Upload
darva
View
33
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
TRAINING FOR THE WEIGHTS AND MEASURES OFFICIAL. COURSE CURRICULUM. TRAINING FOR THE WEIGHTS AND MEASURES OFFICIAL. COURSE CURRICULUM. TRAINING FOR THE WEIGHTS AND MEASURES OFFICIAL. Module Eight “Device Type Evaluation”. Eighth in a series of 14. General Overview. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
TRAINING FOR THETRAINING FOR THEWEIGHTS AND MEASURES WEIGHTS AND MEASURES
OFFICIALOFFICIAL
TRAINING FOR THETRAINING FOR THEWEIGHTS AND MEASURES WEIGHTS AND MEASURES
OFFICIALOFFICIAL
COURSE CURRICULUMCOURSE CURRICULUM
MODULE 1 Introduction
MODULE 2 Laws & Regulations
MODULE 3 Enforcement Procedures
MODULE 4 Legal Action
MODULE 5 Legal Metrology
MODULE 6 Field Standards & Test Equipment
MODULE 7 Basic Weighing / Measuring Principles
TRAINING FOR THETRAINING FOR THEWEIGHTS AND MEASURES WEIGHTS AND MEASURES
OFFICIALOFFICIAL
TRAINING FOR THETRAINING FOR THEWEIGHTS AND MEASURES WEIGHTS AND MEASURES
OFFICIALOFFICIAL
COURSE CURRICULUMCOURSE CURRICULUM
MODULE 8 Device Type Evaluation
MODULE 9 Weighing Devices
MODULE 10 Measuring Devices
MODULE 11 Weighmaster Enforcement
MODULE 12 Petroleum Products
MODULE 13 Quantity Control
MODULE 14 Service Agencies and Agents
TRAINING FOR THETRAINING FOR THEWEIGHTS AND MEASURES OFFICIALWEIGHTS AND MEASURES OFFICIAL
TRAINING FOR THETRAINING FOR THEWEIGHTS AND MEASURES OFFICIALWEIGHTS AND MEASURES OFFICIAL
Eighth in a series of 14
Module EightModule Eight“Device Type Evaluation”“Device Type Evaluation”
Module EightModule Eight“Device Type Evaluation”“Device Type Evaluation”
General OverviewGeneral OverviewGeneral OverviewGeneral Overview
This module will introduce you to type This module will introduce you to type evaluation, its history and development, and evaluation, its history and development, and its relationship with other organizations in its relationship with other organizations in the evaluation process.the evaluation process.
Module ObjectivesModule ObjectivesModule ObjectivesModule Objectives
Understand the purpose of type evaluation
Understand how to use type approval information
Become more adept at making initial inspections
Be able to effectively use enforcement tools for non-approved devices
Type EvaluationType EvaluationType EvaluationType Evaluation
Examination of weighing and measuring devices
To certify that design and performance complies with all applicable requirements
Provides confidence for manufacturer, user and consumer
Unlawful to use device commercially unless type approved
Type EvaluationType EvaluationType EvaluationType Evaluation
The evaluation process examines:The evaluation process examines:
Design features
Operating characteristics
Performance of prototype or pre-production weighing and measuring devices before commercial installation
California Type Evaluation Program California Type Evaluation Program (CTEP)(CTEP)
California Type Evaluation Program California Type Evaluation Program (CTEP)(CTEP)
The California Type Evaluation Program holds approvals dating back to 1922
California Type Evaluation Program California Type Evaluation Program (CTEP)(CTEP)
California Type Evaluation Program California Type Evaluation Program (CTEP)(CTEP)
1949 -1949 - Current statute enacted (Section 12500.5 of the B&P Code)
1960 -1960 - Few other states with approval programs Many accepted California approvalsNeed for a national program apparent
1980 -1980 - 16 approval authorities in the U.S. Lack of uniform approach
National Type Evaluation Program National Type Evaluation Program (NTEP)(NTEP)
National Type Evaluation Program National Type Evaluation Program (NTEP)(NTEP)
1976 –1976 – California is instrumental in forming a task force to develop a national program
An effective program mustAn effective program must::
Establish uniform procedures
Provide one evaluation to satisfy all states
Provide assurance device is capable of meeting HB 44 requirements
Provide information about devices that are successfully evaluated
1979 – California law amended1979 – California law amended
Agreements between National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) and other W&M jurisdictions to accept evaluations
1984 –1984 – National Type Evaluation Program established
National Type Evaluation Program National Type Evaluation Program (NTEP)(NTEP)
National Type Evaluation Program National Type Evaluation Program (NTEP)(NTEP)
National Type Evaluation (NTEP)National Type Evaluation (NTEP)National Type Evaluation (NTEP)National Type Evaluation (NTEP)
NTEP has helped promote uniformity
A single evaluation satisfies all jurisdictions
Reduces cost and time to market a device
Established consensus requirements for temperature, Electro-Magnetic Field (EMF) and Radio Frequency Interference (RFI)
Publication 14Publication 14 Publication 14Publication 14
Used by participating labs to evaluate devices
Embodies the requirements in Handbook 44
Ensures compliance before commercial use
Certificates of Approval or Certificates of Approval or ConformanceConformance
Certificates of Approval or Certificates of Approval or ConformanceConformance
California issuesCalifornia issues “ “Certificates of Approval”Certificates of Approval”
Certificates of Approval or ConformanceCertificates of Approval or ConformanceCertificates of Approval or ConformanceCertificates of Approval or Conformance
The certificates issued by NTEPNTEP are known as “Certificates of Conformance” or CC’s
They look and contain similar information
NIST Handbook 44NIST Handbook 44NIST Handbook 44NIST Handbook 44
Contains the tolerances and specifications used to evaluate devices
Is the basis for the testing procedures in Publication 14
Organization of Type EvaluationOrganization of Type EvaluationOrganization of Type EvaluationOrganization of Type Evaluation
National Type Evaluation ProgramNational Type Evaluation Program
California Type Evaluation ProgramCalifornia Type Evaluation Program
Mutual Recognition with CanadaMutual Recognition with Canada
National Conference on Weights and MeasuresNational Conference on Weights and Measures
Organization of Type EvaluationOrganization of Type EvaluationOrganization of Type EvaluationOrganization of Type Evaluation
Authorized under Division 5 of B&P Code
Program consists of three laboratories Liquid Measuring Devices
Weighing Devices Compressed Gases
Only program in the country that is fully certified in all areas of weighing and measuring
Also evaluates electric and vapor meters. No other state provides this type of evaluation
California Type Evaluation Program
Affords a continuous review and updating process for evolving technologies
Maintains several standing committees
The National Type Evaluation Committee is relevant to evaluation
Organization of Type EvaluationOrganization of Type EvaluationOrganization of Type EvaluationOrganization of Type Evaluation
National Type Evaluation Program
NTEP committee oversees the operation of the NTEP program
Sets goals and objectives as well as operating policies and procedures
Authorizes participating laboratories
Sponsors technical subcommittees called sectors
Organization of Type EvaluationOrganization of Type EvaluationOrganization of Type EvaluationOrganization of Type Evaluation
NTEP SectorsNTEP SectorsNTEP SectorsNTEP Sectors
Develop test procedures and evaluation criteria
Permit industry and W&M officials to find consensus
Combine technical expertise of industry with regulatory knowledge of officials
Provide standards that are responsive to and cost effective for the marketplace
The U.S. and Canada both operate type evaluation programs
Through a bilateral agreement each country recognizes the other’s examinations and tests of certain device types
Known as the “U.S./Canada Mutual recognition of Type Evaluation Program”
Mutual RecognitionMutual Recognition
Organization of Type EvaluationOrganization of Type EvaluationOrganization of Type EvaluationOrganization of Type Evaluation
Type Evaluation ProcessType Evaluation ProcessType Evaluation ProcessType Evaluation Process
The California Type Evaluation Program Information Guide is available on the Division’s website at www.cdfa.ca.gov/dms
Describes the evaluation process, documentation needed, applicant’s responsibility during and after evaluation
Type Evaluation ProcessType Evaluation ProcessType Evaluation ProcessType Evaluation Process
National Type Evaluation information can be found at www.ncwm.net
Information is similar to that given in the California Information Guide
Field Enforcement Role in Field Enforcement Role in Type ApprovalType Approval
Field Enforcement Role in Field Enforcement Role in Type ApprovalType Approval
Type Approval certificates are a resource for the field official
Field officials provide a valuable service for CTEP by “discovering” non-approved equipment or systems
CTEP staff can assist in determining compliance
If not approved, CTEP staff can arrange for manufacturer to submit for evaluation
Field Enforcement Role in Field Enforcement Role in Type ApprovalType Approval
Field Enforcement Role in Field Enforcement Role in Type ApprovalType Approval
Use the certificate to determine if device meets approval
Certificate gives detailed information to verify compliance
Review software components by checking the version number
Type Approval CertificateType Approval CertificateType Approval CertificateType Approval Certificate
Applicant Information
Description of features and options
Type of device & model
Certificate Number
Type Approval CertificateType Approval CertificateType Approval CertificateType Approval Certificate
The certificate also has the following informationThe certificate also has the following information
Application (type of service the device is intended for)
Identification (identification badge location)
Sealing (identifies what type of sealing method and location of sealing)
Operation (special operating procedures the device may have)
Test conditions (type of testing that was conducted and associated components that were involved in the testing)
Type evaluation criteria used (code of regulations version that was used as the basis for compliance)
Tested by (the name of the CTEP individual that conducted the testing or evaluation)
Type Evaluation vs Field EnforcementType Evaluation vs Field EnforcementType Evaluation vs Field EnforcementType Evaluation vs Field Enforcement
Type Evaluation ensures devices:Type Evaluation ensures devices:
Are accurate
Reliable and
Do not facilitate fraud
Type Evaluation vs Field EnforcementType Evaluation vs Field EnforcementType Evaluation vs Field EnforcementType Evaluation vs Field Enforcement
Field Enforcement ensures devices:Field Enforcement ensures devices:
Comply with the approval
Are accurate
Used as intended
Enforcement for Non-Approved Enforcement for Non-Approved DevicesDevices
Enforcement for Non-Approved Enforcement for Non-Approved DevicesDevices
The official has twoThe official has twooptions for handling aoptions for handling anon-approved device:non-approved device:
Seizure
Mark it as “Unapproved Device”
Enforcement for Non-Approved Enforcement for Non-Approved DevicesDevices
Enforcement for Non-Approved Enforcement for Non-Approved DevicesDevices
If not brought into compliance within 30 days, device may be seized
Notify the manufacturer regarding the need for evaluation
Notify your device area specialist or CTEP staff
CTEP may issue a temporary use permit
Once CTEP is involved, further field enforcement is usually unnecessary
SummarySummarySummarySummary
Understanding what type approval is Understanding what type approval is
Know how type evaluation is processedKnow how type evaluation is processed
Know the right course of actionKnow the right course of action
Confidence in the procedural aspectConfidence in the procedural aspect
ConclusionConclusionConclusionConclusion
This training module has been designed to help you gain an understanding of the Type Evaluation Program, the organizations involved, and your role in the process.
TRAINING FOR THETRAINING FOR THEWEIGHTS AND MEASURES OFFICIALWEIGHTS AND MEASURES OFFICIAL
This Concludes Module 8This Concludes Module 8“Device Type Evaluation”“Device Type Evaluation”This Concludes Module 8This Concludes Module 8“Device Type Evaluation”“Device Type Evaluation”