PTO Form (Rev 4/2000)

OMB No. 0651-.... (Exp. 08/31/2004)

Request for Reconsideration after Final Action

The table below presents the data as entered.Input Field Entered

SERIAL NUMBER 77788382

LAW OFFICEASSIGNED

LAW OFFICE 110

MARK SECTION (no change)

ARGUMENT(S)

Applicant's mark and the registered mark are not likely to be confused given the differences in theservices and the marks themselves. Applicant hereby incorporates the arguments made previously in itsMarch 18, 2010 response to office action.

FURTHERMORE, Applicant and registrant have entered into a consent agreement whereby Registrantagrees that the marks are not likely to be confused and registrant consent to registration of theApplicant's mark.  See attached Consent Agreement at Paragraph 10.

Wherefore, Applicant requests the Examining Attorney withdraw the refusal and approve the mark forpublication.

EVIDENCE SECTION

        EVIDENCE FILE NAME(S)

       ORIGINAL PDF FILE evi_69173799-083703442_._GOLOOKONAGREEMENT_Fully_Signed.pdf

       CONVERTED PDFFILE(S)

       (3 pages)\\TICRS\EXPORT11\IMAGEOUT11\777\883\77788382\xml1\RFR0002.JPG

        \\TICRS\EXPORT11\IMAGEOUT11\777\883\77788382\xml1\RFR0003.JPG

        \\TICRS\EXPORT11\IMAGEOUT11\777\883\77788382\xml1\RFR0004.JPG

DESCRIPTION OFEVIDENCE FILE Consent Agreement between Applicant and the cited Registrant.

SIGNATURE SECTION

RESPONSE SIGNATURE /ErikMPelton/

SIGNATORY'S NAME Erik M. Pelton

SIGNATORY'S

POSITIONAttorney of Record; NJ, DC Bar Member

DATE SIGNED 10/08/2010

AUTHORIZED

SIGNATORYYES

CONCURRENT APPEAL

NOTICE FILEDNO

FILING INFORMATION SECTION

SUBMIT DATE Fri Oct 08 08:42:21 EDT 2010

TEAS STAMP

USPTO/RFR-69.17.37.99-20101008084221285443-77788382-470641b3e9ab4a2c68da06d66a834735d88-N/A-N/A-20101008083703442198

PTO Form (Rev 4/2000)

OMB No. 0651-.... (Exp. 08/31/2004)

Request for Reconsideration after Final ActionTo the Commissioner for Trademarks:

Application serial no. 77788382 has been amended as follows:

ARGUMENT(S)In response to the substantive refusal(s), please note the following:

Applicant's mark and the registered mark are not likely to be confused given the differences in theservices and the marks themselves. Applicant hereby incorporates the arguments made previously in itsMarch 18, 2010 response to office action.

FURTHERMORE, Applicant and registrant have entered into a consent agreement whereby Registrantagrees that the marks are not likely to be confused and registrant consent to registration of the Applicant'smark.  See attached Consent Agreement at Paragraph 10.

Wherefore, Applicant requests the Examining Attorney withdraw the refusal and approve the mark forpublication.

EVIDENCEEvidence in the nature of Consent Agreement between Applicant and the cited Registrant. has been

attached.Original PDF file:evi_69173799-083703442_._GOLOOKONAGREEMENT_Fully_Signed.pdfConverted PDF file(s) (3 pages)Evidence-1Evidence-2Evidence-3

SIGNATURE(S)Request for Reconsideration SignatureSignature: /ErikMPelton/     Date: 10/08/2010Signatory's Name: Erik M. PeltonSignatory's Position: Attorney of Record; NJ, DC Bar Member

The signatory has confirmed that he/she is an attorney who is a member in good standing of the bar of thehighest court of a U.S. state, which includes the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and other federalterritories and possessions; and he/she is currently the applicant's attorney or an associate thereof; and tothe best of his/her knowledge, if prior to his/her appointment another U.S. attorney or a Canadianattorney/agent not currently associated with his/her company/firm previously represented the applicant inthis matter: (1) the applicant has filed or is concurrently filing a signed revocation of or substitute powerof attorney with the USPTO; (2) the USPTO has granted the request of the prior representative towithdraw; (3) the applicant has filed a power of attorney appointing him/her in this matter; or (4) theapplicant's appointed U.S. attorney or Canadian attorney/agent has filed a power of attorney appointinghim/her as an associate attorney in this matter.

The applicant is not filing a Notice of Appeal in conjunction with this Request for Reconsideration.

        

Serial Number: 77788382Internet Transmission Date: Fri Oct 08 08:42:21 EDT 2010TEAS Stamp: USPTO/RFR-69.17.37.99-20101008084221285443-77788382-470641b3e9ab4a2c68da06d66a834735d88-N/A-N/A-20101008083703442198