Tri Dewi Virgiyanti

Deputy Director For Environmental Pollution And Degradation Control Ministry of Planning (BAPPENAS)

Indonesia

Regional Workshop on Nationally Appropriate Mitigation Actions in Asia and the Pacific 18 and 19 March 2014, Bangkok, Thailand

Outline

2

1. Background: Climate Change Policy in Indonesia 2. NAMAs and The national mitigation policy framework

o NAMAs definition o Link with RAN/RAD-GRK

3. Key element of NAMAs Implementation o Basic National Criteria for NAMAs

4. NAMAs Financing 5. Current NAMAs Development

Example of Municipal solid waste NAMA (V-NAMA)

3

CLIMATE CHANGE POLICY: Toward Low Carbon Development

MoE Decree 15/2013, MRV

Indonesian NAMAs Framework

33 RAD-GRK, Gov.Regulation

Report on MER of RAD-GRK of 26 Province

2014 2020

Medium Term National Development Plan (RPJMN) 2010 - 2014 1 Bureaucracy Reformation

2 Education

3 Health 4 Poverty Alleviation 5

6 Infrastructure 7 Investment and Business

8 Energy

9 Environment and Disaster Management

10 Underdeveloped region, and Post Conflict

11 Culture, Creativity and Technology Innovation

12

13

14

Food Security

1. Mainstreaming Sustainable Development

2. Cross sectoral program: Climate Finance

1. Presidential Regulation 61/2011, RAN GRK

2. Presidential Regulation 71/2011 , GHG Inventory

33 RAD-GRK with 33 Government Regulation

Government Work Plan (RKP)

2010 RKP 2011 RKP 2012 RKP 2013 RKP 2014

Economic Improvement and people’s welfare

Fostering the economic growth with support from the strong government and synergy between local and national government.

Fostering and increase the impact of economic growth to improve the people welfare inclusively and equally.

Strengthen the domestic economic to improve and increase the people’s welfare

Strengthen the national economic to improve people’s welfare inclusively and equally

Politics, Legislation and Security

People’s Welfare

Economic

4

• Monitoring, Evaluation, and Reporting (MER)

• Training/ Capacity Building

• RAD-GRK report of 26 Provinces

• MoE Decree 15/2013, MRV

• Indonesian NAMA Framework

5

• Indonesia NAMAs – The Indonesia NAMAs are built on the National

Action Plan for the Reduction of GHG Emissions (RAN-GRK).

– It takes a level higher in terms of implementation, and be submitted to UNFCCC as the final package of mitigation actions outlining how Indonesia aims at making a difference globally.

2. NAMAs and The National Mitigation Policy

Framework

2. NAMAs and The National Mitigation Policy

Framework

6

3. Key Elements of NAMAs Implementation

7

Basic National Criteria for NAMAs 1. NAMAs should be built upon the national mitigation policy framework:

national development priorities + national mitigation targets, complement the existing sectoral policies and programs.

2. NAMAs should result in development benefit (social, economic, and environmental aspects) and the co-benefit (emission reduction).

3. NAMAs should highlight: aspect of transformational change, likelihood of successful Implementation, and foresee long-term impacts.

4. NAMAs should estimate the direct and indirect GHG mitigation potentials, and demonstrate cost-effectiveness.

4. NAMAs Financing

8

a. Domestic Public Financing

The 2012 government budget has allocated USD 1.59b to implement RAN-GRK. This consists of

regular government spending in the central and local governments (USD 1.07b), investment

financing (USD 0.4b), and tax subsidies for geothermal and bio-fuels (USD 0.12b) (MoF 2012)

b. International Public Financing

Foreign donors can finance NAMAs by channeling the funds to the Ministry of Finance (MoF)

(traditional bilateral/multilateral mechanism) or to the Indonesia Climate Change Trust Fund

(ICCTF). Foreign donors can be in form of loan (for energy infrastructure) and have go through

MoF. Foreign donors in form of grant is encouraged to be put in ICCTF although it can also go

through traditional bilateral/multilateral mechanism. The ICCTF is a nationally managed trust fund

established by the GoI to link international financial resources with national investment strategies.

c. Private Financing

Involvement of private sector to finance NAMA, despite hugh investment potential (2011-

2012: investment deals worth close to USD 900 mio), it is hard to assess how much can be

tapped for green investment.

9

Register at UNFCCC

Indo SUTRI (MoT - BMU)

Proposals submitted to NAMAs Support Facility

V-NAMAs (Bappenas-PU-GIZ) Street Lighting NAMAs (MEMR-GIZ)

RE-NAMAs: Biomass (MEMR-GIZ)

NAMA SUTRI (BAPPENAS/MOT-GIZ)

New NAMAs Proposal

RE-NAMAs: hydro (MEMR-ECN)

Wood to Energy NAMAs (MoFor-ICCTF) Jakarta (transport-industry) NAMAs (UKP4-UNDP) Air Transport NAMAs (MoT-ICAO-GIZ) Bio-Energy NAMAs (MEMR)

Cement NAMAs (MoI – GIZ)

5. Current NAMAs Development

5. Current NAMAs Development (cont.)

10

Initiative local NAMA

Land-based Kalimantan (BMU) Central Java (BMU) Papua (DANIDA) South Sumatera (DANIDA)

11

Example of Current Development of NAMAs Initiatives in Indonesia: V-NAMA in municipal solid waste

management

V-NAMA Project in Indonesia

Purpose Develop the vertically integrated approach in the climate change mitigation action in Indonesia

Focus Focus on the waste sector (urban solid waste)

Executing Agency Coordinating Agency is Bappenas

Partners Ministry of Public Works, Ministry of Environment, Ministry of Home Affairs, Provincial Government and Local Government (Kabupaten/Kota) and other related stakeholders in waste sector

Technical Support GIZ, on behalf of the BMUB (German Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation, Building and Nuclear Safety)

Output 1. Proposal that meets MRV requirements elaborated for the waste sector and its implementation is being promoted actively by the responsible government bodies.

2. Practical guidelines for the elaboration of vertically integrated NAMAs

Commitment of Local Government Waste Management Profile Public/Private Initiative and Participation Policy Context

CRITERIA

Jambi City

Pekalongan City&Regency

Sidoarjo Regency

Malang City

Kendari City

Pilot Locations

Profile of SWM in Pilot Location

Jambi City Kendari City Malang City Pekalongan

City and Regency

Sidoarjo Regency

Population in 2012

540.258 415.191 (in 2013)

895.338 294.117 – City 842.223-Regency

2.053.470

Average waste generation (per day) in 2012

1486 [m3] 731,58 [m3] 607.,44 [ton] 176 [ton] - City 395 [ton] - Regency

4517 [m3]

Per capita daily waste generation in 2012

2,75 [l] 2,43 [l] 0,68 [kg] 0,71[kg] – City 0,47 [ kg] - Regency

2,22 [l]

Type of landfill

Open dumping Controlled landfill

Controlled landfill

Controlled landfill

Open dumping

14

Current status: NAMA Proposal Preparation

RAN-GRK

Top-down: Construction of the

facilities (in 2013: $60M for 79

cities)

RAD-GRK RAD-GRK RAD-GRK

National level

Province level: coordination

(compilation of city and district activities)

• Overall coordination

• Technical assistance &

capacity building

• construction of facilities

-Bottom-up: provision of land, operation and maintainance, local capacity

Coordination among provinces Common methodology and process

V-NAMA project: entry point to address the climate change issues related to the solid waste management process (part of the RAN-GRK) need of strong collaboration of the three government levels (national, provincial and local) to make process work

V-NAMA in RAD-GRK Context

Thank You

16