Upload
ruth-chua
View
221
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/3/2019 Topic 2 Nature of Empt Rship BUSM1084 Sem 3 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/topic-2-nature-of-empt-rship-busm1084-sem-3-2011 1/32
Topic 2The nature of the employmentrelationship
BUSM1084 Employment Relations
Semester 3, 2011
8/3/2019 Topic 2 Nature of Empt Rship BUSM1084 Sem 3 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/topic-2-nature-of-empt-rship-busm1084-sem-3-2011 2/32
RMIT University 2
Introduction
• Overview of Chapter 1 of Balnave (2007) – The nature of the employment relationship – Conflict and the employment relationship –
Frames of reference (unitarist, pluralist, radical) – Individualism and collectivism – Industrial relations – HRM – Integration of IR and HRM – Employment relations
8/3/2019 Topic 2 Nature of Empt Rship BUSM1084 Sem 3 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/topic-2-nature-of-empt-rship-busm1084-sem-3-2011 3/32
RMIT University 3
Introduction
• Activity: are you a unitarist, pluralist, or radical?
• Note that Balnave is written from a pluralistorientation. Up to page 9 is presented as merelyfactual yet is really predicated on a pluralistorientation.
8/3/2019 Topic 2 Nature of Empt Rship BUSM1084 Sem 3 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/topic-2-nature-of-empt-rship-busm1084-sem-3-2011 4/32
RMIT University 4
Intro
• Definition of employment relations: a bridgingterm that both integrates industrial relations andHRM, and broadens the boundaries of bothdisciplines to encompass a wider range of stakeholders and environmental factors
(Balnave et al 2007, p. 497)
8/3/2019 Topic 2 Nature of Empt Rship BUSM1084 Sem 3 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/topic-2-nature-of-empt-rship-busm1084-sem-3-2011 5/32
RMIT University 5
Nature of the employment relationship
• ‘At its most basic level, the employmentrelationship is an economic exchange, anagreement between employer and employee over the sale of the latter’s ‘labour power’ or capacityto work.’ (p. 2)
• ie simple economic exchange
8/3/2019 Topic 2 Nature of Empt Rship BUSM1084 Sem 3 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/topic-2-nature-of-empt-rship-busm1084-sem-3-2011 6/32
8/3/2019 Topic 2 Nature of Empt Rship BUSM1084 Sem 3 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/topic-2-nature-of-empt-rship-busm1084-sem-3-2011 7/32RMIT University 7
Nature of the employment relationship
So, contradictionsManagement can’t treat workers as another
commodity, they need workers’ effort & creativity
Mgt must seek consent to directives
Workers resist exploitation, subordination; but alsoneed to ensure their employment and viability of
the org
8/3/2019 Topic 2 Nature of Empt Rship BUSM1084 Sem 3 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/topic-2-nature-of-empt-rship-busm1084-sem-3-2011 8/32RMIT University 8
Nature of the employment relationship
This is what makes the employment relationshipinterdependent.
‘Employment relationship cannot be viewed as a
simple dialectic of (management) control and(worker) resistance. Rather, it involves “afractured interplay of control, consensus, andbargaining”.’
(Balnave, p. 3 citing Bray & Littler)
8/3/2019 Topic 2 Nature of Empt Rship BUSM1084 Sem 3 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/topic-2-nature-of-empt-rship-busm1084-sem-3-2011 9/32RMIT University 9
Nature of the employment relationship
Psychological contract:• Unwritten expectations which are beyond the
legal contract of employment
• ‘the perception of both parties to the employmentrelationship, organisation and individual, of thereciprocal promises and obligations implied in theobligations
• Expectations of fairness, trust, loyalty, job securityetc
8/3/2019 Topic 2 Nature of Empt Rship BUSM1084 Sem 3 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/topic-2-nature-of-empt-rship-busm1084-sem-3-2011 10/32RMIT University 10
Nature of the employment relationship
Psychological contract:‘Growing recognition among researchers that the
psychological contract of employment has brokendown in recent years’
Permanent, full-time, secure employment decliningin Australia
New psychological contract?
Contra Singapore situation?
8/3/2019 Topic 2 Nature of Empt Rship BUSM1084 Sem 3 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/topic-2-nature-of-empt-rship-busm1084-sem-3-2011 11/32RMIT University 11
Conflict and the employment relationship
‘The multidimensional nature of the employmentrelationship creates potential for conflict betweenthe parties’ ie industrial conflict.
Can be over:
• Wages and employment conditions
• Social and political concerns (not in Singapore)
• Managerial prerogatives
8/3/2019 Topic 2 Nature of Empt Rship BUSM1084 Sem 3 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/topic-2-nature-of-empt-rship-busm1084-sem-3-2011 12/32RMIT University 12
Conflict and the employment relationship
Managerial prerogative: ‘the right of managers or business owners to make unilateral decisionsabout all aspects of their business withoutinterference from government, workers or unions’(p. 5)
Term from Australian IR
Also recognised in Singapore with legal prohibitionon bargaining over issues such as hiring,promotion, job allocation, firing
8/3/2019 Topic 2 Nature of Empt Rship BUSM1084 Sem 3 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/topic-2-nature-of-empt-rship-busm1084-sem-3-2011 13/32RMIT University 13
Manifestations of conflict
Overt = open. Usually collective, organised. Incstrikes, lockouts, picketing, threats of plantclosures, outsourcing of tasks
Covert = not visible or public. Usually individual,unorganised. Includes: absenteeism, labour turnover, sabotage, restriction of work effort, strictdisciplinary codes linked to threats of dismissal
etc.
8/3/2019 Topic 2 Nature of Empt Rship BUSM1084 Sem 3 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/topic-2-nature-of-empt-rship-busm1084-sem-3-2011 14/32RMIT University 14
Manifestations of conflict
‘The nature of the employment relationship isclearly reflected in these manifestations of conflict. Although employers hold the balance of power, employees bargain with their compliance,commitment and work effort.’ (p. 7)
In Aust, overt conflict attracts more attention, butcovert conflict is more costly to business. Overt
conflict in decline.
8/3/2019 Topic 2 Nature of Empt Rship BUSM1084 Sem 3 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/topic-2-nature-of-empt-rship-busm1084-sem-3-2011 15/32RMIT University 15
Manifestations of conflict
Conflict displacement thesis: ‘although industrialdisputes involving collective work stoppages havedeclined, the decline cannot be equated per sewith a reduction of industrial conflict. Rather,evidence from Australia and overseas suggeststhat without the ability to voice dissatisfactionthrough collective action, workers are more likelyto resort to more covert methods, includingabsenteeism, low productivity and high labour turnover.’ (p. 9)
8/3/2019 Topic 2 Nature of Empt Rship BUSM1084 Sem 3 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/topic-2-nature-of-empt-rship-busm1084-sem-3-2011 16/32RMIT University 16
Frames of reference
• ‘A “frame of reference” refers to a person’sperspective on the world. It comprises theassumptions, values, beliefs and convictions wedraw on to interpret and understand the way
things are and why they happen.’• ‘important tool for understanding why peoplebehave the way they do in employment relations’.Managers’ frames of reference shape the way
they approach ER, workers’ frames influence howthey respond to authority, govts’ frames shapeslaws.
8/3/2019 Topic 2 Nature of Empt Rship BUSM1084 Sem 3 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/topic-2-nature-of-empt-rship-busm1084-sem-3-2011 17/32RMIT University 17
Frame of reference
• ‘there is no one way of viewing the world of work.Rather, people with make judgements on thebasis of their own assumptions and beliefs’. (p.10)
– Unitarist – Pluralist – Radical/Marxist
• Handout: Table, ‘Frames of reference inemployment relations’
• Handout: ‘Are you a unitarist, pluralist or radical?’
8/3/2019 Topic 2 Nature of Empt Rship BUSM1084 Sem 3 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/topic-2-nature-of-empt-rship-busm1084-sem-3-2011 18/32RMIT University 18
Industrial relations
• Diverse views of its scope and content• Always focused on institutions of job regulation;
‘the role of trade unions, employers and the
government, and the institutions they help createto regulate industrial conflict, such as collectivebargaining and arbitration.
• Doubt over academic status: is it a discipline itself or a multi-disciplinary area?
8/3/2019 Topic 2 Nature of Empt Rship BUSM1084 Sem 3 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/topic-2-nature-of-empt-rship-busm1084-sem-3-2011 19/32RMIT University 19
Industrial relations
• Practical focus• Generally pluralist in orientation
• Focus on rules
• Systems approach popular in IR.
8/3/2019 Topic 2 Nature of Empt Rship BUSM1084 Sem 3 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/topic-2-nature-of-empt-rship-busm1084-sem-3-2011 20/32RMIT University 20
Systems approach to IR
• Dunlop (1958). Derived from wider systemsapproach derived from ‘structural functionalism’then in vogue in American sociology
• ie actors, contexts, inputs, outputs
• ‘central function of IR is the determination of workplace rules’
• System comprises: actors, contexts, ideology,web of rules
• Actors interact in various contexts to producerules that enable the system to keep functioning.
8/3/2019 Topic 2 Nature of Empt Rship BUSM1084 Sem 3 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/topic-2-nature-of-empt-rship-busm1084-sem-3-2011 21/32
RMIT University 21
Systems approach to IR
CriticismsDescriptive, not analytical
Radicals criticise concept of shared ideology,preoccupation with stability, status quo, disregardfor inequality.
Some parties can seek to eliminate others
Too deterministic, doesn’t allow for actors’strategic choices
8/3/2019 Topic 2 Nature of Empt Rship BUSM1084 Sem 3 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/topic-2-nature-of-empt-rship-busm1084-sem-3-2011 22/32
RMIT University 22
Systems approach and Singapore
Note that one of the key questions for this Topic is‘How applicable is the systems approach toSingapore?’.
Generally considered to be very relevant, asreflected in Tan text (2007, p. 4)
Topic 5 considers an alternative approach (Leggett2007) which argues that the strategic choicemodel has greater utility explaining evolution of Singapore IR .
8/3/2019 Topic 2 Nature of Empt Rship BUSM1084 Sem 3 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/topic-2-nature-of-empt-rship-busm1084-sem-3-2011 23/32
RMIT University 23
Challenges to traditional IR
• Tendency to focus on ‘industrial’, unionised, male,manual workers ignores shift to services sector,non traditional employment
• Too prescriptive; no general theory• Radical critique of pluralist assumption of shared
power
• Lack of historical perspective
8/3/2019 Topic 2 Nature of Empt Rship BUSM1084 Sem 3 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/topic-2-nature-of-empt-rship-busm1084-sem-3-2011 24/32
RMIT University 24
HRM
• Established in US in 1980s, slightly later in UK, Aust and Singapore
• Formerly known as personnel management
• Exact nature of HRM, and differences from PMcontentious.
• More strategic than PM which was administrative
and low status
8/3/2019 Topic 2 Nature of Empt Rship BUSM1084 Sem 3 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/topic-2-nature-of-empt-rship-busm1084-sem-3-2011 25/32
RMIT University 25
HRM
• People a source of competitive advantage• Connection between HR and org performance
• Integration and fit with business strategies
• Strong culture
• Common interests
• Cooperation, unitarist approach• Soft and hard
8/3/2019 Topic 2 Nature of Empt Rship BUSM1084 Sem 3 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/topic-2-nature-of-empt-rship-busm1084-sem-3-2011 26/32
RMIT University 26
Limitations of HRM
• Normative HRM criticised for its unitarist approach.• HRM obscures reality of employment relationship
• Focus on enterprise level rather than societal, labour market
• Contradictions:1. Individualism versus collectivism2.Commitment versus flexibility3.Strong culture versus adaptability
• Is it really new or old wine in new bottles?
• Deliberate, useful ambiguity?
8/3/2019 Topic 2 Nature of Empt Rship BUSM1084 Sem 3 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/topic-2-nature-of-empt-rship-busm1084-sem-3-2011 27/32
RMIT University 27
Case for integration of IR, HRM
• Key differences between them
• Some authors say they are incompatible
8/3/2019 Topic 2 Nature of Empt Rship BUSM1084 Sem 3 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/topic-2-nature-of-empt-rship-busm1084-sem-3-2011 28/32
RMIT University 28
Differences between IR, HRM
INDUSTRIALRELATIONS
HRM
Collective Individual focus
Unionised sectors Non-unionised sectors
Blue-collar workers White-collar
External forces Internal forces
Pluralist Unitarist
8/3/2019 Topic 2 Nature of Empt Rship BUSM1084 Sem 3 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/topic-2-nature-of-empt-rship-busm1084-sem-3-2011 29/32
RMIT University 29
Integration of IR and HRM?
Or are they two sides of the same coin?Balnave argues that they both ‘remain important in
terms of their distinct approaches to the
employment’ but ‘the differences between theareas of practice and discipline in Australia isblurring’.
Need a more holistic, inclusive, dynamic approach:employment relations
8/3/2019 Topic 2 Nature of Empt Rship BUSM1084 Sem 3 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/topic-2-nature-of-empt-rship-busm1084-sem-3-2011 30/32
RMIT University 30
Employment Relations
According to Balnave:• ER ‘a legitimate bridging term that reflects the
overlapping concerns of HRM and IR’
• ER ‘broadens the boundaries of both disciplines’• ER ‘encompasses a wider range of stakeholders
and environmental factors’
8/3/2019 Topic 2 Nature of Empt Rship BUSM1084 Sem 3 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/topic-2-nature-of-empt-rship-busm1084-sem-3-2011 31/32
RMIT University 31
Conclusion
• But ER still controversial.
• According to Stone, ER is merely a response byIR academics to the threat posed by rise of HRMin practice and theory. ie ‘integrating industrialrelations and HRM and presenting it as the“emperor in new clothes”’(2007)
8/3/2019 Topic 2 Nature of Empt Rship BUSM1084 Sem 3 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/topic-2-nature-of-empt-rship-busm1084-sem-3-2011 32/32
Key questions
1. Why is the employment relationship interdependent?
2. What is managerial prerogative and how far should itextend?
3. What is the difference between overt and covert formsof industrial conflict? Give some examples of each
4. How do the unitarist, pluralist and radical frames of reference differ in their assumptions about the nature of the employment relationship?
5. What is the systems approach and what are itsstrengths and weaknesses? How applicable is it toSingapore?
6. What role does freedom and choice play in theemployment relationship?