Upload
danesh-mazloomdoost
View
156
Download
2
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Problem: Objectifying a Subjective Problem (Pain)
• Pain is costly – Lost productivity due to pain in 2010: $297.4
to $335.5 billion1
• Pain is complex – Numerous, overlapping causes (muscles,
joints, discs, nerves, etc)
• Pain is subjective – Limited metrics for treatment outcomes
– Recall bias & placebo effect further complicate outcome metrics
1. Institute of Medicine of the National Academies Report. Relieving Pain in America: A Blueprint for Transforming Prevention, Care, Education, and Research, 2011. The National Academies Press, Washington DC. (page 260)
Identifying the Cause & Effect
• Due to its subjectivity, Cause & Effect relationships difficult to establish in Pain Management
• Thus, no gold standards exists
– Variable treatment algorithm (chiropractor, PT, surgery, minimially invasive procedures, etc)
– Wide geographic variability
Purpose
• To Improve quality of outcome-measures in a subjective arena – “Did this procedure help”
– “Are we closer to diagnosing the source of pain?”
– “What options exist for the cure?”
• To reduce hindsight bias – Real-time inquiry of outcome vs 3-4 week
follow-up
– Quantifiable metrics
Design
SMS initiation with mobile web link – HIPAA Compliant
• Initiated with text reminders without PHI • Linked to website with post-procedure inquiries &
reminders
– Patient Feedback • Inquire about procedure outcomes • Directed responses in real-time vs query pain
score weeks later in follow-up
– Automated Responses • Decision tree algorithms • Practice-defined questions & response; real-time
customizability
Usability
• Procedure Rule Entry System add-on
• Practice defines templates for
– Questions
– Timing posted
– Responses & algorithm for follow-up questions
Development Stage
• Idea Complete
• Algorithm Complete
• Code Complete 02/09/13
• Integrate w/ Allscripts 02/23/13
• Testing phase 03/01/13
Integration
• Interface with Allscripts
– Customizable within Allscripts Clinical Customization Screen
• Data Domains
– Local Fax Server
– Central Web Domain Server with HTTPS
– Local Allscripts SQL database & TxT-Rx SQL database housed on local server
Market Plan
• Geographic prevalence of Allscripts – >200 PRO-EHR sites in local region
• Beta testing – Local geographic market – Small clinic (< 3 physicians, 1-2 specialty) – 10 free beta clients
• Data collection & outcome evaluation on beta – Change in cancellations – Quality of data collected
Market Plan
• Price point: Allscripts Pro – $1500 for license & training (conducted
online) – Maintenance:
• Option 1: Ad-based revenue • Option 2: $200 per physician per year
– Cost of hardware: • With Fujitsu fax server $400 • Without Fujitsu Fax server $4000
• Price point: Allscripts Enterprise – Pending outcome of Beta evaluation
Advantages of System
• Increases patient compliance & participation in care
• Customizable – Practice determines use of data
• Forward to insurance • Internal review of treatment protocols • Research
• High-cost Alternatives: – Human interface (staff calls & record-keeping) – Follow-up visits (recall bias, poor quality data)
• Accommodate changing medical market – Consumer desire for interactivity – Accountable Care Organizations & quality reporting