Transactional Analysis Final

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/31/2019 Transactional Analysis Final

    1/45

    Presented by:Aanchal AggarwMBA HR-3Roll no. 1

  • 7/31/2019 Transactional Analysis Final

    2/45

    ABOUT TA

    Proposed by Dr.Eric Berne in mid1960s in his book

    Games People

    Play Popularized by

    Thomas A. Harris,author ofthe bookI'm OK - You're OK,and Muriel James,author of Born to

    Win.

  • 7/31/2019 Transactional Analysis Final

    3/45

    TA offers a model of personality anddynamics of self and its relationship to

    others that makes possible a clear andmeaningful discussion of behavior.

    When two people interact with each other

    they engage in social transactions in whichone person responds to the another.

    Study of such social transactions is

    known as Transactional Analysis. It is used to study and analyze

    interpersonal communication

  • 7/31/2019 Transactional Analysis Final

    4/45

    EGO STATES:

  • 7/31/2019 Transactional Analysis Final

    5/45

  • 7/31/2019 Transactional Analysis Final

    6/45

    PARENT EGO STATE:

    CRITICALPARENT(CP) NURTURINGPARENTS

    Words:you should, must, never; youcannot do that; thats childish;everybody knows that; how couldyou?; proverbs, idioms, moralisingcomments

    Voice: sharp, decisive, strained,impatient, patronising, dressing-down

    Gesture, mimicry, attitude:Point-finger arouse, eyebrow high,head trembling, shoulders stiff;

    Words: good, nice, lovely , Wellarrange/ manage this, what kind ofwishes do you have?, can I help you?Dont worry, dont get angry, ...

    Voice: with love, smooth,comforting, attentive, soothing

    Gesture, mimicry, attitude:Body towards the receiver, arms aremoving towards the receiver

  • 7/31/2019 Transactional Analysis Final

    7/45

    This ego state is basically based upon reasoning,seeking and providing information.

    It usually involves thoughtful concentration and factualdiscussion.Words:what, why, how, where, who; correct; practical; what are the facts?; Whatfollows?; What is necessary, what fits?; I conclude

    Voice:objective, balanced, correct, monotone

    Gesture, mimicry, attitude:thoughtful, observant, open, eye contact, upright, open-minded,interested, perceptive, testing, concentrated

    ADULT EGO STATE:

    Adult (A)

  • 7/31/2019 Transactional Analysis Final

    8/45

    CHILD EGO STATE:

    FREE CHILDREBELLIOUS

    CHILD

    ADAPTED

    CHILD

    Words:didnt do it; no!!; you mustbe joking!; Why me?; Iwont take that; quit that!;youre nuts!; thats none of

    your business!Voice: defiant,demanding, moody, loud,grumbling

    Gesture, mimicry, attitude:

    Closed up,chin and lipsforward, sprawled,stamping, pouting, stickingthe tongue out,refusing, protesting

    Words: Great!, nice!,; I need; I dont like ; Imangry,

    Voice: loud, free, energetic

    Gesture, mimicry, attitude:Laughing, air-kissing, directanger, crying, bright-eyed,open mouth, lively, excited,relaxed, playful,spontaneous,

    curious, expressing feelings

  • 7/31/2019 Transactional Analysis Final

    9/45

    Words: thank you, please,perhaps, I hope so, i wouldlike to, I dont know, Ill try,thats unfair, its always me

    Voice: monotone, humble,

    tearful, soft, pleading

    Gesture, mimicry, attitude:restrained, sad, pouting,closed, dejected, hangingshoulders, downcast glance,

    crossed arms and legs,shrugging, shy, fearful, givesin easily

    Adaptedchild

    Adapted child is trainedand is likely to do what theparents insist on.

  • 7/31/2019 Transactional Analysis Final

    10/45

    TRANSACTIONS:

    When a stimulus (verbal or non verbal) froma person is being responded by anotherperson, a transaction is said to occur.

    Depending upon ego states, they can bedivided into:

    ComplimentaryTransactions

    NonComplimentaryTransactions

    UlteriorTransactions

  • 7/31/2019 Transactional Analysis Final

    11/45

    COMPLIMENTARY TRANSACTION

    When the stimulus and responsepatterns from one ego state to anotherare parallel

  • 7/31/2019 Transactional Analysis Final

    12/45

    NON COMPLIMENTARY TRANSACTIONS

    May occur when the stimulus response linesare not parallel

    Happens when the person who initiatestransaction expecting a certain responsedoes not get it.

    Also known as crossed or blocked

    transactions.

    Crossed transaction is not satisfactorybecause the line of communication is

    blocked.

  • 7/31/2019 Transactional Analysis Final

    13/45

    Crossed/ Blocked Transaction

  • 7/31/2019 Transactional Analysis Final

    14/45

    ULTERIOR TRANSACTIONS:

    Is the most complex because communicationhas double meaning.

    When an ulterior message is sent it is oftendisguised in a socially acceptable way

    On surface level, the communication has aclear adult message whereas it carries a

    hidden message on the psychological level

    These are undesirable transactions.

  • 7/31/2019 Transactional Analysis Final

    15/45

    Ulterior Transaction

  • 7/31/2019 Transactional Analysis Final

    16/45

    Example of an ulterior transaction: Student: I don't understand what you are saying.

    Teacher: What exactly do you not understand?Thestudent's transaction is ulterior, while the teacherfeels that she has explained things clearly. Thestudent may seem to be talking from their Adult EgoState, however, the message is coming from theirNegative Controlling Parent. The best way for the

    teacher to respond is in a calm, assertive manner,keeping the idea of Adult Ego State, and hoping toreturn the transaction to complementary.

  • 7/31/2019 Transactional Analysis Final

    17/45

  • 7/31/2019 Transactional Analysis Final

    18/45

    TRANSACTIONAL ANALYSIS AND

    COMMUNICATION

    Knowing about transactional analysis can bevery useful for improving our communicationskills

    TA is about how people are structuredpsychologically and is both a theory ofcommunication and child development.

    Communication under transactional analysis iseffective only when: The person who is communicating first, gets a

    response in the expected ego state. Ifcommunication is from a different ego state then thecommunication may be regarded as ineffective, themessage may be lost, not received or disregarded

    by the person receiving it.

  • 7/31/2019 Transactional Analysis Final

    19/45

    Communication between adult to adult egostate is likely to be the most effectivecommunication.

  • 7/31/2019 Transactional Analysis Final

    20/45

    THREE RULES OF COMMUNICATION:

    1st Rule:

    So long as transactions remain complementary,communication can continue indefinitely.

    2nd Rule :

    When a transaction is crossed, a break in communicationresults, and one or both individuals will need to shift egostates in order for the communication to be re-established

    3rd Rule:

    The behavioural outcome of an ulterior transaction (onewhere two messages are sent at the same time; oneovert social and one covert psychological) is determinedat the psychological level and not at the social level.

  • 7/31/2019 Transactional Analysis Final

    21/45

    MAKING COMMUNICATION EFFECTIVE WITH THE

    HELP OF TRANSACTIONAL ANALYSIS

    Try and keep the transaction complimentary

    Plan transactions: Try and get response inthe same ego state as expected. If that is notpossible try and shift the receivers ego state

    or communicate at some other time

    Try and identify if a person is habitually in

    one ego state and then decide ifcommunication to that ego state would beappropriate or not

  • 7/31/2019 Transactional Analysis Final

    22/45

    PLAYING GAMES

    Playing Games

    In Games People Play Berne identified that peoplehabitually adopt certain ego states (not necessarilyconsciously) and play games in the way they

    communicate with others. E.g. a person might say Im fat or Nobody Loves

    Me, they are in Adapted child. They expect anurturing parent response of no you are not or yes

    they do. If they received a response of I know youareor Youre right, everybody hates youthen theyhave received a reply that they didnt want.

  • 7/31/2019 Transactional Analysis Final

    23/45

    Games typically:

    Are repetitive

    Are played without Adult awareness

    Always end up with players experiencing racketfeeling.

    Games entail an exchange of ulterior

    transactions between the playersGames always include an element of surprise or

    confusion.

  • 7/31/2019 Transactional Analysis Final

    24/45

    Racket feeling a familiar emotion, learnedand encouraged in childhood, experienced inmany different stress situations, and useless as

    a means of problem solving but frequentlycarried out

    E.g. a client is shouting out his rage against his

    father. You see that the client has done thismany times before and experienced no lastingrelief so your hypothesis is that anger is a racketfeeling.

  • 7/31/2019 Transactional Analysis Final

    25/45

    When as grown-ups we continue to coverour authentic feelings with the feelings thatwere permitted to us as children, these

    substitute feelings are known as racketfeelings. If we experience a racket feelingand store it up instead of expressing it at the

    time, we are said to be saving a stamp

  • 7/31/2019 Transactional Analysis Final

    26/45

    STROKES:

    Strokes are units of recognition

    They can be:

    Positive ornegative

    Verbal ornon-verbal

    Conditionalor

    unconditional

  • 7/31/2019 Transactional Analysis Final

    27/45

    EXAMPLES:

    Positive strokes the receiver experiences it as beingpleasant.

    Eg: if you see your neighbour and smile at him and sayhello and if he smiles back saying yes its a great day. Itis a positive stroke.

    Negative strokes the receiver experiences it as beingpainful.

    Eg: If on your saying hello, the neighbour replies it was anice day until I saw you!.That is and example of a

    negative stroke. But any kind of stroke is better than no stroke at all. If the neighbour wouldnt have bothered to reply, it would

    have been a non verbal stroke.

  • 7/31/2019 Transactional Analysis Final

    28/45

    CONDITIONAL AND UNCONDITIONAL STROKES:

    Conditional strokes relate to what you do. Unconditional strokes relate to what you are. E.g. Conditional: That was a good piece of work

    That painting youve done is a real

    messI like you when u smile Unconditional: Your humour always brightens things

    upI hate you and all which you represent

    I Like you

  • 7/31/2019 Transactional Analysis Final

    29/45

    CASE STUDY ON COMMUNICATION GAP

  • 7/31/2019 Transactional Analysis Final

    30/45

    FACTS OF THE CASE

    Two large crates were brought to theassembly shop.

    Mohan, a worker watched the crates being

    unloaded and had some apprehensionsabout the same so he went to the foreman.

    He asked the foreman about the boxes, but

    the foreman shrugged his shoulders andwent away.

  • 7/31/2019 Transactional Analysis Final

    31/45

    Mohan still was inquisitive and asked anotherworker who also said that he didnt know.

    Mohan started contemplating and thinking what

    could be in the boxes. May be a new automatic machinery. There

    would not be enough jobs in the assemblyshops if the machinery is installed.

    Mohan became nervous and went over to thewater cooler where two other workers weregossiping.

  • 7/31/2019 Transactional Analysis Final

    32/45

    He heard them saying that the foreman didntwant to tell what was in the crates as it wasnew automatic machinery which would mean

    fewer jobs for them.Words spread like wild fire.

    Soon everyone grew very angry andshouted, if this is the way the managementtreats us, then lets teach them a lesson. Ifthey fire us, we ll fire the boxes.

  • 7/31/2019 Transactional Analysis Final

    33/45

    Hearing this the superintendent came runningand stood in the middle of the men.

    He asked what the matter was. After knowing

    the matter the supervisor explained them thatthe equipment was for the new plant and was tobe kept in this plant only for a few days.

    Everyones temper cooled down suddenly and

    one of them dejectedly said that he should havetold them.

    Mohan quietly slipped away.

  • 7/31/2019 Transactional Analysis Final

    34/45

    ANALYZING DIFFERENT EGO STATES EXHIBITED

    BY DIFFERENT PEOPLE DURING DIFFERENT

    TRANSACTIONS:

    Firstly, when Mohan asked the foreman whatwas their in the boxes..

    Mohan exhibited : Adult ego state Foreman exhibited :

    Child ego state: if the foreman knew what was

    their in the box and was allowed to tell theworker but he did not bother to tell. He showed anon verbal stroke in a negative manner.

  • 7/31/2019 Transactional Analysis Final

    35/45

    Again when Mohan was still inquisitive andasked the worker: Child ego state.

    The worker did not bother to reply: Child Ego

    state with a negative stroke.

    When Mohan was contemplating inside himand not communicating his apprehensions

    that was also wrong. This showed his childego state.

  • 7/31/2019 Transactional Analysis Final

    36/45

    Now when Mohan heard the other workersgossip and became a part of the gossipleading to a revolt then all the workers

    including Mohan showed a rebellious childego state.

    When the superintendent came in to solvethe matter: he showed a critical parent stage

    However the workers were still in rebelliouschild state, when the superintendent askedthem what the matter was.

  • 7/31/2019 Transactional Analysis Final

    37/45

    When Superintendent replied saying thatwas the equipment for their new plant: heacted in an adult ego state.

    When workers replied saying that thesuperintendent should have told them beforein a dejected tone; this was also child ego

    state.

  • 7/31/2019 Transactional Analysis Final

    38/45

  • 7/31/2019 Transactional Analysis Final

    39/45

    Ques 1)What is the problem in this case?

    There is problem with regards to communicationgap in the company basically due to crossed

    transactions The basic problem here is the crossed

    transaction: First when Mohan(adult ego state)asked the

    foreman about what was there in the boxes theforeman was not interested therefore exhibiting childego state and a non verbal negative stroke.Therefore the transaction here was crossed whichwas undesirable.

  • 7/31/2019 Transactional Analysis Final

    40/45

    Similarly, the other workers like Mohan askedthe foreman what was their in the boxes anddidnt get any response. In that case there was

    a problem of crossed transaction leading toagitation by all.

    The workers including Mohan did not bother toask the management instead they stood in unityagainst the management exhibiting rebelliouschild ego state thereby worsening the situation.

  • 7/31/2019 Transactional Analysis Final

    41/45

    Ques 2)Who is responsible for this episode? Partly the Foreman is responsible as he showed the

    wrong ego state at the wrong time. Had he toldMohan about what was their in the crates then and

    there the situation wouldnt have worsened. Mohan was also responsible as he got very hyper

    and inquisitive showing child ego state. Had hebehaved in a calm manner exhibiting adult ego state,

    the situation would have been fine. All the workers also exhibited childish ego and no one

    bothered to seek clarification from the managementthus making their own assumptions causing a

    problem.

  • 7/31/2019 Transactional Analysis Final

    42/45

    Ques 3)Do you feel that the workers would havenot agitated if there were two waycommunication between the management andthe workers?

    Yes the workers would not have agitated asthere apprehensions would have been sortedout earlier and there would have been a need to

    be angry. Earlier the transaction between the foreman and

    Mohan was crossed which caused a problemand after that complimentary childish egos lead

    to agitation.

  • 7/31/2019 Transactional Analysis Final

    43/45

    Had one person exhibited adult ego andasked for clarification from the right person atthe right time, there would have been so

    much confusion.

  • 7/31/2019 Transactional Analysis Final

    44/45

    REFERENCES:

    Games people play by Eric Berne

    http://www.google.co.in/#hl=en&source=hp&q=example+of+ulterior+transactions&oq=EX

    AMPLE+OF+ULTER&aq=0v&aqi=g-v1g-j1&aql=&gs_sm=c&gs_upl=1167l4020l0l7580l16l10l0l0

    http://lankton.com/handouts/ta.pdf

    Case Studies in HRM by RK Suri and SL Gupta

    http://www.google.co.in/http://www.google.co.in/http://www.google.co.in/http://www.google.co.in/http://www.google.co.in/http://lankton.com/handouts/ta.pdfhttp://lankton.com/handouts/ta.pdfhttp://www.google.co.in/http://www.google.co.in/http://www.google.co.in/http://www.google.co.in/http://www.google.co.in/http://www.google.co.in/http://www.google.co.in/http://www.google.co.in/
  • 7/31/2019 Transactional Analysis Final

    45/45