Upload
cerise
View
41
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Transport Calculations with TranSIESTA. Pablo Ordejón Instituto de Ciencia de Materiales de Barcelona - CSIC, Spain. Jose L . Mozos and Frederico D. Novaes Instituto de Ciencia de Materiales de Barcelona - CSIC, Spain. M. Brandbyge , K. Stokbro and J. Taylor - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Transport Calculations with Transport Calculations with TranSIESTATranSIESTA
Pablo OrdejónPablo OrdejónInstituto de Ciencia de Materiales de Barcelona - CSIC, SpainInstituto de Ciencia de Materiales de Barcelona - CSIC, Spain
M. Brandbyge, K. Stokbro and J. TaylorMikroelectronik Centret - Technical Univ. Denmark
Jose L. Mozos and Frederico D. NovaesInstituto de Ciencia de Materiales de Barcelona - CSIC, Spain
The SIESTA teamE. Anglada, E. Artacho, A. García, J. Gale. J. Junquera, D. Sánchez-Portal, J. M. Soler, ....
OutlineOutline
1. Electronic transport in the nanoscale: Basic theory
2. Modeling: the challenges and our approach:
• The problem at equilibrium (zero voltage)
• Non-equilibrium (finite voltage)
3. Practicalities
11. Electronic Transport in the . Electronic Transport in the Nanoscale: Basic TheoryNanoscale: Basic Theory
• Scattering in nano-scale systems:
– electron-electron interactions
– phonons
– impurities, defects– elastic scattering by the potential of the contact
d
L d m
RLd
• Semiclassical theory breaks down – QM solution needed
• Landauer formulation: Conductance as transmission probability
S. Datta, Electronic transport in mesoscopic systems (Cambridge)
Narrow constriction (meso-Narrow constriction (meso-nanoscopic)nanoscopic)
E
kx
Transversal confinement QUANTIZATION
2mk
)(kE2x
2
mxm
xik
mxe)(yy)(x,
Landauer formulation - no Landauer formulation - no scatteringscattering
bands
ig i),(v)(2eI kkk fd
kΩ12.9h
2eG
2
O
eVδμ
0GG N NVI
bandsbands
h2e2
E
k
BZ)ENV Fbands
(h
2e2
QUANTUM OF CONDUCTANCE
Landauer formulation - Landauer formulation - scatteringscattering
• Transmission probability of an incoming electron at energy :
• Current:
• Perfect conductance (one channel): T=1
εttTrεT †
transmission matrix:
εTεfεfdεh
2eI RL
2
I
eV
h2e
G2
O
inout ψtψ
22. Modeling: . Modeling: The Challenges and Our The Challenges and Our
ApproachApproach
• Model the molecule-electrode system from first principles:
No parameters fitted to the particular system DFT
• Model a molecule coupled to bulk (infinite) electrodes
• Electrons out of equilibrium (do not follow the thermal Fermi occupation)
• Include finite bias voltage/current and determine the potential profile
• Calculate the conductance (quantum transmission through the molecule)
• Determine geometry: Relax the atomic positions to an energy minimum
Restriction: Ballistic Restriction: Ballistic conductionconduction
• Effects not described: inelastic scattering – electron-electron interactions (Coulomb blockade)– phonons (current-induced phonon excitations)
RLd
• Ballistic conduction: consider only the scattering of the incoming electrons by the potential created by the contact
• Two terminal devices (three terminals in progress)
First Principles: DFTFirst Principles: DFT
• Many interacting-electrons problem mapped to a one particle problem in an external effective potential (Hohemberg-Kohn, Kohn-Sham)
• Charge density as basic variable:
• Self-consistency:
• Ground state theory: VXC
XCHpsexteff VVVVV
)]([ρV V effeff r
ρVeff
SSIESTAIESTA
• Self-consistent DFT code (LDA, GGA, LSD)• Pseudopotentials (Kleinman-Bylander)• LCAO approximation:
Basis set: Confined Numerical Atomic Orbitals
Sankey’s “fireballs”
• Order-N methodology (in the calculation and the solution of the DFT Hamiltonian)
http://www.uam.es/siesta
rμφ
Soler, Artacho, Gale, García, Junquera, Ordejón and Sánchez-PortalJ. Phys.: Cond. Matt. 14, 2745 (2002)
TTRANRANSSIESTAIESTA
Brandbyge, Mozos, Ordejón, Taylor and StokbroPhys. Rev. B. 65, 165401 (2002)
Mozos, Ordejón, Brandbyge, Taylor and StokbroNanotechnology 13, 346 (2002)
Implementation of non-equilibrium electronic transport in SIESTA
• Atomistic description (both contact and electrodes)
• Infinite electrodes• Electrons out of equilibrium• Include finite bias and determine the potential profile
• Calculates the conductance (both linear and non-linear) • Forces and geometry
The problem at EquilibriumThe problem at Equilibrium(Zero Bias)(Zero Bias)
Challenge: Coupling the finite contact to infinite electrodes
Solution:
Green’s Functions
iδεG Imπ1
ερ
H-zzG 1
rrr νμμν
FFμν φφμεnερdερ
μνD
Setup (zero Setup (zero bias)bias)
CRL
Contact: • Contains the molecule, and part of the Right and Left electrodes• Sufficiently large to include the screening
1
R
RRRC
CRCCL
LCLL
L
...-V
-VH-ε-V
-VH-ε-V
-VH-ε-V
-V...
1HεεG
Solution in finite system:
( ) = Selfenergies. Can be obtained from the bulk Greens functions
Lopez-Sancho et al. J. Phys. F 14, 1205 (1984)
1
RRRC
CRCCL
LCLL
HV
VHV
VH
G
Σε
ε
Σε
εBB R
CL
Calculations (zero Calculations (zero bias):bias):• Bulk Greens functions and self-energies (unit cell calculation)
• Hamiltonian of the Contact region:
• Solution of GF’s equations (r)
• Landauer-Büttiker: transmission probability:
PBC
SCF
1/2L
1/2R εΣImεGεΣImεt
εttTrεT †
The problem at Non-The problem at Non-EquilibriumEquilibrium(Finite Bias)(Finite Bias)
2 additional problems:
• Non-equilibrium situation: – current flow– two different chemical potentials
• Electrostatic potential with boundary conditions
e-
L
R
CRL
Non-equilibrium formulation:Non-equilibrium formulation:
• Scattering states (from the left)Lippmann-Schwinger Eqs.:
• Non-equilibrium Density Matrix:
oLo
o ψVεGψψ lll
RFRμνLF
Lμνμν μεnερμεnερdεD
μνt
LL
μν δiεGδiεΣImδiεGπ1
ερ
Electrostatic Electrostatic PotentialPotential
AuAu
12 au
Given (r), VH(r) is determined except up to a linear term:
( r): particular solution of Poisson’s equation
a and b: determined imposing BC: the shift V between electrodes
• (r) computed using FFT’s
• Linear term:
brarr HV
+V/2
-V/2
2L
zLV
33. . TranSIESTA PracticalitiesTranSIESTA Practicalities
3 Step process:
1. SIESTA calculation of the bulk electrodes, to get H, , and Self-energies
2. SIESTA calculation for the open system
• reads the electrode data
• builds H from
• solves the open problem using Green’s Functions (TranSIESTA)
• builds new
3. Postprocessing: compute T(E), I, ...
Supercell - PBC
• H, DM fixed to bulk in L and R
• DM computed in C from Green’s functions
• HC, VLC and VCR computed in a supercell approach (with potential ramp)
• B (buffer) does not enter directly in the calculation (only in the SC calc. for VHartree)
1
RRRC
CRCCL
LCLL
HV
VHV
VH
G
Σε
ε
Σε
ε
Contour Contour integrationintegration
Contour Contour IntegrationIntegration
SolutionMethod Transiesta
# GENGF OPTIONS
TS.ComplexContour.Emin -3.0 Ry
TS.ComplexContour.NPoles 6
TS.ComplexContour.NCircle 20
TS.ComplexContour.NLine 3
TS.RealContour.Emin -3.0 Ry
TS.RealContour.Emax 2.d0 Ry
TS.TBT.Npoints 100
# TS OPTIONS
TS.Voltage 1.000000 eV
TS.UseBulkInElectrodes .True.
TS.BufferAtomsLeft 0
TS.BufferAtomsRight 0
# TBT OPTIONS
TS.TBT.Emin -5.5 eV
TS.TBT.Emax +0.5 eV
TS.TBT.NPoints 100
TS.TBT.NEigen 3