65
Triple Impact FIPs improving fisheries’ social, economic and enviro performance SEAFOOD EXPO NORTH AMERICA 2019

Triple Impact FIPs - seafoodexpo.com · Why triple impact FIPs? Sustainable fishing means leaving enough fish in the ocean, respecting habitats and ensuring people who depend on fishing

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Triple Impact

FIPsimproving fisheries’ social,

economic and enviro

performanceSEAFOOD EXPO NORTH AMERICA 2019

Agenda: Triple Impact

FIPs

Social dimension ……………………..Elena Finkbeiner, CI Oceans

Financial dimension ………………….Neel Inamdar, Wilderness

Markets

Triple impact in action ………………Cecilia Blasco, SmartFish AC

Rationale and Implementation ………Hoyt Peckham, Ocean

Outcomes

Counterpoint…………………………Guy Dean, Albion Fisheries

Why triple impact FIPs?

Why triple impact FIPs?

Sustainable fishing means leaving enough fish in the

ocean, respecting habitats and ensuring people who

depend on fishing can maintain their livelihoods.

Charter (draft)

OUR GOAL

…by 2030, the majority of globally

traded seafood is environmentally

sustainable and socially responsible…

Guidelines for Supporting

Fishery Improvement Projects

We encourage FIPs to examine the full range of

social issues that may exist in their fisheries...

2019 update (draft)

Guidelines for Supporting

Fishery Improvement Projects

2019 update (draft)

Enviro-Socio

We encourage FIPs to examine the full range of

social issues that may exist in their fisheries...

FIP enviro

performance

Planet

Why triple impact FIPs?

FIP enviro

performanceFIP social performance

Planet People

Why triple impact FIPs?

Why incorporate financial into socio-enviro

FIPs?’

Why incorporate financial into socio-enviro

FIPs?Distribution of costs and benefits of

improvement

• costs forced down supply chains

• Benefits retained by buyers

→ livelihoods eroded/erased?

Sampson et al 2015,

Blomquist et al 2015,

Stemle et al 2016,

Wilderness Markets

2018

Etc…

Why incorporate financial into socio-enviro

FIPs?• FIPs proliferating

• 68% in developing countries (CEA FIP database – M. Levine)

• … where fishing livelihoods are crucial and

irreplaceable

Why incorporate financial into socio-enviro

FIPs?

“First, do no harm. Then go nuts”…with your FIPs

Pathway to implementing triple impact FIPs

Triple Impact FIP Working Group

La Paz, México – 16-18 October 2018

Agenda: Triple Impact

FIPs

Social dimension ……………………..Elena Finkbeiner, CI Oceans

Financial dimension ………………….Neel Inamdar, Wilderness

Markets

Triple impact in action ………………Cecilia Blasco, SmartFish AC

Rationale and Implementation ………Hoyt Peckham, Ocean

Outcomes

Counterpoint…………………………Guy Dean, Albion Fisheries

T R I P L E I M P A C T F I P S : D R I V I N G C O M M I T M E N T S T O S O C I A L R E S P O N S I B I L I T Y I N T H E S E A F O O D S E C T O R

Seafood & SlaveryM E D I A R E S H A P E S T H E G L O B A L N A R R A T I V E O N S E A F O O D

An uncommon dialogue

K I T T I N G E R E T A L . 2 0 1 7 . C O M M I T T I N G T O S O C I A L L Y R E S P O N S I B L E S E A F O O D . S C I E N C E 3 5 6 : 9 1 2 - 9 1 3

Policy Forum: Committing to

socially responsible seafood

2 JUNE 2017

ISSUE 6341 sciencemag.org SCIENCE

T h e M o n t e r e y F r a m e w o r k :

g l o b a l S T A N D A R D f o r s o c i a l r e s p o n s i b i l i t y

K I T T I N G E R E T A L . 2 0 1 7 . C O M M I T T I N G T O S O C I A L L Y R E S P O N S I B L E S E A F O O D . S C I E N C E 3 5 6 : 9 1 2

Categories of human rights

Economic

Social

Cultural

Civil

Political Indivisible

A P R I L 2 0 1 8 W O R K S H O P T O C O - D E V E L O P

A S O C I A L R E S P O N S I B I L I T Y S C O R E C A R D F O R F I P S I N

S E A T T L E , W A S H I N G T O N

Diagnostic or rapid assessment tool – to assess risk of social issues; to inform the development of a

workplan that includes a social element.

Not a certification – but enumerates existing resources in social responsibility certification, in the

case the FIP wants to proceed towards certification.

Voluntary – for the time being. A FIP implementer decides whether or not she/he would like to

assess social responsibility principles.

Now reflected in the Conservation Alliance Common Vision.

Was co-produced, and thus co-owned – by many stakeholders and organizations inside and outside

of the Conservation Alliance.

P r i n c i p l e s ,

c o m p o n e n t s ,

a n d

p e r f o r m a nc e

i n d i c a t o r s

o f s o c i a l

r e s p o n s i b i l i t y

Principle Component PI Performance Indicator

1

Protect human rights,

dignity and access to

resources

1.1

Human and labor

rights

1.1.1 Abuse and harassmenta,b

1.1.2 Human trafficking and forced labora Debt bondageb

1.1.3 Child labora,b

1.1.4 Freedom of association and collective bargaininga,b

1.1.5 Earnings and benefitsa

1.1.6 Working hoursa

1.1.7 Access to basic servicesa

1.1.8 Occupational safetya,b

1.1.9 Medical responsea,b

1.2

Access Rights

1.2.1 Customary resource use rightsa,b

1.2.2 Corporate responsibility and transparencya,b

2

Ensure equality and

equitable opportunity to

benefit

2.1

Equality

2.1.1 Grievance reporting and access to remedya,b

2.1.2 Stakeholder participation and collaborative managementa,b

2.2

Equity

2.2.1 Equitable opportunity to benefita,b

2.2.2 Discriminationa,b

3

Improve food, nutrition, and

livelihood security

3.1

Food and

nutrition security

3.1.1 Food and nutrition securityb

3.1.2 Healthcareb

3.1.3 Educationb

3.2

Livelihood

security

3.2.1 Benefits to and within communityb

3.2.2 Economic value retentiona,b

3.2.3 Long term profitability and future workforcea,b

3.2.4 Economic flexibility and autonomyb

3.2.5 Livelihood securityb

3.2.6 Fuel resource efficiencya,b

1 . 1 . 7 . A AC C E S S T O B A S I C S E R V I C E S

( F O R L I V E - A B O A R D V E S S E L S / WO R K E R H O U S I N G )Red: High Risk (<60)

• There are no reliable or transparent data available on access to basic services,OR• Housing or sleeping quarters do not meet basic standards for space, comfort, safety, or cleanliness,OR• Sanitary facilities (appropriate to vessel size) with adequate privacy are not provided,OR• Potable water is not accessible to workers,OR• Adequate food is not provided, or food provided is unsanitary.

Yellow: Med Risk (60-79)

• There are reliable and transparent data available on access to basic services,AND• Housing and sleeping quarters have adequate fire prevention and air ventilation, meet legal requirements, and meet reasonable levels of safety, decency, hygiene, and comfort,AND• Sanitary facilities (appropriate to vessel size) with adequate privacy are provided,AND• Potable water is accessible to workers,AND• Workers/fishers living on site or on board have access to adequate and sanitary food at fair prices.

Green: Low Risk (80+)

• There are separate sanitary facilities for men and women, or sanitary facilities can be locked from the inside,AND• There are separate sleeping quarters for men and women, or if there is one sleeping space, men and women have separate bunks, or share same bunk during different shifts,AND• Sleeping quarters or sanitation facilities cannot be locked from the outside (restriction of movement is prevented),AND• Workers’/fishers’ representatives and management meet regularly to discuss vessel or housing improvements,AND• The workplace/fishery/farm provides childcare.

Investment

Risk Management

Alignment with Global Standards

Meet Stakeholder Expectations

Long Term Sustainability of Product

Value add for Businesses

Photo

by:

Maart

en v

an d

en H

euvel

Ph

oto

by:

Etie

nn

e B

ou

lan

ger

“A fishery is the sum of the aspirations and labors

of a community and a people.”

– Chef Barton Seaver

SOCIAL

ECONOMIC

ECOLOGICAL

Agenda: Triple Impact

FIPs

Social dimension ……………………..Elena Finkbeiner, CI Oceans

Financial dimension ………………….Neel Inamdar, Wilderness

Markets

Triple impact in action ………………Cecilia Blasco, SmartFish AC

Rationale and Implementation ………Hoyt Peckham, Ocean

Outcomes

Counterpoint…………………………Guy Dean, Albion Fisheries

Developing Triple

Impact FIPsThe Sustainable Finance Perspective

Sustainable Finance

Impact Finance

Conservation Finance

Blue Finance

• Sustainable Seafood

Assessment Tools

• Contextual

– Fishery Performance Indicators (FPIs)

• Environmental

– MSC

– O2/SFP/WWF Rapid Assessment Methodology

• Social

– CI social sustainability scorecard

– FAO Voluntary Guidelines

• Financial

– Wilderness Markets for World Bank

– Smartfish Business Performance Metrics

Questions and Tools

• Who benefits?

• How do they benefit?

• What are the determining factors?

• What is the philanthropic exit strategy?

• Defining financial viability

• Using value chain assessments

• Using market information and market strategies

Four Main Risks

• 1. Lack of reliable fishery data (EM)

• 2. Ineffective fisheries management (EM)

• 3. Unreliable infrastructure (US / EM)

• 4. Paucity of investment-ready enterprises (US / EM)

California

• The catch for 2015 was 26.3M lb

• The total quota is 140.4M lbs

• Quota can replace all of the white fish west of the Mississippi

….including Tilapia, farmed Asian Fish, Alaskan Cod and Pollock, and Filet’ of Fish sandwiches.

The West Coast Groundfish Fishery

Risk Diminishers

• Due diligence of a fishery & investable entities

• Role & capacity of small scale fishers in the

supply chain

• Establish a baseline for future interventions

Contextual analysis vs Business analysis

1. Fishery status

2. Management system

3. Governance and policy framework

4. Organizational capacity

5. Market potential

6. Stakeholder engagement

7. Investable entities

1. Legally recognized

2. Experienced management

3. Profitable operations

4. Financial plan & models

5. Operational plan

6. Measurable and meaningful

local impacts

7. Clear opportunities to

create value

8. Meaningful local

engagement

9. Recognized fishing leaders

Contextual Analysis Entity Analysis

Example Question Topics

1. Supply chain relationships

2. Accounting systems

3. Sales forecasting

4. 3+ profitability

5. Revenue model

6. History of fundraising

1. Ice quality

2. Product preservation

3. Quantity of ice on-board

4. Condition of ice storage on-

board

Operational Capacity:

Financial AnalysisOrganizational Capacity:

Cold Chain

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Ownership,Governance and

Management

ProductDevelopment &

Marketing Capacity

Financial Analysis

Social Conditions

Enterprise 1 Enterprise 2 Coop 1 Coop 2

Organizational Capacity: Management, Marketing, Financial

Analysis and Social Conditions

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Catchfeatures

Cold chain

Infrastructureand

equipment

Processing &Production

Management

Productsupply

Commercialmanagement

Demand andactual

commercialisation

Enterprise 1 Enterprise 2 Coop 1 Coop 2

Operational Capacity: Production, Processing,

Commercialization, and Markets

THANK YOU

Agenda: Triple Impact

FIPs

Social dimension ……………………..Elena Finkbeiner, CI Oceans

Financial dimension ………………….Neel Inamdar, Wilderness

Markets

Triple impact in action ………………Cecilia Blasco, SmartFish AC

Rationale and Implementation ………Hoyt Peckham, Ocean

Outcomes

Counterpoint…………………………Guy Dean, Albion Fisheries

TRIPLE IMPACT ON THE GROUND

Cecilia Blasco

[email protected]

SENA

March 17th, 2019

To generate supply, we incubate

artisanal fisher cooperatives to

optimize their fishing, handling,

processing and commercial

capacities, thereby rescuing the

value of their landings

MISSION

To foster a market for environmentally sustainable

and socially responsible seafood in Mexico

To generate demand, we engage

corporate buyers to help source

seafood that is independently

verified as responsible

SCOPINGInitial

exploration of a fishery.

Measure Value Rescue Index(USD 4,500)

VALUE RESCUE Capacity building,

processing, traceability,

commercial pilot

DIAGNOSTICDetailed review of

records and practices to design

Value Rescue proposal

(USD 4,500)

Value Rescue Process

APPROPRIATIONDifferentiated

product in market; benefits

to coop.

Value Rescue Index

1. Environmental

performance

2. Social

performance

3. Production

30%

60%

36%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Stock

Governance

82%

67%

34%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Responsability

Internal organization

Services & rights

44%

51%

39%

51%

53%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Capture & handling

Current processing

Production mgnt

70%

50%

52%

0%

32%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Entrep. CapacityTarjet product

Current marketProfitablity

Product availabity

Example of scoring

1. Environmental impact

• Partnership with environmental NGOs

• SmartFish’s role is to foster market

incentives for bottom-up FIPS

1. Social impact

• Capacity building

• Job creation

• Greater internal transparency

1. Financial impact

• Improve efficiency

• Improve quality

• Access new market segments

Value Rescue Model

Value Rescue Support and Training

FISHING

PRACTICES

ON-BOARD

AND POST-

CAPTURE

PRACTICES

HACCP

PLANS

COLD CHAIN

PROCESSING

LOGISTICS AND

MARKET

ACCESS

TRACEABILITY BUISNESS

CONSULTING

Case study: Natividad Island

Yellowtail 2014-2018

*Raising environmental score further requires regional level data for a stock assessment that is beyond the purview of the coop

*

Natividad Island Yellowtail 2014-2018

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Buildings

Water and ice

Bait quality

Cleanliness anddisinfection

Chemicals

Pest control

Health protocols

Product managment

Marine saftey*

Quality fresh fish*

Changes in Handling Practices

2018 2014

Natividad Island Yellowtail 2014-2018

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Buildings

Water and ice

Bait quality

Cleanliness anddisinfection

Chemicals

Pest control

Health protocols

Product managment

Marine saftey*

Quality fresh fish*

Changes in Handling Practices

2018 2014

Case Study: Natividad Island

Yellowtail 2014-2018

Added Value to the Cooperative

In order to increase

probability of success:

1. Understand social, environmental

and financial aspects in order to

design an appropriate intervention

2. Foster capacity of fisher groups to

collectively reach agreements and

enforce decisions

3. Intentionally develop capacities to

improve market access

4. Sustainability in a small-scale fishery

context can't exist unless you

consider livelihoods

Thank you!

Thanks to our donors:

Cecilia Blasco, Executive Director

[email protected]

Agenda: Triple Impact

FIPs

Social dimension ……………………..Elena Finkbeiner, CI Oceans

Financial dimension ………………….Neel Inamdar, Wilderness

Markets

Triple impact in action ………………Cecilia Blasco, SmartFish AC

Rationale and Implementation ………Hoyt Peckham, Ocean

Outcomes

Counterpoint…………………………Guy Dean, Albion Fisheries

Pathway to implementing triple impact FIPs

Harmonize evaluation tools

• Enviro RAM – OSMI tool by O2, SFP and WWF

• Social scorecard – CI and many partners

• Financial RAM – Wilderness Markets, SmartFish,

and ?

Integrate evaluation tools

• Organize into Triple Impact Evaluation Framework

• Circulate for external review

• Pilots

FIP enviro

performanceFIP social performance

Planet People

Pathway to implementing triple impact FIPs

FIP financial

performance

Prosperity

Agenda: Triple Impact

FIPs

Social dimension ……………………..Elena Finkbeiner, CI Oceans

Financial dimension ………………….Neel Inamdar, Wilderness

Markets

Triple impact in action ………………Cecilia Blasco, SmartFish AC

Rationale and Implementation ………Hoyt Peckham, Ocean

Outcomes

Counterpoint…………………………Guy Dean, Albion Fisheries

Triple Impact FIPs

Elena Finkbeiner, CI

Oceans…………[email protected]

Neel Inamdar, Wilderness Markets

[email protected]

Cecilia Blasco, SmartFish AC…………[email protected]

Hoyt Peckham, O2…………………[email protected]

Guy Dean, Albion Fisheries…………[email protected]

Pathway to implementing triple impact FIPs