8/7/2019 Tracts e 013 the Big Bang Theory Big Bang or Big
Bluff
2/2
3.26 Solar Shrinkage. The origin of Sun-energy appears to be
solar shrinkage, and notnuclear fusion. That is exactly the
opposite ofthat which Evolutionary Theory teaches. Star-evolution
depends on the premise that stars arefuelled by
hydrogen-explosions, while they mayactually be fuelled by solar
shrinkage instead:The Sun has been contracting about 0.1% per
century ...corresponding to a shrinkage rate of about 5 feet per
hour.(G.B. Lublihn, 'Physics Today', Vol.32, No.17 1979).
3.27 Too Few Neutrinos. The Earth is beingbombarded by
hopelessly too few sub-atomicneutrinos to support the Big Bang
Theory.
3.28 Motion In Space. Some stars/star-systems/planets rotate
and/or orbit in theopposite direction of others. The Big BangTheory
cannot explain this phenomenonsatisfactorily. There are also stars
moving toorapidly for the Big BangTheory to be true.
3.29 Comets. The life-cycle of comets is 10 000 years ... if the
Solar System were really5 billion years old, why are so many comets
stillhanging around in our airspace?
3.29 Angular Momentum From A LinearExplosion? Some scientists
believe that theentire Universe is rotating around a commoncentre
by means of rotation/spin (angular)momentum ... and that does not
fit the Big BangTheory that relies on linear momentum as aresult of
an explosion from a common centre.
There is no mechanical way in which theintricate, complex orbits
and circular motions ofgalaxies, spherical star-clusters, stars,
solarsystems, planets and moons could have emergedfrom linear
momentum as a result of anexplosion from a common centre. The Big
BangTheory is too simplistic to explain the wonder ofCreation! Some
perspectives on the REDSHIFT:
BIG BANG-Red Shift: It is unlikely that thistheory('Expanding
Universe Speedshift Theory')could be valid, as it relies on a
Universe thatoriginated from linear momentum culminatingfrom an
explosion from a common centre ... atheory hopelessly too
simplistic to explain theintricate and complex movements and motion
of
heavenly bodies in the Universe. The structureand dynamics of
the Universe is too sophisticatedfor the Big Bang Theory to be
true. TheExpanding Universe, Big Bang Red Shift('Expanding Universe
Speed Redshift') Theory isunlikely because (a) Almost all the
galaxies andstars are observed as red shifts, which may ratherbe
caused by the Second Order Doppler Red Shift(Light observed at an
angle of 90). Some starsand galaxies close to Earth are moving in
thedirection ofEarth, but are nevertheless observedas red shifts
(instead of blue shifts). (b) If theBig Bang Theory were true,
galaxies and starswould have been observed moving away from acommon
centre (where the Big Bang started)
theoretical time to form the heavier elements inexistence
today.
3.17 No Population III-Stars. There are noPopulation III stars
(containing only hydrogenand helium) in existence ... a prerequiste
for theBig Bang Theory. (Isaac Asimov, 'Asimov's New Guide To
Science',pp.35-36 -1984).
3.18 Order Out Of Chaos? Random explosions(by coincidence) do
not give rise to complex,scientifically calibrated orbits for
heavenlybodies. How could it have caused the complica-ted movements
of galaxies, star-clusters, stars,binary stars, suns, solar
systems, planets andmoons?
3.19 Binary Systems. More than half of theobservable stars in
space are contained withinbinary systems where two (or more) stars
circleeach other in perfectly calibrated orbits ... howdid it
happen?
3.20 Too Few Supernova Explosions. There aretoo
fewsupernova-explosions by stars in space tohave formed the heavier
elements in theUniverse. If the Universe were really15 billionyears
old, there would have been many moresupernova-explosions in space.
Supernovas thatare observed do not shed enough matterto
formadditional stars. Supernovas, according toevolutionists the
fuel-source for all the elementsin the Universe, do not occur ofter
enough andproduce too few heavier elements to explain all
the heavier elements occurring in the Universe. 3.21 No
Star-Explosions? Why have star-explosions suddenly stopped?
According toevolutionists it stopped 5 billion years ago ...why?
Why do we not observe stars exploding atdistances ofe.g.15 billion
lightyears away? If theBig Bang Theorywere true,we would have
beenable to still observe many more stars exploding inspace. An
exploding starwill anyway never formanother star.
3.22 Farthest And Closest Stars? Many of thefarthest stars in
the Universe (close to thebeginning of 'Big Bang-Time') are not
exploding,yet they contain some of the heavier elements.According
to Big Bang Theory the farthest starsought to be the oldest stars,
and the closest stars
the youngest, but research has shown that thereare no
significant differences between thefarthests stars and the closest
stars.
3.23 Older And Younger Stars. So-called 'olderstars' do not
contain more of the heavierelements than do so-called 'younger
stars'.
3.24 Extra Galactic Gasses. Extra-galacticgasses contain a
variety of heavier elements,which is contary to the Big Bang Theory
thatgasses in interstellar space contain onlyhydrogen and
helium.
3.25 Stars & Gas. The Universe is filled withlots ofstars
and little gas. If theBig Bang Theorywere true, the Universe would
have been full ofgas with few stars.
instead of away from planet Earth. (c) Evidenceexists for
'photons' that sometimes reduce speedor that may be losing
momentum, which makesthe options of the Gravity- and Energy-Loss
RedShifts feasible. (d) Quasars with a red shift ofbetween 200% and
300%, as well as shiftsbetween 300% and 400%, suggests that the
BigBang Theory is highly unlikely, as this wouldmean that some of
these quasars are moving atvelocities exceeding (one of them as
much as 8times) ...the velocity of light.
GRAVITY-Red Shift: The Gravity Redshiftrefers to the possible
influence that gravity may
be exercising on lightwaves/lightrays in space.Einstein has
proved experimentally that gravitymay influence and bend lightrays
in space, whichmay give rise to a redshift. The mass of light atthe
surface of the Earth (PS. Light, not Air) is e.g.90 kg. per 2,6
km.(Isaac Asimov, 'Asimov's Book Of Facts', p.330- 1979)and gravity
can thus be expected to exert aninfluence on lightrays in the
Universe.
SECOND-ORDER DOPPLER-Redshift: Alight-ray moving at a right
angle [90]in relationto an observer will also cause a red shift.
Thatcould for instance happen if the entire Universewas slowly
rotating around a common centre.Many of the movements of heavenly
bodies in theUniverse are observed at a right angle [90] in
relation to us. ENERGY LOSS (TIRED LIGHT) - Red Shift:Lightrays
may sometimes be losing energy(momentum) over the astronomical
distances ithas to travel in space. That may explain thereason
stars farthest from us are demonstratingthe most dramatic red
shifts.4. THE St. PETER-EQUATION.Roger L. St. Peter's complicated
mathematicalequation showed that the (theorised) Big Bangcould not
have exploded outward into hydrogenand helium. The theoretical
explosion (if at allpossible) would have fallen back on itself
to
create a (theoretical) blackhole, not a Universe.
I doubt if there is any single individual within thescientific
community who could cope with the full rangeof (creationist)
arguments without the help of an army of
consultants in special fields.
(David M. Raup, 'Geology And Creation', Bulletin Of The Field
Museum OfNatural History, Vol.54, p.18 March 1983).
I have little hesitation in saying that a sickly pallnow hangs
over the Big Bang Theory.
(Sir Fred Hoyle,'The Big Bang Theory Under Attack', Science
Digest, p.84 -May 1984).
The'BIG BANG'
Theory
Big BANG Or Big PUFF?
Why are you laughing? All I said was,'Swirling pools of gas
clouds made our
Solar System and our planet'. And, ifsomehow I could find a way
to glue gastogether, it would prove the Big BangTheory correct!
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Sources & Illustration: Vance Ferrell BA, MA,BD: 'Science
vs. Evolution', &'The Evolution
Handbook', Evolution Facts Inc. (2001)
P.J. Stassen 2007
EvangelismRSAP.O. Box/Posbus 14492 Sinoville 0129 Pretoria
RSA
Cell/Sel 072 237 5793
Contact Us For Our Pamphlet OnHow To Print And Distribute
TheseChristian Tracts From Home.
mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]
