42
Tropospheric parameters from DORIS in comparison to other techniques during CONT campaigns Johannes Böhm (1) , Kamil Teke (1, 2) , Pascal Willis (3, 4) , Tobias Nilsson (1) , Peter Steigenberger (5) (1) Vienna University of Technology, Institute of Geodesy and Geophysics, Vienna, Austria (2) Hacettepe University, Department of Geomatics Engineering, Ankara, Turkey (3) Institut Géographique National, Direction Technique, Saint-Mandé, France (4) Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris, PRES Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France (5) Institut für Astronomische und Physikalische Geodäsie, Technische Universität München, Germany IDS workshop, Venice, Italy, 25-26 September 2012

Tropospheric parameters from DORIS in comparison to other techniques during CONT campaigns Johannes Böhm (1), Kamil Teke (1, 2), Pascal Willis (3, 4),

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Tropospheric parameters from DORIS in comparison to other techniques during CONT campaigns Johannes Böhm (1), Kamil Teke (1, 2), Pascal Willis (3, 4),

Tropospheric parameters from DORIS in comparison to other techniques

during CONT campaigns

Johannes Böhm(1), Kamil Teke(1, 2), Pascal Willis(3, 4), Tobias Nilsson(1), Peter Steigenberger(5)

(1) Vienna University of Technology, Institute of Geodesy and Geophysics, Vienna, Austria (2) Hacettepe University, Department of Geomatics Engineering, Ankara, Turkey (3) Institut Géographique National, Direction Technique, Saint-Mandé, France

(4) Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris, PRES Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France (5) Institut für Astronomische und Physikalische Geodäsie, Technische Universität München, Germany

IDS workshop, Venice, Italy, 25-26 September 2012

Page 2: Tropospheric parameters from DORIS in comparison to other techniques during CONT campaigns Johannes Böhm (1), Kamil Teke (1, 2), Pascal Willis (3, 4),

• Quantify agreement of troposphere estimates• Figure out site and technique specific irregularities

The aims of our study are

Page 3: Tropospheric parameters from DORIS in comparison to other techniques during CONT campaigns Johannes Böhm (1), Kamil Teke (1, 2), Pascal Willis (3, 4),

Very Long Baseline Interferometry

• Group delay determined by correlator

• Ionospheric corrections by S- and X-band observations

• c = bWSNPk0

c

b

k0

Earth orientation parameters (EOP)

Page 4: Tropospheric parameters from DORIS in comparison to other techniques during CONT campaigns Johannes Böhm (1), Kamil Teke (1, 2), Pascal Willis (3, 4),

SG

Troposphere delays

Pressure, temperature, and humidity from numerical weather models

Page 5: Tropospheric parameters from DORIS in comparison to other techniques during CONT campaigns Johannes Böhm (1), Kamil Teke (1, 2), Pascal Willis (3, 4),

Dz

e DL

DL(e) = Dz · m(e) = Dzh · mh(e) + Dzw · mw(e)

+ gradients

Troposphere delays

Page 6: Tropospheric parameters from DORIS in comparison to other techniques during CONT campaigns Johannes Böhm (1), Kamil Teke (1, 2), Pascal Willis (3, 4),

CONT Sessions

CONT02 CONT05

CONT08 CONT11

16-31 October 2002 12-27 September 2005

12-27 August 2008 15-30 September 2011

Page 7: Tropospheric parameters from DORIS in comparison to other techniques during CONT campaigns Johannes Böhm (1), Kamil Teke (1, 2), Pascal Willis (3, 4),

• Vienna VLBI Software (VieVS):- Software VieVS.- Fixed to ICRF2.- NNT/NNR on ITRF2008.- A priori ZHD from surface pressure.- No a priori gradients.- VMF1, above 5°.- Gradient MF: Chen and Herring, 1997.- No elevation-dependent weighting.- Relative constraints for ZTDs are 1.6 cm after 1 hour.- Relative constraints for gradients are 0.12 mm after 6 hours.- 60 minutes for ZTDs, and 360 for gradients.

Very Long Baseline Interferometry (VLBI)

Page 8: Tropospheric parameters from DORIS in comparison to other techniques during CONT campaigns Johannes Böhm (1), Kamil Teke (1, 2), Pascal Willis (3, 4),

Global Positioning System (GPS)• Center for Orbit Determination in Europe (CODE)- Bernese GPS software.- NNR on IGS05.- 120 minutes interval for ZTDs and 24 h for gradients.- VMF1, 3° + elevation-dependent weighting.- No constraints for zenith delays and gradients.

Page 9: Tropospheric parameters from DORIS in comparison to other techniques during CONT campaigns Johannes Böhm (1), Kamil Teke (1, 2), Pascal Willis (3, 4),

Doppler Orbitography and Radio Positioning Integrated by Satellite (DORIS)

• Institut Géographique National (IGN)- Software is GIPSY/Oasis.- TRF is fixed to ign09d02.- VMF1, 10°.- DORIS reset at no regular interval. - It is reset at start of pass and only if the previous reset is 20 minutes

before or earlier. - ZTD epochs interpolated linearly from the irregular epochs to 60

minutes (epochs at UTC integer hours).- No interpolation between the data gaps (no estimates from DORIS

between 6 hours) larger than 360 minutes.- Co-located sites are Ny-Ålesudn (spjb), Kokee Park (kolb), Hartebeesthoek

(hbmb).

Page 10: Tropospheric parameters from DORIS in comparison to other techniques during CONT campaigns Johannes Böhm (1), Kamil Teke (1, 2), Pascal Willis (3, 4),

- Slant wet delays inferred from measurements of the sky

brightness temperature at about 22 GHz and 31 GHz.- ZWDs and gradients obtained by a least-squares fit. 30 minutes

estimation interval for ZWDs and 120 minutes estimation intervals

for troposphere gradients.- ZHDs calculated from surface pressure measurements at the VLBI

antenna.- Cut off 20°.- Data acquired during rain removed.

- Co-located sites: Wettzell, Tsukuba, and Onsala.

Water Vapor Radiometer (WVR)

Page 11: Tropospheric parameters from DORIS in comparison to other techniques during CONT campaigns Johannes Böhm (1), Kamil Teke (1, 2), Pascal Willis (3, 4),

• European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF).

Numerical Weather Model (NWM)

NWM The regions for which

the models provide data

Spatial resolution

Time Resolution

(hours)

Number of levels

at each profile

Troposphere gradients

estimated ?

ECMWF Global 0.25° 6 21 YES

Page 12: Tropospheric parameters from DORIS in comparison to other techniques during CONT campaigns Johannes Böhm (1), Kamil Teke (1, 2), Pascal Willis (3, 4),

Summary of the data used for the comparisonsTechnique Zenith

wet/total delayEstimation

intervalof zenith delay

Estimation intervalof gradients

VLBI-VieVS ZWD, ZTD 1 hour 6 hours (total gradients)

DORIS-IGN ZTD per satellite pass 1 day (total gradients)

GPS-CODE ZTD 1 hour 1 hour (total gradients)

ECMWF ZWD, ZTD 6 hours 6 hours (total gradients)

WVR ZWD 1 hour 6 hours (wet gradients)

Page 13: Tropospheric parameters from DORIS in comparison to other techniques during CONT campaigns Johannes Böhm (1), Kamil Teke (1, 2), Pascal Willis (3, 4),

VLBI antenna reference point

DORIS, SPJB height (53.06 m)

REFERENCE HEIGHT (87.79 m)

Earth

Atmosphere

Δh = 34.73 m

Ny-Ålesund co-located site (Vertical troposphere between antennas)

Troposphere ties calculated based on 6-hourly ECMWF!

Page 14: Tropospheric parameters from DORIS in comparison to other techniques during CONT campaigns Johannes Böhm (1), Kamil Teke (1, 2), Pascal Willis (3, 4),

Total (in red) and hydrostatic (in black) troposphere ties at NY-Ålesund (Δh=35 m)

CONT08 CONT11

Page 15: Tropospheric parameters from DORIS in comparison to other techniques during CONT campaigns Johannes Böhm (1), Kamil Teke (1, 2), Pascal Willis (3, 4),

Total (in red) and hydrostatic (in black) troposphere ties at Hartebeesthoek (Δh=144 m)

CONT08 CONT11

Page 16: Tropospheric parameters from DORIS in comparison to other techniques during CONT campaigns Johannes Böhm (1), Kamil Teke (1, 2), Pascal Willis (3, 4),

Troposphere ZTD of the co-located site Hartebeesthoek during CONT02

Page 17: Tropospheric parameters from DORIS in comparison to other techniques during CONT campaigns Johannes Böhm (1), Kamil Teke (1, 2), Pascal Willis (3, 4),

Troposphere ZTD of the co-located site Hartebeesthoek during CONT05

Page 18: Tropospheric parameters from DORIS in comparison to other techniques during CONT campaigns Johannes Böhm (1), Kamil Teke (1, 2), Pascal Willis (3, 4),

Troposphere ZTD of the co-located site Hartebeesthoek during CONT08

Page 19: Tropospheric parameters from DORIS in comparison to other techniques during CONT campaigns Johannes Böhm (1), Kamil Teke (1, 2), Pascal Willis (3, 4),

Troposphere ZTD of the co-located site Hartebeesthoek during CONT11

Median formal errors at Hartebeesthoek:DORIS: 5.1 mmVLBI: 4.2 mmGNSS: 1.3 mm

Page 20: Tropospheric parameters from DORIS in comparison to other techniques during CONT campaigns Johannes Böhm (1), Kamil Teke (1, 2), Pascal Willis (3, 4),

Troposphere ZTD of the co-located site Kokee during CONT02

Page 21: Tropospheric parameters from DORIS in comparison to other techniques during CONT campaigns Johannes Böhm (1), Kamil Teke (1, 2), Pascal Willis (3, 4),

Troposphere ZTD of the co-located site Kokee during CONT05

Page 22: Tropospheric parameters from DORIS in comparison to other techniques during CONT campaigns Johannes Böhm (1), Kamil Teke (1, 2), Pascal Willis (3, 4),

Troposphere ZTD of the co-located site Kokee during CONT08

Page 23: Tropospheric parameters from DORIS in comparison to other techniques during CONT campaigns Johannes Böhm (1), Kamil Teke (1, 2), Pascal Willis (3, 4),

Troposphere ZTD of the co-located site Kokee during CONT11

Page 24: Tropospheric parameters from DORIS in comparison to other techniques during CONT campaigns Johannes Böhm (1), Kamil Teke (1, 2), Pascal Willis (3, 4),

Troposphere ZTD of the co-located site Ny-Ålesund during CONT02

Page 25: Tropospheric parameters from DORIS in comparison to other techniques during CONT campaigns Johannes Böhm (1), Kamil Teke (1, 2), Pascal Willis (3, 4),

Troposphere ZTD of the co-located site Ny-Ålesund during CONT05

Page 26: Tropospheric parameters from DORIS in comparison to other techniques during CONT campaigns Johannes Böhm (1), Kamil Teke (1, 2), Pascal Willis (3, 4),

Troposphere ZTD of the co-located site Ny-Ålesund during CONT08

Page 27: Tropospheric parameters from DORIS in comparison to other techniques during CONT campaigns Johannes Böhm (1), Kamil Teke (1, 2), Pascal Willis (3, 4),

Troposphere ZTD of the co-located site Ny-Ålesund during CONT11

Page 28: Tropospheric parameters from DORIS in comparison to other techniques during CONT campaigns Johannes Böhm (1), Kamil Teke (1, 2), Pascal Willis (3, 4),

Hartebeesthoek ZTD std. dev. and biases w.r.t. VLBI and GNSS

Page 29: Tropospheric parameters from DORIS in comparison to other techniques during CONT campaigns Johannes Böhm (1), Kamil Teke (1, 2), Pascal Willis (3, 4),

Kokee ZTD std. dev. and biases w.r.t. VLBI and GNSS

37 m

m

41 m

m

Page 30: Tropospheric parameters from DORIS in comparison to other techniques during CONT campaigns Johannes Böhm (1), Kamil Teke (1, 2), Pascal Willis (3, 4),

Ny-Ålesund ZTD std. dev. and biases w.r.t. VLBI and GNSS

Page 31: Tropospheric parameters from DORIS in comparison to other techniques during CONT campaigns Johannes Böhm (1), Kamil Teke (1, 2), Pascal Willis (3, 4),

Troposphere east gradients of the co-located site Ny-Ålesund during CONT11

Median formal errors at Ny-Ålesund :DORIS: 0.15 mmVLBI: 0.20 mmGNSS: 0.09 mm

Page 32: Tropospheric parameters from DORIS in comparison to other techniques during CONT campaigns Johannes Böhm (1), Kamil Teke (1, 2), Pascal Willis (3, 4),

Ny-Ålesund east gradients std. dev. and biases w.r.t. VLBI and GNSS

Page 33: Tropospheric parameters from DORIS in comparison to other techniques during CONT campaigns Johannes Böhm (1), Kamil Teke (1, 2), Pascal Willis (3, 4),

Troposphere north gradients of the co-located site Ny-Ålesund during CONT11

Median formal errors at Ny-Ålesund :DORIS: 0.13 mmVLBI: 0.23 mmGNSS: 0.09 mm

Page 34: Tropospheric parameters from DORIS in comparison to other techniques during CONT campaigns Johannes Böhm (1), Kamil Teke (1, 2), Pascal Willis (3, 4),

Ny-Ålesund north gradients std. dev. and biases w.r.t. VLBI and GNSSS

Page 35: Tropospheric parameters from DORIS in comparison to other techniques during CONT campaigns Johannes Böhm (1), Kamil Teke (1, 2), Pascal Willis (3, 4),

Troposphere east gradients of the co-located site Kokee during CONT11

Page 36: Tropospheric parameters from DORIS in comparison to other techniques during CONT campaigns Johannes Böhm (1), Kamil Teke (1, 2), Pascal Willis (3, 4),

Troposphere north gradients of the co-located site Kokee during CONT11

Page 37: Tropospheric parameters from DORIS in comparison to other techniques during CONT campaigns Johannes Böhm (1), Kamil Teke (1, 2), Pascal Willis (3, 4),

Troposphere east gradients of the co-located site Hartebeesthoek during CONT11

Page 38: Tropospheric parameters from DORIS in comparison to other techniques during CONT campaigns Johannes Böhm (1), Kamil Teke (1, 2), Pascal Willis (3, 4),

Troposphere north gradients of the co-located site Hartebeesthoek during CONT11

Page 39: Tropospheric parameters from DORIS in comparison to other techniques during CONT campaigns Johannes Böhm (1), Kamil Teke (1, 2), Pascal Willis (3, 4),

ZTD mean std. dev. and biases w.r.t. VLBI during CONT11

Total number of common epochs with VLBI during CONT11

GNSS: 3193DORIS: 1095ECMWF: 644CReSS: 114

Page 40: Tropospheric parameters from DORIS in comparison to other techniques during CONT campaigns Johannes Böhm (1), Kamil Teke (1, 2), Pascal Willis (3, 4),

ZTD mean std. dev. and biases w.r.t. VLBI during CONT02, 05, 08, and 11

21.3

mm

20.6

mm

HBKB : 40KOLB : 87SPJB : 243total: 370

Number of common epochs with VLBI during CONT05

HBMB : 254KOLB : 278BADB : 282 SPJB : 281

total: 1095

CONT11

HBMB : 171KOLB : 152 SPJB : 238total: 561

CONT08

HBKB : 202KOKA : 200 SPIB : 296total: 698

CONT02

Page 41: Tropospheric parameters from DORIS in comparison to other techniques during CONT campaigns Johannes Böhm (1), Kamil Teke (1, 2), Pascal Willis (3, 4),

Conclusions

Page 42: Tropospheric parameters from DORIS in comparison to other techniques during CONT campaigns Johannes Böhm (1), Kamil Teke (1, 2), Pascal Willis (3, 4),

Thanks for your attention.