Upload
belinda-ward
View
219
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Turkish Research Area and Turkish Research Area and
European Technology PlatformsEuropean Technology Platforms
Hüseyin GülerHüseyin Güler
FP6 Deputy National CoordinatorFP6 Deputy National Coordinator
[email protected]@tubitak.gov.tr
2
Scope
• National competitiveness and science, technology and innovation (STI)
• Progress in STI and new developments in Turkey
• Turkish Participation in FPs and ETPs
3
National Competitiveness*National Competitiveness*
“The degree of which a country can, under free and fair market conditions,
produce goods and services which meet the test of international
markets, while simultaneously maintaining and
expanding the real incomes of its people
over the long term."
*OECD*OECD
4
The Diamond of National Advantage*The Diamond of National Advantage*
Firm Strategy, Structure and Rivalry
FactorConditions
DemandConditions
Related and Supporting Industries
*Porter *Porter
8(*) Turkish State Planning Organization(*) Turkish State Planning Organization
DemographicsDemographics
0-14 Age
15-64 Age
65+ Age
9
Skilled Labor Readily AvailableSkilled Labor Readily Available
* IMD, Competitiveness Year Book, (survey)* IMD, Competitiveness Year Book, (survey)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
EU 15 EU 10 TR USA Japan China
10
International ExperienceInternational Experience of Senior Managers of Senior Managers
* IMD, Competitiveness Year Book, (survey)* IMD, Competitiveness Year Book, (survey)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
EU 15 EU 10 TR USA Japan China
12
Global Market Shares (2002)*
* OECD Main Science and Tech Indicators, 2004/2* OECD Main Science and Tech Indicators, 2004/2
15
• To increase the quality of life in Turkey
• To find solutions to social problems
Main Objectives of Turkish Research Area
* 10. BTYK Kararı (2005/10)
• To increase the competitive power of our country
• To create awareness and interest in STI in the society
16
To increase the share of
R&D expenditures in GDP
Basic Targets of Turkish Research Area
* Supreme Council for Science and Technology, 10. Meeting (Decree 2004/1-3c)c
To increase the demand for R&D
To increase the number and the quality of R&D personnel
17
GERD as Percentage of GDP
In 1967, US : 3.31 %UK : 2.93 %USSR : 2.42 %
In 2003, EU-25 : % 1.81
In 2010, EU-25 : % 3
19
GERD by Performers
Government Private Enterp. Higher Ed.EU-25 (2003) % 14 % 64 % 22TR (2003) % 11 % 23 % 66
20
Year 2004....
• 10. SCST Decree 2004/1-4
– It has been decided that, starting from
the 2005 budget, additional
public funds will be allocated so
that the share of R&D expenditures in GDP
will be increased to 2% by 2010.
21
Direct Public R&D Funds*
* State Planning Organization, Funds for Universties’ Scientific Research Projects, Undersecretariat of the Prime Ministry for Foreign Trade, TUBITAK, TTGV, KOSGEB, FP6, 2005 constant prices
22
DTM-TUBITAK Technology and Innovation Support Programme
As of 15 August 2006 number of project proposals 382 number of firms 279
23
Technology and Innovation Support for Industry*
* Support from TUBITAK, TTGV, and Undersecretariat of the Prime Ministry for Foreign Trade included. Total amount of support is 65,7 million $ as of 15 August 2006.
24
Enhancing International Cooperation
• International Scientific and Technological Cooperation
– Bilateral Cooperation
• 220 Agreements with 80 Countries
– Multilateral Cooperation
• 3 regional cooperation, membership to 43 International Institutions
Association with the EU Framework Programmes
25
Evaluation of EU Framework Programmes
Advantages of Participation
Contribution to EU Integration process
Access to new technologies
Opportunity for SMEs to enter external
markets
Opportunity of technology transfer
Involvement in the process of setting
new standards
The Cost of Non-Participation
To fall behind technological
developments.
Barriers for Effective Participation Low capacity for project production
Intense competition between the countries
Lack of experience in doing business with the
EU bureaucracy
Visa problem (Especially for SMEs and Industry)
Caveats Guiding Human Resources
Transformation of knowledge into
competitive power
Enhancing industry participation
Participation of universities and industry in
joint projects
26
Preparing for FP7
• EU Framework Programmes National Coordination System
strengthened.
• Structure of TÜBİTAK Framework Programmes National
Coordination reinforced.
– Number of employees exceeds 30.
– Strategy and targets of the office identified.
– An extensive database was established.
• Legal and financial regulations for Turkey’s use of funds
formulated.
27
• Trainings on Project Proposal Writing and Project Management
– 350 experts (2005)
– 800 experts (2006)
• Project Proposal Rewards Programme (More than 500 projects supported)
Preparing for FP7
28
• Travel and Meeting Supports (over 150 researchers)
• Publishing promotion ve training documents (27,000 copies in 2005-06)
• Turkish Researchers Catalogue
Preparing for FP7
29
FP7 TRAINING SEMINAR"The Project Cycle: Technical, Administrative, Financial and Legal Aspects of FP7 Project Preparation and Completion“
• Two days event• For 200 participants• Jointly organised by DG-INFSO and TÜBİTAK
October 30-31, 2006
ISTANBULContact: Ebru Basak
ICT Activities
+90 312 468 53 00 /3928
[email protected]://fp7ictevent.tubitak.gov.tr
30
European Technology Platforms
• ETPs: a way to take part in EUs RTD agenda.
• Enhanced involvement of Turkish industry in European
Technology Platforms is needed.
• Focus on areas where it has already expertise and
technological infrastructure.
31
European Technology Platforms
• Highly potential companies could be the core element to ensure success on FP7 and European Technology Platforms.
• Turkey intents to participate in the initiatives and actions under Article 169, Article 171, and
Joint Technology Initiatives. • National Technology Platforms could be in
discussed in line with the National Science and Technology Strategy (2005-2010)