Upload
dokhue
View
213
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
126
Priyono et al.
PELITA PERKEBUNAN, Volume 26, Nomer 3, Edisi Desember 2010
Naskah diterima (received): 15 Juni 2010, disetujui (accepted): 17 Juli 2010.
1). Pusat Penelitian Kopi dan Kakao Indonesia , Jl. PB. Sudirman 90, Jember 68118, Indonesia.
2). Nestle R&D Centre, 101 Avenue Gustave Eiffel, 37097 Tours Cedex 2, France.*) Alamat penulis (Corresponding Author) : [email protected]
Pelita Perkebunan 2010, 26(3), 126—141
Transferability of Simple Sequence Repeats and Single NucleotidePolymorphisms Marker for Genetic Map Development in
Coffea canephora Pierre
Kemampuan Transfer Marka Simple Sequence Repeats dan Single NucleotidePolymorphisms Pada Pengembangan Peta Genetik Kopi Robusta
Coffea canephora Pierre
Priyono1*), Michel Rigoreau2) and Dominique Crouzillat2)
Summary
Simple sequence repeats (SSR) and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP)have been developed for some crops. However the studies of transferability ofthis marker for coffee are very limited. These researches were aimed to describethe heterozygosity level of parental clones in Robusta coffee (Coffea canephora)and to evaluate the transferability of SSR and SNP markers for development ofgenetic maps in Robusta coffee. Three parental clones, namely BP 409, BP 961and Q 121 clones were used for evaluation of heterozygosity level. Three popu-lations, namely CPA (BP 961 x Q 121), CPB (BP 409 x Q 121), and CPC (BP409 x BP 961) were used for genetic mapping. SSR and SNP markers selectedfrom reference genetic map were used as molecular markers in this study. Thisresearch showed that the screening of BP 409, BP 961 and Q 121 clones SSRled to, respectively, 52%, 53% and 40%, heterozygosity. A selection of SSRand SNP linkage information in reference map of Robusta coffee allowed us toestablish the homology linkage groups among three cross pollinated (CP) maps,three backcross (BC) maps, and consensus map. Most of the markers mappedfor seven maps showed a very good collinear to references map. This resultsconfirm that SSR and SNP markers have high transferability and mapping infor-mation for Robusta coffee. This work will allow faster and more detailed investi-gations of quantitative trait loci (QTLs) and positioning of a growing number ofcandidate genes co-localized with QTLs.
Ringkasan
Marka simple sequence repeats (SSR) dan single nucleotide polymor-phisms (SNP) telah dikembangan pada beberapa tanaman, namun demikianstudi transfer marka tersebut pada kopi sangat terbatas. Penelitian inidimaksudkan untuk mempelajari tingkat heterozigositas klon dan mengevaluasitingkat transfer marker SSR dan SNP dalam pembuatan peta genetik. Tiga klon,yaitu BP 409, BP 961 dan Q 121 digunakan untuk evaluasi tingkat heterozigositas.Tiga silangan, yaitu CPA (BP 961 x Q 121), CPB (BP 409 x Q 121), dan CPC(BP 409 x BP 961) digunakan untuk pembuatan peta genetik. Marka SSR dan SNPdigunakan sebagai marker molekuler dalam penelitian ini. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan
127
Transferability of SSR and SNP marker for genetic map development in Coffea canephora
PELITA PERKEBUNAN, Volume 26, Nomer 3, Edisi Desember 2010
bahwa dengan menggunakan marka SSR, tingkat heterozigositas kopi Robustaklon BP 409, BP 961 dan Q 121 berturut-turut 52%, 53% dan 40%. Denganmenyeleksi marka SSR dan SNP dari peta genetik referensi dapat dibuat tiga petagenetik persilangan terbuka kopi Robusta, tiga peta genetik tipe silang balik dansatu peta konsensus. Hampir semua marka SSR dan SNP pada tujuh peta genetiktersebut menempati urutan yang sama dengan peta genetik referensi. Hasil inimenunjukkan bahwa marka SSR dan SNP mempunyai tingkat transfer yang tinggipada peta genetik kopi Robusta. Hasil ini memungkinkan digunakan untuk mendeteksiQTL pada kopi Robusta serta melokalisasi posisi gen kandidat yang terpaut denganQTL.
Key words: Coffea canephora, heterozygosity, genetic map, transferable markers, simplesequence repeats, Single nucleotide polymorphisms.
INTRODUCTION
Traditional methods of plant breedinghave made a significant contribution to cropimprovement, such as Robusta coffee butthey are slow in targeting complex traits likeyield, green bean quality, drought or pest-diseases resistance. One of the main con-straints in traditional coffee breeding is thedifficulty to estimate the effect of interac-tions between the genetic and environmentfactors on phenotypic expression. The prob-lem is more complicated on quantitativecharacteristics which are poligenically con-trolled. As a perennial crop, coffee takesseveral years to be properly morphologicalevaluated. It also takes about three to fouryears after planting to produce a generation.Therefore, genetic improvement of coffeemust be continued in order to find out newsuperior planting materials to meet marketdemand. This effort, unfortunately, facesa number of constraints through conven-tional breeding methods due to lack in ge-netic markers to be used in screening andselection tools. Molecular markers wouldmake sure the resource is new, easy andconstitute a contribution for solving the aboveproblems. They allow geneticists and plantbreeders to locate and follow the numer-ous interacting genes that determine a com-plex trait. Genetic linkage maps can provide
a more direct method for selecting desir-able genes via their linkage to easily de-tectable molecular markers (Tanksley,1993).
A linkage map may be seen as a ‘roadmap’ of the chromosomes of a segregat-ing population. Linkage maps indicate theposition and relative genetic distancesbetween markers along the chromosomes.A segregating population is a mixture of geno-types recombining the genetic backgroundsof the parents. The recombinant genotypescan be used to calculate the recombinationfrequencies and the genetic distance betweenmarkers. By analyzing the marker segrega-tion, one can determine distribution and dis-tances between markers. The lower the fre-quency of recombination between two mark-ers, the closer they are on a chromosomeand reciprocally. Furthermore, recombina-tion frequencies can be converted into centiMorgans (Hartl & Jones, 2001).
To meet the great increase in coffeeproduction, biotechnology brings new andpowerful tools to plant breeders. The avai-lability of wide genetic map has become amust for the effective advance of genomicundertaking. To date, there are eight geneticmaps based on coffee genome, comprisingfour genetic maps for C. canephora(Crouzillat, person.comm.; Hendre &
128
Priyono et al.
PELITA PERKEBUNAN, Volume 26, Nomer 3, Edisi Desember 2010
Aggarwal, 2007; Lashermes et al., 2001;Paillard et al., 1996), one genetic map forC. arabica (Pearl et al., 2004), one geneticmap for interspecific F1 (Lopez & Moncada,2006) and two genetic maps for interspecificbackcross population (Coulibaly et al., 2003;Hamon et al., 2005). Recently, Hendreet al. (2008) reported their development ofnew genomic SSR markers from Robustacoffee which showed broad cross-speciestransferability and utility in genetic studies.However no transferable marker used toconstruct different genetic map was reportedfor coffee crop. The generalized use of anincreasingly larger set of transferable markersand consensus mapping information, willallow faster and more detailed investigationof QTLs synteny among species. The purposeof this research is to create the genetic mapof three populations in C. canephora anddevelop the consensus map based on thesethree genetic maps.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Plant material
This study involved three parental clonesnamely BP 409, BP 961, and Q 121. TheBP 409 and BP 961 clones are commercialclones in Indonesia. The mother tree ofQ 121 clone is a variety of Quillouintroduced in 1901 from Libreville, FrenchCongo to Bangelan Plantation (Malang, EastJava, Indonesia). Seeds harvested on twosurviving plants were planted and thenevaluated in this plantation. From this evalu-ation three elite clones were selected. Oneof them is Q 121 (Cramer, 1957). The choiceof these parentals was based on the priorresults of genetic diversity studies as reportedby Priyono (1998). Three controlled hybridpopulations (CP) derived from three parentalclones, namely CPA (Q 121 X BP 961), CPB(Q 121 X BP 409), and CPC (BP 409 X
BP 961) were used to create genetic maps.The numbers of progenies were 77, 93, and87 for CPA, CPB, and CPC, respectively.
SSR and SNP detectiton
The DNA extraction was performedaccording to DNeasy Plant Maxi Proto-col (www.qiagen.com). About 1 g of freshleaves of each individual (Indonesia) wasground in liquid nitrogen and used to ob-tain DNA.
For automation of the SSR detectionon the ABI PRISM® 310 capillary electro-phoresis system (Applied Biosystems), DNAfragments was labelled with specific fluo-rescent dyes. Because labelling all the prim-ers individually would prohibitively increasethe cost of genotyping projects involvingmany SSR markers, an alternative and cost-effective method was used. This techniqueemployed a two-part primer in which a stan-dard ‘tail’ corresponding to a universal M13primer was added to the 5’ end of the for-ward primer sequence. The amplificationof SSR was thus performed with three prim-ers: the forward primer with the M13 tail,the reverse non-tailed primer and thefluorescently labelled M13 primer.
PCR reactions were carried out in a fi-nal volume of 20μl. For normal reaction,PCR amplifications were conducted usingthe following procedure: 10 min 95ºC, fol-lowed by 35 cycles (30 sec 95ºC, 30 sec55ºC, 1 min 72ºC), and 7 min 72ºC. ForM13-labeled reactions, PCR amplificationswere conducted using the following proce-dure: 10 min 95ºC, followed by 30 cycles(30 sec 95ºC, 30 sec 55ºC, 30 sec 72ºC),8 cycles (30 sec 95ºC, 30 sec 5ºC, 30 sec72ºC), and then 7 min 72ºC.
Fluorescent amplification products werethen mixed with de-ionized formamide andan interval size standard (GenescanTM – 500LIZTM Applied Biosystems) in a 1:12:0.5
129
Transferability of SSR and SNP marker for genetic map development in Coffea canephora
PELITA PERKEBUNAN, Volume 26, Nomer 3, Edisi Desember 2010
volume ratio. After 5 min denaturation at95ºC, the amplification products were vi-sualized using an ABI PRISM® 310 GeneticAnalyzer (Applied Biosystems). Fragmentsizes were calculated using GENESCAN andGENOTYPER Software (Applied Bio-sys-tems), where as different alleles are repre-sented by different amplification sizes oftandem repeats.
Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP)are DNA sequence variations that occur whena single nucleotide of the consideredsequence is altered. PCR reactions wereconducted in 20μl (final volume) in a PCRQ7500 with the following sequence: 2 min50ºC, followed by 10 min 94ºC, and thenfollowed by 40 cycles (15 sec 95ºC, 1 min60ºC).
Molecular marker selection and geneticmap construction
Amount of SSR and SNP markers,which showed the segregation type both forF2 and BC to two parental clones for eachpopulation were selected from the 831 mark-ers of reference map of Coffea canephora,(Crouzillat, priv.comm) and supplementarySSR markers obtained from other institutesto construct the studied maps. This refer-ence map has 831 loci covering 1392 cMwith an average distance between two lociof 1.7 cM. The markers used in this refer-ence map were restriction fragments lengthpolymorphisms (RFLPs), SSR and SNPmarkers. However, only PCR-based mark-ers, i.e. SSR and SNP were selected for thepresent study.
Table 1. The origin of markers used to construct the consensus genetic map of Robusta coffee (Coffea canephora)
Tabel 1. Asal-usul marka yang digunakan untuk membuat peta genetik konsensus pada kopi Robusta (Coffea canephora)
Marka origin of consensus genetic map Asal marka pada peta genetik konsensusLinkage group
Kelompok tautanShared markerson the three CPs
Marka sama dari 3 populasi
Total numberof markers on the
consensus genetic map
Jumlah marka padapeta genetik konsensus CPA CPB CPC
A 16 21 15 6 44
B 14 28 9 12 55
C 8 17 9 4 27
D 10 16 4 7 33
E 10 15 7 2 26
F 17 35 6 7 52
G 27 19 2 7 35
H 8 20 5 5 29
I 4 5 4 5 16
J 19 20 5 4 35
K 12 16 5 5 29
Total of markersJumlah marka% to consensus
genetic map% terhadap petagenetik konsensus
135 216 71 64 381
35.4 56.7 18.6 17 100
Notes (Catatan): CPA = BP 961 x Q 121, CPB = BP 409 x Q 121, CPC = BP 409 x BP 961.
130
Priyono et al.
PELITA PERKEBUNAN, Volume 26, Nomer 3, Edisi Desember 2010
A set of polymorphic markers mappablefor each of the cross pollinated (CP) wasselected from the C. canephora referencemap with the following requirements:
a. The markers have to be, as much as pos-sible, shared by the three populations inorder to facilitate the evaluation of mark-ers transferable in the three populations.
b. Markers have to be heterozygous forboth parents for mapping on the twoparental clones in a single run. The pref-erence was given to the markers segre-gating as F2: <ab x cd> or <ab xac>. The markers with <ab x ab> seg-regating ratio were discarded when pos-sible due to a lack of informative capa-bility.
c. Markers were selected according to theirlocation on the core map to reach a dis-tribution of about one marker every 10to 20 cM.
To evaluate the transferable ability ofSSR and SNP markers in genetic mapping,three sets of genetic maps were created:
a. Three “Cross pollinated” (CP) geneticmaps coded as CPA (BP 961 x Q 121),CPB (BP 409 x Q 121) & CPC (BP 409x BP 961) with 78, 93 and 82 progenies.
b. Three backcross (BC) genetic mapscoded as BC BP 409, BC BP 961 and BCQ 121 were developed from the com-mon parents of the three segregatingpopulations. The number of progenies foreach of these BC populations (175, 160& 171, respectively). The common het-erozygous markers segregating in eachparental clone were used to develop thesegenetic maps.
c. One consensus map was created fromthe three CP genetic maps.
All the genetic maps were performedusing JoinMap® software (Ooijen, 2006)with Kosambi’s mapping function (Kosambi,1944) on LOD threshold of 3.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Genetic diversity of the parental clonesused for genetic mapping
A genetic diversity analysis was per-formed on a C. canephora collection in-cluding the three parental clones of thecontrolled hybrid populations (CP). The ge-netic diversity assessment was done usinga set of 13 SSR. The results are shown inFigure 1 and clearly indicate that the twoBP clones are belonging to the Congolesegroup and the Q 121 clone is rather partof the Conilon per Guinean hybrid group.Consequently, the two BP clones sound morerelated to each other than with Q 121 clone.This result is in agreement with previousstudy of genetic diversity using of RFLPmarkers (Priyono, 1998). Consequently, onemay expect more genetic diversity in the:BP 961 X Q 121 (CPA) and BP 409 xQ 121 (CPB) progenies than in the BP 409x BP 961 (CPC) one. Another importantgenetic factor to be considered, at least forthe genetic mapping process, is the heterozy-gosity of the three parents. In this regard,the screening of BP 409, BP 961 and Q 121clones with 757 genomic SSR led to respec-tively 52%, 53% and 40%, heterozygosity.This result suggests that the heterozygos-ity rate observed is sufficient for mappingthe three populations. Interesting to be notedthat the Q 121 clone (Conilon per Guineanhybrid group) is less heterozygous than thetwo BP clones (Congolese group).
131
Transferability of SSR and SNP marker for genetic map development in Coffea canephora
PELITA PERKEBUNAN, Volume 26, Nomer 3, Edisi Desember 2010
Six genetic maps construction
Mapping on multiple populations pro-vides several advantages over mapping basedon a single population. In particular, a largernumber of loci can be placed onto a singlemap. This is especially important when at-tempting to map specific genes of interestthat are unlikely to segregate within a singlemapping population. This also provides forgreater genomic coverage. Therefore, theconstruction of a genetic map is a key stepfor a reliable linkage analysis of importanttraits. Unfortunately, all linkage maps areunique and the product of a given popula-tion and marker set. Even when using thesame set of markers to construct differentlinkage maps, all the markers may not bepolymorphic for different populations andtherefore reliable across the genetic maps.Thus, in order to correlate the information
from one map to another, shared markersare required (Ablett et al., 2003; Flandez-Galvez et al., 2003).
Present result showed that a total of 199markers were selected from the referencemap and then transposed to construct theCPA genetic map. This genetic map covers11 linkage groups corresponding to the 11chromosomes of haploid C. canephora.Among the 199 markers, 50%, 23% and27% markers are respectively segregatingas F2, backcross to BP 409 and backcrossto Q 121. Thus, 145 markers segregate tothe first parental clone (BP 961) and154 to the second parental clone (Q 121)(Table 2). This genetic map is covering 1165cM, about 84% of the reference map length,with an average inter loci distance of6.2 cM.
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
-1,5 -1 -0,5 0 0,5 1 1,5 2
Axis 2
Axis 1
Q121
BP409
Congolese
Conillon
Guinean
BP961
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
-1,5 -1 -0,5 0 0,5 1 1,5 2
Axis 2
Axis 1
Q121
BP409
CongoleseCongolese
ConillonConillon
GuineanGuinean
BP961
Figure 1. The SSR genetic diversity of Robusta coffee (Coffea canephora) using Principal Component Analysis (PCA)among 143 accessions of Robusta coffee including the three parental clones (BP 409, BP 961 and Q 121) used forthe genetic mapping. The first and second axis explained, respectively 29.9% and 7.3% of the variance(Priyono, 2010)
Gambar 1. Keragaman kopi Robusta (Coffea canephora) berdasarkan marka SSR menggunakan uji Principal ComponentAnalysis (PCA). Uji keragaman genetik menggunakan 143 aksesi termasuk tiga klon (BP 409, BP 961 danQ 121) yang digunakan untuk pembuatan peta genetik. Varian untuk sumbu pertama dan sumbu kedua berturut-turut adalah 29,9% dan 7,3%.(Priyono, 2010)
132
Priyono et al.
PELITA PERKEBUNAN, Volume 26, Nomer 3, Edisi Desember 2010
For the CPB genetic map a total of280 markers were selected from the ref-erence map and then transposed to con-struct the genetic map. This genetic mapalso covers of 11 linkage groups. Amongthe 280 markers, 43%, 35% and 22%markers, are segregating respectively asF2, backcross to BP 409 and backcross toQ 121. Thus, amount of 218 markerssegregate to the first parental clone (BP409) and of 181 to the second parentalclone (Q 121) (Table 2). This genetic mapcovers 1320 cM (95% of the referencemap length) with an average distancebetween loci of 4.9 cM.
Only 136 markers were transposed toconstruct the CPC genetic map. This lim-ited number of mappable marker is the con-sequence of the low genetic diversity be-tween the two BP clones and consequentlyled to a huge increase of the number ofdetected linkage groups. However it has beenpossible to align these 21 linkage groups tothe 11 groups of the reference map. Amongthe 136 markers, 63%, 20% and 17% mark-ers are segregating respectively as F2, back-cross to BP 409 and backcross to BP 961.This map includes the highest percentageof F2 <ab x ab> segregating loci with 17%compared to 1.5% for the CPA and 0% forthe CPB. This result underlines again the lowgenetic diversity between the two heterozy-gous BP clones that displays only the twoalleles (a;b). Thus, 113 markers segregateto the first parental clone (BP 409) and 109segregate to the second parental clone(BP 961) (Table 2). This genetic map covers1006 cM, about of 72% of the referencemap length with an average distance betweentwo loci of 8.9 cM. Previously, a maplength can be affected by the level ofhomology of the mapped parents such as inpapaya (Ma et al., 2004) but also by thekind of markers (Hendre et al., 2008).
To be useful in breeding programs,markers should reveal polymorphism indifferent populations derived from a widerange of parental genotypes (Langridge etal., 2001). In this study, some markerscould be mapped in a population but not ina second one. It suggests that the loci het-erozygosity was different among these popu-lations. The example of homolog map of link-age group B of the three genetic maps ofthree populations is presented in Figure 2.Due to the presence of different polymor-phic markers in these three populations, thegap regions observed on the three maps aredifferent. However, almost common markersare positioned in the same order on thesethree genetic maps.
As mentioned earlier each backcross(BC) genetic map was developed from acommon parent from two populations. Con-sequently, the number of individuals usedto construct these backcross maps could beincreased through the merging of the twoCP populations. Therefore the number ofindividuals for BC BP 409, BC BP 961,and BC Q 121 were 175 (93 from CPB and82 from CPC), 160 (78 from CPA and 82from CPC) and 171 (78 from CPA and 93from CPB), respectively.
The markers used to construct the threeBC genetic maps have to be heterozygousfor the common parent. By this approach,a total of 63 shared markers could be usedto construct the BP 409 BC genetic map.They cover 980 cM and represent 70%of the reference map length with an av-erage distance between two loci of 21.3 cM.This genetic map is composed of 17 link-age groups easily assigned to the 11 link-age groups of the reference map. The ex-ample of linkage group A of BP 409 geneticmap is presented in Figure 3.
133
Transferability of SSR and SNP marker for genetic map development in Coffea canephora
PELITA PERKEBUNAN, Volume 26, Nomer 3, Edisi Desember 2010
Notes (Catatan) : 1) Three cross pollinated map were CPA (BP 961 x Q 121), CPB (BP 409 x Q 121), and CPC (BP 409 xBP 961). 2) Three backcross map were Q 121 (BP 961 x Q 121 and BP 409 x Q 121), BP 409 (BP 409 x Q 121and BP 409 x BP 961), and CPC (BP 961 x Q 121and BP 409 x BP 961), 3) F2 type segregation loci include a/bx a/b, a/b x c/d, and a/b x a/c.(Tiga peta genetik silangan terbuka adalah CPA (BP 961 x Q 121), CPB (BP 409x Q 121), dan CPC (BP 409 x BP 961). 2) Tiga peta genetik silang baik adalah Q 121 (BP 961 x Q 121 danBP 409 x Q 121), BP 409 (BP 409 x Q 121 dan BP 409 x BP 961), dan CPC (BP 961 x Q 121 dan BP 409 xBP 961), 3) Tipe segregasi F2 lokus meliputi a/b x a/b, a/b x c/d dan a/b x a/c).
Table 2. Summary of the genetic maps of Robusta coffee (Coffea canephora) can be used for QTL study
Tabel 2. Ringkasan peta genetik kopi Robusta (Coffea canephora) yang dapat digunakan untuk analisis QTL
DescriptionUraian
Cross pollinated map1)
Peta silangan terbukaBackcross map2)
Peta silangan balik Consensus genetic mapPeta genetik konsensus
CPA CPB CPC BP 409 BP 961 Q 121
Number of individuals 78 93 82 175 160 171 -Jumlah individu
Number of loci 199 280 136 63 46 133 381Jumlah lokus
Number of loci with F2 typesegregation3) 100 119 86 - - - -Jumlah lokus dengan tipesegregasi F2
Number of loci with BC typesegregation to BP 409 - 99 27 63 - - -Jumlah lokus dengan tipesegregasi silang balikpada BP409
Number of loci with BC typesegregation to BP 961 45 - 23 - 46 - -Jumlah lokus dengan tipe segregasi silang balik padaBP961
Number of loci with BC typesegregation to Q 121 54 62 - - - 133 -Jumlah lokus dengan tipesegregasi silang balik padaQ 121
Average distance between twoloci,cM/loci 6.2 4.9 8.9 21.3 17.1 8.6 3.6Rerata jarak antara dualokus,cM/loci
Genetic map length, cM 1,165 1,320 1,006 980 547 947 1,325Panjang peta genetic, cM
Proportion of genetic maplength to reference geneticmap (%) 84 95 72 70 39 68 95Proporsi panjang peta genetikterhadap peta genetic acuan
Number of linkage groups( LOD e” 5) 11 11 21 17 14 12 11Jumlah kelompok tautan( LOD e” 5)
A total of 46 shared markers couldbe used to construct the BP 961 BC ge-netic map, covering 547 cM representingonly 39% of the reference map length. Theloci average distance was 17.1 cM. Thehighest distance between two loci was 54cM (linkage group K). Due to the low num-ber of common markers on the linkage
groups H and J, these two groups werenot constructed. This genetic map includes14 linkage groups; however they could eas-ily be assigned to nine linkage groups ofthe reference map. The example of link-age group A of BP 961 BC genetic mapis presented in Figure 3.
134
Priyono et al.
PELITA PERKEBUNAN, Volume 26, Nomer 3, Edisi Desember 2010
M4810CMA25913089448AY2429930492515AJ87189516
30014427
29957539M32944BAC_DK46CO2_3746
CMA14761M37162
30095771306869M43181CMA002852996389330163094CMA26596300231101304642307551104M472105M327106304843108
M508117CMA298121
M509127AY2455131
R14137
CMA267145A8784151R34153300802158
CMA233170M449175
303234186
CMA222193
303012207M362209AY2453215
LG B_CPB
3044510CMA0574
AJ87189510
3001442230268423
29957534M32936
CMA14764
31033471
M43186CMA27089CMA0029330163096CMA265100
307551109M472113AY2464118M508122CMA298124
M509135
CMA267144A8784147
CMA233171
M449179
303398191
303012202
LG B_CPA
3001440
2997468
M32917
LG B1_CPC
CMA1470
3009577
30432415
CMA00231
M472M3274930755151
30439959M50864
M50981
LG B2_CPC
CMA2330M4493
30301237
LG B3_CPC
M4810CMA25913089448AY2429930492515AJ87189516
30014427
29957539M32944BAC_DK46CO2_3746
CMA14761M37162
30095771306869M43181CMA002852996389330163094CMA26596300231101304642307551104M472105M327106304843108
M508117CMA298121
M509127AY2455131
R14137
CMA267145A8784151R34153300802158
CMA233170M449175
303234186
CMA222193
303012207M362209AY2453215
LG B_CPB
3044510CMA0574
AJ87189510
3001442230268423
29957534M32936
CMA14764
31033471
M43186CMA27089CMA0029330163096CMA265100
307551109M472113AY2464118M508122CMA298124
M509135
CMA267144A8784147
CMA233171
M449179
303398191
303012202
LG B_CPA
3001440
2997468
M32917
LG B1_CPC
CMA1470
3009577
30432415
CMA00231
M472M3274930755151
30439959M50864
M50981
LG B2_CPC
CMA2330M4493
30301237
LG B3_CPC
M4810CMA25913089448AY2429930492515AJ87189516
30014427
29957539M32944BAC_DK46CO2_3746
CMA14761M37162
30095771306869M43181CMA002852996389330163094CMA26596300231101304642307551104M472105M327106304843108
M508117CMA298121
M509127AY2455131
R14137
CMA267145A8784151R34153300802158
CMA233170M449175
303234186
CMA222193
303012207M362209AY2453215
LG B_CPBM4810CMA25913089448AY2429930492515AJ87189516
30014427
29957539M32944BAC_DK46CO2_3746
CMA14761M37162
30095771306869M43181CMA002852996389330163094CMA26596300231101304642307551104M472105M327106304843108
M508117CMA298121
M509127AY2455131
R14137
CMA267145A8784151R34153300802158
CMA233170M449175
303234186
CMA222193
303012207M362209AY2453215
LG B_CPB
3044510CMA0574
AJ87189510
3001442230268423
29957534M32936
CMA14764
31033471
M43186CMA27089CMA0029330163096CMA265100
307551109M472113AY2464118M508122CMA298124
M509135
CMA267144A8784147
CMA233171
M449179
303398191
303012202
LG B_CPA
3044510CMA0574
AJ87189510
3001442230268423
29957534M32936
CMA14764
31033471
M43186CMA27089CMA0029330163096CMA265100
307551109M472113AY2464118M508122CMA298124
M509135
CMA267144A8784147
CMA233171
M449179
303398191
303012202
LG B_CPA
3001440
2997468
M32917
LG B1_CPC
CMA1470
3009577
30432415
CMA00231
M472M3274930755151
30439959M50864
M50981
LG B2_CPC
CMA2330M4493
30301237
LG B3_CPC
3001440
2997468
M32917
LG B1_CPC
CMA1470
3009577
30432415
CMA00231
M472M3274930755151
30439959M50864
M50981
LG B2_CPC
CMA2330M4493
30301237
LG B3_CPC
Figure 2. An example of homolog marker of the linkage group B of three CP genetic maps.
Gambar 2. Contoh kesepadanan marker peta genetik kelompok tautan B pada tiga peta genetik silanganterbuka.
Notes (Catatan): CPA (BP 961 x Q 121), CPB (BP 409 x Q 121), CPC (BP 409 x BP 961). Green, blue, and violet locicolour show that these loci heterozygote to BP 409, Q 121, and BP961 parent, respectively. Red loci colourshows that these loci heterozygote to both parent in each population (CPA (BP 961 x Q 121), CPB (B P409 xQ 121), CPC (BP 409 x BP 961). Lokus berwarna hijau, biru dan violet berturut-turut menunjukkan polasegregasi silang balik pada BP 409, Q 121, and BP 961. Lokus warna merah menunjukkan heterozigot padakedua induk).
135
Transferability of SSR and SNP marker for genetic map development in Coffea canephora
PELITA PERKEBUNAN, Volume 26, Nomer 3, Edisi Desember 2010
Finally, a total of 133 shared mark-ers could be used to construct the Q 121BC genetic map. They cover 947 cM rep-resenting 68% of the reference map lengthwith an average distance between two lociof 8.6 cM. This genetic map includes 12linkage groups easily assigned to the 11linkage groups of the reference map. Theexample of linkage group A of Q 121 BCgenetic map is presented in Figure 3.
One of the main uses of the DNAmarkers in agricultural research is the es-tablishment of linkage maps for diverse cropspecies. These maps have been utilized foridentifying chromosomal regions thatcontain genes controlling simple traits andquantitative traits using QTL analysis(Collard et al., 2005). Using largersegregating populations, the QTL detectionwill be largely improved. In our study ahigher number of markers have also beena key factor when analyzing several parentsin multi-cross experiments. It is also veryimportant for “high-resolution mapping”(at least <5 cM but ideally <1 cM), moretightly-linked markers and also todiscriminate between a single gene andseveral genes involved in a single QTL(Mohan et al., 1997).
Comparative mapping reveals a highdegree of co-linearity within species but alsobetween closely related species. This allowsthe transfer of markers between these maps.A good transferability within species wasreported in Eucalyptus sp. (Brondani et al.,2006) and Triticum sp. (Peng et al., 2000).Kuleung et al. (2004) reported the inter-specific transferability of SSR markers be-tween wheat (Triticum aestivum), rye(Secale cereale), and triticale (X TriticosecaleWittmack). 17% of wheat SSR markers weretransferable to rye, whereas 25% of ryemarkers were amplificable in wheat. 58%of wheat and 39% of rye markers could betransferred in Triticale. Although SSR mark-
ers were reported have a high transfer-ability to other coffee species (Cubryet al., 2008; Hendre et al., 2008; Poncetet al., 2004; Poncet et al., 2007), untiltoday, no report on the transferability ofgenetic map both within species and amongcoffee species is available.
Today, an important advance in ge-netic has been achieved by the construc-tion of a high density reference geneticmap of C. canephora using only co-domi-nant markers. This map is involving 831loci and covering 1392 cM. Moreover,several hundred of new SSR have beenadded to this reference genetic map andcurrently more than 1200 loci have beenmapped. Some of these markers are comingfrom collaborative work involving differentinstitutes and universities worldwide suchas: IRD and CIRAD (France), TriesteUniversity (Italy), CENICAFE (Colombia),Illionis University (USA), and Viosa Fed-eral University (Brazil) (D. Crouzillat,person.comm.). Present study showed thatsix genetic maps which developed usingSSR markers selected from this referencegenetic map showed the good homologyand high co-linearity. These results sug-gesting that this reference genetic map isreliable map.
Looking at the patterns generated bySSR, it is now claimed that, apart from ge-netic diversity, these markers are ideal forgenetic maps. In present study, all mark-ers selected from the reference map, showedthe highest success when mapped both forthe two others population (BP 961 x Q 121and BP 409 x Q 121) and three BC geneticmaps. It suggests that SSR and SNP markersare simple and fast for creating transferablemaps and for the generation of markers forhigh throughput genotyping. These trans-ferable markers can be exploited for fur-ther coffee genetic and breeding studies. Thegeneralized use of an increasingly larger set
136
Priyono et al.
PELITA PERKEBUNAN, Volume 26, Nomer 3, Edisi Desember 2010
R1740000
AY243411CFGA0691331063616R10818
CMA00842
29957562
R12683
A885691
LG C_Q121
CMA1010000
3007648888
R17422
CMA17835
M32351
CMA00877
LG C_BP409
R1740000
AY24344444CMA1786666
R10814
CMA00841
LG C_BP961
R1740000
AY243411CFGA0691331063616R10818
CMA00842
29957562
R12683
A885691
LG C_Q121
R1740000
AY243411CFGA0691331063616R10818
CMA00842
29957562
R12683
A885691
LG C_Q121
CMA1010000
3007648888
R17422
CMA17835
M32351
CMA00877
LG C_BP409
CMA1010000
3007648888
R17422
CMA17835
M32351
CMA00877
LG C_BP409
R1740000
AY24344444CMA1786666
R10814
CMA00841
LG C_BP961
R1740000
AY24344444CMA1786666
R10814
CMA00841
LG C_BP961
Figure 3. An example of the homolog markers of linkage group C of the three backcross genetic maps.
Gambar 3.Contoh kesepadanan marka pada kelompok tautan C pada tiga peta genetik silang balik.
LG C_ BP 961LG C_ Q 121
137
Transferability of SSR and SNP marker for genetic map development in Coffea canephora
PELITA PERKEBUNAN, Volume 26, Nomer 3, Edisi Desember 2010
of transferable markers, will allow fasterand more precise investigations about QTLsynteny among species, QTL validationacross different genetic backgrounds, andpositioning of a growing number of candi-date genes co-localized with QTLs.
Darvasi et al. (1993) reported that thepower for QTL detection was virtually thesame for 10 cM marker spacing as for aninfinite number of markers, and only slightlydecreases for 20-50 cM spacing. If theobjective is to detect major QTLs, theaverage span between loci should be closefrom 10 cM. Several map intervals largerthan 20 cM were observed in this study.The higher the number of intervals largerthan 20 cM the lower the heterozygosity ofthe parents used to develop the map. Thesefrequencies were 0 for CPB, 7 for CPA,and 18 for CPC. These results were possiblydue to the high genetic diversity betweenthe parents BP 409 and Q 121, on thecontrary of BP 409 and BP 961 which werecloser reducing the number of mappablepolymorphic. Furthermore, the coverage andhigh density marker of 6.2 (CPA), 4.9(CPB), 8.9 (CPC), and 8.6 (BC Q 121)of these maps are satisfactory for QTL de-tection, except for CPC which has 18 in-tervals greater than 20 cM. Considering thebackcross genetic maps, an average distanceof 21.3 (BC BP 409) and 17.1 (BC BP 961)between two loci was observed. However,these maps are characterized by a high fre-quency of gaps greater than 20 cM, in thelinkage maps (21 for BC BP 409 and 12for both BC BP 961 and BC Q 121). Inthese regards these maps cannot be used forQTL detection. Therefore, it looks necessaryto pursue the construction of a linkage mapsaturated with diverse types of markersespecially for gap regions.
Consensus map
If shared markers have been incor-porated into different maps, these geneticmaps can be aligned together to producea consensus map, which provides a frame-work to align partial and complete link-age maps (Ablett et al., 2003; Karakousiset al., 2003). This map allows research-ers to rapidly and accurately select markersof chromosome regions of interest. In thisstudy, the development of the consensusmap was undertaken for localizing andcomparing the location of QTLs detectedon the six different genetic maps (Fig-ure 4). Due to this objective, the consen-sus map of C. canephorawas constructed by joining three indepen-dent CP maps. The present result showedthat all the loci previously mapped couldeasily be arranged on the 11 linkagegroups, using a LOD score threshold of5.0. Concerning the loci origin, 35.4%,56.7% and 18.6% of these markers arecoming respectively from CPB, CPA andCPC genetic maps (Table 1). Only 17 %of the loci are shared by the three CP mapsbut they are very important with regardsto the establishment of the consensus ge-netic map and for the comparison of QTLs.Seven genetic maps developed in presentstudy are summarized in Table 2. Inter-esting to be noted that all markers mappedin consensus map are homolog with threeCP maps used to develop this map. More-over, almost markers of consensus mapare colinier with the three CP maps. Onlyminor differences can be observed (Fig-ure 4). These results clearly again con-firm that SSR and SNP markers used inthis study showing a high transferabilityin genetic mapping.
In this study the consensus map is,in fact, based on the consolidation of seg-
138
Priyono et al.
PELITA PERKEBUNAN, Volume 26, Nomer 3, Edisi Desember 2010
Figu
re 4
.C
onse
nsus
gen
etic
map
whi
ch in
tegr
ated
fro
m th
e th
ree
popu
latio
ns (
CPA
, C
PB a
nd C
PB)
in R
obus
ta c
offe
e.
Gam
bar
4. P
eta
gene
tik c
onse
nsus
yan
g di
intr
egra
si d
ari t
iga
popo
lasi
(C
PA
, C
PB
dan
CP
C)
kopi
Rob
usta
.
CONS
ENSU
S M
AP B
ASED
ON
THE
THRE
E PO
PULA
TIO
NS O
F RO
BUST
A CO
FFEE
R103
0M
372
130
1344
230
0333
831
0806
1030
5581
17R2
6420
M35
429
CMA1
0833
AY22
0271
34R1
68CM
A276
35M
497
39A8
834
40M
464
4930
1331
5030
7424
5330
1944
5631
1050
63CM
A068
67R2
4070
A885
072
M42
879
2993
6180
3043
9681
3041
0889
CFG
A054
91R2
1694
3017
5996
3023
3198
AY24
6210
0A8
792
103
R336
105
M36
410
9CM
A010
110
3000
88R2
611
330
8158
115
A879
312
5
A
M48
10
CM
A259
130
4451
630
8944
8C
MA0
579
AY24
2910
3049
25AJ
8718
9515
3001
4427
3026
8429
2997
4636
2995
7540
M32
944
BAC
_DK4
6CO
2_37
4730
4324
59C
MA1
4763
M37
164
3103
3471
3009
5774
3068
69M
431
84C
MA2
7087
CM
A002
9030
1630
9629
9638
98C
MA2
6599
3002
3110
630
7551
3046
4210
8M
327
109
M47
211
030
4843
112
AY24
6411
730
4399
119
M50
812
3C
MA2
9812
5M
509
135
AY24
5513
6R
1414
4A8
784
145
CM
A267
151
R34
159
3008
0216
4C
MA2
3317
6M
449
182
3032
3419
130
3398
197
CM
A222
199
3030
1221
2M
362
214
AY24
5322
0
B
3038
320
3007
647
CMA1
0112
R174
24CM
A178
32BA
CED9
8945
4AY
2434
33CF
GA06
934
3106
3637
R108
39M
323
46A8
883
4930
4269
54CM
A008
CFGA
244
65
M51
681
R107
8329
9557
86CM
A193
90R2
2295
R126
100
AY24
6610
3CM
A055
113
3111
9211
4A8
856
116
3109
3911
8
C
A888
40
A883
77
R135
3087
1011
M42
912
AJ87
1886
13M
413
14M
430
1830
3734
24CM
A020
304c
l330
4218
31CM
A122
35CF
GA22
7A37
CMA1
7339
R301
45M
444
49R1
4851
CMA2
3053
M45
558
3057
8659
ZAP3
263
CMA1
5567
M34
268
M40
170
3005
9774
M42
329
9312
81A8
842
91M
382
92M
355
9430
4039
M47
111
4
D
2993
200
CFG
A227
B3
3022
594
3056
26A
830
5626
B10
M40
314
R275
15CF
GA2
8117
R202
31
2999
8649
CMA1
5850
3105
5458
3089
4865
R43
6630
2079
68CM
A254
7130
6357
81R2
0683
A881
485
3016
5688
3013
1689
R278
91CF
GA4
9192
R354
96AY
2457
102
E
3014
400
CMA2
36M
489
1CM
A160
5M
353
CMA2
806
R175
830
4697
13M
328
M45
814
CMA0
1821
AY24
4125
CMA1
88M
503
27M
399
QTL
6029
R331
3130
6923
41CM
A118
43Cc
SPS1
46CM
A130
M34
550
R189
53M
334
56CM
A244
5930
3383
6029
9971
72S1
0974
CMA2
4576
3000
1880
AJ87
1896
81M
381
82R3
2586
CMA0
8090
M40
8CM
A055
M41
691
A882
594
CMA1
4310
2CM
A086
111
CFG
A035
112
M30
7AR1
2711
4R3
5111
6CM
A007
119
M40
3M
331
126
CMA1
1712
7AY
2456
137
2998
8214
3R3
6714
730
0985
149
F
3024
200
M48
67
3014
818
3025
709
R159
17R3
3920
3080
5123
3118
0224
CMA0
9826
M35
836
M36
340
M30
7B41
R157
43M
310
46M
499
55CM
A249
5630
0438
60M
387
M33
5CM
A207
68
CMA1
1070
M40
430
1182
7331
0293
81CM
A127
93M
379
94M
438
97CM
A264
100
M44
610
4M
406
105
CFGA
280
R262
109
3040
4111
0AY
2462
113
G
3046
060
CMA2
208
3067
2219
CMA2
6924
M386
27CM
A111
31A2
045
3021
3054
M314
5730
4156
M356
6230
9973
6330
9108
7130
1950
7629
9661
86M3
6030
3236
91M4
1892
M321
94M5
0497
M306
9830
3195
2995
6510
4M3
1610
5R1
4210
6M4
6010
7M4
5611
4
H
CMA2
46M
441
0
3046
5515
3073
3919
3099
8722
R307
23CM
A241
27
2992
5943
R250
5330
3604
6130
6791
6630
8444
6730
3320
76CM
A019
7830
4861
CMA1
9881
I
A880
20
M41
45
3009
4311
3020
8914
M45
919
M36
920
CMA0
2823
CMA0
4329
R290
31CM
A279
35M
348
41M
378
44CM
A303
46M
421
4829
9927
5230
1143
54A8
811
59CM
A294
M48
064
M37
070
3001
2877
M34
787
CMA0
0689
M50
191
R378
9431
0741
9930
6436
102
CMA1
1310
4M
452
3018
9210
5M
492
108
J
M39
50
CMA2
635
AY22
0278
17A8
845
24CM
A074
25M
422
27M
513
29A8
858
30ZA
P25
37CM
A151
39M
448
M36
130
1696
41
3104
0342
3115
90CM
A291
4630
0133
52R1
1153
M32
460
M47
561
CMA0
59CM
A161
66A8
847
68M
494
7231
1103
M31
276
CMA2
0079
CMA1
6780
3040
6281
K
139
Transferability of SSR and SNP marker for genetic map development in Coffea canephora
PELITA PERKEBUNAN, Volume 26, Nomer 3, Edisi Desember 2010
regating markers from three independentCP genetic maps. While the total lengthof the consensus map is close from thatof the three individual maps, the total num-ber of loci is larger resulting in a highermarker density and a reduced averageinterloci distance. It is estimated that mark-ers of the consensus map are very closefrom their true position as determined onthe three maps. All linked SSR and SNPmarkers mapped consistently on the samelinkage groups in the three CP maps andmost of the markers mapped with the sameorder along the homologous existing link-age groups. Consequently, it could beclaimed that the QTLs detected from thethree individual CP maps as well as fromthe three backcross maps, are quite pre-cisely localized on this consensus map.
Present report significantly increasesthe availability of microsatellite markersand mapping information for Robusta cof-fee. This work represents an important stepforward for Coffea comparative genomics,opening stimulating perspectives for evolu-tionary studies and molecular breeding ap-plications. The generalized use of an increas-ingly larger set of interspecific transferablemarkers and consensus mapping informa-tion, will allow faster and more detailed in-vestigations of QTL synteny among species,validation of expression-QTL across vari-able genetic backgrounds and positioning ofa growing number of candidate genes co-localized with QTLs, to be tested in asso-ciation mapping experiments.
CONCLUSIONS
Based on the SSR and SNP markersused in present study, it could be concludedthat the BP 409 and BP 961 clones belongto the Congolese group and the Q 121 cloneis rather part of the Conilon per Guineanhybrid group. These parental clones have
a high heterozygosity level, namely 52%,53% and 40% for BP 409, BP 961 andQ 121 clones, respectively. All SSR and SNPmarkers selected from the reference geneticmap of C. canephora have a high transfer-ability when used to develop three CP maps,three BC maps, and one consensus map ofthis species. Our genetic maps lead to beused for detection of quantitative trait locidetection.
Acknowladgement
The authors thank to Indonesian Cof-fee and Cocoa Research Institute, PT NestleIndonesia and Nestle R&D Centre Tours forsupporting this project.
REFERENCES
Ablett, G.A.; A. Karakousis; L. Banbury; M.Cakir; T.A. Holton; P. Langridge & R.J.Henry (2003). Application of SSR markersin the construction of Australian barleygenetic maps. Aust. J. Agric. Res., 54,1187—1195.
Brondani, R.P.V.; E.R. William; C. Bron-bani & D. Grattapaglia (2006). A micro-satellite-based consensus linkage map forspecies of Eucalyptus and a novel set of230 microsatellite markers for the genus.BMC Plant Biol., 6, 1—20.
Collard, B.C.Y.; M.Z. Jahufer; J.B.Brouwer & E.C.K. Pang (2005). An in-troduction to markers; quantitative traitloci (QTL) mapping and marker-assistedselection for crop improvement: The ba-sic concepts. Euphytica, 142, 169–196.
Coulibaly, I.; B. Revol; M. Noirot; V.Poncet; M. Lorieux; C. Crasco-Lacombe; J. Minier; M. Dufour & P.Hamon (2003). AFLP and SSR polymor-phism in Coffea interspecific baccrossprogen{(C. heterocalyx x C. canephora)
140
Priyono et al.
PELITA PERKEBUNAN, Volume 26, Nomer 3, Edisi Desember 2010
x C. canephora}. Theor. Appl. Genet.,107, 1148—1155.
Cramer, P.J.S. (1957) Review of CoffeeResearch in Indonesia. Inter-AmericanInstitute of Agricultural Science;Turrialba; Costa Rica. 262p.
Cubry, P.; P. Musoli; H. Legnaté; D. Pot;F. de Bellis; V. Poncet; F. Anthony; M,Dufour & T. Leroy (2008). Diversity incoffee assessed with SSR markers: struc-ture of genus Coffea and perpectives forbreeding. Genome, 51, 50—63.
Darvasi, A.; A. Weinreb; V. Minke; J.I.Weller & M. Soller (1993). Detectingmarker-QTL linkage and estimating QTLgene effect and map location using asaturated genetic map. Genetics, 134,943—951.
Flandez-Galvez, H.; R. Ford; E.C.K. Pang& P.W.J. Taylor (2003). An intraspecificlinkage map of the chickpea (Cicerarietinum L.) genome based on sequencetagged microsatellite site and resistancegene analog markers. Theor. Appl.Genet., 106, 1447—1456.
Hamon, P.; I. Coulibaly; B. Revol (2005).AFLP and SSR polymorphism in aCoffea interspecific backcross progeny(Coffea heterocalyx x C. canephora) xC. canephora). 20th International Con-ference on Coffee Science, 11-15 Octo-ber 2004, Bangalore, India. Paris: ASIC.p. 699—701.
Hartl, D. & E. Jones (2001). Genetics:Analysis of Genes and Genomes. Jonesand Bartlett Publishers.
Hendre, S. & R.K. Aggarwal (2007). DNAmarkers: development and application forgenetic improvement of coffee. p.399—434. In: Varshney, RK & R. Tuberrosa(eds) Genomic Assisted crop ImprovementVol 2: genomic Application in Crops,Springer.
Hendre, P.S.; R. Phanidranath; V. Anna-purna; A. Lalremruata & R. Aggarwal(2008). Development of new genomicmicrosatellite markers from Robustacoffee (Coffea canephora) showingbroad cross-species transferability andutility in genetic studies. BMC PlantBiol., 8, 1—19.
Karakousis, A.; J.P. Gustafson; K.J.Chalmers; A.R. Barr & P. Langridge(2003). A consensus map of barley in-tegrating SSR; RFLP; and AFLP mark-ers. Aust. J. Agric. Res., 54, 1173—1185
Kosambi, D. (1944). The estimation of mapdistances from recombination values.Ann. Eugen, 12, 172—175.
Kuleung, C.; P. Baenziger & I. Dweikat(2004). Transferability of SSR markersamong wheat; rye; and triticale. Theor.Appl. Genet., 108, 1147—1150.
Langridge, P.; E. Lagudah; T. Holton;R. Appels; P. Sharp & K. Chalmers (2001).Trends in genetic and genome analysesin wheat: A review. Aust. J. Agric. Res.,52, 1043–1077.
Lashermes, P.; M.C. Combes; S. Prakash;N. Rouslo; M. Lorieux & A. Charrier(2001). Genetic linkage map of Coffeacanephora: effect of segregation dis-tortion anad analysis of recombinanationrate in male and female meiosies. Ge-nome, 44, 589–596.
Lopez, G. & M.D.P. Moncada (2006).Constribution of an interspecific geneticlinkage map from a Coffea liberica xC. eugenioides F1 population. 21th inter-national Scientific Colloquium on Cof-fee; Montpellier. 11-15 September 2006,Paris; France: ASIC; 523–546.
Ma, H.; P.H. Moore; Z. Liu; M.S. Kim;Q. Yu; M.M.M. Fitch; T. Sekioka;A.H. Paterson & R.Ming (2004). High-
141
Transferability of SSR and SNP marker for genetic map development in Coffea canephora
PELITA PERKEBUNAN, Volume 26, Nomer 3, Edisi Desember 2010
Density Linkage Mapping RevealedSuppression of Recombination at the SexDetermination Locus in Papaya. Genetics166, 419–436.
Mohan, M.; S. Nair; A. Bhagwat; T.G.Krishna; M. Yano; C.R. Bhatia & T.Sasaki (1997). Genome mapping; mo-lecular markers and marker-assisted se-lection in crop plants. Mol Breed, 3, 87–103.
Paillard, M.; P. Lashermes & V. Petiard(1996). Construction of a molecular link-age map in coffee. Theor. Appl. Genet.,93, 41–47.
Pearl, H.M.; C. Nagai; P.H. Moore; D.L.Steiger; R.V. Osgood & R. Ming (2004).Construction of genetic map for Arabicacoffee. Theor. Appl. Genet., 108, 829–835.
Peng, J.; B. Abraham; B. Korol & T. Fahima(2000). Molecular genetic maps in Triti-cum dicoccoides: genome-wide co-verage; massive negative interference;and putative quasi-linkage. Genome Res.,10, 1509–1531.
Poncet, V.; M. Dufour; P. Hamon; S. Hamon;A. de Kochko & T. Leroy (2007). De-velopment of genomic microsatellitemarkers in Coffea canephora and theirtransferability to other coffee species.Genome, 50, 1156–1161.
Poncet, V.; P. Hamon; J. Minier; C.Carasco; S. Hamon & M. Noirot (2004).SSR cross-amplification and variationwithin coffee tress (Coffea spp.).Genome, 47, 1071–1081.
Priyono (1998). Cartographie genetique d’unepopulation F1 de Coffea canephora.Memoire de DIRS; Universite deTours; France.
Priyono (2010). Analyse de caracteresquantitatifs (QTLs) determinant lacapacite a. Embryogenese somatiqueet differentes caracteristiquse agro-nomiques et biochimiques chez Coffeacanephora Pierre. These Universite deRennes 1.; France 193pp.
Tanksley, S.D. (1993). Mapping polygenes.Annu. Rev. Genet., 27, 205–233.
V. Ooijen,V. J.W. (2006). Joinmap®4 Softwarefor the calculation of genetic linkagemaps in experimental populations.Kyazma, Wagening.
*********