Upload
nguyenthuy
View
221
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Traceability as a Component in Bio-Security Systems
Mechel S. PaggiDirector, Center for Agricultural Business
California State University, Fresno
Cal-Med Sonoma WorkshopMarket Organization, Resources and Finance in Mediterranean Crops
October 24 – 26, 2007
What do I Mean ByBiosecurity Systems
Networks and Concepts
Policy Environment : Public/Private StandardsTraceability Component
How does compliance with industry standards and government regulations affect industry operations,
costs & returns?
Where Do We Need More Work?
Biosecurity Systems are Designed to AddressConcerns About
Food Safety Food Security
Protection AgainstUnintentional Events Protection Against Intentional
EventsInspection, Monitoring, Control
TraceabilitySystems
Field to the Fork
Processing, Package, Cook
Storage and Aggregation
Transport, Delivery
Grow Crops, AnimalsMonitor Quality, Safety
Oversee Markets Handle Waste, Environment
Manage, Train Labor
Adopt TechnologyTransit and Analyze Data and Information
Science, Research& Development
Finance & Credit
Food Distribution Network
* Adapted from Jean KinseyUniversity of Minnesota
ConsumptionConsumption
Networks Give Rise to Safety and Security Concerns
What happens to the merchandise during transportation by truck, container, rail, or boat?
During transportation a number of events can create both security and health hazards:
1. Sabotage / Terrorism2. Change in temperature
How is the product produced? What chemicals are used in the process? How is the water? Etc.
At Any Given Time60% of the World’s Population
Is Awake
And Some of Them Are Up to No Good
Mantra of Homeland Security
Foodborne Illness Raises Consumer Awareness& Creates Business Concerns
Some Cases that Got Our Attention
• 1996: Escherichia coli O157:H7 California lettuce
•1996: Cyclospora parasite in Guatemalan raspberries(originally reported as originating in California strawberries by
the Texas Department of Health) The California Strawberry Commission estimated that this false alarm led to $16 million in lost revenue to
growers in the central coast of California
• 1997: Hepatitis A in Mexican Strawberries
• 2000, 2001, 2002: Salmonella, Mexican cantaloupes
•2003: Hepatitis A in Mexican Green Onions
• More Recently Leafy Green Ecoli from California Spinach
New Products, In New PackagesIn New Places: More Dependence on Food Safety
And Security Provided by Others
***
* Ken McCorkle
3843 46 51
0102030405060
% o
f Foo
d P
urch
ases
1976 1986 1996 2006
Expenditures on Food Away From Home
%% % %?
Source: USDA/ERS
Sales Net Grocery Net Grocery Sales Company ($ billion) Sales ($ billion) Rank
Concentration in GLOBAL FOOD RETAILERS
Wal-Mart U.S. 244.52 83.14 1
Carrefour/Promodès France 64.77 45.34 3Ahold Holland 59.27 49.78 2
Kroger U.S. 51.76 43.48 4Metro Germany/Switz. 48.56 24.28 11
Target U.S. 43.92 7.47 27Tesco U.K. 39.52 28.46 8
Costco U.S. 37.99 23.18 12Source: R.Cook, 2002
According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, an estimated 76 million cases of food-borne disease occur each year in the US, resulting in 325,000 hospitalizations and 5,000 deaths annually.
WHAT IS CIES - THE FOOD BUSINESS FORUM?
CIES - The Food Business Forum is the only independent global food business network.
It serves the CEOs and senior management of nearly 400 members, in over 150 countries, with retailers being the largest single group. Providing a platform for knowledge-exchange, thought-leadership and networking, CIES has been growing with the food business for over 50 years. Its strength lies in the active commitment of its member companies and its privileged access to key industry players which allows the organization to facilitate the development of common positions and tools on key strategic and practical issues affecting the food business.
1953 – CIES was founded on 24th June 1953 at a congress held by international retail association AIDA in Belgium. The objective was to create a body to represent food retail chains, which at that time had no association of their own, unlike cooperatives and voluntary groups. The new association was named Comité International d’Entreprises à Succursales (CIES – International Committee of Food Retail Chains) and was headed by Henry Toulouse, founder of AIDA and Chairman of the regional food store chain Docks de France.
CIES retailer members alone generate over $2,000 billion, employ 4.5 million people and operate close to 600,000 stores representing a total sales area of 160 million square meters.
On the 20th June 2007 – Roger Corbett, Chairman of CIES - The Food Business Forum announced to over 1100 senior executives at the CIES Annual World Food Business Summit in Shanghai, PR. China, that retailers have reached a landmark agreement on food safety schemes.
Under the umbrella of the Global Food Safety Initiative (GFSI), 7 major retailers have come to a common acceptance of the four GFSI benchmarked food safety schemes:
• BRC - British Retail Consortium Global Food Standard • IFS – International Food Standard • SQF 2000 – Safe Quality Food Scheme • Dutch HACCP Scheme (Option B)
Each scheme has now aligned itself with common criteria defined by food safety experts from the food business, with the objective of making food manufacture as safe as possible. As a result, this will also drive cost efficiency in the supply chain and reduce the duplication of audits.
The GFSI vision of ‘once certified, accepted everywhere’ has now become a reality. Carrefour, Tesco, Metro, Migros, Ahold, Wal-Mart and Delhaize have agreed to reduce duplication in the supply chain through the common acceptance of any of the four GFSI benchmarked schemes.
September, 07 : Eurepgap goes globalIn 10 years the voluntary organization establishing
Good Agricultural Practices mutually agreed upon by multipleRetailers in Europe and their suppliers spread to identical critera adoptionIn South and Central America, Africa, Australia, Japan and Thialand in the
Formation of schemes such as ChileGAP, ChinaGAP, KenyaGAP, MexicoGAPJGAP (Japan) and most recently ThaiGAP.
Currently Global GAP covers 80,000 producers in 80 countries
Field systems to provide data for trace back capabilities
Modern satellite systems allow transport companies to see where trucks, containers and boats are, what is their
speed, the inside temperature and changes in temperature etc.
Based on set parameters instant alerts can be given on a variety of events, such as (but not limited to):
• truck unscheduled stops / starts • tethering / un - tethering trailer
• unacceptable change in temperature• trailer / container opened
• foreign gasses in trailer / container
Modern Trace/Track Systems
At each control point in the farm,the pack house, the trucks, the containers, the repackaging centre,the Retailer DC, lot numbers andbar codes are created linking all Traceability information to the very beginning
SUPPLIERCentral
TraceabilityDatabase
Pack House 1
Pack House 2
RETAILREPACKING
RETAIL DISTRIBUTION
CENTER
Tenerife Port
CadizPort
Store 1
Store 950
Store 267
Tracing Fruit & Vegetablesfrom farms to supermarkets
RETAILERCentral
TraceabilityDatabase
Farm 1
Farm 376
Farm 2763
Farm 4499
TraceAbility PartnersSupply Chain Integrators
Goods Flow
Information FlowManual label
XML
XML
XML
XML
XML
XML
XML
XML
Tracing Processed FoodPasta Example
Salt receiving
Pepper receiving
Flour receiving
Eggs receiving
Salt plantCuracao
PepperIndia
Flour MillBelgium
Egg FarmBelgium
Importer/Retailer DC
Store 78Store 1
Store 190 Store n
Physical flow
Traceability flow
***
*
*
** * *
Transfer to
Process Hall
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
* External control pointvia XML
* Internal control pointplant
TraceAbility PartnersSupply Chain Integrators
Each * is a control point and generates a traceabilitylot number tracing back to the beginning
PlantTraceability
Database
PlantAdmin
Database
Salinas Valley Lettuce HarvestTraceability in Practice
Chinese Carrot Harvest
But Not All Systems are GlobalGAP
The Quality Line : Real Quality and Value Image
Taste:Propose good tasting productsabove market standard
Food safety:Contribute to the human
health and food safetyfor the consumer by applying the precautionand prevention principle.No GMOControl the food chain:
from the field to theplate (guide line, control plan and traceability)
Quality/Price:Guarantee the best andstable quality products withan accessible priceRetribute producers accordingto their work
Authenticity:Preserve and promote theagricultural heritageLook for the best originEncourage andSupportRegions and Countries where Carrefour ispresented
Permanence:Preserve thesocial, economical andecologicalenvironment
QL project in Carrefour China
FujiVegBJ
VegSH
Pork DL Beef SH
Litchi99.06
Pomelo02.09
Mandarin02.12
Salmon03.03
Pork03.06(SH)
Pork04.11(BJ)
Pork05.05
(South )Signed Product
7 product
Orange Pork DL Beef SHProduct in trial
( launching in store )
6 product
Project in development
8 product
VegGZ
VegShZ
Shrimp PorkCD
PorkKM
PorkShYang
BeefBJ
KIWI
How does compliance with industry standards and government regulations affect industry operations,
costs & returns?
While certification to GlobalGAP will result in additional costs to growers, there will be numerous benefits. Long-term benefits include more motivated farm workers due to improved facilities, training and better working conditions with a subsequent increase in living standards. This would obviously also result in better productivity and outputs to the ultimate benefit for the grower.
• For Texas citrus operation Documentation and auditing preparation for Primus Lab/GAP (Good Agricultural Practices) and EUROGAP, aswell as fruit residue and irrigation water testing, cost the grower $2.11 per acre, out of $963 cultural costs. (5400 acres of citrus)
• For California lettuce operation: $1.50 per acre, 3200 acres, $1090 cultural costs.
•
Cost of Compliance
Table 9.3 Activities/Costs Attributed to Regulatory Compliance - Arizona Lettuce
Food SafetyHours Rate Fee or Additional CostsTotal CostCost / Acre
Primus Lab Cossts - Ranch Inspection $3,000 3,000 $0.94 - Harvest Crew Inspections $125/crew $625 $0.19Time in documentation/audit preperati35 hrs./year 34/hr. $1,190 $0.37
$1.50
Cost of Compliance
* Food security has become a greater concern over the past five years, and the grower has implemented an employee identification program to help ensure that no one is in the fields or packing houses who isn’t supposed to be there. The employees wear photo IDs, and the farmsupervisors have copies of the picture IDs of the employees. The grower spent $4,000 on the initial system, which comes to $2.56 per acre.
• Arizona Lettuce operation, 1,563 acres, $1748 per acre cultural costs
Table 9.3 Activities/Costs Attributed to Regulatory Compliance - Arizona Lettuce
Food SafetyHours Rate Fee or Additional Costs Total Cos Cost / Acre
Documentation/preperation for aud10 hrs. week $50.00 h $50 per year $14.,050 $8.90Employee Food Safety Training 10 hrs. month $50.00 h $200 per year $3,700 $2.36Maintaining Food Safety Program 30 hrs. month $50.00 hr. $10,050 $6.72
$17.98
** Hamilton CISSC Study, 2006.
In Morocco, the EUREPGAP standard is being widely implemented at the farm level on medium -sized and large-sized farms. the estimated costs to comply with
EUREPGAP for a medium-sized tomato farm managing 10 ha with a workforce of 60 people were altogether US$71,000; that is about 8% of the production costs per
ha and equivalently 3% of the FOB value of the farm’s exports.
Affirmed by a number of interviewed farmers and packing house managers, compliance with multiple standards, namely EUREPGAP and BRC, is the most
serious problem, particularly for smaller-scale farmers, leading to higher compliance costs because they cannot economize on scale .
Frohberg, Grote and Winter Paper at the 2006 IAAE
Anecdotal Evidence
• Monterrey Producer: about 20 cents a carton, 5%
• Environmental costs: removal of buffer strips from creek area to make less inviting for wildlife habitat, previously established as wildlife habitat enhancement
Costs
Benefits
• Watermelon producer Arkansas, Texas & Mexico
Not providing certification of compliance with GlobalGAPlimited access to super/hyper markets. Providing certificationpayment of accounts receivable in 10 days rather than 30 - 60on $1 million + sales.