittals in cases under special acts of all the wings of the Government,

Committee, Corporations and, Karnataka Lokayuktha in which glaring commissions and omissions were observed

during trial with respect to investigation and prosecution.

4. Undertake review of important cases of acquittals as deemed fit, based on reference from Government or

suo-moto.

5. Recommend action against erring investigating officers and, prosecutors responsible for glaring omissions and,

commissrons leading to acquittal to the concerned administrative heads of the department.

6. Undertake a review of the decisions taken by the Range/District Level Committees on a quarterly basis, and,

suggest remedies, if any.

7. Submit a quarterly report of the reviews & recommendations done by the Committee to the Government for its

consideration.

8. Compile the learnings from the review of the acquitted cases and finalize the training content for the investigators

and, prosecutors. Such compilations done, once every six months, shall be incorporated into the training( s) in

Police and, Prosecution Department.

ii) Range Level Criminal Acquittals Review Committee.

The Range Level Committee will be headed by the Inspector General of Police of the concerned range and in the

Commissionerates the Commissioner of Police will head the Committee. The Law officer Senior will be the member

of the regional Committee and the DYSP in the office of the I.G.P and, in case of Commissionerate it will be the

D.C.P. Crime who will be a member.

The Range Level Criminal Acquittals Review Committee shall undertake the following Roles and functions:

1. Undertake review of all cases of acquittals attracting punishment of seven years and, more (expect those cases

which are under the exclusive jurisdiction the State Committee) and, identify glaring commissions and omissions

during trial with respect to investigation and prosecution and recommend action on the concerned officers.

2. Undertake a review of the decisions taken by the Range/District Level Committees on a quarterly basis, and,

suggest remedies, if any.

3. Submit a quarterly report of the reviews & recommendations done by the Committee to the Government for its

consideration.

The District Level Criminal Acquittals Review Committee consists of the following:

The District Level Committee will be headed by the Additional S.P. of the District concerned with the senior most Public

Prosecutor of the District as member and the DYSP/Police Inspector of the District Crime Records Bureau (DCRB) as a member.

The District Level Criminal Acquittals Review Committee shall undertake the following Roles and functions:

Responsibilities:

1. Undertake review of all cases of acquittals attracting punishment of less than seven years, all IMV and, Karnataka

Police Act cases and, identify glaring commissions and omissions during trial with respect to investigation and

prosecution and recommend action on the concerned officers.

2. Submit a monthly report of the reviews done by the Committee to the Range Level Committee for its consideration.

The Karnataka State Criminal Acquittals Review Committee shall prepare an Annual Report and submit the same to the Home

Department.

PR. 834

SC. 200

By Order and in the name of the Governor of Karnataka

MEENA NAGARAJ

Deputy Secretary to Government (L & O)

Home Department

Page 18: ¨ÁUÀ 1 - KarPage-81-124).pdf · 22/01/2015  · (e) Shri E. Rama Murthy had submitted a revised sketch on 31/5/2002 reducing the area to an extent of 380 acres. It was found that

PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ, d£ÀªÀj 22, 2015 sÁUÀ 1 98

£ÀUÀgÁ©üªÀÈ¢Þ ÀaªÁ®AiÀÄ

«µÀAiÀÄ: aPÀ̧¼Áî¥ÀÄgÀ f Éè, aAvÁªÀÄt ¥ÀlÖtzÀ ¸ÀܽÃAiÀÄ AiÉÆÃd£Á ¥ÀæzÉñÀzÀ ªÀĺÁAiÉÆÃd£É (¥ÀjµÀÌøvÀ-1) vÁvÁÌ°PÀ C£ÀĪÉÆÃzÀ£ÉUÁV ¤ÃqÀĪÀ §UÉÎ.

NzÀ¯ÁVzÉ:

1. ¸ÀzÀ Àå-PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð, AiÉÆÃd£Á ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀ, aAvÁªÀÄt EªÀgÀ ¥ÀvÀæ ¸ÀASÉå : £ÀAiÉÆÃ¥Áæ/ ÉA/ ªÀÄAiÉÆÃ¥Áæ/1/2013-14/72, ¢£ÁAPÀ 09-12-2013 ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ¢£ÁAPÀ 20-02-2014.

2. £ÀUÀgÀ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ UÁæªÀiÁAvÀgÀ AiÉÆÃd£Á ¤zÉÃð±ÀPÀgÀÄ EªÀgÀ KPÀ PÀqÀvÀ ¸ÀASÉå : £ÀUÁæAiÉÆà (28)/ ÉA«/aªÀÄAiÉÆÃ(¥À-1)/2014-15, ¢£ÁAPÀ 12-05-2014.

¥Àç¸ÁÛªÀ£É:

ªÉÄÃ É PÀæ.¸ÀA. (1) NzÀ ÁzÀ ¥ÀvÀæzÀ°è ¸ÀzÀ Àå-PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð, AiÉÆÃd£Á ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀ, aAvÁªÀÄt EªÀgÀÄ aAvÁªÀÄt ¥ÀlÖtzÀ ¸ÀܽÃAiÀÄ AiÉÆÃd£Á ¥ÀæzÉñÀzÀ ªÀĺÁ AiÉÆÃd£É (¥ÀjµÀÌøvÀ-1)AiÀÄ £ÀPÉë ºÁUÀÆ ªÀgÀ¢AiÀÄ£ÀÄß vÀAiÀiÁj¹ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀzÀ ¸À sÉAiÀÄ°è ªÀÄAr¹ ²¥sÁgÀ¹ì£ÉÆA¢UÉ ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ vÁvÁÌ°PÀ C£ÀĪÉÆÃzÀ£ÉUÁV ¥Àæ¸ÁÛªÀ£ÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¸À°è¹gÀÄvÁÛgÉ.

ªÉÄÃ É PÀæªÀĸÀA. 2 gÀ°è NzÀ ÁzÀ £ÀUÀgÀ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ UÁæªÀiÁAvÀgÀ AiÉÆÃd£Á ¤zÉÃð±ÀPÀgÀ PÀbÉÃjAiÀÄ KPÀ PÀqÀvÀzÀ°è, ªÀÄÄA¢£À AiÉÆÃd£Á CªÀ¢üUÉ CAzÀgÉ 2031gÀ ªÉüÉUÉ ¥ÀlÖtzÀ d£À ÀASÉåAiÀÄÄ 1,35,000 DUÀ§ºÀÄzÉAzÀÄ CAzÁf¹ ªÀĺÁ AiÉÆÃd£É (¥ÀjµÀÌøvÀ-1) vÀAiÀiÁj¸À¯ÁVzÉ. aAvÁªÀÄt ¥ÀlÖtzÀ ¸ÀܽÃAiÀÄ AiÉÆÃd£Á ¥ÀæzÉñÀzÀ 16.98 ZÀ.Q.«ÄÃ. «¹ÛÃtðzÀ°è 1312.09 ºÉPÉÖÃgï ¥ÀæzÉñÀªÀ£ÀÄß £ÀUÀjÃPÀgÀtzÀ J ÉèAiÉÄAzÀÄ ¥Àæ¸ÁÛ¦¹ ªÀĺÁ AiÉÆÃd£É (¥ÀjµÀÌøvÀ-1)AiÀÄ£ÀÄß gÀƦ¸À ÁVzÉ. PÀ£ÁðlPÀ £ÀUÀgÀ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ UÁæªÀiÁAvÀgÀ AiÉÆÃd£Á PÁAiÉÄÝ, 1961gÀ PÀ®A 12 gÀ°è£À CA±ÀUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¥ÀjUÀt¹ aAvÁªÀÄt ¥ÀlÖtzÀ AiÉÆÃfvÀ ɼÀªÀtÂUÁV ¥Àæ¸ÁÛ¦¹gÀĪÀ ¥ÀæzÉñÀzÀ°è ªÀ ÀwUÁV 734.28 ºÉPÉÖÃgï (±ÉÃ.55.96), ªÁtÂdåPÁÌV 47.71 ºÉPÉÖÃgï (±ÉÃ. 3.64), PÉÊUÁjPÉUÁV 101.80 ºÉPÉÖÃgï (±ÉÃ.7.76), ¸ÁªÀðd¤PÀ/CgÉ ¸ÁªÀðd¤PÀPÉÌ 41.88 ºÉPÉÖÃgï (±ÉÃ.3.19), GzÁå£ÀªÀ£À ªÀÄvÀÄÛ §AiÀÄ®Ä eÁUÀUÀ½UÉ 146.20 ºÉPÉÖÃgï (±ÉÃ.11.14) ¸ÁªÀðd¤PÀ G¥ÀAiÀÄÄPÀÛvÉUÉ 7.10 ºÉPÉÖÃgï (±ÉÃ.0.54) ºÁUÀÆ ¸ÁjUÉ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ¸ÀA¥ÀPÀð ªÀ®AiÀÄPÉÌ 233.12 ºÉPÉÖÃgï (±ÉÃ.17.77) PÁ¬ÄÝj¹zÀÄÝ, ¤Ãj¤AzÀ DªÀÈvÀªÁzÀ ¥ÀæzÉñÀªÀ£ÀÄß sÀÆ «±ÉèÃóµÀuÉAiÀÄ°è ¥ÀjUÀt¹gÀĪÀÅ¢®è. ªÀĺÁ AiÉÆÃd£É (¥ÀjµÀÌøvÀ-1)AiÀÄ£ÀÄß C£ÀĵÁ×£ÀPÉÌ vÀgÀ®Ä CUÀvÀå«gÀĪÀ ªÀ®AiÀÄ ¤AiÀĪÀiÁªÀ½UÀ¼À£ÀÄß

gÀƦ¸À ÁVzÉ. ¸ÀzÀj ªÀĺÁ AiÉÆÃd£ÉUÉ PÀ£ÁðlPÀ £ÀUÀgÀ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ UÁæªÀiÁAvÀgÀ AiÉÆÃd£Á PÁAiÉÄÝ, 1961gÀ PÀ®A 13(1) gÀ£ÀéAiÀÄ ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ vÁvÁÌ°PÀ C£ÀĪÉÆÃzÀ£É ¤ÃqÀĪÀAvÉ ¸ÀPÁðgÀPÉÌ ¥Àæ¸ÁÛªÀ£ÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¸À°è¹gÀÄvÁÛgÉ. ¥Àæ¸ÁÛªÀ£ÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¸ÀPÁðgÀªÀÅ PÀÆ®APÀµÀªÁV ¥Àj²Ã°¹ F PɼÀPÀAqÀAvÉ DzÉò¹zÉ.

¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ DzÉñÀ ¸ÀASÉå: £ÀCE 127 ÉAgÀÆ¥Áæ 2014, ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ, ¢£ÁAPÀ: 18-11-2014

ªÉÄÃ É ¥Àæ¸ÁÛªÀ£ÉAiÀÄ°è «ªÀj¹gÀĪÀ CA±ÀUÀ¼À »£Éß ÉAiÀÄ°è aPÀ̧¼Áî¥ÀÄgÀ f Éè, aAvÁªÀÄt ¥ÀlÖtzÀ ¸ÀܽÃAiÀÄ AiÉÆÃd£Á ¥ÀæzÉñÀzÀ ªÀĺÁ AiÉÆÃd£É (¥ÀjµÀÌøvÀ-1) 2031 PÉÌ PÀ£ÁðlPÀ £ÀUÀgÀ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ UÁæªÀiÁAvÀgÀ AiÉÆÃd£Á PÁAiÉÄÝ, 1961gÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀt 13(1)gÀ£ÀéAiÀÄ F PɼÀV£À ¤§AzsÀ£ÉUÀ½UÉƼÀ¥ÀlÄÖ vÁvÁÌ°PÀ C£ÀĪÉÆÃzÀ£ÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¤ÃqÀ ÁVzÉ. ¸ÀzÀj ªÀĺÁAiÉÆÃd£ÉAiÀÄ CAwªÀÄ C£ÀĪÉÆÃzÀ£ÉUÉ ¸À°è ÀĪÁUÀ F PɼÀV£À CA±ÀUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¥ÀjUÀt¹ CUÀvÀå wzÀÄÝ¥ÀrUÀ¼À£ÀÄß C¼ÀªÀr¹PÉƼÀîvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ.

1. ªÀ®AiÀÄ ¤AiÀĪÀiÁªÀ½UÀ¼À°è£À ¥ÀÄl¸ÀASÉå : 113 gÀ°è£À n¥Ààt 1 jAzÀ 3 gÀªÀgÉV£À CA±ÀUÀ¼À£ÀÄß AiÉÆÃd£Á ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀPÉÌ C£ÀéAiÀĪÁUÀĪÀAvÉ ¸ÀÆPÀÛªÁV ªÀiÁ¥Àðr¸ÀvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ.

2. ªÀ®AiÀÄ ¤AiÀĪÀiÁªÀ½UÀ¼À°è ¥ÀÄl ¸ÀASÉå : 119 gÀ°è PÀæªÀÄ ¸ÀASÉå 7.b1 gÀ°è£À n¥ÀàtÂAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ºÉÆgÀvÀÄ¥Àr¸ÀvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ.

3. ªÀ®AiÀÄ ¤AiÀĪÀiÁªÀ½UÀ¼À°è£À ¥ÀÄl ¸ÀASÉå : 124 gÀ°è£À n¥Ààt (iv) ºÉÆgÀvÀÄ¥Àr¸ÀvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ.

4. ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ C¢ü¸ÀÆZÀ£É ¸ÀASÉå : £ÀCE 162 ÉAgÀÆ¥Áæ 2011 ¢£ÁAPÀ 14-09-2012 gÀ£ÀéAiÀÄ 4000.0 ZÀ.«ÄÃ. CxÀªÁ CzÀQÌAvÀ PÀrªÉÄ EgÀĪÀAvÀºÀ d«ÄãÀÄUÀ½UÉ §ºÀÄ ¤ªÉñÀ£À ªÀ Àw «£Áå¸À C£ÀĪÉÆâ¸ÀĪÁUÀ ±ÉÃ. 15 gÀµÀÄÖ eÁUÀªÀ£ÀÄß GzÁå£ÀªÀ£À G¥ÀAiÉÆÃUÀPÁÌV PÁ¬ÄÝj¸ÀĪÀÅzÀ£ÀÄß PÀqÁØAiÀÄUÉƽ¹ ¸ÀPÁðgÀ¢AzÀ ºÉÆgÀr¹gÀĪÀ C¢ü¸ÀÆZÀ£É ¸ÀASÉå : £ÀCE : 162 : ÉAgÀÆ¥Áæ: 2011, ¢£ÁAPÀ 14-09-2012 £ÀÄß ªÀ®AiÀÄ ¤AiÀĪÀiÁªÀ½AiÀÄ sÁUÀªÁV ¥ÀjUÀt ÀvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ.

5. ªÀgÀ¢ ¥ÀÄl ¸ÀASÉå : 96 gÀ°è "Two Truck Terminals" §zÀ ÁV ªÀĺÁAiÉÆÃd£Á £ÀPÉëAiÀÄ°è UÀÄgÀÄw¸ÀĪÀAvÉ ¸ÀÆPÀÛªÁV ªÀiÁ¥Àðr¸ÀvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ.

6. ªÀgÀ¢ ¥ÀÄl ¸ÀASÉå : 97 £ÀÄß PÉ.n.¹.¦. PÁAiÉÄÝAiÀÄ°è£À CªÀPÁ±ÀzÀAvÉ ¸ÀÆPÀÛªÁV ªÀiÁ¥Àðr¸ÀvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ. ºÁUÀÆ CzÀPÀÌ£ÀÄUÀÄtªÁV Contents ¥ÀÄlzÀ°è CzsÁåAiÀÄ-9 £ÀÄß ¸ÀÆPÀÛªÁV ªÀiÁ¥Àðr¸ÀvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ.

Page 19: ¨ÁUÀ 1 - KarPage-81-124).pdf · 22/01/2015  · (e) Shri E. Rama Murthy had submitted a revised sketch on 31/5/2002 reducing the area to an extent of 380 acres. It was found that

sÁUÀ 1 PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ, d£ÀªÀj 22, 2015 99

ªÀĺÁ AiÉÆÃd£É (¥ÀjµÀÌøvÀ-1) UÉ, vÁvÁÌ°PÀ C£ÀĪÉÆÃzÀ£É ¤ÃrzÀ UÀÄgÀÄvÁV ªÀgÀ¢ ºÁUÀÆ £ÀPÉëUÀ¼À ªÉÄÃ É ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ ªÀÄÄzÉæAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ºÁPÀ ÁVzÉ.

PR. 883

SC. 100

PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥Á®gÀ DeÁÕ£ÀĸÁgÀ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ CªÀgÀ ºÉ Àj£À°è «. gÁeÉÃAzÀæ

¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ C¢üãÀ PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð £ÀUÀgÁ©üªÀÈ¢Þ E¯ÁSÉ

C®à ÀASÁåvÀgÀ PÀ¯Áåt ÀaªÁ®AiÀÄ

«µÀAiÀÄ: C®à¸ÀASÁåvÀgÀ PÀ Áåt E¯ÁSÉAiÀÄ ««zsÀ PÁAiÀÄðPÀæªÀÄ/AiÉÆÃd£ÉUÀ½UÉ ¤UÀ¢¥Àr¹gÀĪÀ PÀÄlÄA§zÀ ªÁ¶ðPÀ DzÁAiÀÄ «ÄwUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¥ÀjµÀÌj¸ÀĪÀ §UÉÎ.

NzÀ¯ÁVzÉ:

¤zÉÃð±ÀPÀgÀÄ, C®à¸ÀASÁåvÀgÀ PÀ Áåt E¯ÁSÉ, ÉAUÀ¼ÀÄgÀÄ gÀªÀgÀ KPÀPÀqÀvÀ ¸ÀASÉå : C¸ÀA¤/ DzÁAiÀÄ«Äw/¹Dgï-01/2014-15, ¢£ÁAPÀ 19-05-2014.

¥Àç¸ÁÛªÀ£É:

C®à¸ÀASÁåvÀgÀ PÀ Áåt E¯ÁSÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß »AzÀĽzÀ ªÀUÀðUÀ¼À PÀ Áåt E¯ÁSɬÄAzÀ ¨ÉÃ¥Àðr¹ 1999-2000 £Éà ¸Á°¤AzÀ C¹ÛvÀéPÉÌ vÀgÀ Á¬ÄvÀÄ. DUÀ »AzÀĽzÀ ªÀUÀðUÀ¼À PÀ Áåt E¯ÁSÉAiÀÄ°è EzÀÝAvÀºÀ C®à¸ÀASÁåvÀgÀ AiÉÆÃd£É/PÁAiÀÄðPÀæªÀÄUÀ¼À£ÀÄß C®à¸ÀASÁåvÀgÀ E¯ÁSÉUÉ ªÀUÁð¬Ä¸À Á¬ÄvÀÄ. E¯ÁSÉAiÀÄÄ ¥ÁægÀA sÀªÁV 15 ªÀµÀð ¥ÀÆtðUÉÆArgÀĪÀÅzÀÄ. DzÀgÉ E¯ÁSÁ PÁAiÀÄðPÀæªÀÄUÀ½UÉ CAzÀÄ ¤UÀ¢¥Àr¹zÀ DzÁAiÀÄ «ÄwAiÀÄ£Éßà FUÀ®Æ ¸ÀºÀ CzÉà DzÁAiÀÄ «ÄwAiÀÄ£ÀÄß C¼ÀªÀr¸À ÁUÀÄwÛzÉ. DzÀgÉ EwÛÃa£À ¢£ÀUÀ¼À°è J¯Áè ¸ÁªÀÄVæUÀ¼À zÀgÀUÀ¼ÀÄ ºÉZÁÑVzÀÄÝ, EzÀjAzÀ CAzÀÄ ¤UÀ¢¥Àr¹zÀ DzÁAiÀÄPÉÌ EA¢£À ¢£ÀUÀ¼À°è «zÁåyðUÀ¼ÀÄ/C sÀåyðUÀ¼ÀÄ C®à¸ÀASÁåvÀgÀ E¯ÁSÁ PÁAiÀÄðPÀæªÀÄUÀ½UÉ/«zÁåyð¤®AiÀÄUÀ½UÉ ¥ÀæªÉñÀ ¥ÀqÉAiÀÄ®Ä ¸Ë® sÀå ¥ÀqÉAiÀÄ®Ä ¸ÁzsÀåªÁUÀÄwÛ®è. EzÀjAzÀ E¯ÁSÁ ¥ÀæUÀwAiÀÄÄ PÀÄApvÀªÁVzÉ. EwÛÃa£À ¢£ÀUÀ¼À°è DVgÀĪÀ ºÀtzÀħâgÀªÀ£ÀÄß UÀªÀÄ£ÀzÀ°èj¹PÉÆAqÀÄ E¯ÁSÁ PÁAiÀÄðPÀæªÀÄUÀ½UÉ DzÁAiÀÄ «ÄwAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ºÉaѹzÀÝ°è, C®à¸ÀASÁåvÀgÀ ¸ÀªÀÄÄzÁAiÀÄzÀ §qÀªÀjUÉ ºÉaÑ£À ¸ÀASÉåAiÀÄ°è C®à¸ÀASÁåvÀgÀ AiÉÆÃd£ÉUÀ¼À ¸Ë® sÀåªÀ£ÀÄß zÉÆgÀQ¹ PÉÆqÀ®Ä ¸ÁzsÀåªÁUÀĪÀÅzÀjAzÀ, DzÁAiÀÄ «ÄwAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ºÉaÑ À®Ä PÉÆÃj ªÉÄÃ É NzÀ ÁzÀ PÀæ.¸ÀA. (1) gÀ°è ¤zÉÃð±ÀPÀgÀÄ, C®à¸ÀASÁåvÀgÀ ¤zÉÃð±À£Á®AiÀÄ, ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ. KPÀPÀqÀvÀzÀ°è ¸ÀPÁðgÀPÉÌ ¥Àæ¸ÁÛªÀ£ÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¸À°è¹gÀÄvÁÛgÉ.

¸ÀPÁðgÀªÀÅ ¸ÀzÀj ¥Àæ¸ÁÛªÀ£ÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß PÀÆ®APÀ±ÀªÁV ¥Àj²Ã°¹zÀÄÝ, C®à¸ÀASÁåvÀgÀ PÀ Áåt E¯ÁSÉAiÀÄ ¤zÉÃð±ÀPÀgÀÄ ¸À°è¹gÀĪÀ ¥Àæ¸ÁÛªÀ£ÉAiÀÄ ªÉÄÃgÉUÉ ºÁUÀÆ EwÛÃa£À ªÀµÀðUÀ¼À°è GAmÁVgÀĪÀ ºÀtzÀħâgÀªÀ£ÀÄß UÀªÀÄ£ÀzÀ°èj¹PÉÆAqÀÄ C®à¸ÀASÁåvÀgÀ ªÀUÀðUÀ¼À°è §qÀ «zÁåyðUÀ½UÉ ºÉaÑ£À C£ÀÄPÀÆ®UÀ¼À£ÀÄß PÀ°à¸ÀĪÀ »vÀzÀȶ׬ÄAzÀ E¯ÁSÉAiÀÄ ««zsÀ PÁAiÀÄðPÀæªÀÄ/AiÉÆÃd£ÉUÀ¼À°è£À ¸ÀªÀ®vÀÄÛUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¥ÀqÉzÀÄPÉƼÀÄîªÀ ¸À®ÄªÁV ºÁ° ¤UÀ¢¥Àr¹gÀĪÀ PÀÄlÄA§zÀ ªÁ¶ðPÀ DzÁAiÀÄ «ÄwAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¥ÀjµÀÌj¸À®Ä ¸ÀPÁðgÀªÀÅ ¤tð¬Ä¹zÉ. CzÀgÀAvÉ F DzÉñÀ.

¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ DzÉñÀ ¸ÀASÉå: MWD 21 MDS 2011, ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ, ¢£ÁAPÀ: 02-08-2014

¥Àæ¸ÁÛªÀ£ÉAiÀÄ°è «ªÀj¸À¯ÁzÀ CA±ÀUÀ¼À »£Éß ÉAiÀÄ°è, C®à¸ÀASÁåvÀgÀ ªÀUÀðUÀ¼À PÀ Áåt E¯ÁSÉAiÀÄ ««zsÀ AiÉÆÃd£É/PÁAiÀÄðPÀæªÀÄUÀ½UÉ ¥sÀ Á£ÀÄ sÀ«UÀ½UÉ FUÁUÀ Éà ¤UÀ¢¥Àr¸À ÁVzÀÝ PÀÄlÄA§zÀ ªÁ¶ðPÀ DzÁAiÀÄ «ÄwUÀ¼À£ÀÄß F DzÉñÀzÀ C£ÀħAzsÀzÀ°ègÀĪÀAvÉ vÀPÀët¢AzÀ eÁjUÉ §gÀĪÀAvÉ ¥ÀjµÀÌj¹ DzÉò¹zÉ.

««zsÀ PÁAiÀÄðPÀæªÀÄUÀ¼Àr ¥sÀ Á£ÀĨsÀ«UÀ¼À CºÀðvÉUÁV ¤UÀ¢¥Àr¹gÀĪÀ ªÁ¶ðPÀ DzÁAiÀÄzÀ «ÄwAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¸ÀA§AzsÀ¥ÀlÖ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀ¢AzÀ ¤UÀ¢¥Àr¹zÀ £ÀªÀÄÆ£ÉAiÀÄ°è ¥ÀqÉzÀÄ ªÀÄAr¸ÀĪÀ ¥sÀ¯Á£ÀÄ sÀ«UÀ¼À£ÀÄß ªÀiÁvÀæ ¤AiÀĪÀiÁ£ÀĸÁgÀ ¥ÀjUÀt ÀvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ. C®à¸ÀASÁåvÀgÀ PÀ Áåt E¯ÁSÉAiÀÄ°è£À J¯Áè AiÉÆÃd£ÉUÀ¼À°è ªÀÄwÃAiÀÄ C®à¸ÀASÁåvÀgÀ ¸ÀªÀÄÄzÁAiÀÄUÀ½AzÀ ªÀÄĹèA, Qæ²ÑAiÀÄ£ï, eÉÊ£ï, ¨ËzÀÝ, ¹Sï ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ¥Á¹ð d£ÁAUÀUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¥ÀjUÀt À ÁUÀĪÀÅzÀÄ.

F DzÉñÀªÀ£ÀÄß DyðPÀ E¯ÁSÉAiÀÄ n¥Ààt ¸ÀASÉå : CE-424 ªÉZÀÑ-3 2014, ¢£ÁAPÀ 03-07-2014 gÀ°è ¤ÃrgÀĪÀ ¸ÀºÀªÀÄwAiÀÄ£ÀéAiÀÄ ºÉÆgÀr¹zÉ.

PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥Á®gÀ DeÁÕ£ÀĸÁgÀ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ CªÀgÀ ºÉ Àj£À°è JA. £ÁUÀgÀvÀß

¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ G¥À PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð C®à¸ÀASÁåvÀgÀ PÀ Áåt E¯ÁSÉ

Page 20: ¨ÁUÀ 1 - KarPage-81-124).pdf · 22/01/2015  · (e) Shri E. Rama Murthy had submitted a revised sketch on 31/5/2002 reducing the area to an extent of 380 acres. It was found that

PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ, d£ÀªÀj 22, 2015 sÁUÀ 1 100

¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ DzÉñÀ ¸ÀASÉå : MWD 21 MDS 2011, ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ, ¢£ÁAPÀ 02-08-2014 PÉÌ

C£ÀħAzsÀ C®à ÀASÁåvÀgÀ PÀ¯Áåt E¯ÁSÉAiÀÄ ««zsÀ PÁAiÀÄðPÀæªÀÄ/AiÉÆÃd£ÉUÀ½UÉ ¤UÀ¢¥Àr¹zÀ

DzÁAiÀÄ «ÄwUÀ¼À «ªÀgÀ

PÀæªÀÄ ÀASÉå

AiÉÆÃd£ÉUÀ¼ÀÄ

¤UÀ¢¥Àr¹gÀĪÀ DzÁAiÀÄ «Äw

¥Àæ ÀªÀð-1gÀ°è §gÀĪÀ

(£ÀzÁ¥sï, ¦AeÁgÀ, zÀgÀªÉñï, ZÀ¥ÀàgÀ§Azï, PÀ¸Á§,

¥ÀƯïªÀiÁ°, (ªÀÄĹèA)

¥ÀæªÀUÀð-2J-¨sËzsÀÞ ÀªÀÄÄzÁAiÀÄ

¥ÀæªÀUÀð-2©- ªÀÄĹèA ÀªÀÄÄzÁAiÀÄ

¥ÀæªÀUÀð-3©- Qæ²ÑAiÀÄ£ï, eÉÊ£ï ÀªÀÄÄzÁAiÀÄ

¥Á¹ð, ¹Sï ÀªÀÄÄzÁAiÀÄ

I. PÉÃAzÀæ ªÀ®AiÀÄ AiÉÆÃd£ÉUÀ¼ÀÄ : PÉÃAzÀæ ÀPÁðgÀªÀÅ ¤UÀ¢ ¥Àr¹gÀĪÀ DzÁAiÀÄzÀ «ÄwAiÀÄAvÉ

1. C®à¸ÀASÁåvÀjUÁV ªÉÄnæPï ¥ÀƪÀð «zÁåyðªÉÃvÀ£À ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ¥ÉÆæÃvÁìºÀ

1.00 ®PÀë 1.00 ®PÀë

2 C®à¸ÀASÁåvÀjUÁV ªÉÄnæPï £ÀAvÀgÀzÀ «zÁåyðªÉÃvÀ£À ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ¥ÉÆæÃvÁìºÀ

2.00 ®PÀë 2.00 ®PÀë

3 ªÀÈwÛ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ vÁAwæPÀ PÉÆøïðUÀ½UÉ CºÀðvÉ PÀA ¸ÁzsÀ£É DzsÁjvÀ

DzÁAiÀÄ «ÄwAiÀÄAvÉ ¥Àæ¸ÀPÀÛ «Äw 2.50 ®PÀë

gÀÆ. 2.50 ®PÀë

II. gÁdå ªÀ®AiÀÄ AiÉÆÃd£ÉUÀ¼ÀÄ :

1. P˱À®å C©üªÀÈ¢Þ AiÉÆÃd£É gÀÆ. 2.50 ®PÀë gÀÆ. 2.00 ®PÀë

2. C®à¸ÀASÁåvÀgÀ «zÁåyðUÀ½UÉ GvÉÛÃd£À gÀÆ. 2.00 ®PÀë gÀÆ. 2.00 ®PÀë

3. «zÉñÀzÀ°è GvÀÛ£À ²PÀët ¥ÀqÉAiÀÄÄwÛgÀĪÀ «zÁåyðUÀ½UÉ «zÁåyðªÉÃvÀ£À

gÀÆ. 4.50 ®PÀë gÀÆ. 4.50 ®PÀë

4. ¸ÀàzsÁðvÀäPÀ ¥ÀjÃPÉëUÀ½UÉ vÀgÀ ÉÃw gÀÆ. 4.50 ®PÀë gÀÆ. 3.50 ®PÀë

5. ©zÁ¬Ä gÀÆ. 1.50 ®PÀë gÀÆ. 1.50 ®PÀë

6. C®à¸ÀASÁåvÀgÀ ªÀÄ»¼ÉAiÀÄjUÉ P˱À®å C©üªÀÈ¢Þ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ vÀgÀ ÉÃw

gÀÆ. 3.00 ®PÀë gÀÆ. 3.00 ®PÀë

III. f¯Áè ªÀ®AiÀÄ AiÉÆÃd£ÉUÀ¼ÀÄ :

1. ¸ÀPÁðj C®à¸ÀASÁåvÀgÀ J¯Áè «zÁåyð¤®AiÀÄUÀ¼À ¥ÀæªÉñÀ

gÀÆ. 1.00 ®PÀë gÀÆ. 44,500/-

2. ªÉÆgÁfð zÉøÁ¬Ä ªÀ Àw/ªÀÄĹèA ªÀ Àw ±Á ÉUÀ¼ÀÄ/PÁ¯ÉÃdÄUÀ¼ÀÄ

gÀÆ. 1.00 ®PÀë gÀÆ. 1.00 ®PÀë

3. C®à¸ÀASÁåvÀgÀ SÁ¸ÀV/C£ÀÄzÁ£À «zÁåyð¤®AiÀÄUÀ¼À ¥ÀæªÉñÀ

gÀÆ. 1.00 ®PÀë gÀÆ. 1.00 ®PÀë

4. C®à¸ÀASÁåvÀjUÁV C£ÁxÁ®AiÀÄUÀ¼À ¥ÀæªÉñÀPÁÌV

1. C£ÁxÀgÀÄ DzÁAiÀÄ «Äw E®è DzÁAiÀÄ «Äw E®è

2. ¤UÀðwPÀgÀÄ gÀÆ. 1.00 ®PÀë gÀÆ. 44,500-00 ®PÀë

Page 21: ¨ÁUÀ 1 - KarPage-81-124).pdf · 22/01/2015  · (e) Shri E. Rama Murthy had submitted a revised sketch on 31/5/2002 reducing the area to an extent of 380 acres. It was found that

sÁUÀ 1 PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ, d£ÀªÀj 22, 2015 101

PÀæªÀÄ ÀASÉå

AiÉÆÃd£ÉUÀ¼ÀÄ

¤UÀ¢¥Àr¹gÀĪÀ DzÁAiÀÄ «Äw

¥Àæ ÀªÀð-1gÀ°è §gÀĪÀ

(£ÀzÁ¥sï, ¦AeÁgÀ, zÀgÀªÉñï, ZÀ¥ÀàgÀ§Azï, PÀ¸Á§,

¥ÀƯïªÀiÁ°, (ªÀÄĹèA)

¥ÀæªÀUÀð-2J-¨sËzsÀÞ ÀªÀÄÄzÁAiÀÄ

¥ÀæªÀUÀð-2©- ªÀÄĹèA ÀªÀÄÄzÁAiÀÄ

¥ÀæªÀUÀð-3©- Qæ²ÑAiÀÄ£ï, eÉÊ£ï ÀªÀÄÄzÁAiÀÄ

¥Á¹ð, ¹Sï ÀªÀÄÄzÁAiÀÄ

5. PÁ£ÀÆ£ÀÄ ¥ÀzÀ«ÃzsÀgÀjUÉ ²µÀåªÉÃvÀ£À gÀÆ. 3.50 ®PÀë gÀÆ. 3.50 ®PÀë

6. LnL/r¥ÉÆèêÀÄ «zÁåyðUÀ½UÉ ²µÀåªÉÃvÀ£À gÀÆ. 1.00 ®PÀë gÀÆ. 1.00 ®PÀë

7. C®à¸ÀASÁåvÀjUÁV ªÀÈwÛ¥ÀgÀ vÀgÀ ÉÃw gÀÆ. 1.00 ®PÀë gÀÆ. 1.00 ®PÀë

PR. 884

SC. 500

JA. £ÁUÀgÀvÀß ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ G¥À PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð C®à¸ÀASÁåvÀgÀ PÀ Áåt E¯ÁSÉ

£ÀUÀgÁ©üªÀÈ¢Þ ÀaªÁ®AiÀÄ

«µÀAiÀÄ: ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ zÀQët vÁ®ÆèPÀÄ, GvÀÛgÀºÀ½î ºÉÆç½, vÀÄgÀºÀ½î UÁæªÀÄzÀ ¸ÀªÉð £ÀA. 50(¦) ºÁUÀÆ UÀħâ Á¼À UÁæªÀÄzÀ°è ¤«Äð¹zÀ ²æà DAd£ÉÃAiÀÄ ¸Áé«Ä UÀȺÀ ¤ªÀiÁðt ¸ÀºÀPÁgÀ ¸ÀAWÀzÀ SÁ¸ÀV §qÁªÀuÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ©©JA¦ UÉ ºÀ ÁÛAvÀj¸ÀĪÀ §UÉÎ.

NzÀ¯ÁVzÉ:

1. ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ C©üªÀÈ¢Þ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀzÀ ¥ÀvÀæ ¸ÀA. ¨ÉAC¥Áæ/DAiÀÄÄPÀÛgÀÄ/C¸À/CC-1/n-86/2014-15, ¢£ÁAPÀ 02-06-2014.

¥Àç¸ÁÛªÀ£É:

ªÉÄÃ É (1) gÀ°è NzÀ¯ÁVgÀĪÀ ¢£ÁAPÀ 02-06-2014 gÀ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀzÀ ¥Àæ¸ÁÛªÀ£ÉAiÀÄ°è ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ zÀQët vÁ®ÆèPÀÄ, GvÀÛgÀºÀ½î ºÉÆç½, vÀÄgÀºÀ½î UÁæªÀÄzÀ ¸ÀªÉð £ÀA. 50(¦) ºÁUÀÆ UÀħâ Á¼À UÁæªÀÄzÀ ¸ÀªÉð £ÀA. 52/1¦ gÀ°è MlÄÖ 5 JPÀgÉ 10 UÀÄAmÉ «¹ÛÃtðzÀ ¥ÀæzÉñÀzÀ°è ²æà DAd£ÉÃAiÀÄ ¸Áé«Ä UÀȺÀ ¤ªÀiÁðt ¸ÀºÀPÁgÀ ¸ÀAWÀzÀªÀgÀÄ SÁ¸ÀV §qÁªÀuÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß gÀa¹zÀÄÝ, ¸ÀzÀj §qÁªÀuÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀzÀ PÁAiÀiÁðzÉñÀ ¸ÀASÉå ÉAC¥Áæ/£ÀAiÉÆøÀ/¦J¯ï-45/2004/963/2010-11 ¢£ÁAPÀ 19-06-2010gÀ DzÉñÀzÀrAiÀÄ°è ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀ¢AzÀ C£ÀĪÉÆÃzÀ£ÉAiÀiÁVgÀÄvÀÛzÉ. F §qÁªÀuÉAiÀÄ°èAiÀÄ GzÁå£ÀªÀ£À ºÁUÀÆ gÀ ÉÛ ¥ÀæzÉñÀUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀPÉÌ ¥ÀjvÁåd£Á ¥ÀvÀæzÀ ªÀÄÆ®PÀ 12-04-2010 gÀAzÀÄ ºÀ ÁÛAvÀj¹gÀÄvÁÛgÉAzÀÄ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀzÀ DAiÀÄÄPÀÛgÀÄ vÀªÀÄä ªÀgÀ¢AiÀÄ°è w½¹gÀÄvÁÛgÉ.

¸ÀzÀj §qÁªÀuÉAiÀÄ J¯Áè ªÀÄÆ® ¸Ë® sÀå PÁªÀÄUÁjUÀ¼ÀÄ ¥ÀÆtðUÉÆArzÀÄÝ, §qÁªÀuÉAiÀÄ J¯Áè 89 ¤ªÉñÀ£ÀUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀ¢AzÀ ©qÀÄUÀqÉUÉƽ¸À ÁVgÀĪÀÅzÀjAzÀ ºÁUÀÆ ¸ÀzÀj §qÁªÀuÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ªÀÄÄA¢£À C©üªÀÈ¢ÞUÁV ºÁUÀÆ G¸ÀÄÛªÁjUÁV §ÈºÀvï ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ ªÀĺÁ£ÀUÀgÀ ¥Á°PÉUÉ ºÀ ÁÛAvÀj¸À®Ä DzÉñÀ ¤ÃqÀ ÉÃPÉAzÀÄ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀzÀ DAiÀÄÄPÀÛgÀÄ vÀªÀÄä ¥ÀvÀæzÀ°è PÉÆÃjgÀÄvÁÛgÉ.

CzÀgÀAvÉ ¸ÀPÁðgÀªÀÅ ¥Àæ¸ÁÛªÀ£ÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß PÀÆ®APÀµÀªÁV ¥Àj²Ã°¹ F PɼÀPÀAqÀAvÉ DzÉò¹zÉ.

¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ DzÉñÀ ¸ÀASÉå: £ÀCE 429 ÉA sÀƸÁé 2014, ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ, ¢£ÁAPÀ: 14-10-2014

¥Àæ¸ÁÛªÀ£ÉAiÀÄ°è «ªÀj¹gÀĪÀ CA±ÀUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¥Àj²Ã°¹ ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ zÀQët vÁ®ÆèPÀÄ, GvÀÛgÀºÀ½î ºÉÆç½, vÀÄgÀºÀ½î UÁæªÀÄzÀ ¸ÀªÉð £ÀA. 50(¦) ºÁUÀÆ UÀħâ Á¼À UÁæªÀÄzÀ ¸ÀªÉð £ÀA. 52/1¦ gÀ°è MlÄÖ 5 JPÀgÉ 10 UÀÄAmÉ «¹ÛÃtðzÀ ¥ÀæzÉñÀzÀ°è ²æà DAd£ÉÃAiÀÄ ¸Áé«Ä UÀȺÀ ¤ªÀiÁðt ¸ÀºÀPÁgÀ ¸ÀAWÀzÀªÀgÀÄ gÀa¹gÀĪÀ SÁ¸ÀV §qÁªÀuÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ C©üªÀÈ¢Þ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀzÀ PÁAiÉÄÝ 1976 PÀ®A 30 (1)gÀ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ªÀÄĤì¥À ï PÁ¥ÉÆÃðgÉõÀ£ï PÁAiÉÄÝ PÀ®A 4 gÀ£ÀéAiÀÄ ªÀÄÄA¢£À C©üªÀÈ¢Þ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ G¸ÀÄÛªÁjUÁV §ÈºÀvï ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ ªÀĺÁ£ÀUÀgÀ ¥Á°PÉUÉ F PÀÆqÀ Éà eÁjUÉ §gÀĪÀAvÉ ºÀ ÁÛAvÀj¸ÀĪÀAvÉ DzÉò¸À¯ÁVzÉ.

PR. 885

SC. 200

PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥Á®gÀ DeÁÕ£ÀĸÁgÀ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ CªÀgÀ ºÉ Àj£À°è J£ï. UÉÆÃ¥Á®AiÀÄå

¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ C¢üãÀ PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð (¥Àæ) £ÀUÀgÁ©üªÀÈ¢Þ E¯ÁSÉ

Page 22: ¨ÁUÀ 1 - KarPage-81-124).pdf · 22/01/2015  · (e) Shri E. Rama Murthy had submitted a revised sketch on 31/5/2002 reducing the area to an extent of 380 acres. It was found that

PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ, d£ÀªÀj 22, 2015 sÁUÀ 1 102

DyðPÀ ÀaªÁ®AiÀÄ wzÉÆÝà É

¸ÀASÉå: DE 67 DRE 2001 ( sÁ), ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ, ¢£ÁAPÀ: 13-11-2014

¸ÀPÁðj DzÉñÀ ¸ÀASÉå : DE 67 DRE 2001( sÁ) ¢£ÁAPÀ 19-09-2014 gÀ°è£À ¥Àæ¸ÁÛªÀ£É sÁUÀzÀ PÉÆ£ÉAiÀÄ PÀArPÉAiÀÄ°è £ÀªÀÄÆ¢vÀªÁVgÀĪÀ ``PÉ.n.¹.-64'' gÀ°è JA§ ¥ÀzÀªÀ£ÀÄß ``PÉ.n.¹.-66'' gÀ°è JAzÀÄ 19-09-2014 jAzÀ Éà eÁjUÉ §gÀĪÀAvÉ w¢Ý N¢PÉƼÀîvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ.

PR. 886

PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥Á®gÀ DeÁÕ£ÀĸÁgÀ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ CªÀgÀ ºÉ Àj£À°è J£ï. ®PÀëöät

¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ C¢üãÀ PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð DyðPÀ E¯ÁSÉ

(DqÀ½vÀ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ªÀÄÄAUÀqÀ)

M¼ÁqÀ½vÀ ÀaªÁ®AiÀÄ

«µÀAiÀÄ: ²æà PÉ. «±Àé£Áxï, ¦J¸ïL, r.J¸ï.J., J¥sï.¦.©., ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ UÁæªÀiÁAvÀgÀ f Éè EªÀgÀ ¥ÀjµÀÌgÀt ªÉÄîä£À«AiÀÄ §UÉÎ CAwªÀÄ DzÉñÀ.

NzÀ¯ÁVzÉ:

1. ²¸ÀÄÛ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀ ºÁUÀÆ DgÀPÀëPÀ ªÀĺÁ ¤jÃPÀëPÀgÀÄ, PÉÃAzÀæ ªÀ®AiÀÄ, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ EªÀgÀ DzÉñÀ ¸ÀASÉå : rE/57/²PÉë/2014 (N.©. ¸ÀASÉå : 190/2014) ¢£ÁAPÀ 11-02-2014.

2. ªÉÄîä£À« ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀ ºÁUÀÆ ªÀĺÁ ¤zÉÃð±ÀPÀgÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ DgÀPÀëPÀ ªÀĺÁ ¤jÃPÀëPÀgÀÄ, ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ EªÀgÀ DzÉñÀ ¸ÀASÉå : C¦Ã®Ä (4)/64/2013-14 (N.©. ¸ÀASÉå : 06/2014-15)

¢£ÁAPÀ 14-05-2014.

3. CfðzÁgÀgÀ ¥ÀjµÀÌgÀt ªÉÄîä£À« Cfð ¢£ÁAPÀ 17-05-2014.

4. ªÀĺÁ ¤zÉÃð±ÀPÀgÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ DgÀPÀëPÀ ªÀĺÁ ¤jÃPÀëPÀgÀÄ, ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ EªÀgÀ ¥ÀvÀæ ¸ÀASÉå : C¦Ã®Ä (2)11/2014-15, ¢£ÁAPÀ 02-06-2014.

5. PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ÉÆÃPÀ ÉêÁ DAiÉÆÃUÀzÀ ¥ÀvÀæ ¸ÀASÉå : ¦J¸ï¹ 132 ¹J£ïJ¸ï 2014, ¢£ÁAPÀ 03-11-2014.

¥Àç¸ÁÛªÀ£É:

²æà PÉ. «±Àé£Áxï, ¦J¸ïL, r.J¸ï.J., J¥sï.¦.©., ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ UÁæªÀiÁAvÀgÀ f Éè (E£ÀÄß ªÀÄÄAzÉ CfðzÁgÀgÉAzÀÄ PÀgÉAiÀÄ®àqÀĪÀ) EªÀgÀÄ F »AzÉ vÀ®WÀlÖ¥ÀÄgÀ ¥Éưøï oÁuÉ, gÁªÀÄ£ÀUÀgÀ f Éè E°è PÀvÀðªÀå ¤ªÀð»¸ÀÄwÛzÁÝUÀ, PÀvÀðªÀåzÀ°è CwêÀ ¤®ðPÀëöåvÉ ºÁUÀÆ ÉÃdªÁ¨ÁÝjvÀ£À ¥ÀæzÀ²ð¹zÀ PÁgÀtzÀ ªÉÄÃ É EªÀgÀ «gÀÄzÀÞ PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå ¥Éưøï (² ÀÄÛ £ÀqÀªÀ½) ¤AiÀĪÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ 1965/89gÀ ¤AiÀĪÀÄ

7gÀr F PɼÀPÀAqÀ zÉÆõÁgÉÆÃ¥ÀuÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ºÉÆj¸À ÁVzÉ.

zÉÆõÁgÉÆÃ¥ÀuÉ:

``¢£ÁAPÀ 02-02-2014 gÀAzÀÄ 16-30 UÀAmÉ ¸ÀªÀÄAiÀÄzÀ°è vÀ®WÀlÖ¥ÀÄgÀ ¥Éưøï oÁuÉ ¸ÀgÀºÀ¢Ý£À PÀUÀΰåÀÄgÀ UÁæªÀÄzÀ°è, GvÀÛgÀºÀ½î ºÉÆç½, N©ZÀÆqÀºÀ½î ¤ªÁ¹AiÀiÁzÀ ²æà ªÉÆúÀ£À JA¨ÁvÀ¤UÉ ¸ÀĤïï, PÉñÀªÀ, ªÀÄÆwð ªÀÄvÀÄÛ EvÀgÀgÀÄ ¸ÉÃj ºÀ¼É ªÉʵÀªÀÄå¢AzÀ ªÀiÁgÀPÁAiÀÄÄzsÀUÀ½AzÀ ºÀ Éè ªÀiÁr PÉÆ É ªÀiÁqÀ®Ä ¥ÀæAiÀÄwß¹zÀÄÝ, F §UÉÎ vÀ®WÀlÖ¥ÀÄgÀ ¥Éưøï oÁtÂAiÀÄ°è ªÉÆ.¸ÀA. 73/2014 PÀ®A 143, 147, 148, 324, 307, 435, 427, gÉ/« 149 L¦¹ jÃvÁå ¥ÀæPÀgÀt zÁR¯ÁVgÀÄvÀÛzÉ. DgÉÆævÀgÀÄ ºÁqÀĺÀUÀ Éà ¯ÁAUï ªÀÄZÀÄÑUÀ¼À£ÀÄß »rzÀÄPÉÆAqÀÄ ºÀ Éè ªÀiÁrzÀÝ£ÀÄß RAr¹ dAiÀÄ PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¸ÀAWÀ ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ £ÀUÀgÀ f¯ÁèzsÀåPÀëgÁzÀ ²æà Dgï. ZÀAzÀæ¥ÀàgÀªÀgÀ £ÉÃvÀÈvÀézÀ°è ¸ÀĪÀiÁgÀÄ 75 d£À

PÁAiÀÄðPÀvÀðgÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ, ¢£ÁAPÀ 03-02-2014 gÀAzÀÄ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtzÀ ¥ÀæªÀÄÄR DgÉÆævÀgÀ£ÀÄß 24 UÀAmÉAiÉƼÀUÁV zÀ ÀÛVj ªÀiÁqÀ ÉÃPÉAzÀÄ vÀ®WÀlÖ¥ÀÄgÀ ¥Éưøï oÁuÉ ªÀÄÄAzÉ zsÀgÀt £Àqɹ £ÀAvÀgÀ gÁ¶ÖçÃAiÀÄ ºÉzÁÝj gÀ ÉÛ vÀqÉzÀÄ ¥Àæw sÀl£É £ÀqɹgÀÄvÁÛgÉ.

¸ÀzÀj ªÉÄîÌAqÀ WÀl£ÉAiÀÄÄ ºÁqÀÄ ºÀUÀ Éà £ÀqÉ¢zÀÄÝ ¤ÃªÀÅ M§â dªÁ¨ÁÝjAiÀÄÄvÀ ¥Éưøï C¢üPÁjAiÀiÁVzÀÄÝ PÁ£ÀÆ£ÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ¸ÀĪÀåªÀ ÉÜ PÁ¥ÁqÀĪÀ°è ºÁUÀÆ ¸ÁªÀðd¤PÀjUÉ

Page 23: ¨ÁUÀ 1 - KarPage-81-124).pdf · 22/01/2015  · (e) Shri E. Rama Murthy had submitted a revised sketch on 31/5/2002 reducing the area to an extent of 380 acres. It was found that

sÁUÀ 1 PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ, d£ÀªÀj 22, 2015 103

gÀPÀëuÉ ¤ÃqÀĪÀ°è ¸ÀA¥ÀÆtð «¥sÀ®gÁVgÀĪÀÅzÀÄ PÀAqÀħA¢gÀĪÀ, ¸ÀzÀjAiÀĪÀgÀÄ AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉà gËrUÀ¼À ZÀlĪÀnPÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ºÀwÛPÀÄ̪À°è ªÀÄÄAeÁUÀævÉ PÀæªÀÄ ªÀ»¸ÀzÉ, WÀl£Á ¸ÀܼÀPÉÌ sÉÃn ¤ÃqÀzÉ vÀªÀÄä PÀvÀðªÀåzÀ°è CwêÀ ¤®ðPÀëöåvÉ vÉÆÃjgÀĪÀ ºÁUÀÆ F WÀl£É n« ªÀiÁzsÀåªÀÄUÀ¼À°è ¸ÀºÀ ¥Àæ¸ÁgÀªÁUÀ®Ä PÁgÀtgÁV, ¸ÁªÀðd¤PÀjUÉ ¥Éưøï E¯ÁSÉAiÀÄ §UÉÎ CUËgÀªÀ GAmÁUÀ®Ä PÁgÀtPÀvÀðgÁVgÀÄwÛÃj. F »£É߯ÉAiÀÄ°è ¥Éưøï C¢üÃPÀëPÀgÀÄ, gÁªÀÄ£ÀUÀgÀ f Éè gÀªÀgÀÄ ¸À°è À¯ÁzÀ ²¸ÀÄÛ PÀæªÀÄzÀ ªÀgÀ¢ ¸ÀASÉå : ¹§âA¢ (2) ²PÉë/4/2014, ¢£ÁAPÀ 03-02-2014 £ÀÄß PÀÆ®APÀµÀªÁV ¥Àj²Ã°¹zÉ.

vÀ®WÀlÖ¥ÀÄgÀ ¥Éưøï oÁuÉ PÀUÀΰåÀÄgÀ UÁæªÀÄzÀ°è, GvÀÛgÀºÀ½î ºÉÆç½, N©ZÀÆqÀºÀ½î ¤ªÁ¹AiÀiÁzÀ ²æà ªÉÆúÀ£ÀgÀªÀjUÉ ªÀiÁgÀuÁAwPÀ ºÀ ÉèAiÀiÁV CªÀgÀÄ ºÁ° ¸Á¬ÄgÁA D¸ÀàvÉæ ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆj£À°è aQvÉì ¥ÀqÉAiÀÄÄwÛzÀÄÝ, EAvÀºÀ UÀA©üÃgÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtzÀ°è EzÀĪÀgÉ«UÀÆ ¥ÀæªÀÄÄR DgÉÆæAiÀÄ£ÀÄß §A¢ü¸ÀĪÀ°è «¥sÀ®gÁVzÀÄÝ PÀvÀðªÀåzÀ°è CwêÀ ¤®ðPÀëöåvÉ, ÉÃdªÁÝjvÀ£À ¥ÀæzÀ²ð¹gÀĪÀ DgÉÆÃ¥À.

ªÉÄîÌAqÀ DgÉÆÃ¥ÀzÀ ªÉÄÃ É CfðzÁgÀgÀ ¸ÀªÀÄeÁ¬Ä¶ ¥ÀqÉzÀÄ, CzÀ£ÉÆߥÀàzÀ ²¸ÀÄÛ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀ ºÁUÀÆ DgÀPÀëPÀ ªÀĺÁ ¤jÃPÀëPÀgÀÄ, PÉÃAzÀæ ªÀ®AiÀÄ, ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ EªÀgÀÄ ªÉÄÃ É PÀæªÀÄ ¸ÀASÉå (1) gÀ°è NzÀ ÁzÀ ¢£ÁAPÀ 11-02-2014gÀ DzÉñÀzÀ°è EªÀjUÉ ªÁUÀÝAqÀ£É «¢ü¹, ¢£ÁAPÀ 04-02-2014 jAzÀ ¢£ÁAPÀ 11-02-2014 gÀªÀgÉV£À CªÀiÁ£ÀwÛ£À DzÉñÀªÀ£ÀÄß ``gÀeÁ CªÀ¢üAiÉÄAzÀÄ'' ¥ÀjUÀt¹ DzÉò¹gÀÄvÁÛgÉ.

²¸ÀÄÛ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀzÀ DzÉñÀzÀ «gÀÄzÀÞ ¸À°è¹zÀ ªÉÄîä£À«AiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¥Àj²Ã°¹zÀ ªÉÄîä£À« ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀ ºÁUÀÆ ªÀĺÁ ¤zÉÃð±ÀPÀgÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ DgÀPÀëPÀ ªÀĺÁ ¤jÃPÀëPÀgÀÄ, ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ EªÀgÀÄ ªÉÄÃ É PÀæªÀÄ ¸ÀASÉå : (2) gÀ°è NzÀ¯ÁzÀ ¢£ÁAPÀ 14-05-2014gÀ DzÉñÀzÀ°è ªÉÄîä£À«AiÀÄ£ÀÄß wgÀ ÀÌj¹gÀÄvÁÛgÉ.

F JgÀqÀÆ DzÉñÀUÀ¼À «gÀÄzÀÞ ²æà J¸ï.PÉ. ¸ÀÄgÉñï, ¹¦¹ gÀªÀgÀÄ ¸ÀPÁðgÀPÉÌ ¥ÀjµÀÌgÀt ªÉÄîä£À«AiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¸À°è¹gÀÄvÁÛgÉ. ¥ÀjµÀÌgÀt ªÉÄîä£À«AiÀÄ°è£À ªÁzÁA±ÀUÀ¼À£ÀÄß zÁR ÉUÀ¼ÉÆA¢UÉ ¥Àj²Ã°¸À¯ÁVzÉ. ¥Àæ¸ÀÄÛvÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtzÀ°è D.¥ÉÆ.C. gÀªÀgÀ ªÉÄÃ É ºÉÆgɹgÀĪÀ zÉÆõÁgÉÆÃ¥ÀuÉ ºÁUÀÆ ¸ÀzÀj C¢üPÁjAiÀÄ ¸ÀªÀÄeÁ¬Ä¶AiÀÄ£ÀÄß CªÀ ÉÆÃQ¸À ÁVzÀÄÝ, ¸ÀzÀjAiÀĪÀjUÉ «¢ü¹gÀĪÀ zÀAqÀ£ÉAiÀÄÄ DgÉÆÃ¥ÀPÉÌ vÀPÀÄÌzÀ®èªÁVgÀĪÀ »£Éß ÉAiÀÄ°è ¥ÀjµÀÌgÀt ªÉÄîä£À«AiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¥ÀÄgÀ ÀÌj¸ÀĪÀ PÀÄjvÀAvÉ NzÀ ÁzÀ (5)gÀ ¥ÀvÀæzÀ°è PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ÉÆÃPÀ ÉêÁ DAiÉÆÃUÀzÀ ¸ÀºÀªÀÄwAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¥ÀqÉzÀÄ ¸ÀPÁðgÀªÀÅ F PɼÀPÀAqÀAvÉ DzÉò¹zÉ.

¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ DzÉñÀ ¸ÀASÉå: ME 54 ¥ÉƹC 2014, ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ, ¢£ÁAPÀ: 13-11-2014

¥Àæ¸ÁÛªÀ£ÉAiÀÄ°è «ªÀj¹gÀĪÀ PÁgÀtUÀ¼À »£Éß ÉAiÀÄ°è, PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¥Éưøï C¢ü¤AiÀĪÀÄ 1963gÀ ¸ÉPÀë£ï 25 gÀrAiÀÄ°è ¸ÀPÁðgÀPÉÌ ¥ÀæzÀvÀÛªÁzÀ C¢üPÁgÀªÀ£ÀÄß ZÀ¯Á¬Ä¹, ²æà PÉ. «±Àé£Áxï, ¦J¸ïL, r.J¸ï.J., J¥sï.¦.©., ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ UÁæªÀiÁAvÀgÀ f Éè EªÀjUÉ ²¸ÀÄÛ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀzÀ «¢ü¹gÀĪÀ ``ªÁUÀÝAqÀ£É'' DzÉñÀªÀ£ÀÄß gÀzÀÄÝ¥Àr¹, ¸ÀzÀjAiÀĪÀgÀÄ ¢£ÁAPÀ 04-02-2014 jAzÀ ¢£ÁAPÀ 11-02-2014 gÀªÀgÉUÉ CªÀiÁ£ÀwÛ£À°è PÀ¼ÉzÀ CªÀ¢üAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ``¸ÀA§¼À ¸À»vÀ gÀeÉ CªÀ¢ü'' JAzÀÄ ¥ÀjUÀt¹ DzÉò¹zÉ.

PR. 887

PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥Á®gÀ DeÁÕ£ÀĸÁgÀ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ CªÀgÀ ºÉ Àj£À°è eÉ.r. ªÀÄzsÀÄZÀAzÀæ vÉÃd¹é

¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ C¢üãÀ PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð M¼ÁqÀ½vÀ E¯ÁSÉ

(¥ÉÆ°Ã¸ï ¸ÉêÉUÀ¼ÀÄ)

FOREST, ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENT SECRETARIAT

Subject : Diversion of 0.6096 ha. of forest land - in -Sy. No. 306, 308, 311, 318, 317, 319, 316 & 408

for construction of rising main and intermediate sump for drinking water supply project to

Bhendwad - and 9 other villages in Raibag -Taluk, - Belgaum District in favour of the

Executive Engineer, Panchayath Raj Engineering Division, Chikkodi-regarding.

READ :

1) Letter No.A5-(2) GFL.CR.18/2013-14, dated:-11/15-09-2014 of Principal Chief

Conservator -of Forests (Head of Forest - Force), Bengaluru.

2) Government of India letter-No.F.No.11-9/98-FC, dated: 21-11-2005, 26/27-12-2007,

08-04-2009 and 13-02-2014.

PREAMBLE:

The Principal Chief Conservator of Forests, Bengaluru vide letter dated 11/15.09.2014 read at (1) above has submitted the

proposal for diversion of 0.6096 ha. of forest land in Sy. No. 306, 308, 311, 318, 317, 319, 316 & 408 for construction of rising main and

Page 24: ¨ÁUÀ 1 - KarPage-81-124).pdf · 22/01/2015  · (e) Shri E. Rama Murthy had submitted a revised sketch on 31/5/2002 reducing the area to an extent of 380 acres. It was found that

PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ, d£ÀªÀj 22, 2015 sÁUÀ 1 104 intermediate sump for drinking water supply project to Bhendwad and 9 other villages - in Raibag Taluk, Belgaum District in favour of the

Executive Engineer, Panchayath Raj Engineering Division, Chikkodi subject to certain conditions.

This proposal has. been examined as per the general approval of Government of India, vide its guidelines dated: -

21.11.2005, 26/27-12-2007, 08-04-2009 and 13-02-2014 and it has been decided to accord sanction for diversion of 0.6096 ha. of

forest land under the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 and hence the order.

GOVERNMENT ORDER NO. FEE 124 FLL 2014, BENGALURU, DATED:19/11/2014.

In the circumstances explained in the preamble above and in accordance with the general approval given by Government of

India in their guidelines dated: 21-11-2005, 26/27-12-2007, 08-04-2009 and 13-02-2014 Government are pleased to accord approval

under Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 for diversion of 0.6096 ha. of forest land in Sy. No. 306, 308, 311, 318, 317, 319, 316 & 408

for construction of rising main and intermediate sump for drinking water supply project to Bhendwad and 9 other villages in Raibag

Taluk, Belgaum District in favour of the Executive Engineer, Panchayath Raj Engineering Division, Chikkodi subiect to the following

conditions. --

The details of the forest land are as under:-

Sl.No. Village & Survey No. Purpose Length X

Breadth (Mts) Extent (In ha.)

1 Raibag

Sy. No. 306, 308, 311, 318,317,

319, 316 & 408

Construction of Intermediate

Sump

40.00 X 30.00 0.1200

2 Construction of rising main 2448.00 X 2.00 0.4896

Total 0.6096

1. The legal status of the forest land shall remain unchanged and it shall continue to be as forest land.

2. The lessee shall pay lease rent as fixed by the Government from time to time.

3. The lease tenure is 20 (twenty) years.

4. The leased out area should be used for the purpose for which it is granted. In case the land is not used for the

stipulated purpose within one year or when it is no longer needed for the stipulated purpose, the area shall be

resumed back. The concerned Chief Conservator of Forests/Deputy Conservator of Forests is authorized to take

necessary action in this regard.

5. In case of any violations /stipulations agreed conditions reported during the Iease period, the lease shall be liable

for forfeiture under section 82 of Karnataka Forest Act, 1963. The concerned Chief Conservator of Forests is

authorized to take necessary action in this regard.

6. No residential building shall be permitted in the proposed forest area.

7. The leased out area shall be demarcated on ground by fixing RCC pillars ar an interval of 20.00 Mtrs and the

boundary shall be fenced with chain link mesh at the cost of the User Agency.

8. The Karnataka Forest Act 1963 and Rules 1969 and other relevant Acts and Rules will be applicable for any

violation .

9. The User Agency has to pay the Net Present Value (NPV) of forest land diverted under this proposal as

per conditions stipulated by Government of India, Ministry of Environment and Forests, New Delhi vide letter-

No.111- 9/98-FC, dated: 13-02-2014 and orders dated 28/03/2008 and 09/05/2008 of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of

India.

10. The User Agency shall ensure that there should be no damage to the available fauna and flora.

11. No labour camp shall be established on the forest lands.

12. Any damage to forest area due to such works shall be compensated by the User Agency. The extent of damage

shall be assessed by the concerned Deputy Conservator of Forests.

13. The User Agency shall not sub-lease, mortgage or hypothecate the forest area.

14. The User Agency shall abide by all the conditions imposed upon by the Government of India, the Government of

Karnataka and the Principal Chief Conservator of Forests (Head of Forest Force).

PR. 888

SC. 100

By Order and in the name of the Governor of Karnataka

L. SHARADA

Under Secretary to Government

Forest, Ecology and Environment Department.

Page 25: ¨ÁUÀ 1 - KarPage-81-124).pdf · 22/01/2015  · (e) Shri E. Rama Murthy had submitted a revised sketch on 31/5/2002 reducing the area to an extent of 380 acres. It was found that

sÁUÀ 1 PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ, d£ÀªÀj 22, 2015 105

PÀAzÁAiÀÄ ÀaªÁ®AiÀÄ

«µÀAiÀÄ: ªÀÄAqÀå vÁ®ÆèPÀÄ, PÉgÀUÉÆÃqÀÄ ºÉÆç½, ©. ºÉƸÀÆgÀÄ UÁæªÀÄzÀ ¸À.£ÀA. 48 gÀ°è 5.30 JPÀgÉ ºÁUÀÆ fÃUÀÄAr¥ÀlÖt UÁæªÀÄzÀ ¸À.£ÀA. 9 gÀ°è 4.10 JPÀgÉ MlÄÖ 10.00 JPÀgÉ d«ÄãÀ£ÀÄß PÉÃA¢æÃAiÀÄ «zÁå®AiÀÄ ¤ªÀiÁðtPÉÌ ªÀÄAdÆgÀÄ ªÀiÁqÀĪÀ §UÉÎ.

NzÀ¯ÁVzÉ:

f¯Áè¢üPÁj, ªÀÄAqÀå f Éè, ªÀÄAqÀå EªÀgÀ ¥ÀvÀæ ¸ÀA. J¯ïJ£ïr (1) 228/2010-11, ¢£ÁAPÀ 25.07.2014.

¥Àç¸ÁÛªÀ£É:

f¯Áè¢üPÁjUÀ¼ÀÄ, ªÀÄAqÀå f Éè, ªÀÄAqÀå EªÀgÀÄ ªÀÄAqÀå f Éè/vÁ®ÆèPÀÄ, PÉgÉUÉÆÃqÀÄ ºÉÆç½AiÀÄ ©. ºÉƸÀÆgÀÄ UÁæªÀÄzÀ ¸À.£ÀA. 48gÀ°è 5.30 JPÀgÉ ºÁUÀÆ fÃUÀÄAr¥ÀlÖt UÁæªÀÄzÀ ¸À.£ÀA. 9 gÀ°è 4.10 JPÀgÉ MlÄÖ 10.00 JPÀgÉ d«ÄãÀ£ÀÄß PÉÃA¢æÃAiÀÄ «zÁå®AiÀÄ ¤ªÀiÁðtPÉÌ ªÀÄAdÆgÀÄ ªÀiÁqÀĪÀAvÉ PÉÆÃjgÀÄvÁÛgÉ.

2. ¸ÀzÀj d«Ää£À Dgï.n.¹. AiÀÄ°è UÉÆêÀiÁ¼À JA§ÄzÁV £ÀªÀÄÆzÀÄ EzÀÄÝ, ¥Àæ¸ÀÄÛvÀ UÉÆêÀiÁ¼À ¸ÀégÀÆ¥ÀªÀ£ÀÄß PÀ¼ÉzÀÄPÉÆArgÀÄvÀÛzÉ. F §UÉÎ £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄzÀ°è AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉà £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄ ¥ÀæPÀgÀt zÁR¯ÁVgÀĪÀÅ¢®è. ¥Àæ¸ÁÛ¦vÀ d«Ää£À°è ªÀĺÁvÀä UÁA¢ü PÀëAiÀÄ gÉÆÃUÀ D¸ÀàvÉæ¬ÄzÀÄÝ, PÀlÖqÀ ¸ÀºÁ EgÀÄvÀÛzÉ. EzÀÄ DgÉÆÃUÀå ªÀÄvÀÄÛ PÀÄlÄA§ PÀ Áåt E¯ÁSÉAiÀÄ C¢üãÀPÉÌ M¼À¥ÀnÖzÀÄÝ, ¸ÀzÀj E¯ÁSÉAiÀÄ C©ü¥ÁæAiÀĪÀ£ÀÄß ¥ÀqÉAiÀįÁVzÀÄÝ, DgÉÆÃUÀå ªÀÄvÀÄÛ PÀÄlÄA§ PÀ Áåt E¯ÁSÉAiÀÄ C©ü¥ÁæAiÀÄzÀAvÉ D¸ÀàvÉæAiÀÄ PÀlÖqÀUÀ½UÉ ¸ÀA¥ÀQð¸À®Ä 60 Cr gÀ ÉÛUÉ eÁUÀªÀ£ÀÄß ©lÄÖPÉÆqÀ®Ä µÀgÀvÀÄÛ «¢ü¹ ªÀÄAdÆgÀÄ ªÀiÁqÀ§ºÀÄzÁV C©ü¥ÁæAiÀÄ/¸ÀºÀªÀÄw ¤ÃrgÀÄvÀÛzÉ.

ªÉÄîÌAqÀ ¥Àæ¸ÁÛªÀ£ÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß PÀÆ®APÀµÀªÁV ¥Àj²Ã°¹ F PɼÀPÀAqÀAvÉ DzÉò¹zÉ.

¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ DzÉñÀ ¸ÀASÉå: Dgïr 59 J¯ïfªÉÊ 2014, ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ, ¢£ÁAPÀ: 26-11-2014

¥Àæ¸ÁÛªÀ£ÉAiÀÄ°è «ªÀj¹gÀĪÀ CA±ÀUÀ¼À »£Éß ÉAiÀÄ°è ¥Àæ¸ÁÛ¦vÀ d«Ää£À°è ªÀĺÁvÀä UÁA¢ü PÀëAiÀÄ gÉÆÃUÀ D¸ÀàvÉæ¬ÄzÀÄÝ, ¸ÀzÀj D¸ÀàvÉæUÉ ¸ÀA¥ÀQð¸À®Ä 60 Cr gÀ ÉÛUÉ eÁUÀªÀ£ÀÄß ©lÄÖPÉÆqÀĪÀ µÀgÀwÛUÉƼÀ¥ÀlÄÖ ªÀÄAqÀå vÁ®ÆèPÀÄ, PÉgÀUÉÆÃqÀÄ ºÉÆç½, ©. ºÉƸÀÆgÀÄ UÁæªÀÄzÀ ¸À.£ÀA. 48 gÀ°è 5.30 JPÀgÉ ºÁUÀÆ fÃUÀÄAr¥ÀlÖt UÁæªÀÄzÀ ¸À.£ÀA. 9 gÀ°è 4.10 JPÀgÉ MlÄÖ 10.00 JPÀgÉ d«ÄãÀ£ÀÄß PÉÃA¢æÃAiÀÄ «zÁå®AiÀÄ ¤ªÀiÁðtPÉÌ ªÀUÁðªÀuÉ ªÀiÁqÀ®Ä C£ÀĪÉÆÃzÀ£É ¤ÃqÀ ÁVzÉ.

1) ªÀÄAdÆgÁzÀ sÀÆ«ÄAiÀÄ£ÀÄß AiÀiÁªÀ GzÉÝñÀPÉÌ ªÀÄAdÆgÀÄ ªÀiÁqÀ ÁVzÉAiÉÆà CzÉà GzÉÝñÀPÉÌ JgÀqÀÄ ªÀµÀðUÀ¼À CªÀ¢üAiÉƼÀUÉ G¥ÀAiÉÆÃV¸ÀvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ.

2) ªÀÄAdÆgÁzÀ sÀÆ«ÄAiÀÄ£ÀÄß «£Á±ÀPÁjAiÀiÁzÀ CxÀªÁ SÁAiÀÄA DV ºÁ¤PÁgÀPÀªÁUÀĪÀ jÃwAiÀÄ°è §¼À ÀvÀPÀÌzÀÝ®è.

3) ªÀÄAdÆgÁzÀ d«Ää£À°è AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉà jÃwAiÀÄ CwPÀæªÀÄtªÁUÀzÀAvÉ PÀæªÀĪÀ»¸ÀvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ.

4) ªÀÄAdÆgÀÄ ªÀiÁqÀ®àqÀĪÀ d«Ää£À ªÉÄÃ É AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉà £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄzÀ°è zÁªÉUÀ¼ÀÄ zÁR¯ÁVzÀÝ°è, F ªÀÄAdÆgÁwAiÀÄÄ £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄzÀ CAwªÀÄ DzÉñÀPÉÌ M¼À¥ÀnÖgÀÄvÀÛzÉ.

5) ªÀÄAdÆgÁzÀ d«ÄãÀ£ÀÄß PÀAzÁAiÀÄ E¯ÁSÉAiÀÄ C£ÀĪÀÄw E®èzÉ ªÀiÁgÁl ªÀiÁqÀĪÀÅzÁUÀ°Ã, UÀÄwÛUÉ/G¥ÀUÀÄwÛUÉ ¤ÃqÀĪÀÅzÁUÀ°Ã, CqÀªÀiÁ£À, ªÀUÁðªÀuÉ, zÁ£À, EvÀgÉ AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉà jÃwAiÀÄ ¥ÀgÀ sÁgÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ªÀiÁqÀ¨ÁgÀzÀÄ.

6) ªÀÄAdÆgÁzÀ d«Ää£À AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉà sÁUÀªÀÅ ¸ÁªÀðd¤PÀ GzÉÝñÀPÉÌ CUÀvÀåªÁVzÀÝ°è ¸ÀPÁðgÀªÀÅ ¸ÀzÀj d«ÄãÀ£ÀÄß ¥ÀjºÁgÀ ¤ÃqÀzÉà »AvÉUÉzÀÄPÉƼÀÄîªÀ ºÀPÀÌ£ÀÄß ºÉÆA¢gÀÄvÀÛzÉ.

7) ªÀÄAdÆgÁzÀ d«ÄãÀÄ ¸ÀA¸ÉÜUÉ CªÀ±Àå«®èªÉAzÀÄ PÀAqÀħAzÀ°è PÀAzÁAiÀÄ E¯ÁSÉUÉ »AwgÀÄV¸ÀvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ.

8) ªÀÄAdÆgÁzÀ d«ÄãÀÄ 1969gÀ PÀ£ÁðlPÀ sÀÆ ªÀÄAdÆgÁw ¤AiÀĪÀÄUÀ½UÉ §zÀݪÁVzÀÄÝ, ¸ÀzÀj ¤AiÀĪÀÄUÀ¼À G®èAWÀ£ÉAiÀiÁzÀ°è F ªÀÄAdÆgÁw DzÉñÀ vÀ£ÀßµÀÖPÉÌ vÁ£Éà gÀzÁÝUÀĪÀÅzÀÄ ºÁUÀÆ AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉà ¥ÀjºÁgÀ ¤ÃqÀzÉà ªÀÄAdÆgÁzÀ d«ÄãÀ£ÀÄß ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ ªÀ±ÀPÉÌ ¥ÀqÉAiÀįÁUÀĪÀÅzÀÄ.

9) f¯Áè¢üPÁjUÀ¼ÀÄ ªÀÄAdÆgÁzÀ d«ÄãÀ£ÀÄß ¥sÀ Á£ÀÄ sÀ«UÀ½UÉ ºÀ ÁÛAvÀj¸ÀĪÁUÀ ªÀÄAdÆgÁzÀ ¥ÀæzÉñÀzÀ ªÁ¸ÀÛªÀ ¥Àj¹ÜwUÀ¼À£ÀÄß UÀªÀÄ£ÀzÀ°èlÄÖPÉÆAqÀÄ ¥ÀÆgÀPÀªÁzÀ µÀgÀvÀÄÛUÀ¼À£ÀÄß «¢ü¸À§ºÀÄzÁVzÉ.

PR. 889

SC. 25

PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥Á®gÀ DeÁÕ£ÀĸÁgÀ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ CªÀgÀ ºÉ Àj£À°è GzÀAiÀÄ Dgï. £ÁAiÀÄPï

¦ÃoÁ¢üPÁj PÀAzÁAiÀÄ E¯ÁSÉ ( sÀÆ.ªÀÄA-2)

Page 26: ¨ÁUÀ 1 - KarPage-81-124).pdf · 22/01/2015  · (e) Shri E. Rama Murthy had submitted a revised sketch on 31/5/2002 reducing the area to an extent of 380 acres. It was found that

PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ, d£ÀªÀj 22, 2015 sÁUÀ 1 106

PÁ£ÀÆ£ÀÄ ÀaªÁ®AiÀÄ

«µÀAiÀÄ : ©eÁ¥ÀÄgÀ f Éè EAr PÀAzÁAiÀÄ vÁ®ÆèQ£À°è ºÉƸÀzÁV ¸ÀÈf¹gÀĪÀ MAzÀÄ £ÉÆÃlj ºÀÄzÉÝAiÀÄ£ÀÄß vÀÄA§ÄªÀ §UÉÎ.

NzÀ¯ÁVzÉ : 1. ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ DzÉñÀ ¸ÀASÉå : ¯Á 121 J¯ï¹J¯ï 2012, ¢£ÁAPÀ : 21-10-2013.

2. ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ ¥ÀvÀæ ¸ÀASÉå : ¯Á 13 J¯ï¹J¯ï 2014, ¢£ÁAPÀ : 13-02-2014.

3. ¥ÀæzsÁ£À f¯Áè ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ¸ÀvÀæ £ÁåAiÀiÁ¢üñÀgÀÄ, ©eÁ¥ÀÄgÀ f Éè, ¢£ÁAPÀ : 30-05-2014.

4. £ÉÆÃljUÀ¼À wzÀÄÝ¥Àr ¤AiÀĪÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ 2009gÀ C¢ü¸ÀÆZÀ£É ¸ÀASÉå : fJ¸ïDgï 114(J), ¢£ÁAPÀ : 24-02-2009.

5. ¸ÀAzÀ±Àð£À ªÀÄAqÀ½ gÀZÀ£É C¢ü¸ÀÆZÀ£É ¸ÀASÉå : ¯Á 61 J¯ï¹J¯ï 2009, ¢£ÁAPÀ : 24-07-2010 ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ¯Á 53 J¯ï¹J¯ï 2013, ¢£ÁAPÀ : 23-07-2013.

6. ¸ÀAzÀ±Àð£À ¸ÀÆZÀ£Á ¥ÀvÀæ ¸ÀASÉå : ¯Á 13 J¯ï¹J¯ï 2014, ¢£ÁAPÀ : 25-08-2014.

¥Àæ¸ÁÛªÀ£É :

ªÉÄÃ É (1)gÀ NzÀ ÁzÀ ¢£ÁAPÀ : 21-10-2013gÀ ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ DzÉñÀzÀ°è ©eÁ¥ÀÄgÀ f ÉèAiÀÄ EAr PÀAzÁAiÀÄ vÁ®ÆèQUÉ MAzÀÄ ºÉZÀÄѪÀj £ÉÆÃlj ºÀÄzÉÝAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¸ÀÈf¹zÀÄÝ, ¸ÀzÀj ºÀÄzÉÝAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¨sÀwð ªÀiÁqÀ®Ä ¸ÀܽÃAiÀÄjAzÀ CfðUÀ¼À£ÀÄß DºÁ餹 £ÉÆÃljUÀ¼À C¢ü¤AiÀĪÀÄ / ¤AiÀĪÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ ºÁUÀÆ PÁ£ÀÆ£ÀÄ C¢üPÁjUÀ¼À (£ÉêÀÄPÁw ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ¸ÉêÁ µÀgÀvÀÄÛ) ¤AiÀĪÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ 1977gÀ ¤AiÀĪÀÄ 12 gÀrAiÀÄ°è ¥Àj²Ã°¹ ¸ÀÆPÀÛ ¥Àæ¸ÁÛªÀ£ÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß PÀ¼ÀÄ»¹PÉÆqÀĪÀAvÉ ¥ÀæzsÁ£À f¯Áè ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ¸ÀvÀæ £ÁåAiÀiÁ¢üñÀgÀÄ, ©eÁ¥ÀÄgÀ f Éè EªÀgÀ£ÀÄß ¢£ÁAPÀ : 13-02-2014 gÀAzÀÄ PÉÆÃgÀ ÁVvÀÄÛ.

CzÀgÀAvÉ, ¥ÀæzsÁ£À f¯Áè ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ¸ÀvÀæ £ÁåAiÀiÁ¢üñÀPÀgÀÄ, ©eÁ¥ÀÄgÀ f Éè EªÀgÀÄ ªÉÄÃ É NzÀ¯ÁzÀ (3)gÀ°è ¢£ÁAPÀ : 30-05-2014gÀ°è 14 d£ÀgÀ ªÉĪÉÆÃjAiÀįïìUÀ¼À£ÉÆß¼ÀUÉÆAqÀ ¥Àæ¸ÁÛªÀ£ÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¸À°è¹zÀÝgÀÄ. D ¥Àæ¸ÁÛªÀ£ÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ªÉÄÃ É NzÀ ÁzÀ (4)gÀ°è £ÉÆÃljUÀ¼À wzÀÄÝ¥Àr ¤AiÀĪÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ 2009gÀ£ÀéAiÀÄ PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¢AzÀ £ÉÆÃljUÀ¼À £ÉêÀÄPÀPÁÌV ªÉÄÃ É NzÀ¯ÁzÀ (5)gÀ C¢ü¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À°è gÀa¸À ÁVgÀĪÀ ¸ÀAzÀ±Àð£À ªÀÄAqÀ½AiÀÄ ¥Àj²Ã®£ÉUÉ PÀ¼ÀÄ»¹ J¯Áè C sÀåyðUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¸ÀAzÀ±Àð£À ªÀÄAqÀ½AiÀÄ ªÀÄÄAzÉ ¸ÀAzÀ±Àð£ÀPÉÌ ºÁdgÁUÀĪÀAvÉ ªÉÄÃ É NzÀ ÁzÀ (6)gÀ ¢£ÁAPÀ : 25-08-2014gÀ°è ¸ÀAzÀ±Àð£À ¸ÀÆZÀ£Á ¥ÀvÀæzÀ°è ¸ÀÆa¸À ÁVvÀÄÛ. CzÀgÀAvÉ, ¸ÀAzÀ±Àð£À ªÀÄAqÀ½AiÀÄÄ ¸ÀAzÀ±Àð£À £Àqɹ ªÀgÀ¢ ¸À°è¹zÉ.

¸ÀAzÀ±Àð£À ªÀÄAqÀ½AiÀÄ ²¥sÁgÀ Àì£ÀÄß ¸ÀPÁðgÀªÀÅ ¥ÀjUÀt¹zÉ. CzÀgÀAvÉ F DzÉñÀ.

ÀPÁðgÀzÀ DzÉñÀ ÀASÉå : ¯Á 13 J¯ï¹J¯ï 2014, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ, ¢£ÁAPÀ : 30-10-2014.

£ÉÆÃljUÀ¼À C¢ü¤AiÀĪÀÄ, 1952 ºÁUÀÆ EzÀgÀ CrAiÀÄ°è gÀa¸À ÁVgÀĪÀ £ÉÆÃljUÀ¼À ¤AiÀĪÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ, 1956 ºÁUÀÆ £ÀAvÀgÀzÀ wzÀÄÝ¥Àr ¤AiÀĪÀÄUÀ¼À£ÀéAiÀÄ ¥Àj²Ã°¹, ¤AiÀĪÀÄ 8(1)gÀ°è ¥ÀæzÀvÀÛªÁVgÀĪÀ C¢üPÁgÀzÀ£ÀéAiÀÄ ²æà ¹zÁæªÀÄ ±ÀgÀt¥Àà ¥ÀÆeÁj, ªÀQîgÀÄ, ¸À£ï D¥sï ²æà ±ÀgÀt¥Àà ¥ÀÆeÁj, §ºÁgï ¥ÉÃmÉ UÀ°è, EAr-586209, ©eÁ¥ÀÄgÀ f Éè EªÀgÀ£ÀÄß ªÀÈwÛ ¥ÀæªÀiÁt ¥ÀvÀæ ¤ÃqÀ ÁzÀ ¢£ÁAPÀ¢AzÀ LzÀÄ ªÀµÀðUÀ¼À CªÀ¢üUÉ ©eÁ¥ÀÄgÀ f ÉèAiÀÄ EAr PÀAzÁAiÀÄ vÁ®ÆèQ£À £ÉÆÃljAiÀÄ£ÁßV £ÉëĹzÉ.

¸ÀzÀj ªÀQîgÀÄ ÉPÀÌ ²Ã¶ðPÉ 0070-EvÀgÉ DqÀ½vÁvÀäPÀ ¸ÉêÉUÀ¼ÀÄ-01-£ÁåAiÀÄ ¥Àj¥Á®£É-501-0-EvÀgÉ ¹éÃPÀÈwUÀ¼ÀÄ-06 EvÀgÉ ¨Á§ÄÛUÀ½UÉ (0070-01-501-0-06) £ÉÆÃlj ¤AiÀĪÀÄUÀ¼À°è ¤UÀ¢ü¥Àr¸À ÁzÀ gÀÆ. 1000-00 (MAzÀÄ ¸Á«gÀUÀ¼ÀÄ ªÀiÁvÀæ) ±ÀĮ̪À£ÀÄß ¸ÀPÁðj ReÁ£ÉAiÀÄ°è dªÀiÁ ªÀiÁr D §UÉV£À ªÀÄÆ® ZÀ®£ï ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ºÀÄnÖzÀ ¢£ÁAPÀªÀ£ÀÄß zÀÈrüÃPÀj¸À§®è zÁR ÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ºÁdgÀÄ¥Àr¹zÀ £ÀAvÀgÀ CªÀjUÉ ªÀÈwÛ ¥ÀæªÀiÁt ¥ÀvÀæ ¤ÃqÀ ÁUÀĪÀÅzÀÄ.

ªÀÈwÛ ¥ÀæªÀiÁt ¥ÀvÀæ ¤ÃrzÀ £ÀAvÀgÀ ²æÃAiÀÄÄvÀgÀ ºÉ ÀgÀ£ÀÄß £ÉÆÃlj C¢ü¤AiÀĪÀÄ, 1952gÀ PÀ®A 4£Éà ¥ÀæPÀgÀtzÀr ¸ÀPÁðgÀ ¤ªÀð»¸ÀÄwÛgÀĪÀ ¥ÀnÖAiÀÄ°è £ÀªÀÄÆ¢¸À ÁUÀĪÀÅzÀÄ.

P.R. 817

SC-25

PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥Á®gÀ DzÉñÁ£ÀĸÁgÀ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ CªÀgÀ ºÉ Àj£À°è

eÉ. ®PÀëöät

¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ C¢üãÀ PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð (¥Àæ sÁgÀ),

PÁ£ÀÆ£ÀÄ E¯ÁSÉ (DqÀ½vÀ-2).

PÁ£ÀÆ£ÀÄ ÀaªÁ®AiÀÄ

«µÀAiÀÄ : ©Ã¼ÀV PÀAzÁAiÀÄ vÁ®ÆèPÀÄ, ¨ÁUÀ®PÉÆÃmÉ f Éè E°èUÉ MAzÀÄ ºÉZÀÄѪÀj £ÉÆÃlj ºÀÄzÉÝAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¸ÀÈf¸ÀĪÀ §UÉÎ.

NzÀ¯ÁVzÉ : 1. ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ DzÉñÀ ¸ÀASÉå : ¯Á 142 J¯ï¹J¯ï 2013, ¢£ÁAPÀ : 26-08-2013.

2. f¯Áè¢üPÁjUÀ¼À PÁAiÀiÁð®AiÀÄ, ¨ÁUÀ®PÉÆÃmÉ f ÉègÀªÀgÀ ¥ÀvÀæ ¢£ÁAPÀ : 06-02-2014.

3. ¥ÀæzsÁ£À f¯Áè ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ¸ÀvÀæ £ÁåAiÀiÁ¢üñÀgÀÄ, ¨ÁUÀ®PÉÆÃmÉ f ÉègÀªÀgÀ ¥ÀvÀæ ¢£ÁAPÀ : 25-09-2014.

Page 27: ¨ÁUÀ 1 - KarPage-81-124).pdf · 22/01/2015  · (e) Shri E. Rama Murthy had submitted a revised sketch on 31/5/2002 reducing the area to an extent of 380 acres. It was found that

sÁUÀ 1 PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ, d£ÀªÀj 22, 2015 107

¥Àæ¸ÁÛªÀ£É :

ªÉÄÃ É NzÀ¯ÁzÀ (1)gÀ ¢£ÁAPÀ : 26-08-2013gÀ ¥ÀvÀæzÀ°è ¨ÁUÀ®PÉÆÃmÉ f ÉèAiÀÄ ©Ã¼ÀV PÀAzÁAiÀÄ vÁ®ÆèQUÉ ºÁ° EgÀĪÀ 03 £ÉÆÃljUÀ½UÉ ºÉaÑ£À PÉ®¸ÀzÀ MvÀÛqÀ«gÀĪÀ §UÉÎ ºÁUÀÆ E£ÀÆß ºÉZÀÄѪÀj ºÀÄzÉÝUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¸ÀÈf¸ÀĪÀ CªÀ±ÀåPÀvÉ EzÉAiÉÄà JA§ §UÉÎ ¸ÀªÀÄxÀð¤ÃAiÀÄ «ªÀgÀuÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß MzÀV¸ÀĪÀAvÉ ¥ÀæzsÁ£À f¯Áè ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ¸ÀvÀæ £ÁåAiÀiÁ¢üñÀgÀÄ, ¨ÁUÀ®PÉÆÃmÉ f Éè ªÀÄvÀÄÛ f¯Áè¢üPÁjUÀ¼ÀÄ, ¨ÁUÀ®PÉÆÃmÉ f Éè EªÀgÀÄUÀ¼À£ÀÄß PÉÆÃgÀ ÁVvÀÄÛ.

f¯Áè¢üPÁjUÀ¼ÀÄ, ¨ÁUÀ®PÉÆÃmÉ f Éè EªÀgÀÄ ªÉÄÃ É NzÀ ÁzÀ (2)gÀ ¢£ÁAPÀ : 06-02-2014gÀ ¥Àæ¸ÁÛªÀ£ÉAiÉÆA¢UÉ, vÀºÀ²Ã¯ÁÝgÀgÀÄ, ©Ã¼ÀV EªÀjAzÀ ¥ÀqÉzÀ ªÀgÀ¢AiÀÄ£ÀÄß ®UÀwÛ¹, ¸ÀzÀj ªÀgÀ¢AiÀÄ°èAiÀÄAvÉ ©Ã¼ÀV vÁ®ÆèQ£À°è PÉÃAzÀæ ¸ÀPÁðgÀ¢AzÀ AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉà £ÉÆÃljUÀ¼ÀÄ £ÉêÀÄPÀUÉÆArgÀĪÀÅ¢®èªÉAzÀÆ, EgÀĪÀ 03 gÁdå ¸ÀPÁðgÀ¢AzÀ £ÉêÀÄPÀUÉÆAqÀ £ÉÆÃljUÀ½UÉ PÉ®¸ÀzÀ MvÀÛqÀ eÁ¹Û¬ÄgÀĪÀÅzÀjAzÀ, MAzÀÄ ºÉZÀÄѪÀj £ÉÆÃlj ºÀÄzÉÝAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¸ÀÈf¸ÀĪÀ CªÀ±ÀåPÀvÉ EzÉ JAzÀÄ ªÀgÀ¢AiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¤ÃrgÀÄvÁÛgÉ.

CzÀgÀAvÉ, ¥ÀæzsÁ£À f¯Áè ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ¸ÀvÀæ £ÁåAiÀiÁ¢üñÀgÀÄ, ¨ÁUÀ®PÉÆÃmÉ f Éè EªÀgÀÄ »jAiÀÄ ¢ªÁt £ÁåAiÀiÁ¢üñÀgÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ¥Àæ.zÀ.£Áå.zÀA. £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄ, ©Ã¼ÀV EªÀgÀ ªÀgÀ¢AiÀÄ£ÀÄß ®UÀwÛ¹, ªÉÄÃ É NzÀ¯ÁzÀ (3)gÀ°è ¢£ÁAPÀ : 25-09-2014gÀ ¥ÀvÀæzÀ°è ©Ã¼ÀV PÀAzÁAiÀÄ vÁ®ÆèQ£À°è gÁdå ¸ÀPÁðgÀ¢AzÀ £ÉêÀÄPÀUÉÆAqÀ 03 £ÉÆÃljUÀ½zÀÄÝ, ªÀÄvÉÆÛAzÀÄ ºÉZÀÄѪÀj £ÉÆÃlj ºÀÄzÉÝAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¸ÀÈf¸ÀĪÀAvÉ PÉÆÃjgÀÄvÁÛgÉ.

ªÉÄð£À ªÀgÀ¢UÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¸ÀPÁðgÀªÀÅ ¥Àj²Ã°¹zÉ. CzÀgÀAvÉ F DzÉñÀ.

ÀPÁðgÀzÀ DzÉñÀ ÀASÉå : ¯Á 142 J¯ï¹J¯ï 2013, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ, ¢£ÁAPÀ : 03-11-2014.

¥Àæ¸ÁÛªÀ£ÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß PÀÆ®APÀµÀªÁV ¥Àj²Ã°¹, ¨ÁUÀ®PÉÆÃmÉ f ÉèAiÀÄ ©Ã¼ÀV PÀAzÁAiÀÄ vÁ®ÆèQUÉ ¸ÁªÀðd¤PÀgÀ »vÀzÀȶ֬ÄAzÀ MAzÀÄ ºÉZÀÄѪÀj £ÉÆÃlj ºÀÄzÉÝAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¸ÀÈf¸À ÁVzÉ.

P.R. 818

SC-25

PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥Á®gÀ DzÉñÁ£ÀĸÁgÀ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ CªÀgÀ ºÉ Àj£À°è

eÉ. ®PÀëöät ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ C¢üãÀ PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð (¥Àæ sÁgÀ),

PÁ£ÀÆ£ÀÄ E¯ÁSÉ (DqÀ½vÀ-2).

PÁ£ÀÆ£ÀÄ ÀaªÁ®AiÀÄ

«µÀAiÀÄ : zsÁgÀªÁqÀ PÀAzÁAiÀÄ vÁ®ÆèPÀÄ, zsÁgÀªÁqÀ f Éè E°èUÉ MAzÀÄ ºÉZÀÄѪÀj £ÉÆÃlj ºÀÄzÉÝAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¸ÀÈf¸ÀĪÀ §UÉÎ

NzÀ ÁVzÉ : 1) ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ ¥ÀvÀæ ¸ÀASÉå: ¯Á 241 J¯ï¹J¯ï 2014, ¢£ÁAPÀ: 09-06-2014

2) ¥ÀæzsÁ£À f¯Áè ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ¸ÀvÀæ £ÁåAiÀiÁ¢üñÀgÀÄ, zsÁgÀªÁqÀ f Éè gÀªÀgÀ ¥ÀvÀæ ¢£ÁAPÀ: 09-07-2014

3) f¯Áè¢üPÁjUÀ¼À PÁAiÀiÁð®AiÀÄ, zsÁgÀªÁqÀ f ÉègÀªÀgÀ ¥ÀvÀæ ¢£ÁAPÀ: 01-10-2014

¥Àæ¸ÁÛªÀ£É:

¸ÀPÁðgÀªÀÅ gÁdåzÀ J¯Áè PÀAzÁAiÀÄ vÁ®ÆèPÀÄUÀ½UÉ MAzÉÆAzÀÄ £ÉÆÃlj ºÀÄzÉÝAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¸ÀÈf¸À®Ä wêÀiÁð¤¹zÀÄÝ, CzÀgÀAvÉ, ªÉÄÃ É NzÀ ÁzÀ (1)gÀ ¢£ÁAPÀ: 09-06-2014gÀ ¥ÀvÀæzÀ°è zsÁgÀªÁqÀ f ÉèAiÀÄ zsÁgÀªÁqÀ PÀAzÁAiÀÄ vÁ®ÆèQ£À°è ºÁ° EgÀĪÀ 05 £ÉÆÃljUÀ½UÉ ºÉaÑ£À PÉ®¸ÀzÀ MvÀÛqÀ«gÀĪÀ §UÉÎ ºÁUÀÆ E£ÀÆß ºÉZÀÄѪÀj ºÀÄzÉÝUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¸ÀÈf¸ÀĪÀ CªÀ±ÀåPÀvÉ EzÉAiÉÄà JA§ §UÉÎ ¸ÀªÀÄxÀð¤ÃAiÀÄ «ªÀgÀuÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß MzÀV¸ÀĪÀAvÉ ¥ÀæzsÁ£À f¯Áè ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ¸ÀvÀæ £ÁåAiÀiÁ¢üñÀgÀÄ, zsÁgÀªÁqÀ f Éè ªÀÄvÀÄÛ f¯Áè¢üPÁjUÀ¼ÀÄ, zsÁgÀªÁqÀ f Éè EªÀgÀÄUÀ¼À£ÀÄß PÉÆÃgÀ ÁVvÀÄÛ.

¥ÀæzsÁ£À f¯Áè ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ¸ÀvÀæ £ÁåAiÀiÁ¢üñÀgÀÄ, zsÁgÀªÁqÀ f Éè EªÀgÀÄ ªÉÄÃ É NzÀ ÁzÀ (2)gÀ ¢£ÁAPÀ: 09-07-2014gÀ ¥ÀvÀæzÀ°è zsÁgÀªÁqÀ vÁ®ÆèQ£À°è 05 d£À £ÉÆÃljUÀ¼ÀÄ PÀvÀðªÀå ¤ªÀð»¸ÀÄwÛzÀÄÝ, MlÄÖ d£À ÀASÉåAiÀÄÄ 2,18,961 QÌAvÀ ºÉaÑUÉ EzÀÄÝ, 126 ºÀ½îUÀ¼À£ÀÄß M¼ÀUÉÆArzÀÄÝ, zsÁgÀªÁqÀ f¯Áè PÉÃAzÀæªÁVzÀÄÝ, f¯Áè £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ »jAiÀÄ ºÁUÀÆ QjAiÀÄ ¢ªÁt £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ, f¯Áè¢üPÁjUÀ¼À PÀbÉÃj, PÀ£ÁðlPÀ «±Àé«zÁ央AiÀÄ, PÀȶ «±Àé«zÁ央AiÀÄ, f¯Áè ªÀÄvÀÄÛ vÁ®ÆèPÀÄ ªÀÄlÖzÀ J¯Áè PÀbÉÃjUÀ¼ÀÄ PÁAiÀÄð¤ªÀð»¸ÀÄwÛzÀÄÝ, EzÀjAzÀ £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄPÉÌ §gÀĪÀ ¸ÁªÀðd¤PÀgÀ ¸ÀASÉåAiÀÄÄ ºÉZÁÑUÀÄwÛzÀÄÝ, PÀgÁgÀÄ ¥ÀvÀæ ¥ÀæªÀiÁt ¥ÀvÀæ EvÀgÉ £ÉÆÃlj PÁAiÀÄðUÀ¼ÀÄ ºÉaÑUÉ DUÀÄwÛzÀÄÝ, ¸ÀzÀå PÁAiÀÄð¤ªÀð»¸ÀÄwÛgÀĪÀ £ÉÆÃljUÀ¼À ªÉÄÃ É PÉ®¸À MvÀÛqÀ ºÉZÁÑVgÀĪÀÅjAzÀ, MAzÀÄ ºÉZÀÄѪÀj £ÉÆÃlj ºÀÄzÉÝAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¸ÀÈf¸ÀĪÀ CªÀ±ÀåPÀvÉ EzÉ JAzÀÄ ªÀgÀ¢AiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¤ÃrgÀÄvÁÛgÉ.

CzÀgÀAvÉ, C¥ÀgÀ f¯Áè¢üPÁjUÀ¼ÀÄ, zsÁgÀªÁqÀ f Éè EªÀgÀÄ vÀºÀ²Ã¯ÁÝgÀgÀ PÁAiÀiÁð®AiÀÄ, zsÁgÀªÁqÀ EªÀgÀ ªÀgÀ¢AiÀÄ£ÀÄß ®UÀwÛ¹, ªÉÄÃ É NzÀ¯ÁzÀ (3)gÀ ¢£ÁAPÀ: 01-10-2014gÀ ¥ÀvÀæzÀ°è ¸ÀzÀj vÁ®ÆèQ£À d£À ¸ÀASÉå 2,18,961 EzÀÄÝ C£ÉÃPÀ ²PÀët ¸ÀA¸ÉÜUÀ¼À PÁAiÀÄð¸ÁÜ£À ªÀÄvÀÄÛ f¯Áè PÉÃAzÀæªÁVgÀĪÀÅzÀjAzÀ, ºÁ° PÁAiÀÄð¤ªÀð»¸ÀÄwÛgÀĪÀ £ÉÆÃljUÀ½UÉ PÉ®¸ÀzÀ MvÀÛqÀ«gÀĪÀÅzÀjAzÀ, zsÁgÀªÁqÀ PÀAzÁAiÀÄ vÁ®ÆèQUÉ MAzÀÄ ºÉZÀÄѪÀj £ÉÆÃlj ºÀÄzÉÝAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¸ÀÈf¸ÀĪÀAvÉ PÉÆÃjgÀÄvÁÛgÉ.

ªÉÄð£À ªÀgÀ¢UÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¸ÀPÁðgÀªÀÅ ¥Àj²Ã°¹zÉ. CzÀgÀAvÉ, F DzÉñÀ.

Page 28: ¨ÁUÀ 1 - KarPage-81-124).pdf · 22/01/2015  · (e) Shri E. Rama Murthy had submitted a revised sketch on 31/5/2002 reducing the area to an extent of 380 acres. It was found that

PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ, d£ÀªÀj 22, 2015 sÁUÀ 1 108

¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ DzÉñÀ ¸ÀASÉå: ¯Á 241 J¯ï¹J¯ï 2014, ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ, ¢£ÁAPÀ: 11-11-2014

¥Àæ¸ÁÛªÀ£ÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß PÀÆ®APÀµÀªÁV ¥Àj²Ã°¹, zsÁgÀªÁqÀ f ÉèAiÀÄ zsÁgÀªÁqÀ PÀAzÁAiÀÄ vÁ®ÆèQUÉ ¸ÁªÀðd¤PÀgÀ »vÀzÀȶ֬ÄAzÀ MAzÀÄ ºÉZÀÄѪÀj £ÉÆÃlj ºÀÄzÉÝAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¸ÀÈf¸À ÁVzÉ.

P.R. 876

SC - 25

PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥Á®gÀ DzÉñÁ£ÀĸÁgÀ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ CªÀgÀ ºÉ Àj£À°è

eÉ. ®PÀëöät ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ C¢üãÀ PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð (¥Àæ sÁgÀ),

PÁ£ÀÆ£ÀÄ E¯ÁS É (DqÀ½vÀ-2)

M¼ÁqÀ½vÀÀ ÀaªÁ®AiÀÄ «µÀAiÀÄ : ²æà JA. £ÀAd¥Àà, ¦.J¸ï.L., ɼÀPÀªÁr ¥Éưøï oÁuÉ, ªÀÄAqÀå f Éè EªÀgÀ ªÉÄîä£À«AiÀÄ §UÉÎ

CAwªÀÄ DzÉñÀ

NzÀ¯ÁVzÉ : 1) ²¸ÀÄÛ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀ ºÁUÀÆ ¥Éưøï C¢üÃPÀëPÀgÀÄ, ªÉÄʸÀÆgÀÄ f Éè, ªÉÄʸÀÆgÀÄ EªÀgÀ DzÉñÀ ¸ÀASÉå: ²PÉë/57/2012, ¢£ÁAPÀ: 29-01-2013

2) ªÉÄîä£À« ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀ ºÁUÀÆ DgÀPÀëPÀ ªÀĺÁ ¤jÃPÀëPÀgÀÄ, zÀQët ªÀ®AiÀÄ, ªÉÄʸÀÆgÀÄ EªÀgÀ DzÉñÀ ¸ÀASÉå: C¦Ã®Ä/66/2012-13, (N.©. ¸ÀASÉå: 19/2013-14) ¢£ÁAPÀ: 29-05-2013

3) CfðzÁgÀgÀ ¥ÀjµÀÌgÀt ªÉÄîä£À« Cfð ¢£ÁAPÀ: 03-10-2013 4) ªÀĺÁ ¤zÉÃð±ÀPÀgÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ DgÀPÀëPÀ ªÀĺÁ ¤jÃPÀëPÀgÀÄ, ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ, EªÀgÀ ¥ÀvÀæ ¸ÀASÉå: C¦Ã®Ä

(2)58/2013-14 ¢£ÁAPÀ:20-12-2013 5) PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ÉÆÃPÀ ÉêÁ DAiÉÆÃUÀzÀ ¥ÀvÀæ ¸ÀASÉå: ¦J¸ï¹ 262 ¹J£ïJ¸ï 2013,

¢£ÁAPÀ: 18-10-2014 ¥Àæ¸ÁÛªÀ£É:

²æà JA. £ÀAd¥Àà, ¦J¸ïL, ɼÀPÀªÁr ¥Éưøï oÁuÉ, ªÀÄAqÀå f Éè (E£ÀÄß ªÀÄÄAzÉ CfðzÁgÀgÉAzÀÄ PÀgÉAiÀÄ®àqÀĪÀ) EªÀgÀÄ F »AzÉ ©ÃZÀ£ÀºÀ½î ¥Éưøï oÁuÉ, ªÉÄʸÀÆgÀÄ E°è PÀvÀðªÀå ¤ªÀð»¸ÀÄwÛzÁÝUÀ, PÀvÀðªÀåzÀ°è zÀÄ£ÀðqÀvÉ ¨ÉÃdªÁ¨ÁÝjvÀ£À ¥ÀæzÀ²ð¹zÀ PÁgÀtzÀ ªÉÄÃ É EªÀgÀ «gÀÄzÀÞ PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå ¥Éưøï (²¸ÀÄÛ £ÀqÀªÀ½) ¤AiÀĪÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ 1965gÀ ¤AiÀĪÀÄ 7gÀr F PɼÀPÀAqÀ zÉÆõÁgÉÆÃ¥ÀuÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ºÉÆj¸À ÁVzÉ.

zÉÆõÁgÉÆÃ¥ÀuÉ:-

1. ``¤ÃªÀÅ ¹.¦.L.gÀªÀgÀ UÀªÀÄ£ÀPÉÌ vÁgÀzÉÃ, ¢£ÁAPÀ: 21-05-2012gÀ ©ÃZÀ£ÀºÀ½î oÁuÁ ¢£ÀZÀjAiÀÄ°è ¹.¦.L. ªÀÄvÀÄÛ r.J¸ï.¦.gÀªÀjUÉ w½¹, SÁ¬Ä É ªÉÄÃ É «±ÁæAwUÉ vÉgÀ¼ÀÄwÛgÀĪÀÅzÁV, ¸ÀļÀÄî ªÀiÁ»wAiÀÄ£ÀÄß £ÀªÀÄÆ¢¹ ºÉÆÃVgÀĪÀÅzÀgÀ ªÀÄÆ®PÀ zÀĪÀðvÀð£É ¥ÀæzÀ²ð¹gÀÄwÛÃj,

2. SÁ¬Ä É «±ÁæAwAiÉÄAzÀÄ ¢£ÁAPÀ: 21-05-2012gÀAzÀÄ oÁuÁ ¢£ÀZÀjAiÀÄ°è £ÀªÀÄÆ¢¹ ºÉÆÃzÀªÀgÀÄ ¢£ÁAPÀ: 24-08-2012gÀAzÀÄ PÀvÀðªÀåPÉÌ ªÀgÀ¢ ªÀiÁrPÉÆArzÀÝgÀÆ ¸ÀºÀ, EzÀĪÀgÉ«UÀÆ SÁ¬Ä¯É CªÀ¢ü ¢£ÁAPÀ: 21-05-2012jAzÀ 23-08-2012gÀªÀgÉV£À SÁ¬Ä É CªÀ¢üAiÀÄ gÀeÉ EvÀåxÀð¥Àr¹PÉƼÀî®Ä gÀeÉ CfðAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¸À°è ÀzÉà CwêÀªÁzÀ ÉÃdªÁ¨ÁÝj ºÁUÀÆ ¤®ðPÀëöåvÉ ¥ÀæzÀ²ð¹gÀÄwÛÃj.

ªÉÄîÌAqÀ DgÉÆÃ¥ÀzÀ ªÉÄÃ¯É CfðzÁgÀgÀ ¸ÀªÀÄeÁ¬Ä¶ ¥ÀqÉzÀÄ, CzÀ£ÉÆߥÀàzÀ ²¸ÀÄÛ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀ ºÁUÀÆ ¥Éưøï C¢üÃPÀëPÀgÀÄ, ªÉÄʸÀÆgÀÄ f Éè, ªÉÄʸÀÆgÀÄ EªÀgÀÄ ªÉÄÃ É PÀæªÀÄ ¸ÀASÉå: (1)gÀ°è NzÀ¯ÁzÀ ¢£ÁAPÀ: 29-01-2013gÀ DzÉñÀzÀ°è EªÀgÀ UÉÊgÀÄ ºÁdj CªÀ¢ü ¢£ÁAPÀ: 21-05-2012jAzÀ ¢£ÁAPÀ: 23-08-2012gÀªÀgÉUÉ ªÉÃvÀ£À gÀ»vÀ gÀeÉAiÉÄAzÀÄ ¥ÀjUÀt¹ DzÉò¹gÀÄvÁÛgÉ.

F DzÉñÀzÀ «gÀÄzÀÞ ¸À°è¹zÀ ªÉÄîä£À«AiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¥Àj²Ã°¹zÀ ªÉÄîä£À« ºÁUÀÆ DgÀPÀëPÀ ªÀĺÁ ¤jÃPÀëPÀgÀÄ, zÀQët ªÀ®AiÀÄ, ªÉÄʸÀÆgÀÄ EªÀgÀÄ ¢£ÁAPÀ: 29-05-2013gÀ DzÉñÀzÀ°è ªÉÄîä£À«AiÀÄ£ÀÄß wgÀ ÀÌj¹gÀÄvÁÛgÉ.

F JgÀqÀÆ DzÉñÀUÀ¼À «gÀÄzÀÞ D.¥ÉÆ.C.gÀªÀgÀÄ ¸ÀPÁðgÀPÉÌ ¥ÀjµÀÌgÀt ªÉÄîä£À«AiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¸À°è¹gÀÄvÁÛgÉ. ¥ÀjµÀÌgÀt ªÉÄîä£À«AiÀÄ°è£À ªÁzÁA±ÀUÀ¼À£ÀÄß zÁR ÉUÀ¼ÉÆA¢UÉ ¥Àj²Ã°¸À ÁVzÉ. ¥ÀjµÀÌgÀt ªÉÄîä£À«zÁgÀgÀÄ F »AzÉ ©ÃZÀ£ÀºÀ½î ¥Éưøï oÁuÉAiÀÄ°è PÀvÀðªÀå ¤ªÀð»¸ÀÄwÛzÁÝUÀ C£ÁgÉÆÃUÀåzÀ ¤«ÄvÀÛ ¢£ÁAPÀ: 21-05-2012gÀAzÀÄ ºÉZï.r. PÉÆÃmÉAiÀÄ ¹.¦.L. ºÁUÀÆ ºÀÄt¸ÀÆgÀÄ r.ªÉÊ.J¸ï.¦. EªÀjUÉ F ¸ÀA§AzsÀ ªÀiÁ»w w½¹ oÁuÁ ¢£ÀZÀjAiÀÄ°è £ÀªÀÄÆ¢¹zÀÄÝ, oÁuÁ¢üPÁjAiÀĪÀgÀ ¢£ÀZÀj ¥ÀĸÀÛPÀzÀ ¥ÀæwAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¥Àj²Ã°¹zÁUÀ ¢£ÁAPÀ: 21-05-2012gÀAzÀÄ ªÀÄzsÁåºÀß 12-50PÉÌ vÀªÀÄä C£ÁgÉÆÃUÀåzÀ ¤«ÄvÀÛ ºÉÆÃUÀĪÀÅzÁV F ¸ÀA§AzsÀ ¹.¦.L. ªÀÄvÀÄÛ r.ªÉÊ.J¸ï.¦., EªÀgÉÆA¢UÉ ZÀað¹gÀĪÀÅzÁV £ÀªÀÄÆ¢¹gÀÄvÁÛgÉ. ¥ÀjµÀÌgÀt ªÉÄîä£À«zÁgÀgÀÄ ¤ÃrgÀĪÀ ªÉÊzÀåQÃAiÀÄ ¥ÀæªÀiÁt ¥ÀvÀæUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¥Àj²Ã°¹zÁUÀ ¸ÀzÀjAiÀĪÀgÀÄ C£ÁgÉÆÃUÀå¢AzÀ §¼À®ÄwÛzÀÝgÉAzÀÄ zÀÈqsÀ¥ÀqÀĪÀ »£Éß ÉAiÀÄ°è CfðzÁgÀgÀ ¥ÀjµÀÌgÀt ªÉÄîä£À«AiÀÄ£ÀÄß sÁUÀ±ÀB ¥ÀÄgÀ ÀÌj¹ ²¸ÀÄÛ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀzÀ zÀAqÀ£ÁzÉñÀªÀ£ÀÄß ªÀiÁ¥Àðr¸ÀĪÀ PÀÄjvÀAvÉ NzÀ ÁzÀ (4)gÀ ¥ÀvÀæzÀ°è PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ÉÆÃPÀ ÉêÁ DAiÉÆÃUÀzÀ ¸ÀºÀªÀÄwAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¥ÀqÉzÀÄ ¸ÀPÁðgÀªÀÅ F PɼÀPÀAqÀAvÉ DzÉò¹zÉ.

Page 29: ¨ÁUÀ 1 - KarPage-81-124).pdf · 22/01/2015  · (e) Shri E. Rama Murthy had submitted a revised sketch on 31/5/2002 reducing the area to an extent of 380 acres. It was found that

sÁUÀ 1 PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ, d£ÀªÀj 22, 2015 109

¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ DzÉñÀ ¸ÀASÉå: ME 146 ¥ÉƹC 2013, ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ, ¢£ÁAPÀ: 19-11-2014.

¥Àæ¸ÁÛªÀ£ÉAiÀÄ°è «ªÀj¹gÀĪÀ PÁgÀtUÀ¼À »£Éß ÉAiÀÄ°è, PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¥Éưøï C¢ü¤AiÀĪÀÄ 1963gÀ ¸ÉPÀë£ï 25 gÀrAiÀÄ°è ¸ÀPÁðgÀPÉÌ ¥ÀæzÀvÀÛªÁzÀ C¢üPÁgÀªÀ£ÀÄß ZÀ¯Á¬Ä¹, ²æà JA. £ÀAd¥Àà, ¦J¸ïL, ɼÀPÀªÁr ¥Éưøï oÁuÉ, ªÀÄAqÀå f¯Éè EªÀjUÉ ²¸ÀÄÛ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀªÀÅ «¢ü¹gÀĪÀ ¢£ÁAPÀ: 21-05-2012jAzÀ ¢£ÁAPÀ: 23-08-2012gÀªÀgÉUÉ ªÉÃvÀ£À gÀ»vÀ gÀeÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ªÀiÁ¥Àðr¹, ªÉÊzÀåQÃAiÀÄ PÁgÀtUÀ¼À ªÉÄð£À ¥ÀjªÀwðvÀ gÀeÉAiÀÄ£ÁßV JAzÀÄ ªÀiÁ¥Àðr¹ DzÉò¹zÉ.

P.R. 877

PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥Á®gÀ DzÉñÁ£ÀĸÁgÀ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ CªÀgÀ ºÉ Àj£À°è

eÉ.r. ªÀÄzsÀÄZÀAzÀæ vÉÃd¹é, ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ C¢üãÀ PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð,

M¼ÁqÀ½vÀ E¯ÁSÉ (¥ÉÆ°Ã¸ï ¸ÉêÉUÀ¼ÀÄ)

ªÀ Àw ÀaªÁ®AiÀÄ

«µÀAiÀÄ : PÀ£ÁðlPÀ zsÁgÀtÂÃAiÀÄ ªÀ Àw ¤Ãw-2013gÀ ¥ÀÄ£Àgï gÀZÀ£É ºÁUÀÆ C£ÀĵÁ×£À-G¸ÀÄÛªÁjUÁV G£ÀßvÀ C¢üPÁgÀAiÀÄÄPÀÛ ¸À«Äw £ÉëĸÀĪÀ PÀÄjvÀÄ

NzÀ¯ÁVzÉ : ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ DzÉñÀ ¸ÀASÉå: ªÀE 49 PÀUÀȪÀÄA 2013, ¢£ÁAPÀ: 28-10-2014

¥Àæ¸ÁÛªÀ£É:

PÀ£ÁðlPÀ £ÀUÀgÀ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ¥ÀlÖt ¥ÀæzÉñÀUÀ¼À°è ªÀÄ£ÉUÀ¼À ¨ÉÃrPÉ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ CªÀÅUÀ¼À ® sÀåvÉ £ÀqÀÄªÉ CUÁzsÀ CAvÀgÀ EgÀĪÀÅzÀ£ÀÄß UÀªÀĤ¹, ¸ÀªÀiÁdzÀ PÀrªÉÄ DzÁAiÀÄzÀ ªÀUÀðzÀ d£ÀjUÀÆ ¸ÀºÀ D ¥ÀæzÉñÀUÀ¼À°è PÉÊUÉlÄPÀĪÀ zÀgÀzÀ°è ªÀÄ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß MzÀV¸ÀĪÀ GzÉÝñÀ¢AzÀ PÀ£ÁðlPÀ zsÁgÀtÂÃAiÀÄ ªÀ Àw ¤Ãw-2013C£ÀÄß ªÉÄÃ É NzÀ ÁzÀ ¸ÀPÁðj DzÉñÀzÀ ªÀÄÆ®PÀ eÁjUÉ vÀgÀ¯ÁVzÉ.

zsÁgÀtÂÃAiÀÄ ªÀ Àw ¤Ãw-2013C£ÀÄß C£ÀĵÁ×£ÀUÉƽ¸À®Ä PÀ£ÁðlPÀ UÀȺÀ ªÀÄAqÀ½AiÀÄ£ÀÄß gÁdå ªÀÄlÖzÀ £ÉÆÃqÀ ï KeɤìAiÀiÁV £ÉëĸÀ ÁVzÉ. gÁdåzÀ°è ¸ÀzÀj ªÀ¸Àw ¤ÃwAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¸ÀªÀÄ¥ÀðPÀªÁV C£ÀĵÁ×£ÀUÉƽ¸À®Ä PÀæªÀÄPÉÊUÉƼÀî¯ÁVzÀÄÝ, ¤ÃwAiÀÄ£ÀÄß C£ÀĵÁ×£ÀUÉƽ¸ÀĪÀ ºÀAvÀUÀ¼À°è JzÀÄgÁUÀÄwÛgÀĪÀ ºÀ®ªÁgÀÄ vÉÆqÀPÀÄUÀ¼À£ÀÄß £ÉÆÃqÉ ï KeɤìAiÀÄÄ ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ UÀªÀÄ£ÀPÉÌ vÀA¢gÀÄvÀÛzÉ. F ¤ÃwAiÀÄ°è£À UÀÄt ÉÆÃ¥ÀUÀ¼À PÀÄjvÀÄ ¸ÁPÀµÀÄÖ ¸À sÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß £Àqɹ PÀÆ®APÀµÀªÁV ¥Àj²Ã°¸À ÁVgÀÄvÀÛzÉ. ºÁ° ¤ÃwUÉ wzÀÄÝ¥ÀrUÀ¼À£ÀÄß vÀgÀĪÀ CxÀªÁ ¥ÀjµÀÌj¸ÀĪÀ §UÉÎ ¥Àj²Ã°¸ÀĪÀAvÉ £ÉÆÃqÉ ï KeɤìAiÀÄÄ ¥Àæ¸ÁÛ¦¹gÀÄvÀÛzÉ.

ªÀÄÄAzÀĪÀgÉzÀÄ, F ¤ÃwAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¥ÀÄ£Àgï gÀa¸ÀĪÀ CxÀªÁ wzÀÄÝ¥Àr ªÀiÁqÀĪÀ ¸ÀAzÀ sÀðzÀ°è ¸ÀA§AzsÀ¥ÀlÖ E¯ÁSÉ/¸ÀA¸ÉÜUÀ¼ÉÆA¢UÉ ¸ÀªÀÄ ÉÆÃZÀ£É £ÀqÉ À®Ä ºÁUÀÆ F ¤ÃwAiÀÄ£ÀÄß C£ÀĵÁ×£ÀUÉƽ¹gÀĪÀ EvÀgÉ gÁdåUÀ¼ÁzÀ gÁd¸ÁÜ£À, UÀÄdgÁvï ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ªÀĺÁgÁµÀÖçUÀ¼À ªÀiÁzÀjAiÀÄ£ÀÄß C sÀå¹¹, D »£Éß ÉAiÀÄ°è ¸ÀA§A¢ü¹zÀ PÁAiÉÄÝ/¤AiÀĪÀÄUÀ½UÉ MmÁÖgÉ wzÀÄÝ¥ÀrAiÀÄ£ÀÄß vÀgÀĪÀ §UÉÎ ¥Àj²Ã°¸À ÉÃPÉA§ C©ü¥ÁæAiÀÄ F ¸ÀA§AzsÀ £ÀqÉzÀ ¸À sÉUÀ¼À°è ªÀåPÀÛªÁVgÀÄvÀÛzÉ.

F »£Éß ÉAiÀÄ°è ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ ºÀAvÀzÀ°è ¸ÀÆPÀÛ ¤zsÁðgÀ vÉUÉzÀÄPÉƼÀî®Ä G£ÀßvÀ C¢üPÁgÀAiÀÄÄPÀÛ ¸À«ÄwAiÀÄ£ÀÄß £ÉëĸÀĪÀ CUÀvÀåvÉ EzÉAiÉÄA§ÄzÀ£ÀÄß ªÀÄ£ÀUÀAqÀÄ, ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ C¥ÀgÀ ªÀÄÄRå PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð ªÀÄvÀÄÛ C©üªÀÈ¢Þ DAiÀÄÄPÀÛgÀ CzsÀåPÀëvÉAiÀÄ°è G£ÀßvÀ C¢üPÁgÀAiÀÄÄPÀÛ ¸À«ÄwAiÀÄ£ÀÄß gÀa¸À®Ä F PɼÀPÀAqÀAvÉ DzÉñÀ ºÉÆgÀr¹zÉ.

¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ DzÉñÀ ¸ÀASÉå: ªÀE 49 PÀUÀȪÀÄA 2013 ( sÁUÀ-1), ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ, ¢£ÁAPÀ: 20-09-2014

ªÉÄð£À ¥Àæ¸ÁÛªÀ£ÉAiÀÄ »£Éß ÉAiÀÄ°è, PÀ£ÁðlPÀ zsÁgÀtÂÃAiÀÄ ªÀ Àw ¤Ãw-2013gÀ ¥ÀÄ£Àgï gÀZÀ£É ºÁUÀÆ C£ÀĵÁ×£À PÀÄjvÀÄ ¥Àj²Ã°¸ÀĪÀ ¸À®ÄªÁV F PɼÀPÀAqÀAvÉ G£ÀßvÀ C¢üPÁgÀAiÀÄÄPÀÛ ¸À«Äw (High Power Committee) AiÀÄ£ÀÄß gÀa¸À ÁVzÉ.

1. ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ C¥ÀgÀ ªÀÄÄRå PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð ªÀÄvÀÄÛ C©üªÀÈ¢Þ DAiÀÄÄPÀÛgÀÄ ... CzsÀåPÀëgÀÄ

2. ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ C¥ÀgÀ ªÀÄÄRå PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð, DyðPÀ E¯ÁSÉ ... ¸ÀzÀ ÀågÀÄ

3. ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ C¥ÀgÀ ªÀÄÄRå PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð, UÁæ«ÄÃuÁ©üªÀÈ¢Þ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ

¥ÀAZÁAiÀÄvï gÁeï E¯ÁSÉ ... ¸ÀzÀ ÀågÀÄ

4. ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ C¥ÀgÀ ªÀÄÄRå PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð, £ÀUÀgÁ©üªÀÈ¢Þ E¯ÁSÉ ... ¸ÀzÀ ÀågÀÄ

5. ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ ¥ÀæzsÁ£À PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð, ªÀÄÆ®¸ËPÀAiÀÄð C©üªÀÈ¢Þ E¯ÁSÉ ... ¸ÀzÀ ÀågÀÄ

6. ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ ¥ÀæzsÁ£À PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð, PÀAzÁAiÀÄ E¯ÁSÉ ... ¸ÀzÀ ÀågÀÄ

7. ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ ¥ÀæzsÁ£À PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð, ªÀ¸Àw E¯ÁSÉ ... ¸ÀzÀ ÀågÀÄ

8. DAiÀÄÄPÀÛgÀÄ, PÀ£ÁðlPÀ UÀȺÀ ªÀÄAqÀ½, ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ ... ¸ÀzÀ Àå PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ðUÀ¼ÀÄ

Page 30: ¨ÁUÀ 1 - KarPage-81-124).pdf · 22/01/2015  · (e) Shri E. Rama Murthy had submitted a revised sketch on 31/5/2002 reducing the area to an extent of 380 acres. It was found that

PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ, d£ÀªÀj 22, 2015 sÁUÀ 1 110

¸ÀzÀj ¤ÃwAiÀÄ ¥ÀÄ£ÀgïgÀZÀ£É/C£ÀĵÁ×£ÀPÉÌ ¸ÀA§A¢ü¹zÀAvÉ ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ EvÀgÉ E¯ÁSÉUÀ¼À ¸ÀºÀPÁgÀ CUÀvÀåªÁzÀgÉ, D E¯ÁSÉUÀ¼À ¸À®ºÉ/ ¸ÀºÀPÁgÀªÀ£ÀÄß ¸ÀºÀ ¥ÀqÉzÀÄPÉƼÀîvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ.

P.R. 878

SC - 50

PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥Á®gÀ DeÁÕ£ÀĸÁgÀ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ CªÀgÀ ºÉ Àj£À°è

ÀAfêï PÀĪÀiÁgï, ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ ¥ÀæzsÁ£ÀÀ PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð,

ªÀ Àw E¯ÁSÉ

¥ÀæªÁ ÉÆÃzÀåªÀÄ ÀaªÁ®AiÀÄ

«µÀAiÀÄ : £À«ÃPÀgÀt, ¤ªÀðºÀuÉ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ªÀUÁðªÀuÉ (ROMT) DzsÁgÀzÀ°è 18 ¥ÀæªÁ¸ÉÆÃzÀåªÀÄ ºÉÆÃmÉ ï/D¹ÛUÀ¼À£ÀÄß SÁ¸ÀV ªÀ®AiÀÄzÀ ¸ÀºÀ sÁVvÀézÀ°è ¤ªÀð»¸À®Ä ªÀÄAdÆgÁw

NzÀ¯ÁVzÉ : ¤zÉÃð±ÀPÀgÀÄ, ¥ÀæªÁ¸ÉÆÃzÀåªÀÄ E¯ÁSÉ EªÀgÀ PÀqÀvÀ ¸ÀASÉå: ¥ÀæE. AiÉÆÃ-2/54/2013-14 ( sÁUÀ-1)

¥Àæ¸ÁÛªÀ£É:

ªÉÄÃ É NzÀ ÁzÀ KPÀ PÀqÀvÀzÀ°è ¤zÉÃð±ÀPÀgÀÄ, ¥ÀæªÁ¸ÉÆÃzÀåªÀÄ E¯ÁSÉAiÀĪÀgÀÄ PÀ£ÁðlPÀzÀ°è ¥ÀæªÁ¹UÀjUÉ PÉÊUÉlPÀĪÀ ªÀ Àw ¸ËPÀAiÀÄðUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¤ÃqÀĪÀ GzÉÝñÀ¢AzÀ AiÀiÁwæ ¤ªÁ¸ÀUÀ¼À£ÀÄß, ±ÀAiÀÄ£À UÀȺÀUÀ¼À£ÀÄß, gÀ ÉÛ§¢AiÀÄ ¸Ë® sÀåUÀ¼À£ÀÄß MzÀV¸ÀÄwÛzÀÄÝ, MªÉÄä ¤«Äð¹zÀ £ÀAvÀgÀ PÁAiÀiÁðZÀgÀuÉUÁV ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ¤ªÀðºÀuÉUÁV CªÀÅUÀ¼À£ÀÄß PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå ¥ÀæªÁ¸ÉÆÃzÀåªÀÄ ¤UÀªÀÄ (KSTDC) ºÁUÀÆ CgÀtå ªÀ Àw ªÀÄvÀÄÛ «ºÁgÀzsÁªÀÄUÀ¼À ¸ÀA¸ÉÜUÉ (dAUÀ ï ¯ÁqÀÓ¸ï CAqï gÉ Ámïìð) (JLR) ªÀ»¹PÉÆnÖgÀÄvÀÛzÉ. F jÃw ¤UÀªÀÄ/¸ÀA¸ÉÜUÉ ªÀ»¹PÉÆnÖgÀĪÀ C£ÉÃPÀ ¸Ë® sÀåUÀ¼À ¥ÉÊQ 12 ¸Ë® sÀåUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¤ªÀðºÀuÉ ªÀiÁqÀ®Ä ¸ÁzsÀå«®èªÉAzÀÄ ¥ÀæªÁ¸ÉÆÃzÀåªÀÄ E¯ÁSÉUÉ »A¢gÀÄV¸À ÁVzÉ.

ªÉÄîÌAqÀ 12 ¸Ë® sÀåUÀ¼À®èzÉ, E¯ÁSÁ ªÀw¬ÄAzÀ ¤«Äð¹gÀĪÀ 7 AiÀiÁw椪Á¸À, qÁ«Äðlj ¸Ë® sÀåUÀ¼À£ÀÄß AiÀiÁjUÀÆ ¤ÃqÀzÉ ºÁUÀÆ E°èAiÀĪÀgÉ«UÀÆ ¤ªÀð»¸ÀzÉ ºÁUÉAiÉÄà G½¢gÀĪÀÅzÀjAzÀ, EzÀgÀ ¥ÀæAiÉÆÃd£À ¥ÀæªÁ¹UÀjUÉ zÉÆgÀPÀÄwÛ®èªÉAzÀÄ w½¸ÀÄvÁÛ, F 19 ¸Ë® sÀåUÀ¼À£ÀÄß SÁ¸ÀVÃAiÀĪÀjAzÀ ¤ªÀð»¸À®Ä wêÀiÁð¤¹, ¥ÁægÀA©üPÀªÁV F ¸ÀévÀÄÛUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¥Àæ¸ÀÄÛvÀ ¹ÜwUÀwUÀ¼À ¥ÀÆtð avÀætzÉÆA¢UÉ ªÀgÀ¢ ¤ÃqÀ®Ä ªÉÄ|| LqÉPï ¸ÀA¸ÉÜAiÀÄ£ÀÄß £ÉëĸÀ ÁVvÉÛAzÀÄ ªÀgÀ¢ ªÀiÁrgÀÄvÁÛgÉ.

ªÀÄÄAzÀĪÀgÉzÀÄ ªÉÄ|| LqÉPï ¸ÀA¸ÉÜ 19 ¸ÀévÀÄÛUÀ¼À ¹ÜwUÀwUÀ¼ÉÆA¢UÉ ªÀgÀ¢ ¤ÃrzÀÄÝ, ¸ÀzÀj ªÀgÀ¢AiÀÄ°è F D¹ÛUÀ¼ÀÄ ¥ÀæªÁ¸ÉÆÃzÀåªÀÄ D¸ÀQÛAiÀÄ vÁtUÀ¼À°è ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ¥ÀæzsÁ£À ¸ÀܼÀUÀ¼À°èzÀÝgÀÆ ¸ÀºÀ ²y¯ÁªÀ ÉÜAiÀÄ°èzÀÄÝ, CªÀÅUÀ¼À£ÀÄß PÁAiÀiÁðZÀgÀuÉUÉƽ¹, PÁ¥ÁrPÉÆAqÀÄ £À«ÃPÀj¸ÀĪÀ CUÀvÀåvÉ EgÀĪÀÅzÁV ºÁUÀÆ 133 PÉÆoÀrUÀ¼À£ÀÄß QæAiÀiÁvÀäPÀUÉƽ¸À§ºÀÄzÁVzÀÄÝ, 200PÀÆÌ ºÉZÀÄÑ PÉÆoÀrUÀ¼À «¸ÀÛgÀuÉUÉ CªÀPÁ±À«gÀĪÀÅzÁV w½¸À ÁVzÉ. F D¹ÛUÀ¼À ¥Àæ¸ÀÄÛvÀ ªÀiË®å ¸ÀĪÀiÁgÀÄ gÀÆ. 11.00 PÉÆÃnUÀ¼ÉAzÀÄ ªÀiË®åªÀiÁ¥À£À ªÀiÁrgÀÄvÁÛgÉ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ J¯Áè CUÀvÀå ¸Ë® sÀåUÀ¼ÀÄ CAzÀgÉ ±ËZÁ®AiÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ¥ÁQðAUï EvÁå¢UÀ¼À£ÀÄß MzÀV¸ÀĪÀÅzÀgÀ eÉÆvÉUÉ EªÀÅUÀ¼À £À«ÃPÀgÀt ªÀÄvÀÄÛ «¸ÀÛgÀuÉUÁV CAzÁdÄ ºÀÆrPÉUÉ ¸ÀĪÀiÁgÀÄ gÀÆ. 40.00 PÉÆÃn ¨ÉÃPÁUÀÄvÀÛzÉAzÀÄ, C®èzÉà F 19 D¹ÛUÀ¼À ªÁ¶ðPÀ ¤ªÀðºÀuÁ ªÉZÀѪÀÅ gÀÆ. 4.00 PÉÆÃnUÀ¼ÁUÀ§ºÀÄzÉAzÀÄ w½¹gÀÄvÁÛgÉ.

ªÀÄÄAzÀĪÀgÉzÀÄ, F jÃw £À«ÃPÀgÀt, ¤ªÀðºÀuÉ, ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ªÀUÁðªÀuÉ (ROMT) AiÉÆÃd£ÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß PÉÊUÉwÛPÉÆAqÀ°è, PɼÀPÀAqÀAvÉ ¤jÃQëvÀ ¥ÀæAiÉÆÃd£À zÉÆgÀPÀĪÀÅzÉAzÀÄ ªÀgÀ¢AiÀÄ°è w½¹gÀÄvÁÛgÉ.

1. F D¹ÛUÀ¼À£ÀÄß `ªÀÄAiÀÄÆgÀ' JA§ ºÉ¸Àj£À ªÀÄÄzÉæAiÀÄr (brand name) ¥ÀÄ£À±ÉÑÃvÀ£ÀUÉƽ¹ PÁAiÀiÁðZÀj¸À ÁUÀĪÀÅzÀÄ.

2. DAiÀĪÀåAiÀÄ ªÀUÀð, ¸ÀéZÀÒ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ DgÁªÀÄzÁAiÀÄPÀ ªÀ Àw, eÉÆvÉUÉ ±ËZÁ®AiÀÄ, ¥ÁQðAUï ªÀÄvÀÄÛ EvÀgÉ ªÀÄÆ® ¸ËPÀAiÀÄð ¸Ë® sÀåUÀ¼ÀÄ ¥ÀæªÁ¹UÀ½UÉ zÉÆgÉAiÀÄ®àqÀÄvÀÛªÉ.

3. ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ ªÉÄÃ¯É AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉà DyðPÀ ºÉÆgÉAiÀÄÄ GAmÁUÀĪÀÅ¢®è.

4. ¸ÀĪÀiÁgÀÄ 200 C¢üPÀ PÉÆoÀrUÀ¼ÀÄ ºÉZÁѼÀªÁUÀ°ªÉ.

5. 400 ¥ÀgÉÆÃPÀë ºÀÄzÉÝUÀ¼À dvÉAiÀÄ°è ¸ÀĪÀiÁgÀÄ 400 £ÉÃgÀ GzÉÆåÃUÀUÀ¼ÀÄ ¸ÀȶÖAiÀiÁUÀÄvÀÛzÉ ( sÁgÀvÀ ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ ºÀÄ£Ágï ¸É gÉÆÃeïUÁgï AiÉÆÃd£Á CrAiÀÄ°è ¥sÀ¯Á£ÀÄ sÀ«UÀ½UÉ ¸ÀܼÁªÀPÁ±ÀªÀ£ÀÄß MzÀV¸ÀÄvÀÛzÉ).

6. E¯ÁSÉUÉ ¸ÀĪÀiÁgÀÄ gÀÆ. 40.00 ®PÀëUÀ¼ÀªÀgÉUÉ DzÁAiÀÄ §gÀ°zÀÄÝ, F ºÀtªÀ£ÀÄß EvÀgÉ ¥ÀæªÁ¹ vÁtUÀ¼À°è£À ±ËZÁ®AiÀÄ ¸Ë® sÀåUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¤ªÀð»¸À®Ä, PÀÄrAiÀÄĪÀ ¤Ãj£À ¸Ë® sÀåUÀ¼À£ÀÄß MzÀV¸À®Ä, ªÀiÁ»w PÉÃAzÀæUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¤ªÀð»¸À®Ä, ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ¥ÀæPÀluÁ ¥sÀ®PÀUÀ¼À£ÀÄß C¼ÀªÀr¸À®Ä §¼À À¯ÁUÀĪÀÅzÀÄ.

ªÀÄÄAzÀĪÀgÉzÀÄ, F AiÉÆÃd£É Cr AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉà ºÀÆrPÉUÉ ¸ÀPÁðgÀªÀÅ ¤¢üAiÀÄ£ÀÄß MzÀV¸ÀĪÀ CªÀ±ÀåPÀvÉ EgÀĪÀÅ¢®èªÉAzÀÄ, §zÀ°UÉ, 30 ªÀµÀðUÀ¼À CªÀ¢üUÉ ¸ÀzÀj D¹ÛUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¤ÃqÀĪÀÅzÀjAzÀ ¸ÀĪÀiÁgÀÄ gÀÆ. 40 ®PÀëUÀ¼ÀªÀgÉUÉ DzÁAiÀĪÀÅ E¯ÁSÉUÉ §gÀÄvÀÛzÉ JAzÀÄ CAzÁf¹ AiÉÆÃd£Á ªÉZÀÑ, PÁAiÀÄð¤ªÀðºÀuÉ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ¤ªÀðºÀuÁ ªÉZÀÑUÀ¼ÀÄ EvÁå¢ «ªÀgÀzÀ eÉÆvÉUÉ F D¹ÛUÀ¼À ¥Àæ¸ÀÄÛvÀ ¹ÜwUÀwUÀ¼À MAzÀÄ AiÉÆÃd£Á gÀZÀ£Á ªÀgÀ¢ ºÁUÀÆ PÁAiÀiÁðZÀgÀuÉAiÀÄ 1£Éà ªÀµÀðzÀ°è£À CAzÁdÄ DzÁAiÀÄ, sÉÃnUÀ¼ÀÄ, ¥Àæ¸ÀÄÛvÀ ¹Üw EvÁå¢ «ªÀgÀUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¸À°è¹gÀÄvÁÛgÉAzÀÄ ¥ÀæªÁ¸ÉÆÃzÀåªÀÄ ¤zÉÃð±ÀPÀgÀÄ w½¸ÀÄvÁÛ, F ¸ÀévÀÄÛUÀ¼À£ÀÄß £À«ÃPÀgÀt, ¤ªÀðºÀuÉ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ªÀUÁðªÀuÉ (ROMT) DzsÁgÀzÀ°è SÁ¸ÀV ªÀ®AiÀÄzÀ ¸ÀºÀ sÁVvÀézÀ°è ¤ªÀð»¸À®Ä ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ DzÉñÀªÀ£ÀÄß PÉÆÃjgÀÄvÁÛgÉ.

Page 31: ¨ÁUÀ 1 - KarPage-81-124).pdf · 22/01/2015  · (e) Shri E. Rama Murthy had submitted a revised sketch on 31/5/2002 reducing the area to an extent of 380 acres. It was found that

sÁUÀ 1 PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ, d£ÀªÀj 22, 2015 111

¥Àæ¸ÁÛªÀ£ÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¥Àj²Ã°¹ ¸ÀPÁðgÀªÀÅ PɼÀPÀAqÀAvÉ DzÉò¹zÉ.

¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ DzÉñÀ ¸ÀASÉå: ¥ÀæE 175 ¥ÀæªÁAiÉÆà 2014, ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ, ¢£ÁAPÀ: 19-11-2014

¥Àæ¸ÁÛªÀ£ÉAiÀÄ°è «ªÀj¹gÀĪÀ CA±ÀUÀ¼À »£Éß ÉAiÀÄ°è, ¥ÀæªÁ¸ÉÆÃzÀåªÀÄ E¯ÁSÉ ªÀw¬ÄAzÀ ¤«Äð¹gÀĪÀ F DzÉñÀPÉÌ ®UÀwÛ¹gÀĪÀ C£ÀħAzsÀ-1gÀ°è£À 18 ºÉÆÃmɯï /D¹Û/¸Ë® sÀåUÀ¼À£ÀÄß PɼÀPÀAqÀ µÀgÀvÀÄÛUÀ½UÀ£ÀÄUÀÄtªÁV 30 ªÀµÀðUÀ¼À CªÀ¢üUÉ C£ÀħAzsÀ-2gÀ°è «ªÀj¹zÀAvÉ £À«ÃPÀgÀt, ¤ªÀðºÀuÉ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ªÀUÁðªÀuÉ (ROMT) DzsÁgÀzÀ°è SÁ¸ÀV ªÀ®AiÀÄzÀ ¸ÀºÀ sÁVvÀézÀ ªÀÄÆ®PÀ ¤ªÀð»¸À®Ä ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ ªÀÄAdÆgÁw ¤ÃqÀ ÁVzÉ.

1. £À«ÃPÀgÀt, ¤ªÀðºÀuÉ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ªÀUÁðªÀuÉ (ROMT) DzsÁgÀzÀ°è 18 ¥ÀæªÁ ÉÆÃzÀåªÀÄ D¹ÛUÀ¼À£ÀÄß 30 ªÀµÀðUÀ½UÉ SÁ ÀV ªÀ®AiÀÄzÀ ÀºÀ sÁVvÀézÀ ªÀÄÆ®PÀ ¤ªÀð» ÀĪÀÅzÀÄ.

2. F jÃw (ROMT) DzsÁgÀzÀ ªÉÄÃ É ¥Á®ÄzÁgÀgÀ DAiÉÄÌAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¥ÁgÀzÀ±ÀðPÀ ¤AiÀĪÀÄUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¥Á°¹ DAiÉÄÌ ªÀiÁqÀĪÀÅzÀÄ.

3. D¹ÛUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¥ÀÄ£À±ÉÑÃvÀ£ÀUÉƽ¹ `ªÀÄAiÀÄÆgÀ' JA§ ºÉ¸Àj£À ªÀÄÄzÉæAiÀÄr (brand) PÁAiÀiÁðZÀgÀuÉ ªÀiÁqÀĪÀÅzÀÄ.

4. Pre-qualification ºÁUÀÆ E-auction ¥ÀzÀÞwUÀ¼À£ÀÄß C£ÀÄ Àj¸ÀĪÀ ªÀÄÄSÁAvÀgÀ ÀzÀj ¸ÀévÀÄÛUÀ¼À£ÀÄß UÀÄwÛUÉ DzsÁgÀzÀ ªÉÄÃ É ¤ÃqÀĪÀÅzÀÄ.

5. ÀzÀj ÀévÀÄÛUÀ¼À£ÀÄß AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉà PÁgÀtPÀÆÌ UÀÄwÛUÉ CqÀ«qÀĪÀÅzÁUÀ°Ã/¥ÀgÀ sÁgÉ ªÀiÁqÀĪÀÅzÁUÀ°Ã ªÀiÁqÀ ÁgÀzÀÄ.

6. ÀzÀj ÀévÀÄÛUÀ¼À£ÀÄß UÀÄwÛUÉzÁgÀgÀÄ G¥ÀUÀÄwÛUÉ ¤ÃqÀ ÁgÀzÀÄ.

7. F jÃwAiÀÄ°è §gÀĪÀ DzÁAiÀĪÀ£ÀÄß EvÀgÉ ¥ÀæªÁ¹ vÁtUÀ¼À°è£À ±ËZÁ®AiÀÄ ¸Ë®¨sÀåUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¤ªÀð» À®Ä, PÀÄrAiÀÄĪÀ ¤Ãj£À ¸Ë®¨sÀåUÀ¼À£ÀÄß MzÀV À®Ä, ªÀiÁ»w PÉÃAzÀæUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¤ªÀð» À®Ä ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ¥ÀæPÀluÁ ¥sÀ®PÀUÀ¼À£ÀÄß C¼ÀªÀr À®Ä §¼À ÀĪÀÅzÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ CAvÀºÀ DzÁAiÀĪÀ£ÀÄß ¥ÀæªÁ ÉÆÃzÀåªÀÄ ¤zÉÃð±ÀPÀgÀ ¦.r. SÁvÉAiÀÄ°è oÉêÀt EqÀĪÀÅzÀÄ.

PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥Á®gÀ DzÉñÁ£ÀĸÁgÀ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ CªÀgÀ ºÉ Àj£À°è

ºÉZï.PÉ. gÀ«ªÀÄÆwð, ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ dAn PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð,

¥ÀæªÁ¸ÉÆÃzÀåªÀÄ E¯ÁSÉ

¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ DzÉñÀ ¸ÀASÉå: ¥ÀæE 175 ¥ÀæªÁAiÉÆà 2014, ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ, ¢£ÁAPÀ: 19-11-2014PÉÌ C£ÀħAzsÀ-1

PÀæªÀÄ ÀASÉå

ºÉÆÃmɯï/D¹Û/¸Ë®¨sÀåUÀ¼À ºÉ ÀgÀÄ vÁ®ÆèPÀÄ f Éè

1. ºÉÆÃmÉ ï ªÀÄAiÀÄÆgÀ ªÀÄ®¥Àæ sÀ, C±ÉÆÃPÀ£ÀUÀgÀ ɼÀUÁ« ɼÀUÁ«

2. ºÉÆÃmÉ ï ªÀÄAiÀÄÆgÀ ¥ÀĵÀàVj, ºÀ¼ÉéÃqÀÄ ÉîÆgÀÄ ºÁ¸À£À

3. AiÀiÁw椪Á¸À, ±ÁAw¸ÁUÀgÀ ZÀ£ÀßVj zÁªÀtUÉgÉ

4. AiÀiÁw椪Á¸À, ²PÁj¥ÀÄgÀ ²PÁj¥ÀÄgÀ ²ªÀªÉÆUÀÎ

5. AiÀiÁw椪Á¸À, zÉêÀgÁAiÀÄ£ÀzÀÄUÀð vÀĪÀÄPÀÆgÀÄ vÀĪÀÄPÀÆgÀÄ

6. gÀ ÉÛ§¢ ¸Ë® sÀå, UÁtÂUÁ¥ÀÄgÀ C¥ÀÓ¯ï¥ÀÄgÀ UÀÄ®âUÁð

7. qÁ«Äðlj, ªÉÄîÄPÉÆÃmÉ ¥ÁAqÀªÀ¥ÀÄgÀ ªÀÄAqÀå

8. AiÀiÁw椪Á¸À, LºÉÆ¼É ºÀÄ£ÀUÀÄAzï ¨ÁUÀ®PÉÆÃmÉ

9. gÀ ÉÛ§¢ ¸Ë® sÀå, ®PÀÄÌAr UÀzÀUÀ UÀzÀUÀ

10. ºÉÆÃmÉ ï ªÀÄAiÀÄÆgÀ ¸ÀªÀÄÄzÀæ, UÉÆÃPÀtð PÀĪÀÄl GvÀÛgÀ PÀ£ÀßqÀ

11. qÁ«Äðlj, ªÀÄÆqÀÄ©zÀgÉ ªÀÄAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ zÀQët PÀ£ÀßqÀ

12. ºÉÆÃmÉ ï ªÀÄAiÀÄÆgÀ sÀgÀZÀÄQÌ, ²ªÀ£À ÀªÀÄÄzÀæ PÉƼÉîÃUÁ® ZÁªÀÄgÁd£ÀUÀgÀ

13. ºÉÆÃmÉ ï ªÀÄAiÀÄÆgÀ PÉñÀªÀ, ¸ÉÆêÀÄ£ÁxÀ¥ÀÄgÀ n. £ÀgÀ¹Ã¥ÀÄgÀ ªÉÄʸÀÆgÀÄ

Page 32: ¨ÁUÀ 1 - KarPage-81-124).pdf · 22/01/2015  · (e) Shri E. Rama Murthy had submitted a revised sketch on 31/5/2002 reducing the area to an extent of 380 acres. It was found that

PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ, d£ÀªÀj 22, 2015 sÁUÀ 1 112

PÀæªÀÄ ÀASÉå

ºÉÆÃmɯï/D¹Û/¸Ë®¨sÀåUÀ¼À ºÉ ÀgÀÄ vÁ®ÆèPÀÄ f Éè

14. gÀ ÉÛ§¢ ¸Ë® sÀå, vÀtÂÚPÉƼÀ ¸ÀªÀzÀwÛ É¼ÀUÁ«

15. ºÉÆÃmÉ ï ªÀÄAiÀÄÆgÀ, zÉêÀgÁAiÀÄ£ÀzÀÄUÀð vÀĪÀÄPÀÆgÀÄ vÀĪÀÄPÀÆgÀÄ

16. gÀ ÉÛ§¢ ¸Ë® sÀå, vÉ®V §¸ÀªÀ£À ¨ÁUÉêÁr ©eÁ¥ÀÄgÀ

17. gÀ ÉÛ§¢ ¸Ë® sÀå, ²gÁr ¸ÀPÀ ÉñÀ¥ÀÄgÀ ºÁ¸À£À

18. ¥sÁ¸ïÖ¥sÀÄqï PËAlgï, C£ÉÆäÃqï eÉƬÄqÁ GvÀÛgÀ PÀ£ÀßqÀ

PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥Á®gÀ DzÉñÁ£ÀĸÁgÀ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ CªÀgÀ ºÉ Àj£À°è

ºÉZï.PÉ. gÀ«ªÀÄÆwð, ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ dAn PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð,

¥ÀæªÁ¸ÉÆÃzÀåªÀÄ E¯ÁSÉ

¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ DzÉñÀ ¸ÀASÉå: ¥ÀæE 175 ¥ÀæªÁAiÉÆà 2014, ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ, ¢£ÁAPÀ: 19-11-2014PÉÌ C£ÀħAzsÀ-2

Proposed implementation Structure

The Project be developed through private sector participation on ROMT framework as which entails the following factors:

I. The tourism property would be handed over to a private partner having efficient managerial skills and adequate

manpower to management the same for a period of 30 years. At the end of Agreement Period, there shall be an option

of extending the Agreement Period for a further period of 30 years on mutually agreed terms and conditions. After the

expiry of the Agreement period the tourism property would be handed back to Director of Tourism.

ii. The selected private partner shall be required to mobilize finances, design, construct and operate and maintain the said

properties as per the norms set out by Director of Tourism and other applicable laws.

iii. All these properties should fall under the category of "Mayura", which is the trademark of KSTDC and the private

partner would be required to promote the same trademark mandatorily in these properties.

iv. The tourism property should not be sold or leased out to any other private partner.

v. Annual payments is payable to Director of Tourism by the private partner throughout the agreement period.

vi. The selected private partner is required to renovate and refurbish the existing facilities.

vii. The selected private partner is also been given the option to undertake construction of additional facilities in each of the

tourism properties after obtaining the approval of Director of Tourism which would include the following:

a. Construction of Additional Rooms/Dormitories

b. Construction of Restaurant/Food court/Cafeteria

c. Shops/retail space for the benefits of tourists

d. First-aid centre/clinics

e. ATM

f. Water based activities (only applicable to Shanthisagara lake property) Other activities consistent with tourism

for the benefit of tourists, with prior approval of Director of Tourism.

viii. The selected private partner is required to construct/renovate the properties as per the construction standards provided

in the relevant and applicable laws.

ix. Operate and maintain the properties as per Good industry Standards.

x. The construction of additional facilities will be eligible for incentives under Expansion Projects category as per the

Karnataka Tourism Policy 2014-19.

H.K. RAVIMURTHY,

PR 879 Joint Secretary to Government,

SC 100 Tourism Department.

M¼ÁqÀ½vÀ ÀaªÁ®AiÀÄ

«µÀAiÀÄ : ²æà J¸ï.ªÉÊ. ªÉÆúÀ£ï, ¦J¸ïL, C§PÁj ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ¯Álj ¤µÉÃzsÀ zÀ¼À, PÉÆïÁgÀ f Éè, EªÀgÀ ¥ÀjµÀÌgÀt ªÉÄîä£À«AiÀÄ §UÉÎ CAwªÀÄ DzÉñÀ.

Page 33: ¨ÁUÀ 1 - KarPage-81-124).pdf · 22/01/2015  · (e) Shri E. Rama Murthy had submitted a revised sketch on 31/5/2002 reducing the area to an extent of 380 acres. It was found that

sÁUÀ 1 PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ, d£ÀªÀj 22, 2015 113

NzÀ¯ÁVzÉ : 1) ²¸ÀÄÛ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀ ºÁUÀÆ ¥Éưøï C¢üÃPÀëPÀgÀÄ, aPÀ̧¼Áî¥ÀÄgÀ f Éè, EªÀgÀ eÁÕ¥À£À ¸ÀASÉå: ¥À¤ì/«Ä±Àæ/44/2011-12, ¢£ÁAPÀ: 18-11-2011

2) ªÉÄîä£À« ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀ ºÁUÀÆ DgÀPÀëPÀ ªÀĺÁ ¤jÃPÀëPÀgÀÄ, PÉÃAzÀæ ªÀ®AiÀÄ, ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ, EªÀgÀ DzÉñÀ ¸ÀASÉå: C¦Ã®Ä/10/²PÉë/2012 (N.©.¸ÀASÉå: 0114/2012-13), ¢£ÁAPÀ: 08-11-2012

3) CfðzÁgÀgÀ ¥ÀjµÀÌgÀt ªÉÄîä£À« Cfð ¢£ÁAPÀ: 18-09-2013

4) ªÀĺÁ ¤zÉÃð±ÀPÀgÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ DgÀPÀëPÀ ªÀĺÁ ¤jÃPÀëPÀgÀÄ, ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ, EªÀgÀ ¥ÀvÀæ ¸ÀASÉå: C¦Ã®Ä(2)53/2013-14 ¢£ÁAPÀ: 09-01-2014

5) PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ÉÆÃPÀ ÉêÁ DAiÉÆÃUÀzÀ ¥ÀvÀæ ¸ÀASÉå: ¦J¸ï¹ 263 ¹J£ïJ¸ï 2013, ¢£ÁAPÀ: 18-10-2014

¥Àæ¸ÁÛªÀ£É:

²æà J¸ï.ªÉÊ. ªÉÆúÀ£ï, ¦J¸ïL, C§PÁj ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ¯Álj ¤µÉÃzsÀ zÀ¼À, PÉÆïÁgÀ f¯Éè, (E£ÀÄß ªÀÄÄAzÉ CfðzÁgÀgÉAzÀÄ PÀgÉAiÀÄ®àqÀĪÀ) EªÀgÀÄ F »AzÉ PÉÆïÁgÀ £ÀUÀgÀ ¥Éưøï oÁuÉ, PÉÆïÁgÀ E°è PÀvÀðªÀå ¤ªÀð»¸ÀÄwÛzÁÝUÀ PÀvÀðªÀåzÀ°è CwêÀ ¤®ðPÀëöåvÉ ºÁUÀÆ ÉÃdªÁ¨ÁÝjAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¥ÀæzÀ²ð¹zÀ PÁgÀtUÀ¼À ªÉÄÃ É EªÀjUÉ PÀ£ÁðlPÀ £ÁUÀjÃPÀ ¸ÉêÁ ¤AiÀĪÀÄ 106(J)gÀ£ÀéAiÀÄ PɼÀPÀAqÀAvÉ PÀvÀðªÀå ¥ÀjvÁåUÀ ¸ÀÆZÀ£Á ¥ÀvÀæªÀ£ÀÄß ºÉÆgÀr¹gÀÄvÁÛgÉ.

``¤ÃªÀÅ M§â dªÁ¨ÁÝjAiÀÄÄvÀ C¢üPÁjAiÀiÁVzÀÄÝ, ¢£ÁAPÀ: 02-08-2011jAzÀ ªÉÄïÁ¢üPÁjUÀ¼À C£ÀĪÀÄwAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¥ÀqÉAiÀÄzÉ gÀeÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ªÀÄAdÆgÀÄ ªÀiÁr¹PÉƼÀîzÉ PÀvÀðªÀåPÉÌ C£À¢üPÀÈvÀªÁV UÉÊgÀĺÁdgÁV PÀvÀðªÀåzÀ°è CwêÀ ¤®ðPÀëöåvÉ ºÁUÀÆ ÉÃdªÁ¨ÁÝjAiÀÄ£ÀÄß vÉÆÃ¥Àðr¹gÀÄwÛÃj. PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¥ÉÆ°Ã¸ï ªÀiÁå£ÀÄåAiÀÄ¯ï ªÁ®ÆåA 1gÀ ¤AiÀĪÀÄ 525gÀ ¥ÀæPÁgÀ UÉÊgÀĺÁdj CªÀ¢üAiÀÄÄ 21 ¢£ÀUÀ½UÀÆ ªÉÄîànÖzÀÄÝ, EzÀĪÀgÉ«UÀÆ UÉÊgÀĺÁdgÁVgÀĪÀÅzÀjAzÀ ¤ªÀÄä£ÀÄß ºÀAUÁ«ÄAiÀiÁV PÀvÀðªÀåªÀ£ÀÄß vÀåf¹¢gÉAzÀÄ ¥ÀjUÀt À ÁVzÉ.''

ªÉÄîÌAqÀ PÀvÀðªÀå ¥ÀjvÁåUÀ ¸ÀÆZÀ£Á ¥ÀvÀæPÉÌ D.¥ÉÆ.C.gÀªÀgÀÄ ¤ÃrgÀĪÀ ¸ÀªÀÄeÁ¬Ä¶AiÀÄ£ÀÄß M¥ÀàzÀ ²¸ÀÄÛ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀ ºÁUÀÆ ¥Éưøï C¢üÃPÀëPÀgÀÄ, aPÀ̧¼Áî¥ÀÄgÀ f Éè EªÀgÀÄ ªÉÄÃ É PÀæªÀÄ ¸ÀASÉå: (1)gÀ°è NzÀ¯ÁzÀ ¢£ÁAPÀ: 18-11-2011gÀ eÁÕ¥À£ÀzÀ°è ¸ÀzÀjAiÀĪÀgÀÄ ¢£ÁAPÀ: 08-08-2011jAzÀ ¢£ÁAPÀ: 31-10-2011gÀªÀgÉUÉ 85 ¢£ÀUÀ¼À PÁ® PÀvÀðªÀåPÉÌ UÉÊgÀÄ ºÁdgÁzÀ CªÀ¢üAiÀÄ£ÀÄß PÉ.¹.J¸ï. ¤AiÀĪÀÄ 106(J) ¥ÀæPÁgÀ ``¸ÀA§¼À gÀ»vÀ gÀeÉ'' JAzÀÄ ¥ÀjUÀt¹ DzÉò¹gÀÄvÁÛgÉ.

²¸ÀÄÛ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀzÀ DzÉñÀzÀ «gÀÄzÀÞ ¸À°è¹zÀ ªÉÄîä£À«AiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¥Àj²Ã°¹zÀ ªÉÄîä£À« ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀ ºÁUÀÆ DgÀPÀëPÀ ªÀĺÁ ¤jÃPÀëPÀgÀÄ, PÉÃAzÀæ ªÀ®AiÀÄ, ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ EªÀgÀÄ ªÉÄÃ É PÀæªÀÄ ¸ÀASÉå: (2)gÀ°è NzÀ ÁzÀ ¢£ÁAPÀ: 08-11-2012gÀ DzÉñÀzÀ°è ªÉÄîä£À«AiÀÄ£ÀÄß wgÀ ÀÌj¹gÀÄvÁÛgÉ.

F JgÀqÀÆ DzÉñÀzÀ «gÀÄzÀÞ ¸ÀPÁðgÀPÉÌ ¥ÀjµÀÌgÀt ªÉÄîä£À«AiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¸À°è¹gÀÄvÁÛgÉ. ¥ÀjµÀÌgÀt ªÉÄîä£À«AiÀÄ°è£À ªÁzÁA±ÀUÀ¼À£ÀÄß E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÉ zÁR ÉUÀ¼ÉÆA¢UÉ ¥Àj²Ã°¸À ÁVzÉ. ¥Àæ¸ÀÄÛvÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtzÀ°è CfðzÁgÀgÀÄ ¢£ÁAPÀ: 02-08-2011jAzÀ 08-08-2011gÀªÀgÉUÉ aAvÁªÀÄtÂAiÀÄ°è §AzÉÆç¸ïÛ PÀvÀðªÀå ¤ªÀð»¹, C£ÁgÉÆÃUÀåzÀ ¤«ÄvÀÛ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ aQvÉì ¥ÀqÉAiÀÄ®Ä ¥Éưøï C¢üÃPÀëPÀgÀÄ, r.L.J¸ï.¦. ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ¹.¦.L. EªÀgÀÄUÀ¼À ¥ÀƪÁð£ÀĪÀÄw ¥ÀqÉzÀÄ aQvÉìUÉ vÉgÀ½zÀÄÝ, £ÀAvÀgÀ D¸ÀàvÉæAiÀÄ°è DgÉÆÃUÀå sÁUÀå AiÉÆÃd£ÉAiÀÄr aQvÉìUÁV ¥Éưøï C¢üÃPÀëPÀgÀªÀjAzÀ zsÀÈrüÃPÀgÀt ¥ÀvÀæªÀ£ÀÄß ¥ÀqÉ¢gÀĪÀÅzÀÄ CªÀgÀÄ ¸À°è¹gÀĪÀ zÁR¯ÉUÀ½AzÀ PÀAqÀħgÀÄvÀÛzÉ. F »£Éß ÉAiÀÄ°è ²¸ÀÄÛ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀ «¢ü¹gÀĪÀ ²PÉëAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ªÀiÁ¥Àðr¸ÀĪÀ PÀÄjvÀAvÉ NzÀ ÁzÀ PÀæªÀĸÀASÉå: (5)gÀ ¥ÀvÀæzÀ°è PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ÉÆÃPÀ ÉêÁ DAiÉÆÃUÀzÀ ¸ÀºÀªÀÄwAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¥ÀqÉzÀÄ ¸ÀPÁðgÀªÀÅ F PɼÀPÀAqÀAvÉ DzÉò¹zÉ.

¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ DzÉñÀ ¸ÀASÉå: ME 32 ¥ÉƹC 2014, ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ, ¢£ÁAPÀ: 13-11-2014.

¥Àæ¸ÁÛªÀ£ÉAiÀÄ°è «ªÀj¹gÀĪÀ PÁgÀtUÀ¼À »£Éß ÉAiÀÄ°è, PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¥Éưøï C¢ü¤AiÀĪÀÄ 1963gÀ ¸ÉPÀë£ï 25gÀrAiÀÄ°è ¸ÀPÁðgÀPÉÌ ¥ÀæzÀvÀÛªÁzÀ C¢üPÁgÀªÀ£ÀÄß ZÀ Á¬Ä¹, ²æà J¸ï.ªÉÊ. ªÉÆúÀ£ï, ¦J¸ïL, C§PÁj ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ¯Álj ¤µÉÃzsÀ zÀ¼À, PÉÆïÁgÀ f Éè, EªÀgÀ ¥ÀjµÀÌgÀt ªÉÄîä£À«AiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¥ÀÄgÀ ÀÌj¹, ²¸ÀÄÛ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀªÀÅ EªÀjUÉ «¢ü¹gÀĪÀ ¢£ÁAPÀ: 08-08-2011jAzÀ 31-10-2011gÀªÀgÉV£À 85 ¢£ÀUÀ¼À ``¸ÀA§¼À gÀ»vÀ'' gÀeÉAiÀÄ zÀAqÀ£É DzÉñÀªÀ£ÀÄß ¥ÀjµÀÌj¹, ªÉÊzÀåQÃAiÀÄ PÁgÀtUÀ¼À ªÉÄÃ É CªÀgÀ ºÀQÌ£À°ègÀĪÀ gÀeÉ JAzÀÄ ¥ÀjUÀt¹ DzÉò¹zÉ.

P.R. 881

PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥Á®gÀ DzÉñÁ£ÀĸÁgÀ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ CªÀgÀ ºÉ Àj£À°è

eÉ.r. ªÀÄzsÀÄZÀAzÀæ vÉÃd¹é, ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ C¢üãÀ PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð,

M¼ÁqÀ½vÀ E¯ÁSÉ (¥ÉÆ°Ã¸ï ¸ÉêÉUÀ¼ÀÄ)

M¼ÁqÀ½vÀ ÀaªÁ®AiÀÄ

«µÀAiÀÄ : ²æà f. ¥ÀzÀä£Á sÀAiÀÄå, JºÉZï¹-38, rJDgï, PÉfJ¥sï, EªÀgÀ ¥ÀjµÀÌgÀt ªÉÄîä£À«AiÀÄ §UÉÎ CAwªÀÄ DzÉñÀ.

Page 34: ¨ÁUÀ 1 - KarPage-81-124).pdf · 22/01/2015  · (e) Shri E. Rama Murthy had submitted a revised sketch on 31/5/2002 reducing the area to an extent of 380 acres. It was found that

PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ, d£ÀªÀj 22, 2015 sÁUÀ 1 114

NzÀ¯ÁVzÉ : 1) ²¸ÀÄÛ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀ ºÁUÀÆ ¥Éưøï C¢üÃPÀëPÀgÀÄ, PÉÆïÁgÀ a£ÀßzÀUÀt ¥ÀæzÉñÀ, EªÀgÀ DzÉñÀ ¸ÀASÉå: ¹§âA¢(2)/rE/03/2012 (N.©. ¸ÀASÉå: 142/2013) ¢£ÁAPÀ: 18-06-2013

2) ªÉÄîä£À« ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀ ºÁUÀÆ DgÀPÀëPÀ ªÀĺÁ ¤jÃPÀëPÀgÀÄ, PÉÃAzÀæ ªÀ®AiÀÄ, ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ, EªÀgÀ DzÉñÀ ¸ÀASÉå: C¦Ã®Ä/50/²PÉë/2013 (N.©.¸ÀASÉå: 210/2013-14), ¢£ÁAPÀ: 25-03-2014

3) CfðzÁgÀgÀ ¥ÀjµÀÌgÀt ªÉÄîä£À« Cfð ¢£ÁAPÀ: 09-05-2014 4) ªÀĺÁ ¤zÉÃð±ÀPÀgÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ DgÀPÀëPÀ ªÀĺÁ ¤jÃPÀëPÀgÀÄ, ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ, EªÀgÀ ¥ÀvÀæ ¸ÀASÉå:

C¦Ã®Ä(2)20/2014-15, ¢£ÁAPÀ: 03-09-2014 ¥Àæ¸ÁÛªÀ£É:

²æà f. ¥ÀzÀä£Á sÀAiÀÄå, JºÉZï¹-38, (E£ÀÄß ªÀÄÄAzÉ CfðzÁgÀgÉAzÀÄ PÀgÉAiÀÄ®àqÀĪÀ EªÀgÀÄ) rJDgï, PÉfJ¥sï E°è PÀvÀðªÀå ¤ªÀð»¸ÀÄwÛzÁÝUÀ PÀvÀðªÀåzÀ°è C¢üPÁgÀ ªÁå¦Û «ÄÃjzÀ ºÀªÁå¸ÀUÀ¼À£ÀÄß gÀÆrü¹PÉÆAqÀÄ PÀvÀðªÀåzÀ°è zÀÄ£ÀðqÀvÉ ¥ÀæzÀ²ð¹zÀ PÁgÀtUÀ¼À ªÉÄÃ¯É EªÀgÀ «gÀÄzÀÞ PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå ¥Éưøï (²¸ÀÄÛ £ÀqÀªÀ½) ¤AiÀĪÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ 1965/89gÀ ¤AiÀĪÀÄ 6gÀr F PɼÀPÀAqÀAvÉ zÉÆõÀgÉÆÃ¥ÀuÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ºÉÆj¸À ÁVzÉ.

zÉÆõÁgÉÆÃ¥ÀuÉ :

``²æà f. ¥ÀzÀä£Á sÀAiÀÄå, JºÉZï¹-38, r.J.Dgï., PÉ.f.J¥sï., DzÀ ¤ÃªÀÅ ¢£ÁAPÀ: 25-09-2008jAzÀ ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ £ÀUÀgÀ ÉÆÃPÁAiÀÄÄPÀÛ ¥Éưøï oÁuÁ ªÉÆPÀzÀݪÉÄ ¸ÀASÉå: 08/2009gÀ°è DgÉÆæ 1 -

²æà ªÉÊ. ¸ÀA¥ÀAV, ±Á¸ÀPÀgÀÄ, EªÀjUÉ sÀzÀævÁ ¥ÉÆ°Ã¸ï ¹§âA¢AiÀiÁVAiÉÄà PÀvÀðªÀåzÀ°è ªÀÄÄAzÀĪÀgÉ¢zÀÄÝ, ¢£ÁAPÀ: 29-01-2009gÀAzÀÄ ÉÆÃPÁAiÀÄÄPÀÛ ¥ÉưøÀgÀÄ ²æà ªÉÊ. ¸ÀA¥ÀAV EªÀgÀ£ÀÄß zÁ½ ªÀiÁrzÁUÀ ÉÆÃPÁAiÀÄÄPÀÛ ¥Éưøï C¢üPÁjUÀ¼ÀÄ ¤ªÀÄUÉ UÀÄgÀÄvÀ£ÀÄß vÉÆÃj¸À°®èªÉAvÀ®Æ, CªÀgÀÄ ¸ÀªÀĪÀ ÀÛçzÀ°ègÀ°®èªÉAvÀ®Æ, DgÉÆævÀgÀ PÉÆoÀrAiÉƼÀUÉ ¥ÀæªÉò¸ÀĪÀ ªÉÆzÀ®Ä DgÉÆæ/±Á¸ÀPÀgÀ C£ÀĪÀÄwAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¥ÀqÉzÀÄPÉƼÀî®Ä ¤ªÀÄUÉ CªÀPÁ±À PÉÆqÀ°®èªÉAvÀ®Æ, DgÉÆævÀgÀ£ÀÄß ÉÆÃPÁAiÀÄÄPÀÛ C¢üPÁjUÀ¼ÀÄ PÀgÉzÉÆAiÀÄÄåªÁUÀ ¤ªÀÄUÉ ªÀiÁ»w PÉÆqÀ°®èªÉAvÀ ¤ÃªÀÅ ÉÆÃPÁAiÀÄÄPÀÛ C¢üPÁjUÀ¼À «gÀÄzÀÞ D¥ÁzÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ªÀiÁrgÀĪÀÅzÀÆ C®èzÉ DgÉÆæ/±Á¸ÀPÀgÀ£ÀÄß sÉÃn ªÀiÁqÀ®Ä §gÀĪÀ ¸ÀAzÀ±ÀðPÀgÀ £ÀqÀÄªÉ £ÀqÉAiÀÄĪÀ ¸ÀA sÁµÀuÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß D°¸ÀĪÀÅzÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ «ÃQë ÀĪÀÅzÀÄ vÀ£Àß ºÀªÁå¸ÀªÁVgÀÄvÀÛzÉAzÀÄ ¢£ÁAPÀ: 02-01-2012gÀAzÀÄ WÀ£À ¯ÉÆÃPÁAiÀÄÄPÀÛ £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄzÀ°è ¸ÁPÀëöå ¤ÃrzÁUÀ £ÀÄr¢zÀÄÝ, EzÀjAzÀ ¤ÃªÀÅ ¤ªÀÄä C¢üPÁgÀ ªÁå¦ÛUÉ «ÄÃjzÀ ºÀªÁå¸ÀUÀ¼À£ÀÄß gÀÆrü¹PÉÆAqÀÄ ¤ªÀÄä PÀvÀðªÀåzÀ°è zÀÄ£ÀðqÀvÉ vÉÆÃ¥Àðr¹ ÉÆÃ¥ÀªÉ ÀVgÀÄwÛÃj.''

E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÉAiÀÄ°è D.¥ÉÆ.C.gÀªÀgÀ ªÉÄð£À D¥ÁzÀ£ÉUÀ¼ÀÄ ¸Á©ÃvÁVzÉAiÉÄAzÀÄ «ZÁgÀuÁ¢üPÁjUÀ¼ÀÄ C©ü¥ÁæAiÀÄ ¤ÃrzÀÄÝ, CzÀgÀAvÉ D.¥ÉÆ.C.gÀªÀjUÉ PÁgÀt PÉüÀĪÀ £ÉÆÃnøï eÁj ªÀiÁr, D.¥ÉÆ.C.gÀªÀgÀÄ ¤ÃrzÀ ¸ÀªÀÄeÁ¬Ä¶AiÀÄ£ÀÄß M¥ÀàzÀ ²¸ÀÄÛ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀ ºÁUÀÆ ¥Éưøï C¢üÃPÀëPÀgÀÄ, PÉÆïÁgÀ a£ÀßzÀ UÀt ¥ÀæzÉñÀ, EªÀgÀÄ ªÉÄÃ É PÀæªÀÄ ¸ÀASÉå: (1)gÀ°è NzÀ ÁzÀ ¢£ÁAPÀ: 18-06-2013gÀ DzÉñÀzÀ°è CfðzÁgÀgÀ ªÉÃvÀ£ÀªÀ£ÀÄß vÀPÀët¢AzÀ eÁjUÉ §gÀĪÀAvÉ ¥ÉÆ°Ã¸ï ºÉqï PÁ£ïìmÉç¯ï ºÀÄzÉÝAiÀÄ PÀ¤µÀ× ªÉÃvÀ£À gÀÆ. 12,500/-UÀ½UÉ ªÀÄÆgÀÄ ªÀµÀðUÀ¼À PÁ® ªÀÄÄA¢£À ªÉÃvÀ£À §rÛUÀ½UÉ zsÀPÉÌAiÀiÁUÀĪÀAvÉ E½¹, ¸ÀzÀjAiÀĪÀgÀÄ ªÀÄÆgÀÄ ªÀµÀðUÀ¼À vÀgÀĪÁAiÀÄ ºÉƸÀzÁV ªÁ¶ðPÀ ªÉÃvÀ£À §rÛUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¸ÀA¥Á¢¹PÉƼÀî®Ä CºÀðgÁVgÀÄvÁÛgÉAzÀÄ ºÁUÀÆ ¸ÀzÀjAiÀĪÀgÀÄ CªÀiÁ£ÀwÛ£À°è PÀ¼ÉzÀ CªÀ¢ü ¢£ÁAPÀ: 08-07-2012jAzÀ ¢£ÁAPÀ: 13-08-2012gÀªÀgÉV£À 37 ¢£ÀUÀ¼À£ÀÄß CªÀiÁ£ÀvÉÛAzÀÄ ¥ÀjUÀt¹ DzÉò¹gÀÄvÁÛgÉ.

²¸ÀÄÛ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀzÀ DzÉñÀzÀ «gÀÄzÀÞ ¸À°è¹zÀ ªÉÄîä£À«AiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¥Àj²Ã°zÀ ªÉÄîä£À« ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀ ºÁUÀÆ DgÀPÀëPÀ ªÀĺÁ ¤jÃPÀëPÀgÀÄ, PÉÃAzÀæ ªÀ®AiÀÄ, ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ EªÀgÀÄ ªÉÄÃ É PÀæªÀÄ ¸ÀASÉå: (2)gÀ°è NzÀ ÁzÀ ¢£ÁAPÀ: 25-03-2014gÀ DzÉñÀzÀ°è CfðzÁgÀgÀ ªÉÄîä£À«AiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¥ÀÄgÀ ÀÌj¹, CfðzÁgÀgÀ ªÉÃvÀ£ÀªÀ£ÀÄß vÀPÀët¢AzÀ eÁjUÉ §gÀĪÀAvÉ ¥ÉÆ°Ã¸ï ºÉqï PÁ£ïìmÉç¯ï ºÀÄzÉÝAiÀÄ PÀ¤µÀ× ªÉÃvÀ£À gÀÆ. 12,500/-UÀ½UÉ ªÀÄÆgÀÄ ªÀµÀðUÀ¼À PÁ® ªÀÄÄA¢£À ªÉÃvÀ£À §rÛUÀ½UÉ zsÀPÉÌAiÀiÁUÀĪÀAvÉ E½¹gÀĪÀ ²¸ÀÄÛ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀzÀ zÀAqÀ£ÁzÉñÀªÀ£ÀÄß ªÀiÁ¥Àðr¹, ªÀÄÄA¢£À ªÉÃvÀ£À §rÛUÀ½UÉ zsÀPÉÌAiÀiÁUÀzÀAvÉ sÁUÀ±ÀB ªÀiÁ¥Àðr¹, G½zÀ zÀAqÀ£ÉUÀ¼ÀÄ AiÀÄxÁªÀvÁÛVgÀÄvÀÛªÉ JAzÀÄ DzÉò¹gÀÄvÁÛgÉ.

F JgÀqÀÆ DzÉñÀUÀ¼À «gÀÄzÀÞ CfðzÁgÀgÀÄ ¸ÀPÁðgÀPÉÌ ¥ÀjµÀÌgÀt ªÉÄîä£À«AiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¸À°è¹gÀÄvÁÛgÉ. ¥ÀjµÀÌgÀt ªÉÄîä£À«AiÀÄ°è£À ªÁzÁA±ÀUÀ¼À£ÀÄß E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÁ zÁR ÉUÀ¼ÉÆA¢UÉ ¥Àj²Ã°¸À¯ÁVzÉ. ¥Àæ¸ÀÄÛvÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtzÀ°è CfðzÁgÀgÀ ªÉÄÃ É ºÉÆj¹zÀ DgÉÆÃ¥ÀUÀ¼ÀÄ UÀÄgÀÄvÀgÀªÁVzÀÄÝ, FUÁUÀ Éà ªÉÄîä£À« ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀªÀÅ ²¸ÀÄÛ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀzÀ DzÉñÀªÀ£ÀÄß ªÀiÁ¥Àðr¹zÀÄÝ, ºÁUÀÆ ¥ÀjµÀÌgÀt ªÉÄîä£À«AiÀÄ°è ¥ÀjUÀt À§ºÀÄzÁzÀ ºÉaÑ£À ¸ÀAUÀwUÀ¼ÀÄ E®è¢gÀĪÀ »£Éß ÉAiÀÄ°è ¸ÀPÁðgÀªÀÅ F PɼÀPÀAqÀAvÉ DzÉò¹zÉ.

¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ DzÉñÀ ¸ÀASÉå: ME 77 ¥ÉƹC 2014, ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ, ¢£ÁAPÀ: 21-11-2014. ¥Àæ¸ÁÛªÀ£ÉAiÀÄ°è «ªÀj¹gÀĪÀ PÁgÀtUÀ¼À »£Éß ÉAiÀÄ°è, PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¥Éưøï C¢ü¤AiÀĪÀÄ 1963gÀ ¸ÉPÀë£ï 25gÀrAiÀÄ°è ¸ÀPÁðgÀPÉÌ

¥ÀæzÀvÀÛªÁzÀ C¢üPÁgÀªÀ£ÀÄß ZÀ¯Á¬Ä¹, ²æà f. ¥ÀzÀä£Á sÀAiÀÄå, JºÉZï¹-38, rJDgï, PÉfJ¥sï EªÀgÀÄ ¸ÀPÁðgÀPÉÌ ¸À°è¹zÀ ¥ÀjµÀÌgÀt ªÉÄîä£À«AiÀÄ£ÀÄß wgÀ ÀÌj¸À ÁVzÉ.

P.R. 882

PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥Á®gÀ DzÉñÁ£ÀĸÁgÀ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ CªÀgÀ ºÉ Àj£À°è eÉ.r. ªÀÄzsÀÄZÀAzÀæ vÉÃd¹é,

¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ C¢üãÀ PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð, M¼ÁqÀ½vÀ E¯ÁSÉ (¥ÉÆ°Ã¸ï ¸ÉêÉUÀ¼ÀÄ)

Page 35: ¨ÁUÀ 1 - KarPage-81-124).pdf · 22/01/2015  · (e) Shri E. Rama Murthy had submitted a revised sketch on 31/5/2002 reducing the area to an extent of 380 acres. It was found that

sÁUÀ 1 PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ, d£ÀªÀj 22, 2015 115

¥ÀæªÁ ÉÆÃzÀåªÀÄ ÀaªÁ®AiÀÄ «µÀAiÀÄ: PÁ¥ÉÆðgÉÃmï ¸ÁªÀiÁfPÀ ¸ÀºÀ sÁVvÀézÀrAiÀÄ°è “¥ÀæªÁ¹ vÁtUÀ¼ÀÄ/¸ÀPÀÆåðmïì zÀvÀÄÛ

vÉUÉzÀÄPÉƼÀÄîªÀ PÁAiÀÄðPÀæªÀÄ” ªÀ£ÀÄß ¥ÁægÀA©ü¸À®Ä ªÀÄAdÆgÁw.

NzÀ¯ÁVzÉ: ¥ÀæªÁ¸ÉÆÃzÀåªÀÄ ¤zÉÃð±ÀPÀgÀ PÀqÀvÀ ¸ÀASÉå: ¥ÀæE/AiÉÆÃ-2/226/2013-14.

¥Àæ¸ÁÛªÀ£É :

2014-15£Éà DAiÀĪÀåAiÀÄ sÁµÀtzÀ°è ªÀiÁ£Àå ªÀÄÄRåªÀÄAwæUÀ¼ÀÄ PÁ¥ÉÆðgÉÃmï ¸ÁªÀiÁfPÀ ¸ÀºÀ sÁVvÀézÀrAiÀÄ°è ¥ÀæªÁ¹ vÁt/¸ÀPÀÆåðmïìUÀ¼À zÀvÀÄÛ vÉUÉzÀÄPÉƼÀÄîªÀ PÁAiÀÄðPÀæªÀĪÀ£ÀÄß ¥ÁægÀA©ü¸À¯ÁUÀĪÀÅzÉAzÀÄ WÉÆö¹gÀÄvÁÛgÉ.

2. sÁgÀvÀ ¸ÀPÁðgÀªÀÅ “¨sÁgÀvÀ ÀéZÀÒvÁ C©üAiÀiÁ£À’’ PÁAiÀÄðPÀæªÀĪÀ£ÀÄß ºÀ«ÄäPÉÆArgÀĪÀÅzÀ®èzÉà “Cwy zÉêÉÇèsÀªÀ” JA§ ºÉ Àj£À°è ¸ÁªÀiÁfPÀ eÁUÀævÉ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ªÀiÁzÀåªÀÄ DAzÉÆî£À PÉÊUÉƼÀî¯ÁVzÉ. ªÀÄzsÀå¸ÀÜUÁgÀgÀ eÉÆvÉUÉ sÁgÀvÀ ¸ÀPÁðgÀªÀÅ ¸ÀgÀt ¸À sÉ £ÀqɹzÀ £ÀAvÀgÀ F DAzÉÆî£ÀPÉÌ SÁ¸ÀV ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ¸ÁªÀðd¤PÀ ¸ÀAWÀ ¸ÀA¸ÉÜUÀ¼À£ÀÄß M¼ÀUÉÆAqÀÄ ¤ªÀð»¸ÀÄwÛzÉ. CzÀgÀ£ÀéAiÀÄ sÁgÀvÀ ¸ÀéZÀÒvÁ C©üAiÀiÁ£À AiÉÆÃd£ÉAiÀÄr ¥ÁæAiÉÆÃVPÀªÁV £ÀªÀzɺÀ°AiÀÄ PÀÄvÀÄ¨ï «Ä£Ágï ¥ÀæzÉñÀªÀ£ÀÄß sÁgÀvÀ ¥ÀæªÁ¸ÉÆÃzÀåªÀÄ C©üªÀÈ¢Ý ¤UÀªÀĪÀÅ zÀvÀÄÛ ¥ÀqÉ¢gÀÄvÀÛzÉ. CzÉà jÃw ¥ÀæªÀÄÄR ¸ÁägÀPÀUÀ¼ÀÄ CAzÀgÉ DUÁæzÀ°ègÀĪÀ vÁeïªÀĺÀ ï, ªÀĺÁgÁµÀÖçzÀ J ÉÆèÃgÁ UÀĺÉUÀ¼ÀÄ, D£ÉUÀĺÉUÀ¼ÀÄ, zɺÀ°AiÀÄ PÉA¥ÀÄPÉÆÃmÉ, ºÉÊzÀgÁ¨Á¢£À ªÀĺÁ§°¥ÀÄgÀA£À°ègÀĪÀ UÉÆïïPÉÆAqÁ PÉÆÃmÉ EvÁå¢UÀ¼À£ÀÄß zÀvÀÄÛ vÉUÉzÀÄPÉƼÀî®Ä N.J£ï.f.¹ EZÉÒ ªÀåPÀÛ¥Àr¹gÀĪÀÅzÁV ¥ÀæªÁ¸ÉÆÃzÀåªÀÄ ¤zÉÃð±ÀPÀgÀÄ ªÀgÀ¢ ªÀiÁrgÀÄvÁÛgÉ. .

3. PÀ£ÁðlPÀªÀ£ÀÄß “MAzÀÄ gÁdå ºÀ®ªÀÅ dUÀvÀÄÛUÀ¼ÀÄ” JAzÀÄ ¸ÀªÀÄAd¸ÀªÁV PÀgÉAiÀįÁUÀÄvÀÛzÉ. E°è AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉà ¥ÀæªÁ¹UÀjUÉ ¥ÀgÀA¥ÀgÉ, PÀqÀ®wÃgÀUÀ¼ÀÄ, ¸ÁºÀ À, CgÀtå fêÀ£À, ¥ÀæªÁ¸ÉÆÃzÀåªÀÄ ¤ÃqÀĪÀ KPÉÊPÀ gÁdåªÁVzÉ. C®èzÉ, ºÀA¦ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ¥ÀlÖzÀPÀ®Äè JgÀqÀÄ «±Àé ¥ÀgÀA¥ÀgÉAiÀÄ vÁtUÀ½gÀĪÀ £É ÉAiÀiÁVzÉ. ¥ÀæªÁ¸ÉÆÃzÀåªÀÄ ªÀÄÆ®¸ËPÀAiÀÄð, ¥ÀæZÁgÀ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ¥ÀæªÁ¹ vÁt ¥ÀæZÁgÀ PÉÊUÉƼÀî®Ä ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ¥ÀæªÁ¸ÉÆÃzÀåªÀÄ ªÀ®AiÀÄzÀ°è SÁ¸ÀV ºÀÆrPÉ ¥ÉÆæÃvÁ컸ÀĪÀ GzÉÝñÀ ºÉÆA¢zÉ. E¯ÁSÉ gÁeÁåzÀåAvÀ ¸ÀĪÀiÁgÀÄ 319 ¥ÀæªÁ¹ vÁtUÀ¼À£ÀÄß UÀÄgÀÄw¹zÉ. DzÀgÉ, F ¥ÀæªÁ¹ vÁt/¸ÀPÀÆåðmïìUÀ¼ÀÄ sÁgÀvÀ ¥ÀÄgÁvÀvÀé, gÁdåzÀ ¥ÀÄgÁvÀvÀé, vÉÆÃlUÁjPÉ, d®¸ÀA¥À£ÀÆä®, ªÀÄÄdgÁ¬Ä ¸ÀA¸ÉÜUÀ¼ÀÄ, CgÀªÀÄ£É ªÀÄAqÀ½ ªÀÄÄAvÁzÀªÀÅUÀ¼À ªÁå¦ÛUÉ M¼À¥ÀqÀĪÀÅzÀjAzÀ EªÀÅUÀ¼À C©üªÀÈ¢Þ PÁAiÀÄðUÀ¼À£ÀÄß PÉÊUÉƼÀÄîªÀ°è ¥ÀæªÁ¸ÉÆÃzÀåªÀÄ E¯ÁSÉ §ºÀ¼ÀµÀÄÖ ¸ÀªÁ®ÄUÀ¼À£ÀÄß JzÀÄj¸ÀÄwÛzÉ.

4. PÀ£ÁðlPÀzÀ°è ¥ÀæªÁ¹UÀjUÉ GvÀÛªÀÄ C£ÀÄ sÀªÀ ºÉÆAzÀĪÀAvÁUÀ®Ä ¥ÀæªÁ¹ vÁtUÀ¼À°è/¸ÀPÀÆåðmïìUÀ¼À°è ªÀÄÆ®¸ËPÀAiÀÄð, ¥sÀ®PÀUÀ¼ÀÄ, ªÁåSÁå£À PÉÃAzÀæUÀ¼ÀÄ, ¥ÀæªÁ¹ ¸Éßû ªÁºÀ£ÀUÀ¼ÀÄ, ¸ÀÆPÀÛ ªÀiÁUÀðzÀ²ðUÀ¼ÀÄ EvÁå¢ ¸Ë® sÀåUÀ¼À£ÀÄß MzÀV¸À ÉÃPÁVgÀÄvÀÛzÉ. ¥ÁægÀA©üPÀªÁV E¯ÁSÉ 46 vÁt/¸ÀPÀÆåðmïìUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¸ÁªÀiÁfPÀ ¸ÀºÀ sÁVvÀézÀ°è zÀvÀÄÛ ¤ÃqÀĪÀ AiÉÆÃd£ÉUÉ UÀÄgÀÄw¹zÉ. ¸ÀzÀj ¥ÀnÖAiÀÄÄ «ªÀgÀuÁvÀäPÀªÁVzÀÄÝ, PÁ¥ÉÆðgÉÃmï/¸ÁªÀðd¤PÀ G¢ÝªÉÄUÀ¼ÀÄ/¸ÀA¸ÉÜUÀ¼ÀÄ zÀvÀÄÛ vÉUÉzÀÄPÉƼÀÄîªÀ AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉà vÁtUÀ¼À §UÉÎ ¸À®ºÉ ¤ÃqÀ§ºÀÄzÁVgÀÄvÀÛzÉ. ¥ÀæªÁ¹ vÁt/¸ÀPÀÆåðmïìUÀ¼À ¥ÀnÖAiÀÄ£ÀÄß C£ÀħAzsÀ-1gÀ°è ¤ÃqÀ ÁVzÉ.

5. PÁ¥ÉÆðgÉÃmï/¸ÁªÀðd¤PÀ G¢ÝªÉÄUÀ¼ÀÄ/¸ÀA¸ÉÜUÀ¼ÀÄ zÀvÀÄÛ vÉUÉzÀÄPÉƼÀÄîªÀ §UÉÎ ¸À°è ÀĪÀ ¥Àæ¸ÁÛªÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß PɼÀPÀAqÀAvÉ ¥Àj²Ã°¹ C£ÀĪÉÆÃzÀ£É ¤ÃqÀĪÀ ¸À®ÄªÁV MAzÀÄ ¸À«ÄwAiÀÄ£ÀÄß gÀa¸ÀĪÀAvÉ ¥ÀæªÁ¸ÉÆÃzÀåªÀÄ ¤zÉÃð±ÀPÀgÀÄ PÉÆÃjgÀÄvÁÛgÉ.

a. zÀvÀÄÛ vÉUÉzÀÄPÉƼÀÄîªÀ PÁ¥ÉÆðgÉÃmï WÀlPÀ/¸ÁªÀðd¤PÀ G¢ÝªÉÄUÀ¼ÀÄ CªÀgÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ PÉÊUÉƼÀÄîªÀ ZÀlĪÀnPÉUÀ¼ÀÄ, ¸ÁzsÀåvÉ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ DAiÀĪÀåAiÀÄ ªÀiÁ»wAiÀÄ£ÉÆß¼ÀUÉÆAqÀAvÉ ¸À°è ÀĪÀ ¥Àæ¸ÁÛªÀ£ÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¸À«ÄwAiÀÄÄ C£ÀĪÉÆâ¸ÀvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ.

b. ««zsÀ CxÁjnUÀ¼À C£ÀĪÉÆÃzÀ£É CªÀ±Àå«gÀĪÀÅzÀ£ÀÄß RavÀ¥Àr¹PÉÆAqÀÄ CzÀ£ÀÄß ¥ÀqÉAiÀÄ®Ä ¸À«ÄwAiÀÄÄ PÁ®-UÀqÀĪÀ£ÀÄß ¤UÀ¢ü¥Àr¸ÀvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ.

c. C£ÀħAzsÀ-1gÀ°è £ÀªÀÄÆ¢¹gÀĪÀ 46 vÁtUÀ¼À eÉÆvÉUÉ ÉÃgÉ ¥ÀæªÁ¹ vÁtUÀ¼À£ÀÄß zÀvÀÄÛ PÁAiÀÄðPÀæªÀÄPÉÌ ¸À«ÄwAiÀÄÄ UÀÄgÀÄw¸À§ºÀÄzÀÄ.

d. ¥ÀæªÁ¹ vÁtPÉÌ ¸ÀÆPÀÛ ¸Ë® sÀå ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ªÀÄÆ® ¸ËPÀAiÀÄðUÀ¼À£ÀÄß MzÀV¸ÀĪÀ EvÀgÉ «µÀAiÀÄUÀ¼À ªÉÄÃ É ¸À«ÄwAiÀÄÄ ZÀað¹ ¤zsÁðgÀªÀ£ÀÄß PÉÊUÉƼÀÀÄzÀÄ.

6. F PÁAiÀÄðPÀæªÀÄzÀr PÁ¥ÉÆðgÉÃmï ¸ÀA¸ÉÜUÀ¼ÀÄ PÁAiÀiÁðZÀgÀuÉ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ¤ªÀðºÀuÉ ZÀlĪÀnPÉUÀ½UÉ ºÀtPÁ¸ÀÄ ªÉZÀѪÀ£ÀÄß CAvÀºÀ ¸ÀA¸ÉÜUÀ¼Éà ¤ªÀð»¸À ÉÃPÉà ºÉÆgÀvÀÄ C£ÀÄzÁ£ÀªÀ£ÀÄß AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉà ¸ÀPÁðj ¸ÀA¸ÉÜ/E¯ÁSÉUÉ ªÀUÁð¬Ä¸ÀvÀPÀÌzÀÝ®è ºÁUÀÆ ¸ÀzÀj PÁAiÀÄðPÀæªÀÄzÀr ¥ÀæªÁ¹ vÁtªÀ£ÀÄß zÀvÀÄÛ vÉUÉzÀÄPÉÆAqÀÄ C©üªÀÈ¢Þ¥Àr¹ 5 ªÀµÀðUÀ¼ÀªÀgÉUÉ ¤ªÀðºÀuÉ ªÀiÁqÀĪÀ ¸ÀA§AzsÀ CªÀ±Àå C£ÀÄzÁ£À MzÀV¸ÀĪÀ PÀÄjvÀÄ RavÀ¥Àr¹PÉƼÀÄîªÀÅzÀÄ.

7. zÀvÀÄÛ PÁAiÀÄðPÀæªÀÄzÀ AiÉÆÃd£ÉAiÀÄ CªÀ¢ü £ÉÆÃqÀ ï E¯ÁSÉ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ¥ÀæªÁ¸ÉÆÃzÀåªÀÄ E¯ÁSÉ zÀvÀÄÛ PÁAiÀÄðPÀæªÀÄzÀ ¸ÀA§AzsÀ MOU ¸À» ªÀiÁrzÀ ¢£À¢AzÀ 5 ªÀµÀðUÀ¼ÀªÀgÉUÉ EgÀÄvÀÛzÉ. ¥ÀgÀ ÀàgÀ M¦àUÉAiÀiÁzÀ°è ªÀÄÄA¢£À 5 ªÀµÀðUÀ¼ÀªÀgÉUÉ £À«ÃPÀj¸À§ºÀÄzÀÄ. ¤AiÀÄvÀPÁ°PÀªÁV zÀvÀÄÛ ¥ÀqÉzÀ AiÉÆÃd£ÉAiÀÄ ¥ÀæwAiÉÆAzÀÄ PÁAiÀÄðPÀæªÀÄzÀ C£ÀĵÁ×£ÀzÀ PÀÄjvÀÄ ªÀiË®åªÀiÁ¥À£ÀªÀ£ÀÄß ¥ÀæªÁ¸ÉÆÃzÀåªÀÄ E¯ÁSÉ £ÉëĸÀĪÀ ¸ÀévÀAvÀæ ªÀiË®åªÀiÁ¥ÀPÀgÀÄ ªÀiÁqÀÄvÁÛgÉ.

8. Erà zÀvÀÄÛ PÁAiÀÄðPÀæªÀÄzÀ ªÉÄðéZÁgÀuÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¥ÀæªÁ¸ÉÆÃzÀåªÀÄ E¯ÁSÉAiÀÄ dAn ¤zÉÃð±ÀPÀgÀÄ [¦.JA.AiÀÄÄ] £ÉÆÃqÀ ï C¢üPÁjAiÀiÁV ¤ªÀð»¸ÀĪÀÅzÀÄ. AiÀiÁªÀ ¥ÀæªÁ¹ vÁt ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ¸ÁägÀPÀUÀ¼ÀÄ sÁgÀwÃAiÀÄ ¥ÀÄgÁvÀvÀé ¸ÀªÉÃðPÀëuÉUÉ M¼À¥ÀnÖzÀÝ°è CzÀgÀ CxÀªÁ ¸ÀA§A¢ü¹zÀ ¤AiÀÄAvÀæPÀgÀ C£ÀĪÉÆÃzÀ£ÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¥ÀæªÁ¸ÉÆÃzÀåªÀÄ E¯ÁSÉAiÀÄ dAn ¥ÀæAiÀÄvÀßzÉÆA¢UÉ ¥ÀqÉAiÀÄĪÀÅzÀÄ.

9. ªÉÄð£ÀAvÉ, PÁ¥ÉÆðgÉÃmï ¸ÁªÀiÁfPÀ ¸ÀºÀ sÁVvÀézÀrAiÀÄ°è C£ÀħAzsÀ-1gÀ°è £ÀªÀÄÆ¢¹gÀĪÀ 46 ¥ÀæªÁ¹ vÁtUÀ¼À/¸ÀPÀÆåðmïìUÀ¼À zÀvÀÄÛ vÉUÉzÀÄPÉƼÀÄîªÀ PÁAiÀÄðPÀæªÀÄ ¥ÁægÀA©ü¸À®Ä ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ C£ÀĪÉÆÃzÀ£ÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¥ÀæªÁ¸ÉÆÃzÀåªÀÄ ¤zÉÃð±ÀPÀgÀÄ PÉÆÃjgÀÄvÁÛgÉ.

¸ÀPÁðgÀªÀÅ ¥Àæ¸ÁÛªÀ£ÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß PÀÆ®APÀµÀªÁV ¥Àj²Ã°¹zÀ £ÀAvÀgÀ PɼÀPÀAqÀAvÉ DzÉò¹zÉ.

Page 36: ¨ÁUÀ 1 - KarPage-81-124).pdf · 22/01/2015  · (e) Shri E. Rama Murthy had submitted a revised sketch on 31/5/2002 reducing the area to an extent of 380 acres. It was found that

116 PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ, d£ÀªÀj 22, 2015 sÁUÀ 1

ÀPÁðgÀzÀ DzÉñÀ ÀASÉå: ¥ÀæE 98 ¥ÀæªÁAiÉÆà 2014, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ, ¢£ÁAPÀ: 16£Éà ɥÉÖA§gï 2014.

ªÉÄÃ É «ªÀj¹gÀĪÀ ¸À¤ßªÉñÀUÀ¼À »£Éß ÉAiÀÄ°è, C£ÀħAzsÀ-1gÀ°è UÀÄgÀÄw¹gÀĪÀ 46 ¥ÀæªÁ¹ vÁt/¸ÀPÀÆåðmïì CxÀªÁ CzÀgÀ sÁUÀUÀ¼À£ÀÄß C£ÀÄPÀæªÀĪÁV C£ÀħAzsÀ-2 ªÀÄvÀÄÛ 3gÀ°è ¤UÀ¢¥Àr¹gÀĪÀ zÀvÀÄÛ PÁAiÀÄðPÀæªÀÄzÀ G¥ÀPÀæªÀÄUÀ¼À/ZÀlĪÀnPÉUÀ¼À£ÀéAiÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ PÁAiÀÄðPÀæªÀÄ

C¼ÀªÀr¹PÉƼÀÄîªÀ AiÀiÁAwæPÀ ªÀåªÀ ÉÜAiÀÄ£ÀéAiÀÄ PÁ¥ÉÆðgÉÃmï ¸ÁªÀiÁfPÀ ¸ÀºÀ sÁVvÀézÀrAiÀÄ°è F PɼÀPÀAqÀ ¤§AzsÀ£ÉUÀ¼ÉÆA¢UÉ zÀvÀÄÛ ¤ÃqÀ®Ä ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ C£ÀĪÉÆÃzÀ£É ¤ÃqÀ ÁVzÉ.

1) zÀvÀÄÛ PÁAiÀÄðPÀæªÀĪÀÅ C£ÀħAzsÀ-2gÀ°è ¤ÃrgÀĪÀAvÉ ¥ÀæªÁ¹ ¸Ë® sÀå EvÁå¢UÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¸ÀÈf¸ÀĪÀÅzÀgÉÆA¢UÉ CªÀÅUÀ¼À ¤ªÀðºÀuÉ ªÀiÁqÀĪÀ ¥ÀæAiÀÄvÀߪÁVgÀ ÉÃPÀÄ.

2) zÀvÀÄÛ PÁAiÀÄðPÀæªÀÄzÀ AiÉÆÃd£ÉAiÀÄ 5 ªÀµÀðUÀ¼À CªÀ¢üUÉ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ªÀÄÄA¢£À 5 ªÀµÀðUÀ¼ÀªÀgÉUÉ £À«ÃPÀj¸À®Ä. 3) zÀvÀÄÛ PÁAiÀÄðPÀæªÀÄzÀr PÁ¥ÉÆðgÉÃmï ¸ÀA¸ÉÜUÀ¼ÀÄ AiÉÆÃd£ÉAiÀÄ C£ÀĵÁ×£À ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ¤ªÀðºÀuÉ ¸ÀA§AzsÀ ¥ÀævÉåÃPÀªÁV C£ÀÄzÁ£À

¤UÀ¢¥Àr¹PÉÆAqÀÄ ¸ÀzÀj PÁAiÀÄðPÀæªÀÄzÀ DyðPÀ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ sËwPÀ ¥ÀæUÀwAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¥ÀæªÁ¸ÉÆÃzÀåªÀÄ ¤zÉÃð±ÀPÀjUÉ ªÀgÀ¢ ªÀiÁqÀĪÀÅzÀÄ.

¥Àæ¸ÁÛªÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¥Àj²Ã®£ÉªÀiÁr C£ÀĪÉÆÃzÀ£É ¤ÃqÀĪÀ ¸ÀA§AzsÀ ¸ÀPÁðgÀªÀÅ PɼÀPÀAqÀ ¸ÀzÀ ÀågÀ£ÉÆß¼ÀUÉÆAqÀ AiÉÆÃd£Á C£ÀĵÁ×£À ¸À«ÄwAiÀÄ£ÀÄß gÀa¹zÉ:

1. ¥ÀæªÁ¸ÉÆÃzÀåªÀÄ ¸ÀaªÀgÀÄ - CzsÀåPÀëgÀÄ

2. ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ C¥ÀgÀ ªÀÄÄRå PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð, ¥ÀæªÁ¸ÉÆÃzÀåªÀÄ E¯ÁSÉ. - ¸ÀzÀ ÀågÀÄ

3. ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ C¥ÀgÀ ªÀÄÄRå PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð, ªÁtÂdå ªÀÄvÀÄÛ PÉÊUÁjPÁ E¯ÁSÉ. - ¸ÀzÀ ÀågÀÄ

4. ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ C¥ÀgÀ ªÀÄÄRå PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð, CgÀtå, ¥Àj¸ÀgÀ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ fë±Á¸ÀÛç E¯ÁSÉ. - ¸ÀzÀ ÀågÀÄ

5. ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ ¥ÀæzsÁ£À PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð, DyðPÀ E¯ÁSÉ. - ¸ÀzÀ ÀågÀÄ

6. ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ ¥ÀæzsÁ£À PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð, PÀ£ÀßqÀ, ¸ÀA¸ÀÌøw ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ªÁvÁð E¯ÁSÉ. - ¸ÀzÀ ÀågÀÄ

7. ¤zÉÃð±ÀPÀgÀÄ, sÁgÀwÃAiÀÄ ¸ÀªÉÃðPÀëuÁ E¯ÁSÉ, sÁgÀvÀ ¸ÀPÁðgÀ. - ¸ÀzÀ ÀågÀÄ

8. ¥ÀæzsÁ£À ªÀÄÄRå CgÀtå ¸ÀAgÀPÀëuÁ¢üPÁj, CgÀtå E¯ÁSÉ. - ¸ÀzÀ ÀågÀÄ

9. ¤zÉÃð±ÀPÀgÀÄ, ªÁtÂdå ªÀÄvÀÄÛ PÉÊUÁjPÁ E¯ÁSÉ. - ¸ÀzÀ ÀågÀÄ

10. ¤zÉÃð±ÀPÀgÀÄ, PÀ£ÀßqÀ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ¸ÀA¸ÀÌøw E¯ÁSÉ. - ¸ÀzÀ ÀågÀÄ

11. DAiÀÄÄPÀÛgÀÄ, ¥ÁæZÀåªÀ ÀÄÛ ¸ÀAUÀæºÁ®AiÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ¥ÀgÀA¥ÀgÉ E¯ÁSÉ. - ¸ÀzÀ ÀågÀÄ

12. DºÁé¤vÀgÀÄ - ¸À«ÄwAiÀÄ EZÉÒUÀ£ÀĸÁgÀ. - ¸ÀzÀ ÀågÀÄ

13. ¤zÉÃð±ÀPÀgÀÄ, ¥ÀæªÁ¸ÉÆÃzÀåªÀÄ E¯ÁSÉ. - ¸ÀAZÁ®PÀgÀÄ

ªÉÄîÌAqÀ À«ÄwAiÀÄ£ÀÄß -

J) PÁ¥ÉÆðgÉÃmï WÀlPÀUÀ½AzÀ ¹éÃPÀÈvÀUÉÆAqÀ ¥Àæ¸ÁÛªÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß C£ÀĪÉÆâ¸À®Ä;

©) CªÀ±Àå«zÀÝ°è, EvÀgÉ AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉà ¥ÀæªÁ¹ vÁtUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¸ÉÃj¸À®Ä;

¹) AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉà EvÀgÉ CxÁjnUÀ¼À ¸ÀªÀÄäw/C£ÀĪÀÄw ¥ÀqÉAiÀÄĪÀ CUÀvÀåvÉ §UÉÎ RavÀ¥Àr¹PÉƼÀî®Ä ªÀÄvÀÄÛ PÉÆÃgÀ®Ä;

r) AiÉÆÃd£ÉAiÀÄ C£ÀĪÉÆÃzÀ£ÉUÉ ¸ÀºÀªÀÄw CxÀªÁ ¥ÀjtÂw CªÀ±Àå«gÀĪÀ C£ÀĨsÀ«UÀ¼À ¸ÀzÀ ÀågÀÄUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ºÀÆrPÉzÁgÀgÀ PÉÆÃ-D¥ïÖ ªÀiÁrPÉƼÀî®Ä;

E) AiÉÆÃd£ÉAiÀÄ C£ÀĵÁ×£ÀzÀ »vÀzÀȶ֬ÄAzÀ EvÀgÉ AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉà wêÀiÁð£ÀUÀ¼À£ÀÄß PÉÊUÉƼÀî®Ä gÀa¸À ÁVzÉ.

PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥Á®gÀ DzÉñÁ£ÀĸÁgÀ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ CªÀgÀ ºÉ Àj£À°è

ªÉÆúÀ£ï. PÉ

¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ C¢üãÀ PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð

¥ÀæªÁ¸ÉÆÃzÀåªÀÄ E¯ÁSÉ

ÀPÁðgÀzÀ DzÉñÀ ÀASÉå: ¥ÀæE 98 ¥ÀæªÁAiÉÆà 2014, ¢£ÁAPÀ:16-09-2014PÉÌ C£ÀħAzsÀ-1

zÀvÀÄÛ PÁAiÀÄðPÀæªÀÄzÀ CAUÀªÁV UÀÄgÀÄw¹gÀĪÀ ¥ÀæªÁ¹ vÁtUÀ¼À ¥ÀnÖ

PÀæ. ÀA. f Éè vÁ®ÆèPÀÄ ¥ÀæªÁ¹ ÀܼÀ

1. ¨ÁUÀ®PÉÆÃmÉ ¨ÁzÁ«Ä

1. ¨ÁzÁ«Ä

¥ÀlÖzÀPÀ®Äè

§£À±ÀAPÀj

ªÀĺÁPÀÆl

2.

3.

4.

ºÀÄ£ÀUÀÄAzÀ 5. LºÉƼÉ

Page 37: ¨ÁUÀ 1 - KarPage-81-124).pdf · 22/01/2015  · (e) Shri E. Rama Murthy had submitted a revised sketch on 31/5/2002 reducing the area to an extent of 380 acres. It was found that

sÁUÀ 1 PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ, d£ÀªÀj 22, 2015 117

2. ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ £ÀUÀgÀ ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ 6. ªÉAPÀl¥Áà Dmïð UÁå®j

PÀ§â£ï ¥ÁPïð ºÀwÛgÀ CPÉéÃjAiÀĪÀiï

¯Á¯ï¨ÁUï

n¥ÀÄà CgÀªÀÄ£É PÉÆÃmÉ

«±ÉéñÀégÀAiÀÄå ªÀÄÆå¹AiÀÄA

¦üæÃqÀA ¥ÁPïð

3. 7.

4. 8.

5. 9.

6. 10.

7. 11.

8. ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ zÀQët 12. ªÀÄÄvÁ宪ÀÄqÀĪÀÅ

9. 13. §£ÉßÃgÀÄWÀlÖ

10. ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ UÁæªÀiÁAvÀgÀ £É®ªÀÄAUÀ® 14. ²ªÀUÀAUÉ 11. ɼÀUÁ« ÉÊ®ºÉÆAUÀ® 15. QvÀÆÛgÀÄ 12. §¼Áîj ºÉƸÀ¥ÉÃmÉ 16. ºÀA¦ 13. 17. vÀÄAUÀ sÀzÁæ qÁåA 14. ©ÃzÀgï ©ÃzÀgï 18. ©ÃzÀgï PÉÆÃmÉ 15. ©eÁ¥ÀÄgÀ ©eÁ¥ÀÄgÀ 19. UÉÆïïUÀÄA§eï ªÀÄvÀÄÛ E¤ßvÀgÀ vÁtUÀ¼ÀÄ. 16. aPÀ̧¼Áî¥ÀÄgÀ aPÀ̧¼Áî¥ÀÄgÀ 20. £ÀA¢ ÉlÖ 17. 21. n¥ÀÄà«£À d£Àä ¸ÀܼÀ

sÉÆÃUÀ£ÀA¢Ã±ÀégÀ 18. aPÀ̪ÀÄUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ vÀjÃPÉgÉ 22. PɪÀÄätÄÚUÀÄAr 19. avÀæzÀÄUÀð »jAiÀÄÆgÀÄ 23. ªÁt«¯Á¸À ¸ÁUÀgÀ 20. zÁªÀtUÉgÉ ZÀ£ÀßVj 24. ±ÁAw ¸ÁUÀgÀ 21. UÀzÀUÀ UÀzÀUÀ 25. ®PÀÄÌAr 22. ºÁ¸À£À ÉîÆgÀÄ 26. ÉîÆgÀÄ

27. ºÀ¼É©ÃqÀÄ 23. ZÉ£ÀßgÁAiÀÄ¥ÀlÖt 28. ±ÀæªÀt ɼÀUÉÆüÀ 24. PÉÆqÀUÀÄ ªÀÄrPÉÃj 29. gÁeÁ¹Ãmï

30. C Éâ ¥sÁ¯ïì 25. PÉÆ¥Àà¼À UÀAUÁªÀw 31. D£ÉUÀÄA¢ 26. ªÀÄAqÀå ªÀÄzÀÆÝgÀÄ 32. PÉÆPÀÌgÉ É¼ÀÆîgÀÄ

²æÃgÀAUÀ¥ÀlÖt 33. ²æÃgÀAUÀ¥ÀlÖt 34. §ÈAzÁªÀ£À GzÁå£À 35. gÀAUÀ£ÀwlÄÖ 36. §®ªÀÄÄj ¥sÁ¯ïì / ¸ÀAUÀA

27. ªÉÄʸÀÆgÀÄ n.£ÀgÀ¹Ã¥ÀÄgÀ £ÀAd£ÀUÀÆqÀÄ

37. vÀ®PÁqÀÄ 38. ¸ÉÆêÀÄ£ÁxÀ¥ÀÄgÀ 39. £ÀAd£ÀUÀÆqÀÄ

28. gÁAiÀÄZÀÆgÀÄ gÁAiÀÄZÀÆgÀÄ 40. gÁAiÀÄZÀÆgÀÄ PÉÆÃmÉ 29. gÁªÀÄ£ÀUÀgÀ PÀ£ÀPÀ¥ÀÄgÀ 41. ªÉÄÃPÉzÁlÄ 30. ²ªÀªÉÆUÀÎ ¸ÁUÀgÀ 42. eÉÆÃUï ¥sÁ¯ïì 31. GqÀĦ 43. ªÀÄ Éà ©ÃZï

44. ¸ÉÃAmï ªÉÄÃj ¢éÃ¥À 32. GvÀÛgÀ PÀ£ÀßqÀ 45. mÁåUÉÆÃgï ©ÃZï

46. ªÀÄÄgÀÄqÉñÀégÀ

ªÉÆúÀ£ï. PÉ

¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ C¢üãÀ PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð

¥ÀæªÁ¸ÉÆÃzÀåªÀÄ E¯ÁSÉ

Page 38: ¨ÁUÀ 1 - KarPage-81-124).pdf · 22/01/2015  · (e) Shri E. Rama Murthy had submitted a revised sketch on 31/5/2002 reducing the area to an extent of 380 acres. It was found that

118 PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ, d£ÀªÀj 22, 2015 sÁUÀ 1

ÀPÁðgÀzÀ DzÉñÀ ÀASÉå: ¥ÀæE 98 ¥ÀæªÁAiÉÆà 2014 ¢£ÁAPÀ: 16-09-2014PÉÌ C£ÀħAzsÀ-II

F PÁAiÀÄðPÀæªÀÄzÀr gÀƦ¹gÀĪÀ G¥ÀPÀæªÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ/ZÀlĪÀnPÉUÀ¼ÀÄ F PɼÀPÀAqÀAwgÀÄvÀÛªÉ.

1. ¥ÀæªÁ¹ vÁt/¸ÀPÀÆåðmïì ¸ÀÄvÀÛªÀÄÄvÀÛ ¸ÀéZÀÒ ±ËZÁ®AiÀÄ, ¸ÀéZÀÒvÉ, DºÁgÀ ªÀĽUÉ CAUÀrUÀ¼À£ÀÄß MzÀV¸ÀĪÀÅzÀÄ C®èzÉ, ¸Ë® sÀåUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¤ªÀð»¸ÀĪÀÅzÀÄ.

2. ¸ÀܼÀzÀ LwºÁ¹PÀ/¸ÁA¸ÀÌøwPÀ ¥ÁæªÀÄÄRåvÉ §UÉÎ ªÀiÁUÀðzÀ²ðUÀ½UÉ vÀgÀ ÉÃw.

3. ºÁ° EgÀĪÀ AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉà ªÁåSÁå£À PÉÃAzÀæUÀ¼ÀÄ/ªÀ ÀÄÛ ¸ÀAUÀæºÁ®AiÀÄUÀ¼À G£ÀßwÃPÀj¸ÀĪÀÅzÀÄ.

4. C£ÉÃPÀ sÁµÉUÀ¼À°è ¥sÀ®PÀUÀ¼ÀÄ ªÉÆ Éʯï C¦èPÉõÀ£ï «rAiÉÆà UÉÊqïUÉ CªÀPÁ±À.

5. »jAiÀÄ £ÁUÀjÃPÀjUÉ «zÀÄåvï PÁgÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ MzÀV¸ÀĪÀ ºÁUÀÆ CªÀÅUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¤ªÀð»¸À®Ä.

6. ¸ÁägÀPÀUÀ¼À£ÀÄß PÁAwUÉƽ¸ÀĪÀÅzÀÄ.

7. ±ËZÁ®AiÀÄUÀ½UÉ ªÉÄgÀUÀÄ PÉÆqÀĪÀÅzÀÄ, WÀ£ÀvÁådå ¤ªÀðºÀuÉ C sÁå¸À C¼ÀªÀr¸ÀĪÀÅzÀÄ.

8. AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉà d¯Á±ÀAiÀÄUÀ¼À PÁAwªÀ¢üð¸ÀĪÀÅzÀÄ.

9. ¸ÁägÀPÀUÀ¼À ¸ÀAgÀPÀëuÉ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ªÀÄgÀĸÁÜ¥À£É (ASI/SAD gÀªÀgÀ C£ÀĪÉÆÃzÀ£ÉAiÉÆA¢UÉ).

DzÁUÀÆå ªÉÄîÌAqÀ ¥ÀnÖAiÀÄÄ «ªÀgÀuÁvÀäPÀªÁVzÀÄÝ, CAwªÀĪÁV PÉÊUÉƼÀî ÉÃPÁVgÀĪÀ ZÀlĪÀnPÉUÀ¼À §UÉÎ ¥ÀæPÀgÀt¢AzÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtzÀ ªÉÄÃ É CªÀ®A©vÀªÁVgÀÄvÀÛzÉ.

ªÉÆúÀ£ï. PÉ

¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ C¢üãÀ PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð

¥ÀæªÁ¸ÉÆÃzÀåªÀÄ E¯ÁSÉ

ÀPÁðgÀzÀ DzÉñÀ ÀASÉå: ¥ÀæE 98 ¥ÀæªÁAiÉÆà 2014 ¢£ÁAPÀ: 16-09-2014PÉÌ C£ÀħAzsÀ-III

zÀvÀÄÛ PÁAiÀÄðPÀæªÀÄzÀ AiÀiÁAwæPÀ ªÀåªÀ ÉÜ.

1) E¯ÁSÉ UÀÄgÀÄw¹gÀĪÀ vÁtUÀ¼À£ÀÄß/¸ÀPÀÆåðmïìUÀ¼À£ÀÄß PÁ¥ÉÆðgÉÃmï/¸ÁªÀðd¤PÀ G¢ÝªÉÄUÀ½UÉ ¥ÀæzÀ²ð¹ F vÁtUÀ¼À£ÀÄß zÀvÀÄÛ

vÉUÉzÀÄPÉÆAqÀÄ ¤ªÀðºÀuÉ ªÀiÁqÀĪÀ §UÉÎ CªÀgÀ ÉA§® PÉÆÃgÀĪÀÅzÀÄ. PÁAiÀÄðPÀæªÀĪÀ£ÀÄß MAzÉÆAzÉà PÁ¥ÉÆðgÉÃmïUÀ¼À

eÉÆvÉAiÀÄ°è ¸À sÉ £ÀqÉ ÀĪÀÅzÀgÉÆA¢UÉ CxÀªÁ gÉÆÃqï µÉÆà £ÀqÉ ÀĪÀÅzÀgÉÆA¢UÉ d£À¦æAiÀÄUÉƽ¸ÀĪÀÅzÀÄ.

2) vÁtUÀ¼À/¸ÁägÀPÀUÀ¼À£ÀÄß/¸ÀPÀÆåðmïìUÀ¼À£ÀÄß zÀvÀÄÛ vÉUÉzÀÄPÉÆAqÀÄ ¸Ë® sÀåUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¸ÀÄzsÁgÀuÉ ªÀiÁqÀ®Ä D¸ÀQÛ ªÀåPÀÛ¥Àr¸ÀĪÀ AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉÃ

PÁ¥ÉÆðgÉÃmï/¸ÁªÀðd¤PÀ G¢ÝªÉÄUÀ¼ÀÄ CzÀgÀ CSR sÁUÀªÁV E¯ÁSÉUÉ ¥Àæ¸ÁÛªÀ£ÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¸À°è À ÉÃPÁVgÀÄvÀÛzÉ. E¯ÁSÉAiÀÄ

£ÉÆÃqÀ ï C¢üPÁjAiÀiÁzÀ dAn ¤zÉÃð±ÀPÀgÀÄ (¦JAAiÀÄÄ) ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ¸ÀA§A¢ü¹zÀ PÁ¥ÉÆðgÉÃmï/¸ÁªÀðd¤PÀ G¢ÝªÉÄUÀ¼À

¥Àæw¤¢üAiÉÆA¢UÉ dAn vÀ¥Á¸ÀuÉ ªÀiÁqÀĪÀÅzÀÄ.

3) ªÀ ÀÄÛ ¸ÀAUÀæºÁ®AiÀÄ, ªÀÄvÁì®AiÀÄ, GzÁå£ÀªÀ£ÀUÀ¼ÀÄ, d¯Á±ÀAiÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ EvÁå¢ M¼ÀUÉÆAqÀAvÉ AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉà vÁtUÀ¼À zÀvÀÄÛ/G£ÀßwÃPÀj¸À®Ä

ªÀÄÄAzÉ §AzÀAvÀºÀ C¹ÛvÀéªÀżÀî PÁ¥ÉÆðgÉÃmïUÀ½UÉ ¸ÀA§A¢ü¹zÀ ªÀiÁvÀÈ E¯ÁSÉ/vÉÆÃlUÁjPÉ E¯ÁSÉAiÀÄ ¸ÀºÀªÀÄwAiÉÆA¢UÉ

¥ÀæªÁ¸ÉÆÃzÀåªÀÄ E¯ÁSÉ ªÀw¬ÄAzÀ J®è ¸ÀºÀPÁgÀ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ £ÉgÀªÀÅ MzÀV¸ÀĪÀÅzÀÄ.

4) CSR ¥ÁægÀA©ü¸ÀĪÀ ¥Àæ¸ÁÛªÀ£ÉUÀ½UÉ zÀvÀÄÛ PÁAiÀÄðPÀæªÀÄzÀ AiÉÆÃd£ÉAiÀÄr ²ÃWÀæ C£ÀĪÉÆÃzÀ£É ¥ÀqÉAiÀÄ®Ä C£ÀÄPÀÆ®ªÁUÀĪÀAvÉ

AiÉÆÃd£Á PÁAiÀÄðUÀvÀ ¸À«ÄwAiÀÄ£ÀÄß gÀa¸À ÁUÀĪÀÅzÀÄ. F ¸À«ÄwAiÀÄ°è ªÀiÁ£Àå ¥ÀæªÁ¸ÉÆÃzÀåªÀÄ ¸ÀaªÀgÀÄ ªÀÄÄRå¸ÀÜgÁVzÀÄÝ D

vÁt/¸ÀPÀÆåðmïì ªÁå¦ÛAiÀÄ CrAiÀÄ°è §gÀĪÀ EvÀgÉ E¯ÁSÉUÀ¼À ¸ÉÖÃPï ºÉÆîØgïìUÀ¼ÁzÀ JJ¸ïL, gÁdå ¥ÀÄgÁvÀvÀé, PÀ£ÀßqÀ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ

¸ÀA¸ÀÌøw, vÉÆÃlUÁjPÉ, CgÀtå, ¤ÃgÁªÀj £ÀUÀgÁ©üªÀÈ¢Þ/Dgïr¦Dgï, zsÁ«ÄðPÀ ¸ÀA¸ÉÜUÀ¼ÀÄ, PÀAzÁAiÀÄ E¯ÁSÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß

vÉÆqÀV¹PÉƼÀî¯ÁUÀĪÀÅzÀÄ. CzÀÆ C®èzÉ, D ¥ÀæªÁ¹ vÁt/¸ÀPÀÆåðmïì AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉà ¤¢ðµÀÖ ¸ÀA¸ÉÜ/E¯ÁSÉ/ªÀÄAqÀ½ ªÀ±ÀzÀ°èzÀÝgÉ

CAvÀºÀ AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉà E¯ÁSÉ/ªÀÄAqÀ½AiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¸ÀºÀ ¸À«ÄwAiÀÄÄ DAiÉÄÌ ªÀiÁrPÉƼÀÀÄzÀÄ.

5) AiÉÆÃd£ÉUÉ ¸ÀA§A¢ü¹zÀ J¯Áè C£ÀĪÉÆÃzÀ£ÉUÀ¼ÀÄ, PÁ¬ÄzÉUÀ¼À C£ÀĸÀgÀuÉ, ¥ÁæZÀåªÀ ÀÄÛ, ¥ÀgÀA¥ÀgÉ ¸ÀÆvÀæUÀ¼À£ÀÄß C£ÀĸÀgÀuÉ ªÀiÁqÀĪÀ

ªÀÄvÀÄÛ CªÀÅUÀ¼À CªÀ±Àå gÀPÀëuÉ ªÀiÁqÀĪÀ dªÁ¨ÁÝjAiÀÄÄ D vÁt/¸ÁägÀPÀ M¼À¥ÀqÀĪÀ E¯ÁSÉUÉ ¸ÉÃjzÁÝVgÀÄvÀÛzÉ.

ªÉÆúÀ£ï. PÉ

¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ C¢üãÀ PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð

¥ÀæªÁ¸ÉÆÃzÀåªÀÄ E¯ÁSÉ

Page 39: ¨ÁUÀ 1 - KarPage-81-124).pdf · 22/01/2015  · (e) Shri E. Rama Murthy had submitted a revised sketch on 31/5/2002 reducing the area to an extent of 380 acres. It was found that

sÁUÀ 1 PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ, d£ÀªÀj 22, 2015 119

TOURISM SECRETARIAT

Subject: Approval to initiate Programme for Adoption of Tourist Destination in collaboration with Corporates.

Read: File No. Pra E /Yo-2/226/2013-14 of Director of Tourism Department.

PREAMBLE:

In the budget speech of 2014-15 Hon’ble Chief Minister has announced the adoption of tourist destination/circuits programme

in collaboration with Corporates.

2. The Director of Tourism has reported that Government of India launched “Campaign Clean India” programme and also took

up a major social awareness, media campaign under the brand ‘Athithidevobhava’. by involving public and private stakeholders as

part of their Corporate Social Responsibility. India Tourism Development Corporation (ITDC) adopted Qutab Minar, New Delhi as a

pilot project under Campaign Clean India. ONGC also expressed their willingness to adopt the major monuments under CSR such as

Taj Mahal at Agra, Ellora caves. in Maharashtra, Elephant caves in Maharashtra, Red Fort in Delhi, Golkonda Fort Hyderabad

Mahabalipuram.

3. Karnataka aptly called as “One State Many Worlds” is the only state that offers all types of experience to any tourists, be it

heritage, beaches, pilgrims, adventure, wild life etc., It is home to two world heritage sites at Hampi and Pattadakallu and several

equally important heritage sites throughout Karnataka. Department of Tourism is mandated to provide basic tourism infrastructure,

undertake promotion and publicity of tourist destinations and encourage private investment in tourism sector. The Department has

identified nearly 319 tourist destinations across the State where tourist facilities need to be provided/expanded or upgraded. However,

there are challenges faced by the Department in undertaking developmental works as these tourist destinations are either owned or

regulated by Archaeology Survey of India, State Archaeology, Horticulture, Water Resources Department, Muzarai institutions, Mysore

Palace Board etc.,

4 In order to ensure better experience to the tourists in Karnataka, proper facilities such as basic amenities, signages,

interpretation centres, tourist friendly vehicles, proper guides etc., are required at these tourist destinations. The Department has

initially identified 46 destinations for providing such facilities by the Corporate Sector. The list is not an exhaustive one and

corporates/PSUs can suggest any destination they want to adopt. The list of destinations is enclosed at Annexure-I

5. Director of Tourism has proposed a Committee to examine and approve the proposals received from the Corporate Sector

as under:

a. Committee shall approve the proposal submitted by the Corporate entity/PSUs should include the activities that are

proposed along with their feasibility and budget outlay.

b. Committee shall ensure if any approval is required from various authorities, the committee shall fix the timelines for

obtaining the same.

c. Committee can identify other tourist destinations for adoption in addition to the 46 destination indicated in the

Annexure-I.

d. Committee can discuss and decide any other issues concerning the facilities and infrastructure to be provided to

the tourist destination.

6. Under this programme, Corporates will finance the activities, operations and maintain the facilities on their own rather than

transferring the funds to any Government body/department. Corporate willing to adopt such tourist destination will also ensure

adequate funding is provided to improve and maintain the facilities for a minimum period of 5 years.

7. Duration of adoption would be for a period of 5 years after signing MoU with the Nodal Department and Department of

Tourism. The MoU will be renewed for period of another 5 years if it is mutually agreed between the parties. An independent evaluator

appointed by the Director of Tourism will periodically evaluate the implementation of the programme.

8. Joint Director (PMU) of Directorate of Tourism will be the Nodal Officer to oversee the adoption programme. Wherever tourist

destinations and monuments either belonging to Archaeological Survey of India or require regulatory consent, in such cases due

approvals shall be obtained from the concerned authority through joint efforts of Tourism Department.

9. Accordingly, the Director of Tourism has solicited the approval of the Government to launch a Programme for Adoption of

Tourist Destination in collaboration with Corporates for the 46 tourist destinations /circuits as mentioned in Annexure-I

After detailed examination of the proposal Government is pleased to issue the following order:

Government Order No. TD 98 TTT 2014 Bangalore,Dated:16-09-2014.

In the circumstances explained above approval of the Government is accorded for adoption of identified 46 tourist destinations

/circuits or part there of as detailed in Annexure-I with the initiatives/activities envisaged under this programme and the mechanism for

adoption as per Annexure-II and Annexure-III respectively, with the following conditions.

1) The adoption programme will endeavor to create tourist facilities etc., as given in the Annexure-II

including the maintenance thereof.

2) The duration of the adoption is 5 years and further extended by 5 years.

Page 40: ¨ÁUÀ 1 - KarPage-81-124).pdf · 22/01/2015  · (e) Shri E. Rama Murthy had submitted a revised sketch on 31/5/2002 reducing the area to an extent of 380 acres. It was found that

120 PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ, d£ÀªÀj 22, 2015 sÁUÀ 1

3) Corporates under CSR programme shall earmark the funds separately for implementation and

maintenance of programme and financial and physical progress of the programme shall be reported to

the Director of Tourism.

To examine and approve the proposals, Government is pleased to constitute a Project Implementation Committee with the

following members.

1 Minister for Tourism - Chairman

2 Additional Chief Secretary to Government Tourism Department - Member

3 Additional Chief Secretary to Government Commerce & Industry Department - Member

4 Additional Chief Secretary to Government, Forest, Ecology and Environment Department. - Member

5 Principal Secretary to Government, Finance Dept. - Member

6 Principal Secretary to Government, Kannada & Culture, Information Department. - Member

7 Director, Archaeological Survey of India, GOI -Member

8 Principal Chief Conservator of Forest, Forest Department. - Member

9 Director, Commerce & Industry Department - Member

10 Director, Kannada & Culture Dept. - Member

11 Commissioner, Archaeology, Museums and Heritage Department - Member

12 Invitees – as desired by the Committee Member

13 Director, Tourism Department - convener

The above Committee is constituted to –

a. Approve the proposals received from the corporate sector.

b. Include any other tourist destinations, if required.

c. Solicit and ensure any approvals and consent required by various authorities.

d. Co-opt members and stakeholders whose consent or expertise is required for approval of the project.

e. Take any other decision to facilitate implementation of the programme.

By Order and in the name of the Governor of Karnataka

Mohan. K

Under Secretary to Government

Tourism Department

Annexure-I

To Government Order No. TD 98 TTT 2014 Dated:16-09-2014

List of Tourist destinations under Adoption Programme

Sl no. District Taluk Tourist Destination

1. Bagalkot Badami

1. Badami

Pattadkal

Banashankari

Mahakoota

2.

3.

4.

Hungund 5. Aihole

2. Bangalore Urban Bangalore 6. Venkatappa Art Gallery

Aquarium near Cubbon Park

Lalbagh

Tippu Palace Fort

Vishveshwaraiah Museum

Freedom Park

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

Bangalore South 12. Muthyalamaduvu

13. Bannerghatta

3. Bangalore Rural Nelamangala 14. Shivagange

Page 41: ¨ÁUÀ 1 - KarPage-81-124).pdf · 22/01/2015  · (e) Shri E. Rama Murthy had submitted a revised sketch on 31/5/2002 reducing the area to an extent of 380 acres. It was found that

sÁUÀ 1 PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ, d£ÀªÀj 22, 2015 121

4. Belgaum Bailahongala 15. Kittur

5. Bellary Hospet 16. Hampi

17. Tungabhadra Dam

6. Bidar Bidar 18. Bidar Fort

7. Bijapur Bijapur 19. Golgumbaz & other Destinations

8. Chikkaballapura Chikkaballapura 20. Nandi hills

21. Tippu’s Birth Place Bhoganandishwara

9. Chikmagalur Tarikere 22. Kemmannugundi

10. Chitradurga Hiriyur 23. Vanivilas Sagar

11. Davangere Channagiri 24. Shanthisagar

12. Gadag Gadag 25. Lakkundi

13. Hassan Belur 26. Belur

27. Halebidu

Channarayapatna 28. Shravanabelagola

14. Kodagu Madikeri 29. Raja Seat

30. Abbey Falls

15. Koppal Gangavathi 31. Anegundi

16. Mandya Maddur 32. Kokkarebellur

Srirangapatna 33. Srirangapatna

34. Brindavan Gardens

35. Ranganathittu

36. Balmuri Falls/Sangam

17. Mysore T.Narasipura

Nanjangud

37. Talkad

38. Somanathpur

39. Nanjangud

18. Raichur Raichur 40. Raichur Fort

19. Ramanagara Kanakapura 41. Mekedatu

20. Shimoga Sagar 42. Jog falls

21. Udupi - 43. Malpe Beach

44. St. Mary’s Island

22. Uttara Kannada - 45. Tagore Beach

46. Murudeshwara

Mohan. K

Under Secretary to Government

Tourism Department

Annexure II

To Government Order No.TD 98 TTT 2014 dt: 16-09-2014

The initiatives/activities envisaged under this programme

1. Providing and maintaining the facilities in and round the destination such as clean toilets, cleanliness,

souvenir shops, food courts.

2. Training of guides on historical/cultural importance of the place.

3. Upgrading any existing interpretation centres/museums.

4. Providing signages, mobile applications, audio guides in different languages.

5. Providing electric cars for senior citizens and maintain them.

6. Illumination of monuments.

7. Refurbishing the toilets, implementing Solid Waste Management practice.

8. Rejuvenating any water bodies.

9. Conservation and restoration of monuments (with the approval of ASI/SAD)

Page 42: ¨ÁUÀ 1 - KarPage-81-124).pdf · 22/01/2015  · (e) Shri E. Rama Murthy had submitted a revised sketch on 31/5/2002 reducing the area to an extent of 380 acres. It was found that

122 PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ, d£ÀªÀj 22, 2015 sÁUÀ 1

The above list is illustrative and activities that are to be undertaken would depend on a case to case basis and to be approved

by the Committee.

Mohan. K

Under Secretary to Government

Tourism Department

Annexure-III

To Government Order No.TD 98 TTT 2014 dt: 16-09-2014

Mechanism for adoption of programme:

1. The destinations that are shortlisted by the Department will be presented to the corporates/public undertakings and seek their

support in adoption and maintenance of these destinations. This would be popularized either by one to one meeting with Corporates or

by having road shows.

2. Any corporate entity/PSU interested in adopting the destinations/monuments and improving the facilities will need to submit a

proposal to the department as part of their CSR. Joint inspection would be conducted by Joint Director (PMU) the Nodal Officer of the

department and the nominated member of the Corporate entity /PSU

3. All cooperation and assistance would be provided to the corporate entity who intend to adopt/upgrade and/or maintain any

destination by the Department of Tourism including museums, aquariums, parks, water bodies lakes etc., subject to the consent of the

parent/Horticulture Department.

4. In order to facilitate speedy approvals and adoption programme, a Project Implementation committee will be set up to

approval the proposals of such CSR initiatives. The Committee will be headed by Hon'ble Tourism Minister and involve all the

stakeholders from various departments pertaining to that destinations such as ASI, State Archeology, Kannada and Culture,

Horticulture, Forest, Water Resources, Urban Development Department/RD&PR, Mujarai institutions, Revenue Department. The

Committee also can co-opt any other department/board if the destination is owned or tourist destination owned by particular

agency/department/board.

5. All necessary approvals compliance with regulation, archeology and heritage norms, necessary safe guards in carrying out

these initiatives shall be the responsibility of the respective department to whom these destinations/monuments belong.

PR. 779

SC. 200

Mohan. K

Under Secretary to Government

Tourism Department

M¼ÁqÀ½vÀ ÀaªÁ®AiÀÄ «µÀAiÀÄ: ²æà £ÀgÀºÀj, ¹ºÉZï¹-316, PÉÆAZÁªÀgÀA ¥Éưøï oÁuÉ, PÀ®§ÄgÀV f Éè EªÀgÀ ¥ÀjµÀÌgÀt ªÉÄîä£À«

PÀÄjvÀÄ CAwªÀÄ DzÉñÀ.

NzÀ¯ÁVzÉ: 1) ²¸ÀÄÛ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀ ºÁUÀÆ ¥Éưøï C¢üÃPÀëPÀgÀÄ, PÀ®§ÄgÀV f Éè, PÀ®§ÄgÀV EªÀgÀ DzÉñÀ ¸ÀASÉå: ¦Dgï/254/UÀÄ/2012 (rN© ¸ÀA. 1504/2013) ¢£ÁAPÀ 27.07.2013

2) ªÉÄîä£À« ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀ ºÁUÀÆ DgÀPÀëPÀ ªÀĺÁ ¤jÃPÀëPÀgÀÄ, F±Á£Àå ªÀ®AiÀÄ, PÀ®§ÄgÀV EªÀgÀ DzÉñÀ ¸ÀASÉå: C¦Ã®Ä/72/FªÀ/2013 (D.¥ÀÄ.¸ÀA.658/FªÀ/2013) ¢£ÁAPÀ 30.11.2013

3) CfðzÁgÀgÀ ¥ÀjµÀÌgÀt ªÉÄîä£À« Cfð ¢£ÁAPÀ: 02.02.2014

4) ªÀĺÁ ¤zÉÃð±ÀPÀgÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ DgÀPÀëPÀ ªÀĺÁ ¤jÃPÀëPÀgÀÄ, ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ, EªÀgÀ ¥ÀvÀæ ¸ÀASÉå: C¦Ã®Ä(2)93/2013-14 ¢£ÁAPÀ: 02.06.2014

5) PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ÉÆÃPÀ ÉêÁ DAiÉÆÃUÀzÀ ¥ÀvÀæ ¸ÀASÉå: ¦J¸ï¹ 127 ¹J£ïJ¸ï 2014 ¢£ÁAPÀ: 18.09.2014

¥Àæ¸ÁÛªÀ£É:

²æà £ÀgÀºÀj, ¹ºÉZï¹-316, PÉÆAZÁªÀgÀA ¥Éưøï oÁuÉ, PÀ®§ÄgÀV (E£ÀÄß ªÀÄÄAzÉ CfðzÁgÀgÉAzÀÄ PÀgÉAiÀÄ®àqÀĪÀ) EªÀgÀÄ F »AzÉ eÉêÀVð ¥Éưøï oÁuÉ E°è PÀvÀðªÀå ¤ªÀð»¸ÀÄwÛzÁÝUÀ, PÀvÀðªÀåzÀ°è zÀÄ£ÀðqÀvÉ, ¤®ðPÀëöåvÀ£À, ÉÃdªÁ¨ÁÝjvÀ£À ¥ÀæzÀ²ð¹zÀ PÁgÀtzÀ ªÉÄÃ É EªÀgÀ «gÀÄzÀÞ PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå ¥Éưøï (²¸ÀÄÛ £ÀqÀªÀ½) ¤AiÀĪÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ 1965gÀ ¤AiÀĪÀÄ 7gÀr F PɼÀPÀAqÀ zÉÆõÁgÉÆÃ¥ÀuÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ºÉÆj¸À ÁVzÉ.

zÉÆõÁgÉÆÃ¥ÀuÉ:-

“¤ªÀÄUÉ AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉà PÀvÀðªÀåPÉÌ £ÉëĹzÀgÀÆ, ¤ÃªÀÅ PÀvÀðªÀåzÀ ªÉÄÃ É E®èzÉà EzÀÝgÀÆ PÀÆqÀ ¸ÀªÀĪÀ ÀÛçzÀ°è PÀ®§ÄgÀV¢AzÀ eÉêÀVð ªÀÈvÀÛ ªÁå¦ÛAiÀÄ°è J°è ÉÃPÁzÀgÀÆ ªÀÄÄRå gÉÆÃrUÉ ¤AvÀÄPÉÆAqÀÄ §gÀ ºÉÆÃUÀĪÀ ªÁºÀ£ÀUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¤°è¹ ZÁ®PÀjAzÀ ¸ÁªÀðd¤PÀgÀ ¸ÀªÀÄPÀëªÀÄzÀ°èAiÉÄà ºÀt ªÀ ÀÆ° ªÀiÁr E¯ÁSÉUÉ CUËgÀªÀ vÀgÀĪÀAvÉ £ÀqÉzÀÄPÉÆAqÀÄ PÀvÀðªÀåzÀ°è zÀÄ£ÀðqÀvÉ CwêÀ ¤®ðPÀëöåvÀ£À ºÁUÀÆ ÉÃdªÁ¨ÁÝjvÀ£À ¥ÀæzÀ²ð¹gÀÄwÛÃj.”

Page 43: ¨ÁUÀ 1 - KarPage-81-124).pdf · 22/01/2015  · (e) Shri E. Rama Murthy had submitted a revised sketch on 31/5/2002 reducing the area to an extent of 380 acres. It was found that

sÁUÀ 1 PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ, d£ÀªÀj 22, 2015 123

ªÉÄîÌAqÀ DgÉÆÃ¥ÀzÀ ªÉÄÃ É CfðzÁgÀgÀ ¸ÀªÀÄeÁ¬Ä¶ ¥ÀqÉzÀÄ, CzÀ£ÉÆߥÀàzÀ ²¸ÀÄÛ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀ ºÁUÀÆ ¥Éưøï C¢üÃPÀëPÀgÀÄ, PÀ®§ÄgÀV f Éè, PÀ®§ÄgÀV EªÀgÀÄ ªÉÄÃ É PÀæªÀÄ ¸ÀASÉå: (1)gÀ°è NzÀ ÁzÀ ¢£ÁAPÀ 27.07.2013gÀ DzÉñÀzÀ°è EªÀgÀ MAzÀÄ ªÁ¶ðPÀ ªÉÃvÀ£À §rÛAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ªÀÄÄA§gÀĪÀ ªÁ¶ðPÀ ªÉÃvÀ£À §rÛAiÀÄ ªÉÄÃ É ¥ÀjuÁªÀÄ ©ÃgÀzÀAvÉ MAzÀÄ ªÀµÀðUÀ¼À PÁ® ªÀÄÄAzÀÆr, ¸ÀzÀjAiÀĪÀgÀ CªÀiÁ£ÀwÛ£À CªÀ¢üAiÀÄ£ÀÄß CªÀiÁ£ÀvÉÛAzÀÄ ¥ÀjUÀt¹ DzÉò¹gÀÄvÁÛgÉ.

F DzÉñÀzÀ «gÀÄzÀÞ ¸À°è¹zÀ ªÉÄîä£À«AiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¥Àj²Ã°¹zÀ ªÉÄîä£À« ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀ ºÁUÀÆ DgÀPÀëPÀ ªÀĺÁ ¤jÃPÀëPÀgÀÄ, F±Á£Àå ªÀ®AiÀÄ, UÀÄ®âUÁð EªÀgÀÄ ¢£ÁAPÀ 30.11.2013gÀ DzÉñÀzÀ°è ªÉÄîä£À«AiÀÄ£ÀÄß wgÀ ÀÌj¹gÀÄvÁÛgÉ.

F JgÀqÀÆ DzÉñÀUÀ¼À «gÀÄzÀÞ D.¥ÉÆ.C.gÀªÀgÀÄ ¸ÀPÁðgÀPÉÌ ¥ÀjµÀÌgÀt ªÉÄîä£À«AiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¸À°è¹gÀÄvÁÛgÉ. ¥ÀjµÀÌgÀt ªÉÄîä£À«AiÀÄ°è£À ªÁzÁA±ÀUÀ¼À£ÀÄß zÁR ÉUÀ¼ÉÆA¢UÉ ¥Àj²Ã°¸À ÁVzÉ. ¥Àæ¸ÀÄÛvÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtzÀ°è CfðzÁgÀgÀÄ vÀªÀÄä ¸ÀªÀÄeÁ¬Ä¶AiÀÄ°è vÀ£Àß »jAiÀÄ ªÀÄUÀ¤UÉ C¥ÀWÁvÀzÀ°è §®UÁ®Ä ªÀÄÄj¢zÀÝPÉÌ, ¸ÀzÀj §®UÁ°£À°è gÁqï£ÀÄß C¼ÀªÀr¹zÀÄÝ, CzÀÄ ªÉÄðAzÀ ªÉÄÃ É ¸É¦ÖPï DUÀÄwÛzÀÄÝ, ªÀÄPÀ̼À AiÉÆÃUÀPÉëêÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ G¥ÀZÀj¸À®Ä D¸ÀàvÉæUÉ ºÉÆÃUÀ®Ä ¸ÀªÀÄAiÀÄzÀ «¼ÀA§ªÁzÀ PÁgÀt MAzÉgÀqÀÄ ¸À® ¸ÀªÀĪÀ ÀÛçzÀ°è SÁ¸ÀV ªÁºÀ£À §¼À¹ ºÉÆÃUÀĪÀÅzÀ£ÀÄß £ÉÆÃr ¸ÁªÀðd¤PÀgÀÄ £ÀªÀÄä ¥Éưøï E¯ÁSÉUÉ ¥sÉÆÃ£ï ªÀÄÆ®PÀ w½¹gÀĪÀÅzÁV «ªÀgÀuÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¤ÃrgÀÄvÁÛgÉ. ºÁUÀÆ ¥Àæ¸ÀÄÛvÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtzÀ°è ¸ÀzÀj DgÉÆævÀ C¢üPÁjAiÀÄÄ ºÀt ªÀ ÀÆ° ªÀiÁrzÁÝgÉ JA§ §UÉÎ ¥ÀÄgÁªÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ²¸ÀÄÛ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀªÀÅ ¥Àj²Ã°¸ÀzÉà EgÀĪÀÅzÀÄ PÀAqÀÄ §gÀĪÀ »£Éß ÉAiÀÄ°è CfðzÁgÀgÀ ¥ÀjµÀÌgÀt ªÉÄîä£À«AiÀÄ£ÀÄß sÁUÀ±ÀB ¥ÀÄgÀ ÀÌj¹ ²¸ÀÄÛ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀªÀÅ «¢ü¹gÀĪÀ zÀAqÀ£ÁzÉñÀªÀ£ÀÄß ªÀiÁ¥Àðr¸ÀĪÀ PÀÄjvÀAvÉ ªÉÄÃ É NzÀ ÁzÀ (4)gÀ ¥ÀvÀæzÀ°è PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ÉÆÃPÀ ÉêÁ DAiÉÆÃUÀzÀ ¸ÀºÀªÀÄwAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¥ÀqÉzÀÄ ¸ÀPÁðgÀªÀÅ F PɼÀPÀAqÀAvÉ DzÉò¹zÉ

ÀPÁðgÀzÀ DzÉñÀ ÀASÉå: ME 21 ¥ÉƹC 2014 ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ, ¢£ÁAPÀ: 24.11.2014

¥Àæ¸ÁÛªÀ£ÉAiÀÄ°è «ªÀj¹gÀĪÀ PÁgÀtUÀ¼À »£Éß ÉAiÀÄ°è, PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¥Éưøï C¢ü¤AiÀĪÀÄ 1963gÀ ¸ÉPÀë£ï 25gÀrAiÀÄ°è ¸ÀPÁðgÀPÉÌ ¥ÀæzÀvÀÛªÁzÀ C¢üPÁgÀªÀ£ÀÄß ZÀ¯Á¬Ä¹, ²æà £ÀgÀºÀj, ¹ºÉZï¹-316, PÉÆAZÁªÀgÀA ¥Éưøï oÁuÉ, PÀ®§ÄgÀV f Éè EªÀjUÉ ²¸ÀÄÛ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀªÀÅ «¢ü¹gÀĪÀ zÀAqÀ£ÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ªÀiÁ¥Àðr¹ EªÀjUÉ “ªÁUÀÝAqÀ£É” (censure)AiÀÄ£ÀÄß «¢ü¹ ¸ÀzÀjAiÀĪÀgÀ CªÀiÁ£ÀwÛ£À CªÀ¢üAiÀÄ£ÀÄß CªÀgÀ ºÀQÌ£À°ègÀĪÀ gÀeÉAiÉÄAzÀÄ ¥ÀjUÀt¹ DzÉò¹zÉ.

PR. 866

PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥Á®gÀ DzÉñÁ£ÀĸÁgÀ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ CªÀgÀ ºÉ Àj£À°è,

eÉ.r. ªÀÄzsÀÄZÀAzÀæ vÉÃd¹é

¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ C¢üãÀ PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð,

M¼ÁqÀ½vÀ E¯ÁSÉ (¥ÉÆ°Ã¸ï ¸ÉêÉUÀ¼ÀÄ).

M¼ÁqÀ½vÀ ÀaªÁ®AiÀÄ «µÀAiÀÄ: ²æà £ÀgÀºÀj, ¹ºÉZï¹-316, PÉÆAZÁªÀgÀA ¥Éưøï oÁuÉ, PÀ®§ÄgÀV f Éè EªÀgÀ ¥ÀjµÀÌgÀt ªÉÄîä£À«

PÀÄjvÀÄ CAwªÀÄ DzÉñÀ.

NzÀ¯ÁVzÉ: 1)

²¸ÀÄÛ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀ ºÁUÀÆ ¥Éưøï C¢üÃPÀëPÀgÀÄ, PÀ®§ÄgÀV f¯Éè, PÀ®§ÄgÀV EªÀgÀ DzÉñÀ ¸ÀASÉå: ¦Dgï/205/UÀÄ/2012 (rN© ¸ÀA. 1405/2013) ¢£ÁAPÀ 20.07.2013

2) ªÉÄîä£À« ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀ ºÁUÀÆ DgÀPÀëPÀ ªÀĺÁ ¤jÃPÀëPÀgÀÄ, F±Á£Àå ªÀ®AiÀÄ, PÀ®§ÄgÀV EªÀgÀ DzÉñÀ ¸ÀASÉå: C¦Ã®Ä/84/FªÀ/2013/1921 (D.¥ÀÄ.¸ÀA.557/FªÀ/2013) ¢£ÁAPÀ 28.11.2013

3) CfðzÁgÀgÀ ¥ÀjµÀÌgÀt ªÉÄîä£À« Cfð ¢£ÁAPÀ: 01.02.2014

4) ªÀĺÁ ¤zÉÃð±ÀPÀgÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ DgÀPÀëPÀ ªÀĺÁ ¤jÃPÀëPÀgÀÄ, ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ, EªÀgÀ ¥ÀvÀæ ¸ÀASÉå: C¦Ã®Ä(2)94/2013-14 ¢£ÁAPÀ: 02.06.2014

5) PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ÉÆÃPÀ ÉêÁ DAiÉÆÃUÀzÀ ¥ÀvÀæ ¸ÀASÉå: ¦J¸ï¹ 139 ¹J£ïJ¸ï 2014 ¢£ÁAPÀ: 18.09.2014

¥Àæ¸ÁÛªÀ£É:

²æà £ÀgÀºÀj, ¹ºÉZï¹-316 (E£ÀÄß ªÀÄÄAzÉ CfðzÁgÀgÉAzÀÄ PÀgÉAiÀÄ®àqÀĪÀ) EªÀgÀÄ PÉÆAZÁªÀgÀA ¥Éưøï oÁuÉ, UÀÄ®âUÁð E°è PÀvÀðªÀå ¤ªÀð»¸ÀÄwÛzÁÝUÀ, PÀvÀðªÀåzÀ°è zÀÄ£ÀðqÀvÉ, ¤®ðPÀëöåvÀ£À, ÉÃdªÁ¨ÁÝjvÀ£À ¥ÀæzÀ²ð¹zÀ PÁgÀtzÀ ªÉÄÃ É EªÀgÀ «gÀÄzÀÞ PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå ¥Éưøï (²¸ÀÄÛ £ÀqÀªÀ½) ¤AiÀĪÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ 1965gÀ ¤AiÀĪÀÄ 7gÀr F PɼÀPÀAqÀ zÉÆõÁgÉÆÃ¥ÀuÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ºÉÆj¸À ÁVzÉ.

zÉÆõÁgÉÆÃ¥ÀuÉ:-

“oÁuÉ ¢£ÀZÀj PÀvÀðªÀåzÀ°èzÁÝUÀ oÁuÉ ©lÄÖ ºÉÆgÀUÀqÉ ºÉÆÃV gÉÆÃr£À ªÉÄÃ É ¸ÀAZÀj¸ÀÄwzÀÝ DmÉÆÃUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¤°è¹, ZÁ®PÀgÀ£ÀÄß ºÉzÀj¹ ºÀt ªÀ ÀÆ° ªÀiÁr C¸ÀºÀåªÁV ªÀwð¹ PÀvÀðªÀåzÀ°è zÀÄ£ÀðqÀvÉ ¤®ðPÀëöåvÀ£À ºÁUÀÆ ÉÃdªÁ¨ÁÝjvÀ£À ¥ÀæzÀ²ð¹gÀÄwÛÃj.”

Page 44: ¨ÁUÀ 1 - KarPage-81-124).pdf · 22/01/2015  · (e) Shri E. Rama Murthy had submitted a revised sketch on 31/5/2002 reducing the area to an extent of 380 acres. It was found that

124 PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ, d£ÀªÀj 22, 2015 sÁUÀ 1

ªÉÄîÌAqÀ DgÉÆÃ¥ÀzÀ ªÉÄÃ É CfðzÁgÀgÀ ¸ÀªÀÄeÁ¬Ä¶ ¥ÀqÉzÀÄ, CzÀ£ÉÆߥÀàzÀ ²¸ÀÄÛ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀ ºÁUÀÆ ¥Éưøï C¢üÃPÀëPÀgÀÄ, PÀ®§ÄgÀV f Éè, PÀ®§ÄgÀV EªÀgÀÄ ªÉÄÃ É PÀæªÀÄ ¸ÀASÉå: (1)gÀ°è NzÀ ÁzÀ ¢£ÁAPÀ 20.07.2013gÀ DzÉñÀzÀ°è EªÀgÀ MAzÀÄ ªÁ¶ðPÀ ªÉÃvÀ£À §rÛAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ªÀÄÄA§gÀĪÀ ªÁ¶ðPÀ ªÉÃvÀ£À §rÛUÀ¼À ªÉÄÃ¯É ¥ÀjuÁªÀÄ ©ÃgÀzÀAvÉ DgÀÄ wAUÀ¼ÀÄUÀ¼À PÁ® ªÀÄÄAzÀÆr DzÉò¹gÀÄvÁÛgÉ.

F DzÉñÀzÀ «gÀÄzÀÞ ¸À°è¹zÀ ªÉÄîä£À«AiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¥Àj²Ã°¹zÀ ªÉÄîä£À« ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀ ºÁUÀÆ DgÀPÀëPÀ ªÀĺÁ ¤jÃPÀëPÀgÀÄ, F±Á£Àå ªÀ®AiÀÄ, PÀ®§ÄgÀV EªÀgÀÄ ¢£ÁAPÀ 28.11.2013gÀ DzÉñÀzÀ°è ªÉÄîä£À«AiÀÄ£ÀÄß wgÀ ÀÌj¹gÀÄvÁÛgÉ.

F JgÀqÀÆ DzÉñÀUÀ¼À «gÀÄzÀÞ D.¥ÉÆ.C.gÀªÀgÀÄ ¸ÀPÁðgÀPÉÌ ¥ÀjµÀÌgÀt ªÉÄîä£À«AiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¸À°è¹gÀÄvÁÛgÉ. ¥ÀjµÀÌgÀt ªÉÄîä£À«AiÀÄ°è£À ªÁzÁA±ÀUÀ¼À£ÀÄß zÁR ÉUÀ¼ÉÆA¢UÉ ¥Àj²Ã°¸À ÁVzÉ. ¥Àæ¸ÀÄÛvÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtzÀ°è ²¸ÀÄÛ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀªÀÅ vÀ£Àß DzÉñÀzÀ°è ¢£ÁAPÀ 28.10.2012gÀAzÀÄ £ÀqÉzÀ MAzÀÄ WÀl£ÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß G ÉèÃT¹ zÀAqÀ£ÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¤ÃrzÉ. EzÀÄ £ÁåAiÀĸÀªÀÄävÀªÁUÀĪÀÅ¢®è. EzÉà WÀl£ÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß zÉÆõÁgÉÆÃ¥Àt ¥ÀnÖAiÀÄ°è £ÀªÀÄÆ¢¹, DgÉÆævÀ ¥Éưøï C¢üPÁjUÉ CzÀgÀ §UÉÎ ¸ÀªÀÄeÁ¬Ä¶ ¤ÃqÀ®Ä CªÀPÁ±À ¤ÃqÀ ÉÃPÁVvÀÄÛ. F »£Éß ÉAiÀÄ°è ²¸ÀÄÛ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀzÀ ¢£ÁAPÀ 20.07.2013gÀ zÀAqÀ£ÁzÉñÀªÀÅ zÉÆõÀ¥ÀÆjvÀªÁVzÉ ºÁUÀÆ ¸ÁªÀiÁ£Àå £ÁåAiÀÄzÀ vÀvÀéUÀ½UÉ «gÀÄzÀÞªÁVzÉ. F »£Éß ÉAiÀÄ°è CfðzÁgÀgÀ ¥ÀjµÀÌgÀt ªÉÄîä£À«AiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¥ÀÄgÀ ÀÌj¹ ²¸ÀÄÛ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀzÀ zÀAqÀ£ÁzÉñÀªÀ£ÀÄß ªÀiÁ¥Àðr¸ÀĪÀ PÀÄjvÀAvÉ ªÉÄÃ¯É NzÀ¯ÁzÀ (4)gÀ ¥ÀvÀæzÀ°è PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ÉÆÃPÀ ÉêÁ DAiÉÆÃUÀzÀ ¸ÀºÀªÀÄwAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¥ÀqÉzÀÄ ¸ÀPÁðgÀªÀÅ F PɼÀPÀAqÀAvÉ DzÉò¹zÉ

ÀPÁðgÀzÀ DzÉñÀ ÀASÉå: ME 22 ¥ÉƹC 2014 ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ, ¢£ÁAPÀ: 24.11.2014

¥Àæ¸ÁÛªÀ£ÉAiÀÄ°è «ªÀj¹gÀĪÀ PÁgÀtUÀ¼À »£Éß ÉAiÀÄ°è, PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¥Éưøï C¢ü¤AiÀĪÀÄ 1963gÀ ¸ÉPÀë£ï 25 gÀrAiÀÄ°è ¸ÀPÁðgÀPÉÌ ¥ÀæzÀvÀÛªÁzÀ C¢üPÁgÀªÀ£ÀÄß ZÀ¯Á¬Ä¹, ²æà £ÀgÀºÀj, ¹ºÉZï¹-316, PÉÆAZÁªÀgÀA ¥Éưøï oÁuÉ, PÀ®§ÄgÀV f Éè EªÀjUÉ ²¸ÀÄÛ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀªÀÅ «¢ü¹gÀĪÀ DzÉñÀªÀ£ÀÄß gÀzÀÄÝUÉƽ¹zÉ ºÁUÀÆ DgÉÆÃ¥À¢AzÀ zÉÆõÀªÀÄÄPÀÛgÀ£ÁßV ªÀiÁr DzÉò¹zÉ.

PR. 867

PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥Á®gÀ DzÉñÁ£ÀĸÁgÀ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ CªÀgÀ ºÉ Àj£À°è,

eÉ.r. ªÀÄzsÀÄZÀAzÀæ vÉÃd¹é

¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ C¢üãÀ PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð,

M¼ÁqÀ½vÀ E¯ÁSÉ (¥ÉÆ°Ã¸ï ¸ÉêÉUÀ¼ÀÄ).

ªÀÄÄzÀæPÀgÀÄ ºÁUÀÆ ¥ÀæPÁ±ÀPÀgÀÄ:- ¸ÀAPÀ®£Á¢üPÁjUÀ¼ÀÄ, PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, ¸ÀPÁðj PÉÃAzÀæ ªÀÄÄzÀæuÁ®AiÀÄ, ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ-59

R.N.I. No. KARBIL/2001/47147 POSTAL REGN. No. RNP/KA/BGS/2202/2014-16

Licensed to post without prepayment WPP No. 297