t~~~~OQ - Arkansas · 2019. 7. 25. · Printed Name: Cecm be f Th QIY\r S'Ofl Date: 1}'l-'-1/t4 SP-19-0104 Prospective Contractor Name: Central Bidding Col.C Col. D Col. E Col. F

$Page 1: t~~~~OQ - Arkansas · 2019. 7. 25. · Printed Name: Cecm be f Th QIY\r S'Ofl Date: 1}'l-'-1/t4 SP-19-0104 Prospective Contractor Name: Central Bidding Col.C Col. D Col. E Col. F$
I

I ,,·

Evaluation Summary Score Sheet - Final Post Demo

Bid No: SP-19-0104

Description: Electronic Bidding Solution

Agency: Public Agencies as defined by Act 1075

-- , - .,

f.lrverag,edJW~ig11tectl1i~ctfoic-a1i ,\Zen1f orr 1N~me, 1 ~ -1 _!l?rro,pos·~1rsc_:or:e~ ____,J

Bonfire 373.33 Central Bidding 353.33

Cobblestone Software 278.33 Ion Wave Technologies, Inc. 433.33

LSI Consulting 256.67 MTX Group, Inc. 165.00

Periscope Holdings, Inc. 0.00 Sysoft 216.67

'.'~t~~~~OQ Date: 'T-z_y ·Jl cq

•

r , ,v.er~ve}'Wei~hte~ ."' · li>emonstcatiQrnSc.Pr.e, 1 [ iiotali.S'core.

460.00 833.33 280.00 633.33

NA 278.33 420.00 853.33

NA 256.67 NA 165.00 NA 0.00 NA 216.67

Weighted Score Sheet SP-19-0104 Prospective Contractor Name: Bonfire

Col.A Col. B Col.C Col. D Col. E Col. F

Averaged Raw Raw Points Percentage of Weighted I

Points from Possible Possible Raw Points

Criteria Consensus (5 pts. per Points Possible I Weighted Score Sheet Question) Received (Out of 700) Points Scored

E.1 I 3.831 51 770/o 50 38.33

E.2

E.3

E.4 116.00

E.5 I 4.17 5 830/o 100 83.33

E.6 I 3.33 5 670/o 100 66.67

Demonstration I 4.60 5 92% 500 460.00

TOTAL SCORE! 373.33!

SignaureC~ !l{o'J~ Printed Name: (:l\ VV'\ ½A' f 1\t\o(Y"\~ )SoV1

Date: , ['L-'-\ { l "J 1

Consensus Score Sheet - Initial

Koy for Assignment of Points:

SP-19-0104 Electronic Bidding Solution Prospective Contractor Name: Bonfire

0 = Unacceptable 1 = Poor 2 = Marginal 3 = Acceptable 4 = Good 5 = Excellent

Average of Raw Polntl for

Criteria CT I AY I OP JP LM MJ Category ~

EJ<p•rieneo (E. 1 Questions I - 3)

E.1 4 I 4 3 4 4 4 U3

Provious Projects (E.2 Question 1)

E.2 4 I 3 3 3 4 4 :uo

Lil;gation (Nor Scored) (E.3 Question 1)

E.3

Understanding and Approach to Requirements (E.4 Quest.ions 1 • 3)

E.4 4 I 4 I 3 I 4 I 4 I 4 I !.!! Securiry, Implementation, and Contracting (E.5 Questions 1 • 3)

E.5 4 I 4 I 4 I 4 I 4 I 5 I ~

E .6 !Fee Slrucrure (E.6 Oucslioo I)

Demonstration

3

I 3

I 3

I 3

I 4

I 4

I U3

4 5 4 5 5 4.80

Prin5 ame < P!Vl M.

M~="d -"t ~ Aootge42 ¥c.~L) Le<; M c~~~h

Q,tlVV\ \?:€. r tb PIY'\)$()/1

Weighted Score Sheet

Col.A Col. 8

Averaged Raw Points from Consensus

Criteria Score Sheet

E.1 4.00

E.2

E.3

E.4 3.67

E.5 3.33

E.6 3.33

Demonstration 2.80

Signaure c~ J k~ Printed Name: Cecm be f Th QIY\r S'Ofl

Date: 1 }'l-'-1/t4

SP-19-0104 Prospective Contractor Name: Central Bidding

Col.C Col. D Col. E Col. F

Raw Points Percentage of Weighted I

Possible Possible Raw Points (5 pts. per Points Possible I Weighted Question) Received (Out of 700) Points Scored

5 80% 50 40.00

5 73% 150 110.00

5 67% 100 66.67

5 67% 100 66.67

5 56% 500 280.00


Key for Assignment of Points:

SP-19-0104 Electronic Bidding Solution Prospective Contractor Name: Central Bidding

O = Unacceptab!e 1 = Poor 2 = Marginal 3 = Acceptable 4 = Good 5 = Exceaent

Criteria

Experience (E.1 Oueslions 1 ~ 3) E.1

Ptevloos Ptojects (E.2 OuesUon 1)

E.2

Li1Jgati0<1 (Not Soc<ed) (E.3 OueSliO<l I )

E.3

UndCI$landing and Approaeh to Requtrcments ce., OucsiJons 1 . 3)

E.4

Sccvritt, lmplemenia1ion, and Contracting (E.!t Oue$lions 1 - 3)

E.5

E.6 IFee Struduro (E.6 Ouestlon 1)

Otmonsuatlon

CT AV DP JP I LM

4 4 4 4 I 4

3 3 I 4

3 3

3 3 3

3 3 3

3 3

Printed Name fL A Q W bww4£ _IVL ~ {Y , ( .A cJ / C ._JO L,s D

~ \o tUL X '11,US i.~~ JJl6c<11~

Q~M\-:z{ c· ::rh(hNJ )$~ I

Aver1ge of R.aw Points for

I MJ I Calegory

--I 4 I ~

I 4 I_______Ml

4 3.17

3 3.33

3.33

2 2.IO



SP-19-0104 Electronic Bidding Solution Prospective Contractor Name: Ion Wave Technologies, Inc.

O = Unacceptable 1 = Poor 2 = Marg:nal 3 = Acceptable 4 = Good 5 = Excellent

Critoria

Experience(E .1 Q uestions 1 - 3)

E.1

Previous Projects (E,2 Question 1)

E.2

Litigation (Nol Scored) (E.3 Oue,1100 1)

E.3

Understanding and Appro.aeh co Rcqultemcnts (E.4 Questions 1 - 3)

E.4

Security, Implementation, and Contracting (E.5 OuesUons t - 3)

E.5

E.6 !Fee SIIUdure (E.6 OueSllon 1)

Demon~tratlon

CT AV DP JP LM

4 4 4

4 4 5

4 5 5

4 4 4 4

4 4 5

4 4

PrintDm~Af e '~ M I ('ffi:c.d ( C -:Jt!-.J\.S' kl/\ I\ b e,y?.. Y 0 -f::u t0-s M c_oc<--<-tJ ~

Ca mb...ec To11me5C¥1

Average or Raw Points for

I MJ Category

-I 5 .!:.!!

I 5 I 4.33

4.IO

5 4.17

5 -~

5 ~

Weighted Score Sheet SP-19-0104 Prospective Contract Name: Ion Wave Technologies, Inc.

Col.A Col. B



E.1 -E.2 -E.3

E.4 4.50

E.5 4.17

E.6 4.33

Demonstration 4.20

Signaure c~( j k rn-Vl--i Printed Name: ~Yv10:f ( TV't~QS'1/1

Date: 1 /?-Uc /I °l

Col.C

Raw Points Possible

(5 pts. per Question)

5

5

5

5

Col. D Col. E Col. F

Percentage of Weighted Possible Raw Points

Points Possible I Weighted Received (Out of 700) Points Scored

90% 150 136.00

83% 100 83.33

87% 100 86.67

84% 500 420.00

TOTAL SCOREI 433.331

Technical Evaluation Summary Score Sheet - Initial Consensus

Bid No: SP-19-0104

Description: Electronic Bidding Solution

Agency: Public Agencies as defined by Act 1075

Vendor Name, Aver~gedl Weig'ht~d l!echh'ical I - . - - ~ E!r-oposaI1, Score

Bonfire 373.33 Central Bidding 353.33

Cobblestone Software 278.33 Ion Wave Technologies, Inc. 433.33

LSI Consulting 256.67 MTX Group, Inc. 165.00

Periscope Holdings, Inc. 0.00 Sysoft 216.67

Signaure: (hA~ ~ Printed Name: J .pc~ Date: 7 ,ho / I g



SP-19-0104 Electronic Bidding Solution Prospective Contractor Name: Bonfire


Aver.ago of R.aw Point, for

Criteria CT I AY I DP I JP I LM I MJ I category

--Experience (E. 1 Questions 1 • 3)

E.1

E.2 Previous Projects (E...2 Question 1)

4 I 4 I 3 I 4 I 4 I 4

I 3.13

4 I 3 I 3 I 3 I 4 I 4

U tigation (Not SGote<I) (E.3 Question 1)

E.3

Understanding and Approach to Requirements (E.4 Questions 1 • 3)

E.4 4 4 3 4 4 4 3.13

Security, Implementation. atld Contracting (E.5 Questions 1 • 3)

E.5 4 4 4 4 4 5 4.17

E .6 I Fee Structure (E 6 Question 1) 3 3 3 3 4 4 3.33

r ted Name

u .M 12-e.r Tu0vnpscV1

b::;e~~ M,c~ 1-~ IY"'I

L c: s M <-G7°' "'st~

~~ k,Ld?- y e, f=e S

Weighted Score Sheet SP-19-0104 Prospective Contractor Name: Bonfire

Col. A Col. B Col. C Col. D Col. E Col. F

Averaged Raw Raw Points Percentage of Points from Possible Possible Raw Weighted

Criteria Consensus (5 pts. per Points Points Possible' Weighted Score Sheet Question) Received (Out of 700) Points Scored

E.1

I 3.~31 51 77%1 501 38.33

E.2 ---·

-E.3

E.4 3.83 5 n% 150 115.00

E.5 4.17 5 83% 100 83.33

E.6 3.33 5 67% 100 66.67

TOTAL SCOREI 373.331

Signaure: l(ibW} 6\~ Printed Name: 0 A1c1/\\:H ( -\}\DQ'.::1\2.SC,<Vl Date:

1 /\ C)~~

Key for Assignment of Points: O = Unacceptable 1 = Poor 2 = Marginal 3 = Acceptable 4 = Good 5 = Excellent

Criteria CT AV DP

Experience (E.1 Oucsti0t1s 1 • 3) E.1 4

Previous Projects (E 2 Question 1) E.2

Litigation (Not Score<!) (E.3 Ouestlon 1)

E.3

Unclcrs.tancUng and Approaeh to Rcquitemcnts (E . .c Oueitlon.s 1 • 3) E.4 4

security. lmplcmentatlon. and Conuactlng (E.S Questions 1. 3)

E.5 3

E.6 !Fee Struauro (E 6 Question 1) 3 3

L~s .-Pl c.(!,o..,.,1J..

(A,.La t:e, Aw b eM'-- 1/6--h :S

JP

4

3

3

3

SP-19-0104 Electronic Bidding Solution Prospective Contractor Name: Central Bidding

LM

4

3

Or"\

MJ

3

4

Average of Rtw Point.s for Category

4.00

s.81

3.33

3.33

Weighted Score Sheet SP-19-0104

Prospective Contractor Name: Central Bidding



Criteria Consensus (5 pts. per Points Points Possible' Weighted Score Sheet Question) Received (Out of 700) Points Scored

E.1 4.00 5 80%

E.2

E.3

E.4 3.67 5 73% 150 110.00

E.5 3.33 5 67% 100 66.67

E.6 3.33 5 67% 100 66.67


Signaure: C (J .4 QM d) I~ cY)

Printed Name: Gu VJ/) la-ec Tu om r?SOQ Date: 7 ) I O / l VJ

1



SP-19-0104 Electronic Bidding Solution Prospective Contractor Name: Cobblestone Software

O = Unacceptable 1 = Poor 2 = Marginal 3 = Acceptable 4 = G-Ood 5 = Excellent

Criteria

Experience (E. I Oue,llo"" t . 3)

E. 1

Ptevious Ptojeds (E.2 Oue:stion 1)

E.2

U!.lga1ion (Not SCOred) (E.3 Question 1)

E.3

Understanding and Approach 10 Requiremcnls (E..4 QucsJion.s 1 . 3)

E.4

Security. Implementation, and Contracling (E.S Oues.t.ions 1 - 3)

E.5

E.6 !Fee Structure (c.6 Question 1)

CT AY DP JP LM

2 3 3 3

3 3 3 3

3 3 3 4

2

CU:~bfv TuOW105oY1

Ia!t7;~~ Les M <-(!,c,;,14yJ.,

.~b~ Ya. h&=

MJ

3

Average of Raw Point• tor Category

2.17

3.17

us

1.33


Prospective Contractor Name: Cobblestone Software

Col.A Col. B



E.1 -E.2 -E.3

E.4 I 3.17

E.5 I 3.33

E.6 I 1.33

Signaure: ~ 6 ~ ,. w , v,~; Printed Name: Ca VJ()~( ·ru =;;; Date: 1 /1 D )15

I

Col. C

Raw Points Possible

(5 pts. per Question)

5

5

5

Col.D Col. E Col. F

Percentage of Possible Raw Weighted

Points Points Possible' Weighted Received (Out of 700) Points Scored

63% 150 95.00

67% 100 66.67

27% 100 26.67

TOTAL $COREi 278.331



SP-19-0104 Electronic Bidding Solution Prospective Contractor Name: Ion Wave Technologies, Inc.

O = Unacceptable 1 = Poor 2 = Marginal 3 = Acceptable 4 = Good 5 = Excellent

Criteria

Ex~rience (E.1 Oucs.tions 1 • 3) E.1

PrevioU$ Projects (E,2 Question 1) E.2

Litlgalion (Not Scored) (E.3 OueSlloo I )

E.3

Unders.taodtng a.nd Appco.aeh to Requirements (E . .C OuMtions 1 • 3) E.4

5eour1ty, lmpltmentation, and Contraditlg (E.S Oueslions t . 3)

E.5

E.6 IF•• Structure (E.6 Ouesi;oo 1)

CT AY DP JP LM

4 4 4 4

4 4 4 4 5

4 5 4 5

4 4

4

co~\?,-£ ( \VtoVM fscYl D~ !!_~ 1,3 \ V'"°~.

N,tA-cllc~ L -.J · i<s ,,u_~r: I ci.r-sGY'.

-? CJ'tj /1

,~ 'o1& y /! i:e:o_s

MJ

5

5

Average of Raw Points for C11egory

4.17

,uo

4.17

~ -

Weighted Score Sheet SP-19-0104 Prospective Contract Name: Ion Wave Technologies, Inc.

Col.A Col. B Col. C Col. D Col. E Col. F

Averaged Raw Raw Points Percentage of I I

Points from Possible Possible Raw Weighted

Criteria Consensus (5 pts. per Points Points Possible! Weighted Score Sheet Question) Received (Out of 700) Points Scored

E.1

I 4.171 51 83%.1 501 41.67

E.2 --

E.3

E.4 4.50 5 9()% 150 1·36~00

E.5 4.17 5 83% 100 83.33 -

E.6 I 4.33 5 87% 100 86.67


Signaure: C.cu;i QCM ~ k ~ Printed Name: Ct'J. ll]ll lQe V IVl C>/Yi psov1 Date: 7 /10 LI~

•


Key for Assignment of Points: O = Unacceptable 1 = Poor 2 = Marginal 3 = Acceptable 4 = Good 5 = Excellent

Criteria

Experience (E.1 Queslions 1 - 3)

E.1 I

Previous Projects (E.2 Question 1)

E.2

Litigation (Not Scored) (E.3 Question 1)

E.3

Understanding and Approach to Requirements (E.4 Questions 1 - 3)

E.4

Serurity, Implementation, and Contracting (E.S Questions 1 - 3)

E .S

E.6 Fee Structure (E.6 Question 1)

CT AY DP JP

2 3 2 3

2 2 2 2

2 2 2 3

Printed Name

ill Vn i'.'.2:-C( 1b:im p S ctYl .D @12A,1K. f MrttJi§

kR~wt H,s:ltdl~· L_~ ..Jc:, kAJ OA

L-t-<; µc.6au2.~

/:n'.Y) 6 V{L VA--t-t /1

SP-19-0104 Electronic Bidding Solutior Prospective Contractor Name: LSI Consultin!

Average of Raw Points for

LM MJ Category

3 3 2.67

3 3 2.33

3 3 2.50


Prospective Contractor Name: LSI Consulting

Col.A Col. B Col. C Col. D Col. E Col. F

Averaged Raw Raw Points Percentage of I I

Points from Possible Possible Raw Weighted


E.1 2.67 5 ij3% 50 26.67

E.2 2.67 5 ij3% 100 63.33

E.3

E.4 2.67 5 53% 150 80.00

E.5 2.33 5 47% 100 46.67

E.6 I 2.50 5 50% 100 60.00


SignaureQeu,_ .QK cj /,1 ~Grl

Printed Name:~k:JU \v)oCQpsOVI Date: 7- /t O (19


Key for Assignment of Points: 0 = Unacceptable 1 = Poor 2 = Marginal 3 = Acceptable 4 = Good 5 = Excellent

Criteria I CT I AY I OP I JP

Experience (E.1 Questions 1 - 3)

E.1 2 2 1 2


E.2 2 2 1 2 - - - t·· ... I - - '

- . I '


E.3


E.4 2 2 1 2

Security, Implementation, and Contracting (E.5 Questions 1 - 3)

E.5 2 2 1 2

E.6 Fee Structure (E.6 Question 1) 2 2 1 2

~Nam,

~ VyJ bLY lJ;1fyv1(25 cVl

Dfu/1/2-- A-L /)411:Mn },, l, ~ (/) ':t ' ,

fA.. ,ucllc.. L ·_JC)J...A..soC\ •

lc-s J/1, '--0-,t,0f; ~

~6vit2_ Ya ¼

SP-19-0104 Electronic Bidding Solutior Prospective Contractor Name: MTX Group, In


I LM I MJ I Category

1 1 1.50

1 1 1.50 ; - . -

I I

1 2 1.67

2 2 1.83

2 1 1.67

Weighted Score Sheet

Col.A Col. B



E.1 1.50

E.2

E.3

E.4 1.67

E.5 1.83

E.6 1.67

Signaure C Cg ) C\, Q.,c..-<-::,_ 6 J/"\rfr-4)0 /)/1

Printed Name: Cav'\q[o~e C T}) O {Y)()S;O it::)

Date: 7/ LO [JCR

SP-19-0104 Prospective Contractor Name: MTX Group, Inc.

Col. C Col. D Col. E Col. F

Raw Points Percentage of Possible Possible Raw Weighted

(5 pts. per Points Points Possible! Weighted Question) Received (Out of 700) Points Scored

5 30% 50 16.00

5 33% 150 60.00

5 37% 100 36.67

5 33% 100 33.33

TOTAL SCORE! 165.00I



SP-19-0104 Electronic Bidding Solutior Prospective Contractor Name: Periscope Holding:


Criteria I

Experience (E.1 Questions 1 • 3)

E.1 I


E.2 I


E.3

Understanding and Approaeh to Requirements (E.4 Questions 1 • 3)

E.4 I

Security, Implementation. and Contracting (E.5 Questions 1 • 3)

E.5


·HI

CT I AV I DP I JP

0 I 0 I 0 I 0

0 I 0 I 0 I 0

0 I 0 I 0 I 0

0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0

Printed Name

Ca VY)\o_Qf TooYnp56n VM4rii f ,4,1.,,1J-rPl> ~ e-p~ .

[VJ f ti{~/ k-: l- Jo r::s<Y) Le:s µc~,~~A A-wJo ed?---- y"' te.. s


I LM I MJ I Category

I 0 I 0 I 0.00

I 0 I 0 I 0.00

I 0 I 0 I 0.00

0 0 0.00

0 0 o.oo

Weighted Score Sheet SP-19-0104 Prospective Contractor Name: Periscope Holdings, Inc.


Averaged Raw Raw Points Percentage of Weighted Points from Possible Possible Raw Points

Criteria Consensus (5 pts. per Points Possible I Weighted Score Sheet Question) Received (Out of 700) Points Scored

E.1 -E.2 -E.3

E.4 I 0.00 5 0% 150 0.00

E.5 I 0.00 5 0% 100 0.00

E.6 I. 0.00 5 0% 100 0.00

TOTAL SCORE! 0.001

s ;gnaure Ca ~ :D\a ~ Printed Name: C O ({\(] la-e_v::: To O(YJ os;:o I'") Date: 7 / l D ( ( CJ I


Key for Assignment of Points: 0 = Unacceptable 1 = Poor 2 = Marginal 3 = Acceptable 4 = Good 5 = Excellent

Criteria

Experience (E.1 Questions 1 - 3)

E.1 I


E.2


E.3


E.4

Security, Implementation, and Contracting (E.5 Questions 1 - 3)

E.5


{LL~

CT AY DP JP

2 2 3 3

2 3 2 2

1 1 2 2

1 1 2 2

3 3 3 3

Printed Name

U'.J VYl be/ =1:}) oillp S;:,'Yl D llr2 llA-L e 4r2--t4ifJ +S

)vl- evcy !vtt-cAc_f/e, L, .....1oWoA

Lc:s ./4/l c;0-A'JJ..A

dM be&- Y Ah 5

SP-1 9-0104 Electronic Bidding Solutior Prospective Contractor Name: Sysoft


LM MJ Category

3 3 2.87

3

2 2 1.87

1 2 1.60

3 3 3.00

Weighted Score Sheet SP-19-0104 Prospective Contractor Name: Sysoft

Col.A Col. B Col.C Col. D Col. E Col. F



E.1 -

E.2 -E.3 -- ' .

E.4 .. 1.67 5 .' ~3% 150 ·:•;60.00 · ...

E.5 1.50 5 30% 100 · 30.00 . ;·

E.6 3.00 5 60% 100 60.00

TOTAL $COREi 216.671

Signaure: ~ ~ /)

Printed Name: C¼m\'.2£ r :IbDCYJ'.DSOv'.)

Date: l / I O f IC/ I

Documents

t~~~~OQ - Arkansas · 2019. 7. 25. · Printed Name: Cecm be f Th QIY\r S'Ofl Date: 1}'l-'-1/t4 SP-19-0104 Prospective Contractor Name: Central Bidding Col.C Col. D Col. E Col. F