Tuesday, January 15, 1991 · 2015-06-16 · Tuesday, January 15, 1991 Council Chambers Municipal Hall 14245 - 56 Avenue Surrey, B.C. Tuesday, January 15, 1991 ... Item PR1 Issues

January 15, 1991

file:///C|/Users/GB3/Desktop/bylaw%20project/All%20HTML%20Files/11514.html[05/06/2015 4:13:51 PM]

Tuesday, January 15, 1991

Council ChambersMunicipal Hall14245 - 56 AvenueSurrey, B.C.Tuesday, January 15, 1991Time: 6:08 p.m.

Present: Acting Mayor Ralston, Alderman Schrenk, Alderman Hunt, AldermanHigginbotham, Alderman Villeneuve and Alderman Fomich. Alderman Watkinsentered the meeting as indicated in the minutes.

Absent: Alderman Robinson and Mayor Bose.

StaffPresent: Municipal Manager, Director of Planning & Development Services,School Board Planner, Assistant Municipal Engineer - Land Development,Deputy Municipal Clerk, and M. Jones - Administrative Assistant.

A. MANAGER'S REPORT

The Municipal Manager's Report of January 8, 1991, was considered and dealt with as follows:

Alderman Watkins entered the meeting at 6:10 p.m.

Item PR1 Issues Raised by the Sherrell Holdings Ltd. Development Proposal (5690-0164-00)

The Municipal Manager submitted a report from the Director of Planning and DevelopmentServices concerning issues raised by the Sherrell Holdings Ltd. Development Proposal.

The Director of Planning and Development Services was recommending that the applicationremain tabled and staff be instructed to negotiate with the applicant a comprehensivedevelopment scheme as suggested in this report.

The Municipal Manager was recommending that the application remain tabled and that staff beinstructed to negotiate with the applicant a comprehensive development scheme which wouldinclude high rise development, but should not exceed an overall density of 2.5 FSR, representinga blend of C-C(3.5) zoning which already exists on the front portion of the site, and RM-3(1.5),which would be the maximum allowable under this strategy for the rear portion of the site,currently zoned R-F and R-F(D).

It was Moved by Alderman Hunt

January 15, 1991


Seconded by Alderman HigginbothamThat the application remain tabled and that staff be instructed to negotiate with the applicant acomprehensive development scheme which would include high rise development, but should not exceedan overall density of 2.5 F.S.R., representing a blend of C-C(3.5) zoning which already exists on thefront portion of the site, and RM-3 (1.5), which would be the maximum allowable under this strategyfor the rear portion of the site, currently zoned R-F and R-F(D).

RES.91-244 Carried with Alderman Fomich against.

Item No. PR2 Rezoning from RS to R-F(R) - Fred & Elaine Wutzke16244 - 88 Avenue - Four SingleFamily Lots (5689-0646-00)

The Municipal Manager submitted a report from the Director of Planning and DevelopmentServices concerning rezoning from RS to R-F(R) of property at 16255 - 88 Avenue into foursingle family lots.

The Director of Planning and Development Services was recommending that this application beapproved to proceed for rezoning from RS to R-F(R) under Section 963 of the Municipal Act,subject to:

1. Submission of a subdivision layout to the satisfaction of the Approving Officer;

2. Resolution of servicing requirements to the satisfaction of the Municipal Engineer; and

3. Input and approval from Provincial and Federal Fisheries.

The Municipal Manager concurred with the recommendation of the Director of Planning andDevelopment Services.


Seconded by Alderman FomichThat this application be approved to proceed for rezoning from RS to R-F(R) under Section 963 of theMunicipal Act, subject to:

1. Submission of a subdivision layout to the satisfaction of the Approving Officer;

2. Resolution of servicing requirements to the satisfaction of the Municipal Engineer; and

3. Input and approval from Provincial and Federal Fisheries.

RES.91-245 Carried

Item No. PR3 Public Hearing September 17, 1990 Zoning By-law Amendment No. 10622 - Wm.

January 15, 1991


Kerr

The Municipal Manager submitted a report from the Director of Planning & DevelopmentServices concerning Surrey Zoning By-law, 1979, No. 5942, Amendment By-law, 1990, No.10622.

The report indicated that Council tabled By-law No. 10622, pending a report on parkrequirements for the area and landscaping. The information was provided to the November 19,1990 Special Council meeting, and as a consequence Council may now consider third reading.

The Director of Planning & Development Services was recommending that Council proceed withthird reading of Surrey Zoning By-law, 1979, No. 5942, Amendment By-law, 1990, No. 10622.

The Municipal Manager concurred with the recommendation of the Municipal Manager.


Seconded by Alderman FomichThat Council proceed with third reading of Surrey Zoning By-law, 1979, No. 5942, Amendment By-law,1990, No. 10622.

RES.91-246 Carried

Item No. PR4 B&B Contracting Ltd. - 17223 & 17295 - 56 Avenue (5689-0306)

The Municipal Manager submitted a report concerning B&B Contacting Ltd. at 17223 & 17295- 56 Avenue.

It was agreed that the Manager's Report would be considered in conjunction with Land Use Application No. 19.

B. ITEMS REFERRED BY COUNCIL

There were no items referred by Council.

C. LAND USE APPLICATIONS

WHALLEY

1. Henry Hoolsema

10904/10910 Scott Road

From I-G to I-T

To permit a sales yard for light trucks

January 15, 1991


5690-0341-00

The Director of Planning & Development Services submitted a report on Application 5690-0341-00 for rezoning from I-G to I-T of a two lot site totalling 0.14 hectares (0.35 acres) topermit the sales of light duty trucks.

The Director of Planning & Development Services was recommending that this application notbe approved.

It was Moved by Alderman Fomich

Seconded by Alderman HigginbothamThat Application 5690-0341-00 for rezoning from "General Industrial Zone (I-G)" to "TransportationIndustrial Zone (I-T)" of a two lot site totalling 0.14 hectares (0.35 acres) to permit the sales of lightduty trucks be denied.

RES.91-247 Carried

2. Mr. & Mrs. Peat

12322 Winram Road

From I-G to C-H

To give conformity to an existing used car and truck

sales operation.

5690-0076-00

The Director of Planning and Development Services submitted a report on Application 5690-0076-00 for rezoning from I-G to C-H of a 0.20-hectare (0.50-acre) property located at 12322Winram Road in South Westminster, to give conformity to an existing used car and truck salesoperation on the property.

The Director of Planning and Development Services was recommending that Council notapprove this application.

Mr. Peat was in attendance and discussed his application with the Council members. Mr. Peatrequested that he be permitted to continue to operate an existing car and truck sales operation. Mr. Peat stated that the Ministry of Transportation and Highways have advised that he will beable to access Scott Road, with some minor construction. He further advised that flooding willnot be a problem, as funds have been allocated by the Provincial Government for a pumpingstation.


Seconded by Alderman VilleneuveThat Application 5690-0076-00 for rezoning from "General Industrial Zone (I-G)" to "HighwayCommercial Zone (C-H)" of a 0.20-hectare (0.50-acre) property at 12322 Winram Road be tabled andreferred back to the Planning Department to find a temporary solution to allow the business to continueto operate.

January 15, 1991


RES.91-248 Carried

In response to a question from Council, the South Westminster Report is to be distributed to theCouncil members.

3. Cherington Intercare Inc.

Patrick Consultants Ltd.

13453 - 111A Avenue

From P-P to P-P(2)

To permit the expansion of the existing care facility

5690-0261-00

The Director of Planning and Development Services submitted a report on Application 5690-0261-00 for rezoning from P-P to P-P(2) to permit expansion of the existing care facility.

The Director of Planning and Development Services was recommending that:

1. This application proceed to Stage II; and

2. The design objectives outlined in Appendix "I" be adopted by Council to guide theapplicant in Stage II process.

It was Moved by Alderman Watkins

Seconded by Alderman HuntThat:

1. This application proceed to Stage II; and

2. The design objectives outlined in Appendix "I" be adopted by Council to guide theapplicant in Stage II process, namely:

Planning/Urban Design

(1) To be sensitive to the scale of the neighboring residences and their need for privacy.

(2) To design outdoor areas that are easily accessible to the care home residents, secured,barrier-free, attractively landscaped, have access to sun and daylight, cater to the passive andactive outdoor recreation needs of the residents and are connected visually with indoor spaces.

(3) To upgrade existing landscaping and provide street-side trees so as to create an attractivestreet interface.

(4) To upgrade appearance of the existing building and design the addition to architecturally

January 15, 1991


and functionally coordinate with the existing building.

(5) To design the addition and review the existing building design with a view to create abuilding that is safe, secure, barrier-free, livable and comfortable enough to meet at least theminimum building and health regulations.

(6) To resolve the adjoining lane dead-end by the provision of a turn-around or access to thestreet.

Engineering

(1) To acquire widening to 27 metres along 112 Avenue.

(2) To restrict driveway entrances to a maximum 9 metres and upgrade the existing parkingand loading areas so as to make them safe and easily maneuverable (see Appendix "II").

(3) To address the inadequacy of the existing water main so as to ensure fire flows for fireprotection.

RES.91-249 Carried

4. Poon, Shin L.

10533 - 10539 King George Highway

From C-H to C-R(1)

To rezone an existing building to permit a wider range of uses.

5690-0380-00

The Director of Planning & Development Services advised that the applicants requested that thismatter be tabled.


Seconded by Alderman HuntThat Application 5690-0380-00 for rezoning from "Highway Commercial Zone (C-H)" to "RetailCommercial Zone One (C-R(1))" be tabled for a delegation.

RES.91-250 Carried

5. Hui L. Cheong

Raymond Y. Ching Architect & Associates

9376 and 9392 King George Highway

From RS and R-F(R) to C-D of the front portion of the site.

To permit the expansion and continuing operation of the

January 15, 1991


existing plant nursery.

5690-0177-00

The Director of Planning and Development Services submitted a report on Application 5690-0177-00 for rezoning from RS and R-F(R) to C-D of the front portion of the site at 9376 and9392 King George Highway, to permit the expansion and continuing operation of the existingplant nursery.

The Director of Planning and Development Services was recommending that Council:

1. Approve this application to proceed to Stage II for a rezoning from RS and R-F(R) to C-D, to becrafted from C-H and R-F(R) to permit a plant nursery with a greenhouse as an accessory use, and aresidence only;

2. Approve the design objectives as set out in Appendix I to guide the design process in Stage II; and

3. Require the applicant to apply for a consolidation/subdivision of the two properties along the zoneboundary.

It was Moved by Alderman Schrenk

Seconded by Alderman WatkinsThat Council:

1. Approve this application to proceed to Stage II for a rezoning from "Suburban Residential Zone(RS)" and "Restricted Single Family Residential Zone (R-F(R))" to "Comprehensive Development Zone(C-D)", to be crafted from "Highway Commercial Zone (C-H)" and "Restricted Single FamilyResidential Zone (R-F(R))" to permit a plant nursery with a greenhouse as an accessory use, and aresidence only;

2. Approve the design objectives as set out in Appendix I to guide the design process in Stage II,namely,

Planning

(1) To provide for a substantial physical vertical buffer, e.g. landscaping that includes treesand screening, to the existing and future residential area to the south.

(2) To create a visually attractive interface, both on ground and at building facade to the north,so as to be cognizant of the overview of the site from the existing building.

(3) To present a visually attractive interface and building, and architecturally coordinatedsignage to King George Highway.

(4) To create parking area that is landscaped, visually attractive, easily accessible, withdistinct pedestrian pathways.

(5) To address livability of the residence by providing a safe, secured, and attractive private

January 15, 1991


space around it.

(6) To provide security lighting and fencing around and within the site as required.

(7) To locate loading, garbage collection and outdoor storage areas away from the adjoiningproperties and screen them adequately so as to restrict their overview.

(8) To construct exteriors of the buildings with finishes and materials that would createattractive buildings.

(9) To provide accessible, distinct, and maneuverable areas for loading and garbage collectionaway from King George Highway and privacy area of the residence.

(10) To provide an accurate and detailed contour map of the entire site so as to establish arational consolidation and subdivision plan to the satisfaction of the Approving Officer, whichcan be used in negotiations by the Municipality to acquire the eastern portion of the site in thefuture if so desired.

Engineering

(1) To provide adequate fire flows to the site.

(2) To secure an adequate right-of-way and easement for the future sewer trunk to the east.

(3) To locate driveways to the site so that they are clear of street lights, hydrants, or powerpoles by 3 metres as well as being 3 metres from the property lines.

(4) To provide right-in/right-out access only from King George Highway; and

3. Require the applicant to apply for a consolidation/subdivision of the two properties along the zoneboundary.

RES.91-251 Carried

6. Anna L. Yorston

10043 - 161 Street

From A-1 to R-1

To permit development of two net half-acre lots.

5690-0010-00

The Director of Planning & Development Services submitted a report on Application 5690-0010-00 for rezoning from A-1 to R-1 of property located at 10043 - 161 Street, to permitdevelopment of two net half-acre lots fronting 161 Street. The watercourse will be dedicated asopen space.

January 15, 1991


The Director of Planning and Development Services was recommending that Council:

1. Instruct staff to prepare a Rezoning By-law to rezone a portion of the property east of the ravinefrom A-1 to R-1 for Council consideration and necessary readings.

2. Instruct staff to prepare a Development Variance Permit to vary the maximum road length for acul-de-sac road (161 Street from 102 Avenue to site) from 220m to 345m.

3. Instruct staff to resolve the following issues prior to Public Hearing and/or Final Reading:

(a) Ensure access, utilities and services are provided to the satisfaction of the MunicipalEngineer;

(b) Ensure that the subdivision layout is prepared in accordance with the Design Objectivesoutlined in Appendix II.

(c) Obtain input and approval from Federal/Provincial Fisheries.

4. Pass a resolution to amend the Fleetwood Local Area Plan from Suburban One Acre to SuburbanHalf-Acre.


Seconded by Alderman HuntThat Council:

1. Instruct staff to prepare a Rezoning By-law to rezone a portion of the property east of the ravinefrom "Agricultural Zone One (A-1)" to "Residential Zone One (R-1)" for Council consideration andnecessary readings.

2. Instruct staff to prepare a Development Variance Permit to vary the maximum road length for acul-de-sac road (161 Street from 102 Avenue to site) from 220m to 345m.


(a) Ensure access, utilities and services are provided to the satisfaction of the MunicipalEngineer;

(b) Ensure that the subdivision layout is prepared in accordance with the Design Objectivesoutlined in Appendix II, namely:

Planning Objectives

(1) The significant ravine to be identified by field survey with the top of bank botheast and west of the ravine being flagged.

(2) All proposed lot lines to be set back at least 5m upstream from the surveyed top ofbank.

January 15, 1991


(3) All significant stands of trees to be identified and a statement regarding theirpreservation backed up by restrictive covenants where justified to be submitted by theapplicant.

(4) Siting plans for all new homes to be submitted and be sensitive to the topographyand vegetation of the site.

Engineering Objectives

(1) Provision to be made for the widening of 160 Street to 27m.

(2) Water main to supply adequate flow for fire protection is to be extended along 161Street.

(3) 161 Street is to be upgraded to acceptable standards, and if it is to be cul-de-saced,an adequate turnaround is to be constructed at the south end and a DVP is to beapproved to relax its length.

(4) Steps to be taken to close a section of 100 Avenue if this is considered necessary atthis time.

(5) The boundary of the major intercourse through the site is to be identified asindicated above and appropriately preserved.

(6) Other items in the Engineering Comments to be addressed where applicable.

(c) Obtain input and approval from Federal/Provincial Fisheries.

4. Pass a resolution to amend the Fleetwood Local Area Plan from Suburban One Acre to SuburbanHalf-Acre.

RES.91-252 Carried

7. Devonshire Cottage Ltd./Tom Hassell

8131 - 160 Street

From RS to RT-1

To permit a townhouse development.

5690-0056-00

The Director of Planning & Development Services submitted a report on Application 5690-0056-00 for rezoning from RS to RT-1 for property located at 8131 - 160 Street, to permit theconstruction of 26 townhouses at a density of 31 units per hectare (12 units per acre).

The Director of Planning and Development Services was recommending that Council deny this

January 15, 1991


application.

Mr. Hassell, part owner of the subject property, was in attendance to comment on thisapplication to permit a townhouse development. Mr. Hassell advised that they were unable toacquire additional property to meet the site requirements of the by-law. Mr. Hassell noted thatCouncil can approve a variance permit to allow the project to proceed. Mr. Hassell pointed outthat a design was not submitted for the project, and questioned the design comments in theplanning report. Mr. Hassell added that if the project is approved, they are willing to address thedesign concerns of the Planning Department.


Seconded by Alderman SchrenkThat Application 5690-0056-00 for rezoning from "Suburban Residential Zone (RS)" to "TownhouseResidential Zone (RT-1)" be denied.

RES.91-253 Carried with Aldermen Higginbotham, Watkins and Hunt against.

8. 2681323 Enterprises Ltd.

15962 - 82 Avenue

From RS to RT-1

To develop a 64-unit townhouse complex

5689-0534-00

The Director of Planning & Development Services submitted a report on Application 5689-0534-00 for rezoning from RS to RT-1 to permit a 64-unit townhouse complex.

The Director of Planning & Development services was recommending that Council:

1. Instruct staff to prepare a Rezoning By-law to rezone the property from RS to RT-1 for Councilconsideration and necessary readings, subject to registration of a restrictive covenant to prevent theissuance of building permits prior to April 1, 1991.

2. Authorize staff to draft a Development Permit.

3. Approve the Design Objectives, set out in Appendix III.

Mr. Cheng, Architect, was in attendance on behalf of the applicant to comment on thisapplication for rezoning from RS to RT-1.

In response to a question, Mr. Cheng advised that the applicant wishes to proceed withconstructing the project; however, due to economic conditions, the applicant is consideringconstructing in phases, rather than constructing 64-units in one phase.

In response to a further question, Mr. Cheng advised that acquiring additional properties toconsolidate with this project was not considered as the project was already being worked on.

January 15, 1991


The motion tabled at the December 18, 1990, meeting was considered as follows:


Seconded by Alderman HigginbothamThat Council:

1. Instruct staff to prepare a Rezoning By-law to rezone the property from RS to RT-1 for Councilconsideration and necessary readings, subject to registration of a restrictive covenant to prevent theissuance of building permits prior to April 1, 1991.

2. Authorize staff to draft a Development Permit.

3. Approve the Design Objectives, set out in Appendix III, namely:

Planning:

(1) Create a large, varied articulated outdoor space both as a visual and functional amenity.

(2) Provide for safe, secured, easily accessible and "defensible" recreation areas for childrenand adults; create well-lit and easily supervised public areas and internal streets.

(3) Design the street-facing units and landscaping so as to create pedestrian interest, facilitatepedestrian access off the street, and integrate landscaping with the street boulevard.

(4) Avoid a monotonous facade and repetitive designs, design units that respond to theirlocation on the site.

(5) Provide for identifiable and safe pedestrian access to the development from the street, anda pathway system within the development that is safe and identifiable.

(6) Provide for street-side shade trees along the public streets.

(7) Provide for garbage collection areas that are easily accessible, away from privacy areas ofunits, screened and secured from vandalism.

Engineering:

(1) Provide for a safe, identifiable pedestrian link to the recreation building from 82 Avenue.

(2) Provide good visual access to and from the site entrance driveway for vehicles, e.g., avoidtall vegetation, high fences, posts, utility poles, hydrants close to the driveway.(3) Provide for road rights-of-way which are adequate to accommodate all utilities andservices.

(4) Provide for adequate fire protection.

January 15, 1991


to guide the design process in Phase 2.

RES.91-254 Carried with Aldermen Schrenk, Villeneuve and the Acting Mayor against.

FRASER HEIGHTS (STAGE I)

9. Sheraton Intercontinental (John Rusin)

Ken Stinson

10042, 10010, 9974 - 176 Street,

17711, 17725 Barnston Drive, and

9959 Lycean Drive

From RS to C-T(1) and C-G(1)

To permit a 100-unit motel, a recreation vehicle site

for about 80 vehicles, a self-service gas station &

associated uses, and a restaurant.

5690-0284-00

The Director of Planning & Development Services submitted a report on Application 5690-0284-00 for rezoning from RS to C-T(1) and C-G(1) of property at 10042, 10010, 9974 - 176Street, 1711, 17725 Barnston Drive, and 9959 Lycean Drive, to permit a 100-unit motel, arecreation vehicle site for about 80 vehicles, a self-service gas station & associated uses, and arestaurant.

The Director of Planning & Development Services was recommending that:

1. Council approve this application proceeding to Stage II;

2. That detailed design be guided by the design objectives set out in Appendix A.

Mr. Stinson, and principles of Sheraton Intercontinental were in attendance to discussapplication 5690-0284-00 with the Council members. Mr. Stinson pointed out that this proposalis compatible with the surrounding area. He noted that this site is not suitable for residentialdevelopment. Mr. Stinson commented on the road pattern for the project.

In response to a question, Mr. Stinson advised that he did not feel that the traffic generated fromthis project would not adversely impact on the area. He advised that the community is moreconcerned with truck traffic and traffic on Harvie Road. Mr. Stinson discussed the feasibility ofa RV component versus a permanent mobile home park.

Mr. Stinson advised that they have a letter from the Ministry of Transportation & Highwaysindicating that the road pattern is acceptable to the Ministry.

Alderman Watkins left the meeting at 7:18 p.m.

January 15, 1991


In responding to further questions, the delegation advised that they are looking at a separaterestaurant on site. Meeting rooms would probably be accommodated in the motel component.

The delegation advised that with the new planned intersection, pedestrian safety would beimproved. The delegation further advised that they would be willing to provide a crosswalk forchildren to access the school, if required.

Alderman Schrenk indicated that it was her understanding that a new school would beconstructed north of the freeway to address the problem of children having to cross a busy streetto access Anniedale School. Alderman Schrenk requested that the School Board representativesadvise Council on the schools in this area.

Alderman Watkins returned to the meeting at 7:24 p.m.



1. Council approve this application proceeding to Stage II for rezoning from RS to C-T(1) and C-G(2);

2. That detailed design be guided by the design objectives set out in Appendix A, namely:

(1) Maximize tree retention in the recreation vehicle area to present the most rural atmosphereto the adjacent areas.

(2) The motel should have a "residential" design at the north end.

(3) Adequate recreation and amenity areas should be provided.

(4) The view from the highway should prevent a high quality impression in a rural/greencontext.

(5) The development facing 176 Street should be compatible with present and futureresidential development to the west.

(6) The internal layout of the site should ensure safe and convenient circulation patterns forboth pedestrian and vehicles.

(7) Parking areas should be landscaped to avoid the feel of large expanses of asphalt andmaintain a rural feel.


FRASER HEIGHTS (STAGE II)

January 15, 1991


10. S. & I. Berghall

Steve Mehes

15737 - 108 Avenue

From RS to R-F(R)

To permit subdivision into approximately ten lots.

5690-0302-00

The Director of Planning & Development Services submitted a report on Application 5690-0302-00 for rezoning from RS to R-F(R) of a .93 hectare (2.3 acre) property located at 15737 -108 Avenue in the Fraser Heights area to permit subdivision into approximately 10 single familylots.

The Director of Planning & Development Services was recommending that Council:

1. Instruct staff to prepare a Rezoning By-law to rezone the property from RS to R-F(R) for Councilconsideration and necessary readings.


a. Ensure access, utilities and services are provided to the satisfaction of the MunicipalEngineer;

b. Ensure that the layout and design are acceptable to the Approving Officer.



1. Instruct staff to prepare a Rezoning By-law to rezone the property from "Suburban ResidentialZone (RS)" to "Restricted Single Family Residential Zone (R-F(R))" for Council consideration andnecessary readings.


a. Ensure access, utilities and services are provided to the satisfaction of the MunicipalEngineer;

b. Ensure that the layout and design are acceptable to the Approving Officer.

RES.91-256 Carried

PORT KELLS (STAGE II)

11. T.H. Kleysen

January 15, 1991


Hub Engineering & Development Co.

9672 & 9682 - 190 Street and

9693 - 192 Street

From I-G to I-T

To permit the operation of a transport business.

5690-0381-00

The Director of Planning & Development Services submitted a report on Application 5690-0381-00 for rezoning from I-G to I-T of a three-lot site with a total of 3.48 hectare (8.6 acres)located at 9672 and 9682 - 190 Street and 9693 - 192 Street in Port Kells to permit operation ofa transport business.


1. Instruct staff to prepare a rezoning by-law to rezone the property from I-G to I-T for Councilconsideration and necessary readings.

2. Instruct staff to obtain input and approval from:

a. Ministry of Transportation and Highways;

b. Provincial/Federal Fisheries; and

c. Ministry of Environment.


a. Ensure access, utilities and services can be provided to the satisfaction of the MunicipalEngineer;

b. Ensure that the site layout is acceptable to the Approving Officer;

c. Registration of a Restrictive Covenant for the provision and maintenance of landscaping asper an approved plan.

Alderman Hunt questioned the status of amendments to the zoning by-law, and how theamendments will impact on applications that Council are approving in the interim.


Seconded by Alderman WatkinsThat Council:

1. Instruct staff to prepare a rezoning by-law to rezone the property from "General Industrial Zone (I-

January 15, 1991


G)" to "Transportation Industrial Zone (I-T)" for Council consideration and necessary readings.

2. Instruct staff to obtain input and approval from:

a. Ministry of Transportation and Highways;

b. Provincial/Federal Fisheries; and

c. Ministry of Environment.


a. Ensure access, utilities and services can be provided to the satisfaction of the MunicipalEngineer;

b. Ensure that the site layout is acceptable to the Approving Officer;

c. Registration of a Restrictive Covenant for the provision and maintenance of landscaping asper an approved plan.

RES.91-257 Carried

NORTH NEWTON

12. Bignell, Kang and Badhan

12468 - 82 Avenue

From RS to I-G

To allow for the construction of a warehouse.

5689-0503-00

The Director of Planning & Development Services submitted a report on Application 5689-0503-00 for rezoning from RS to I-G of a 0.831 ha (2.09 acre) property located at 12468 - 82Avenue in Newton to permit the construction of a 3,600m2 warehouse building.

The Director of Planning and Development Services was recommending:

1. That this application to rezone to I-G proceed to Stage II process.

2. That the following engineering and design objectives be adopted for consideration in Stage IIprocess:

(a) Both site planning and building design should be coordinated with the project to the east,and the design concerns stated in Appendix II should be addressed.

January 15, 1991


(b) Parking lot areas should be coordinated with those to the east.

(c) The building should be set back in recognition of the setback of the building to the west.

(d) A continuous landscaped area should be provided in front of the building.

(e) Ensure that the driveway is satisfactorily provided and constructed to the specifications setforth in Appendix I.


Seconded by Alderman Villeneuve1. That this application to rezone to "General Industrial Zone (I-G)" proceed to Stage II process.

2. That the following engineering and design objectives be adopted for consideration in Stage IIprocess:

(a) Both site planning and building design should be coordinated with the project to the east,and the design concerns stated in Appendix II should be addressed.

(b) Parking lot areas should be coordinated with those to the east.

(c) The building should be set back in recognition of the setback of the building to the west.

(d) A continuous landscaped area should be provided in front of the building.

(e) Ensure that the driveway is satisfactorily provided and constructed to the specifications setforth in Appendix I, namely:

loading must occur with vehicle parking parallel to building;

eliminate stall No. 1 and delineate end of parking with a raised curb;

driveway magazine storage to project 10.0 metres into the site from property line. Therefore, stall Nos. 60 and 61 must be eliminated and the east side of the drivewaydelineated with a curb;

driveway cross-sections are required. A maximum elevation difference of 0.3 metre isallowed between centreline of road and property line;

driveways to be clear of hydrants, power poles and street lights by 3.0 metres;

landscaping at driveways is not to exceed 0.5 metre height at maturity within 6.0metres along property line; and

the Municipality is interested in constructing sidewalk on the south side of 82 Avenueunder development coordinated works provided funds are available.

January 15, 1991


RES.91-258 Carried

13. Robertson, Kolbeins, Teevan and

Gallaher, Consulting Engineers

12684 - 82 Avenue

To amend Land Use Contract No. 336

in order to accommodate a new 100' cellular

communications tower & equipment building.

5590-0332-00

The Director of Planning & Development Services submitted a report on Application 5590-0332-00 for an amendment to Land Use Contract No. 336 for property at 12684 - 82 Avenue inNewton to permit the construction of a 100' cellular communications tower and equipmentbuilding.

The Director of Planning & Development Services was recommending:

1. That this application for amending LUC No. 336 proceed to the Stage II process.

2. That the engineering and design objectives set out in the report be adopted for consideration in theStage II process.


Seconded by Alderman Hunt1. That this application for amending LUC No. 336 proceed to the Stage II process.

2. That the engineering and design objectives set out in the report be adopted for considerationin the Stage II process, namely:


The proposed access way for the tower and equipment building must be paved and a 70foot tarmac, 15 feet wide with turnaround of 30 feet radius for ease of circulation, issuggested.

Design Objectives

Resolution of how cellular communications tower and equipment building will beincorporated into the design of the Phase II building, and provision of landscapescreening surrounding the tower and equipment building.

RES.91-259 Carried

January 15, 1991


14. Gus Elgert/E1 Cada Construction Ltd.

13106 - 80 Avenue

From RS to I-G

To construct a multi-tenant warehouse building

5690-0386-00

The Director of Planning & Development Services submitted a report on Application 5690-0386-00 for rezoning from RS to I-G of a .40 hectare (1.00 acre) property located at 13106 - 80Avenue in the Newton area to permit the construction of a multi-tenant warehouse building.


1. That this application to rezone from RS to I-G proceed to Stage II process.

2. That the engineering and design objectives, as set out in this report, be adopted for consideration inthe Stage II process.


Seconded by Alderman Fomich1. That this application to rezone from "Suburban Residential Zone (RS)" to "GeneralIndustrial Zone (I-G)" proceed to Stage II process.

2. That the engineering and design objectives, as set out in this report, be adopted forconsideration in the Stage II process.

RES.91-260 Carried

15. Maximillian Mueller

7825 King George Highway

From C-H and I-S to C-R(1)

To allow for a lawyer's office

5690-0288-00

The Director of Planning & Development Services submitted a report for rezoning from C-Hand I-S to C-R(1) of property at 7515 King George Highway to allow the second storey of thebuilding to be used for lawyers' offices.

The Director of Planning & Development Services was recommending that this application bedenied.

Mr. Mueller was in attendance to comment on his application for rezoning from C-H and I-S toC-R(1) to permit a lawyer's office. Mr. Mueller advised that a law firm is occupying this spaceat the present time. Mr. Mueller pointed out that the law firm has spent approximately $70,000

January 15, 1991


renovating the space they have leased. Mr. Mueller further advised that Van City Savings hasindicated interest in the property should the zoning be favourable. Mr. Mueller noted otherbusinesses along King George Highway which are currently zoned C-R(1).


Seconded by Alderman HuntThat Application 5690-0288-00 for rezoning from "Highway Commercial Zone (C-H)" and "ServiceIndustrial Zone (I-S)" to "Retail Commercial Zone One (C-R(1))" be denied.

RES.91-261 Carried with Aldermen Schrenk and Watkins against.

SOUTH NEWTON

16. Guru Nanak Sikh Temple,

District of Surrey

Guru Nanak Sikh Temple

7050 - 120 Street

From LUC496 (P-A) and RS to C-D to permit

construction of additions to the Sikh Temple,

a retail building, a senior citizens'

community centre, and a private school on

the temple property and playing fields

on the Municipal property.

5690-0342-00

The Director of Planning & Development Services submitted a report on Application 5690-0342-00 for rezoning from LUC 496 (P-A) and RS to C-D to permit construction of additions tothe Sikh Temple, a retail building, a senior citizens' community centre, and a private school onthe temple property and playing fields on the Municipal property at 7050 - 120 Street.


1. This application proceed to Stage II process for a Comprehensive Development Zone.

2. The engineering and design objectives set out in Appendix V be adopted for consideration in StageII.

A delegation was in attendance and advised that the retail building is on the Sikh property. Theseniors community building and private school are on the Sikh property as well. The playingfields are on municipal property. The whole complex is designed for the enjoyment of the Indo-Canadian community and all the residents of Surrey.

January 15, 1991


In responding to a question, the delegation advised that the temple addition will be constructedin the first phase, with the seniors centre to follow, and the retail component, school and gym tofollow in the final phases.



1. This application proceed to Stage II process for a Comprehensive Development Zone.

2. The engineering and design objectives set out in Appendix V be adopted for consideration in StageII, namely:

(1) To ensure the proposed commercial development and adjacent existing and proposedcommercial properties along Scott Road are well co-ordinated in terms of pedestrian orientation,building character, site layout, parking, and vehicular access.

(2) To ensure the retail component of the development has a low profile so as not to competewith the temple in prominence.

(3) To ensure adequate parking is provided to meet the parking needs of various uses proposedin the application, and to ensure adequate landscaping is provided to mitigate the impact of alarge parking lot.

(4) To ensure parking for the commercial retail component is physically separated from thenon-commercial parking.

(5) To ensure parking for the playing fields is directly accessible to both Kabaddi and soccerfields.

(6) To ensue cross-aisles are provided at both ends in deep parking aisles to improveaccessibility to the parking stalls.

(7) To ensure all fencing requirements are identified and designs are sensitive to thearchitectural expression of the temple.

(8) To provide alternative access driveways to facilitate efficient dispersal of traffic whilerespecting the integrity of adjacent residential uses.

(9) To ensure fire access lanes are provided to the satisfaction of the Fire Chief.

(10) To develop a comprehensive sign design plan for the overall development.

(11) To locate and preserve the mature stands of trees and to incorporate them into the overalllandscaping plan.

(12) To ensure proper landscaping is provided throughout the entire site, including area where

January 15, 1991


future phase of the development is planned.

(13) To ensure the development plan considers the site planning guidelines contained in theEngineering Comments. (Appendix II).

(14) To ensure the configuration of playing fields and facilities on the Municipal site is to thesatisfaction of Parks and Recreation Department.

(15) To ensure the design and construction of the school buildings meeting school standards.

Before the motion was put:


Seconded by Alderman HuntThat Application 5690-0342-00 be tabled to Special Council for discussion.

RES.91-262 Carried with Aldermen Fomich and Watkins against.

SOUTH NEWTON (STAGE II)

17. Hardev S. Grewal

Peter Chancey

6856 - 124 Street

From RS to R-F(R)

To subdivide into two single family lots.

5690-0374-00

The Director of Planning & Development Services submitted a report on Application 5690-0374-00 for rezoning from RS to R-F(R) of a 2143m2 (23,076 ft2) property at 6856 - 124 Streetto permit subdivision into two single family lots.


1. Introduce the attached Rezoning By-law to rezone the subject property from RS to R-F(R) (SeeAppendix A).


(a) Ensure satisfactory provision of access, utilities and services; and

(b) That the subdivision layout be revised as shown in the attached drawing, includingrelocation of the existing house to conform to setback requirements (See Appendix B).

January 15, 1991




1. Introduce a rezoning by-law to rezone the subject property from "Suburban Residential Zone (RS)"to "Restricted Single Family Residential Zone (R-F(R))."


(a) Ensure satisfactory provision of access, utilities and services; and

(b) That the subdivision layout be revised, as shown on the drawing attached to the report ofthe Director of Planning and Development Services, including relocation of the existing house toconform to the setback requirements.

RES.91-263 Carried

CLOVERDALE

18. Langley Covenant Community Church

19533 - 64 Avenue

From RS to P-A

To develop a church/community facility

and caretaker/staff residence.

5690-0222-00

The Director of Planning & Development Services submitted a report on Application 5690-0222-00 for rezoning from RS to P-A to develop a church/community facility with a duplex forcaretaker/staff at 19533 - 64 Avenue in Cloverdale.


1. This application be referred back to the applicant to establish on-site service capacity and a scaleof development consistent with that capacity.

2. The design objectives set out in Appendix I be endorsed and provided to the applicant so that aresubmission could proceed directly to Stage 2, if appropriate.

Alderman Watins left the meeting at 7:58 p.m.

Mr. Brian Watson, Pastor, was in attendance to comment on their application for rezoning fromRS to P-A to permit the development of a church/community facility and duplex toaccommodate caretaker/staff residence.

January 15, 1991


In response to a question of a church and one residence versus a church and two residences, thePastor advised making an adjustment to one residence would not cause a problem.

Pastor Watson advised that there is one facility planned that will have multiple uses.

Alderman Watkins returned to the meeting at 8:13 p.m.

It was Moved by Alderman Villeneuve

Seconded by Alderman SchrenkThat:

1. This application be tabled and referred back to the applicant to establish on-site service capacityand a scale of development consistent with that capacity.

2. The design objectives set out in Appendix I be endorsed and provided to the applicant so that aresubmission could proceed directly to Stage 2, if appropriate, namely:

ENGINEERING OBJECTIVES

(1) Single access onto 64 Avenue;

(2) Driveway should project 15.1m into the site without aisles or parking spaces accessing itfrom the property line;

(3) Driveway should be located a minimum of 3.0m from neighbouring property lines;

(4) Separated pedestrian walkway connecting 64 avenue with the front door of the mainbuilding;

(5) Avoid stalls on dead end aisles where possible. Where stalls are on dead end aisles, theend stalls should be 0.6m wider than the typical stall;

(6) Require detailed scaled plan; dimension and number parking stalls for reference;

(7) No trees or bushes to exceed 0.5m in height at maturity when located within 6.0m of thedriveway on the property line;

(8) Driveway cross-section drawings will be required; difference in elevation should notexceed 0.3m between the centre line of the road and the driveway at the property line; and

(9) Show power poles, hydrants, street lights, etc. They should not be within 3.0m of thedriveway.

The Engineering Department will reserve final comments pending a submission of reviseddrawings.

January 15, 1991


DESIGN OBJECTIVES

(1) Building design to reflect institutional identity and to develop local themes (if any);

(2) Landscaping to be sensitive to future adjacent developments and existing single familysubdivision to the south;

(3) Building massing should respect the adjacent land uses;

(4) Site layout to provide future pedestrian access around the site and to lands beyond; and

(5) Residential building to be located north of the institutional facility.

RES.91-264 Carried with Alderman Hunt against.

19. B & B Contracting Ltd.

Coastland Engineering & Surveying Ltd.

17223 & 17295 - 56 Avenue

From A-3 to I-G and RT-1

To permit a contractor's storage yard and

a 40-unit townhouse complex.

5689-0306-00

The Municipal Manager submitted a report which indicated the conflicting recommendations ofthe Director of Planning & Development Services and the Director of Business & CommunityRelations with respect to this application. He advised that while it is desirable to retainindustrial lands, the Planner's position is supported in this instance.

The Director of Planning & Development Services submitted a report on Application 5689-0306-00 for rezoning from A-3 to RT-1 and I-G of a two-lot site with a total of 4.05 hectares(10 acres) located at 17223/17295 - 56 Avenue in Cloverdale to permit a contractor's storageyard and a 40-unit townhouse complex.


1. Instruct staff to prepare the following by-laws for Council consideration and necessary readings:

(a) A rezoning by-law to rezone the properties from A-3 to RT-1 and I-G;

(b) An OCP amendment by-law to re-designate the north 3.9 acres of the site from Industrialto Urban;

(c) An OCP amendment by-law to include the north 3.9 acres in a mandatory developmentpermit area;

January 15, 1991


2. Authorize staff to obtain input and approval from Ministry of Transportation and Highways; and


(a) Ensure access, utilities and services are satisfactorily provided for;

(b) Ensure that the layout, design, and landscape works are acceptable to the Municipality;

(c) Registration of a Restrictive Covenant on the industrial component to prohibit anydevelopment until adequate fire flows are available at the site, and to provide for themaintenance of landscaping on the site; and

(d) Registration of a restrictive covenant on the residential component to alert owners and/ortenants that they are next to an industrial property.

Mr. Kelly Bickerton of B & B Contracting was in attendance and advised that construction willstart this year on the townhouse component.

Mr. Bickerton, in responding to a question, advised that only one entrance has been provided toaddress the concerns of the residents with respect to increased traffic.


Seconded by Alderman HigginbothamThat Council:

1. Instruct staff to prepare the following by-laws for Council consideration and necessary readings:

(a) A rezoning by-law to rezone the properties from "Agricultural Zone Three (A-3)" to"Townhouse Residential Zone (RT-1)" and "General Industrial Zone (I-G)";

(b) An OCP amendment by-law to re-designate the north 3.9 acres of the site from Industrialto Urban;

(c) An OCP amendment by-law to include the north 3.9 acres in a mandatory developmentpermit area;

2. Authorize staff to obtain input and approval from Ministry of Transportation and Highways; and


(a) Ensure access, utilities and services are satisfactorily provided for;

(b) Ensure that the layout, design, and landscape works are acceptable to the Municipality;

(c) Registration of a Restrictive Covenant on the industrial component to prohibit any

January 15, 1991


development until adequate fire flows are available at the site, and to provide for themaintenance of landscaping on the site; and

(d) Registration of a restrictive covenant on the residential component to alert owners and/ortenants that they are next to an industrial property.

RES.91-265 Carried with the Acting Mayor against.

20. District of Surrey

17445 - 57 Avenue

From R-F to RM-2

To develop an 8-unit/2-storey apartment building.

5690-0338-00 and 6790-0338-00

The Director of Planning & Development Services submitted a report on Applications 5690-0338-00 and 6790-0338-00 for rezoning from R-F to RM-2, and issuance of a DevelopmentPermit.


1. This application proceed to Stage II process.

2. The following engineering and design objectives be adopted for consideration in Stage II processas set out in Appendix I.




2. The following engineering and design objectives be adopted for consideration in Stage II processas set out in Appendix I, namely:

ENGINEERING OBJECTIVES

(1) Comply with parking regulations; and

(2) Reassess existing location of garbage container.

DESIGN OBJECTIVES

(1) Building design and layout should be sensitive to single-family lots along 174 Street;

January 15, 1991


(2) Building design should be consistent in colour and architecture as Phase I;

(3) Interface development with existing drainage canal, i.e.,. landscaping and safety; and

(4) Recreational space (indoor/outdoor) to be clearly accessible to both existing and proposed units.

RES.91-266 Carried

DOUGLAS

21. Peace Portal Properties Ltd.

17063 - 4 Avenue

From A-1 to P-R

To construct a Par 3 golf course and

1,000 sq.ft. clubhouse.

5690-0325-00

The Director of Planning & Development Services submitted a report on Application 5690-0325-00 for rezoning from A-1 to P-R of a 5.95 hectare (14.70 acre) site located at 17063 - 4Avenue adjacent to the Peace Portal Golf Course in the Douglas Planning Area, to permit theconstruction of a par 3 golf course and clubhouse.



2. The following be included in the Stage II process:

(a) this application be forwarded to the Agricultural Land Commission for their considerationunder Section 20(1) of the Agricultural Land Commission Act;

(b) Completion of an environmental analysis;

(c) Completion of an hydrological study;

(d) Submission of a tree survey.

(e) Engineering Objectives as set out in Appendix II.

Mr. Arnold, Manager, Peace Portal Properties Ltd., was in attendance to respond to questions. Mr. Arnold advised that the golf course has not been sold, but there have been offers and counteroffers and the property could be sold.


January 15, 1991


Seconded by Alderman HigginbothamThat


2. The following be included in the Stage II process:

(a) this application be forwarded to the Agricultural Land Commission for their considerationunder Section 20(1) of the Agricultural Land Commission Act;

(b) Completion of an environmental analysis;

(c) Completion of an hydrological study;

(d) Submission of a tree survey.

(e) Engineering Objectives as set out in Appendix II, namely:

(i) Driveway cross-sections must not vary in elevation more than 0.3 metre betweenthe ultimate road centreline and driveway at property line;

(ii) Crossing sight distances: maintain a sight triangle measuring 25 metres along theproperty line from the centreline of the driveway to 3 metres into the site at the drivewaycentreline; no landscaping or obstruction exceeding 0.5 metre height is permitted in thesight triangle.

RES.91-267 Carried

SEMIAHMOO

22. White Rock Fellowship Housing Society

2239 - 152 Street

From P-P(2) to RM-2

To permit a 23-unit, senior-orientated apartment building.

5690-0382-00, 2390-0382-00 & 6790-0382-00

The Director of Planning & Development Services submitted a report on Applications 5690-0382-00, 2390-0382-00 and 6790-0382-00 for rezoning of a 0.83 hectare (2.05 acre) propertylocated at 2239 - 152 Street in the Semiahmoo Planning area to permit a 26-unit seniororientated apartment building, at a density of the RM-2 zone (45 units per acre).


1. That this application proceed to the Stage II process.

January 15, 1991


2. That the engineering and design objectives as set out in this report be adopted for consideration inthe Stage II process.


Seconded by Alderman Fomich1. That this application proceed to the Stage II process.

2. That the following engineering and design objectives be adopted for consideration in the Stage IIprocess, namely:

1. Engineering Objectives

applicant to ensure that the number of parking spaces provided meets the By-lawrequirements; a handicap parking space is to be provided. It is to be 3.6 metres wide and adequatelymarked; at least 50% of parking must be provided underground or within a structure; avoid proposed on-site driveway connection to the neighbouring church site; no modification to be made to existing shared access off 152 Street; and underground parking design required for comment.

2. Design Objectives

amenities should be selected to promote maximum use and the outdoor area should besensitive to the proposed complex south of this site and arranged for maximum sun exposure; avoid the appearance of over developing the site; additional landscaping is required, visitors parking placed in the underground parking garage.; utilize existing shared access off 152 Street; provide adequate building separation between this proposal and those to the west and south.

RES.91-268 Carried

23. International Care Corporation

Waisman Dewar Grout Carter Inc.

15525 - 16 Avenue

From R-F and LUC #318 (C-H) to RM-2

For development of a 47 unit/3 storey

apartment building

5690-0364-00 & 6790-0364-00

The Director of Planning & Development Services submitted a report on Applications 5690-0364-00 and 6790-0364-00 for rezoning from R-F and C-H (LUC #318) to RM-2 fordevelopment of a 47 unit/3 storey apartment building.

January 15, 1991



1. That this application proceed to Stage II process with the subject properties being declared aDevelopment Permit Area and issuance of a Development Permit.

2. That the engineering and design objectives as set out in Appendix I be adopted for consideration inStage II process.

It was Moved by Alderman Higginbotham

Seconded by Alderman Fomich1. That this application proceed to Stage II process with the subject properties being declared aDevelopment Permit Area and issuance of a Development Permit.

2. That the following engineering and design objectives be adopted for consideration in Stage IIprocess as set out in Appendix I, namely:


(a) Driveway layout and geometrics to accommodate for the SU-30 design;

(b) Ramp grades must not exceed 10-12%;

(c) Driveways are to be 3.0 metres from utility poles and hydrants;

(d) Landscaping is not permitted within 6.0m on either side of a driveway along the propertyline which will exceed 0.55m height at maturity.

Design Objectives

(a) Building layout to be sensitive to existing adjacent western development regarding sunexposure and architectural design;

(b) Building mass should minimize impact on single family lots to the north and any futuredevelopment to the east;

(c) Off-street parking should not dominate southern open areas;

(d) Alternative access from 16A Avenue should be considered, especially at the northeasterncorner of site. Any access from 16A Avenue should accommodate single family traffic byproviding adequate site lines.

(e) Consider sharing internal parking lot/access to 16 Avenue via adjacent development to thewest for possible secondary emergency access.

RES.91-269 Carried

January 15, 1991


24. John & Elsie Newton

1834 - 136 Street

From R-H(G) to R-F(R)

To develop two single-family lots

5690-0326-00 & 2390-0326-00

The Director of Planning & Development Services submitted a report on Application 5690-0326-00 and 2390-0326-00 for rezoning from R-H(G) to R-F(R) to develop two single-familylots.

The Director of Planning & Development Services was recommending that this application bedenied.

Mr. Newton was in attendance and advised that he would like to subdivide the property into twosingle family lots. Mr. Newton advised that he did not realize that this property was included inthe Bell Estates subdivision when he sold them a portion of his property. Mr. Newton pointedout that he has owned this property for approximately 45 years.


Seconded by Alderman HuntThat Application 5690-0326-00 and 2390-03126-00 for rezoning from "Half-Acre Residential - GrossDensity Zone (R-H(G))" to "Restricted Single Family Residential Zone (R-F(R))" be denied.

RES.91-270 Carried with Alderman Higginbotham against.


Seconded by Alderman HigginbothamThat the Planning Department review this application and advise the applicant what can be developedon this site.

RES.91-271 Carried

25. Craig Rowland of Bosa Development

368698 B.C. Ltd.

1771 Martin Drive

Amend LUC 371 permitted use from

Commercial to Multiple Residential

5590-0390-00

The Director of Planning & Development Services submitted a report on Application 5590-0390-00 for an amendment to Land Use Contract No. 371 permitted use from Commercial toMultiple Residential.

January 15, 1991


The Director of Planning & Development Services was recommending that

1. This application be approved to proceed to Stage II;

2. That a by-law be introduced to:

(a) amend the schedule of permitted uses for Unit 12 in LUC 371 from Commercial toMultiple Residential, and

(b) amend the development cost charges applicable to Unit 12 from the Impost Fees underLUC 371 to current development cost charges under By-law 10678 where appropriate;

3. That the by-law be processed to Public Hearing and Third Reading stage; and

4. That Final Adoption be withheld pending completion of a Development Agreement.

The Acting Mayor advised that the proponent had requested that the application be tabled forthree weeks.


Seconded by Alderman HigginbothamThat Application 5590-0390-00 be tabled for three weeks.

RES.91-272 Carried

26. Peace Arch Hospital Society

Wayne Lownsbrough

15563/85 - 16 Avenue and

1627/37/47 - 156 Street

Temporary Use Permit

To allow parking for Peace Arch Hospital staff

5690-0255-00

The Director of Planning & Development Services submitted a report on Application 5690-0255-00 for a Temporary Use Permit to permit parking for Peace Arch Hospital staff.

NOTE: Tabled on Dec. 3, 1990 so that the applicant could appear as a delegation to discuss the issue of lotconsolidation.

The Director of Planning & Development Services was recommending that the consolidationrequirement remain in the approval.

January 15, 1991


Mr. Michael Boyle of the Peace Arch Hospital Society, was in attendance and requested that therequirement of property consolidation be deleted. He questioned the appropriateness ofconsolidation at this stage. Consolidation would require long term planning of the site. Thedelegation advised that at this time, they do not know the long term use of this property. Henoted that a secondary issue is that the funds are community generated funds and costs are aconsideration.

It was Moved by Alderman Higginbotham

Seconded by Alderman FomichThat Council:

1. Instruct staff to draft an amendment to the Official Community Plan (1985) to declare theproperties a Temporary Use Permit Area;

2. Authorize staff to resolve the following issues prior to the Temporary Use Permit being given tothe applicant:

(a) submission of a tree survey and landscaping plan to ensure that the temporary parking lotwill be well buffered from all neighbouring properties; and

(b) consolidation of the lots into one building site with provision for road widening asrequired by the Municipal Engineer to encourage a comprehensive development in the nearfuture.

Before the motion was put:-


Seconded by Alderman HigginbothamThat the above motion be amended in Clause (b) by deleting "consolidation of the ..." to "provision"and substituting "provision of a right-of-way".

RES.91-273 Carried with Alderman Fomich, Hunt, and the Acting Mayor against.

The motion, as amended, was then put and:-


27. Sunshine Coast Holdings Ltd.

Canadian Neon Ltd.

1656 Martin Drive

To vary LUC #371

By allowing the installation of a sign.

6990-0369-00

January 15, 1991


This matter was tabled for a delegation at the December 18, 1990, meeting.

The Director of Planning & Development Services submitted a report on Application 6990-0369-00 for a variance of Land Use Contract No. 371 to allow the installation of an illuminatedfacia sign at 1656 Martin Drive in the Semiahmoo Town Centre.

The Director of Planning & Development Services was recommending that Council deny thisapplication.

A representative of Vancouver City Savings Credit Union was in attendance and read the reasonsfor this request. He further advised that the other tenants in the Town Centre had no objectionsto the sign.

A motion by Alderman Fomich to deny the application received no seconder.


Seconded by Alderman SchrenkThat Application 6990-0369-00 for a variance of Land Use Contract No. 371 be approved.

RES.91-275 Carried with Aldermen Villeneuve & Fomich against.

D. OTHER COMPETENT BUSINESS

1. Secondary Suites

The Municipal Manager advised Council that the additional staff required to deal with secondarysuite applications have been recruited and that a further report on this matter will be submittedon Monday, January 21, 1991.

E. ADJOURNMENT


Seconded by Alderman WatkinsThat the Regular Council meeting do now adjourn.

RES.91-276 Carried

The Regular Council meeting adjourned at 8:47 p.m.

CLKMIN 1286

Documents

Tuesday, January 15, 1991 · 2015-06-16 · Tuesday, January 15, 1991 Council Chambers Municipal Hall 14245 - 56 Avenue Surrey, B.C. Tuesday, January 15, 1991 ... Item PR1 Issues