30
Treatment of Tuberculosis “Therapeutic Drug Monitoring” 2nd European Advanced Course in Clinical Tuberculosis Dr. JWC Alffenaar, clinical pharmacologist Dept Clinical Pharmacy & Pharmacology University Medical Center Groningen

Treatment of Tuberculosis “Therapeutic Drug Monitoring” · routine screening of antimycobacterial-drug levels in HIV-infected patients with tuberculosis, particularly those with

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    5

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Treatment of Tuberculosis “Therapeutic Drug Monitoring” · routine screening of antimycobacterial-drug levels in HIV-infected patients with tuberculosis, particularly those with

Treatment of Tuberculosis “Therapeutic Drug Monitoring”

2nd European Advanced Course in Clinical Tuberculosis

Dr. JWC Alffenaar, clinical pharmacologist

Dept Clinical Pharmacy & Pharmacology

University Medical Center Groningen

Page 2: Treatment of Tuberculosis “Therapeutic Drug Monitoring” · routine screening of antimycobacterial-drug levels in HIV-infected patients with tuberculosis, particularly those with

Overview

• Background & definitions

• Why & How

• Clinical case presentation

• Tools for TDM

• TDM in programmatic TB treatment

Page 3: Treatment of Tuberculosis “Therapeutic Drug Monitoring” · routine screening of antimycobacterial-drug levels in HIV-infected patients with tuberculosis, particularly those with

Clinical Pharmacokinetics is about all the factors that determine variability in the concentration of the drug in time

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring is about treatment optimization based on the drug concentration and clinical characteristics and condition of the patient

Time post dose

Se

rum

co

nce

ntr

atio

n

MIC

Page 4: Treatment of Tuberculosis “Therapeutic Drug Monitoring” · routine screening of antimycobacterial-drug levels in HIV-infected patients with tuberculosis, particularly those with

Therapeutic Window

Drug concentration

Effe

ct

Toxi

city

Page 6: Treatment of Tuberculosis “Therapeutic Drug Monitoring” · routine screening of antimycobacterial-drug levels in HIV-infected patients with tuberculosis, particularly those with

“1% of tuberculosis patients with perfect adherence would still develop MDR-tuberculosis due to

pharmacokinetic variability alone”

“Low rifampin and isoniazid peak and AUC concentrations preceded all cases of acquired drug

resistance”.

“Poor outcomes were observed in patients with at least 1 drug concentration below the target (OR = 14.14).”

Srivastava JID 2012, Pasipanodya JID 2013

Does drug concentration matter?

Page 7: Treatment of Tuberculosis “Therapeutic Drug Monitoring” · routine screening of antimycobacterial-drug levels in HIV-infected patients with tuberculosis, particularly those with

• Thirteen randomized studies – 1631 rapid acetylators

– 1751 slow acetylators

• Rapid acetylators were more likely than slow acetylators to have: – microbiological failure (RR, 2.0; CI, 1.5–2.7)

– aquired drug resistance (RR, 2.0; CI, 1.1–3.4)

– relapse (RR, 1.3; CI, .9–2.0)

INH concentration related failure

Pasipanodya CID 2012

Higher failure rates were encountered even in

drug regimens comprising >3 antibiotics.

Page 8: Treatment of Tuberculosis “Therapeutic Drug Monitoring” · routine screening of antimycobacterial-drug levels in HIV-infected patients with tuberculosis, particularly those with

How do we optimize treatment using TDM?

Page 9: Treatment of Tuberculosis “Therapeutic Drug Monitoring” · routine screening of antimycobacterial-drug levels in HIV-infected patients with tuberculosis, particularly those with

• Correlation:

– drug concentration and therapeutic response

– drug concentration and toxicity

• Inter and intra patient PK variability

Drug concentration => Effect?

Page 10: Treatment of Tuberculosis “Therapeutic Drug Monitoring” · routine screening of antimycobacterial-drug levels in HIV-infected patients with tuberculosis, particularly those with

Time post dose

Se

rum

co

nce

ntr

atio

n

MIC

PK/PD parameters

Cmax

AUC

AUC/MIC ratio Cmax/MIC ratio T > MIC

0 24h

Absorption / Distribution / Clearance

Cmin

Page 11: Treatment of Tuberculosis “Therapeutic Drug Monitoring” · routine screening of antimycobacterial-drug levels in HIV-infected patients with tuberculosis, particularly those with

• Target AUC/MIC ratio > 100 [1-3]

Moxifloxacin

1 Nuermberger EJCMID 2004, 2 Gumbo JID 2004, 3 Shandil AAC 2003

Ratio 25

Ratio 100

Page 12: Treatment of Tuberculosis “Therapeutic Drug Monitoring” · routine screening of antimycobacterial-drug levels in HIV-infected patients with tuberculosis, particularly those with

Moxifloxacin

Pranger ERJ 2010

• 7-fold diff. in AUC • 8-fold diff in MIC (0.125-1 mg/L) • AUC/MIC ratio: 82 (21–320)

Page 13: Treatment of Tuberculosis “Therapeutic Drug Monitoring” · routine screening of antimycobacterial-drug levels in HIV-infected patients with tuberculosis, particularly those with

Time post dose (h)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30

Moxiflo

xa

cin

co

nce

ntr

atio

n (

mg

/L)

0,0

0,5

1,0

1,5

2,0

2,5

3,0

3,5

day 6

day 54

Moxifloxacin; influence of disease?

• Female, 42 yrs from Indonesia with MDR-TB

– 34kg

– HIV positive

• Routine TDM:

– Day 7 (●)

– After 7 weeks (o)

Page 14: Treatment of Tuberculosis “Therapeutic Drug Monitoring” · routine screening of antimycobacterial-drug levels in HIV-infected patients with tuberculosis, particularly those with

• Male, 27 yrs from Russia

• HIV positive

• DST: normal sensitive

• Standard treatment

– HRZE

• TDM for HIV drugs

– also TB drugs

TB-HIV “RIF”

Page 15: Treatment of Tuberculosis “Therapeutic Drug Monitoring” · routine screening of antimycobacterial-drug levels in HIV-infected patients with tuberculosis, particularly those with

Case (continued)

Page 16: Treatment of Tuberculosis “Therapeutic Drug Monitoring” · routine screening of antimycobacterial-drug levels in HIV-infected patients with tuberculosis, particularly those with

TB-HIV patients N=2:

“In addition to the use of DOT to ensure compliance, we advocate routine screening of antimycobacterial-drug levels in HIV-infected

patients with tuberculosis, particularly those with advanced HIV disease.”

N=287

“We believe this is an important area for continued investigation, particularly correlations of low body weight with both adverse drug

reactions and therapeutic drug levels of MDR-TB treatments.”

Patel et al NEJM 1995; Farley PlosOne 2011

Routine care today?

Page 17: Treatment of Tuberculosis “Therapeutic Drug Monitoring” · routine screening of antimycobacterial-drug levels in HIV-infected patients with tuberculosis, particularly those with

time (hr)

0 2 4 6 8 10 12

Rifam

pic

in c

oncentr

ation (

mg/L

)

0

2

4

6

8

Which blood sample to take from my patient?

Rifampin Peak ≠ C2

Page 18: Treatment of Tuberculosis “Therapeutic Drug Monitoring” · routine screening of antimycobacterial-drug levels in HIV-infected patients with tuberculosis, particularly those with

Methods of blood sampling

• Classical: trough/peak

• Full PK curve

• Optimized: – limited sampling

Time post dose

Seru

m c

once

ntr

ation

MIC

Page 19: Treatment of Tuberculosis “Therapeutic Drug Monitoring” · routine screening of antimycobacterial-drug levels in HIV-infected patients with tuberculosis, particularly those with

Plasma and/or dried blood sample

• Dried blood spot – Convenient sampling – Sample stability – Whole blood instead of plasma – Advanced equipement

• Plasma

– Venous access

– Samples often instable

– ‘Relative simple’ equipement

Page 20: Treatment of Tuberculosis “Therapeutic Drug Monitoring” · routine screening of antimycobacterial-drug levels in HIV-infected patients with tuberculosis, particularly those with

Dried blood spot sampling; clean

Page 21: Treatment of Tuberculosis “Therapeutic Drug Monitoring” · routine screening of antimycobacterial-drug levels in HIV-infected patients with tuberculosis, particularly those with

Dried blood spot sampling; prick

Page 22: Treatment of Tuberculosis “Therapeutic Drug Monitoring” · routine screening of antimycobacterial-drug levels in HIV-infected patients with tuberculosis, particularly those with

Dried blood spot sampling; wipe

Page 23: Treatment of Tuberculosis “Therapeutic Drug Monitoring” · routine screening of antimycobacterial-drug levels in HIV-infected patients with tuberculosis, particularly those with

Dried blood spot; card

Page 24: Treatment of Tuberculosis “Therapeutic Drug Monitoring” · routine screening of antimycobacterial-drug levels in HIV-infected patients with tuberculosis, particularly those with

Dried blood spot sampling; blood

Page 25: Treatment of Tuberculosis “Therapeutic Drug Monitoring” · routine screening of antimycobacterial-drug levels in HIV-infected patients with tuberculosis, particularly those with

Dried blood spot sampling; spot

Page 26: Treatment of Tuberculosis “Therapeutic Drug Monitoring” · routine screening of antimycobacterial-drug levels in HIV-infected patients with tuberculosis, particularly those with

Dried blood spot sampling

Page 27: Treatment of Tuberculosis “Therapeutic Drug Monitoring” · routine screening of antimycobacterial-drug levels in HIV-infected patients with tuberculosis, particularly those with

Dried blood spot cards

Vu et al J Chrom B 2011

Page 28: Treatment of Tuberculosis “Therapeutic Drug Monitoring” · routine screening of antimycobacterial-drug levels in HIV-infected patients with tuberculosis, particularly those with

TDM in programmatic TB treatment

• Populations at risk for low drug exposure

• Patients failing to respond to treatment

• M/XDR-TB

• Use limited sampling strategy

• Use DBS sampling

Page 29: Treatment of Tuberculosis “Therapeutic Drug Monitoring” · routine screening of antimycobacterial-drug levels in HIV-infected patients with tuberculosis, particularly those with

To summarize:

Patient

Characteristics

Protocol for

Programmatic TDM

Drug concentration

(AUC)

Response

to

treatment

WHO treatment

Drug

susceptibility

(MIC)