Upload
hatram
View
217
Download
4
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
Tools for Measuring and MonitoringTools for Measuring and Monitoring Equity in Quality: The Hospital
Perspective
Thursday, January 27, 20113:00-4:30pm EST2:00-3:30pm CST
This web seminar will begin momentarily.This web seminar will begin momentarily.
2:00-3:30pm CST1:00-2:30pm MST 12:00-1:30pm PST
Tools for Measuring and Monitoring Equity in Quality: The Hospital PerspectiveQuality: The Hospital Perspective
Susana Rinderle, MAManager, Diversity, Equity & Inclusion
(DEI) at University of New Mexico Hospitals,
Albuquerque, NM
James Walton, DO, MBAVice President and Chief
Health Equity Officer, Baylor Health Care System, Dallas, TX
Sarah Rafton, MSWDirector, Center for Diversity and Health
Equity, Seattle Children’s Hospital,
Seattle, WA
Joseph R. Betancourt, MD, MPH
Director, The Disparities Solutions Center at MGH
Moderator
2
Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)at UNM Hospitals: at UNM Hospitals:
Tools for Measuring & Monitoring EquityTools for Measuring & Monitoring EquityTools for Measuring & Monitoring EquityTools for Measuring & Monitoring Equity
Susana Rinderle, M.A.Manager ~ Diversity, Equity & Inclusion
University of New Mexico Hospitals
January 27, 2011
UNM Hospitals
• Only public and only teaching hospital of note in N.M.– One of only 30 hospitals nationwide who are both public safety net
and teaching/academicand teaching/academic
• Only Level I Trauma Center in the region
• Only emergency adult psychiatric services
• 619 beds: 5 hospitals, 48 clinics (22 offsite)
• Payer mix: 47% Medicare/Medicaid; 17.3% uncompensated
• Employees: 5900p y
• Providers: 579 faculty, 116 midlevels
• Outpatient visits: 492,000
• Inpatient days: 180,000
• Budget: $705 million
3
New Mexico• Population: nearly 2 million• State with fourth highest percentage of “frontierState with fourth highest percentage of frontier
lands”• One of only two states in the U.S. that have always
been “majority-minority”• The only majority Hispanic state in the U.S. at 45.6%
(California and Texas follow behind at 37%)• State with second highest percentage of Native
Americans (fifth highest total number)• The state with the second highest percentage of
residents that speak a language other than English at home, at 36.5%
Source: Census Bureau
Diversity, Equity & Inclusion • Interpretation – since 2003
• 16% of patients are LEP18 f ll ti i t t (14 S i h 3 Vi t• 18 full time interpreters (14 Spanish, 3 Vietnamese, 1 Navajo), 1 educator, 2 admin support staff• Only in-house interpreter dept. in state
• 130 dual role interpreters in 9 languages• Video interpreting• Pacific Interpreters 24-hour phone line
• Participation in the Disparities Solutions CenterParticipation in the Disparities Solutions Center Disparities Leadership Program, third cohort 2009-2010
• Office of DEI created October 2010
4
What is DEI?
The UNMH Office of Diversity, Equity & Inclusion l d th ff t t k th t UNMHleads the effort to make sure that every UNMH patient receives the safest, most effective, most
sensitive medical care possible, regardless of the patient’s race, ethnicity, or any other group identity.
W d thi th h d t ll ti d l iWe do this through data collection and analysis; community collaboration; cultural “competence”
training, education and consulting; and process improvement.
How does DEI do these things?
5
Diversity is a driver of Diversity is a driver of qualityquality
QU
ALIT
Y DIS
PA
RIT
IESCOMPLIANCE
COMMUNITY
COMPETENCE
CARE
6
2010: “REALS” data
RaceRace
Ethnicity
Age
Language (primary oral)
SSex
7
Collection and use of REALS
• 100% electronic medical record (EMR)• Outpatient
• Self-reported on a form at registration and data entered into EMR by staff
• Inpatient• Same self-reporting process at all points of p g p p
entry (ED, admitting)
• Included in unit/department “Operational Plans” effective July 2010
8
2011: “SOREAL” data
SeSex
Orientation (sexual orientation/transgender)?
Race
Ethnicity
AAge
Language (primary oral and written)
Initial data indicatorsClinical:
• Mortality• Length of stay (LOS)
R d i i t• Readmission rates• HgA1C levels • Outpatient pneumovax vaccines• Inpatient core measures for pneumonia• Childhood immunizations or asthma• Colorectal cancer screening
Non-clinical:• Employee race ethnicity age sex and (a) job position and (b)• Employee race, ethnicity, age, sex and (a) job position and (b)
organizational level• Employee satisfaction • Patient satisfaction• Patient no-show rates• Patient/family complaints• Self-reported employee/provider awareness, attitudes, beliefs
(pending)
9
Primary Spanish-speaking patient satisfaction
88
90
92
78
80
82
84
86
Outpatient
Inpatient
72
74
76
CY
06
Q1
CY
06
Q2
CY
06
Q3
CY
06
Q4
CY
07
Q1
CY
07
Q2
CY
07
Q3
CY
07
Q4
CY
08
Q1
CY
08
Q2
CY
08
Q3
CY
08
Q4
CY
09
Q1
CY
09
Q2
CY
09
Q3
CY
09
Q4
CY
10
Q1
CY
10
Q2
CY
10
Q3
CY
10
Q4
Primary Spanish-speaking patient satisfaction
88
90
92
78
80
82
84
86
Outpatient
Inpatient
?
72
74
76
CY
06
Q1
CY
06
Q2
CY
06
Q3
CY
06
Q4
CY
07
Q1
CY
07
Q2
CY
07
Q3
CY
07
Q4
CY
08
Q1
CY
08
Q2
CY
08
Q3
CY
08
Q4
CY
09
Q1
CY
09
Q2
CY
09
Q3
CY
09
Q4
CY
10
Q1
CY
10
Q2
CY
10
Q3
CY
10
Q4
10
Primary Spanish-speaking patient satisfaction
88
90
92
78
80
82
84
86
Outpatient
Inpatient
• Implementation of VIP• 2-TALK with stickers• ILS Educator
72
74
76
CY
06
Q1
CY
06
Q2
CY
06
Q3
CY
06
Q4
CY
07
Q1
CY
07
Q2
CY
07
Q3
CY
07
Q4
CY
08
Q1
CY
08
Q2
CY
08
Q3
CY
08
Q4
CY
09
Q1
CY
09
Q2
CY
09
Q3
CY
09
Q4
CY
10
Q1
CY
10
Q2
CY
10
Q3
CY
10
Q4
ILS Educator• Vehicle• Phone splitters in clinics• First ILS campaign• ISPEAK cards• Patient initiator cards
Spanish-speaking patient satisfaction survey returns
140
160
180
40
60
80
100
120
140
Outpatient
Inpatient
0
20
40
CY06 Q
1
CY06 Q
2
CY06 Q
3
CY06 Q
4
CY07 Q
1
CY07 Q
2
CY07 Q
3
CY07 Q
4
CY08 Q
1
CY08 Q
2
CY08 Q
3
CY08 Q
4
CY09 Q
1
CY09 Q
2
CY09 Q
3
CY09 Q
4
CY10 Q
1
CY10 Q
2
CY10 Q
3
CY10 Q
4
11
Spanish-speaking patient satisfaction survey returns
140
160
180
40
60
80
100
120
140
Outpatient
Inpatient
1.Increase in budget and # sent
2.Clinic campaign
0
20
40
CY06 Q
1
CY06 Q
2
CY06 Q
3
CY06 Q
4
CY07 Q
1
CY07 Q
2
CY07 Q
3
CY07 Q
4
CY08 Q
1
CY08 Q
2
CY08 Q
3
CY08 Q
4
CY09 Q
1
CY09 Q
2
CY09 Q
3
CY09 Q
4
CY10 Q
1
CY10 Q
2
CY10 Q
3
CY10 Q
4
First equity dashboard
12
First equity dashboard
Next steps• Modifications to data fields and collection form
• Separation of race & ethnicityCh t t ib l d li i t i• Changes to tribal and religion categories
• Exploring options for multiracial category• Addition of written language• Adding LGBT information
• Analysis of initial equity dashboard findings• Strategic plan and recommendations toStrategic plan and recommendations to
Competence and Care task forces• Rollout of unit-specific and organization-wide
training, system and process changes, and other interventions
13
What questions do you have?
Susana Rinderle, M.A.Susana Rinderle, M.A.Manager, Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI) Chair, Health Literacy Task ForceUNM Hospitals933 Bradbury Drive SE, Suite 3057Albuquerque, NM 87106
tel (505) 272-1698pager (505) 951-3927fax (505) 272-5477http://hospitals.unm.edu/dei/index.shtml
Seattle Children’s
About Us
• Specialty medical center serving Washington, Alaska,
Montana, and Idaho
• 250-bed facility
• 227,901 ambulatory visits in FY 2009
• Medicaid and state-funded health insurance 49% of patients
• Provided over $90 million in uncompensated care in FY 2009
• Culture of Continuous Performance Improvement
14
Who do we serve? FY10 Patient Race
Who do we serve? FY10 Patient Ethnicity
15
Who do we serve? FY10 Familieswith Limited English Proficiency (LEP)
16% of all families at Seattle Children’s FY10 were LEP
O 1%Other, 1%Telugu, 0%French, 0%Farsi;
Persian, 0%Laotian, 0%Portuguese,
0%Urdu, 0%Tamil, 0%Nepali, 0%Burmese, 0%German, 0%Thai, 0%Mongolian, 0%
Sign-Signing Exact English
SEE, 0%Swahili;
Kiswahili, 0%Hmong, 0%Hebrew, 0%Indonesian,
0%Unknown, 0%Mein, 0%Turkish, 0%Bengali, 0%Bulgarian, 0%Marshallese,
0%
Sign-Signed English/PSE,
0%Samoan, 0%Polish, 0%Bosnian, 0%Panjabi, 0%Ethiopian, 0%Malayalam, 0%Albanian, 0%Soninke, 0%Gujurati, 0%Kannada, 0%Ilocano, 0%
Sign-ASL and Qualified
Deaf Interp, 0%Finnish, 0%Danish, 0%Aramaic, 0%Italian, 0%
Does Not Read, 0%Serbo-
Croatian, 0%Hungarian, 0%Pashto, 0%Mandalesh, 0%Tonga; Nyasa,
0%Dutch, 0%Norwegian, 0%Swedish, 0%Mixteco, 0%Wolof, 0%Kirundi; Rundi, 0%Tibetan, 0%
Chinese, Minnan (inc Taiwanese),
0%Armenian, 0%Czech, 0%Georgian, 0%Oriya, 0%Creole, 0%Greek, 0%
Sign-ASL for Deaf Blind,
0%Afrikaans, 0%Abkhazian; Abkhaz, 0%Quechua, 0%Twi, 0%Lithuanian,
0%Norwegian
Bokm?/td>, 0%Khmer, 0%Latin, 0%
Native American Indian, 0%
Sogdian, 0%
Russian, 4%
Cantonese, 3%
Amharic, 2%
Korean, 2%
Mandarin, 2%Hindi, 1%Oromo, 1%Other, 1%g Sogdian, 0%
Spanish, 61%
Somali, 7%
Vietnamese, 7%
Seattle Children’s Center for Diversity & Health Equity
• Formed in 2007
• Reports to President and Chief Operating OfficerReports to President and Chief Operating Officer
• 8FTE (6.5 internally funded)
• Internal and external oversight
• Three part function:
– safe and effective care for all patients
– community outreach and engagement
– workforce diversity and professional development
16
Measuring Equity
Keys to success
• Self-identified race ethnicity and language collectionSelf identified race, ethnicity and language collection is essential foundation
• Partner with your registration staff – Educate: how and why– Empower– Treat them like gold!– Ongoing QA processes
100%
Would have liked more involvement in decision making (Inpatient)
Measuring Equity: Family Experience Survey
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
%
2008
2009
2010
0%
10%
20%
30%
White Non-White Spanish Speaking
17
100%
Had important questions about child’s treatment wanted to discuss but did not (Ambulatory)
Measuring Equity: Family Experience Survey
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
2008
2009
2010
0%
10%
20%
30%
White Non-White Spanish Speaking
2010
Measuring Equity: Family Experience Survey
What have we accomplished?
• Equity included in hospital quality dashboard• Equity included in hospital quality dashboard
• Hospital awareness of disparities
• Hospital support and significant resources dedicated to equity
St ff d f lt i t t i i i i t ti• Staff and faculty interest in improving interactions across culture
18
Measuring Equity: Family Experience Survey
What are limitations?
• Mailed home 60+ question survey• Mailed home 60+ question survey
• Not a QI tool
• Our hospital focuses on individual survey questions, but the instrument was designed and validated for “dimensions of care” – multiple questions reflecting a patient’s experience within a domain of care – such as access, partnership, continuity, etc.
• What are effective interventions to impact this satisfaction?
Patient Navigator Program: Improving Satisfaction
Patient navigation is an intervention to improve satisfaction
• Culturally congruent patient navigators who are also• Culturally congruent patient navigators who are also certified medical interpreters
• Teach immigrant parents to effectively use health care system for chronic and complex pediatric disease
• Coach and empower parents to participate in care
19
Patient Navigator Program: Improving Satisfaction
25%
30%
10%
15%
20%
English Proficient
Spanish: No Navigator
Spanish: With Navigator
0%
5%
0%
Access to Care Partnership Between Family and Clinician
Continuity of Care
Measuring Equity: Expanding the Scope
Evaluating hospital clinical and safety metrics for equity
• Blood Stream Infections• Blood Stream Infections
• Time to Emergency Department Physician
• Pain Management
20
Measuring Equity: “Peeling an onion”
Blood Stream Infections (BSI’s)
I. BSI demographic evaluation initially indicates disproportionateI. BSI demographic evaluation initially indicates disproportionate rates for Latino
II. Further evaluation by clinical areas at high risk for BSI (Hem/Onc diagnoses, N=808; dialysis N=208) and by families’ residential zip codes.
III. Hem/Onc and zip code evaluation finds ethnic disparity does not exist
• More Latino patients come from Central and Eastern Washington where there is no competing children’s hospital.
IV. Dialysis evaluation underway for chronic dialysis patients
Measuring Equity: “Peeling an Onion”
Time to Emergency Department MDMedian time to MD,patients admitted to
Median time to MD, patients discharged topatients admitted to
hospitalpatients discharged to home
English Proficient 23 40
Limited English Proficient 24 44
Non‐Hispanic 23 40
Hispanic 23 45
White 23 40
Observe concerning differences in time to MD for specific languages:• Somali patients admitted• Russian patients discharged to home
Currently underway: stratification by acuity
Non‐White 23 43
21
Measuring Equity: “Peeling an onion”
Pain Management study
• Center supports faculty evaluation of association between E li h P fi i d d f i t dEnglish Proficiency and adequacy of pain assessment and treatment (Jimenez et al, J. Pain, accepted 2011.)
• Found LEP families received average of 1.5 medical interpretations per day.
• No significant differences found in median number of pain assessments per day or median pain scores.
• Further investigation and larger sample needed to evaluate• Further investigation and larger sample needed to evaluate possible differences in opioid analgesic prescribing (p=0.07).
• Additional next steps: focus groups homogeneous by language, race, ethnicity to determine cultural differences in the expectations of pain management.
Health Equity Improvement: The Baylor Health Care SystemThe Baylor Health Care System Vision and Experience
Jim Walton, DO, MBA Vice President & Chief Health Equity Officer
Baylor Health Care SystemDallas, Texas
“Tools for Measuring and Monitoring Equity in Quality: The Hospital Perspective”
January 27, 2-3:30 pm CST
22
Baylor Health Care System
• North Texas integrated health care system:
– 24 owned, leased, affiliated and short-stay hospitals , , y p
– 120+ primary care, specialty care, and senior health centers
– 17 ambulatory surgery centers
– 450+ employed physicians in the BHCS affiliated physician network, HealthTexas
• 20,000+ employees
• ~127 000 inpatient admissions annually
©2009 Baylor Health Care System
3/4/05 This is a test footer. 4343
• ~127,000 inpatient admissions annually
• >$3.8B net operating revenue (FY09)
Community vs. BHSC HospitalInpatient Race Distribution
Black inpatient use higher than Black population
©2009 Baylor Health Care System
3/4/05 This is a test footer. 44
White inpatient use higher than White population
23
Community vs. BHSC Hospital Inpatient Ethnicity Distribution
Hispanic inpatient use lower than Hispanic population
©2009 Baylor Health Care System
3/4/05 This is a test footer. 45
Office of Health Equity
• Office of Health Equity (OHE) developed in 2006
T d i ti i h lth• To reduce variation in health care access, care delivery and health outcomes due to:
• Race and ethnicity
• Income and education (i.e., socioeconomic status)
• Age
G d
©2009 Baylor Health Care System
3/4/05 This is a test footer. 46
• Gender
• Other personal characteristics (e.g., primary language skills)
24
• Design and implement an annual “BHCS Health Equity Performance Analysis” (HEPA) & Report:
Office of Health Equity: Goals
Performance Analysis (HEPA) & Report:
Quality of Care measures (Core Measures)
Experience of Care measures (Satisfaction)
Outcome measures (Mortality & Readmission)
• Utilize Health Equity Performance Report as a tool to focus
©2009 Baylor Health Care System
3/4/05 This is a test footer. 47
47
resources and efforts to reduce inequalities and improve quality
BHCS Analysis Methodology
For each equity measure: Patient population broken down into dichotomous Patient population broken down into dichotomous
variables • Race: White vs. Non-White
• Ethnicity: Hispanic vs. Non-Hispanic
• SES Proxy: Commercially Insured vs. Self-Pay/ Medicaid
Percentages of eligible patients calculated, and the differences between each dichotomous variable are
©2009 Baylor Health Care System
3/4/05 This is a test footer.
differences between each dichotomous variable are calculated
• Identify dichotomous variable differences that are statistically significant (p<=.05)
25
BHCS Health Equity PerformanceAnalysis - Dashboard
Baylor Health Care System - FY-10 Health Equity Performance Dashboard
Metric WHITE NON-WHITEEQUITY OF
CARE NON-HISPANIC HISPANIC
EQUITY OF CARE
AMI perfect care bundle (%) 97.9 97.4 = 97.8 98.1 =
HF perfect care bundle (%) 96 94.1 Favors White 95.5 93.9 =
PNE perfect care bundle (%) 92.1 91.8 = 91.9 92 =
SCIP perfect care bundle (%) 94.5 94.5 = 94.6 94 =
©2009 Baylor Health Care System
3/4/05 This is a test footer.
Inpatient overall satisfaction mean score
88.1 87.4 Favors White 87.9 88.9 Favors Hispanic
Emergency Department overall satisfaction mean score
87.5 84.2 Favors White 87.1 84.3Favors Non-
Hispanic
AMI=Acute Myocardial Infarction; HF=Heart Failure; PNE=Pneumonia; SCIP=Surgical Complication Infection Prevention
Health Equity Performance:ED Patient Satisfaction-Race
©2009 Baylor Health Care System
3/4/05 This is a test footer. 50
Persisting Racial
Inequity Observed
26
Health Equity Performance:ED Patient Satisfaction-Race
Baylor Hospitals
f iperforming worse than average
©2009 Baylor Health Care System
3/4/05 This is a test footer.
BHCS Health Equity Improvement Strategy
Establish Pilot intervention within 2 facilities Identify specific satisfaction survey questions
where race/ethnicity differences are magnified Develop local intervention team Review available literature to support evidence-based
intervention*
Establish new process sensitive metrics
©2009 Baylor Health Care System
3/4/05 This is a test footer.
Establish new process-sensitive metrics Collection of Health care language preference Use of Language lines &/or translators
*Hispanic satisfaction rating of health care quality compared to outcomes???????
27
Health Equity PerformanceDiabetes Care Management-Ethnicity
©2009 Baylor Health Care System
3/4/05 This is a test footer. 5310 % or more difference between Historically Advantaged and Disadvantaged patient populations observed in achievement of HgA1c=<7. (p=<0.05). 11 Private Clinics‐HealthTexas Provider Network
BHCS Health Equity Improvement Strategy
Establish Pilot intervention within 4 Clinics– Export tactics identified in local best practice –
Diabetes Equity Project• 4 private practice clinics within close proximity to culturally-
sensitive Diabetes Health Promoters • Available to 246 of 475 (52%) Hispanic patients from 11
clinics
Develop local intervention team
©2009 Baylor Health Care System
3/4/05 This is a test footer.
Develop local intervention team Review available literature to support evidence-based
intervention*
*Review of Literature for CHW-led Diabetes Care improvement project??????
28
Health Equity PerformanceDiabetes Care Management
©2009 Baylor Health Care System
3/4/05 This is a test footer.
Minnesota Community Measurement and Minnesota Department of Health. 55.0% (A1c < 7) 2009 data - Includes patients from 1/1/2008 through 12/31/2009 with two or more visits coded with a diabetes ICD-9 code, and has been seen within 7/1/2008 through 12/31/2009 once regardless of any diagnosis code . Measured annually. http://www.health.state.mn.us/diabetes/pdf/FactSheet2010.pdf.
HealthTexas Provider Network Decision Support EHR Audit Report Dashboard. Percentage of Patients with A1c Control. Includes patients with two or more patient visits at least 7 days apart. Measured every six months through June 2010, then quarterly.
Health Equity improvement is a shared Baylor
Quality performance strategy
Conclusions
Module 3:Health Equity Performance Improvement Exercise
Quality performance strategy
Hospital & Ambulatory Care health disparities
exist as do inequities in health care access
Improving Health Equity is consistent with the
Baylor mission
©2009 Baylor Health Care System
3/4/05 This is a test footer. 56
Baylor mission
Best practices exists and should be piloted
before broad dissemination
29
Question and Answer PeriodQuestion and Answer Period
Tools for Measuring and Monitoring Equity in Quality: The Hospital PerspectiveQuality: The Hospital Perspective
Susana Rinderle, MAManager, Diversity, Equity & Inclusion
(DEI) at University of New Mexico Hospitals,
Albuquerque, NM
James Walton, DO, MBAVice President and Chief
Health Equity Officer, Baylor Health Care System, Dallas, TX
Sarah Rafton, MSWDirector, Center for Diversity and Health
Equity, Seattle Children’s Hospital,
Seattle, WA
Joseph R. Betancourt, MD, MPH
Director, The Disparities Solutions Center at MGH
Moderator
30
For more information about
the Disparities Leadership Program
and current application deadlines
www.mghdisparitiessolutions.org
or
http://www2.massgeneral.org/disparitiessolutions/dlprogram.html
Thank you for your participation.