p- mm -f -,-- ' .'rm

Mining Lands Section

Control Sheet

Pile NO

TYPE OF SURVZ1'

^L GEOLOGICAL

GEOCHEMICAL

EXPENDITURE

MINIclG LANDS COMMENTS:

ii0NEee48 ease DAVIS O10

Signature of Assessor

Date

yjjjj^^&Zi^ ̂-. 'S':Vj; KAj- :--'m^-^'A'-^'--'- - : -' "' - ~

-,-i-: .!fi'c :^'

GEOLOGICAL REPORT

S TOWNSHIPDISTRICT OF SUDBURY ONTARIO

ABSTRACT

Based on earlier results of a geophysical survey, a geological survey was performed on six contiguous mining claims in Davis Township. The survey indicated mineralization occured in the form of Gold, Silver, Colbalt and Hopper in brecciated shear zones previously outlined by geophysical ^nomilies. Detailed mapping and sampling was carried out on favourable showings.

PURPOSE

^o investigate anomiDous electromagnetic and magnetic conductors which were located from previous exploration work; see appendix I geophysical report 1P 04. The ?eolo~ical survev v/as carried out on 400' intervals and detailed work was performed on well mineralized outcrops. The mineralized prospects when identified were sampled randomly and based on results were chip sampled and or trenched.

PROPERTY

The six claims surveyed can be identified as * 02212, r^22 1 3, 6P. 68?21S, 6B2216 and fP22i7. The property is located approxi mately 35 miles north-east of Sudbury and is easily acces sible north of highway l 7 on the Kuka-^ami l^ke ro-Vd. Then ^ miles east on a new access rond, just completed to Groundstar Resources North Star L^ke Mine. The road actually cuts through the property which straddles the south border of the North Stsr Lake Mine.

mhe property is also accessible by bush road vid C3r. highway, north of Hagar or by TN rail east of Sudbury 30 km to the Crerar station.

Holders of the propertv are Mike Palkovits at Box I^TR Banff, Alberta TOL 000 *nd John ^alcone^ Rt f c Capillo Road Elliot Lake, Ontario TC A ?7C .

PROPERTY CONT...

(J-he following is a list of names and or addresses of people who worked on thfr claim group.

John falconer (holde~) Stephen falconer Ores Tucker Isabell Wolfram Mike Palkovits (holder) Frank Palkovits Mark Palkovits Brian Palkovits Rob Palkovits

Elliot Lake, Ontario Blind River, Ontario Elliot Lake, Ontario Elliot. Lake, Ontario Banff, Alberta Sudbury, Ontario Sudbury, Ontario Sudbury, Ontario carson, Ontario

Thorsen, Sam Lees Teck Exploration

GEOLOGY

The property is underlain with interbedded, conglomerate quartzite, argillite and areywackes of the huronian frowsranda formation. The northern half of the property contains inter bedded sediments which trend SO-70 decrees north-east and separate the southerly two claims by the Ess Creek fault. Immediately south of the fault lies a post huronian gabbro sill (Nipissing diabase type).

'Hie area o f interest is the north-east trending sediments .lust north of the ^abbro sill. Here lies shear zones within the sediments th^t seem to co-incide with the geophysical anomilies. Some shear zones are weaklv mineralized with at least two beinc strongly mineralized as indicated by test pits which were exca vated some time ap-o. The best mineralization is found in brecciated shears consisting of pyrite, arsenopyrite, chalco pyrite, erythrite and colbaltite. Random samples were taken ^rom various locations and assayed mainlv for ^old. values ranged from trace - 0.14 oz per ton Au. One such showine referred to as the colbRlt showing is located on the ed^e of a pond between claims { Q 22X and f:'ocri5. ^he outcrop is strongly rusted and is covered with pink colbalt stainintr. Assays returned values of MO ppb. Au., nil A?., 2700 ppm. Cu. and 274 ppm. colbalt over a 2" chip sample. Unfortunatelv the outcrop is heavily covered with overburden.

The two main showings were further investigated by Teck Explorations with results as shown on appendix I I and in. Here mineraliza tion occured in localized shear zones within a cherty brecciated sediment. ^he best result was a ^' chip sample assaying 0.10 oz per ton Au. from the main trench.

CONT... /3

The two most southerly claims 63221? and 6P2217 are least interesting thus are mainly covered by a gabbro sill with small sulphines being found along small Quartz stringers in very small shear zones.

CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Based on the two surveys completed to date, that being the geological and geophysical survey, it is thought that the economic potential of the property is limited. It appears that most geophysical targets can be explained by geological contacts and or local shears within the metasediment^. The shear zones thus occupy ins: mineralization in the form of gold, copper and colbalt. Topographic conditions that being overbur den and water prevent a thorough deliniation of most mineralized showings. At this tine it seems premature to outline drill targets due to the sporadic nature of the mineralized prospects and heavy soil covered outcrops. Possibly at depth these shear zones could pinch and swell thus opening extensions of unlimi ted strike potential because of the bedded sediments. Accordingly it is recommended that a geochemical survey be initiated on the claim group which lies north of the Ess Creek fault and occupies the north east trendine sediments. Furthermore if results prove interesting a trenching and stripping program should be performed, followed by diamond drilling if necessary.

Respectfully submitted,

Jdhn D.

W 5

7/v.e

r/y/sx?

S r^^ 5

z si r*/ c AS' .

S"/^ (iii/ tfJS. ^.f.'/O-C/^^

M/JCE

Bex

/S A J. t s r

'J&Q&V

M

pAU/COU/rS -

J2.05

Ft.*, i or

AUfi

M

i j

i i

i i

t l

T UK.

V' OAJ ~AAl D P 3A

T D-

MATS

S .

y XS

- 7 c-5 a UT*/ .e^ t-

/4/U/)

S -

FAST- tue&r au* z

cv2S -*i

5~SX S)ASS)

g x c. E f r

c x

c 2.

/.I/HA/ MAP

c o vdvc.ro ̂ /s -sec

A

/H .

a us rg use/tx:s 5

g X /* L -C

w / 'B

"7/V/Z /S /l

/S

/i s

o . THE

/5

A&cor 2 sotAJlTl-t

tv/Tl"

- t C C

/s Adour

s AS sfeAAJAf&s /^j/f/ Zee ~ s 've c 6*) M MS) z ?*''Vr /t

/s s) 4 s

E Fi i C S

1 S"O

l "t ; : &.T.

*,'V::''

"ft 1":

e/3

/S

/t 5 S? S

- /fslsr T

O^es^fcTVU^

'- ,'fC^

l

OS2:f 31WOS

NIVW

J.OO

'A J 5V

i K w wit*

9j*r?v*jr"W v ti

8 1

LI

*l l

Si

4 f

- - ' \

OS Z

•oyOI'O -\ \

\ \81

•~4l112,

OS

SHOWING CLAIM * 682213

-" -'af^'f

to

lil J/--/

SCALE 1:20 000

GRID ZONE-irr\Y L ^r-T Vi CxX/r^ ~~ -" :~v !~~ ^-.-~"- : -ss-.-.- .-*-- -..., MM l | ^,———————^———————.—————.————— ' - ' J^ ^ -" ' '"^ j"" * ' ** . ^* "- ' "••*P ———— " J^'::"* -i_______ t **" *

- Ai!.7---'~rv- - "'"*.."i ""L-".""- ! u."^" "j~:,1T ~ L,L~ "-*~J 1,- -7 - - r T^'^'r^"— "~-^-^-—-^l-^-i. .L "17 " ^' - ' "- , - - 7 7 7' - ;f ,- - V^?*\.

" '" --;"^^r :* ' -l^S ~'' ""•'"'"""1- '~-*. 7 ^ ' ~ ~ ^ . ^ .' v^ j^ 1 "CJr^^N— ",' ' vi, ? l C~' ! ",—^ /*^\ y :Xi.**'"* * ~ ~ -^ ' ~ -"~- — " ',. '* '*' , ^T, ~. ^--'-T^ ^ ^~^.~~- ~-i ' ' - -*'" -' " .z -- v- - ' . —— '

' ~*L ^^^ f "V"7^;"0*-" ! *""- !*X.i. "7"":^" '^5^ ' '' ,'~ " -~ "\~^ '----——J ""

. ,* x-I'*^" ^ -ft-—-" ~^•*w ^.

2^- " '-*-' *" "

:^.. r-- : LOUGHRIN TWR,-] 7.; -^'^-^'. 7 i..,-. -.5. i 7 7 , 7 .T l . 7. i7 ;7- :'v^——.j^f ' '-'*- -̂ .'- . -. - •'.;-\ -\-,\.-. .' ' -y 1.1.-;; Vi.-V

nlark)

Ministry of Northern Affair* and' ^

Report of Work(Geophysical, Geological, Geochemical and Expenditures)

Mining Actypeof Surveyd)

i 6 eoLo(*i.lalm HoJdtrd)

/*ll^. ?

Imtrudloni: ~ Pltait typa or print.- If number of mining ctairrn travtritd

txcttdi ipac* on thli form, attach a Hit. Nota: — Only dayi crtditt calculated in tht

"Exptndlturti" it ci Ion may b* enttred In th* "Expend. Dayi Cr." columni.

— Oo not ut* itadftd artat below.Townihlp or Ara*

\ddrtll

, urvty Company

. ,. / MM*^" " "~~ "~'~ ' —— -...— p.———.-

Data o' Survay (from 4 to)

••m* tnd AddrMI of Author (of O to-Tcchnicat r iport[

Total'MiltTof" line Cut*

P5A'edits Requested per Each Claim in Column; at ri

E- ' . t

gh*paclal Provliloni

For firn turvty:i Enttr 40 dayi. (Thij

Includtt lint cutting)

For each additional turvty: uiing tht lam* grid:

Enttr 20 day* (for tach)

4an Dayi

Compltt* revtrt* tidt and tnttr totalli) hart

'•irbornt Craditi

Nott: Special provltioni crtditi do not apply 10 Airborne Survtyi.

Oaophyilcal

' Electromagnetic

. Magnetometer

- Radiometric

- Other

Oeologlcel

Ceochemlcal

Oaophyilcal

- Elactromajnailc

- Mtgnatomeler

- Radiometric

- Other

Oeologlcal

Oeochamlcal

Electromagnetic

Magnetometer

Radiometric

Oayi perClaim

40

Dayi per Claim

—————

Dayi per Oalm

————— .

Mining Claims Traversed (List in numerical sequence)

i xpenditures (excludes power stripping)lypa of Work Parformad

rarformad on CUimU)

'.s

' ikulatlon ot Expandliura Oayi Cf*dlli

' Total ExpandituraiToitl

Oayt Cradlii

j: nitrueiionil Total Oayi Craditi may ba apportlonad al tha claim holdar't j choice. Entar numbar o) day) cradlll par claim lalaclad : In columni at right.

dad HATfear or AMni (Slgnatu'a)

('cftjfication Verifying Report of VVork

Mining Claim Praflx "f"" N urr,bJ7

Total numbar of mining clalmi covarad by thli raport of work.

i MI i.i i i. i i, - i, i i . , m ———————————————————r———-——-y———————-r-w——-————-—— ' '

l hiraby c*rlify that l ha* a ptrtonal and intlmati knowddg* of Ih* facli let/O'th In th* flapofl of Work ann*itcNj*r*X hiving p*Vorm*d Ih* work ! or witnttitd itmt during and/or after ill complltion and Ih* annexed npor/i [nit.j mm* and Poital Addreil Ol Perion Certifying

•f •'•;'3f h---:,::-:raH

•- - ' -' ' V p - V f-MS

:^M:^^ii ^^ifcllilSi

^.•l\;^':^:,\^r^: -Tf^:..;.V^^:5? '^/.;^;-.v,^;:^iv*j

ffiSSlSM

^ri 1 .

j'*tf4r e:fi

* ^.* Q-ZAPl *^- - -i — ~" ~*^*- A

l A -t. ' J wM^WUrt*-^

- r-. y\ Aztnu'E C^Qi..*-i ftp- ZWVA/t&Pi

*ut? j #*4it-L,re

ourciioP

or JUwK OOTCAOP c-it OUTCROP

GEOLOGICAL

TVPE

O

FAUL.T

1-REMCM OR TEST PIT

TREE.

POST

75 50 25 O 25 50 75 V-*- .M,,,. h l .M M l

SCALE

41 lI0NE0048 0060 DAVIS 200

NO REVISION BY DATE

EOLO(2?'Y p/lLKOViTSAtCONER. P*0PE*TY

TITLE

DAVIS W RDRW JOHN

CHECK'D:

APPR D:

DATE. NOV S, 1165

DATE ia

SCALB. [cm. -- 25

DRAWING NO.

SHT NO