8/7/2019 TRACTS E 009 FOURTEEN STEPS for Evolutionists to Prove the Christian Creationists Wrong

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/tracts-e-009-fourteen-steps-for-evolutionists-to-prove-the-christian-creationists 1/2

 

lity Theory teaches that with passing time thechances for success diminish, they do notimprove. Any seasoned gambler will confirmthis nasty phenomenon. At the 1966 WistarSymposium in the USA the mathematiciansarticulated this fact to the evolutionists, but they would not listen. Vance Ferrell BA., MA., BD.Writes: “The point is that TIME can never work in favour of something that cannot happen. Can TIME change rocksinto badgers; seawater into turkeys; sand into fishes? CanTIME discver human hormones; manufacture the telescopiceye of the eagle; or arrange for the Moon to orbit the Earth?The truth is that, the longer the TIME, the greater thechances for decay , and the less the chances that Evolutionwill take place.” (Vance Ferrell BA, MA, BD: 'Science vs. Evolution' ,

p.162).

  4.3 Micro Evolution? Changes within species,such as breeding a new kind of dog (so-called'Micro Evolution' ), is not Evolution at all, butonly variation upon a theme, or diversity withinbasic categories. Both the parents of that new breed were still dogs. Ever saw a dog beingborn from a non-dog; or a finch from a non-finch; or a moth from a non-moth?  Arrangefor a practical demonstration of evolution acrossmajor species (in spite of DNA-constraints) andyou will have refuted the laws governing DNAand proven the Christians wrong.

5. REFUTE THE PRINCIPLES OFIRREDUCIBLE, IMMEDIATE AND SPECIFICCOMPLEXITY. 

5.1  Irreducible, Immediate and SpecificComplexity. These principles make Evolutiontotally unfeasible and defunct theory. Theseprinciples mean that living organisms destinedfor a specific life-purpose have to be fully formed immediately in order to function effectively,survive and make it a viable species. For instance:  (a) Baby -Whales. How long could baby-whaleshave afforded to wait until mother-whales haddeveloped a oneway-, non-return valve (nipple)for baby-whales to drink from (under water) tosurvive and grow during infancy ... if it had had todepend on Evolution for over 'millions of years'?Where did the mother-whale come from, anyway,and how did she survive in the first place, withoutthat facility 'from the beginning'?

(b) Bloodclotting? Imagine a living organism(animal) trying to 'evolve' over many 'millions of 

years'. Surely   all that individual's organs(physiologically speaking) will 'evolve' paralleland in harmony with the rest of its body until'maturity of species' is reached ... how long couldthat little animal have afforded to wait (inaccordance with Evolution) for its blood te learnto clot ... 100 000 years; 500 000 years? Musn'tblood clot  (coagulate) immediately (withinminutes) to guarantee the survival of the species?

 

(c) Male & Female. Think about the mysteriesof the sexes ... male and female. If Evolution hadto invent (against mathematical  odds) themiracle of Life, remember that it will have had toperform a double miracle: Two Mirror Organisms, Male & Female! ... and it will havehad to function perfectly instantly! 

5.2 Evolution A Useless 'Science'. Evolution istruly a useless, pseudo-science, and surely it hasdelayed the progress of the (genuine) NaturalSciences for at least 150 years! Be honest ... wasa thorough working knowledge of Evolutionary Theory a prerequisite for the invention ordiscovery of for instance electricity; thetelephone (including fax machines andcellphones); the telegraph; radio; TV ;computers; the automobile; rockets; satellitesetc.? 

5.3 Commonsense Is Not Common. Use yourcommonsense: (a) Can a paper-airplane (0moving parts) fold itself? (NO!);  (b) Can anordinary mousetrap (5 moving parts) makeitself? (NO!); (c) Can the flagellum of thebacterium (40 moving parts) make itself? (NO!).(d) Could this Universe witheverything/everybody in it (mega-zillions of moving parts) have manufactured itself? (Areyou KIDDING?). 

5.4 The Law Of Creatorship.  'The Law Of Creatorship' states that the maker of a product isalways itself of necessity  more complex/moreintelligent  than that particular product . Well,this Universe is a mighty complex place (just look at 'The Electro-Magnetic Spectrum'  or the'Periodic Table Of Elements' ) so the Beingoriginally responsible for its origins andinvention surely must 'have been' (surely IS)infinitely more complex and intelligent than theProduct  itself (the Universe).   Arrange for apractical demonstration where a paper airplane,an ordinary mousetrap and a laptop computer make themselves and you will have proven theChristians wrong. 

6. EXPLAIN THE MYSTERY OF THEPOLONIUM 218-RADIO HALO IN GRANITES.

6.1 Earth From Molten Granite? The researchof  geo-physicist, Robert V. Gentry, indicates thatthe foundation-stone of the Earth (granite)contains microscopically small bubbles calledPolonium-218 Radio Halos, Worldwide. TheseHalos could have originated (formed) in one wayonly ... if the granites itself  coagulated (clotted)within 3 minutes after formation, and not asmolten lava over many 'millions of years', asEvolutionists teach. In other words, if PlanetEarth were really '4,6 - 5 billion years' old, these

Death and you will have refuted The Second LawOf Thermodynamics and proven the Christianswrong.

3. REFUTE THE FINDINGS ON MENDELIANGENETICS.

3.1 Biogénesis.  It means that only a Living Cell can give rise to another Living Cell ! Life cannotmagically 'evolve' from Non-Life.

3.2 Carl Von Linne (Carl Linnaus: 1707-1778).He invented the classification-system of plantsand animals used as a standard today, and cameto two definite conclusions: (a) Species were, forthe most part, the equivalent of the 'GénesisKind'  and (b) There had been no change (ever)across the basic categories. Linnaus firmly believed in the fixity of species and Special Creation.

3.3 Classification Refutes Evolution. The very fact that the animal- and plant-kingdoms can beclassified and categorised at all (i.e. kingdom,phylum, class, order, family, genus, species, sub-species) proves Special Creation and disprovesEvolution. Evolution teaches that animals andplants are in 'constant flux'  (continuously 'evolving'), so there should be no distinct, fixedspecies in Nature at all. Yet, everywhere onelooks (including to the Fossil Record ), only 

distinct , fixed species are observed (Stasis). Produce a Living Cell  from a non-living cell and you will have refuted Mendelian Geneticsand proved the Christians wrong.

4. REFUTE THE FINDINGS ON DNA.

4.1 DNA's Amazing 'Firewall'. Scientists willtestify that no across-species Evolution had evertaken place across the basic categories of animalsand plants ('Macro Evolution' ). A built-insecurity system ('firewall') prohibits this fromever taking place. The complicated DNA-codewithin each plant- and animal-type erects thegreat firewall which cannot be crossed ... anotherof the many forbidden zones in Nature.

4.2 What Do The Mathematicians Say? There isno evidence that at any time, in all the history of the World, that even one new true species hasformed from another species. The chances aremathematically so remote as to prove utterlyimpossible, as was confirmed by many reputablemathematicians during the Wistar Symposium inthe USA in 1966. Any mathematician acquaintedwith Probability Theory will tell you that longer ages may actually make Evolution, over extended periods, with the odds increasingly andcumulatively stacked against it, only increasinglymore unlikely. More time would actually compound the evolutionist's problem. Probabi-

1. REFUTE THE FIRST LAW OFTHERMODYNAMICS.

1.1 Matter And Energy Cannot Be Created OrDestroyed. The first is to refute  'The First LawOf Thermodynamics', a Law respected andacknowledged as non-negotiable by all reputablescientists. This Law states that Matter & Energy(sister-phenomena) cannot be created or destroyed , i.e. nobody can add to or take awayfrom the total portfolio of  Matter  & Energyavailable in the Universe. We may manipulateand harness it, but that's all.  1.2 Something From Nothing? However, if Matter & Energy cannot be created or destroyed,how did Evolution then manage tooverride/abrogate this Law   and  (a) 'Create'Matter & Energy, in the beginning,  as a pre-requisite for Life?  (out of 'available raw materials') and (b) Magically, 'create' that very 'raw materials' out of NOTHING in the firstplace? Well, we believe that it (i) has  never happened  nor (ii)  could it ever happen ... thisarea is one of many  forbidden zones in thePhysics of the Universe. Create Somethingout of  Nothing and you will have refuted TheFirst Law Of Thermodynamics and proven theChristians wrong.

2. REFUTE THE SECOND LAW OF

THERMODYNAMICS.

2.1 The Law Of Decay And Death. This Law,'The Second Law Of Thermodynamics' , statesthat the Universe is running down ... Time'sarrow points downwards. There is a 'Law Of Decay And Death'  at work in Nature, andrandom events like Evolution can never lead toOrder out of Chaos (low entropy), but always toChaos out of Order (high entropy). Ultimately,everything dies or disintegrates and turns todust . We may only  delay the process by greasingand cleaning things. 

2.2  The Evolutionists Have Gambled Away Their Last And Only Stamp. The hopes, dreams

and illusions behind the Evolutionary Theory  arefounded  on the same hopeless mathematical probabilities as the forces driving gambling & betting ... the result, in the long-term, isinvariably  shame, not success. Evolution, if itwere true, will have relied solely on luck.

2.3 The Intelligent First Cause. The Universe(a closed  physical system) is like a huge oldgrandfather-clock winding down ... it too must(eventually) stop ticking, decay and die. But then... Who wound it up in the first place? Thus, thevery existence of  'The Second Law Of Thermodynamics'  demands the existence of anIntelligent First Cause ... a Creator. Defy  

8/7/2019 TRACTS E 009 FOURTEEN STEPS for Evolutionists to Prove the Christian Creationists Wrong

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/tracts-e-009-fourteen-steps-for-evolutionists-to-prove-the-christian-creationists 2/2

Polonium-218 Radio Halos would not have beenpresent in the Planet's granites today. And, if theEarth were really formed out of redhot, moltenlava (granite), then why do geo-physicists findthat, when they melt down granites and allow itto cool back to solids, it never cools back to solidgranite again, but to rhyolite? The granite-from-molten-lava theory over 'millions of years'is unlikely ... if that were truly the case, then ourplanet's foundation-stone today ought to havebeen rhyolite, not granite.

6.3  Where Did The Rumour Come From? How did the rumour that the Earth was '4,6 billionyears' old actually begin? It developed in aridiculous manner:

(a)  Thompson. In 1862, Thompson said theEarth was '20 million years' old.

(b) Thompson. In 1897, Thompson doubled itto '40 million years' .

(c) Joly. In 1899, Joly decided that the Earthwas '90 million years' old.

(d) Raleigh. In 1921, Raleigh said the Earth was'1 billion years' old.

(e) Hotchkiss. In 1932, W.O. Hotchkiss movedthe figure up to '1,6 billion years' .

(f) Holmes. In 1947, A. Holmes declared PlanetEarth to be exactly '3,35 billion years'  old but,

(g) Holmes. In 1956, A. Holmes raised it to '4,5 billion years' .

(h) Today. At present, the so-called age of theEarth stands at a wopping '4,6 - 5 billion years' (Theonly missing link here appears to be a competentpsychiatrist). Keep a close eye on the pro-evolutionist press ... evolution-inflation may force the age of the Earth up yet again. Prove that the foundation-stone of the Earthought not to have been rhyolite instead of graniteand that the Earth is 4,6 billion years old; andyou will have proved the Christians wrong.

7. PRODUCE A TRANSITIONAL FOSSIL.

7.1 Archaeopteryx. The only transitional fossil ever (almost) successfully produced as 'proof' of Evolution, was Archaeopteryx  ... the so-called

transitional  (cross-over) fossil  'proving theEvolutionary link between reptiles and birds'. 

7.2 The Hoax Discovered. However,Archaeopteryx was proved 'a carefully contrivedhoax' in 1985 by six of the most prominentscientists in Britain: Fred Hoyle, R.S. Watkins,N.C. Wickramasinghe, J. Watkins, R. Rabilizirov & L.M. Spencer (British Journal Of Photography, March-June 1985).

 7.3 More References To Verify Hoax. See also:

(a) W.J. Broad, 'Authenticity Of Bird Fossil Is Challenged '  (pp.C1, C14, New

York Times-7 May 1985).  (b) T. Nield, 'Feathers Fly Over Fossil 'Fraud'' 

(New Scientist 1467:49-50) and (c)  G.Vines, 'Strange Case Of 

Archaeopteryx 'Fraud'' (New Scientist 1447:3).

9. PROVE THE EVOLUTIONISTS' THEORY OF'PUNCTUATED EQUILIBRIUM' CORRECT.

(a) Richard Goldschmidt (1878-1958). Heannounced the concept of  'Hopeful Monsters'  in1940 in his book  'The Material Basis Of Evolution'  interms of which he believed in a type of  'mega-evolution' , which means that one lifeformsuddenly and unexpectedly originated fromanother totally different lifeform. One sunny day a fish laid some eggs, and, instead of fishes, frogshatched out!

(b) Gould & Eldredge. This 'Hopeful Monster' circus was almost given true credibility whenStephen J. Gould and Niles Eldredge resuscitatedthe laughable theory in 1972 with the pseudo-scientific term 'punctuated equilibrium' ('Punctuated Equilibria: An Alternative To Phyletic Gradualism' 

– 1972).   Show us an example where a fish laideggs and frogs hatched out instead; or where areptile laid eggs and birds hatched out instead,and you will have proved the Christians wrong.

10. PROVE THE EVOLUTIONISTS' THEORY OF 'THE INHERITANCE OF ACQUIREDCHARACTERISTICS' CORRECT.

10.1 Jean-Baptiste Lamarck (1744-1829). In1809, long before Darwin in his book  Philosophie

Zoologique , he asserted that the giraffe got its longneck from stretching to reach the uppermost

leaves on trees, and that birds got their webbedfeet from negotiating the water in rivers tosurvive.

10.2 You Can Be Taller! According to thisridiculous ideology, one can lengthen one's earsby constantly pulling on it, or lengthen one'sarms by repeatedly reaching for the highest jar inthe kitchen. Be careful to stretch the legs inconcert, otherwise your elbows may startdragging on the ground behind you. Show us an organism (animal or human) that haslengthened its/his arms (in the kitchen) or its/hisneck (at the football) by constant stretching andyou will have proved the Christians wrong.

11. Destroy the BIBLE.

12. Stop the SECOND COMING of Jesus Christ. '

13. Make sure you NEVER DIE. 

14. Don't show up for JUDGMENT. 

Destroy the Bible; Stop the Second Comingof Jesus Christ; Don't Die and Don't show up forJudgment; and you will have proved theChristians wrong.

Grab This LIFELINE!

Isaiah 1:18; John 3:16; 4:13,14; Romans 6:23; 8:1; Hebrews 9:14,15;10:10; 1 John 1:7; Revelation 3:20; 22:17

 

Fourteen Steps For

Evolutionists To Prove The 

Christian-

Creationists Wrong!

  “But Prof., if man descended from the

apes, why do we have a differentnumber of vertebrae in our backbonesthan the apes? And why are the shapeof our spines; our cranial capacity andDNA so different? And when did the'homonids' develop Proca's Convolution... i.e. the ability to speak?”

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

'The Holy Bible' (NIV)

Information, Illustration & Sources assupplied by and quoted in Vance Ferrell

B.A.,M.A.,B.D., 'Science vs. Evolution' and'The Evolution Handbook' , Evolution Facts

Inc. (2001)

© P.J. Stassen 2007

EvangelismRSAP.O. Box/Posbus 14492 Sinoville 0129 Pretoria RSA

Cell/Sel 072 237 5793 Web: m

 

7.4  Who Took The Fossil? Here's the catch ...no  transitional fossil  has ever been found afterthey now had been searching for one for over a100 years! Out of the 100 million (perhaps many more) catalogued fossil-specimens in collectionsthe World over, not one is an example of atransitional fossil . Out of  billions of  fossilsprobably still lying buried in the rich Karoo-Formation, not one transitional fossil has ever been unearthed there so far. The JOKE:  If Evolution were true, there would have beenbillions of these transitional-fossils lying in andaround the hills and koppies of South Africa! Produce a transitional (intermediary) fossil as evidence for evolution across major speciesand you will have proven the Christians wrong.

8. PRODUCE THE GEOLOGIC TIME SCALEEXACTLY AS DEPICTED IN EVOLUTIONIST'SCHARTS.

8.1 The 'Geologic Column'. Show us the so-called 'Geologic Column'  of sedimentary strata(Cenozoic, Mesozoic, Paleozoic etc.)  exactly asdepicted in your charts. Take us to a place wherewe can observe as first-hand empirical evidence across-section of the Column, complete with itssub-strata ('Periods') of  Quaternary & Tertiary(Cenozoic  : 'Recent Life  '); Cretaceous, Jurassic & Triassic  (Mesozoic  : 'Medieval Life'  ); Permian,

Pennsylvanian, Mississippian, Devonian,Silurian, Ordovician, & Cambrian  (Paleozoic  : 'Ancient Life'), plus the Pre-Cambrian (Void).

8.2  Evolutionists Are Facing InsurmountableObstacles. The Evolutionists' problems aremanifold and they argue a lot, e.g.: (a) They regularly entertain ongoing strata-controversiesamongst  themselves! (b) They have  mixed-upfossils in the strata! (c) They have 'reworking' &'downwash'  of fossils in and out of strata!(d) They have pollen and spores in the CambrianPeriod of strata! (It should not be there). (e) They have the skipping of the strata by fossils! (f) They have mixed-up  strata!  (g) They have missingstrata!

8.3 Evolution Or A Biblical Flood? VanceFerrell B.A., M.A., B.D. writes:

  “How can it be that the Geologic Column is so incomplete,when Evolutionary Theory teaches that it was quietly,slowly laid down uniformly over millions of years? The truthis that the rock strata point us back to a terrible Worldwidecatastrophe ... a Flood

, and not to millions of years of gradual soil deposits from dead plants and windblown soil.”('Science vs Evolution' , p.486 – Evolution Facts Inc. 2001). 

  Take us to vertical cross-section of theGeologic Column exactly as depicted in yourtextbooks and wall-charts and you will haveproved the Christians wrong.

Contact Us For Our Pamphlet OnHow To Print And Distribute These

Christian Tracts From Home.