18
Top Measurement Prospects with LHCb Philip Ilten on behalf of the LHCb Collaboration Massachusetts Institute of Technology September 27, 2014 Ilten Top with LHCb September 27, 2014 1 / 18

Top Measurement Prospects with LHCb · Experiment Trigger [JINST8(2013)P04022] • RunInumbershere • movableL0thresholdsand softwareHLT • highp T andjettriggers L0 µ: pT >1.5GeV

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Top Measurement Prospects with LHCb

Philip Iltenon behalf of the LHCb Collaboration

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

September 27, 2014

Ilten Top with LHCb September 27, 2014 1 / 18

Introduction

Introduction

• forward top production• reduced gg-scattering• increased charge asymmetry• low and high x gluons

• experiment• detector• trigger• reconstruction• jet tagging• datasets

• expectations• cross-sections• asymmetries• gluon PDF

• discussion

Ilten Top with LHCb September 27, 2014 2 / 18

Experiment

Experiment

Ilten Top with LHCb September 27, 2014 3 / 18

Experiment

Detector [JINST 3 (2008) S08005]

VELO

RICH1

TT

magnet

OT

IT

T1T2

T3

RICH2

M1

M2M3M4M5

HCAL

ECALmuon system5 m

5 m 15 mz-axis →

y-ax

is→

SPD/PRS

• fully instrumented between 2 < η < 5• momentum resolution between 0.4% at 5 GeV to 0.6% at 100 GeV• impact parameter resolution of 13− 20 µm for tracks• secondary vertex reconstruction with precision of

0.01− 0.05(0.1− 0.3) mm in xy(z)Ilten Top with LHCb September 27, 2014 4 / 18

Experiment

Trigger [JINST 8 (2013) P04022]

• Run I numbers here• movable L0 thresholds and

software HLT• high pT and jet triggers

L0

µ: pT > 1.5 GeV340 kHz

µµ:√

p1Tp2

T > 1.3 GeV75 kHz

h: ET > 3.5 GeV405 kHz

e: ET > 2.5 GeV160 kHz

γ: ET > 2.5 GeV80 kHz

µ: pT > 4.8(1) GeV0.7(5) kHz

µµ: m > 2.7(1)GeV1.2(1.3) kHz

track: pT > 1.7 GeV33 kHz

e: pT > 10 GeV

. . .

µ: pT > 10(4.8) GeV

µµ: m > 4.8(3) GeV

displaced vertex

inclusive topologicalbeauty BBDT

inclusive andexclusive charm

. . .

15 MHz 5 kHz

HLT1 HLT2

1 MHz 50 kHz

Ilten Top with LHCb September 27, 2014 5 / 18

Experiment

Topological Trigger [JINST 8 (2013) P04022]

• 2, 3, 4-body vertex inclusiveB-hadron trigger

• discrete BDT (Bonsai BDT)• γ, µ(µ), e, or h at L0• single track at HLT1• εTOS w.r.t offline candidates

variable pre-cut (2, 3, 4-body)

Σ |pT| > 3, 4, 4 GeVpminT > 0.5 GeV

m < 7 GeVmcor −DOCA < 0.2 mmIP χ2 −FD χ2 > 100

Ilten Top with LHCb September 27, 2014 6 / 18

Experiment

Muon and Jet Reconstruction [JHEP 01 (2014) 033]

• event (pT(µ) > 20 GeV)• ≈ (91± 0.1)% event

multiplicity efficiency• muon (pT > 20 GeV)

• efficiencies from data withtag-and-probe

• ≈ (80± 0.6)% triggerefficiency

• ≈ (90± 0.6)% track efficiency• ≈ (99± 0.3)% ID efficiency

• jet (pT > 30 GeV)• particle flow with anti-kT• efficiencies from simulation• ≈ (95± 8)% efficiency• ≈ (10− 15)% energy

resolution

VELO TT

OTECAL

muon system

tag

test

HCAL

probe

Ilten Top with LHCb September 27, 2014 7 / 18

Experiment

Jet Tagging [Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 (2014) 082003]

• pseudo-topological tagger(pTOPO)

• uses TOPO BBDT• bb̄ forward-central asymmetry

(published)• Z + b-jet cross-section (in

review)• pTOPO tagged jet

(pT > 20 GeV)• b-efficiency ≈ 40%• light mis-tag < 0.1%

• dedicated b, c-tagger undervalidation

• from simulation• b-efficiency ≈ 60%• light mis-tag < 0.1%

mcor =√

m2 + p2 sin θ2 +p sin θ

Ilten Top with LHCb September 27, 2014 8 / 18

Experiment

Collected Datasets [2012 JINST 7 P01010]

• 2011 at√

s = 7 TeV• 1.1 fb−1

• 2012 at√

s = 8 TeV• 2.1 fb−1

• 2015− 2017 at√

s = 13 TeV• ≈ 5 fb−1

• 2020− 2030 at√

s = 14 TeV• ≈ 50 fb−1

2011

date [day/month]28/02 09/04 19/05 29/06 08/08 18/09 28/10

L[ fb−

1]

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

LHCbATLASCMS

2012

date [day/month]28/02 18/04 05/06 23/07 09/09 27/10 14/12

L[ fb−

1]

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

LHCbATLASCMS

Ilten Top with LHCb September 27, 2014 9 / 18

Expectations

Expectations

Ilten Top with LHCb September 27, 2014 10 / 18

Expectations

Cross-sections (1) [LHCb-PUB-2013-009]

• Gauld• lb, lbj , lbb, lbbj , l+l−, and l+l−b final states

• 2 < η(µ, jet) < 4.5• pT(l) > 20(7, 10) GeV• pT(jet) > 60(20) GeV

• b-efficiency 70%• light mis-tag 1%• charm mis-tag 15%

• selection can be considerably improved

state σ(7 TeV) [fb] σ(8 TeV) [fb] σ(14 TeV) [fb]

lb 285± 52 504± 94 4366±663lbj 97± 21 198± 35 2335±323lbb 32± 6 65± 12 870±116lbbj 10± 2 26± 4 487± 76l+l− 44± 9 79± 15 635±109l+l−b 19± 4 39± 8 417± 79

Ilten Top with LHCb September 27, 2014 11 / 18

Expectations

Cross-sections (2) [LHCb-PUB-2013-009]

Ilten Top with LHCb September 27, 2014 12 / 18

Expectations

Asymmetries (1) [Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 (2011) 082003]

• Kagan, Kamenik, Perez, Stone• forward asymmetry

At ≡(

N (t)−N (t̄)N (t) + N (t̄)

)2<η<5

• select µ and b-jet• 2 < η(µ, jet) < 5• pT(µ) > 20 GeV• pT(jet) > 50 GeV• b-efficiency 50%• light mis-tag 1%

• backgrounds• single top• W + light, b-jet• QCD multi-jet (light or b)

Ilten Top with LHCb September 27, 2014 13 / 18

Expectations

Asymmetries (2) [LHCb-PUB-2013-009]

• Gauld• charge asymmetry

Ac ≡N (∆ |y| > 0)−N (∆ |y| < 0)N (∆ |y| > 0) + N (∆ |y| < 0)

• select µ and b-jet• 2 < η(µ, jet) < 4.5• pT(µ) > 20 GeV• pT(jet) > 60 GeV• b-efficiency 70%• light mis-tag 1%• charm mis-tag 15%

• backgrounds• single top• W + light, b-jet

7 TeV 8 TeV 14 TeV

At 0.69+0.12−0.11 0.55+0.10

−0.09 0.27+0.13−0.12

Alb 2.23+0.43−0.68 0.97+0.74

−0.45 0.54+0.39−0.31

Ac 1.75+0.67−0.47 1.64+0.58

−0.67 1.08+0.27−0.32

Ilten Top with LHCb September 27, 2014 14 / 18

Expectations

Asymmetries (3) [LHCb-PUB-2013-009]

• asymmetry can improve with more sophisticated selection

Ilten Top with LHCb September 27, 2014 15 / 18

Expectations

Gluon PDF (1) [JHEP 02 (2014) 126]

• Gauld• constrain high x gluon PDF

Q2(x) =

xs uppere±2|η|x2√s left/rightm2

min lower

x-610 -510 -410 -310 -210 -110 1

Q2[ G

eV2]

1

10

210

310

410

510

610

710

LHCbTevatronHERAfixed target

Ilten Top with LHCb September 27, 2014 16 / 18

Expectations

Gluon PDF (2) [JHEP 02 (2014) 126]

Ilten Top with LHCb September 27, 2014 17 / 18

Discussion

Discussion

• LHCb now has the tools and analyses in place to make a topmeasurement

• using 2012 data, observation should be possible• large statistical uncertainty• possible inclusive combined t and tt̄ cross-section?

• what measurements are needed in the future?• separation of t and tt̄• what is the ideal suite of top measurements LHCb could make?• differential in what?• asymmetries, or just cross-sections?

Ilten Top with LHCb September 27, 2014 18 / 18