Transit Times Volume 1, Number 5

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/14/2019 Transit Times Volume 1, Number 5

    1/5

    Tra n s i t Tim es f) u ACT

    : . . ...New East Bay Transit Plan Ready

    Express Bus Network, New Equipmenl: Are Recommended;Sysi:em 1:0 Cosl: $16,900,000, Will Be Self-supporl:ing

    A comprehensive program to improveand expand transit operations in the EastBay will be submitted to the area's citizens for their approval this November bythe Alameda-Contra Costa Transit District.

    The self-supporting plan, which wasdesigned to pay for itself at a 20-centlocal fare, will cost $16,900,000.

    The plan proposes a network of new express routes, new local lines, the rehabilitation of more than 15 existing routes, andthe purchase of a fleet of new buses ofadvanced design and riding comfort.New Terminals

    Other improvements proposed for thefirst three years of operation includetightening schedules to provide for increased speeds; development of off-streettransit terminals in Oakland, Berkeley,and Richmond, and possibly San Leandro, Hayward, Walnut Creek and Concord; construction of bus transfer stationsat freeway interchanges, and provision ofall-day parking facilities for park-andride patrons at strategic points served bythe proposed express bus lines.

    The extensive program will give newservice to more than 100,000 residents ofthe District not presently served by public transit, and will afford those now usingexisting public transportation greatertravel speeds, convenience, and substantially improved riding comfort.

    District to Reduce Local FaresTo 20 Cents for ACT Operation

    Local fares will be lowered from 25 centsto the former 20-cent level when the Transit District begins operations in the EastBay.Robert K. Barber, president of the District, said the recent fare increase by KeySystem Transit Lines to 25 cents will haveno effect on the proposed rate structure of

    the Transit District. He added:"The studies of our consulting engineersshow conclusively that the District will beable to provide improved and expandedservice at the former 20-cent local fare."Before the District begins actual operation, the Board of Directors will conduct afull review of existing fare structures in order to provide economical transportationto the District's patrons.

    The plan was prepared by De Leuw,Cather & Company, engineering consultants, following several months of studyand consultation with engineering representatives of the cities to be served by theTransit District.

    Charles E. De Leuw, president of theengineering firm, stated in his final reportto the District Board of Directors;

    "Based on present levels of prices,wages, and fares, our studies clearly showthat the transit system will be self-supporting, and that the financing of all capi-

    (Continued on Page 8)

  • 8/14/2019 Transit Times Volume 1, Number 5

    2/5

    ;4n, EdttfJlUatPlight Of

    The recent court decision which ruledthe cities of Richmond and San Pabloare not legally a part of the Transit District places future transportation servicesfor residents of that area in grave jeopardy.By its judgment, the court held thatRichmond and San Pablo were illegallyincluded in the District by the fact thatabsentee ballots for the two cities wereimproperly canvassed following the November, 1956, election that created theDistrict. The Contra Costa County Boardof Supervisors should have counted theabsentee ballots by city instead of byAssembly district, the court in effect ruled- a procedure which may have resultedin keeping Richmond or San Pablo out ofthe District.Reluctantly, the Board of Directors ofthe Transit District acceeded to the superior court decision after determiningthat the interests of the entire District re-

    2

    Transit TimesPublished monthly by theAlameda-Contra Costa Transit DistrictSuite C, Claremont Hotel

    Berkeley-Oakland, CaliforniaTelephone THornwall 5-6610

    Alan l. Bingham, EditorOfficersRobert K_ Barber _ _ _ PresidentWm. J . Bettencourt . . _ Vice President

    John R. Worthington _ . General ManagerRobert E. Nisbet _ . Attorney-SecretaryGeorge M. Taylor . Administrative Officer

    DirectorsRobert K. Barber . Ward IJ. Howard Arnold Ward IIJohn l. McDonnell Ward IIIWm. J . Bettencourt Ward IVPaul E Deadrich _ Ward VRobert M. Copeland Director at largeCla ir W. Mocleod Director at large

    lYlo Citiesquired that no cloud be cast over theforthcoming bond election, as would bethe case if an appeal were taken.

    The net result of this prolonged legalcontest spurred on by self-interestedgroups, has been to deprive citizens ofthe two communities from the ne t benefits that undoubtedly will accrue upon activation of the Transit District. The planof the District is to replace Key Systemand a portion of Western Greyhoundlines with a program of new, expandedand improved local and express serviceswith new equipment.

    It is entirely conceivable as a result ofthe court action, that in the near futureresidents of the two communities may bedeprived of practically all public transportation in tHeir area; Key System, whichnow serves Richmond and San Pablo, isexpected to end its operations when theTransit Dish-ict begins service.We believe the matter should be ofvital concern to each resident, homeowner, civic official and businessmanhaving a stake in the promising futuredevelopment of the two communities; wealso believe a full-scale review of what

    the future holds in store for public transportation in the Richmond area should bethoroughly re-examined by all responsi-ble-thinking citizens.

    East Bay residents established the District two years ago with bu t one primarypurpose in mind-to provide the areawith improved public transportation atreasonable fares . Directors of this Districtwill continue to stand ready to do all intheir power to fulfill this mandate, and tofully assist residents of Richmond andSan Pablo in their future considerationsof how best their area can secure adequate public transportation.

    C ~ A N 6 I N 6 TIMES

    Tests Successful OnSilent, Odorless Buses

    Successful tests are being conducted todeodorize and silence diesel buses.For more than two months, buses inChicago and Philadelphia have experi

    mented with the equipment which takesthe smell and noise out of diesel combustion.In each case when the bus moves awayfrom the curb the surrounding air doesnot appear to become more tainted thanbefore the driver started.What amounts to an atomizer picks upair from a supercharger, routes it througha container of a chemical called Dieseline,and blows vapor into the exhaust stream.The chemical has an affinity for forma ldehyde, the smelly end product of dieselcombustion. Odor thus vanishes. The engine silencing was accomplished by placing a wide acoustic cushion pan underneath the bus . This keeps the soundwaves from bouncing off the pavementand building up noise.

    Equipment: To GiveMore Riding Comfort:

    A fleet of new equipment of latestdesign, styling and riding comfort isplanned for use by the Transit Districtin both its local and express operation.A major portion of the trans bay serviceand the longer East Bay inter-city routeswill be served by a superior design ofdiesel bus that is still on the drawingboard.

    The equipment will include wider anddeeply upholstered seats with arm rests,bright modern interiors, overhead storagespace for bundles, unique rear-slantingwindows for wider panoramic views, andcontrolled overhead reading lamps.

    Other comfort features include airconditioning on buses serving southernAlameda County communities and thosein central Contra Costa 'County, plus asubstantially improved airglide suspension system which insures a smooth rideregardless of road surface conditions.Equipment of local city service willcontain many of the comfort features of

    the intercity buses, including wider seats,special window design to permit maximum outside vision for each passenger,new air suspension, bright interiors, andair-conditioning where applicable.In addition to the 334 new buses, theDistrict proposes to purchase 276 postwar buses owned by Key System, and40 buses used by Western GreyhoundLines.These buses will be completely modernized and refurbished. The inexpensivebu t thorough rehabilitation and colorization program will place these u sed buseson practically the same level of efficiency,comfort and appearance as those presently being built.

    Equipment costs include $7,900,000 fo rthe 334 new buses, and $3 ,700,000 fo r theacquisition of the used vehicles .

    3

  • 8/14/2019 Transit Times Volume 1, Number 5

    3/5

    SAN fRANCISCO BAY

    LE G EN D_ RECOMMENDED EXPRESS ROUTES__ LOCAL LINES RECOMMENDED FOR INCREASED FREQUENCy RECOMMENDED NEW LOCAL LINES

    Maps show new express routes, new localservice, and improvements in existingservice for Oakland-Hayward area, asrecommended by De Leuw, Cather &Company, consulting engineers whichprepared East Bay mass transit plan. Inaddition to Hayward-San Leandro ex-press, new service is proposed in Montclair, San Lorenzo Village, and PalmaCeia Plaza, Schafer Park and TennysonRd. in Hayward area. Improved scheduling and re-routing also are proposed fora number of other lines now operating inOakland - San Leandro - Hayward area.New equipment will be used on all routesincluding transbay service.

    New express routes, betterments in existing service, and new local routes as recommended by consulting engineers, areshown on accompanying map. Brand newequipment of superior design, styling andcomfort will be used on all local, expressand trans bay routes for midday and evening service plus much of the service during morning and evening peak hours. Newlocal routes and extensions of existingroutes provide new or improved servicefor Berkeley, El Cerrito, Richmond, SanPablo, north Richmond and West Campus of the Contra Costa Junior College.However, those engineering recommendations affecting service in Richmondand San Pablo must be held in abeyanceas a result of recent court decision whichruled the two municipalities were not apart of the Transit District.

    5

  • 8/14/2019 Transit Times Volume 1, Number 5

    4/5

    What the EditorsSay About Transit

    Hayward 'Review' Praises NewPlan for Improved Public TransitReprinted from the Hayward DailyReview:A necessary feature of the East Bay'sfuture is outlined in an inch-thick reportreleased last week by the Alameda-Con

    tra Costa Transit District. With word andma p it postulates a system of mass transportation that can relieve a region's dependence on the private automobilewhich has become a crutch tripped by thevery congestion it creates.The report at present is no more than a

    paper plan, awaiting its place on the ballot. Transit district directors are expectedto authorize that action Sept. 16 by calling for a $16,900,000 bond issue. I t willthen be up to voters to transform thecolored lines on the maps into bus routesand realize the promise contained in theprinted text.Although the proposed system wouldbenefit the entire region, its treatment ofthe local area will be of uppermost interest to people here. They will find that itpromises expanded and quicker service.New local lines will serve San LorenzoVillage, Palma Ceia, Schafer Park andTennyson road. Express buses will berouted on the Nimitz freeways from Hayward to Oakland, and through San Leandro on East Fourteenth St.

    I f this is to come into being, votersmust approve the bond issue. Engineerswho have planned the system believe itwill be self sustaining. They have evenpredicted a small net income after expenses.

    We regard those views as possibly too6

    optimistic, bu t bold that the alternativeof continuing with the present inadequateservice is much worse than the prospectof a moderate tax levy should one beneeded to bring the type of service theEast Bay desperately needs.

    I f residents of the two counties are tohave efficient mass transportation necessary for continuing progress, they mustassume the apparently small risk involved. The consistent decline of KeySystem service is a hobble that must beloosened.The transit district directors are to becommended for their application to that

    task. They are fully justified in passingalong the well thought out plan for voterdecision.

    Contra Costa RegionDropped From District

    Directors of the Transit District havevoted to exclude from the District portions of northern Contra Costa Countybecause residents c annot be economicallyserved by District transit operations.The area comprises about 50 squaremiles of sparsely settled ranch land aswell as heavy industrial installationsalong Carquinez Straits.Petitions containing 95 signatures werepresented to the Board requesting theexclusion. John R. Worthington, Districtgeneral manager, advised the Board anannual ope rating deficit of about $50,000would be incurred in providing the area

    with adequate transportation.Another Copy?

    For another copy of Transit Times orto place your name on the mailing list ifyou are not already receiving a copy ofthe monthly newsletter, just drop a line tothe Transit District in Suite C at theClaremont Hotel, Berkeley.

    ORIND AVI LLAG E

    ...r ' ;> u . ; ) I I .. O'

    L EGEND_ HEW O t A L I ' IOuTES__ [XISTlIllCi COHTIPt![HTAL

    TlUILW"Y5 "OUTE

    New service in Walnut Creek-Concord area as recommended by De Leuw, Catherl,- Company, is depicted on above map. Local lines connect maior residential areaswith the principal shopping areas and business centers of Wa lnut Creek and Concord. New lines serve northern and southern portions of Concord, the Ygnacio Valleyand southeastern areas of Walnut Creek, and the area of Pleasant Hill . New suburban equipment providing improved riding comfort and superior styling and designplus air-conditioning, will be used on all existing Western Greyhound routes whichwill be taken over by Transit District. Service recommended for future includes ex-press routes to Orinda, DanVille, Pleasant Hill, Concord, and to Martinez via Pleas-ant Hill Road, as well as additional local service in much of Central Contra Costa.

    7

  • 8/14/2019 Transit Times Volume 1, Number 5

    5/5

    This is the official emblem adopted by the Alameda-Contra Costa Transit District.

    Transit: Plan Ready(Continued from Page 1)tal requirements can be accomplishedwithout the impositon of any additionaltaxes." ' .Provisions of the plan will be placedbefore the voters this November in theform of a financing bond issue. The measure will appear on the ballot as Proposition "B."

    Two new express routes are proposedbetween Berkeley and Richmond andcentral Oakland. Another is recommended between central Oakland andEast Oakland via MacArthur Blvd. Twoothers extend between central Oaklandand San Leandro and Hayward via Nimitz Freeway.

    Transit TimesAlameda-Contra Costa Transit DistrictSuite C, Claremont Hotel

    Berkeley-Oakland, California

    Form 3547 Requested

    Freeway ExpressWith the completion of the GroveShafter and MacArthur freeways, all of

    the express service will be operatedlargely on freeways, including the existing interurban bus routes serving centralContra Costa County.

    New local service is recommendedmainly in the areas of north Richmond,El Sobrante, El Cerrito, Montclair in Oakland, the Hayward area, and in centralContra Costa County including WalnutCreek, Pleasant Hill and Concord.

    The bond amount of $16,900,000 incudes $13,200,000 for new equipment,storage yards maintenance facilities, plus$3,700,000 to purchase a portion of thebuses currently in use by Key System andWestern Greyhound lines.

    BULK RATEU.S. POSTAGEPAID

    Permit No. 288Berkeley, California