Typhoon track errors of KMA Ensemble Prediction System for ... · Typhoon track errors of KMA Ensemble Prediction System for TIGGE in 2011 and 2012 Typhoon track errors of KMA Ensemble

Typhoon track errors of KMA Ensemble Prediction System for TIGGE in 2011 and 2012

Typhoon track errors of KMA Typhoon track errors of KMA Ensemble Prediction System for Ensemble Prediction System for TIGGE in 2011 and 2012TIGGE in 2011 and 2012

SeungSeung--Woo Lee, Juhyung Son, YoungWoo Lee, Juhyung Son, Young--Youn Park, and Hoon ParkYoun Park, and Hoon Park

Numerical Model Development Division, KMANumerical Model Development Division, KMA

IntroductionIntroduction

• The KMA EPS has been run operationally since May 2011 at global domain with N320 resolution (approximately 40 km in mid-latitudes) and 70 vertical levels.

• Total 24 ensemble members including control run and the initial condition perturbations are generated using an Ensemble Transform Kalman Filter.

• The upgraded KMA EPS gives better guidance to forecasters especially in prediction of typhoons.

• In this study, we compare the typhoon tracks from each operational centers participating in the TIGGE project for the year 2011 and 2012.

History of KMA EPSHistory of KMA EPSOperation

period 2001.3.1 - 2003.11.1 - 2006.7.1- 2008.9.1- 2011.3.5- 2012. 6-

Machine 1st (NEC SX5) 2nd (Cray X1E) 3rd (Cray XT6)

Data Asssim 2dOI →3dOI

3dOI →3dVar 3dVar 3dvar(self-

cycle) 4dVar(from global model)

Model GDAPS (JMA GSM) UM(UKMO)

Horizontal Res T106 T213(60km) 40km

Vertical Res 21 30 40 50/70 70

Perturbation method

(Target area)Breeding(Global)

Breeding + Factor Rotation(NH)

ETKF(localized in hor and vert)

ETKFwith SST

perturbation

Model error NO RP, SKEB RP, SKEB2

Run per days 1 (12UTC) 2 (00, 12UTC) 2 (00, 12UTC)

Lead time(days) 10 10 10

Members 16 (16 members + 1 control) (16+1)*2 24

Post Processing NO Bias Correction (Bo Cui) -

Track error in 2011Track error in 2011


1102(SONGDA)1102(SONGDA)

6

Typ. NO. 1102(SONGDA)

Lifetime(UTC) 2011052118~2011052906

Verification [NO. of Init.]

2011052212~2011052812

[13]

1109(MUIFA)1109(MUIFA)

7

Typ. NO. 1109(MUIFA)

Lifetime(UTC) 7.28.06~8.9.00

Verification [NO. of Init.]

7.29.12~8.7.12 [19]

Typhoon list in 2012Typhoon list in 2012

��

1 �� PAKHAR �� 2012.03.29 09:00 2012.04.02 09:00

2 �� SANVU �� 2012.05.22 09:00 2012.05.28 12:00

3 �� MAWAR �� 2012.06.01 15:00 2012.06.06 15:00

4 �� GUCHOL �� 2012.06.12 15:00 2012.06.20 09:00

5 �� TALIM �� 2012.06.18 03:00 2012.06.21 06:00

6 �� DOKSURI �� 2012.06.26 21:00 2012.06.30 09:00

7 �� KHANUN �� 2012.07.16 15:00 2012.07.19 12:00

8 �� VICENTE �� 2012.07.21 21:00 2012.07.25 03:00

9 �� SAOLA �� 2012.07.28 09:00 2012.08.03 15:00

10 �� DAMREY �� 2012.07.28 21:00 2012.08.03 15:00

11 �� HAIKUI �� 2012.08.03 09:00 2012.08.09 21:00

12 �� KIROGI �� 2012.08.08 09:00 2012.08.10 09:00

13 �� KAI-TAK �� 2012.08.13 09:00 2012.08.18 15:00

14 �� TEMBIN �� 2012.08.19 09:00 2012.08.31 00:00

15 �� BOLAVEN �� 2012.08.20 15:00 2012.08.29 06:00

16 �� SANBA �� 2012.09.11 09:00 2012.09.18 09:00

17 �� JELAWAT �� 2012.09.21 03:00 2012.10.01 15:00

18 �� EWINIAR �� 2012.09.24 21:00 2012.09.30 09:00

19 �� MALIKSI �� 2012.10.01 15:00 2012.10.04 15:00

20 �� GAEMI �� 2012.10.01 21:00 2012.10.06 21:00

Typhoons in 2012Typhoons in 2012

SAOLA

Typhoon 2012 best tracks from RSMC

DAMREY

TEMBIN BOLAVEN

SAOLA

DAMREY

TEMBIN

BOLAVEN

Verification methodVerification method

• Position Error [km]

The distance between the best track (from RSMC) and the forecast track.

• Along Track vs. Cross Track bias

Along-track bias : The bias in the direction of TC movement

Cross-track bias : The bias in the rectangular direction of TC movement


Center No. of samples

CMA 122CMC 20

ECMWF 122UKMO 121NCEP 39JMA 122KMA 123


• Along vs. cross track errorFaster

(AT bias)

Slower(AT bias)

Rightward(CT bias)

Leftward(CT bias)


CMA 122CMC 20


Along vs. cross track biasAlong vs. cross track bias

Track error in 2012 Track error in 2012 (same samples)(same samples)

• Same samples for each center Center No. of samples

CMA 39CMC 20


Track error in 2012 Track error in 2012 (same samples)(same samples)


(AT bias)

Slower(AT bias)

Rightward(CT bias)

Leftward(CT bias)


CMA 39CMC 20


Along vs. cross track bias Along vs. cross track bias (same samples)(same samples)

Track error for 4 typhoonsTrack error for 4 typhoons

• 4 typhoons which has a track near KoreaNumber Name

1209 SAOLA1210 DAMREY1214 TEMBIN1215 BOLAVEN

Track error for 4 typhoonsTrack error for 4 typhoons


(AT bias)

Slower(AT bias)

Rightward(CT bias)

Leftward(CT bias)

Number Name

1209 SAOLA1210 DAMREY1214 TEMBIN1215 BOLAVEN

Along vs. cross track bias Along vs. cross track bias (4 typhoons)(4 typhoons)

Track error for BolavenTrack error for Bolaven

• Track error increase largely after 60 hours for KMA eps



(AT bias)

Slower(AT bias)

Rightward(CT bias)

Leftward(CT bias)

Along vs. cross track bias(Bolaven)Along vs. cross track bias(Bolaven)


• Deterministic vs. Ensemble Prediction

EPS Track for BOLAVEN for each CenterEPS Track for BOLAVEN for each Center

BLUE : KMARED : JMAGREEN: ECMWF

Along vs. cross track bias(Bolaven)Along vs. cross track bias(Bolaven)

SummarySummary

• Even though total sample numbers are different for each operational center, ECMWF and NCEP EPS show best performance in typhoon forecast.

• Hybrid 3DVAR/ENKF in NCEP GFS may play an important role in typhoon forecast performance.

• KMA EPS show reduction in track error for 4-typhoons that affect directly compared with whole typhoons in 2012.

• Most of all operation centers predict westward tilted and faster movement compare with analyzed track for typhoon Bolaven.

Thank you for your attention!Thank you for your attention!

Documents

Typhoon track errors of KMA Ensemble Prediction System for ... · Typhoon track errors of KMA Ensemble Prediction System for TIGGE in 2011 and 2012 Typhoon track errors of KMA Ensemble