51
1 A comparative study of women’s right to access customary land in Zambia and Zimbabwe Tutsirai Patricia Makuvachuma Student number: u11260476 Supervisor: Professor M Hansungule A dissertation submitted to Centre for Human Rights, Faculty of Law, University of Pretoria

Tutsirai Patricia Makuvachuma LLB Dissertation

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Tutsirai Patricia Makuvachuma LLB Dissertation

1

A comparative study of women’s

right to access customary land in

Zambia and Zimbabwe

Tutsirai Patricia Makuvachuma

Student number: u11260476

Supervisor: Professor M Hansungule

A dissertation submitted to Centre for Human Rights, Faculty of

Law, University of Pretoria

Page 2: Tutsirai Patricia Makuvachuma LLB Dissertation

2

Contents A comparative study of women’s right to access customary land in Zambia and Zimbabwe ................ 5

Chapter 1 ................................................................................................................................................. 5

1. Research .......................................................................................................................................... 5

2. Assumptions .................................................................................................................................... 5

3. Research .......................................................................................................................................... 6

4. Motivation ....................................................................................................................................... 6

4.1 History of Land in Zimbabwe ........................................................................................................ 6

4.2 History of Land in Zambia ................................................................................................................. 7

4.3 Inheritance and Women’s Constraints ............................................................................................. 8

4.5 The Legal Framework Administrating Women’s Land Rights ........................................................... 8

International law ..................................................................................................................................... 8

National legislation ................................................................................................................................. 9

4.5 Problems Associated with Women’s Control and Access to Land .................................................. 10

5. Methodology and approach ......................................................................................................... 10

6. Limitations of study....................................................................................................................... 10

7. Chapter Outline ............................................................................................................................. 11

Chapter 1 .............................................................................................................................................. 11

1. Research problem ......................................................................................................................... 11

2. Assumptions .................................................................................................................................. 11

3. Research Questions ...................................................................................................................... 11

4. Motivation ..................................................................................................................................... 11

4.1 History of land in Zimbabwe ..................................................................................................... 11

4.2 History of land in Zambia .......................................................................................................... 11

4.3 Inheritance and Women’s constraints ...................................................................................... 11

4.4 Legal framework administering women’s land rights ............................................................... 11

4.5 Problems associated with women’s control and access to land. ............................................. 11

5. Methodology and approach ......................................................................................................... 11

6. Limitations of study....................................................................................................................... 11

7. Chapter Outline ............................................................................................................................. 11

Chapter 2: Gendered Perspectives on Women’s Land Rights ............................................................ 11

1. Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 11

2. The Effect of Patriarchy in an African Context .............................................................................. 11

3. Defining Access to Land ................................................................................................................ 11

Page 3: Tutsirai Patricia Makuvachuma LLB Dissertation

3

4. Ecofeminism .................................................................................................................................. 11

5. Role of Gender .............................................................................................................................. 11

6. African Feminism and Customary law .......................................................................................... 11

7. The Dichotomy between ‘Rights’ and ‘Customs’ .......................................................................... 11

8. Conclusion ..................................................................................................................................... 11

Chapter 3: Land Tenure Systems in Zambia and Zimbabwe ............................................................... 11

1. Distribution of Land in Zimbabwe ................................................................................................. 11

2. Background to the Land Tenure in Zambia ................................................................................... 11

3. Gender in Multiple Customary Land Functions ............................................................................ 11

4. Utilisation of Customary Law and Inheritance Laws ..................................................................... 11

5. Women in Zimbabwe Today ......................................................................................................... 12

6. Conclusion ..................................................................................................................................... 12

Chapter 4: International, Regional and Domestic Legal Framework .................................................. 12

1. Introduction: Is There a Right to Land? ........................................................................................ 12

2. International Law .......................................................................................................................... 12

3. Regional Law ................................................................................................................................. 12

3.1 Protocol to the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights on the Rights of Women in Africa

(the Protocol) ........................................................................................................................................ 12

3.2 Southern African Development Community Protocol on Gender and Development .................... 12

4. Domestic Laws .............................................................................................................................. 12

4.1 Constitution of Zambia ................................................................................................................... 12

4.2 Constitution of Zimbabwe .............................................................................................................. 12

5. Conclusion ..................................................................................................................................... 12

Chapter 5 .............................................................................................................................................. 12

1. Recommendations ........................................................................................................................ 12

2. Conclusions ................................................................................................................................... 12

Chapter 2: Gendered perspectives on women’s lands rights ............................................................... 13

1. Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 13

2. The Effect of Patriarchy in an African Context .............................................................................. 13

3. Defining Access to Land ................................................................................................................ 14

4. Ecofeminism .................................................................................................................................. 15

5. The Role of Law in Gender ............................................................................................................ 16

6. African Feminism and Customary law .......................................................................................... 16

7. The Dichotomy of ‘Rights’ and ‘Custom’....................................................................................... 18

Page 4: Tutsirai Patricia Makuvachuma LLB Dissertation

4

8. Conclusion ..................................................................................................................................... 19

Chapter 3: Land tenure systems in Zambia and Zimbabwe .................................................................. 20

1. Introduction: Distribution of land in Zimbabwe ........................................................................... 20

2. Background to Land Tenure in Zambia ......................................................................................... 22

3. Gender in Multiple Customary Land Functions ............................................................................ 24

4. Utilisation of Customary Law and Inheritance Laws ..................................................................... 25

5. Women and Land in Zimbabwe Today ......................................................................................... 27

6. Conclusion ..................................................................................................................................... 28

Chapter 4 International, regional and domestic legal frameworks ...................................................... 30

1. Introduction: Is There a Right to Land? ........................................................................................ 30

2. International law ........................................................................................................................... 30

3. Regional ............................................................................................................................................. 33

3.1 Protocol to the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights on the Rights of Women in Africa

(the Protocol) and Non-Disccrimination ............................................................................................... 33

Weaknesses of the Protocol ................................................................................................................. 35

3.2 The Southern African Development Community Protocol on Gender and Development with

regard to land........................................................................................................................................ 37

4. Domestic ........................................................................................................................................... 38

4.1 The Constitution of Zambia ............................................................................................................. 38

4.2 The Constitution of Zimbabwe ........................................................................................................ 40

4.3 The Case of Magaya v Magaya....................................................................................................... 42

Conclusion ............................................................................................................................................. 43

Chapter 5: Conclusion and Recommendations ..................................................................................... 45

Conclusion ............................................................................................................................................. 45

Recommendations ................................................................................................................................ 46

Bibliography .......................................................................................................................................... 48

Page 5: Tutsirai Patricia Makuvachuma LLB Dissertation

5

A comparative study of women’s right to access customary land

in Zambia and Zimbabwe

Chapter 1

1. Research Problem

The point of departure is the inequality that is evident between men and women in land tenure

rights in terms of succession law. Within customary tenure systems in Southern Africa,

women’s access to and control of land tends to be mediated by their male relations. The system

of male primogeniture is present in both Zimbabwean and Zambian customary law thus giving

rise to gender discrimination against women. My aim is to evaluate an international and African

human rights framework and the cultures of the above mentioned countries in order to achieve

a balance between the two perspectives. I will use a comparative approach and feminist theory

in order to pave the way for more access the right to own and control land for women.

2. Assumptions

Women lack rights to land within customary tenure

Customary practices such as male primogeniture diminish women’s access to

customary land in terms of the law of succession

The constitutions of Zimbabwe and Zambia afford women and men the right to equal

treatment and opportunity.

The African Human and People’s Rights provides for the equal enjoyment of the rights

and freedoms recognised by the present Charter.

The Convention on the Elimination of all forms of Discrimination Against Women

(CEDAW) ratified by both countries, aims to modify cultural practices to achieve the

elimination of prejudices and customary practices that are based on inferiority or

superiority of either of the sexes.

Page 6: Tutsirai Patricia Makuvachuma LLB Dissertation

6

3. Research Questions

i. Should the law privilege cultural practices over individual rights?

ii. Do customary practices discriminate against woman when inheriting from their

husbands or fathers in terms of control of land?

iii. How can constitutions (as the supreme law of the land) afford women’s right to land

more practically?

iv. Can ratified international instruments aid in legal equality when domestic legislation is

lacking on the issue?

4. Motivation

The issue of women’s right to land is important especially in Southern Africa because

ownership of land is critical to social and economic security and development, as well as human

identity. In this region, although women produce the bulk of the country’s food, it is evident

that the lack of control over and access to land is inextricably linked to women becoming the

majority among the poor. Despite the equality clauses that afford both men and women the

same opportunities, women are ultimately discriminated against as a result of gender biased

legislation, customs and traditions that inhibit women from owning and inheriting in their own

right. In this paper, the focus will be on inheritance with regard to the fact that allocation of

land discriminates against women who are married, divorced, single or widowed who become

most vulnerable to losing land after the death of the man in whom the land is registered. I seek

to do a gender-based research that analyses the different institutions and their role in shaping

legal processes.

4.1 History of Land in Zimbabwe

Land is pivotal to the economic, political and social lives of most women in Zimbabwean

society. In 1993 the Rukuni Land Commission was set up to re-evaluate the land tenure system

and establish a new course for resettlement.1 The commission came up with 5 new tenure

systems and also concluded that “23% of the women in communal areas had secondary land

rights, and most married women had no rights to land, except through their husbands”.2 It is

1 Mushunje, M (2001) Women’s Land Rights in Zimbabwe, University of Zimbabwe. 2 Ibid.

Page 7: Tutsirai Patricia Makuvachuma LLB Dissertation

7

alleged by historians that the marginalisation of Zimbabwean women emanates from

colonialism and not tradition. The Land Husbandry Act of 1951 gave title to African men that

were married and women were left out of this process. However, it is evident that from custom,

that a woman was only given a piece of land after the birth of her first child, leaving childless

women at a disadvantage. This is indicative a patriarchal system has been that gave women a

facade of rights that has perpetuated into modern society. The lack of guaranteed land rights

has made women’s dependency on their male relatives or spouses rife.

4.2 History of Land in Zambia

In Zambia there are two ways of holding land; individually or collective rights. The main law

pertaining to land in Zambia is the Lands Act of 1995 and it divided land into state land and

customary land. The Act, defines as “land which is not situated in customary area”.3 This land

is acquired by making an application for a title deed to the custodian of state land,

Commissioner of Lands in the Ministry of Lands, who acts on behalf of the president of the

republic.4 Customary land is administered under traditions and customs pertaining to

ownership and use. The rules regarding these practices differ according to the area and are

generally not in writing. The title deed in this instance is obtained by approval by the Chief or

head of the village. The application has to go with a sketch to identify the land and this is sent

to the Commissioner of Lands.5 The Intestate Succession Act, 1989 in Zambia governs

inheritance where the deceased dies without a will; however this does not extend to customary

land. Being outside of this aforementioned Act, all customary land is inherited by patriarchal

customs and traditions which are discriminatory against women. Thus, although this act

appears to afford equal opportunity for women, as a result of the longstanding discrimination

in Zambian society, ownership, access and control are still limited.

3 Lands Act of 1995. 4 Machina R (2002) Women’s Land Rights in Zambia: Policy Provisions, Legal Framework and Constraints.

Paper presented at the Regional Conference on Women’s Land Rights, Zimbabwe.4 5 Ibid.

Page 8: Tutsirai Patricia Makuvachuma LLB Dissertation

8

4.3 Inheritance and Women’s Constraints

While statutory law treats women under the age of majority principle, customary law ironically

treats women as minors.6 This comes as a result of a male dominated structure that implements

policies and legislation that demeans women as a whole. In the registration of land, it is a norm

that among married couples, the title is registered in the name of the husband. This ensures his

entitlement to the land where the state will decide if the surviving spouse(s) and children

succeed in gaining holdership under the same terms.7 In customary law, the heir is male

illustrating that the registration system favours men. A widow is only afforded a usufruct of

right to use, but not ownership.

English law is the primary form of governance in Zambia. In terms of succession, statute

determines the procedure followed one a testator dies testate and intestate. Because land is

required through inheritance, the areas under customary tenure do not afford the right of

inheriting this land from her husband.8 Thus, the inheritance of rights to the land and the control

thereof is the choice of the relatives of the deceased, and usually male. The Intestate Succession

Act of 1998 states that the surviving spouse and children must inherit 20% of the deceased’s

estate to protect their interest. However, under the customary tenure, land cannot be inherited.

The status quo is that the kin of the deceased’s man take the property including the house which

leaves the widow with close to nothing; this is known as property grabbing. Because women

are not afforded equal rights to property ownership, they lose their access to fields where their

homes and livelihoods have been invested.

4.5 The Legal Framework Administrating Women’s Land Rights

International law

Both Zambia and Zimbabwe have ratified the United Nations Convention of the

Elimination of all Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW).9 According to

6 Gaidzwana R (2011) Women and Land in Zimbabwe, University of Zimbabwe. Paper Presented at the

Conference “Why women matter in agriculture”, Sweden., p10. 7 Ibid. 8 Machina (note 4 above) 11. 9 Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women of 1981 adopted by the General

Assembly resolution 34/180 of 18 December 1979.

Page 9: Tutsirai Patricia Makuvachuma LLB Dissertation

9

Article 2(f) of CEDAW states that “state parties... by all appropriate means and without

delay... undertake:.. (f) To take all appropriate measures, including legislation to modify

or abolish existing laws, regulations, customs and practices which constitute

discrimination against women”.10 The Protocol to the African Charter on Human and

People’s Rights on the Rights of Women in Africa of 2005 was established out of the

concern that African women continue to be victimised through discrimination and the

perpetuation of cultural practices. This Protocol holds African states to an international

standard of human and women’s rights.11 The shortfalls of international agreements are

that it gives no guidance as to how these protocols will be implemented in domestic

courts. Zimbabwe and Zambia has both statutory and customary law, and the protocols

draw no distinction between the two. This is particularly pertinent because the

application of either one could change the outcome of the affected parties.

Implementation would be seen the amalgamation of international tenets with domestic

legislation but the onus is on the states to see this materialise. This has proved to be

difficult because states have a constitution and customary law that is based on

longstanding traditional and tribal practices.

National legislation

The constitutions of Zimbabwe and Zambia contain numerous provisions that advocate

for equal treatment of women. The Zambian Constitution in section 51 gives women

and men the equal right to treatment an opportunity as well as right to inherit won,

administer and control property.12 The founding values of the Zimbabwean

Constitution declares that the state must promote must promote the full participation of

women in every sphere of Zimbabwean society. Furthermore, Section 80 states that

customs and cultural practices that infringe on the rights of women conferred by the

constitution are void to the extent of the infringement. 13

10 CEDAW Article 14(g). 11 African Women’s Protocol in the African Charter in Human and Peoples’ Rights. 12 Section 51 of the Zambian Constitution. 13 Section 80 of Zimbabwean Constitution.

Page 10: Tutsirai Patricia Makuvachuma LLB Dissertation

10

4.5 Problems Associated with Women’s Control and Access to Land

The duality of laws is problematic for women because land rights are primarily in the hands of

traditional leadership under customary law. Most women in Zimbabwe are given communal

land and because this belongs to the state, it cannot be inherited if a woman becomes a widow.14

Although there has been an increase in single or married women buying property in their own

individual titles, there are still few married couples who register through joint titling.15 A

country may fail to implement international protocols simply because it does not feel the need

to commit to the goals at that particular point. This can be done after a state does an examination

of its needs and concludes that human rights are seen as a goal to be aspired for, rather than

embedding human rights in its foundational values. However, it is my view that the rights of

woman should be at the heart of national legislation and that the state should make an effort to

ensure that women’s rights need to be realised in a more practical manner.

5. Methodology and approach

This is a desk top research method where I will make use of books, academic journals, statutes,

treaties and case law. This will be a comparative study of Zambia and Zimbabwe, focussing on

similarities and difference in the two countries on the subject topic. I will use a feminist

perspective because a gender perspective law and policy is necessary in the restructuring of

gender perspectives. Customary and traditional land allocation should be centred on

independent title deeds to land and gender equality in inheritance. Furthermore, land rights

should be given through occupation so that women do not become dispossessed in divorce or

widowhood.

6. Limitations of study

As a result of monetary constraints, I will not be able to travel to Zambia to do a more

in depth study.

14 Mushunje (note 1 above) 6. 15 Machina (note 4 above) 13.

Page 11: Tutsirai Patricia Makuvachuma LLB Dissertation

11

7. Chapter Outline

Chapter 1

1. Research problem

2. Assumptions

3. Research Questions

4. Motivation

4.1 History of land in Zimbabwe

4.2 History of land in Zambia

4.3 Inheritance and Women’s constraints

4.4 Legal framework administering women’s land rights

4.5 Problems associated with women’s control and access to land.

5. Methodology and approach

6. Limitations of study

7. Chapter Outline

Chapter 2: Gendered Perspectives on Women’s Land Rights

1. Introduction

2. The Effect of Patriarchy in an African Context

3. Defining Access to Land

4. Ecofeminism

5. Role of Gender

6. African Feminism and Customary law

7. The Dichotomy between ‘Rights’ and ‘Customs’

8. Conclusion

Chapter 3: Land Tenure Systems in Zambia and Zimbabwe

1. Distribution of Land in Zimbabwe

2. Background to the Land Tenure in Zambia

3. Gender in Multiple Customary Land Functions

4. Utilisation of Customary Law and Inheritance Laws

Page 12: Tutsirai Patricia Makuvachuma LLB Dissertation

12

5. Women in Zimbabwe Today

6. Conclusion

Chapter 4: International, Regional and Domestic Legal Framework

1. Introduction: Is There a Right to Land?

2. International Law

3. Regional Law

3.1 Protocol to the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights on

the Rights of Women in Africa (the Protocol) and Non-Discrimination

3.2 Southern African Development Community Protocol on Gender and

Development with regard to land

4. Domestic Laws

4.1 Constitution of Zambia

4.2 Constitution of Zimbabwe

5. Conclusion

Chapter 5

1. Recommendations

2. Conclusions

Page 13: Tutsirai Patricia Makuvachuma LLB Dissertation

13

Chapter 2: Gendered perspectives on women’s lands rights

1. Introduction

African social perspectives and everyday experiences centers on the way people form part of

the networks that lead to their access to resources.16 The extrinsic link between women and

land has been identified to be important for the status of women, gender equality and women

empowerment.17 Because women consist of the majority of the world’s population, it is

important that they have access to a larger portion of land. The underlying assumptions are that

there are gender neutral international and domestic laws and policies on access to property and

that there is gender equality.18 The reality faced by most is that access is gendered as a result

of customary and traditional practices. This chapter seeks to explore ecofeminism with regards

to access to the environment, the nexus between gendered relationships and gender-neutral

laws, gender justice, and human rights in legal pluralism.19 Furthermore an in depth analysis

will be made on the embedded nature of gender segmentation and segregation and the practices

that sustain gender inequalities.

2. The Effect of Patriarchy in an African Context

Patriarchy in its literal sense means ‘rule of fathers’.20 However, in the modern day era, this

has now gone beyond fathers and now extends to the rule of husbands, brothers and uncles who

form part of the societal structure.21 Male dominance is at the center and it is the cultural aspect

of patriarchy that women are seen as inferior and thus their rights are not realized in most

spaces. Patriarchy thus is the underlying foundation of women’s access to land because of the

patrilineal control of resources. This highly influences laws and how they are implemented

through the ideology that the adult male is the ultimate controller material resources and

decision maker. The issue of gender is highly linked to patriarchy because it is a social construct

16 Griffiths, A ‘Networking resources: a gendered perspective on Kwena Women’s property rights’ in H, Lim &

A, Bottomley (2007) Feminist Perspectives on Land Law. 218 17 Kameri-Mbote P, Hellum A, & Nyamweya P ‘Pathways to real access to land-related resources for women in

in A Tsanga & J Steward, Women in Law: innovative approaches to teaching, research and analysis 333. 18 Kameri-Mbote , Hellum & Nyamweya (note 17 above) 333. 19Kameri-Mbote , Hellum & Nyamweya (note 17 above) 334. 20 Patriarchy is a system of social structures and practices in which men dominate women. This happens in

almost all spheres of life including law, commerce, education, political or village leadership, etc. 21 Kameri-Mbote P (2005) ‘The land has its owners: gender issues in land tenure under

customary law in Kenya. International Environmental Law Research Centre. 1

Page 14: Tutsirai Patricia Makuvachuma LLB Dissertation

14

that leads to the embedding of the patriarchal system.22 The division of maleness and

femaleness leads to each gender having specific abilities and duties in a social-economic set

up. Where women are viewed as the homemakers that perform domestic chores such as

washing and cooking food, men on the other hand, are the heads of the family and making the

decisions for the family.

Culture is important because it shapes one’s identity and how one experience oneself in a

familiar space and the world. Gender relations are passed down from one generation to the

next, and it is evident that inequality has remained the constant. The reinforcement of gender

roles tends to maintain the woman as inferior, and depending on the man for status and

resources.23 In this way, culture embeds and enforces male power and their interests, whilst

women remain in a position of subordination and inequality.

3. Defining Access to Land

The law of property denotes that ownership is the most comprehensive real right over a thing,

and its entitlements are protected by legal provisions. Access, however, is concerned with the

relationships with those that own the land, and those that use the land.24 A distinction must be

made between access in the legal sphere, compared to access in terms of living and the

customary law. The notion of having individual and communal land in a customary sense leads

to the potential detriment to some women members of the community.25 Access therefore is

the authorization that a person is given where one is not an owner. A contentious issue arises

here because of the gendered social constructs, where a woman access to the land is done

through a structure vicarious ownership through men as their fathers, husbands, uncles or

brothers.26 Access to property in many traditional societies as pointed out above is premised

on three things namely, membership to a given society, functions relating to the property and

the performance of reciprocal obligations owed to others in the society.27 The socially

constructed roles of men and women mentioned before are essential to the outlining of access

rights. Control for its part involves the power to distribute and redistribute access rights to

22 Kameri-Mbote (note 21 above) 2. 23 Albertyn C ‘The stubborn persistence of patriarchy? Gender and cultural diversity in South Africa’ (2009) 2

Constitutional Court Review 171. 24 Kameri-Mbote, Hellum & Nyamweya (note 17 above) 341. 25 Ibid. 26Kameri-Mbote, Hellum & Nyamweya (note 17 above) 343. 27 Kameri-Mbote (note 21 above) 6.

Page 15: Tutsirai Patricia Makuvachuma LLB Dissertation

15

members of the society. This power is determined by the power relations between members of

the community. In patriarchal settings, the role vests in the older male members of a

community. Because customary communities often separate themselves from the legal aspects

of their societies, patriarchal perceptions continue to prevail. Land rights for women are

important for the betterment of the status of women in an African context. Their access to land

ensures that their needs are respected within the household and family set up.28

4. Ecofeminism

Ecofeminism29 is concerned with a desire to balance a deep concern for social and economic

justice, particularly with respect to welfare of women.30 This theory seeks to bring a radical

shift in the relations between women and men with regards to perception of land access. The

term “Mother Nature” is figurative of the interconnectedness between the women and the

land.31 There are therefore overarching perceptions that accompany ecofeminism: there is a

patriarchal dominance that has gender oppression as a consequence. Secondly, women relate

more to the environment, whereas men have a stronger connection to culture. Moreover, culture

is then seen to be superior to the environment, resulting in a male dominated order.32 The

ecofeminist approach then explores the effect of environmental degradation on the environment

on women’s everyday lives. Land is significant to women because it is a critical component to

their survival. The access to land for the purposes of production is a prerequisite that allows

vulnerable members of society, such as women, to have an agricultural benefit from the land.33

Furthermore, when women are given better access to land, they have a better position in

bargaining power. Rural women have a special bond with the land because it improves their

poverty and sustains the livelihoods.34 There is an assumption that women use the land for

activities such as vegetable gardens and rearing chickens, whereas men us the land for animal

farming and hunting. However, these gendered activities are not always static and therefore

policy makers have to ensure that they are gender sensitive when establishing policies.35

28 Walker C ‘Elusive equality: women, property rights and land reform in South Africa’ (2009) 25 SAJHR 469. 29 Ecofeminism is a theory that encompasses sustainable development of the environment and gender equality. 30Kameri-Mbote , Hellum & Nyamweya (note 17 above) 338. 31 Shiva, V (2005) Earth Democracy.

32 Kameri-Mbote , Hellum & Nyamweya (note 17 above) 339. 33 Moyo, C ‘Rural Women and Land, the Inseparable Twins: A Case of South Africa’ (2013) 11(2) Gender and

Behavior 5396. 34 Moyo (note 33 above) 5396. 35 Ibid.

Page 16: Tutsirai Patricia Makuvachuma LLB Dissertation

16

5. The Role of Law in Gender

The legal pluralistic approach is combined with women’s law to establish a human rights

approach to the socio-economic plight of women. With the developments of the legal

dispensation through CEDAW and the Protocol to the African Charter on Human and Peoples’

Rights on the Rights of Women in Africa,36 non-discrimination and equality has been

ameliorated extensively.37 However, the centralistic view that the abovementioned conventions

apply wholly, negate the patrilineal and inheritance systems that are imbedded in certain

spaces.38 The plight of women to access land cannot not be analysed solely through an

international lens because of the intersectionality their lived experiences. A national-level

investigation will be made in this paper to redress the fact that particular normative regimes

limit women’s access to land.39 It is important to interrogate whether a structure of legal

pluralism entailing diverse family law models will provide a meaningful reconciliation with

the prevailing patriarchal system and a state’s commitment to improve gender equality.40

6. African Feminism and Customary law

African feminism is a “feminist epistemology and a form of rhetoric that has provided

arguments, which validate the experience of women of Africa”.41 This discourse seeks to

generate a discussion the focuses on a universal consciousness which understands the history

of African women, their present everyday realities and future anticipations.42 The African

feminist framework works towards having the minority of voices of African women being

heard in terms a more secure access to land. Empirical studies in Zambia and Zimbabwe

illustrate that the complex relationship of standards and norms of customary and statutory

legislation significantly affects women in terms of how they access land, from whom and how

much.43 History of African land tenure is embedded in patriarchal tenets and has often been

36 The Protocol to the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights on the Rights of Woman in Africa of 2005

(The Protocol). 37 Kameri-Mbote, Hellum & Nyamweya (note 17 above) 345. 38 Ibid. 39 Kameri-Mbote, Hellum & Nyamweya (note 17 above) 347. 40 Higgins T, & Fenrich J ‘Customary Law, Gender Equality, and the Family: The Promise and limits of a

Choice Paradigm’ in J Fenrich, P Galizzi & T Higgins (2011) The Future of African Customary Law 423. 41 Goredema, R ‘African feminism: the African woman’s struggle for identity’ (2010) Vol 1 African Yearbook

of Rhetoric: Gender Rhetoric: North-South 34. 42 Ibid. 43 Whitehead A & Tsikata D ‘Policy Discourses on Women’s Land Rights in Sub-Saharan Africa: The

implications of the Re-turn to the Customary’ (2003) Vol 3(1&2) Journal for Agrarian Change 68.

Page 17: Tutsirai Patricia Makuvachuma LLB Dissertation

17

affected by colonialism at a community level. As a result of these complex nuances, the

formulation of policies is far removed in African land tenure outcomes relating to gender. In

post-independent states, land remains an important weapon in power struggles, where the

inefficiency of land administrators reenacts the discriminatory practices of the past.44

Customary tenure is guaranteed in Zambia and Zimbabwe and unfortunately, the constitutions

of both countries prescribe the scope of customary law, identifying specific processes and

practices in relation to land.45 The reality of these enshrined rights do not bring practical

outcomes to equitable access to land because of the poor enforcement and implementation of

the law.46 The informal systems of land administration and management operate in a void that

makes women’s participation or leadership in land administration and management particularly

difficult.47 It is therefore imperative to assess whether principles of gender equity are broadly

embraced, socially or legally accepted, and promoted at the institutional level (such as land

registries, courts, conflict resolution institutions, and local land administration agencies);

assess the gender balance within land administration agencies; and examine the rules,

institutions, and players involved in customary, religious, and informal frameworks

particularly those regarding inheritance and divorce.48

Although this formalistic approach is favourable for legal centrists, the need to preserve the

native law and custom only displays the voices only of certain groups in indigenous society.

Therefore, there is a link between the holders of power in African communities, and colonial

powers.49 The socially embedded characteristic of land means that access to land is based on

its utility to certain groups in society. However, there is also a system of hierarchy, which has

gender implications for women. Although women have access to land, they are not similar to

the access of men to land because of the gendered positions that exist in kinship systems.50

Marriage is the most prominent way in which claim land as husbands pass land to their wives

for farming. Furthermore, they may preserve land from their own kin.51 However, this claim is

weak because it does not include unmarried women. As a result of this, it is important to be

44 Whitehead & Tsikata (note 43 above) 73. 45 Whitehead & Tsikata (note 43 above) 75. 46Whitehead & Tsikata (note 43 above) 76. 47 Odeny M ‘Improving Access to Land and strengthening Women’s land rights in Africa’ Presentation at the

Annual World Bank Conference on Land and Poverty (2013) The World Bank- Washington DC, April 8-11,

2013 p 6. 48 Ibid. 49 Whitehead & Tsikata (note 43 above) 75. 50 Whitehead & Tsikata (note 43 above) 77. 51Whitehead & Tsikata (note 43 above) 78.

Page 18: Tutsirai Patricia Makuvachuma LLB Dissertation

18

wary of national laws and rules that marginalize the plight of women in processes that change

and redefine custom.52

7. The Dichotomy of ‘Rights’ and ‘Custom’

The universalist theory holds that human rights are central to each persons living reality and

therefore it is imperative for all states to protect human rights.53 Cultural relativists on the other

hand, challenge this trajectory and claim that rights can only be validated in a specific context,

and that their entitlements are culturally specific. A closely related debate is the differentiation

between individual and group rights. Relativists focus their argument on the community,

whereas universalists prioritize individuals. The static nature of custom “ignores the fact that

there are no longer bounded cultures circumscribing people’s life experiences”.54 Cultural

relativity upholds this position, thereby denying marginalized groups’ challenge for change.

However, the essentialism nature of rights by universalists is also problematic. The rights based

approach been illustrated to be a variable that can be re-negotiated in various levels of society

through international instruments and within the jurisprudence of different countries.55

Legal pluralism can be used to criticize both universalism and relativism. The argument is that

both theories fail to take into consideration the intersectionality of individual or cultural rights

of people in the majority of societies. There are state laws, international instruments, customary

regimes, that people choose to draw upon to fit their needs at that specific time. Therefore, it

is almost impossible in the context of Zambia and Zimbabwe, to rely on only one or the other

because “nowhere can rights or custom be said to exist or operate in isolation from the other.56

In the everyday lives of people in a society, people live in a context of cultural and legal

pluralism to deal with real life situations. This approach encapsulates the plight of women as

they deal with issues of gender equality. It is imperative to challenge the status quo to make

rights and customs more intersectional, contextually negotiable and sensitive to the

interdependence of women.57 It is evident that rights and legal strategies fail when they do not

interrogate power relations and gendered relationship. National laws do not grapple with

52 Classens A & Mnisi S ‘Rural women redefining land rights in the context of the living customary law’ (2009)

25 SAJHR 495. 53 Classens and Mnisi (note 52 above) 496. 54 Classens and Mnisi (note 52 above) 497. 55 Ibid. 56 Ibid. 57 Classens and Mnisi (note 52 above) 499.

Page 19: Tutsirai Patricia Makuvachuma LLB Dissertation

19

women’s problems at local level. The most progressive way to rectify this is that the law needs

to be informed by the pragmatism of overlapping rights and customs existing at different levels

in different spaces.58

8. Conclusion

Gender and land tenure in African customary law continues to engage policy and law makers

for as long as there is no equity for women. This chapter has outlined the predominance of

patriarchy in law, policy and practice ensures and that the discrimination against women is

embedded in formal structures. The deconstructing, reconstructing and reconceptualising

customary law notions around the issues of access would create a positive difference for

women. It is important to debunk the notion that all customary law is retrogressive and capture

positive ‘living’ customary law aspects. The struggle of land rights is inherently covered in

the contestation between custom and land rights. A legal pluralistic approach is needed to

address this issue. The following chapter addresses a situational analysis of the Zambian and

Zimbabwean land tenures and the practical implication for women.

58 Classens and Mnisi (note 52 above) 515.

Page 20: Tutsirai Patricia Makuvachuma LLB Dissertation

20

Chapter 3: Land tenure systems in Zambia and Zimbabwe

1. Introduction: Distribution of land in Zimbabwe

Zimbabwe has a total area of 39 million hectares of land.59 Two main models have been at the

core of the re-allocation of land in Zimbabwe; one premised on smallholder production and

one focused on commercial production.60 However in practice, these models vary significantly

and they regularly overlap. The historical background of Zimbabwe illustrates the inequitable

distribution of land from the era of colonialism to present day times:61

1984 The native reserves were established and this resulted to the codification of

customary law, a concept which was imposed on to indigenous African

people.62

1901 7,000,000 black people were given 8,4 million hectares of land, and 12, 600

settlers allocated 32 million hectares of prime land to the colonial regime.63

1930 The Land Apportionment Act formalised after recommendations by the

Morris Carter Commission.

1977 The Land Apportionment Act was amended to allow Africans to purchase

land in European areas.

1982 Communal Areas Act passed to create Tribal Trust lands to allow for

resettlement.

1992 Land Acquisition Act gave the government the first right to purchase excess

land for redistribution to the landless.

1993 Rukuni Land Commission was established to study land tenure system and

come up with recommendations for the possible best route for resettlement.

1997 Land Reform and Resettlement Program II was launched.

2000 Fast-Track Land Reform Programme.

Before independence in 1980, it is evident from the above timeline that the discrimination was

mainly against black people, as white people were the given the most fertile land.64 The main

59 Mushunje (note 1 above) 4. 60 Scoones, I., Marongwe, M., Mavengedze, N., Murimbarimba, F., Mahenehene, J. & Sukume, C, (2011)

Zimbabwe’s Land Reform: A summary of findings. Brighton. 61 Mushunje (note 1 above) 6. 62 Ibid. 63 Ibid. 64 Mushunje (note 1 above) 7.

Page 21: Tutsirai Patricia Makuvachuma LLB Dissertation

21

goal of the land reform programme in Zimbabwe was to redistribute land to black people and

deal with the social internal stratifications of black people with regard to land entitlement.65

The issues concerning age, gender class and gender discrimination have been dealt with very

little attention, while efficiency of land use, commercial viability and effects of land tenure on

output have been highly debated in the discourse of land.66 In the post-independence

dispensation, the discrimination shifted to discrimination by black men against black women.67

This illustrates that women have always been in a subordinate position; discrimination exists

pre and post-independence. The majority of labourers in agriculture have been women, yet land

reform has continuously apply inheritance and allocation regulations that discriminate against

women such that married, divorced, single and widowed women always exposed to the danger

of losing land open the death of man in whom the land is registered.68 This chapter discusses

the various cultural, political and administrative factors that have limited women’s access to

land and how this lack of security has a detrimental effect on women’s sustainable livelihood.69

A report compiled by the Zimbabwe Women’s Resource Centre70 states that 23% of women

who lived in communal areas had access to land rights, while married women only had access

through their husbands.71 Historically, the Land Husbandry Act72 gave all African men a title

those living on the reserves. However, women were side-lined from this colonially-entrenched

criterion, and this has perpetuated in the low status of women today. There was no protection

of women’s rights and this illustrates that traditional society is also to blame for the position

women are in, as this has disseminated into modern society.73 According to anthropologists

studying pre-colonial Zimbabwe, the status of Zimbabwean women has shifted dramatically

due to the impact of colonial structures and a colonially-imposed legal system.74 Historically,

women's land and resource access was guaranteed through social and familial connections,

65 Gaidzwana (note 6 above) 2. 66 Ibid. 67 Mushunje (note 1 above) 2. 68 Gaidzwana (note 6 above) 2. 69 Gaidzwana (note 6 above) 3 70 Zimbabwe Women’s Resource Centre and Network (1994) The Gender Dimensions of Access and Land Use

Rights in Zimbabwe. Evidence to the Land Commission. 71 Mushunje (note 1 above) 7. 72 Land Husbandry Act of 1951. 73 Mushunje (note 1 above) 9. 74Knobelsdorf, V “Zimbabwe’s Magaya Decision Revisited: Women’s Rights and Land Succession in the

International Context” (2006) 15 Columbia Journal of Gender and Law 3.

Page 22: Tutsirai Patricia Makuvachuma LLB Dissertation

22

with women's agricultural production tied to traditional roles in the family, and access to land

guaranteed by marriage or clan-based land allocation.

The Tribal Trust Lands were changed to Communal Areas under the Communal Lands Act,75

which switched land from traditional leaders to District Councils. However, chiefs continued

to allocate land to households as land was held in trust by the chief or headman.76 This duality

of the law created a lack of clarity between statutory and customary law, under the customary

law, the male head of the household is considered the holder of the land.77 This excludes women

from having primary land rights, demoting women to secondary holders of rights derived from

a male superior. Upon the death of the husband, the land is apportioned amongst his wife and

relatives.78

2. Background to Land Tenure in Zambia

Tenure is an important factor in determining the way resources are effectively managed,

distributed and used. Furthermore, it instructs the way in which people hold collective and

individual rights to land.79 Since the colonial era, there have been three types of land tenure in

Zambia:

i. The ‘reserve land’ was set aside for African residents by the colonialists, which

gave them communal rights under the customary law with administration by the

tribal chiefs. This was arranged under a patrilineal and or matrilineal system,

accounted for by 36% of the country’s 752 000 square kilometre land area. This

system of land tenure advocated for joint ownership, as the land was jointly owned

by all persons that could successfully trace their ancestry to that particular village.

ii. The ‘trust land’ was also set aside for Africans but was not established under a non-

tribal basis. Some land was set aside for the purposes of public use and some limited

grants were offered to non-Africans. This comprised of 58% of all land and was

administered by the chiefs.

iii. 6% of Zambian land was referred to as ‘state land’ which comprised of freehold or

leasehold titles administered under English law.

75 Communal Lands Act of 1981. 76 Gandaidzwa (note 6 above)3. 77 Gandaidzwa (note 6 above) 4. 78 Ibid. 79 Machina (note 4 above) 3.

Page 23: Tutsirai Patricia Makuvachuma LLB Dissertation

23

Zambia was a protectorate of the British Government in the 1920s and this resulted in that the

land was held in ‘trust’ for the Zambian people.80 In the post-colonial period, in 1975, land

reform resulted in land vesting in the President for and on behalf of all Zambians. This gave

the President the ultimate authority over land tenure arrangements structures. The Lands Act

of 199581 repealed the various groupings of land and replaced them with state land and

customary land. State land is governed under English law and one obtains this land by applying

to the Commissioner of Lands in the Ministry of Lands for a title deed.82 Customary land, on

the other hand, is held under traditions and customs that oversee use and ownership. The

common elements of customary land are that it is presided over by a Chief or village head.83

The identified land is sketched and approved and the applicant may proceed to approach the

Commissioner of Lands for a title deed. Therefore the government continued to recognise the

Chief’s to regulate the use and allocate trust and reserve land.84

The Lands Act can be commended for various achievements. The power of the president to

alienate land is limited as consultation with chiefs and local

councils is necessary.85 The conversion of customary land to leasehold tenure allows anyone

who follows the proper procedure to obtain a title deed from previously restricted ‘customary

areas’.86 The Act also yields all council land to the Commissioner of Lands to allow for land

tenure that eliminates all kinds of discriminatory practices of land holdings in councils. Above

all, the Act does not expressly discriminate against women in that any woman can apply for

land, similar to any male. However, this legislation fails to take cognisance of the historically

embedded social inequality where women had no access to the land.87 Consequentially, the

Act is not gender sensitive and continues to perpetuate disproportion. The Land Policy in

Zambia finalised in 2000 identified the need to better the position of women with regard to

their access to land.88 Although discriminate is not explicit, it is implicit and illustrated by the

lack of protection of women’s rights.

80 Ibid. 81 Lands Act of 1995. 82 Machina (note 4 above) 4. 83 Ibid. 84 Hasungule M (2001)’The 1995 Land Act: An obstacle or instrument of development? Briefing paper prepared

for The Zambian Land Alliance. 85 Machina (note 4 above) 5. 86 Ibid. 87 Machina (note 4 above) 6. 88 Machina (note 4 above) 7.

Page 24: Tutsirai Patricia Makuvachuma LLB Dissertation

24

3. Gender in Multiple Customary Land Functions

Customary land plays a pivotal role in the well-being of rural communities as land serves as a

source if shelter, food and social status.89 Customary land provides predominantly poor

communities with access to a commonly shared base of resources which include water from

rivers, grazing land and firewood. The underlying function is socio-economic, therefore

enhancing a person’s status in the community. However, access to land remains a large

contention for women as patriarchal structures maintain power over communities. Land has

several implications that through policy can help bridge the gap between women and men.

Table 1.Multiple Functions of Land Lights.90

Function Examples

Economic Functions Productive activities (farming and livestock

rearing)

Land sales and rentals

Benefits from land appreciation

Investment incentive effects

Food security Source of food and income

Buffer against price increase

Reduced vulnerability Source of food and employment

Collateral for credits

Income from sales and rentals

Social functions Social bargaining within communities

Membership within groups

89 Tagliarino N ‘Zambia; Conversions of Customary Lands to Leasehold Titles’. 90 Meinzen-Dick R, Kameri-Mbote P and MarkelovaH, (2009)” Property Rights for poverty reduction” in J Von

Braun, RV Hill and Pandya-Lorch (eds) The Poorest and Hungry: Assessments, Analyses and Actions, An IFPRI

2020 Book. Washington: IFPRI.

Page 25: Tutsirai Patricia Makuvachuma LLB Dissertation

25

Cultural identity

Religious functions

4. Utilisation of Customary Law and Inheritance Laws

In a male-headed household, it is taken as the norm that the land permit is registered in the

name of the man in the context of married couples.91 The male registrant is therefore guaranteed

tenure until his death, and thereafter, the widow and the children can succeed under the same

terms of the original holder of the right.92 A single woman has access to land through her father

or guardian. Under customary law, the male heir is the immediate successor, showing that

males are also favoured in the registration system. Inheritance laws are legally recognised, but

not enforced socially therefore women are highly likely to lose land to the relatives of their

spouses.93 Without a secure access to land, many widows and children become vulnerable as

this undermines their economic independence and security, as well as their access to adequate

food and housing.94 The denial of access to land leads to the feminization of poverty, as land,

property and power are mostly synonymous to men.95 Zimbabwe and Zambia have made

official efforts to remedy inheritance laws that are discriminatory against women. However,

these are statutory changes that have a minimal practical effect on the majority of population

who are governed mostly through customary law.96 It is important to note legislators have

neglected to decipher the various nuances of cultural realities of their countries which results

in laws that are unpopular and consequently ineffective. In order to develop systems of

customary law that will respect women’s rights, the law must be written and exercised in ways

that will recognise and respect cultural traditions in the systems and contexts they are based.

91 Gandaidzwa (note 6 above) 10. 92 Ibid. 93 Bhatasara, S ‘Women’s Land and Poverty in Zimbabwe: Deconstructing the Impacts of the Fast Track Land

Reform Program’ (2011) Vol 13(1) Journal of Sustainable Development in Africa 324. 94 Richardson, AB, ‘Women’s Inheritance Rights in Africa: The Need to Integrate Cultural Understanding and

Legal Reform’ (2004) Vol 11(2) Article 6 Human Rights Brief 19. 95 Human Rights Commission ‘Right to adequate housing with a perspective from selected areas in Zambia.

(2009). State of Human Rights Report in Zambia. 96 Richardson (note 94 above) 19.

Page 26: Tutsirai Patricia Makuvachuma LLB Dissertation

26

Although Article 23 of the Zambia’s Constitution97 forbids discrimination against the lines of

gender, the same constitution does not mention personal law concerning inheritance of property

and the application of customary law.98 The safeguard of women’s interests has changed over

time, but what is constant is that women are treated as minors who are subordinate to men-

fathers, brothers, uncles and husbands. When a woman is divorced or widowed, she is

permitted to use the land but she but will not, under customary law, inherit control of the land.

The result is that widows return to their natal families where they are subsequently subjected

dependant on male kin for access to land.99 Therefore, regardless of a woman’s status, single,

single mother, married, widow or divorced, the inequality is constant and is an underlying

feature.

In a patrilocal marriage100 a woman will only have use of the husband’s land at the pleasure of

the latter’s choice, and when a divorce or death of the husband happens, she will normally

return to her relatives. She therefore does not retain any rights in respect of her husband’s

land.101 However, if the widow decides to stay at her husband’s village, she may continue using

the land, especially if there are children involved. This is done in terms of the Intestate

Succession Act102 and a spouse is the primary inheritor of the estate.103 The widow is not

entitled to inherit the title to the home, but she can only stay on the homestead after she dies or

remarries. Therefore her only right is a limited real right through a usufruct of use and not

ownership.104 The traditional courts are mandated to preside over conflict over issues on a local

level, but they are not recognised officially by the Zambian government. In addition, the chiefs

who head these courts are predominantly male and accordingly rarely take into consideration

the plight of women.

It is important to note that section 2 of the Intestate Succession Act105 does not refer to land

which at the time of the intestate death had been under customary law. The issue here is that

widows cannot benefit or even seek for protection under the act which purports to elevate their

status because the property is excluded may be the only property that is owned by the deceased

97 Zambia Constitution of 1991. 98 Machina (note 4 above) 9. 99 Machina (note 4 above) 10. 100 This is where a wife moves to her husband’s village. 101 Machina (note 4 above) 10. 102 Intestate Succession 5 Act 1989. 103 This act governs administration of estate where there is no will. 104 Richardson (note 94 above) 21. 105 Intestate Succession Act 5 of 1989.

Page 27: Tutsirai Patricia Makuvachuma LLB Dissertation

27

person.106 The widows are excluded as a result of customary land not being included in the Act,

and thus are deprived of engaging in activities such as farming, to make a living. The Act

becomes redundant as it leaves widows that the mercy of discriminatory customary practices

which the Act seeks to avoid. Woman should effectively be allowed to inherit land that is in

customary areas as it is the cornerstone people’s livelihoods.107

In Zimbabwe, it is common cause that land allocation is centred on households with married

couples, or that women seek land within the family context. Therefore the male registrant is

always guaranteed of tenure until he dies and it is only after his death that the widow and

children can succeed to the land.108 It is evident that the system of land registration

automatically biased in favour of men.

5. Women and Land in Zimbabwe Today

Despite the aforementioned importance of land to women, there is a lack of security of tenure.

This is largely due to social and economic discrimination that exists in various levels in society.

Women’s lack of access to land is linked to poverty in both urban and rural areas.109 Out of 70

percent of the rural poor, 80% are women who rely on agriculture to survive. In order to address

this issue, women’s access to land has to be defined in its own context, in such a manner that

the right is guaranteed with or without the help of patriarchy. The current shrinking economy

of Zimbabwe leads to a change in roles in the family structure; however women’s land rights

are not evolving fast enough to illustrate the reality of the situation on the ground.110 Male wage

earners seldom share their earnings with women in the household, which means that without

access to land, they are dependent on a male relative or spouse. 80% of food security in

Zimbabwe is generated by women therefore it is imperative that they have significant access

to the land.111 Section 15 of the Deeds Registries Act112 contains Special Provisions Relating

to Women stating that “a married woman shall be assisted by her husband in executing any

deed or document required to be registered in any deeds registry”. However critics claimed that

106 Chabu D ‘A critical analysis of the efficacy of the Intestate Succession Act chapter 59 of the Laws of Zambia

protecting the right of widows (2005) University of Zimbabwe.4 107 Chabu (note 106 above) 10. 108 Gandaidzwa (note 6 above) 10. 109 Mushunje (note 1 above) 9. 110 Ibid. 111 Mushunje (note 1 above) 11. 112 Deeds Registries Act of 1996.

Page 28: Tutsirai Patricia Makuvachuma LLB Dissertation

28

this was replaced by the Administration of Estates Amendment Act113 which repealed

inheritance laws that were discriminatory against women, civil and registered customary

marriages particularly.114 However this omits a group of women that include unmarried or

divorced women.

The Land Reform Programme in Zimbabwe divided land into A1 and A2 models. The A1

model is generally intended for “landless people with a villagised and self-contained

variant”.115 The model A2 is a commercial based scheme comprising of small, medium and

large scale commercial settlement.116 A major impediment of the A1 model is that patriarchal

tendencies resurfaced as the permits was issued in the name of the husband. The consequence

being that the husband is given primary and use; therefore, the crops and the profits that

emanate from them are his. Although the woman is predominantly the labourer of the land, she

does not have a right to the fruits of her labour.117 Since communal land is generally allocated

to a man at his ancestral home area. Where married women have access through their husbands,

unmarried women are at a disadvantage even in their own home areas as they only have access

through their brothers. Irrespective of a woman’s status, women have minimal or no access to

communal land in their own right because the emphasis on customary law and tradition is

prejudiced against women.

6. Conclusion

This chapter has outlined the empirical realities that women have faced in Zambia and

Zimbabwe with regard to their access to land. At first glance, one may state that women and

men have equal user rights pertaining to land. However, access and control is dominated by

men. The current legal framework concerning land and inheritance laws perpetuates the

discriminatory practices that have been embedded in society since colonialism. The use of

customary law in land issues furthers this discrimination as the administrators of these

communities are at the helm of patriarchy and uphold the mindset that males are the heads of

the household.

113 Administration of Estates Amendment Act of 1997. 114 Shumba D ‘Women and Land: A Study of Zimbabwe’ (2011) Vol 13(7) Journal of Sustainable Development

in Africa 239. 115 Shumba (note 114 above) 241. 116 Ibid. 117 Shumba (note 114 above) 242.

Page 29: Tutsirai Patricia Makuvachuma LLB Dissertation

29

Legal and cultural barriers have manifested themselves and that creates gender inequality with

regard to land. Society is the source of the practices that influence gender roles and that

entrench the notion that women have a lower status than men. Customary law contains complex

intricacies that need debunking on a social level. This can be achieved through transformation

of the social current attitudes of leaders such as chiefs and headmen, who administer customary

law. Furthermore, women need to be included in the rhetoric that affects them; they must be

given an equal opportunity to voice their opinions in the decision making processes. Changes

in long-held traditional practices cannot be only achieved by promulgating legislation. Laws

are only effective if enforced, and in turn, enforcement is possible only with acceptance and

understanding. Society can only respect the law if they believe that it is beneficial and necessary

for it. Ultimately, women’s right to access land can only be secured when cultural

understanding encompasses a respect for women’s rights and when legal systems respect and

adapt to the cultures in which they will be applied.

Page 30: Tutsirai Patricia Makuvachuma LLB Dissertation

30

Chapter 4 International, regional and domestic legal frameworks

1. Introduction: Is There a Right to Land?

The majority of sub-Saharan African countries derive their livelihood from the land. This

makes it imperative that they have enough access to land in order to generate enough food and

produce to sell and make an income.118 The contentious issues are whether the right to access

to land us fundamental right that each person is entitled to and which a citizen can claim from

their government. Section 295 of the Zambian Constitution119 states that “land shall be held,

used and managed in a way that is equitable”. In the Zimbabwean Constitution120 guarantees

the right to agricultural land in section 72, but this does not include Communal Land. In both

constitutions it is evident that there is mention land being a right. This aspect will be dealt with

in more detail later in this chapter.

2. International law

The Universal Declaration of the Human Rights is the overarching international treaty that

upholds principle of non-discrimination.121 The International Covenant on Economic, Social

and Cultural Rights122 recognise the right to food and housing. This can be translated into the

right to land as land is the basis of obtaining food and shelter. Furthermore, the right of access

to land is also the right to development as “every person is entitled to participate in, contribute

and enjoy economic, social, cultural and political development”.123 Land is inextricably linked

to the right to life and dignity.124 Although Zimbabwe has ratified these conventions, women

cannot claim the right to non-discrimination and the right to legal tenure.125

118 Rugege S ‘The right of access to land and its implications in Southern Africa: A comparative study of South

Africa and Zimbabwe land reform laws and programmes’ (2004) 14 Law, Democracy and Development Law

Journal 236. 119 Constitution of Zambia of 1996. 120 Constitution of Zimbabwe of 2013. 121 Universal Declaration of Human Rights of 1948. 122 International Covenant on Economic Social and Cultural Rights of 16 December 1966, Art 11. 123 Declaration on the Right to Development adopted by the United Nations General Assembly in Resolution

41/128 of4December 1986: Art 1. 124 Rugege (note 118 above) 237. 125 Mushunje (note 1 above) 12.

Page 31: Tutsirai Patricia Makuvachuma LLB Dissertation

31

The Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women

(CEDAW)126 reiterates that while observing fundamental human rights, there must be a

concerted effort to realise the worth, dignity and equal rights of men and women. Article 3 of

CEDAW emphases that State parties have to take “...all appropriate measures, including

legislation, to ensure the full development and advancement of women, for the purpose of

guaranteeing them the exercise and enjoyment of human rights and fundamental freedoms on

a basis of equality with men.” Despite the various international instruments established by the

United Nations, widespread discrimination against women continues to exist. CEDAW

purports to realise the full development of the potential of women in the service of their

countries. The new economic order of the world needs to be based on equity and this includes

equality to access land. According to article 14(g), “state parties shall ensure that women have

the right to have access to agricultural credit loans, marketing facilities, appropriate technology

and equal treatment in land and agrarian reform as well as in land resettlement schemes”.

By ratifying CEDAW, a member State commits itself to undertake a series of measures to end

discrimination against women in all forms,127 including:

a. The integration of the principle of equality of men and women in their legal

system,

b. The abolition of all discriminatory laws and the adoption of suitable laws

prohibiting discrimination against women;

c. The establishment of tribunals and other public institutions to ensure the

efficient protection of women against discrimination; and

d. The elimination of all acts of discrimination against women by persons and

organisations.

Zambia ratified CEDAW in 1985, and Zimbabwe ratified the Convention in 1991 in which

both states agreed to "incorporate the principles of equality of men and women in (its) legal

system, to abolish all discriminatory laws and adopt appropriate ones prohibiting

discrimination against women". However, both states have not successfully implemented and

incorporated this human right treaty in their constitutions. Furthermore, the constitutions

126 CEDAW. 127 Ibid.

Page 32: Tutsirai Patricia Makuvachuma LLB Dissertation

32

excludes “equal protection and anti-discrimination provisions practices pertaining to marriage,

divorce, devolution of property, and other personal and family matters”.128 African customary

law and human rights are intrinsically incompatible because “human rights emphasise the

individual while customary law emphasises the group or community; customary law stresses

duties, human rights regimes normally stresses rights; and customary law is imbued with the

principle of patriarchy which means that any freedoms of thought, speech, movement or

association are qualified by the respect due to all senior men”.129 In these areas of critical

concern for women, the law legitimizes a discriminatory customary system.

The high court in the case of Sarah Longwe v Intercontinental Hotels has shown its willingness

to rely on international treaties which have not yet been incorporated into domestic law.130 In

that case the late Justice Musumali had this to say:

‘… I have to say something about the effect of international treaties which the Republic

of Zambia enters into and ratifies. Ratification of such documents by a nation state

without reservation is a clear testimony of the willingness by that state to be bound by

the provisions of such a document. Since there is that willingness, if an issue comes

before this court which would not be covered by local legislation but would be covered

by such international documents. I would take judicial notice of the treaty or convention

in my resolution of the dispute.’

All the above ratifications by Zimbabwe are ostensibly an effort to ensure that women are

included in the development process and that their basic fundamental rights are protected.

However, a closer examination of the situation in Zimbabwe will show that many of these

pieces of legislation have not gone beyond mere rhetoric. This is particularly evident when the

Constitution of Zimbabwe is taken into consideration. Section 327 (2) b of the constitution

states that the government is not obliged to domesticate any international convention, unless

they have been passed by an act of parliament.

128 Richardson (note94 above) 3. 129 Bennett TW “The compatibility of African customary law and human rights” (1991) Acta Juridica 23. 130 Machina (note 4 above) 9.

Page 33: Tutsirai Patricia Makuvachuma LLB Dissertation

33

3. Regional Law

3.1 Protocol to the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights on the Rights

of Women in Africa (the Protocol) and Non-Disccrimination

The Protocol to the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights on the Rights of Women

in Africa (the Protocol)131 was adopted as a response to human rights abuses that African

women faced across the continent. The African Charter on Human and People’s Rights (the

Charter) was found to be inadequate in addressing the socio-economic plight of women despite

various provisions.132 The Charter failed to achieve any progress for women because it

pertained to the public arena and not the private realm.133 In the Zambian and Zimbabwean

constitutions guarantee equality, but this does not pertain to customary which is considered to

be part of private law. Secondly, the Charter values African traditions, without considering that

these traditions uphold harmful practices such as male primogeniture regarding inheritance

laws.134 In the context access to land, most widows are considered practically landless once

their husbands die and are subjected to property grabbing by the relatives. The land titling

system consists of laws and policies that are biased in favour of male-headed households.

The Protocol describes ‘discrimination against women’ as ‘any distinction, exclusion or

restriction based on sex, or any other differential treatment whose objective or effects

compromise or destroy the recognition, enjoyment or the exercise by women, regardless of

their marital status, or human rights and fundamental freedoms in all spheres of life”.135 Article

2 provides for gender equality, mandating states to combat all forms of discrimination against

women through appropriate legislative, institutional and other measures.136 Specifically, the

measures taken should ensure the principle of equality between men and women, and prohibit

all forms of harmful practices which endanger the health and general well-being of women and

girls. Importantly, it is required that the principle of equality be included in the constitution or

131 The Protocol to the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights on the Rights of Woman in Africa of

2005 (The Protocol). 132 Article 2 stated that everyone enjoys the rights of the Charter without distinction on grounds of sex; Article 3

states that everyone shall be equal before the law and shall be entitled to equal protection of the law; Article 18

guarantees family protection and prohibits discrimination against women in the context of the family. 133 Oder J ’Reclaiming women’s social and economic rights in Africa’ (2004) Vol 5(4) ESR Review 14. 134 Ibid. 135 The Protocol. 136 Ebeku K ‘Considering the Protocol on the Rights of Women in Africa’ (2006) Vol 36(1) Africa Insight 25.

Page 34: Tutsirai Patricia Makuvachuma LLB Dissertation

34

statutes of states, and they are obliged to ensure its “effective application”.137 This is a pivotal

obligation because most constitutions’ in Africa advocate for equality and non-discrimination,

but the lived reality is that women in those countries continue to suffer gender-based

discrimination and unequal treatment. Fundamentally, this duty recognises that it will take

more than legal provision to achieve gender equality and non-discrimination in Africa.

Furthermore, states have an obligation to take positive action in those areas where

discrimination against women continues to exist, and change the social and cultural patterns of

conduct through specific actions (such as public education) to achieve the elimination of

harmful cultural and traditional practices.138

Article 6(j) states that women have the right to acquire administer and manage property during

marriage. Furthermore, in matters of separation, divorce and annulment of marriage, they have

an equitable share of the property.139 Women and men shall have the right to an equitable

sharing of the joint property deriving from the marriage. It is important to note that before the

Protocol was adopted, women married under customary or religious in many African societies

had no right to divorce; the right was only available to men, and divorce could be for any reason

whatsoever – or for no reason at all.140 Moreover, upon divorce or separation, African women

married under customary or religious law had no right to any property acquired during

marriage, even if they had contributed financially to its acquisition. Therefore, the execution

of Article 7 is intended to reverse these unequal and discriminatory positions. Article 21(1)

recognises that widows have the right to live and retain ownership of the matrimonial home

and have the same inheritance laws as men. However, in terms of housing rights, customary

law is not specifically referred to.141

Zambia has taken legislative and administrative steps that conform with the provisions

international instruments similar to the Protocol. In its Concluding Observations and

Comments published in 2002 on Zambia’s periodic report, the Committee on the Elimination

of Discrimination Against Women remarked positively

137 Article 2 of the Protocol. 138 Ebeku (note 136 above) 25. 139 Article 7(d) of the Protocol. 140 Ebeku (note 136 above) 26. 141 Oder (note 133 above) 14.

Page 35: Tutsirai Patricia Makuvachuma LLB Dissertation

35

“the country’s efforts to strengthen the national machinery on women and the

introduction of gender mainstreaming; the adoption of several policies and programmes

to eliminate discrimination against women – for example, the National Gender Policy

and the establishment of the Gender in Development Division under the Office of the

President; efforts to review existing laws that discriminate against women including the

enactment of the Marriage Act and the Intestate Succession Act”.142

Zambian local court, in a landmark judgment held that women married under customary law

have an equal right to a share of marital property in the event of the divorce or death of her

husband, thus reversing the custom which denies women a share of property irrespective of

whether she had contributed to its acquisition.143

In analysing the Protocol, it is worth assessing whether women have indeed benefitted from

these provisions. Although Zambia and Zimbabwe have ratified the Protocol, there has not

been any domestic implementation regarding women’s access to land. The downfall of

conventions is that there are no sanctions or penalties that befall any ratifying country to hold

them accountable for their obligation. Even with the current wave of ‘democracy’ on the

African continent, customary laws continuously exacerbate the plight of human in terms of

equality. Although there was an African Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights that was

established as a result of the Protocol to the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights on

the Establishment of an African Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights in 1998, Zambia and

Zimbabwe have not recognised the competence of the Court to receive cases Non-

governmental organisations (NGOs) and individuals.144

Weaknesses of the Protocol

An important concern of the Protocol is that it does not provide guidance as to implementation

within the domestic courts of states. Furthermore, it does not create a distinction between

statutory, customary and living law, an important tenet for the purposes of this paper.145 This

142 Ebeku (note 136 above) 28. 143 Zambia: Landmark Judgment for Women in Customary Marriages’, IRIN, 21 December 2005, (accessed 14

July 2016) http://allafrica.com/stories/200512210499.html. 144 Ebeku (note 136 above) 30. 145 Davis K ‘Emperor is Still Naked: Why the Protocol on the Rights of Women in Africa Leaves Women

Exposed to More Discrimination’ (2009) Vol 42 Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 963.

Page 36: Tutsirai Patricia Makuvachuma LLB Dissertation

36

vagueness undoubtedly leads to broad leeway for states to interpret the provisions loosely and

ineffectively. Both Zambia and Zimbabwe have both constitutional and customary praxis’s;

the amalgamation of the two is problematic because they often exist at opposite ends of the

justice spectrum. Customary law is based on rules and norms that have been accepted into a

society over a long period of time. This includes cultural traditions that are usually established

along ethnic or tribal lines.146 As established throughout this paper, customary law is often in

conflict with statutory law. Where statutory law focuses on “obligations and privileges created

by the constitution and legislation, customary law represents traditions, rules and culture that

has evolved over time”.147 The Protocol addresses customary law in a generally negative

manner because most customary traditions perpetuate a culture of discrimination against

women. Although there are specifically prohibited practices, states may elect to have

reservations to certain articles in order to allow for harmful customs. On the other hand,

although the states may accept the prohibitions in writing, they may fail to enforce it

domestically.

The major weakness of the Protocol is that it does not contain substantive provisions; rather it

imposes obligations on states to take necessary measures to realise the stated rights. The

disadvantage with imposing obligations on states is that the content of the rights (at the

domestic level) is dependent on the economic position and capability of the particular states,

and this may be problematic to persons who want to bring an action before courts claiming

violations of their rights. Thus, there may be national government budgets that may inhibit the

Protocol for being enforced. Furthermore, the state may claim the sanctity of its cultural and

traditional beliefs. With women’s access to customary land, a state may state that traditions do

not necessarily discriminate against women because they are the views of society. The danger

here is that if ratification and implementation fail, there is a possibility that rights will be

ignored in future.

There is a lack of implementation for three reasons. Firstly, the country does not sign or ratify

the Protocol. Secondly, the state ratifies but fails to include it domestically. Thirdly, a country

may ratify the Protocol and domesticate it, but fail to enforce the provisions. On these three

levels, there are far-reaching and damaging effects on women’s rights. In most countries, the

146 Davis (note 145 above) 970. 147 Davis (note 145 above) 971.

Page 37: Tutsirai Patricia Makuvachuma LLB Dissertation

37

Protocol is viewed as a declaration rather than an instrument that is legally binding.148 When

a country fails to enforce the Protocol after ratification, it is highly likely that gender inequality.

In most cases, the consequences are worse when implementation is not done efficiently because

it is as if the Protocol was never signed to begin with. This is because ambiguous or vague

laws are open it abuse and misuse.

On a theoretical level, an instrument that targets a particular group acknowledges that that

group is in need of protection. The Protocol thus perpetuates the stereotype that women are

vulnerable and weaker.149 This may inhibit women from realising their potential in other

spaces.

3.2 The Southern African Development Community Protocol on Gender and

Development with regard to land

Regional economic communities (RECs) were originally created with an economic function,

but they have also included human rights protections under their mandate.150 SADC151 has

adopted a treaty that addresses gender and development. However, this has been under scrutiny

as it bears a close resemblance to the Protocol. The aim is to develop and implement 6 main

goals;

(i) eliminate discrimination and achieve gender equality;152

(ii) harmonise and co-ordinate the implementation of the various obligations imposed

by the instruments to which SADC member states have subscribed;153

(iii) address emerging gender issues and concerns and fill gaps where existing treaties

are inadequate or insufficient;154

(iv) set realistic, measurable targets, time frames and indicators for achieving gender

equality and equity;155

148 Davis (note 145 above) 975. 149 Davis (note 145 above) 964. 150 Forere M & Stone L ‘The SADC Protocol on Gender and Development: Duplication or complementarily of

the African Union Protocol on Women’s Rights (2009) 9 African Human Rights Law Journal 438. 151 The SADC Protocol on Gender and Development was signed in August 2008 but has yet to enter into force

as not a single SADC member state has ratified the Protocol. 152 SADC Gender art 3(a). 153 SADC Gender Protocol art 3(b). 154 SADC Gender Protocol art 3(c). 155 SADC Gender Protocol art 3(d).

Page 38: Tutsirai Patricia Makuvachuma LLB Dissertation

38

(v) strengthen, monitor and evaluate the progress made by the member states towards

reaching the targets and goals set out in the Protocol;156 and

(vi) deepen regional integration, attain sustainable development.157

The SADC Gender Protocol provides for a review of policies to cater for access to, and control

of productive resources such as water, property and land.158 The implementation mechanism is

a reporting mechanism which is an individual complaints system. The SADC Tribunal is

established under the SADC Treaty to ensure adherence to and proper interpretation of the

provisions of the SADC Treaty and subsidiary instruments and to adjudicate upon such disputes

as may be referred to it.159 The Treaty provides that judges shall be appointed from nationals

of states who possess the qualifications required for appointment to the highest judicial offices

of their respective states or who are jurists of recognised competence.

The majority of the provisions in the Protocol have been repeated in the SADC Gender

Protocol, thus amounting to a redundancy of efforts and a misdirection of scarce resources

which could have been invested elsewhere. Ideally, the SADC should have adopted a plan of

action to effectively and uniformly implement the African Women’s Protocol.160 In addition,

given that the SADC has settled for weaker implementation mechanism in compared to those

of the AU, and has further increased the burden on states with regard to reporting, it was indeed

inappropriate to adopt a treaty which weakens the already existing treaties that are equally

binding on SADC member states.

4. Domestic law

4.1 The Constitution of Zambia

The Zambian Constitution in section 51 gives women and men the equal right to treatment an

opportunity as well as right to inherit won, administer and control property.161 At the same

time, however, the constitution explicitly excludes from this provision, personal law - such as

156 SADC Gender Protocol art 3(e). 157 SADC Gender Protocol art 3(f). 158 SADC Gender Protocol art 18. 159 SADC Gender Protocol art 16(1). 160 Forere and Stone (note 150 above) 458. 161 Section 51 of the Zambian Constitution.

Page 39: Tutsirai Patricia Makuvachuma LLB Dissertation

39

that concerning inheritance of property - and the application of customary law. In the past,

customary law provided some safeguards to protect women’s access to (though not control

over) land. However, these safeguards rarely operate today.162 This illustrates that although

there are ethnic differences in bodies of customary law and these have changed through time,

an over-riding commonality is that women are treated as minors who are subordinate to men -

fathers, uncles, brothers and husbands.

The constitution defines discrimination as:

“affording different treatment to different persons attributable, wholly or mainly to their

respective descriptions by race, tribe, sex, place of origin, marital status, whereby

persons of one such description are subjected to disabilities or restrictions to which

persons of another such description are not made subject to or are accorded privileges

or advantages which are not accorded to persons of another such description”.163

Article 23(4)(c) exempts a number of laws from the provisions of article 23(1) and provides

that:

(a) Clause 1 shall not apply to any law so far as that law makes provision:

(c) with respect to adoption, marriage, divorce, burial, devolution or property on death

or other matters of personal law

(d) for the application in the case of members of a particular race or tribe of customary

law with respect to any matter to the exclusion of any law with respect to that matter

which is applicable in the case of other person; or

(e) whereby persons of any such description as is mentioned in clause (3) may be

subjected to any disability or restriction or may be accorded any privilege or advantage

which having regard to its nature and to special circumstances pertaining to those

persons or to persons of any such other description is reasonably justifiable in a

democratic society.

The laws exempted by article 23(4) are in issues that directly affect women in general and

widows in particular. It is evident therefore that women’s enjoyment of fundamental freedoms

including the right to access customary land guaranteed by the constitution is greatly restricted.

162 Machina (note 4 above) 9. 163 Article23 of the Zambian Constitution.

Page 40: Tutsirai Patricia Makuvachuma LLB Dissertation

40

Article 23(4)(e) legitimizes the traditional position, which accorded widows fewer privileges

than men in matters concerning their families, marriage and succession. Thus although the

Intestate Succession Act seeks to give both men and women equal rights in matters of

succession, this would pose problems with the constitution.164 Therefore if women’s rights or

widows rights for that matter, were specifically protected by constitutional provisions,

legislation would follow suit and the status of widows would be ameliorated in relation to their

right to inherit and in turn have access to customary land.

A case involving a 79-year-old women in Monze, Zambia illustrates that widows are especially

vulnerable as a result of customary land tenure.165 Theresa Chilala’s husband died in 1990 and

she refused to be sexually cleansed according the Tonga traditional custom. As result, her in

laws drove her off her husband’s property and took away her livelihood, thus forcing her to

move to a new homestead. Moreover, after having moved, her in laws continued to bury bodies

of their relatives on her new property.166 To seek legal redress, Chilala approached the Law

and Development Association who referred her to Zambia’s Lands Tribunal. The Lands

Tribunal is a national court that focuses on customary and traditional law. The Tribunal ruled

against Chilala. The Justice for Widows and Orphans Organisation organised a meeting with

Chieftainess Nkomesha as well as the chiefs from the southern provinces. In 2006, the chiefs

banned Chilala’s in laws from entering onto her new property and burying any more people

there.167Therefore, even though Zambia is party to CEDAW, Zambian customary law

continues to be discriminatory as it forcibly evicts widows and orphans.

4.2 The Constitution of Zimbabwe

National constitutions represent an important framework that links international and domestic

human rights standards. Before the amendment of the current constitution, the Zimbabwean

Supreme Court in Rattigan and Others v Chief Immigration Officer and Others168 dealt with

164 Machina (note 4 above) 9. 165 Hambuba, C (2006) ‘Zambian Widow Defies Custom and Life Amid Graves’

http://womensenews.org/2006/11/zambian-widow-defies-custom-and-life-amid-graves/ (accessed 10 August

2016). 166 Ibid. 167 Ibid 168 1994 (2) ZLR 54 (SC).

Page 41: Tutsirai Patricia Makuvachuma LLB Dissertation

41

section 23 and it was argued that this section did not specifically mention sex as a prohibited

basis for discrimination although section 11 stated that all persons were entitled to all

fundamental rights.

The founding values of the amended Constitution declares that the state must promote must

promote the full participation of women in every sphere of Zimbabwean society. Section 56

guarantees equality and non-discrimination;

“(1) all persons are equal before the law and has the right to equal protection and benefit

of the law

(2) Women and men have the right to equal treatment, including the right to equal

opportunities in political, economic, cultural and social spheres.

(3) Everyone has the right not to be treated in an unfairly discriminatory manner on

such grounds as their nationality, race, colour tribe, birth or place of birth, ethnic or

social origin, language, class, religious belief, political or other opinion, custom,

culture, sex, gender, marital status, age, disability or natural difference or condition or

economic, social or other status.”

Furthermore, Section 80 states that customs and cultural practices that infringe on the rights of

women conferred by the constitution are void to the extent of the infringement. 169 The

Constitution also establishes and sets out functions of Gender Commission

“There is a Gender Commission which has the following functions-

(a) to monitor issues concerning gender equality to ensure gender equality as provided

in this Constitution;

(b) to investigate possible violations of rights relating to gender;

(c) to conduct research into issues relating to gender and social justice, and to

recommend changes to laws and practices which lead to discrimination based on

gender.

(d) to advise public and private institutions on steps to be taken to ensure gender

equality;

(e) to recommend affirmative action programmes achieve gender equality;

169 Section 80 of Zimbabwean Constitution.

Page 42: Tutsirai Patricia Makuvachuma LLB Dissertation

42

(f) to do everything necessary to promote gender equality and to prevent gender

discrimination”.

The lack of access to land for the bulk of Zimbabwean women is based in the laws regulating

access to matrimonial property. Although men and women have the same capacity to acquire

freehold tenure, there is inequality in access to education and employment which makes them

unable to realise their rights fully.170 In terms of the Communal Land, this is allocated by the

District Council in terms of customary law. This results in women not having equal access to

customary land and has to leave the house and land after divorce.171 It is clear that the law

regarding the access to communal land is discriminatory against married women.

4.3 The Case of Magaya v Magaya

This case addressed the issue of inheritance and was presided over the Deed Act. Veneria

Magaya was denied inheritance over her father’s deceased estate on the grounds that she was

a woman.172 The Supreme Court of Zimbabwe stated that “a lady cannot be appointed heir to

her father’s estate when there is a man in the family who is entitled to it”.173 The court

proceeded to rule in father of Veneria’s step-brother younger brother from a second marriage.

This case illustrates that an unmarried woman does not have protection against land

discrimination. Despite the fact that land is essential to the survival of women, Zimbabwean

women still face inequality with regard land rights. 174

The “second-class” status reflected in the Magaya is evident and discriminatory. As suggested

by the court's understanding on constitutional interpretation to justify ongoing socio-legal

repression towards women, the inconsistencies in the application of gender rights and

protections in the constitution itself may demonstrate a broader social and legal uncertainty

about the status of women despite political promises of equality.175

170 Ncube W‘Defending and Protecting Gender Equality and the Family Law Under a Decidedly Undecided

Constitution in Zimbabwe’ (1997) Vol 14 Zimbabwe Law Review 15. 171 Ncube (note 167 above) 15. 172 Magaya v. Magaya, (1999) 3 L.R.C 35, 40 (SC) (hereafter Magaya) 173 Ibid. 174 Shumba (note 114 above) 240. 175 Knobelsdorf (note 74 above) 7.

Page 43: Tutsirai Patricia Makuvachuma LLB Dissertation

43

The legal implications included the right against discrimination. Magaya argued that the court

should “exercise its discretionary law-making role to ensure that women were not excluded

from being appointed heiresses at customary law.”176 The court, by denying this discretionary

judicial approach, threw the status of Zimbabwean women into question, essentially

determining that “even unmarried women are more likely to be property than to own it ... [and]

holding that the ‘nature of African society’ dictates that women are not equal to men, especially

in family relationships.” 177 Perhaps even more legally troubling, the court's favouring of a right

to the application of discriminatory customary law sets a strong legal precedent. The Magaya

decision clearly established a precedent that supports the constitutional legality of

discrimination on the basis of sex, and subsequent amendments to the constitution of

Zimbabwe have maintained these “blanket exceptions to gender discrimination”.178 The right

to economic opportunity of women is also a factor in this case because it shows that gender

inequality hinders economic development of women.

Conclusion

African women have undergone human rights abuses and gender-based discrimination of

various kinds. For instance, they suffer violence in the private arena, and in the public arena

they have been virtually denied participation in governance and decision-making bodies in their

countries. This situation has persisted for decades, in spite of the existence of international and

regional human rights, which are binding on most, if not all, African states. The ratification of

instruments existence of those instruments has not positively changed the status of African

women. International, regional and domestic laws ought to work simultaneously to achieve the

goal of gender equality and non-discrimination. States are therefore under an obligation to

ensure that all aspects of substantive and procedural law relating to the legal status of women,

family and succession are compatible with the human rights norms and standards contained in

the treaties she has ratified. The application by the courts of the principles of international law,

such as those affecting the equality of spouses in various areas of family law, is therefore not

only expected but justified and appropriate.

176 Magaya para 41 177 Magaya Para 51. 178 Knobelsdorf (note 74 above) 9.

Page 44: Tutsirai Patricia Makuvachuma LLB Dissertation

44

The constitution, as the supreme law is obligated to advance women and entrench their rights

in the country’s laws. Any constitution should acknowledge the fact that men and women are

different but that gender equality should denote equal opportunities. Neutral positions may

work for the benefit of one group at the expense of another. There is need for the constitution

to articulate women's rights to the extent that sex and marital status are also provided for in the

constitution. On the domestic front, states have failed women by not affording them rights that

are guaranteed in the constitution. The failure of the constitution means that there is a

systematic discrimination and inequitable laws in customary law. Such laws exist in the

regulation of access to customary land which excludes women from having direct secure access

to land in these tenure systems

Page 45: Tutsirai Patricia Makuvachuma LLB Dissertation

45

Chapter 5: Conclusion and Recommendations

Conclusion

This paper has established that the status of women in Zambia and Zimbabwe has been

secondary to men from before colonial times. The ideology of patriarchy is the underlying

problem that has led to the plight of women. It is important that a restructuring of societal

systems be embarked on to illustrate the lived realities of the relationship between men and

women. The complexity of customary law and its tenure of land have to be shifted in manner

that equality of access to land is realised. Furthermore, it is important to acknowledge the link

between women and land, and the amount of labour women exude in contribution to the family,

and the nation as a whole.

The allocation of land in Zambia and Zimbabwe has been discriminatory throughout history.

A timeline of the history of land tenure systems in both countries show that women always

have a starting point that is based on inequality. This paper has illustrated that the allocation of

customary land is done through customary law, administered by leader such as chiefs and

headmen. Inheritance of land is the most prevalent way that women have been excluded from

accessing customary land, and it is discriminatory and unequal.

International, regional and domestic legal frameworks shape the discourse on human rights.

Issues regarding ratification, implementation and enforcement hamper progress in the

realisation of women’s right to access land. The various bodies must establish strict

mechanisms to hold states accountable in order for women’s status to be elevated to point of

equality in all spheres of life, to uphold their dignity.

Page 46: Tutsirai Patricia Makuvachuma LLB Dissertation

46

Recommendations

The recommendations made pertain to the recognition of the fact that women need to gain

access to customary land but also go beyond access and strive for control and ownership.

Women’s land rights should be an inalienable human right;

A. Joint access to land.

The title deed to land should include names of both spouses under customary

law over customary land. This allows for security of tenure that when a husband

dies, the wife can still have a claim to the land.

B. Head of the household

There must be a complete debunking of the genderisation of household heads.

This includes a change in mindset that a man has a higher status than a woman.

This can be done through education in rural areas, where people such as chiefs

and headmen are also included in the discourse.

Women have to be taught about customary practices from a young age,

conscientising the positive and negative aspects of customary law on their

womanhood.

C. Inheritance laws

On the death of a spouse. A woman should be able to inherit her spouses land.

D. Implementation and enforcement of international and regional instruments

States must be held accountable for ratifying instruments mechanisms must be

set in place to penalise states that continue do not adhere to the treaties.

Economic sanctions can be administered against states that continue practising

customary law that is discriminatory to against women.

E. Women’s rights activists, NGO’s, the church and traditional healers.

Creation of programmes to deal with land administration and access to justice

F. Role of civil society

Set up campaigns to change the attitudes of both men and women towards

women. This is done through information gathering and sharing lived

experiences through dialogue.

G. Role of government

Page 47: Tutsirai Patricia Makuvachuma LLB Dissertation

47

Programmes must be initiated to in from members of parliament, local

authorities and law enforcement on the negative effects of customary practices.

This is done to ensure that rights are protected.

Page 48: Tutsirai Patricia Makuvachuma LLB Dissertation

48

Bibliography

Books

Armstrong A and Ncube WK (eds) Women and Law in Southern Africa (1987)

Zimbabwe Publishing House.

Bennett TM A Sourcebook of African Customary Law for Southern Africa 1991) Cape

Town: Juta and Co.

Donzwa B, Ncube W & Stewart J “What law? What law? Playing with the rules” in

Cube W &Stewart (eds) Widowhood, Inheritance Law, Customs and Practices in

Southern Africa (1995) WLSA Harare.

Griffiths, A ‘Networking resources: a gendered perspective on Kwena Women’s

property rights’ in H, Lim & A, Bottomley (2007) Feminist Perspectives on Land Law.

Higgins T,& Fenrich J ‘Customary Law, Gender Equality, and the Family: The Promise

and limits of a Choice Paradigm’ in J Fenrich, P Galizzi & T Higgins (2011) The Future

of African Customary Law .

Kameri-Mbote P (2005) ‘The land has its owners: gender issues in land tenure under

customary law in Kenya. International Environmental Law Research Centre.

Kameri-Mbote P, Hellum A, & Nyamweya P ‘Pathways to real access to land-related

resources for women in in A Tsanga & J Steward, Women in Law: innovative

approaches to teaching, research and analysis.

Scoones, I., Marongwe, M., Mavengedze, N., Murimbarimba, F., Mahenehene, J. &

Sukume, C, (2011) Zimbabwe’s Land Reform: A summary of findings. Brighton.

Shiva, V (2005) Earth Democracy.

Journals and presented papers

Albertyn C ‘The stubborn persistence of patriarchy? Gender and cultural diversity in

South Africa’ (2009) 2 Constitutional Court Review 171.

Bennett TW “The compatibility of African customary law and human rights” (1991)

Acta Juridica 23.

Bhatasara, S ‘Women’s Land and Poverty in Zimbabwe: Deconstructing the Impacts of

the Fast Track Land Reform Program’ (2011) Vol 13(1) Journal of Sustainable

Development in Africa 324.

Page 49: Tutsirai Patricia Makuvachuma LLB Dissertation

49

Chabu D ‘A critical analysis of the efficacy of the Intestate Succession Act chapter 59

of the Laws of Zambia protecting the right of widows (2005) University of Zimbabwe.4

Classens A & Mnisi S ‘Rural women redefining land rights in the context of the living

customary law’ (2009) 25 SAJHR 495.

Davis K ‘Emperor is Still Naked: Why the Protocol on the Rights of Women in Africa

Leaves Women Exposed to More Discrimination’ (2009) Vol 42 Vanderbilt Journal of

Transnational Law 963.

Ebeku K ‘Considering the Protocol on the Rights of Women in Africa’ (2006) Vol 36(1)

Africa Insight 25.

Gaidzwana R Women and Land in Zimbabwe,(2011) University of Zimbabwe. Paper

Presented at the Conference “Why women matter in agriculture”, Sweden.

Forere M & Stone L ‘The SADC Protocol on Gender and Development: Duplication or

complementarily of the African Union Protocol on Women’s Rights (2009) 9 African

Human Rights Law Journal 438.

Goredema, R ‘African feminism: the African woman’s struggle for identity’ (2010) Vol

1 African Yearbook of Rhetoric: Gender Rhetoric: North-South 34.

Hambuba, C (2006) ‘Zambian Widow Defies Custom and Life Amid Graves’

http://womensenews.org/2006/11/zambian-widow-defies-custom-and-life-amid-

graves/ (accessed 10 August 2016).

Hasungule M (2001)’The 1995 Land Act: An obstacle or instrument of development?

Briefing paper prepared for The Zambian Land Alliance.

Human Rights Commission ‘Right to adequate housing with a perspective from

selected areas in Zambia. (2009). State of Human Rights Report in Zambia.

Knobelsdorf V “Zimbabwe’s Magaya Decision Revisited: Women’s Rights and Land

Succession in the International Context” (2006) 15 Columbia Journal of Gender and

Law 749.

Odeny M ‘Improving Access to Land and strengthening Women’s land rights in Africa’

Presentation at the Annual World Bank Conference on Land and Poverty (2013) The

World Bank- Washington DC, April 8-11, 2013 p 6.

Oder J ’Reclaiming women’s social and economic rights in Africa’ (2004) Vol 5(4)

ESR Review 14.

Page 50: Tutsirai Patricia Makuvachuma LLB Dissertation

50

Machina R Women’s Land Rights in Zambia: Policy Provisions, Legal Framework and

Constraints (2002), Presented at The Regional Conference on Women’s Land Rights

from 26 May t0 30 May, 2002 in Harare, Zimbabwe.

Mbatha “Reforming the Customary Law of Succession” (2002) 18 South African

Journal of Human Rights 259.

Moyo, C ‘Rural Women and Land, the Inseparable Twins: A Case of South Africa’

(2013) 11(2) Gender and Behavior 5396.

Meinzen-Dick R, Kameri-Mbote P and MarkelovaH, (2009)” Property Rights for

poverty reduction” in J Von Braun, RV Hill and Pandya-Lorch (eds) The Poorest and

Hungry: Assessments, Analyses and Actions, An IFPRI 2020 Book. Washington: IFPRI.

Mushunje, M Women’s Land Rights in Zimbabwe (2001), University of Zimbabwe.

Ncube W‘Defending and Protecting Gender Equality and the Family Law Under a

Decidedly Undecided Constitution in Zimbabwe’ (1997) Vol 14 Zimbabwe Law Review

15.

Richardson, AB, ‘Women’s Inheritance Rights in Africa: The Need to Integrate

Cultural Understanding and Legal Reform’ (2004) Vol 11(2) Article 6 Human Rights

Brief 19.

Rugege S ‘The right of access to land and its implications in Southern Africa: A

comparative study of South Africa and Zimbabwe land reform laws and programmes’

(2004) 14 Law, Democracy and Development Law Journal 236.

Shumba D ‘Women and Land: A Study of Zimbabwe’ (2011) Vol 13(7) Journal of

Sustainable Development in Africa 239.

Tagliarino N ‘Zambia; Conversions of Customary Lands to Leasehold Titles’.

Walker C ‘Elusive equality: women, property rights and land reform in South Africa’

(2009) 25 SAJHR 469.

Whitehead A & Tsikata D ‘Policy Discourses on Women’s Land Rights in Sub-Saharan

Africa: The implications of the Re-turn to the Customary’(2003) Vol 3(1&2) Journal

for Agrarian Change 68.

Zimbabwe Women’s Resource Centre and Network (1994) The Gender Dimensions of

Access and Land Use Rights in Zimbabwe. Evidence to the Land Commission.

Page 51: Tutsirai Patricia Makuvachuma LLB Dissertation

51

Legislation

Administration of Estates Amendment Act of 1997.

Communal Lands Act of 1981.

Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women of 1981

adopted by the General Assembly resolution 34/180 of 18 December 1979.

Declaration on the Right to Development adopted by the United Nations General

Assembly in Resolution 41/128 of4December 1986: Art 1.

Deeds Registries Act of 1996.

International Covenant on Economic Social and Cultural Rights of 16 December 1966,

Art 11.

Intestate Succession Act 5 of 1989.

Lands Act 1995 of Zambia

The SADC Protocol on Gender and Development was signed in August 2008 but has

yet to enter into force as not a single SADC member state has ratified the Protocol.

The Constitution of Zambia of 1996

The Constitution of Zimbabwe of 2013

The Protocol to the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights on the Rights of

Woman in Africa of 2005 (The Protocol).

Universal Declaration of Human Rights of 1948.

Cases

Magaya v. Magaya, (1999) 3 L.R.C 35, 40 (SC)

Rattigan and Others v Chief Immigration Officer and Others 1994 (2) ZLR 54 (SC)

Sarah Longwe v Intercontinental