10
Track 2 Final Presentation 26 Aug 11

Track 2 Final Presentation 26 Aug 11. Track 2 Deliverable Develop outline supporting Track 1 concept of operations for multinational military support

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Track 2 Final Presentation 26 Aug 11. Track 2 Deliverable Develop outline supporting Track 1 concept of operations for multinational military support

Track 2Final Presentation

26 Aug 11

Page 2: Track 2 Final Presentation 26 Aug 11. Track 2 Deliverable Develop outline supporting Track 1 concept of operations for multinational military support

Track 2 Deliverable

• Develop outline supporting Track 1 concept of operations for multinational military support to GOM (in response to a disaster)– Completed task based on MNF SOP-suggested

format from HADR extract

Page 3: Track 2 Final Presentation 26 Aug 11. Track 2 Deliverable Develop outline supporting Track 1 concept of operations for multinational military support

Purpose, Method, Endstate

• Purpose: Assisting State militaries synergize to support GOM and International Community disaster relief operations.

• Method: Assisting State militaries support disaster relief efforts as directed by national chains of command. MAF hosts an MNCC to enable Assisting State military coordination. Assisting State military representatives also participate in NEMA (co-hosted) Clusters to consult and cooperate with GOM Ministries and the International Humanitarian Community.

• Endstate: GOM effectively responding to crisis requirements, in cooperation with the International Humanitarian Community.

Page 4: Track 2 Final Presentation 26 Aug 11. Track 2 Deliverable Develop outline supporting Track 1 concept of operations for multinational military support

Concept of Support

• Phase 1: Immediate Response/Life Saving• Phase 2: Capacity Surge Support/Relief

Activities• Phase 3: Disengagement/Repatriation

Page 5: Track 2 Final Presentation 26 Aug 11. Track 2 Deliverable Develop outline supporting Track 1 concept of operations for multinational military support

ProposedRequest for Assistance (RFA) Process

• NEMA is GOM’s single operational-level authority that approves RFAs, prioritizes RFAs and matches RFAs within GOM, IHC or Assisting State capabilities. – For RFAs requiring Assisting State involvement, NEMA may seek

higher-level approval through State Emergency Commission.• RFAs may originate at any level and should follow a standard

format, as prescribed by NEMA.• Primary responsibility to handle RFAs remains with GOM. If

GOM and IHC resources are exhausted, Assisting State militaries provide military unique capabilities as a last resort.

• Assisting State militaries shall respond to RFAs assigned by NEMA and approved through national command channels.

Page 6: Track 2 Final Presentation 26 Aug 11. Track 2 Deliverable Develop outline supporting Track 1 concept of operations for multinational military support

Assumptions• GOM considers Bilateral Agreements (esp for diplomatic clearance

of overflight / access rights).• GOM policy regarding Rules of [Engagement / Employment].• GOM establishes policy regarding entry visa requirements, customs,

and legal aspects on Assisting State forces. • GOM rules/restrictions on licensed professionals (eg. doctors).• Assisting State relief operations in Mongolia are logistically self-

sustaining until crisis response transitions from life saving to relief.• Assisting State disengagement occurs on a state-by-state or bilateral

basis.

Page 7: Track 2 Final Presentation 26 Aug 11. Track 2 Deliverable Develop outline supporting Track 1 concept of operations for multinational military support

Key Tasks

• Identify main staging location for use by Assisting State militaries • Establish MNCC• Emphasize GOM lead and international community support as a

major strategic communication theme.• Conduct life saving and relief activities as requested by the GOM

or IHC and as directed by national chains of command.• Disengage from military relief activities in a supportive fashion

that allows continued recovery and reconstruction operations by the GOM and humanitarian community with minimal adverse impact.

• Repatriate forces to home station

Page 8: Track 2 Final Presentation 26 Aug 11. Track 2 Deliverable Develop outline supporting Track 1 concept of operations for multinational military support

Field Teams

Co-hostedClusters

UN Res/Human. Coordinator

AS MilForces

AS TaskForce HQsMNCC

NGOsIOs

Others

Gov of Mongolia

Assisting StatesUnited NationsHumanitarian Community

(Less UN Agencies)

MAF ChiefOf Army

State EmgcyCommission

MilitaryForces

NEMA-L(Local-level)

Military SubWkg Group

NEMA/EOC(Working Gp)

AS SeniorMilitary Comdrs

Embassies /Diplomatic Offices

CommandCoordination

Consult/Cooperation

Human. Ctry Tm

Page 9: Track 2 Final Presentation 26 Aug 11. Track 2 Deliverable Develop outline supporting Track 1 concept of operations for multinational military support

Summary

• Takeaways:– NEMA is GOM’s single operational-level authority

for RFAs– MNCC conducts mil-to-mil coordination in support

of NEMA and IHC/Cluster requirements• Recommended Next Step:– Build on Track 2 outline and develop more complete

guidance for integrating Assisting State military support into GOM “whole of government” crisis response.

Page 10: Track 2 Final Presentation 26 Aug 11. Track 2 Deliverable Develop outline supporting Track 1 concept of operations for multinational military support

Berni

e(Fa

cilita

tor)

Dean(USAF)

Nishantha

(Sri Lankan Army) Lim(Malaysian Air Force)

Vivek(Indian Army)

John(Papua New Guinea DF)

Ibbe(Maldivian Army)Bal Krishan(Nepalese Army)

Aries(Indonesian Navy)Masato(Japanese Navy)Ebihara

(Japanese Air Force) Vutha

(Combodian Air Force)

Urakami

(Japan Ground SDF)

Ulzii

(Mongolian Army)

Naagii(Mongolian Army)

Enkhee

(Mongolian Army)

Ganzo(Mongolian Army)

Sadat

(Bangladesh Air Force)

Kurogi

(Japanese Air Force)