Upload
santiago-fender
View
215
Download
3
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Two-parameter Magnitude System for Small Bodies
Kuliah AS8140 & AS3141(Fisika) Benda Kecil [dalam] Tata Surya
Prodi Astronomi 2006/2007
Observing Plane
• The plane Sun-Object-Observer is the plane of light scattering of the radiating reaching us from the Sun via the object.
• It is a symmetry-breaking plane, and because of this, makes the light from the object polarized
Karttunen et al. 1987
Albedo & Phase Function (1)
phase angle, = (2 ) scattering angle, (solar) elongation
Sun
de Pater & Lissauer 2001
Albedo & Phase Function (3)
A solar system body radiated by the Sun: 4
2)1()1(
4
1TA
r
FA IR
SunV
FSun = 1.36103 W m-2 is the solar constant at 1 AU,r is heliocentric distance in AU,For a black body albedo AV = AIR = 0
Assuming isotropic thermal emission (not quite true!)
when observing a target …
Data: Vobs V(r ;, ), dVobs
Brightness at unique distances [r,] and phase angle ()
Vobs should be a magnitude at base-level lightcurve
Sometimes V(r ;, ) V() Vobs()
Data set: exp. per dayTime: ti ; i = 1,…,n
Magnitude at base-level: V(ri ;i, i) ; i = 1,…,n
Magnitude error: i ; i = 1,…,n
The Two Parameters: H & G (1)
Reduced magnitude ) log( 5) ,; (),1( rrVV obs
Vobs is observed magnitude
Absolute magnitude is the magnitude of a body if it is at a distance 1 AU from Earth and Sun at phase angle = 0
HHV V )0 ,1( Standard visual
Two-parameter (HG) magnitude system:
)()()1( log 5.2)(),1( 21 GGHHV G is the slope parameter the gradient of the phase curve
Bowell et al. 1989 (Asteroids II)
The Two Parameters: H & G (2)
Phase function l(); for 0 120, 0 G 1
2tan 56.90exp)(
2 ,1 );( )(1)()()(
2
W
lWW lLlSl
lB
llL
llS
A
C
2 tan exp)(
sin 754.0sin 341.1119.0
sin1)(
2
238.0 ,986.0
,218.1 ,631.0
,862.1 ,332.3
21
21
21
CC
BB
AA
Simpler, more symmetric, but slightly less accurate expression
2 ,1 ;2
tan exp)(
lA
lB
ll
22.1 ,63.0
,87.1 ,33.3
21
21
BB
AA
Bowell et al. 1989 (Asteroids II)
Obtaining H & G (1)
Observation ( reduced mag) data Vi(i) and errors i)()(10 2211
)(4.0ii
V aaii
Least-squares solution
2122211
2
2
)(4.0
2 ,1 ;,,1 ; )(
2 ,1, ;,,1 ;)( )(
,,1 ;10
hhhD
jniI
g
kjnih
niI
i
iijj
i
ikijjk
Vi
ii
Dghgha
Dghgha
/)(
/)(
1122112
2121221
Buktikan…
Bowell et al. 1989 (Asteroids II)
Obtaining H & G (2)
a1 and a2 are of order 10-0.4H, which may be computationally inconvenient. If so, they may be scaled to order unity by setting
)()( log 5.2)( 2211 aamH m is one of the reduced magnitude Vi(i) (for instance at smallest )
21
2
21 log 5.2
aa
aG
aaH
Thus,
albedo high for 400
albedo moderate for 25.0
albedolow for 15.0
.
G
Bowell et al. 1989 (Asteroids II)
Phase integral q = 0.290 + 0.684 G
H & G Error Analysis
Magnitude residuals )()()1( log 5.2)(
)()(
21 iii
iiii
GGm
mHVr
m(i) is the calculated magnitude drop from zero phase angle
Then,
;/2
1 ;
/1/
1
;/1
1 ;
/1
/
2222
022
2
22
)(2
2
0 0
iiiii
iH
i
ii
rn
s
20
20
2
2
)(0
)()( ),1()(
; 0615.0 1132.00673.0
; ; )(0
HVH
GGG
ssH H
Bowell et al. 1989 (Asteroids II)
Drawbacks…
The H,G-magnitude system fails to fit the narrow opposition effects of E-class asteroids (Harris et al. 1986)
It shows poor fits to the phase curves of certain dark asteroids (e.g., Piiroen et al. 1994, Shevchenko et al. 1996)
Hapke’s photometric model (5 parameters) has photometric fits as good as the H,G-magnitude system (Verbiscer & Veverka 1995)
Lightcurve Amplitude – Phase Angle Relation
A(0°) and A() are, respectively, the lightcurve amplitude at zero phase angle and that at a phase angle
Amplitude at zero phase angle is smaller than that at a phase angle
1
)()0(
AA
type-M for deg 0130
type-C for deg 015.0
type-S for deg 030.0
1-
1-
-1
.
Zappala et al. (1990)
a b
c
)0( 4.0 log10A
b
a