2
FACULTY OF MECHANICAL & MANUFACTURING ENGINEERING UNIVERSITI TUN HUSSEIN ONN MALAYSIA Introduction (10%) Group Description Product / Project Background Objective & Design Scope Milestone / Planning Chart Design and Analysis (75%) Concept Development [Sketching] (5%) Addresses the entire system (global picture) Shows how each component fits together Labels components to identify key features and provides description Shows approximate dimensions Provides realistic visualization Engineering Analysis Fundamental Analysis (10%) Power required are determine with proper justification and calculation Motor is been selected properly with proof and reasonable power Gear ratio is determine accordingly Gear Fundamental Analysis (10%) Module selection are reasonable Number of gear teeth are determine properly Diameter, torque and RPM are calculate properly Contact ratio analysis are also included Acting load at each gear are been calculated correctly Gear Failure Analysis (15%) Material selection has been discuss properly Determination of face width and Qv are reasonable Correct prosedure used to calculate AGMA bending and pitting stress Describe with details Used proper justification and assumption Bending and pitting safety factor are in acceptable range Shaft Analysis (15%) Correct resolve forces at the shaft free body diagram Calculate bending load with proper bending moment diagram Shaft material selection is also been discussed Include with proper stress concentration factor analysis Calculated minimum diameter required at each gear Fatigue and yield factors of safety are met Included with tolerances and fitting analysis at each shaft Bearing Analysis (5%) Bearing forces have been correct resolved Correct prosedures used to determine bearing load rating Suitable bearing size have been selected Housing Analysis (5%) All component are fit well and assemble properly Fitting analysis are also included at bearing support Sound engineering effort made to reduce overall weight Innovative design (clear and reasonable) BDA 30803 - DESIGN PROJECT REPORT - TOP 4 BEST REPORT SEM II 2011/2012 RATING COMPARISON Exaggerate Exaggerate Front Michanikos Front Michanikos PRO DESIGN Design Box Design Box PRO DESIGN 2.1 2.2 2 No. Evaluate Item 1 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4

Top 4 Best Report Comparison

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

FACULTY OF MECHANICAL & MANUFACTURING ENGINEERING

UNIVERSITI TUN HUSSEIN ONN MALAYSIA

Introduction (10%)

Group Description

Product / Project Background

Objective & Design Scope

Milestone / Planning Chart

Design and Analysis (75%)

Concept Development [Sketching] (5%) Addresses the entire system (global picture)

Shows how each component fits together

Labels components to identify key features and provides description

Shows approximate dimensions

Provides realistic visualization

Engineering Analysis

Fundamental Analysis (10%) Power required are determine with proper justification and calculation

Motor is been selected properly with proof and reasonable power

Gear ratio is determine accordingly

Gear Fundamental Analysis (10%) Module selection are reasonable

Number of gear teeth are determine properly

Diameter, torque and RPM are calculate properly

Contact ratio analysis are also included

Acting load at each gear are been calculated correctly

Gear Failure Analysis (15%) Material selection has been discuss properly

Determination of face width and Qv are reasonable

Correct prosedure used to calculate AGMA bending and pitting stress

Describe with details

Used proper justification and assumption

Bending and pitting safety factor are in acceptable range

Shaft Analysis (15%) Correct resolve forces at the shaft free body diagram

Calculate bending load with proper bending moment diagram

Shaft material selection is also been discussed

Include with proper stress concentration factor analysis

Calculated minimum diameter required at each gear

Fatigue and yield factors of safety are met

Included with tolerances and fitting analysis at each shaft

Bearing Analysis (5%) Bearing forces have been correct resolved

Correct prosedures used to determine bearing load rating

Suitable bearing size have been selected

Housing Analysis (5%) All component are fit well and assemble properly

Fitting analysis are also included at bearing support

Sound engineering effort made to reduce overall weight

Innovative design (clear and reasonable)

BDA 30803 - DESIGN PROJECT REPORT - TOP 4 BEST REPORT SEM II 2011/2012 RATING COMPARISON

Exaggerate

Exaggerate

Front

Michanikos

Front

MichanikosPRO DESIGN

Design Box

Design Box

PRO DESIGN

2.1

2.2

2

No. Evaluate Item

1

1.1

1.2

1.3

1.4

Detail Design - Project Drawing (10%) Show assemble component in 3D drawing with adequate clarity

Use exploded views with BOM to show assemble of parts

Provide adequate dimensioning and tolerances to build part properly

Adheres to ANSI standard

Arrange the drawing in systematic approach

Fill all the information required in the drawing title block

Conclusion and Recommendation (10%) Conclude on Project Understanding and Achievement

Recommendation

References (5%)

Use proper format

Well presented and organized

Bonus

Report Appearance Follow the format / Have table of contents

Contents are organize well & report is binding properly

Exaggerate

ExaggerateFront

MichanikosDesign Box

PRO DESIGN

Exaggerate

Front

Michanikos

Front

Michanikos

Front

Michanikos

Exaggerate

Design Box

Design Box

PRO DESIGN

3

4

PRO DESIGN

5

2.3

Design Box

PRO DESIGN