60
No. 13-5272 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT LENEUOTI F. TUAUA, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al. Defendants-Appellees. ______________________________ On Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia ________________________________ JOINT APPENDIX ________________________________ Neil C. Weare Robert J. Katerberg WE THE PEOPLE PROJECT Murad Hussain 1421 T Street N.W., Ste. 10 Elliott C. Mogul Washington, D.C. 20009 Dawn Y. Yamane Hewett (202) 304-1202 Robert A. DeRise ARNOLD & PORTER LLP Charles Ala’ilima 555 Twelfth Street, N.W. LAW OFFICE OF Washington, D.C. 20004-1206 CHARLES V. ALA’ILIMA, PLLC (202) 942-5000 P.O. Box 1118 [email protected] Nu’uuli, AS 96799 (684) 699-6732 Counsel for Plaintiffs-Appellants Leneuoti F. Tuaua; Va’aleama T. Fosi; Fanuatanu F. L. Mamea, on his own behalf and on behalf of his minor children, M.F.N., L.C.M., and E.T.M.; Taffy-Lei T. Maene; Emy F. Afalava; and the Samoan Federation of America, Inc. USCA Case #13-5272 Document #1490172 Filed: 04/25/2014 Page 1 of 60

Tuaua v. United States, DC Circuit Joint Appendix

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Tuaua v. United States is a federal lawsuit brought by Leneuoti Tuaua, the Samoan Federation of America, and others born in American Samoa who believe that so long as American Samoa is a part of the United States, people born in American Samoa have a right to U.S. citizenship under the Constitution. Plaintiffs are represented by Neil Weare, President of We the People Project, a national organization dedicated to achieving equal rights and representation for the nearly 5 million Americans living in U.S. territories and the District of Columbia; Arnold & Porter, LLP, an international law firm; and Charles V. Ala'ilima, a prominent American Samoan attorney.

Citation preview

  • No. 13-5272

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALSDISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

    LENEUOTI F. TUAUA, et al.,Plaintiffs-Appellants,

    v.UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al.

    Defendants-Appellees.

    ______________________________

    On Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia________________________________

    JOINT APPENDIX

    ________________________________

    Neil C. Weare Robert J. KaterbergWE THE PEOPLE PROJECT Murad Hussain1421 T Street N.W., Ste. 10 Elliott C. MogulWashington, D.C. 20009 Dawn Y. Yamane Hewett(202) 304-1202 Robert A. DeRise

    ARNOLD & PORTER LLPCharles Alailima 555 Twelfth Street, N.W.LAW OFFICE OF Washington, D.C. 20004-1206

    CHARLES V. ALAILIMA, PLLC (202) 942-5000P.O. Box 1118 [email protected], AS 96799(684) 699-6732

    Counsel for Plaintiffs-Appellants Leneuoti F. Tuaua; Vaaleama T. Fosi;Fanuatanu F. L. Mamea, on his own behalf and on behalf of his minor children,

    M.F.N., L.C.M., and E.T.M.; Taffy-Lei T. Maene; Emy F. Afalava;and the Samoan Federation of America, Inc.

    USCA Case #13-5272 Document #1490172 Filed: 04/25/2014 Page 1 of 60

  • TABLE OF CONTENTS

    Docket Report, Tuaua, et al. v. United States of America, et al.,No. 1:12-CV-1143-RJL ......................................................................................... 1

    Complaint (July 10, 2012) (ECF No. 1) ................................................................. 8

    Exhibit A to Complaint (July 10, 2012) (ECF No. 1-1)........................................35

    Memorandum Opinion (June 26, 2013) (ECF No. 24) .........................................38

    Order (June 26, 2013) (ECF No. 25)....................................................................55

    Notice of Appeal (August 23, 2013) (ECF No. 26) ..............................................56

    USCA Case #13-5272 Document #1490172 Filed: 04/25/2014 Page 2 of 60

  • APPEAL,CLOSED,TYPELU.S. District Court

    District of Columbia (Washington, DC)CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:12cv01143RJL

    TUAUA et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et alAssigned to: Judge Richard J. LeonCase in other court: 1305272Cause: 28:1331 Fed. Question

    Date Filed: 07/10/2012Date Terminated: 06/26/2013Jury Demand: NoneNature of Suit: 440 Civil Rights: OtherJurisdiction: U.S. Government Defendant

    PlaintiffLENEUOTI FIAFIA TUAUA represented by Murad Hussain

    ARNOLD &PORTER LLP555 12th Street, NWWashington, DC 20004(202) 9426143Fax: (202) 9425999Email: [email protected] ATTORNEYATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

    Robert J. KaterbergARNOLD &PORTER LLP555 12th Street, NWWashington, DC 20004(202) 9425000Email: [email protected] ATTORNEYATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

    Elizabeth Bonnie WydraCONSTITUTIONALACCOUNTABILITY CENTER1200 18th Street, NWWashington, DC 20036(202) 2966889Email: [email protected] TO BE NOTICED

    Judith Ellen SchaefferCONSTITUTIONALACCOUNTABILITY CENTER1200 18th Street, NWSuite 1002Washington, DC 20036(202) 2966889Fax: (202) 2966895Email: [email protected] TO BE NOTICED

    Neil C. Weare1421 T St. NW, Ste. 10Washington, DC 200092025799604Email: [email protected] TO BE NOTICED

    PlaintiffVA'ALEAMA TOVIA FOSI represented by Murad Hussain

    (See above for address)LEAD ATTORNEYATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

    Case: 1:12-cv-01143-RJL As of: 04/23/2014 01:30 PM EDT 1 of 7

    JA01

    USCA Case #13-5272 Document #1490172 Filed: 04/25/2014 Page 3 of 60

  • Robert J. Katerberg(See above for address)LEAD ATTORNEYATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

    Elizabeth Bonnie Wydra(See above for address)ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

    Judith Ellen Schaeffer(See above for address)ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

    Neil C. Weare(See above for address)ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

    PlaintiffFANUATANU FAUESALA LIFAMAMEAon his own behalf and on behalf of hisminor children, M.F.M.,L.C.M., andE.T.M.

    represented by Murad Hussain(See above for address)LEAD ATTORNEYATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

    Robert J. Katerberg(See above for address)LEAD ATTORNEYATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

    Elizabeth Bonnie Wydra(See above for address)ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

    Judith Ellen Schaeffer(See above for address)ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

    Neil C. Weare(See above for address)ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

    PlaintiffTAFFYLEI T. MAENE represented by Murad Hussain

    (See above for address)LEAD ATTORNEYATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

    Robert J. Katerberg(See above for address)LEAD ATTORNEYATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

    Elizabeth Bonnie Wydra(See above for address)ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

    Judith Ellen Schaeffer(See above for address)ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

    Neil C. Weare(See above for address)ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

    Case: 1:12-cv-01143-RJL As of: 04/23/2014 01:30 PM EDT 2 of 7

    JA02

    USCA Case #13-5272 Document #1490172 Filed: 04/25/2014 Page 4 of 60

  • PlaintiffEMY FIATALA AFALAVA represented by Murad Hussain

    (See above for address)LEAD ATTORNEYATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

    Robert J. Katerberg(See above for address)LEAD ATTORNEYATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

    Elizabeth Bonnie Wydra(See above for address)ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

    Judith Ellen Schaeffer(See above for address)ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

    Neil C. Weare(See above for address)ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

    PlaintiffSAMOAN FEDERATION OFAMERICA, INC.

    represented by Murad Hussain(See above for address)LEAD ATTORNEYATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

    Robert J. Katerberg(See above for address)LEAD ATTORNEYATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

    Elizabeth Bonnie Wydra(See above for address)ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

    Judith Ellen Schaeffer(See above for address)ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

    Neil C. Weare(See above for address)ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

    V.DefendantUNITED STATES OF AMERICA represented by Wynne Patrick Kelly

    U.S. Attorney's OfficeCivil Division555 Fourth St., N.W.Washington, DC 20530(202) 2522545Fax: (202) 5148780Email: [email protected] ATTORNEYATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

    Defendant

    Case: 1:12-cv-01143-RJL As of: 04/23/2014 01:30 PM EDT 3 of 7

    JA03

    USCA Case #13-5272 Document #1490172 Filed: 04/25/2014 Page 5 of 60

  • UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OFSTATE

    represented by Wynne Patrick Kelly(See above for address)LEAD ATTORNEYATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

    DefendantHILLARY RODHAM CLINTONin her official capacity as Secretary of theU.S. Department of State

    represented by Wynne Patrick Kelly(See above for address)LEAD ATTORNEYATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

    DefendantJANICE JACOBSin her official capacity as U.S. AssistantSecretary of State for Consular Affairs

    represented by Wynne Patrick Kelly(See above for address)LEAD ATTORNEYATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

    MovantAMERICAN SAMOAGOVERNMENT

    represented by Frank S. SwainFAEGRE BAKER &DANIELS LLP1050 K Street, NWSuite 400Washington, DC 20001(202) 3127461Fax: (202) 3127460Email: [email protected] ATTORNEYATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

    AmicusENI F.H. FALEOMAVAEGA represented by Elizabeth M Locke

    CLARE LOCKE, LLP902 Prince StreetAlexandria, VA 22314(202) 6287402Email: [email protected] ATTORNEYATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

    Michael F. WilliamsKIRKLAND &ELLIS LLP655 15th Street, NWWashington, DC 20005(202) 8795123Email: [email protected] ATTORNEYATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

    Date Filed # Docket Text07/10/2012 1 COMPLAINT for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief against All Defendants (

    Filing fee $ 350 receipt number 00902997713) filed by SAMOANFEDERATION OF AMERICA, INC., FANUATANU FAUESALA LIFAMAMEA, VA'ALEAMA TOVIA FOSI, TAFFYLEI T. MAENE, LENEUOTIFIAFIA TUAUA, EMY FIATALA AFALAVA. (Attachments: # 1 ExhibitEXHIBIT A, # 2 Civil Cover Sheet, # 3 Summons, # 4 Summons, # 5 Summons, #6 Summons, # 7 Summons)(Hussain, Murad) (Entered: 07/10/2012)

    07/10/2012 2 LCvR 7.1 CERTIFICATE OF DISCLOSURE of Corporate Affiliations andFinancial Interests by SAMOAN FEDERATION OF AMERICA, INC. (Hussain,Murad) (Entered: 07/10/2012)

    Case: 1:12-cv-01143-RJL As of: 04/23/2014 01:30 PM EDT 4 of 7

    JA04

    USCA Case #13-5272 Document #1490172 Filed: 04/25/2014 Page 6 of 60

  • 07/10/2012 Case Assigned to Judge Richard J. Leon. (mmh) (Entered: 07/11/2012)07/11/2012 3 Electronic Summons (4) Issued as to HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON, JANICE

    JACOBS, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.(Attachments: # 1 Summons, # 2 Summons, # 3 Summons, # 4 Summons, # 5Consent Notices)(ls, ) (Entered: 07/11/2012)

    07/17/2012 4 STANDING ORDER. Signed by Judge Richard J. Leon on 7/17/2012. (lcrjl1)(Entered: 07/17/2012)

    08/01/2012 5 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed.HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON served on 7/19/2012; JANICE JACOBS servedon 7/19/2012; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE served on 7/19/2012; UNITEDSTATES OF AMERICA served on 7/19/2012, RETURN OFSERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed on United StatesAttorney General. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney General07/19/2012., RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and ComplaintExecuted as to the United States Attorney. Date of Service Upon United StatesAttorney on 7/19/2012. ( Answer due for ALL FEDERAL DEFENDANTS by9/17/2012.) (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit, # 2 Exhibit, # 3 Exhibit)(Hussain, Murad)(Entered: 08/01/2012)

    09/14/2012 6 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re 1 Complaint, byHILLARY RODHAM CLINTON, JANICE JACOBS, U.S. DEPARTMENT OFSTATE, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (Attachments: # 1 Text of ProposedOrder)(Kelly, Wynne) (Entered: 09/14/2012)

    09/17/2012 MINUTE ORDER granting 6 Consent Motion for Extension of Time to FileAnswer. It is hereby ORDERED that defendants shall have up to and includingOctober 17, 2012 to respond to plaintiffs' complaint. Signed by Judge Richard J.Leon on 9/17/12. (lcrjl1) (Entered: 09/17/2012)

    10/16/2012 7 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re 1 Complaint, byHILLARY RODHAM CLINTON, JANICE JACOBS, U.S. DEPARTMENT OFSTATE, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (Attachments: # 1 Text of ProposedOrder)(Kelly, Wynne) (Entered: 10/16/2012)

    10/19/2012 MINUTE ORDER granting nunc pro tunc 7 Consent Motion for Extension of Timeto Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiffs' Complaint. It is hereby ORDEREDthat the motion is GRANTED nunc pro tunc and that defendants shall have up toand including October 31, 2012 to respond to plaintiffs' complaint. Signed byJudge Richard J. Leon on 10/19/12. (lcrjl1) (Entered: 10/19/2012)

    10/22/2012 Set/Reset Deadlines: defendants response/answer to complaint due by 10/31/2012.(kc ) (Entered: 10/22/2012)

    10/31/2012 8 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re 1 Complaint, Due toHurricane Sandy by HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON, JANICE JACOBS, U.S.DEPARTMENT OF STATE, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Kelly, Wynne) (Entered: 10/31/2012)

    11/07/2012 MINUTE ORDER granting nunc pro tunc 8 Motion for Extension of Time. It ishereby ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED nunc pro tunc and thatdefendants shall have up to and including November 7, 2012 to respond toplaintiffs' complaint. Signed by Judge Richard J. Leon on 11/7/12. (lcrjl1)(Entered: 11/07/2012)

    11/07/2012 9 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint by HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON,JANICE JACOBS, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE, UNITED STATES OFAMERICA (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Kelly, Wynne) (Entered:11/07/2012)

    11/08/2012 10 MOTION for Leave to File AMICUS CURIAE by ENI F.H. FALEOMAVAEGA(Attachments: # 1 Proposed Amicus Brief, # 2 Text of Proposed Order)(rdj)(Entered: 11/09/2012)

    11/13/2012 11 NOTICE OF NONOPPOSITION TO THE MOTION OF THE HONORABLE ENIF.H. FALEOMAVAEGA FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR AS AMICUS CURIAE by EMY

    Case: 1:12-cv-01143-RJL As of: 04/23/2014 01:30 PM EDT 5 of 7

    JA05

    USCA Case #13-5272 Document #1490172 Filed: 04/25/2014 Page 7 of 60

  • FIATALA AFALAVA, VA'ALEAMA TOVIA FOSI, TAFFYLEI T. MAENE,FANUATANU FAUESALA LIFA MAMEA, SAMOAN FEDERATION OFAMERICA, INC., LENEUOTI FIAFIA TUAUA re 10 MOTION for Leave to File(Hussain, Murad) (Entered: 11/13/2012)

    11/15/2012 MINUTE ORDER granting 10 Motion for Leave to File Amicus Curiae. It ishereby ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED and that the Brief of theHonorable Eni F.H. Faleomavaega as Amicus Curiae in Support of Defendants isaccepted as filed with the Court. Signed by Judge Richard J. Leon on 11/15/12.(lcrjl1) (Entered: 11/15/2012)

    11/15/2012 12 AMICUS BRIEF by ENI F.H. FALEOMAVAEGA. (znmw, ) (Entered:11/16/2012)

    11/19/2012 13 Joint MOTION for Briefing Schedule (Joint Motion to Revise Existing FilingDeadlines and Set a Briefing Schedule) by EMY FIATALA AFALAVA,VA'ALEAMA TOVIA FOSI, TAFFYLEI T. MAENE, FANUATANUFAUESALA LIFA MAMEA, SAMOAN FEDERATION OF AMERICA, INC.,LENEUOTI FIAFIA TUAUA (Hussain, Murad) (Entered: 11/19/2012)

    11/20/2012 MINUTE ORDER : Setting a Status Conference set for 11/30/2012 02:30 PM inCourtroom 18 before Judge Richard J. Leon. SO ORDERED. (tb, ) (Entered:11/20/2012)

    11/28/2012 14 NOTICE of Appearance by Judith Ellen Schaeffer on behalf of All Plaintiffs(Schaeffer, Judith) (Entered: 11/28/2012)

    11/29/2012 15 NOTICE of Appearance by Robert J. Katerberg on behalf of All Plaintiffs(Katerberg, Robert) (Entered: 11/29/2012)

    11/29/2012 16 NOTICE of Appearance by Neil C. Weare on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Weare, Neil)(Entered: 11/29/2012)

    11/29/2012 17 NOTICE of Appearance by Elizabeth Bonnie Wydra on behalf of All Plaintiffs(Wydra, Elizabeth) (Entered: 11/29/2012)

    11/30/2012 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Richard J. Leon. StatusConference held on 11/30/2012. Joint MOTION for Briefing Schedule 13 DENIED. Plaintiff's Brief due by 12/7/2012. Defendant's Reply due by 12/12/2012.Status Conference set for 12/17/2012 02:30 PM in Courtroom 18 before JudgeRichard J. Leon. (Court Reporter Patty Gels.) (kc ) Modified on 12/4/2012 (kc ).(Entered: 11/30/2012)

    12/07/2012 18 Memorandum in opposition to re 9 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint filedby EMY FIATALA AFALAVA, VA'ALEAMA TOVIA FOSI, TAFFYLEI T.MAENE, FANUATANU FAUESALA LIFA MAMEA, SAMOANFEDERATION OF AMERICA, INC., LENEUOTI FIAFIA TUAUA.(Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Hussain, Murad) (Entered: 12/07/2012)

    12/07/2012 19 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by EMY FIATALA AFALAVA, VA'ALEAMATOVIA FOSI, TAFFYLEI T. MAENE, FANUATANU FAUESALA LIFAMAMEA, SAMOAN FEDERATION OF AMERICA, INC., LENEUOTI FIAFIATUAUA re 18 Memorandum in Opposition, on Counsel for Amicus Curiae.(Hussain, Murad) (Entered: 12/07/2012)

    12/12/2012 20 REPLY to opposition to motion re 9 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaintfiled by HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON, JANICE JACOBS, U.S.DEPARTMENT OF STATE, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. (Kelly, Wynne)(Entered: 12/12/2012)

    12/12/2012 21 REPLY to opposition to motion re 9 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint byAmicus Curiae filed by ENI F.H. FALEOMAVAEGA. (Williams, Michael)(Entered: 12/12/2012)

    12/13/2012 22 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael F. Williams on behalf of ENI F.H.FALEOMAVAEGA (Williams, Michael) (Main Document 22 replaced on12/14/2012) (znmw, ). (Entered: 12/13/2012)

    Case: 1:12-cv-01143-RJL As of: 04/23/2014 01:30 PM EDT 6 of 7

    JA06

    USCA Case #13-5272 Document #1490172 Filed: 04/25/2014 Page 8 of 60

  • 12/17/2012 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Richard J. Leon: Oral ArgumentHearing held on 12/17/2012. The Court takes matter under advisement. (CourtReporter Patty Gels.) (kc) (Entered: 12/17/2012)

    06/25/2013 23 MOTION to Intervene as a Defendant by AMERICAN SAMOA GOVERNMENT(Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(znmw, ) (Entered: 06/26/2013)

    06/26/2013 24 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Richard J. Leon on 6/26/2013. (kc) (Entered: 06/26/2013)

    06/26/2013 25 ORDER, For the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, itis hereby ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint 9 isGRANTED; and it is further ORDERED that plaintiffs' complaint is dismissed. SOORDERED. Signed by Judge Richard J. Leon on 6/26/2013. (see order) (kc )(Entered: 06/26/2013)

    06/26/2013 MINUTE ORDER denying as moot 23 Motion to Intervene as a Defendant. In lightof the 25 Order dismissing plaintiffs' complaint, it is hereby ORDERED that theMotion to Intervene as a Defendant is DENIED as moot. Signed by Judge RichardJ. Leon on 6/26/13. (lcrjl1) (Entered: 06/26/2013)

    08/23/2013 26 NOTICE OF APPEAL TO DC CIRCUIT COURT as to 25 Order on Motion toDismiss, by EMY FIATALA AFALAVA, VA'ALEAMA TOVIA FOSI,TAFFYLEI T. MAENE, FANUATANU FAUESALA LIFA MAMEA,SAMOAN FEDERATION OF AMERICA, INC., LENEUOTI FIAFIA TUAUA.Filing fee $ 455, receipt number 00903442951. Fee Status: Fee Paid. Parties havebeen notified. (Hussain, Murad) (Entered: 08/23/2013)

    08/26/2013 27 Transmission of the Notice of Appeal, Order Appealed, and Docket Sheet to USCourt of Appeals. The Court of Appeals fee was paid this date re 26 Notice ofAppeal to DC Circuit Court,. (znmw, ) (Entered: 08/26/2013)

    09/09/2013 USCA Case Number 135272 for 26 Notice of Appeal to DC Circuit Court, filedby FANUATANU FAUESALA LIFA MAMEA, VA'ALEAMA TOVIA FOSI,EMY FIATALA AFALAVA, TAFFYLEI T. MAENE, LENEUOTI FIAFIATUAUA, SAMOAN FEDERATION OF AMERICA, INC.. (jf, ) (Entered:09/09/2013)

    04/23/2014 28 TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS before Judge Richard J. Leon held on12/17/12; Date of Issuance:4/22/14. Court Reporter/Transcriber Patty Gels,Telephone number 2023543236, Court Reporter Email Address :[email protected] the first 90 days after this filing date,the transcript may be viewed at the courthouse at a public terminal or purchasedfrom the court reporter referenced above. After 90 days, the transcript may beaccessed via PACER. Other transcript formats, (multipage, condensed, CD orASCII) may be purchased from the court reporter.NOTICE REREDACTION OF TRANSCRIPTS: The parties have twentyone days to filewith the court and the court reporter any request to redact personal identifiers fromthis transcript. If no such requests are filed, the transcript will be made available tothe public via PACER without redaction after 90 days. The policy, which includesthe five personal identifiers specifically covered, is located on our website atww.dcd.uscourts.gov. Redaction Request due 5/14/2014. RedactedTranscript Deadline set for 5/24/2014. Release of Transcript Restriction set for7/22/2014.(Gels, Patty) (Entered: 04/23/2014)

    Case: 1:12-cv-01143-RJL As of: 04/23/2014 01:30 PM EDT 7 of 7

    JA07

    USCA Case #13-5272 Document #1490172 Filed: 04/25/2014 Page 9 of 60

  • UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTFOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

    LENEUOTI FIAFIA TUAUA2242 Alii StreetFagaalu, AS 96799;

    VAALEAMA TOVIA FOSI4428 Sierra DriveHonolulu, HI 96816;

    FANUATANU FAUESALA LIFA MAMEA,on his own behalf and on behalf of hisminor children, M.F.M., L.C.M., and E.T.M.

    Mamea Residence (no street address)P.O. Box 3010Tafuna, AS 96799;

    TAFFY-LEI T. MAENE10455 Des Moines Memorial Drive, Suite 301Seattle, WA 98168;

    EMY FIATALA AFALAVA6909 Ottoville StreetPago Pago, AS 96799; and

    SAMOAN FEDERATIONOF AMERICA, INC.

    404 E. Carson StreetCarson, CA 90745,

    Plaintiffs,

    v.

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICAServe to:U.S. Attorney General950 Pennsylvania Avenue NWWashington, DC 20530;U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia555 4th Street NWWashington, DC 20530;

    ))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))

    Civil Action No. 12-1143

    Case 1:12-cv-01143 Document 1 Filed 07/10/12 Page 1 of 27

    JA08

    USCA Case #13-5272 Document #1490172 Filed: 04/25/2014 Page 10 of 60

  • - 2 -

    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE2201 C Street NWWashington, DC 20520;

    HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON,in her official capacity asSecretary of the U.S. Department of State

    2201 C Street NWWashington, DC 20520; and

    JANICE L. JACOBS,in her official capacity asU.S. Assistant Secretary of Statefor Consular Affairs

    2201 C Street NWWashington, DC 20520,

    Defendants.

    ))))))))))))))))))))

    COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

    Plaintiffs Leneuoti Fiafia Tuaua, Vaaleama Tovia Fosi, Fanuatanu Fauesala Lifa Mamea

    and his minor children M.F.M., L.C.M., and E.T.M, Taffy-lei T. Maene, Emy Fiatala Afalava

    (the Individual Plaintiffs), and Samoan Federation of America, Inc. (collectively, Plaintiffs),

    for their Complaint against the United States, the U.S. Department of State (State Department),

    U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, and U.S. Assistant Secretary of State Janice L.

    Jacobs (collectively, Defendants), allege as follows:

    NATURE OF THE ACTION

    1. In this action, Plaintiffs seek a declaratory judgment that the Citizenship Clause of

    the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution applies throughout the United

    States, including the U.S. territory of American Samoa.

    2. The Citizenship Clause provides: All persons born . . . in the United States, and

    Case 1:12-cv-01143 Document 1 Filed 07/10/12 Page 2 of 27

    JA09

    USCA Case #13-5272 Document #1490172 Filed: 04/25/2014 Page 11 of 60

  • - 3 -

    subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States . . . . U.S. Const. amend.

    XIV, 1, cl. 1.

    3. The Samoan islands are an archipelago located in the South Pacific, midway

    between Hawaii and New Zealand. The eastern islands comprise the U.S. territory of American

    Samoa, which the United States first claimed in 1900; the western islands comprise the

    independent nation of Samoa.

    4. The U.S. territory of American Samoa is within the limits and under the

    jurisdiction of the United States.

    5. The Individual Plaintiffs were born in American Samoa. Therefore, they are U.S.

    citizens by virtue of the Citizenship Clause.

    6. The Defendants recognize that the Individual Plaintiffs are Americans, but deny

    that they are U.S. citizens. Instead, the Defendants classify the Individual Plaintiffs as so-called

    non-citizen nationals of the United States, as reflected in Section 308(1) of the Immigration

    and Nationality Act of 1952 (INA) (codified at 8 U.S.C. 1408(1)) and the State Departments

    Foreign Affairs Manual (FAM) at 7 FAM 1125.1(b)-(c).

    7. The State Department has given effect to the non-citizen national classification

    by imprinting a disclaimer of citizenship known as Endorsement Code 09 in the U.S. passports

    issued to persons born in American Samoa, including the Individual Plaintiffs. Endorsement

    Code 09 states: THE BEARER IS A UNITED STATES NATIONAL AND NOT A UNITED

    STATES CITIZEN. See, e.g., Ex. A at 2 (endorsement page of Plaintiff Tuauas passport).

    8. Persons born in American Samoa who are classified as non-citizen nationals of

    the United States do not have the same rights and privileges as do persons classified as citizens

    of the United States. Among other things, many federal, state, and municipal laws require that a

    Case 1:12-cv-01143 Document 1 Filed 07/10/12 Page 3 of 27

    JA10

    USCA Case #13-5272 Document #1490172 Filed: 04/25/2014 Page 12 of 60

  • - 4 -

    person be a U.S. citizen in order to enjoy certain civil, political, and economic liberties, such as

    the right to vote, serve on a jury, bear arms, and hold certain forms of public sector employment.

    9. Plaintiffs seek a declaratory judgment that persons born in American Samoa are

    citizens of the United States by virtue of the Citizenship Clause, and that INA 308(1) and the

    State Departments policy and practice of imprinting Endorsement Code 09 in such persons

    passports are unconstitutional. Plaintiffs also seek an injunction restraining the State Department

    from imprinting Endorsement Code 09 in the passports of persons born in American Samoa and

    requiring that it issue new passports to the Individual Plaintiffs that do not otherwise disclaim

    that they are citizens of the United States, in order to ensure that their citizenship is

    acknowledged by those who look to the State Departments issuance of a U.S. passport as

    conclusive proof of U.S. citizenship.

    PARTIES

    10. a. Plaintiff Leneuoti FiaFia Tuaua was born in the U.S. territory of American

    Samoa in 1951; he currently resides in Fagaalu, American Samoa.

    b. The Defendants do not recognize Mr. Tuaua as a citizen of the United

    States. To the contrary, the Defendants have issued a U.S. passport to Mr. Tuaua that is

    imprinted with Endorsement Code 09, which states that he is not a citizen of the United States.

    See Ex. A.

    c. From 1969 to 1976, Mr. Tuaua lived in Daly City, California. While

    attending Skyline College in California, Mr. Tuaua registered for the military draft. At the same

    time, Mr. Tuaua was ineligible to vote under California law because he was not recognized as a

    citizen of the United States. Mr. Tuaua was interested in pursuing a career in law enforcement in

    California, and he scored well on entrance examinations at the California Highway Patrol and the

    Case 1:12-cv-01143 Document 1 Filed 07/10/12 Page 4 of 27

    JA11

    USCA Case #13-5272 Document #1490172 Filed: 04/25/2014 Page 13 of 60

  • - 5 -

    San Mateo County Sheriffs Office. However, only U.S. citizens and permanent resident aliens

    who have applied for citizenship are eligible to serve as peace officers in California. See Cal

    Gov. Code. 1031. Mr. Tuaua moved back to American Samoa and pursued a law enforcement

    career there, retiring in 2007 after 30 years of distinguished service, including many years of

    service as Marshal for the High Court of American Samoa.

    d. Mr. Tuaua would like to obtain a U.S. passport recognizing that he is a

    citizen, so that he can enjoy the same rights and benefits and be eligible for the same

    opportunities as all other persons born in the United States. In addition, Mr. Tuaua has two

    young children, ages 10 and 15, and he would like them to grow up having all of the

    opportunities of U.S. citizens and not suffer the burdens and harms of being classified as non-

    citizen nationals.

    11. a. Plaintiff Vaaleama Tovia Fosi was born in the U.S. territory of American

    Samoa in 1965; he currently lives in Honolulu, Hawaii.

    b. The Defendants do not recognize Mr. Fosi as a citizen of the United

    States. To the contrary, the Defendants have issued a U.S. passport to Mr. Fosi imprinted with

    Endorsement Code 09, which states that he is not a citizen of the United States.

    c. When he was a high school senior in American Samoa, Mr. Fosi was

    recruited by the U.S. Army to join its early entry program. In 1983, Mr. Fosi enlisted in the U.S.

    Army Reserves on active duty status while attending American Samoa Community College. In

    1985, Mr. Fosi took inactive status in the Reserves when he transferred to the University of

    Hawaii at Manoa. While in college, Mr. Fosi sought part-time employment, but discovered that

    because the Defendants classified him as a non-citizen national, he was ineligible for federal

    work study programs and certain other federal employment opportunities. In 1987, Mr. Fosi was

    Case 1:12-cv-01143 Document 1 Filed 07/10/12 Page 5 of 27

    JA12

    USCA Case #13-5272 Document #1490172 Filed: 04/25/2014 Page 14 of 60

  • - 6 -

    commissioned as an officer in the Hawaii Army National Guard. In 1993, he transferred to the

    U.S. Army Reserve in Hawaii. In 1994, he was honorably discharged as a First Lieutenant.

    d. Because U.S. citizenship is a requirement for service as an officer in the

    Hawaii National Guard, Mr. Fosi believed that he had been naturalized in 1987 in connection

    with his military service. However, when Mr. Fosi renewed his U.S. passport in 1999, he

    discovered that the Defendants had imprinted his passport with Endorsement Code 09, which

    states that he is not a U.S. citizen. When he expressed surprise and disappointment to the

    passport officer who gave him his passport, Mr. Fosi was informed that regardless of his military

    service, the State Department does not recognize him as a U.S. citizen.

    e. Because the Defendants do not recognize Mr. Fosi as a U.S. citizen, and

    because he cannot obtain a U.S. passport proving that he is, Mr. Fosi is denied the right to vote

    and the right to bear arms under Hawaii law. See, e.g., Haw. Const. art. II, 1 (right to vote);

    Haw. Rev. Stat. 134-2(d) (restricting issuance of firearms permits to U.S. citizens and select

    aliens).

    f. Mr. Fosi would like to obtain a U.S. passport recognizing that he is a

    citizen so that he can enjoy the same rights and benefits and be eligible for the same

    opportunities as all other persons born in the United States, including the rights to vote and to

    bear arms.

    12. a. Plaintiff Fanuatanu F. L. Mamea was born in the U.S. territory of

    American Samoa in 1941. He brings this action on behalf of himself and his three minor

    children, M.F.M., age 5; L.C.M., age 4; and E.T.M., age 2, all of whom were born in American

    Samoa and who reside with Mr. Mamea in Tafuna, American Samoa.

    b. The Defendants do not recognize Mr. Mamea or his minor children as

    Case 1:12-cv-01143 Document 1 Filed 07/10/12 Page 6 of 27

    JA13

    USCA Case #13-5272 Document #1490172 Filed: 04/25/2014 Page 15 of 60

  • - 7 -

    citizens of the United States. To the contrary, the Defendants have issued U.S. passports to Mr.

    Mamea and his minor children imprinted with Endorsement Code 09, which state that they are

    not citizens of the United States.

    c. In 1964, Mr. Mamea enlisted in the U.S. Army while living in Hawaii. In

    1965, he applied to join the U.S. Special Forces, but, according to his supervisors, his application

    was denied because the United States did not recognize him as a citizen. Mr. Mamea later

    served in Vietnam, where he sustained serious injuries during combat for which he was awarded

    two Purple Hearts. Mr. Mamea was honorably discharged in 1984.

    d. Prior to returning to American Samoa in 1984, Mr. Mamea resided in the

    states of Hawaii, California, Washington, and South Carolina for approximately 20 years.

    During this time, Mr. Mamea was unable to vote in state and federal elections because the

    Defendants did not, and still do not, recognize him as a U.S. citizen.

    e. Mr. Mamea has a combined disability rating of 80% based on

    complications from his combat injuries. In the past, Mr. Mamea has had to travel to Hawaii to

    receive medical care at the Veterans Affairs hospital. He expects that he will have to undertake

    similar travel in the future. Because Mr. Mameas wife is a Tongan national, she is unable to

    join him in Hawaii to help with his care unless she first obtains a visa. To obtain an immigration

    visa, Mrs. Mamea would have to wait several years for her priority number to be called, whereas

    if Mr. Mamea were recognized as a citizen, his wife would be eligible for a K-3 non-immigrant

    visa during the processing of her immigration application, and she could travel to Hawaii

    immediately to assist Mr. Mamea when he seeks medical care there. In addition, upon approval

    of her immigration visa application, there would be no waiting period for her to be able to

    receive her visa.

    Case 1:12-cv-01143 Document 1 Filed 07/10/12 Page 7 of 27

    JA14

    USCA Case #13-5272 Document #1490172 Filed: 04/25/2014 Page 16 of 60

  • - 8 -

    f. Mr. Mamea would like to obtain a U.S. passport recognizing that he is a

    U.S. citizen so that he can receive the same rights and benefits and be eligible for the same

    opportunities as all other persons born in the United States, including the ability to obtain

    immigration priority for his spouse. Mr. Mamea also wants his children to grow up having all of

    the opportunities of U.S. citizens and not suffer the burdens and harms of being classified as

    non-citizen nationals.

    13. a. Plaintiff Taffy-lei T. Maene was born in the U.S. territory of American

    Samoa in 1978; she currently lives in Seattle, Washington.

    b. The Defendants do not recognize Ms. Maene as a citizen of the United

    States. To the contrary, when the Defendants issued Ms. Maene a U.S. passport in 1995 under

    her former name, her passport was imprinted with Endorsement Code 09, which states that she is

    not a citizen of the United States.

    c. In February 2011, Ms. Maene was hired as a Licensing Services

    Representative by the Washington State Department of Licensing. In January 2012, two weeks

    before the end of her one-year probationary period, Ms. Maene was required to produce a U.S.

    passport or other evidence demonstrating her citizenship as a condition of being retained as a

    permanent employee. Ms. Maene was unable to do so because the Defendants do not recognize

    her as a citizen. Ms. Maene was released from her job and informed by her employer that the

    only reason she was being denied permanent employment was because she could not

    demonstrate that she was a U.S. citizen. The loss of her job deprived Ms. Maene of her salary

    and her health insurance. Subsequently, Ms. Maene has been deterred from applying for federal

    positions whose job postings state that U.S. citizenship is a prerequisite for consideration.

    d. Although Ms. Maene has been a resident of Washington State since 2006,

    Case 1:12-cv-01143 Document 1 Filed 07/10/12 Page 8 of 27

    JA15

    USCA Case #13-5272 Document #1490172 Filed: 04/25/2014 Page 17 of 60

  • - 9 -

    she is ineligible to vote under Washington law because the Defendants do not recognize her as a

    U.S. citizen and will not provide her with a passport proving that she is. In 2010, Ms. Maene

    sought to obtain an Enhanced Drivers License to facilitate travel to Canada, but was informed

    by Washington State officials that she is ineligible to obtain such a license because she is not

    recognized as a U.S. citizen.

    e. Ms. Maene would like to sponsor her mother, who is a national of the

    independent nation of Samoa, for immigration so she can join Ms. Maene in Washington State,

    but is unable to do so because the Defendants do not recognize Ms. Maene as a citizen.

    f. Ms. Maene would like to obtain a U.S. passport recognizing she is a

    citizen so that she can enjoy the same rights and benefits and be eligible for the same

    opportunities as all other persons born in the United States, such as voting, seeking and

    maintaining employment for which citizenship is a requirement, and sponsoring her mother for

    immigration purposes.

    14. a. Plaintiff Emy Fiatala Afalava was born in the U.S. territory of American

    Samoa in 1964, and currently resides in Tafuna, American Samoa.

    b. The Defendants do not recognize Mr. Afalava as a citizen of the United

    States. To the contrary, the Defendants issued Mr. Afalava a U.S. passport in 2012 imprinted

    with Endorsement Code 09, stating that he is not a citizen of the United States.

    c. When Mr. Afalava was a high school senior in American Samoa, he was

    recruited by the U.S. Army to join the U.S. Army Reserves, enlisting on reserve status in 1981.

    In 1985, Mr. Afalava transferred into the active duty U.S. Army and was stationed in Fort Hood,

    Texas. In 1990, Mr. Afalava was deployed as part of Operations Desert Shield and Desert

    Storm, serving in the infantry during the Liberation of Kuwait. Mr. Afalava also served overseas

    Case 1:12-cv-01143 Document 1 Filed 07/10/12 Page 9 of 27

    JA16

    USCA Case #13-5272 Document #1490172 Filed: 04/25/2014 Page 18 of 60

  • - 10 -

    in Germany and Korea before being honorably discharged in 1996. In 2010, Mr. Afalava was

    diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder related to his experiences during Operations Desert

    Shield and Desert Storm.

    d. Before returning to American Samoa in 1999, Mr. Afalava resided in the

    continental United States for approximately 13 years, including in Fort Hood, Texas; Fort Sill,

    Oklahoma; and San Diego, California. Because the Defendants do not recognize Mr. Afalava as

    a U.S. citizen, he could not obtain a U.S. passport proving his citizenship and was unable to vote

    during this time. For example, he could not join his infantry colleagues, with whom he had

    served during the 1991 Liberation of Kuwait, in going to the polls to vote in the 1992

    presidential election. The fact that the Defendants do not recognize Mr. Afalavas citizenship

    was, and continues to be, emotionally distressing to him.

    e. Mr. Afalava would like to obtain a U.S. passport recognizing that he is a

    citizen so that he can enjoy the same rights and benefits and be eligible for the same

    opportunities as all other persons born in the United States.

    15. a. Plaintiff Samoan Federation of America, Inc. (hereafter, Samoan

    Federation) is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization based in Carson, California. The Samoan

    Federation is a social services organization that serves the Samoan community in the greater Los

    Angeles area. Founded in 1965, it is one of the oldest Samoan organizations in the continental

    United States.

    b. The Samoan Federations activities include helping promote the political

    empowerment of the Samoan community in California. The Samoan Federation holds regular

    voter registration drives during election years and is already planning its drives for the 2012

    election. Recognition by the United States that all persons born in American Samoa are U.S.

    Case 1:12-cv-01143 Document 1 Filed 07/10/12 Page 10 of 27

    JA17

    USCA Case #13-5272 Document #1490172 Filed: 04/25/2014 Page 19 of 60

  • - 11 -

    citizens would significantly advance the Samoan Federations efforts to increase the political

    voice of the Samoan community.

    c. The Samoan Federation also expends some of its limited resources helping

    members of the Samoan community with the complex naturalization process and family

    immigration issues. For example, the Samoan Federation runs a weekly English-as-a-Second-

    Language class for senior citizens that is intended, in part, to prepare Samoan speakers for the

    naturalization exam and interview. The Samoan Federation also runs a referral service for

    individuals who are classified as non-citizen nationals and who require naturalization or other

    assistance. If the Defendants were to recognize that all persons born in American Samoa are

    U.S. citizens, the Samoan Federation would not have to divert its limited resources to helping

    persons classified as non-citizen nationals to naturalize, and it could better assist them with

    other needs.

    16. The United States, which exercises sovereignty over the U.S. territory of

    American Samoa, is a Defendant based on the actions and conduct of its agents, which include

    but are not limited to the U.S. Department of State, the Secretary of State, and the Assistant

    Secretary of State for Consular Affairs.

    17. Defendant U.S. Department of State (State Department) is an executive

    department of the United States. The State Department, through its Bureau of Consular Affairs,

    is responsible for the issuance of United States passports. The State Departments headquarters

    is located in Washington, D.C.

    18. Defendant Hillary Rodham Clinton is being sued in her official capacity as the

    Secretary of State. Under federal law, Secretary Clinton or her designee is directly responsible

    for the execution and administration of the statutes and regulations governing the issuance of

    Case 1:12-cv-01143 Document 1 Filed 07/10/12 Page 11 of 27

    JA18

    USCA Case #13-5272 Document #1490172 Filed: 04/25/2014 Page 20 of 60

  • - 12 -

    U.S. passports. See 22 U.S.C. 211A. Secretary Clinton accomplishes this function through

    the Bureau of Consular Affairs . . . . 7 FAM 1311(e).

    19. Defendant Janice Jacobs is being sued in her official capacity as the Assistant

    Secretary of State for Consular Affairs. In that capacity, Ambassador Jacobs is responsible for

    the State Departments Bureau of Consular Affairs and the creation of policies and procedures

    relating to the issuance of passports. See 1 FAM 251.1(d). Accordingly, she is Secretary

    Clintons designee as to the execution and administration of the statues and regulations

    governing the issuance of U.S. passports.

    JURISDICTION AND VENUE

    20. This action seeks declaratory relief under the Federal Declaratory Judgment Act

    of 1934, 28 U.S.C. 2201-2202.

    21. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. 1331 because

    Plaintiffs causes of action arise under the U.S. Constitution. Plaintiffs also seek review under

    the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 701-706, because the State Departments practice

    of placing Endorsement Code 09 in the passports of persons born in American Samoa is contrary

    to their constitutional rights, and is also arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise

    not in accordance with law.

    22. Sovereign immunity has been waived by 5 U.S.C. 702.

    23. Venue is proper in this district under 28 U.S.C. 1391(e).

    Case 1:12-cv-01143 Document 1 Filed 07/10/12 Page 12 of 27

    JA19

    USCA Case #13-5272 Document #1490172 Filed: 04/25/2014 Page 21 of 60

  • - 13 -

    FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS

    American Samoas History as Part of the United States

    24. The United States claimed American Samoa pursuant to the Tripartite Convention

    of 1899 among the United States, Great Britain, and Germany. See 31 Stat. 1878 (ratified Feb.

    16, 1900).

    25. The American flag was raised over American Samoa on April 17, 1900, during a

    ceremony in which the traditional leaders of the islands of Tutuila and Aunuu signed Deeds of

    Cession formally ceding sovereignty of their islands to the United States. See 48 U.S.C. 1661.

    Similar Deeds of Cession were signed by the traditional leaders of the Manua islands in 1904.

    See id. In 1925, federal law recognized the atoll of Swains Island as part of American Samoa.

    See id. 1662.

    26. Over the past 112 years, American Samoas ties to the rest of the United States

    have strengthened significantly as American Samoa has been integrated into the nations

    political, economic, and cultural identity.

    27. During American Samoas first 51 years as part of the United States, it was

    administered by the U.S. Navy, with limited self-governance. In 1951, authority was transferred

    to the Department of the Interior, which retains general administrative supervision to this day. In

    1967, the Secretary of the Interior approved the Constitution of American Samoa, establishing a

    tripartite government with a popularly elected bicameral legislature, an appointed governor, and

    an independent judiciary appointed by the Secretary. In 1977, the Secretary of the Interior

    provided for a popularly elected Governor. In 1978, Congress enacted legislation providing for a

    non-voting Delegate to represent American Samoa in the U.S. House of Representatives.

    28. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, when American Samoa became part of the

    Case 1:12-cv-01143 Document 1 Filed 07/10/12 Page 13 of 27

    JA20

    USCA Case #13-5272 Document #1490172 Filed: 04/25/2014 Page 22 of 60

  • - 14 -

    United States in 1900, its population was just over 5,600. Since then, its resident population has

    grown nearly tenfold to more than 55,500. Many generations of American Samoans also now

    live throughout the rest of the United States.

    29. When American Samoa first became a part of the United States, there was no

    public education system to speak of. Today, American Samoa has twenty-two primary schools,

    six secondary schools, and a community college in the public education system, with a

    curriculum reflecting U.S. educational standards.

    30. In 1900, the only meaningful way to travel or otherwise communicate between

    American Samoa and the rest of the United States was by ship. Today, the Internet and other

    technological advances allow instantaneous communication between American Samoa and the

    rest of the United States. Regular flights between American Samoas capital of Pago Pago and

    Honolulu have furthered American Samoas integration into the United States.

    31. American Samoans have served in the U.S. Armed Forces since the islands first

    became part of the United States. As early as July 1900, the Navy Commandant stationed in

    American Samoa was authorized to enlist 58 Samoans as Landsmen in the U.S. Navy to form

    the Fita Fita Guard, which supported the U.S. Navy during 51 years of naval administration in

    American Samoa. American Samoans have served the nation during every major war of the 20th

    and 21st Centuries. Today, American Samoas enlistment rate is among the highest in the

    nation and, on a per capita basis, American Samoa has made a greater sacrifice in Iraq and

    Afghanistan than has any other U.S. territory or state. The U.S. Army has a full-time recruiting

    station in American Samoa, and recruiters from other military branches also make regular

    recruiting visits. Supporting these efforts, American Samoas six public high schools host U.S.

    Army Junior Reserve Officer Training Corp (ROTC) programs, and the American Samoa

    Case 1:12-cv-01143 Document 1 Filed 07/10/12 Page 14 of 27

    JA21

    USCA Case #13-5272 Document #1490172 Filed: 04/25/2014 Page 23 of 60

  • - 15 -

    Community College hosts a U.S. Army ROTC program. The U.S. Military Academy, the U.S.

    Naval Academy, the U.S. Air Force Academy, and the U.S. Merchant Marine Academy each

    reserve space for two students from American Samoa to be appointed and enrolled.

    32. American Samoa is home to a multimillion dollar U.S. Army Reserve Center

    named in honor of the late Sergeant First Class Konelio Pele, an American Samoan who was

    awarded a Silver Star during the Vietnam War for his heroic efforts saving the lives of fellow

    Americans. American Samoa also supports a Community-Based Outpatient Clinic as part of the

    U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Pacific Islands Health Care System. The U.S. Coast Guard

    has a Marine Safety Detachment Unit based in American Samoa.

    33. The federal government has a strong civilian presence in American Samoa, with

    numerous federal agency offices in the territory. Like other Americans, American Samoans

    participate in and benefit from many federal programs.

    34. Congress has established the National Park of American Samoa as part of the

    National Park System. Twenty-three locations in American Samoa are also listed on the

    National Register of Historic Places, two of which Government House and the World War II

    Blunts Point Battery have received the official designation of National Historic Landmark.

    American Samoas Fagatele Bay is recognized as a National Marine Sanctuary.

    35. The United States has taken a number of actions reflecting and celebrating

    American Samoas integration into the nation. For example, on April 17, 2000, the United States

    Postal Service issued a stamp commemorating the centennial of American Samoa becoming a

    part of the United States. In 2008, the Postal Service released a stamp recognizing the flag of

    American Samoa as part of the Flags of Our Nation series honoring the flags of the 50 states,

    the five territories, and the District of Columbia. In July 2009, the United States Mint released

    Case 1:12-cv-01143 Document 1 Filed 07/10/12 Page 15 of 27

    JA22

    USCA Case #13-5272 Document #1490172 Filed: 04/25/2014 Page 24 of 60

  • - 16 -

    the American Samoa Quarter as part of its D.C. & U.S. Territories Quarters Program, following

    the popular 50 State Quarters Program. The Mint is also scheduled to release a quarter depicting

    the National Park of American Samoa in 2020 as part of its America the Beautiful Quarters

    Program.

    The Citizenship Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment

    36. The Citizenship Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment provides that [a]ll persons

    born . . . in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United

    States . . . . U.S. Const. amend. XIV, 1.

    37. Prior to ratification of the Fourteenth Amendment, the U.S. Supreme Court

    considered whether the term the United States, as used elsewhere in the Constitution,

    designate[s] the whole, or any particular portion of the American empire. Loughborough v.

    Blake, 18 U.S. 317, 319 (1820) (Marshall, C.J.). In its decision, the Court stated: Certainly this

    question can admit of but one answer. It is the name given to our great republic, which is

    composed of States and territories. The [D]istrict of Columbia, or the territory west of the

    Missouri, is not less within the United States than Maryland or Pennsylvania . . . . Id.

    (emphases added).

    38. In 1866, when the U.S. Senate was debating the Fourteenth Amendment, Senator

    Jacob Howard introduced the text of the Citizenship Clause and stated his belief that the Clause

    settles the great question of citizenship and removes all doubt as to what persons are or are not

    citizens of the United States. Cong. Globe, 39th Cong., 1st Sess. 2890, 2890 (1866).

    According to Senator Howard, he and other proponents of the Citizenship Clause desired to put

    this question of citizenship and the rights of citizens . . . beyond the legislative power . . . . Id.

    at 2896.

    Case 1:12-cv-01143 Document 1 Filed 07/10/12 Page 16 of 27

    JA23

    USCA Case #13-5272 Document #1490172 Filed: 04/25/2014 Page 25 of 60

  • - 17 -

    39. During this same Senate debate, Senator Lyman Trumbull, Chairman of the

    Senate Judiciary Committee, stated that the Fourteenth Amendments second section [i.e., the

    Apportionment Clause] refers to no persons except those in the States of the union; but the first

    section refers to persons everywhere, whether in the States or in the Territories or in the District

    of Columbia. Id. at 2894 (emphases added).

    40. In 1898, the U.S. Supreme Court stated that [t]he [Fourteenth] [A]mendment, in

    clear words and in manifest intent, includes the children born, within the territory of the United

    States, . . . of whatever race or color, domiciled within the United States. United States v. Wong

    Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649, 693 (1898) (emphasis added). The Court also stated that [t]he

    [F]ourteenth [A]mendment . . . has conferred no authority upon [C]ongress to restrict the effect

    of birth, declared by the [C]onstitution to constitute a sufficient and complete right to

    citizenship. Id. at 703.

    The Defendants Refuse to Recognize That Persons Born inAmerican Samoa Are U.S. Citizens under the Citizenship Clause,

    Classifying Them Instead as Non-Citizen Nationals

    41. Despite the text and history of the Citizenship Clause of the Fourteenth

    Amendment, the Defendants have refused to recognize that persons born in the U.S. territory of

    American Samoa are guaranteed U.S. citizenship by virtue of their birth within the United States.

    42. The Defendants have treated the citizenship status of persons born in the U.S.

    territories of American Samoa, Puerto Rico, Guam, the U.S. Virgin Islands, and the Northern

    Mariana Islands as subject to political determinations by the elected branches of the federal

    government.

    43. In 1917, Congress enacted a statute recognizing the citizenship of persons living

    in Puerto Rico at the time it was acquired by the United States, and persons born there

    Case 1:12-cv-01143 Document 1 Filed 07/10/12 Page 17 of 27

    JA24

    USCA Case #13-5272 Document #1490172 Filed: 04/25/2014 Page 26 of 60

  • - 18 -

    subsequently. Congress did the same for the inhabitants of the U.S. Virgin Islands in 1927 and

    for the inhabitants of Guam in 1950. In 1986, Congress enacted a law recognizing the

    inhabitants of the Northern Mariana Islands as U.S. citizens from the moment the United States

    established sovereignty over the islands.

    44. Congress has never enacted a statute recognizing the citizenship of American

    Samoans. Instead, Congress enacted Section 204(a) of the Nationality Act of 1940, which

    provided that persons born in American Samoa shall be recognized as nationals, but not

    citizens, of the United States at birth. This provision was reenacted in 1952 as INA 308(1)

    and subsequently codified at 8 U.S.C. 1408(1).

    45. Persons born in American Samoa are the only individuals whom the Defendants

    classify as non-citizen nationals.

    46. Under federal law, unless persons born in American Samoa obtain citizenship

    through parents who are already recognized as citizens, the only way they can be recognized as

    U.S. citizens is through naturalization.

    47. Until 1952, so-called non-citizen nationals of Samoan descent were not even

    permitted to naturalize under federal immigration law. Today, the lengthy, costly, and

    burdensome nature of the naturalization process deters and prevents many eligible adults from

    pursuing the naturalization process; moreover, minors are not permitted to apply for

    naturalization. The naturalization process can take a year or more to complete, with no

    guarantee of success, as the ultimate citizenship determination is made on a case-by-case basis

    by an officer of the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), an agency of the U.S.

    Department of Homeland Security.

    48. Although persons born in American Samoa who are classified by Defendants as

    Case 1:12-cv-01143 Document 1 Filed 07/10/12 Page 18 of 27

    JA25

    USCA Case #13-5272 Document #1490172 Filed: 04/25/2014 Page 27 of 60

  • - 19 -

    non-citizen nationals are Americans, they are treated the same as foreign nationals for most

    aspects of the naturalization process:

    a. Non-citizen nationals, like foreign nationals, must first establish

    residency for a period of three months in a USCIS district before applying to naturalize. There

    are no such districts in American Samoa, which means that a resident of American Samoa who

    wishes to apply to naturalize must bear the substantial costs and disruption of relocating to, and

    establishing residency in, another part of the United States. See 8 U.S.C. 1436.

    b. Non-citizen nationals, like foreign nationals, must take and pass the

    USCIS English and civics test, even though the public education curriculum in American Samoa

    is taught in English and reflects U.S. educational standards for English and language arts,

    American history, and American government.

    c. Non-citizen nationals, like foreign nationals, must submit to

    fingerprinting and a determination of their good moral character, including an in-person

    interview.

    d. Non-citizen nationals must take the same Oath of Allegiance that is

    required of foreign nationals, which includes an affirmation that they absolutely and entirely

    renounce and abjure all allegiance and fidelity to any foreign prince, potentate, state or

    sovereignty, of whom or which [they] have heretofore been a subject or citizen . . . . 8 C.F.R.

    1337.1. Yet by definition, all non-citizen nationals necessarily owe[] permanent allegiance to

    the United States, 8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(22), and many have already sworn an oath to defend the

    Constitution through military or other federal government service.

    e. Non-citizen nationals of the United States, like foreign nationals, must

    pay government fees currently totaling $680, in addition to any other expenses associated with

    Case 1:12-cv-01143 Document 1 Filed 07/10/12 Page 19 of 27

    JA26

    USCA Case #13-5272 Document #1490172 Filed: 04/25/2014 Page 28 of 60

  • - 20 -

    the naturalization process.

    The State Department Will Not Provide the Individual Plaintiffswith U.S. Passports Recognizing That They Are U.S. Citizens

    49. As reflected in the State Departments Foreign Affairs Manual, it is the State

    Departments policy that the Fourteenth Amendments Citizenship Clause does not apply to

    persons born in American Samoa. See 7 FAM 1125.1(b) ([T]he citizenship provisions of the

    Constitution do not apply to persons born there [i.e., American Samoa].).

    50. It is also the State Departments policy to recognize only non-citizen U.S.

    nationality for the people born . . . in American Samoa. 7 FAM 1125.1(d). This policy relies

    upon INA 308(1), which provides that persons born in American Samoa shall be nationals,

    but not citizens, of the United States at birth[.] 8 U.S.C. 1408(1); see 7 FAM 1125.1(d)-(e).

    51. A U.S. passport is the only federal document for which a member of the general

    public may apply in order to obtain official recognition that he or she is a U.S. citizen by virtue

    of birth in the United States.

    52. U.S. passports may only be issued by the State Department.

    53. According to the State Department, U.S. citizens and U.S. non-citizen nationals

    who have satisfactorily established their identity and citizenship/nationality . . . are entitled to

    U.S. passports. 7 FAM 1313(a). However, nationals of the United States who are not

    citizens are only entitled to U.S. passports with appropriate endorsements. Id. 1111(b)(1).

    54. It is the State Departments policy and practice to imprint Endorsement Code 09

    in the U.S. passports of persons born in American Samoa who are classified as non-citizen

    nationals. See 7 FAM 1130 Appx H (c). Endorsement Code 09 states: THE BEARER IS

    A UNITED STATES NATIONAL AND NOT A UNITED STATES CITIZEN. Id.

    55. The State Department has imprinted Endorsement Code 09 on the U.S. passports

    Case 1:12-cv-01143 Document 1 Filed 07/10/12 Page 20 of 27

    JA27

    USCA Case #13-5272 Document #1490172 Filed: 04/25/2014 Page 29 of 60

  • - 21 -

    of the Individual Plaintiffs.

    56. The Individual Plaintiffs are unable to obtain U.S. passports that are not imprinted

    with Endorsement Code 09 unless they successfully undertake the naturalization process.

    57. Persons born in American Samoa are the only individuals who are issued United

    States passports stating that they are not citizens of the United States.

    The Defendants Refusal to Recognize the U.S. Citizenship of theIndividual Plaintiffs Causes Material Harms

    58. Plaintiffs re-allege and incorporate herein by reference paragraphs 1 through 57.

    59. The Defendants refusal to recognize the Individual Plaintiffs as U.S. citizens by

    virtue of the Citizenship Clause is a deprivation of their constitutional rights and is therefore a

    material injury.

    60. The Defendants classification of the Individual Plaintiffs as non-citizen

    nationals instead of as citizens also imposes material dignitary and emotional harms upon the

    Individual Plaintiffs. The formal legal classification of non-citizen national, which is limited

    to persons born in American Samoa, stigmatizes the Individual Plaintiffs as inferior and

    subordinate to their fellow Americans.

    61. The Defendants classification of the Individual Plaintiffs as non-citizen

    nationals instead of as citizens also imposes economic and legal harms upon the Individual

    Plaintiffs. Because of Defendants actions, the Individual Plaintiffs are denied recognition as

    U.S. citizens by federal, state, and local governments, foreign governments, private employers,

    and other entities. Because the Defendants have classified them as non-citizen nationals, the

    Individual Plaintiffs are required to navigate a confusing patchwork of federal and state laws that

    often treat them less favorably than citizens, and sometimes even less favorably than permanent

    resident aliens. Laws that limit the civil, political, and economic liberties of non-citizen

    Case 1:12-cv-01143 Document 1 Filed 07/10/12 Page 21 of 27

    JA28

    USCA Case #13-5272 Document #1490172 Filed: 04/25/2014 Page 30 of 60

  • - 22 -

    nationals affect the life choices of Individual Plaintiffs, including decisions regarding where to

    live and what careers to pursue. This is particularly true for the minor Plaintiffs, who do not

    have the same opportunities available to them as do children born in other parts of the United

    States.

    62. The laws of many U.S. states deny non-citizen nationals the right to vote in

    federal, state, and local elections, the right to hold public office, and the right to serve on a jury.

    Plaintiffs Fosi and Maene, for example, are unable to exercise these rights because they currently

    reside in the states of Hawaii and Washington, respectively. See, e.g., Haw. Const. art. II, 1

    (right to vote); Wash. Const. art. III, 25 (right to hold office); Wash. Rev. Code 2.36.070

    (right to serve as juror).

    63. State and federal laws also limit the employment opportunities of non-citizen

    nationals. Many states and municipalities have citizenship requirements for law enforcement

    officers, firefighters, and other public service positions. See, e.g., Cal. Gov. Code 1031 (public

    safety officers); Wash. Rev. Code 41.08.060 & 41.08.070 (firefighters and civil service);

    Haw. Rev. Stat. 121-14 (Hawaii National Guard officers); 24 Pa. Stat. 11-1109 (public

    school teachers). At the federal level, citizenship is required for service as an officer in the U.S.

    Armed Forces and the U.S. Special Forces. These and other employment restrictions limit the

    career opportunities for Individual Plaintiffs. For example, as stated in Paragraph 13(c) above,

    Plaintiff Maene recently lost her job as a Licensing Services Representative at the Washington

    State Department of Licensing because the United States classifies her as a non-citizen

    national. Similarly, as stated in Paragraph 10(c) above, when Plaintiff Tuaua resided in

    California, he was ineligible to apply for law enforcement positions despite having performed

    well on qualifying tests.

    Case 1:12-cv-01143 Document 1 Filed 07/10/12 Page 22 of 27

    JA29

    USCA Case #13-5272 Document #1490172 Filed: 04/25/2014 Page 31 of 60

  • - 23 -

    64. Non-citizen nationals are treated less favorably than citizens when it comes to

    sponsoring foreign-national relatives for immigration visas because non-citizen nationals are

    generally considered equivalent to lawful permanent residents for purposes of immigration

    preference. As relevant here, USCIS permits U.S. citizens to sponsor foreign national spouses,

    parents, and siblings to obtain an immigration visa, and there is no waiting requirement for a

    U.S. citizens spouse or parent after the immigration visa application has been approved. In

    contrast, non-citizen nationals may only sponsor spouses, but not parents or siblings.

    Moreover, the spouses of non-citizen nationals cannot receive a visa, even after their

    immigration application has been approved, until they reach their immigration priority date;

    according to the June 2012 Visa Bulletin, the current wait is more than two years. These

    restrictions have burdened Individual Plaintiffs whose immediate family members are foreign

    nationals. For example, Plaintiff Maene, as stated in Paragraph 13(e) above, is unable to sponsor

    her foreign-national mother to obtain an immigration visa. And although Plaintiff Mamea, as

    stated in Paragraph 12(e) above, may sponsor his foreign-national wife, she would likely have to

    wait several years to receive an immigration visa.

    65. The laws of some U.S. states deny non-citizen nationals the right to bear arms.

    For example, as stated in Paragraph 11(e) above, Hawaii law does not permit Plaintiff Fosi to

    obtain or possess a firearm, even though he served as an officer in the Hawaii National Guard

    and U.S. Army Reserve. See Haw. Rev. Stat. 134-2(d).

    66. Non-citizen nationals who travel internationally must rely on U.S. passports

    that expressly state, via Endorsement Code 09, that they are not U.S. citizens. In some cases,

    this creates special burdens; for example, independent Samoa requires that non-citizen

    nationals purchase a special visitors permit that is not required for visiting U.S. citizens. In all

    Case 1:12-cv-01143 Document 1 Filed 07/10/12 Page 23 of 27

    JA30

    USCA Case #13-5272 Document #1490172 Filed: 04/25/2014 Page 32 of 60

  • - 24 -

    cases, Endorsement Code 09 creates uncertainty about how foreign officials will react when

    presented with an anomalous U.S. passport stating that the bearer is not a U.S. citizen. Thus, for

    example, Plaintiff Fosi is deterred from exercising his right to travel abroad because his U.S.

    passport states that he is not a U.S. citizen, and he fears the confusion that Endorsement 09 might

    create for foreign officials.

    CLAIMS FOR RELIEF

    COUNT I

    (INA 308(1) Violates the Fourteenth Amendment)

    67. Plaintiffs re-allege and incorporate herein by reference paragraphs 1 through 66.

    68. By classifying persons born in American Samoa as nationals, but not citizens, of

    the United States, INA 308(1) violates the Fourteenth Amendment, both on its face and as

    applied to the Individual Plaintiffs through the State Departments policy and practice of

    imprinting Endorsement Code 09 in the passports issued to persons born in American Samoa.

    69. Plaintiffs therefore seek entry of a judgment declaring that INA 308(1) violates

    the Fourteenth Amendment on its face and as applied to the Individual Plaintiffs, and enjoining

    Defendants from placing Endorsement Code 09 in the passports of persons born in American

    Samoa.

    COUNT II

    (The State Departments Policy and Practice of Refusing to Recognize the BirthrightCitizenship of Persons Born in American Samoa Violates the Fourteenth Amendment)

    70. Plaintiffs re-allege and incorporate herein by reference paragraphs 1 through 69.

    71. By classifying persons born in American Samoa as nationals, but not citizens, of

    the United States, the State Departments policy that the citizenship provisions of the

    Constitution do not apply to persons born [in American Samoa], as reflected in 7 FAM

    Case 1:12-cv-01143 Document 1 Filed 07/10/12 Page 24 of 27

    JA31

    USCA Case #13-5272 Document #1490172 Filed: 04/25/2014 Page 33 of 60

  • - 25 -

    1125.1(b) and (d), violates the Fourteenth Amendment, both on its face and as applied through

    the Departments policy and practice of imprinting Endorsement Code 09 in passports issued to

    persons born in American Samoa.

    72. Plaintiffs therefore seek entry of a judgment declaring that the State Departments

    policy, as reflected in 7 FAM 1125.1(b) and (d), violates the Fourteenth Amendment on its

    face and as applied to the Individual Plaintiffs, and enjoining Defendants from placing

    Endorsement Code 09 in the passports of persons born in American Samoa.

    COUNT III

    (The State Departments Practice of Placing Endorsement Code 09 in the Passports ofPersons Born in American Samoa Violates the Administrative Procedure Act)

    73. Plaintiffs re-allege and incorporate herein by reference paragraphs 1 through 72.

    74. The State Departments policy and practice of imprinting Endorsement Code 09

    in the passports of persons born in American Samoa, including the Individual Plaintiffs, is

    contrary to constitutional right and is arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or

    otherwise not in accordance with law. 5 U.S.C. 706(2)(A), (B).

    75. Plaintiffs seek entry of a judgment declaring Defendants practice of imprinting

    Endorsement Code 09 in the passports of persons born in American Samoa to be in violation of

    the Administrative Procedure Act, enjoining Defendants from placing Endorsement Code 09 in

    the passports of persons born in American Samoa, and ordering Defendants to issue new

    passports to the Individual Plaintiffs that do not contain Endorsement Code 09 and that do not

    otherwise disclaim that they are citizens of the United States.

    PRAYER FOR RELIEF

    WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs respectfully request that the Court:

    A. Declare that persons born in the U.S. territory of American Samoa are born in

    Case 1:12-cv-01143 Document 1 Filed 07/10/12 Page 25 of 27

    JA32

    USCA Case #13-5272 Document #1490172 Filed: 04/25/2014 Page 34 of 60

  • - 26 -

    the United States for purposes of the Fourteenth Amendments Citizenship

    Clause and are therefore U.S. citizens by birth;

    B. Declare that INA 308(1) violates the Fourteenth Amendment on its face and as

    applied to classify persons born in the U.S. territory of American Samoa as

    nationals, but not citizens, of the United States;

    C. Declare that the State Departments policy as reflected in 7 FAM 1125.1(b) and

    (d) violates the Fourteenth Amendment on its face and as applied to classify

    persons born in the U.S. territory of American Samoa as nationals, but not

    citizens, of the United States;

    D. Declare that the State Departments policy and practice of imprinting

    Endorsement Code 09 in the passports of persons born in American Samoa

    violates the Administrative Procedure Act;

    E. Enter a permanent injunction preventing Defendants from taking any action to

    enforce INA 308(1) or the State Departments policy as reflected in 7 FAM

    1125.1(b) and (d), including through Defendants practice of imprinting

    Endorsement Code 09 in passports issued to persons born in American Samoa;

    F. Order Defendants to issue new passports to the Individual Plaintiffs that do not

    contain Endorsement Code 09 and that do not otherwise disclaim that they are

    citizens of the United States;

    G. Award such costs and reasonable attorneys fees to which the Plaintiffs might be

    entitled by law; and

    H. Award such other relief as this Court may deem just and appropriate.

    Case 1:12-cv-01143 Document 1 Filed 07/10/12 Page 26 of 27

    JA33

    USCA Case #13-5272 Document #1490172 Filed: 04/25/2014 Page 35 of 60

  • Case 1:12-cv-01143 Document 1 Filed 07/10/12 Page 27 of 27

    JA34

    USCA Case #13-5272 Document #1490172 Filed: 04/25/2014 Page 36 of 60

  • EXHIBIT A

    Case 1:12-cv-01143 Document 1-1 Filed 07/10/12 Page 1 of 3

    JA35

    USCA Case #13-5272 Document #1490172 Filed: 04/25/2014 Page 37 of 60

  • RCase 1:12-cv-01143 Document 1-1 Filed 07/10/12 Page 2 of 3

    JA36

    USCA Case #13-5272 Document #1490172 Filed: 04/25/2014 Page 38 of 60

  • SCase 1:12-cv-01143 Document 1-1 Filed 07/10/12 Page 3 of 3

    JA37

    USCA Case #13-5272 Document #1490172 Filed: 04/25/2014 Page 39 of 60

  • JA38

    USCA Case #13-5272 Document #1490172 Filed: 04/25/2014 Page 40 of 60

  • JA39

    USCA Case #13-5272 Document #1490172 Filed: 04/25/2014 Page 41 of 60

  • JA40

    USCA Case #13-5272 Document #1490172 Filed: 04/25/2014 Page 42 of 60

  • JA41

    USCA Case #13-5272 Document #1490172 Filed: 04/25/2014 Page 43 of 60

  • JA42

    USCA Case #13-5272 Document #1490172 Filed: 04/25/2014 Page 44 of 60

  • JA43

    USCA Case #13-5272 Document #1490172 Filed: 04/25/2014 Page 45 of 60

  • JA44

    USCA Case #13-5272 Document #1490172 Filed: 04/25/2014 Page 46 of 60

  • JA45

    USCA Case #13-5272 Document #1490172 Filed: 04/25/2014 Page 47 of 60

  • JA46

    USCA Case #13-5272 Document #1490172 Filed: 04/25/2014 Page 48 of 60

  • JA47

    USCA Case #13-5272 Document #1490172 Filed: 04/25/2014 Page 49 of 60

  • JA48

    USCA Case #13-5272 Document #1490172 Filed: 04/25/2014 Page 50 of 60

  • JA49

    USCA Case #13-5272 Document #1490172 Filed: 04/25/2014 Page 51 of 60

  • JA50

    USCA Case #13-5272 Document #1490172 Filed: 04/25/2014 Page 52 of 60

  • JA51

    USCA Case #13-5272 Document #1490172 Filed: 04/25/2014 Page 53 of 60

  • JA52

    USCA Case #13-5272 Document #1490172 Filed: 04/25/2014 Page 54 of 60

  • JA53

    USCA Case #13-5272 Document #1490172 Filed: 04/25/2014 Page 55 of 60

  • JA54

    USCA Case #13-5272 Document #1490172 Filed: 04/25/2014 Page 56 of 60

  • JA55

    USCA Case #13-5272 Document #1490172 Filed: 04/25/2014 Page 57 of 60

  • IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTFOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

    LENEUOTI F. TUAUA; VAALEAMA T.FOSI; FANUATANU F. L. MAMEA, on hisown behalf and on behalf of his minorchildren, M.F.M., L.C.M., and E.T.M.;TAFFY-LEI T. MAENE; EMY F.AFALAVA; and SAMOAN FEDERATIONOF AMERICA, INC.,

    Plaintiffs,

    v.

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al.,

    Defendants.

    )))))))))))))))))

    Civil Action No. 12-1143-RJL

    NOTICE OF APPEAL

    Notice is hereby respectfully given that all Plaintiffs in the above-captioned case hereby

    appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit from the Order

    (Dkt. No. 25) dated June 26, 2013, with associated Memorandum Opinion (Dkt. No. 24),

    granting Defendants Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 9) Plaintiffs Complaint (Dkt. No. 1). This

    Notice of Appeal is filed within 60 days of the entry of the Order and is therefore timely under

    Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a).

    Case 1:12-cv-01143-RJL Document 26 Filed 08/23/13 Page 1 of 2

    JA56

    USCA Case #13-5272 Document #1490172 Filed: 04/25/2014 Page 58 of 60

  • - 2 -

    Dated: August 23, 2013 Respectfully submitted,

    /s/ Murad Hussain

    Neil C. Weare (D.C. Bar. No. 997220)WE THE PEOPLE PROJECT1421 T Street N.W., Ste. 10Washington, D.C. 20009(202) [email protected]

    Charles Alailima (WA Bar No. 28006;AS Bar Member (unnumbered))

    LAW OFFICE OFCHARLES V. ALAILIMA, PLLCP.O. Box 1118Nuuuli, AS 96799(684) [email protected]

    Robert J. Katerberg (D.C. Bar No. 466325)Murad Hussain (D.C. Bar No. 999278)ARNOLD & PORTER LLP555 12th Street N.W.Washington, D.C. 20004(202) [email protected]@aporter.com

    COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFFS

    Case 1:12-cv-01143-RJL Document 26 Filed 08/23/13 Page 2 of 2

    JA57

    USCA Case #13-5272 Document #1490172 Filed: 04/25/2014 Page 59 of 60

  • CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

    I hereby certify that on April 25, 2014, I electronically filed the foregoing

    Joint Appendix with the Clerk of the Court for the United States Court of Appeals

    for the District of Columbia Circuit via the Courts appellate Case

    Management/Electronic Case Files (CM/ECF) system, causing a true and correct

    copy to be served upon all counsel of record who are registered CM/ECF users.

    Further, I hereby certify that I dispatched seven (7) paper copies to a third-

    party commercial carrier for delivery to the Clerk of the Court for the United States

    Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. In addition, one paper copy

    will be served via third-party commercial carrier on the following party:

    Wynne P. KellyAssistant United States AttorneyJudiciary Center Building555 Fourth Street, N.W.Washington, D.C. 20530(202) 252-2545

    /s/ Murad Hussain

    Murad HussainARNOLD & PORTER LLP555 Twelfth Street, N.W.Washington, D.C. 20004-1206(202) [email protected] for Plaintiffs-Appellants

    USCA Case #13-5272 Document #1490172 Filed: 04/25/2014 Page 60 of 60

    2a - Complaint.pdf