3
The Alberta Journal of Educational Research Vol. XLV. No. 4, Winter 1999,468-470 Diana L. Gustafson Ontario Institute for Studies in Education and Institute for Women's Studies and Gender Studies, University of Toronto Toward Inclusionary Practices in the Education of Nurses: A Critique of Transcultural Nursing Theory For over a decade research that addresses inclusive education has examined the social organization of knowledge (Alcoff & Potter, 1993; Campbell & Manicom, 1995; Harding, 1992, Smith, 1987, 1990a, 1990b, 1996), access to educational institutions and programs (Blackmore & Kenway, 1993; Reynolds & Young, 1995), curricular reform (Gaskell & McLaren, 1991; Gaskell, McLaren, & Novogrodsky, 1989), chilly classroom climates (Chilly Collective, 1995; Sandler, Silverberg, & Hall, 1996), and strategies for teaching and learning (Acker, 1994; Briskin, 1991; Dei, 1996a, 1996b; Lather, 1991; Manicom, 1992; McCormick, 1994). Feminists and critical theorists concerned with advancing the agenda of inclusive education speak about how women and other mar- ginalized groups affect and are affected by exclusionary practices in education. Underlying this research is an assumption that how we come to know (or not know) ourselves is discoverable in and mediated by institutional texts, images, policies, and structural processes. That is to say, dominant educational know- ledge systems organize how we construct ourselves and others as gendered and male or female, racialized and white or black, straight or gay, able-bodied or disabled, valued or disrespected, powerful or powerless. Generally, stu- dents and faculty who see themselves and their values, beliefs, and interests represented and protected in institutional knowledges feel included and powerful. Conversely, students and faculty who do not see themselves repre- sented in institutionalized knowledges generally feel excluded and oppressed in and by the educational system. The primary purpose of this research is to extend the dialogue about in- clusive education into nursing education by engaging in the first anti-racist critique of transcultural nursing theory (TCN). Drawing on the works of Dei (1996a, 1996b), Fine, Weis, Powell, and Wong, (1997), Fine and Wise (1993), Frankenberg (1993,1997), McCarthy and Crichlow (1993), and others I examine how T C N embodies, imparts, and reinforces the dominant social discourses (values, beliefs, language, and political interests) about race, ethnicity, culture, and racism and organizes the everyday lives of white and minoritized nursing students and faculty. Specifically, this research addresses three questions: (a) What are the explicit and implicit definitions of race, ethnicity, culture, and racism constructed in transcultural nursing theory? (b) How, if at all, do nurs- Diana Gustafson is a dual-enrolled doctoral student whose research interests include health care reform and its impact on Canadian women. She can be reached at [email protected] or SESE - 12th floor, OISE/University of Toronto, 252 Bloor St W, Toronto O N M5S 1V6. 468

Toward Inclusionary Practices in the Education of Nurses

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    3

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

The Alberta Journal of Educational Research Vol. XLV. No. 4, Winter 1999,468-470

Diana L. Gustafson Ontario Institute for Studies in Education

and Institute for Women's Studies and Gender Studies, University of Toronto

Toward Inclusionary Practices in the Education of Nurses: A Critique of Transcultural Nursing Theory F o r o v e r a d e c a d e research that addresses i n c l u s i v e e d u c a t i o n has e x a m i n e d the s o c i a l o r g a n i z a t i o n of k n o w l e d g e ( A l c o f f & Potter , 1993; C a m p b e l l & M a n i c o m , 1995; H a r d i n g , 1992, S m i t h , 1987, 1990a, 1990b, 1996), access to e d u c a t i o n a l i n s t i t u t i o n s a n d p r o g r a m s (B lackmore & K e n w a y , 1993; R e y n o l d s & Y o u n g , 1995), c u r r i c u l a r r e f o r m ( G a s k e l l & M c L a r e n , 1991; G a s k e l l , M c L a r e n , & N o v o g r o d s k y , 1989), c h i l l y c l a s s r o o m c l imates ( C h i l l y C o l l e c t i v e , 1995; S a n d l e r , S i l v e r b e r g , & H a l l , 1996), a n d strategies for teaching a n d l e a r n i n g ( A c k e r , 1994; B r i s k i n , 1991; D e i , 1996a, 1996b; L a t h e r , 1991; M a n i c o m , 1992; M c C o r m i c k , 1994). F e m i n i s t s a n d cr i t i ca l theorists concerned w i t h a d v a n c i n g the a g e n d a of i n c l u s i v e e d u c a t i o n speak about h o w w o m e n a n d other m a r ­g i n a l i z e d g r o u p s affect a n d are affected b y e x c l u s i o n a r y practices i n e d u c a t i o n . U n d e r l y i n g this research is a n a s s u m p t i o n that h o w w e c o m e to k n o w (or not k n o w ) o u r s e l v e s is d i s c o v e r a b l e i n a n d m e d i a t e d b y i n s t i t u t i o n a l texts, images , p o l i c i e s , a n d s t r u c t u r a l processes. That is to say, d o m i n a n t e d u c a t i o n a l k n o w ­ledge sys tems o r g a n i z e h o w w e construct ourse lves a n d others as g e n d e r e d a n d m a l e o r female , r a c i a l i z e d a n d w h i t e or b lack , s tra ight o r gay , a b l e - b o d i e d or d i s a b l e d , v a l u e d or d isrespected , p o w e r f u l o r p o w e r l e s s . G e n e r a l l y , s t u ­dents a n d facu l ty w h o see themselves a n d their va lues , beliefs , a n d interests represented a n d protec ted i n ins t i tu t iona l k n o w l e d g e s feel i n c l u d e d a n d p o w e r f u l . C o n v e r s e l y , s tudents a n d facul ty w h o d o not see themselves repre­sented i n i n s t i t u t i o n a l i z e d k n o w l e d g e s genera l ly feel e x c l u d e d a n d o p p r e s s e d i n a n d b y the e d u c a t i o n a l s y s t e m .

T h e p r i m a r y p u r p o s e of this research is to extend the d i a l o g u e about i n ­c l u s i v e e d u c a t i o n i n t o n u r s i n g e d u c a t i o n b y e n g a g i n g i n the first anti-racist c r i t i q u e of t r a n s c u l t u r a l n u r s i n g theory ( T C N ) . D r a w i n g o n the w o r k s of D e i (1996a, 1996b), F i n e , W e i s , P o w e l l , a n d W o n g , (1997), F ine a n d W i s e (1993), F r a n k e n b e r g (1993,1997), M c C a r t h y a n d C r i c h l o w (1993), a n d others I e x a m i n e h o w T C N e m b o d i e s , i m p a r t s , a n d reinforces the d o m i n a n t socia l d iscourses (values , bel iefs , l a n g u a g e , a n d p o l i t i c a l interests) about race, e thnic i ty , cu l ture , a n d r a c i s m a n d o r g a n i z e s the e v e r y d a y l ives of w h i t e a n d m i n o r i t i z e d n u r s i n g s tudents a n d facu l ty . Spec i f i ca l ly , this research addresses three quest ions : (a) W h a t are the e x p l i c i t a n d i m p l i c i t de f in i t ions of race, e thnic i ty , c u l ture , a n d r a c i s m c o n s t r u c t e d i n t r a n s c u l t u r a l n u r s i n g theory? (b) H o w , if at a l l , d o n u r s -

Diana Gustafson is a dual-enrolled doctoral student whose research interests include health care reform and its impact on Canadian women. She can be reached at [email protected] or SESE - 12th floor, OISE/University of Toronto, 252 Bloor St W, Toronto O N M5S 1V6.

468

Toward Inclusionary Practices

i n g s tudents a n d facul ty take u p or chal lenge these w a y s of t h i n k i n g about race, e thn ic i ty , c u l t u r e , a n d rac i sm? (c) W h a t c o m m o n g r o u n d , if a n y , u n d e r l i e s the p r i n c i p l e s a n d practices of t r a n s c u l t u r a l n u r s i n g e d u c a t i o n a n d ant i - rac i sm e d u c a t i o n as p e d a g o g i c a l approaches to soc ia l di f ference a n d rac ia l o p p r e s ­s ion?

O n e i m p e t u s for this research arises f r o m m y interest i n c o m p l i c a t i n g n u r s e s ' l o c a t i o n as a female s u b o r d i n a t e i n hea l th care b y l o o k i n g at h o w other p o w e r re lat ions o r g a n i z e the e d u c a t i o n a l p r e p a r a t i o n of nurses a n d , i n t u r n , o r g a n i z e n u r s i n g pract ice . I n d o i n g this research I a m also t a k i n g u p the cha l l enge to e x a m i n e the u n e a r n e d benefits a n d p r i v i l e g e s that accrue to m e as •a w h i t e e d u c a t o r i n a r a c i a l i z e d e d u c a t i o n a l s y s t e m . If k n o w l e d g e is a c o n d u i t for p o w e r t h e n I m u s t c r i t i c a l l y e x a m i n e h o w I ques t ion , use, a n d g i v e a u t h o r ­i ty to k n o w l e d g e i n m y teach ing pract ice a n d i n m y w r i t i n g . These foc i c o m ­b i n e d w i t h the ear ly outcomes of s o m e p r e l i m i n a r y w o r k p r o d u c e d a second a n d p a r a l l e l p u r p o s e .

In the ear ly stages of this research I e x a m i n e d c u l t u r a l sens i t iv i ty as a n o r g a n i z i n g p r i n c i p l e i n the n u r s i n g c u r r i c u l u m at a n O n t a r i o c o m m u n i t y c o l ­lege ( G u s t a f s o n , 1998). C u l t u r a l sens i t iv i ty , a core theme of t ranscu l tura l n u r s ­i n g t h e o r y ( K o z i e r , E r b , B ia i s , & W i l k i n s o n , 1995) w a s a d o p t e d b y the n u r s i n g facu l ty i n the m i d 1980s as a response to i n c r e a s i n g c u l t u r a l d i v e r s i t y i n the c o m m u n i t y a n d s tudent p o p u l a t i o n s . I a r g u e d that c u l t u r a l sens i t iv i ty is a l i b e r a l response to race relat ions that organizes a n d reproduces whi teness a n d w h i t e r a c i a l i d e n t i t y as a d o m i n a n t , centered, absent presence i n n u r s i n g texts. S h i l l i n g (1993) f irst u s e d the phrase "absent presence" (p. 19) to refer to the status of the b o d y i n s o c i o l o g i c a l theory , b u t the t e r m is appl i cab le to construc­t ions of whi teness a n d w h i t e rac ia l i d e n t i t y i n n u r s i n g texts. Whi teness a n d w h i t e r a c i a l i d e n t i t y are absent i n the sense that they l ie outs ide the legi t imate concerns of n u r s i n g e d u c a t i o n a n d t h e o r i z i n g . A t the same t ime , whi teness a n d w h i t e r a c i a l i d e n t i t y are present i n the sense that they are at the centre of a n d " n o u r i s h " (p. 19) the i d e o l o g y a n d s y s t e m of r a c i s m .

T h e prac t i ca l issue that arose f r o m that p r e l i m i n a r y w o r k w a s p e d a g o g i c a l : H o w does one facil i tate the process of m a k i n g the i n v i s i b l e v i s i b l e to w h i t e s tudents a n d facu l ty w h o h a v e l earned not to see it? I c o n c l u d e d that this requires a " c o n t r a p u n t a l r e a d i n g of the text" or a consc ious effort to " r e a d against the g r a i n . " T o facil i tate this c r i t i ca l exercise, I a m generat ing a n d w i l l test a n i n s t r u m e n t that s u p p o r t s n u r s i n g facul ty a n d students i n r e c o g n i z i n g a n d e x a m i n i n g u n p r o b l e m a t i z e d a s s u m p t i o n s a n d beliefs about c u l t u r a l d i v e r ­s i ty a n d soc ia l di f ference . T h e structure a n d f o r m a t of the i n s t r u m e n t d r a w s o n the w o r k s of E i c h l e r (1991,1997) a n d E i c h l e r , G u s t a f s o n , a n d P o m p e t z k i (1999) w h o d e v e l o p e d a set of d iagnost i c quest ions for r e c o g n i z i n g s e x i s m i n research. T h i s i n s t r u m e n t for r e c o g n i z i n g overt a n d h i d d e n forms of r a c i s m is b e i n g f o r m u l a t e d so that it m a y be a p p l i c a b l e to other texts b e y o n d n u r s i n g .

Acknowledgments I am grateful to the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council for their support of this research. M y thanks to Margrit Eichler and George Dei for their comments on this article and for our ongoing conversations.

References Acker, S. (1994). Gendered education: Sociological reflections on women, teaching and feminism.

Toronto, O N : OISE Press.

469

D . i . Gustafson

Aleoff, L., & Potter, E. (Eds.). (1993). Feminist epistemologies. New York: Routledge. Blackmore, }., & Kenway, J. (Eds.). (1993). Gender matters in education administration and policy: A

feminist introduction. Washington, DC: Falmer Press. Briskin, L. (1991). Feminist pedagogy: Teaching and learning liberation. Feminist perspectives. Ottawa:

Canadian Research Institute for the Advancement of Women (CRIAW). Campbell, M . , & Manicom, A. (Eds.). (1995). Knowledge, experience and ruling relations: Studies in

the social organization of knowledge. Toronto, O N : University of Toronto Press. Chilly Collective. (Eds.). (1995). Breaking anonymity: The chilly climate for women faculty. Waterloo,

O N : Wilfred Laurier University Press. Dei, G.J.S. (1996a). Anti-racism education: Theory and practice. Halifax, NS: Femwood. Dei, G.J.S. (1996b). Critical perspectives in antiracism: An introduction. Canadian Revieiv of

Sociology and Anthropology, 33,247-269. Eichler, M . (1991). Non-sexist research methods: A practical method. New York: Routledge. Eichler, M . (1997). Feminist methodology. Current Sociology, 45(2), 9-37. Fichier, M . , Gustafson, D.L., & Pompetzki, M . (1999). Moving toward equality: Recognizing and

eliminating gender bias in health. Ottawa: Health Canada. Fine, M . , & Wise, L. (Eds.). 1993). Beyond silenced voices: Class, race, and gender in United States

schools. Albany, NY: SUNY Press. Fine, M . , Weis, L., Powell, L.C., & Wong, L.M. (1997). Off white: Readings on race, power and society.

New York: Routledge. Frankenberg, R. (1993). The social construction ofivhiteness: White women, race matters. Minneapolis,

M N : University of Minnesota Press. Frankenberg, R. (Ed.). (1997). Displacing whiteness: Essays in social and cultural criticism. Durham,

N C : Duke University Press. Gaskell, J., & McLaren, A. (Eds.). (1991). Women and education: A Canadian perspective (2nd ed.).

Calgary, AB: Detselig. Gaskell, J., McLaren, A., & Novogrodsky, M . (Eds.). (1989). Claiming an education: Feminism and

Canadian schools. Toronto, O N : Garamond Press. Gustafson, D.L. (1998, June). Problematizing cultural sensitivity as a thematic in the nursing

curriculum at an Ontario college. In J.R. Epp (Ed.), Centering on the margins: The evaded curriculum (pp. 261-270). The Second Bi-Annual Canadian Association for the Study of Women and Education (CASWE) International Institute Proceedings, University of Ottawa.

Harding, S. (1992). Rethinking standpoint epistemology: What is "Strong Objectivity?" Centennial Review, 36,437-70.

Kozier, B., Erb, G , Biais, K., & Wilkinson, J. M . (Eds.). (1995). Fundamentals of nursing: Concepts, process, and practice (5th ed.). Don Mills, O N : Addison-Wesley.

Lather, P. (1991). Getting smart: Feminist research and pedagogy with/in the postmodern. New York: Routledge.

Manicom, A. (1992). Feminist pedagogy: Transformations, standpoints, and politics. Canadian Journal of Education, 17,365-389.

McCarthy, C., & Crichlow, W. (Eds.). (1993). Race, identity, and representation in education. New York: Routledge.

McCormick, T. (1994). Creating the nonsexist classroom: A multicultural approach. New York: Teachers College Press.

Reynolds, C , & Young, B. (Eds.). (1995). Women and leadership in Canadian education. Calgary, AB: Detselig.

Sandler, B.R., Silverberg, L.A., & Hall, R.M. (1996). The chilly classroom climate: A guide to improve the education of women. Washington, DC: National Association for Women in Education.

Shilling, C. (1993). The body and social theory. London: Sage. Smith, D.E. (1987). The everyday ivorld as problematic: A feminist sociology. Toronto, O N : University

of Toronto Press. Smith, D.E. (1990a). The conceptual practices of power: A feminist sociology of knoxoledge. Toronto, O N :

University of Toronto Press. Smith, D.E. (1990b). Te.vfs,/flcfs and femininity: Exploring the relations of ruling. London: Routledge. Smith, D.E. (1996). The relations of ruling: A feminist inquiry. Studies in Cultures, Organizations

and Societies, 2(1), 171-190.

470