Upload
kalia-houston
View
32
Download
3
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
TV3 Science Team Cast of “Characters”. QuickLook Operators: Elizabeth Barker Misty Cracraft Bryan Hilbert Sherrie Holfeltz Diane Karakla Jessica Kim Kevin Lindsay Doug Long Ray Lucas Jennifer Mack Helen McLaughlin Cheryl Pavlovsky Brittany Shaw Ed Smith Megan Sosey Alex Viana. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
TIPS May 22, 2008 1H. Bushouse
TIPS May 22, 2008 2H. Bushouse
TV3 Science TeamCast of “Characters”
• Instrument Scientists:–Sylvia Baggett
–Howard Bond
–Tom Brown
–Howard Bushouse
–Susana Deustua
–Linda Dressel
–George Hartig
–Bob Hill (GSFC)
–Randy Kimble (GSFC)
–John MacKenty
–Andre’ Martel
–Peter McCullough
–Larry Petro
–Steven Rinehart (GSFC)
• QuickLook Operators:–Elizabeth Barker–Misty Cracraft–Bryan Hilbert–Sherrie Holfeltz–Diane Karakla–Jessica Kim–Kevin Lindsay–Doug Long–Ray Lucas–Jennifer Mack–Helen McLaughlin–Cheryl Pavlovsky–Brittany Shaw–Ed Smith–Megan Sosey–Alex Viana
• WFC3 Operations:–Tom Wheeler
TIPS May 22, 2008 3H. Bushouse
High-Level Statistics
• Total of 743 hours (31 days) on Science Calibration activities– Initial ambient calibrations: Feb. 20 – 29
– Vacuum calibrations: Mar. 4 – Apr. 16
– Final ambient calibrations: Apr. 18 – 21
• 188 hours (8 days) spent on unplanned investigations– UVIS window droplets
– IR FPA persistence
– IR bias jumps (“banding”)
– UVIS PSF short-term stability (shutter-induced jitter)
– UVIS electronic crosstalk linearity
• 555 hours (23 days) spent on original 20-day Science Calibration plan activities (15% overrun)
• ~ 265 SMS runs; 10,605 exposures; ~25 lbs of M&M’s
TIPS May 22, 2008 4H. Bushouse
Objectives Met
• Calibrate all WFC3 science modes Obtain all data necessary to support on-orbit science operations and data
calibration using UVIS-1’ and IR-4 detectors UVIS & IR detector calibrations: bias, dark, flat field, read noise, gain,
linearity, full-well, fringing, … System-level calibrations: system, filter, & grism throughputs
• Verify system-level performance Optical alignment, image quality, photometric stability, scattered light,
internal cal system performance Effects of input voltage and thermal cycling on calibrations Verify instrument performance model (Exposure Time Calculators)
• CEI spec and lien verifications, where possible
TIPS May 22, 2008 5H. Bushouse
Accomplishments
• All tests in original 20-day calibration plan accomplished
• No tests or calibrations deferred to SMOV
TIPS May 22, 2008 6H. Bushouse
Sci Cal Tests Completed
Servicing Mission Aliveness/Functional Test
UVIS & IR Optical Alignment
UVIS & IR Science Monitors
IR Darks (read noise)
IR Background Levels vs. Filter
IR FPA Gain
IR FPA Linearity (full-well)
IR Optical Performance (Encircled Energy)
IR Throughput
IR Filter Blue Leaks
IR External & Internal Flat Fields
IR Flat Field Stability
IR Grism Narrowband Flat Fields
IR Grism Flux Calibration (throughput)
IR Grism Dispersion & Spectral Trace
IR FPA Edge and Baffle Scattered Light
IR Photometric Stability
IR Electronic Crosstalk
IR Bias/Dark vs. Orbit Cycling
IR Rate Dependent QE
IR Intrapixel Sensitivity
IR Persistence
UVIS Bias (read noise)
UVIS Darks
UVIS CCD Gain
UVIS Linearity (full-well)
UVIS Optical Performance (Encircled Energy)
UVIS System Throughput
UVIS Filter Throughput
UVIS CCD Red Cutoff
UVIS Filter Red Leaks
UVIS External & Internal Flat Fields
TIPS May 22, 2008 7H. Bushouse
Sci Cal Tests Completed (2)
UVIS Flat Field Stability
UVIS Grism Narrowband Flat Fields
UVIS Grism Flux Calibration (throughput)
UVIS Grism Dispersion & Spectral Trace
UVIS CCD Fringing
UVIS Glint
UVIS Electronic Crosstalk
UVIS Filter Wedge
UVIS CTE EPER Flat Fields
Unplanned tests:
IR Bias Jump Monitor
UVIS Window Droplet Investigations
UVIS PSF Stability (shutter-induced jitter)
UV Quantum Yield Measurements
UVIS CCD Amplifier “smearing” check
TIPS May 22, 2008 8H. Bushouse
UVIS CCD Characteristics
• Read noise: 3.0–3.3 e- rms• Dark current: <1 e-/pix/hour• Full-well: 70-85k e-
• All consistent with TV1 results using detector with same CCD chips
TIPS May 22, 2008 9H. Bushouse
UVIS Flat Fields
F275W
F555W
F814W
15% structure
7% structure59 of 66 filters have total of 120ke- in flats (0.3%)7 (all narrow quads) have 40-80ke- (0.4-0.5%)
TIPS May 22, 2008 10H. Bushouse
IR FPA Characteristics
• Read noise in a CDS difference image: ~22 e-/pix rms– Averages down to ~14 e- over 16 samples
Dark current: ~0.05 e-/pix/sec
• Linearity: 5% at ~72k e-
– Hard saturation at ~84k e-
TIPS May 22, 2008 11H. Bushouse
IR Flat Fields
“Death Star” “Wagon Wheel”35-40% structure
>200k e- in all IR flats (~0.2%)
TIPS May 22, 2008 12H. Bushouse
Orbital Cycling
• Vary thermal environment and WFC3 input voltage to simulate orbital cycles
• Check IR FPA temperature and bias stability
Temp stable to ~0.6 K
TIPS May 22, 2008 13H. Bushouse
Open Issues/Studies
• UVIS “bowtie” feature
• UVIS shutter-induced image jitter
• IR image persistence
• Launch on Side 1 or 2?– Intermittent IR bias jumps seen on Side 1
– UVIS shutter jitter somewhat worse on Side 2
TIPS May 22, 2008 14H. Bushouse
UVIS “Bowtie”
• Regions of enhanced brightness occasionally seen in darks and flats
• Example here is at strongest level yet seen (5% UV flatfield enhancement in the bowtie and in the location of two alignment spots)
• Typical levels are much less (0.5-1%)
TIPS May 22, 2008 15H. Bushouse
Bowtie Investigation
• Physical mechanism not understood; there appears to be both a persistence and a QE hysteresis phenomenon at work
• Physical morphology is suggestive of a charging effect (electrical field “pincushion” morphology)
• The DCL has never seen this behavior in testing of e2v devices, yet it has been seen with UVIS-1, UVIS-2, and UVIS-1’ in WFC3
• Science team is surveying all biases, darks, and flats from T/V-1, TV-2, and TV-3 to identify all examples and search for trends, correlations
• Seems to occur most often in images taken in ambient (CCD’s warmer than flight), or soon after detector cooldown, but not always
• The clear CCD-level symmetry naturally suggests a CCD-level cause – no upstream sources (optics, stray light, CASTLE illumination) know anything about the split focal plane
• The problem does not arise in the readout electronics (not present in the overscan; readout wouldn’t know about alignment spots)
TIPS May 22, 2008 16H. Bushouse
UVIS Shutter-Induced Image Jitter
• Series of short (1 sec) exposures shows lower peak pixel fraction and larger PSF width in alternating images, while total flux is constant
• Phase of alternating behavior correlates with phase of the 2-blade shutter mechanism
• For exposures >5-10s, no significant effects are seen
TIPS May 22, 2008 17H. Bushouse
Effects Are Strongest In Short Exposures and Small Apertures
• Theory: motion of shutter induces mechanical jitter in the instrument that slightly blurs short exposures; the element most likely affected is the UVM1 mirror (<1 arcsec of rotation of that optic is required to produce the effects observed)
• Possible changes to shutter operations (starting position, encoder feedback, etc) under investigation
EE (diameter in arcsec)
TIPS May 22, 2008 18H. Bushouse
IR Image Persistence
• Initial test using 0.5x-100x full-well sources showed negative persistence (essentially negative dark current); never seen in DCL tests
• Severe over-illumination had occurred due to ground test equipment
• Reran with modified techniques, which showed normal positive persistence, and was (as expected) very low for the sub-full-well exposures
• Target brightness constraint for IR channel could result, though the strong preference is to avoid this; perhaps at least an alert to observers as to the potential effects of very bright objects in their target fields
TIPS May 22, 2008 19H. Bushouse
IR Bias Jumps: Gone but not forgotten
• Low-level bias shift (~2.5DN) was seen intermittently only in lower left quadrant of readout; effect is tracked by the reference pixels in those rows
• Only seen with Side 1 electronics
• Initial rate of occurrence: ~4.5% of all reads
• After March 19: zero in >3000 reads
TIPS May 22, 2008 20H. Bushouse
Results & Remaining Work
• ISR 2008-05 “IR Channel Blue Leaks”, T. Brown
• ISR 2008-06 “IR Channel Baffle Scatter”, T. Brown
• ISR 2008-07 “UVIS Channel Glints”, T. Brown
• ISR 2008-08 “UVIS Filtered Throughput”, T. Brown
• ISR 2008-09 “IR Channel Throughput”, T. Brown
Finish TV3 analysis and delivery of calibration reference files by end of July