Tweeter Case Analysis

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/28/2019 Tweeter Case Analysis

    1/14

    Submitted ByGroup 10, Section A

    Anshu KumarNakul Gola

    Nikhil SharmaNishad N

    Sudeep Mohan M

    Yadav Rahul Radhakishan

    Pricing Policy

  • 7/28/2019 Tweeter Case Analysis

    2/14

    Objective Price Competitiveness:

    Mean Product Price

    0

    100

    200

    300

    400

    500

    600

    700

    800900

    1000

    CCTV Multiple CD

    players

    Cam corders Stereo

    speakers

    Price

    Mean Product Price

    Lechmere

    Circuit City

    The wizTweeter

  • 7/28/2019 Tweeter Case Analysis

    3/14

    Mean product prices are higher by 15-27% for 27 TVs and

    Camcorders, by 65% for CD players and by 125% for Stereospeakers.

    Reason for these high prices is that Tweeter does not carryentry level products which are lesser in price.

    Higher mean prices do not imply lower price competitivenessfor Tweeter because it offers high quality products.

    Also its promotion of high-end, high quality products create apicture of premium shop. And the high quality service offeredwas believed to be a factor of cost

    But the 15% to 125% price premium does have an impact onTweeters price image

    Objective Price Competitiveness:

    Mean Product Price

  • 7/28/2019 Tweeter Case Analysis

    4/14

    Mean product price for

    overlapping products

    10 or 35%

    5 or 25%

    9 or 47%

    3 or 18%

    4 or 20%

    4 or 19%

    11 or 37% 11 or 23%

    8 or 28%

    0 0

    1 or 10%

    $0.00

    $100.00

    $200.00

    $300.00

    $400.00

    $500.00

    $600.00

    $700.00

    $800.00

    $900.00

    $1,000.00

    Lechmere

    CircuitCity

    TheWiz

    Lechmere

    CircuitCity

    TheWiz

    Lechmere

    CircuitCity

    TheWiz

    Lechmere

    CircuitCity

    TheWiz

    COLOR TV CD PLAYER CAMCORDER Stereo Speakers

    CompetitorsMean price

    TweetersMean price

    * Numbers on the bar represent the no. of overlapping models. Read as Lechimore and Tweeter have 10 models ofColor TV in common or 35% of Lechimore TV models match with Tweeter

  • 7/28/2019 Tweeter Case Analysis

    5/14

    Mean product price for

    overlapping products

    Lechmere Circuit City The WizCompetitors Mean price $675.00 $552.00 $666.00

    Tweeters Mean price $668.00 $566.00 $676.00No. of Overlapping models 10 5 9

    Lechmere Circuit City The WizCompetitors Mean price $193.00 $256.00 $215.00

    Tweeters Mean price $180.00 $257.00 $200.00No. of Overlapping models 3 4 4

    CD Players (Tweeter carries 20 Models: 7 overlap and 13 are unique to Tweeter)

    Color TVs (Tweeter carries 14 Models: 11 overlap and 3 are unique to Tweeter)

  • 7/28/2019 Tweeter Case Analysis

    6/14

    Mean product price for

    overlapping products

    Lechmere Circuit City The WizCompetitors Mean price $893.00 $875.00 $805.00

    Tweeters Mean price $895.00 $877.00 $806.00No. of Overlapping models 11 11 8

    Lechmere Circuit City The WizCompetitors Mean price N/A N/A $215.00

    Tweeters Mean price N/A N/A $200.00No. of Overlapping models 0 0 1

    Stereo Speakers (Tweeter carries 23 Models: 1 overlap and 22 are unique to Tweeter)

    Camcorder (Tweeter carries 13 Models: 12 overlap and 1 are unique to Tweeter)

  • 7/28/2019 Tweeter Case Analysis

    7/14

    Subjective Price Competitiveness

    TweetersPrice

    Image

    LimitedAdvertising

    Past PriceImage

    SmallUpscaleStores

    High End

    Products

    APP

    EverydayFair Price

  • 7/28/2019 Tweeter Case Analysis

    8/14

    Considering only the overlapping products it can be seen that

    difference between Tweeter's prices and its competitors is notvey much

    But as tweeter stocks medium to high end products which areprice higher than its competitors entry level products, it isperceived as high priced by the consumers

    Print advertising is also not giving the correct picture of the

    prices There is a misconception by the consumers as they attribute the

    excellent service of the Tweeter coming with a higher price

    Subjective Price Competitiveness

  • 7/28/2019 Tweeter Case Analysis

    9/14

    Eliminatingneed forextensive

    price basedresearch

    Breaking

    sale seasonbuyingmentality

    Converting

    free ridingor potentialcustomers

    Smoothensdemand

    over time

    Introduction of APP for

    Customer Acquisition

    APP helped ineliminating the needfor potential or free-riding customers to goto another store insearch of lower prices

    Under APP, consumershave less incentives to

    wait, hence breakingsale season buyingmentality.

    Consumers indicatedthat if price were not

    an issue, they wouldprefer to buy atTweeter.

    APP eliminates the

    cyclical buyingpatterns of sale-basedretailing and

    smoothens demand.

    Besides this, APP creates positive word of mouth which has a hugeimpact on buying behavior

  • 7/28/2019 Tweeter Case Analysis

    10/14

    Effectiveness of APP

    0.00%

    10.00%

    20.00%

    30.00%40.00%

    50.00%

    60.00%

    Lower Aboutthe

    same

    Higher Don'tknow

    Respondersunaware ofTweeters APP

    Responders awareof Tweeters APP

    People aware of Tweeters APP policy showed better knowledge

    of the prices of APP

  • 7/28/2019 Tweeter Case Analysis

    11/14

    MarketingMix

    ActivitiesLower Prices

    ProductUniqueness

    Managementof Product

    Overlap

    Effectiveness of APP :

    Necessary FactorsPricing strategy must becoordinated with other

    marketing mixActivities

    Tweeters customers paylower prices for products

    that overlap with itscompetitors

    Sufficient overlap tomake APP a crediblepromotional strategy inthe eyes of the consumers.

    Sufficient productuniqueness to generate

    overall customer marginsnecessary to maintain the

    business

  • 7/28/2019 Tweeter Case Analysis

    12/14

    Effectiveness of APP :

    Financial Impact

    0

    10000

    20000

    30000

    40000

    50000

    60000

    70000

    80000

    90000

    1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996

    Industry salesin million dollars

    Tweeters salesin (1000$)

    CAGR of 23.52%

    from 1993 to 1996

    CAGR of 5.4% from

    1993 to 1996

  • 7/28/2019 Tweeter Case Analysis

    13/14

    There is clear indication of increase in sales from 1993 to 1996

    with sales showing a year on year increase of 23.52% ascompared to industry standards of 5.4%

    Increase of market share from 2.8% in 1992 to 3.6% in 1996(Exhibit 5)

    Increase in Net income from -$661K to $3600K

    Effectiveness of APP :

    Financial Impact

  • 7/28/2019 Tweeter Case Analysis

    14/14

    Sustainability of APP

    APP eliminates theprice based searchingbehavior. Also ithelps in reducing

    promotion cost

    APP eliminates thecyclical buyingpatterns of sale-basedretailing and leads to

    a more sustainablemodel bysmoothening demand

    Implementation ofAPP would lead tochange in customersperception ofTweeters product

    being high priced andwould lead to asustainable change inthe buying behaviorof customers

    Competitors wouldnot benefit much ifthey implement APPthey have either verylow product overlap

    (CambridgeSoundwork) or verylow productuniqueness

    Imitabilityby

    Competitors

    Change inPrice

    Perception

    Conversionof free riding

    customers

    Eliminationof cyclical

    buyingbehavior