30
TOWARDS NEW BITUMEN TOWARDS NEW BITUMEN SPECIFICATIONS SPECIFICATIONS RPF – 8/9 MAY 2012 RPF – 8/9 MAY 2012 Dennis Rossmann Dennis Rossmann

TOWARDS NEW BITUMEN SPECIFICATIONS RPF – 8/9 MAY 2012 Dennis Rossmann

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: TOWARDS NEW BITUMEN SPECIFICATIONS RPF – 8/9 MAY 2012 Dennis Rossmann

TOWARDS NEW BITUMEN TOWARDS NEW BITUMEN SPECIFICATIONSSPECIFICATIONS

RPF – 8/9 MAY 2012RPF – 8/9 MAY 2012

Dennis RossmannDennis Rossmann

Page 2: TOWARDS NEW BITUMEN SPECIFICATIONS RPF – 8/9 MAY 2012 Dennis Rossmann

New - Improved ”Midnight”?? New - Improved ”Midnight”?? (circa 1922)(circa 1922)

Page 3: TOWARDS NEW BITUMEN SPECIFICATIONS RPF – 8/9 MAY 2012 Dennis Rossmann

Aka CROSSING THE Aka CROSSING THE RUBICONRUBICON

RPF – 8/9 MAY 2012RPF – 8/9 MAY 2012

Dennis RossmannDennis Rossmann

Page 4: TOWARDS NEW BITUMEN SPECIFICATIONS RPF – 8/9 MAY 2012 Dennis Rossmann

The Rubicon?The Rubicon?

Page 5: TOWARDS NEW BITUMEN SPECIFICATIONS RPF – 8/9 MAY 2012 Dennis Rossmann

Crossing the Rubicon?Crossing the Rubicon?

The idiom - “Crossing the Rubicon” – means The idiom - “Crossing the Rubicon” – means to pass a point of no return and refers to to pass a point of no return and refers to Julius Caesar’s army crossing of the river in Julius Caesar’s army crossing of the river in 49 BC, which was considered an act of 49 BC, which was considered an act of insurrection! insurrection!

Page 6: TOWARDS NEW BITUMEN SPECIFICATIONS RPF – 8/9 MAY 2012 Dennis Rossmann

BITUMEN!BITUMEN!

• Black and stickyBlack and sticky• Originally a “residue” (or naturally occuring)?Originally a “residue” (or naturally occuring)?• Now a “manufactured “ product? Now a “manufactured “ product?

Page 7: TOWARDS NEW BITUMEN SPECIFICATIONS RPF – 8/9 MAY 2012 Dennis Rossmann

ChallengesChallenges

Current specs do not guarantee Current specs do not guarantee performanceperformance

Availability of local bitumen erraticAvailability of local bitumen erraticChanges in crude sources due to Changes in crude sources due to

“international sanctions” “international sanctions” Need for supplementary imports (at a cost Need for supplementary imports (at a cost

premium) premium)

Page 8: TOWARDS NEW BITUMEN SPECIFICATIONS RPF – 8/9 MAY 2012 Dennis Rossmann

Roles & Responsibilities of various parties in Roles & Responsibilities of various parties in providing road infrastructureproviding road infrastructure

Client - Identification (a plan)Client - Identification (a plan)Consultant/contractor- (the midwife - birth)Consultant/contractor- (the midwife - birth)Client – (the foster parent- for life)Client – (the foster parent- for life)

Page 9: TOWARDS NEW BITUMEN SPECIFICATIONS RPF – 8/9 MAY 2012 Dennis Rossmann

New SANS SpecificationNew SANS Specification

SANS 307 ---- SANS 4001 BT1 (Pen)SANS 307 ---- SANS 4001 BT1 (Pen)SANS 308 ---- SANS 4001 BT2 (cutback)SANS 308 ---- SANS 4001 BT2 (cutback)

Page 10: TOWARDS NEW BITUMEN SPECIFICATIONS RPF – 8/9 MAY 2012 Dennis Rossmann

Changes in Penetration LimitsChanges in Penetration Limits

EN ISO 4259 – Determination and EN ISO 4259 – Determination and application of precision data in relation to application of precision data in relation to methods of test methods of test

Reproducibility published by EN 1427 Reproducibility published by EN 1427 much better than that published by ASTMmuch better than that published by ASTM

Thus EN norm being followedThus EN norm being followed

Page 11: TOWARDS NEW BITUMEN SPECIFICATIONS RPF – 8/9 MAY 2012 Dennis Rossmann

Penetration RequirementsPenetration RequirementsSANS 307 SANS 4001 BT1

40 - 50 35 - 50

60 - 70 50 - 70

80 - 100 70 - 100

150 - 200 150 - 200

Page 12: TOWARDS NEW BITUMEN SPECIFICATIONS RPF – 8/9 MAY 2012 Dennis Rossmann

Viscosity RequirementsViscosity Requirements

Viscosity @ 60°c - removal of upper limit Viscosity @ 60°c - removal of upper limit (submitted but not yet published)(submitted but not yet published)

Page 13: TOWARDS NEW BITUMEN SPECIFICATIONS RPF – 8/9 MAY 2012 Dennis Rossmann

Viscosity RequirementsViscosity Requirements

Viscosity @ 60°c - removal of upper limit Viscosity @ 60°c - removal of upper limit

Viscosity @ 135°c - unchangedViscosity @ 135°c - unchanged

Page 14: TOWARDS NEW BITUMEN SPECIFICATIONS RPF – 8/9 MAY 2012 Dennis Rossmann

Viscosity RequirementsViscosity Requirements

Viscosity @ 60°c - removal of upper limitViscosity @ 60°c - removal of upper limitViscosity @ 135°c – unchangedViscosity @ 135°c – unchanged

Introduction of Dynamic Viscosity Introduction of Dynamic Viscosity (Brookfield) to broaden field testing. (Brookfield) to broaden field testing. Kinematic viscosity remains “Mandatory” Kinematic viscosity remains “Mandatory” valuevalue

Page 15: TOWARDS NEW BITUMEN SPECIFICATIONS RPF – 8/9 MAY 2012 Dennis Rossmann

Bitumen Durability Bitumen Durability RequirementsRequirements

Page 16: TOWARDS NEW BITUMEN SPECIFICATIONS RPF – 8/9 MAY 2012 Dennis Rossmann

Durability PropertiesDurability Properties

RTFOT – indication of short term ageing RTFOT – indication of short term ageing (manufacture/application)!(manufacture/application)!

Long term ageing?Long term ageing?

Page 17: TOWARDS NEW BITUMEN SPECIFICATIONS RPF – 8/9 MAY 2012 Dennis Rossmann

Bitumen Durability Bitumen Durability

Research projects underway!Research projects underway!• Extended RTFOT Extended RTFOT (problem with modified binders?)(problem with modified binders?)

• PAVPAV• Requirements for HMA/surface seal Requirements for HMA/surface seal

applicationsapplications• Assessment of Europe RCAT method Assessment of Europe RCAT method

optionoption

Page 18: TOWARDS NEW BITUMEN SPECIFICATIONS RPF – 8/9 MAY 2012 Dennis Rossmann

Durability Prediction!Durability Prediction!

Where to next Dr Spock”?Where to next Dr Spock”?

Page 19: TOWARDS NEW BITUMEN SPECIFICATIONS RPF – 8/9 MAY 2012 Dennis Rossmann

Durability RequirementsDurability Requirements

SANRAL has decided to follow the PAV SANRAL has decided to follow the PAV route (after RTFOT conditioning)route (after RTFOT conditioning)

Page 20: TOWARDS NEW BITUMEN SPECIFICATIONS RPF – 8/9 MAY 2012 Dennis Rossmann

Performance Grade Performance Grade SpecificationsSpecifications

Page 21: TOWARDS NEW BITUMEN SPECIFICATIONS RPF – 8/9 MAY 2012 Dennis Rossmann

Performance Grade Performance Grade SpecificationsSpecifications

Current spec has no link to “performance”!Current spec has no link to “performance”!

Page 22: TOWARDS NEW BITUMEN SPECIFICATIONS RPF – 8/9 MAY 2012 Dennis Rossmann

Performance Grade Performance Grade SpecificationsSpecifications

Current spec has no link to “performance”!Current spec has no link to “performance”! In order to link with SAPDM – we have to In order to link with SAPDM – we have to

go the DSR route!!go the DSR route!!SANRAL has made the decision to follow SANRAL has made the decision to follow

this route!!!!!!!this route!!!!!!!

Page 23: TOWARDS NEW BITUMEN SPECIFICATIONS RPF – 8/9 MAY 2012 Dennis Rossmann

Performance Grade Performance Grade SpecificationsSpecifications

Current spec has no link to “performance”!Current spec has no link to “performance”! In order to link with SAPDM – we have to In order to link with SAPDM – we have to

go the DSR route!!!go the DSR route!!!

Page 24: TOWARDS NEW BITUMEN SPECIFICATIONS RPF – 8/9 MAY 2012 Dennis Rossmann

Bitumen SpecificationBitumen Specification

The option of having interim “dual” specs: The option of having interim “dual” specs: i.e “industrial grade bitumen” and i.e “industrial grade bitumen” and “performance grade” currently being “performance grade” currently being considered.considered.

Page 25: TOWARDS NEW BITUMEN SPECIFICATIONS RPF – 8/9 MAY 2012 Dennis Rossmann

Cost of new testing equipmentCost of new testing equipment

Can we afford NOT to invest in more Can we afford NOT to invest in more accurate performance prediction accurate performance prediction methods?methods?

Page 26: TOWARDS NEW BITUMEN SPECIFICATIONS RPF – 8/9 MAY 2012 Dennis Rossmann

ConclusionsConclusions

Are we taking the right route?Are we taking the right route?

Page 27: TOWARDS NEW BITUMEN SPECIFICATIONS RPF – 8/9 MAY 2012 Dennis Rossmann

CONCLUSIONSCONCLUSIONS

Revised specs more in line with international Revised specs more in line with international normsnorms

Limits linked to test reproducibility realitiesLimits linked to test reproducibility realities SANRAL has decided to follow the PG spec SANRAL has decided to follow the PG spec

routeroute

Page 28: TOWARDS NEW BITUMEN SPECIFICATIONS RPF – 8/9 MAY 2012 Dennis Rossmann

ConclusionConclusionCrossing the Rubicon!Crossing the Rubicon!

Caesar undecided! The term has survived to Caesar undecided! The term has survived to refer to any individual or group committing refer to any individual or group committing itself to a risky or revolutionary course of itself to a risky or revolutionary course of action i.e passing the point of no return!action i.e passing the point of no return!

Page 29: TOWARDS NEW BITUMEN SPECIFICATIONS RPF – 8/9 MAY 2012 Dennis Rossmann

SA - 1985SA - 1985

Page 30: TOWARDS NEW BITUMEN SPECIFICATIONS RPF – 8/9 MAY 2012 Dennis Rossmann

THANK YOUTHANK YOU