Rep. Tom Marino (PA-10)

Notable Headlines...............................................................2Editorials.............................................................................2Budget Issues......................................................................3Business and Consumer Issues...........................................8Campaign Finance Issues....................................................8Crime & Public Safety Issues...............................................9Economic and Financial Issues............................................9Education Issues................................................................10Energy Issues....................................................................11Environmental Issues........................................................12Ethics Issues......................................................................12Foreign Policy Issues – Iraq, Afghanistan, Iran, North Korea..........................................................................................12Gay and Lesbian Issues.....................................................14Gun Issues.........................................................................14Health Care Issues.............................................................14Immigration and Border Issues..........................................15Israel.................................................................................15Labor and Working Family Issues......................................16Other Social Issues............................................................16Stem Cells.........................................................................17Tax Issues..........................................................................17Tea Party...........................................................................18Transportation Issues........................................................18Women’s Issues.................................................................18Miscellaneous....................................................................182012 Campaign.................................................................21

2

Notable Headlines

NEPA Tea Party Launches Robocalls Against Barletta, Marino [politicspa.com, 10/01/11]

Marino remarks stir heat, but he sees no problem [The Times Leader, 4/01/11]

Editorials

Sunbury Daily Item: Marino’s Sleight of Hand

In December 2011, a Sunbury Daily Item editorial criticized Marino for supporting extending the payroll tax cut but not supporting raising other taxes to pay for the relief.

The editorial said that Marino’s position would protect the bank accounts of millionaires. The paper opined, “We call upon Congressman Marino to clarify his position so that working and middle class families throughout the Valley know where their elected representative stands on an automatic tax increase they all face at the end of this month.”

The editorial also blamed political leaders for not taking control of the evolving wealth gap and pointed to TARP allowing the wealthy to escape “mostly unscathed.” [Sunbury Daily Item, 12/09/11]

Standard-Speaker/Times-Tribune: Marino More Interested in Stopping Obama Than Creating Jobs

In December 2011, the Standard-Speaker/Times-Tribune editorial board criticized Marino for being a “[member] of the hard-right House Republican freshman class that is as much interested in stymieing Obama as in helping to create jobs.” The paper encouraged Marino to support the president’s jobs plan for the good of his district, regardless of his party’s politics. [Times-Tribune, 11/30/11; Standard Speaker, 12/4/11]

Times-Tribune: “NEPA Chokes on Poison Pill”

In September 2011, the Times Tribune published an editorial criticizing Marino for supporting the House stopgap bill that provided $3.7 billion in disaster aid by cutting unrelated programs.

The board wrote that, “Tying disaster relief to the demise of unrelated projects for which the House leadership has a philosophical dislike is bad enough. That Mr. Marino … would stand for it rather than standing up for the region is worse.” [The Times-Tribune, Editorial, 09/24/11]

Budget Issues

Touted Balanced Budget

3

In November 2011, Marino supported the Balanced Budget Amendment and said that “everything is on the table” when talking about reducing debt.

Marino called for downsizing the government, and drastically cutting spending, taxes, and regulations to reduce the debt and said that the defense budget, law enforcement, and benefits to senior citizens and veterans should be the last to go. Marino said, “Congress can always pass a balanced budget and we have passed laws calling for one. But Congress has only passed a balanced budget a few times in the last five decades. When it is inconvenient, they have waived it. If we have a constitutional amendment, we have to follow it because it will be the letter of the law.” [Times Leader, 11/22/11 ]

Claimed Reid Misled Americans, Used Scare Tactics on Disaster Victims

In September 2011, Marino criticized Harry Reid for using scare tactics in the debate about disaster relief and for stating that FEMA was days from running out of money.

Marino said, “Either the Obama administration and Harry Reid are incompetent or they think they can pull the wool over the eyes of Americans, or worse, resort to scare tactics to get their way on their pet projects once again. People in my district are still sleeping in shelters, have no idea what their next step is and cringe every time it starts to rain…. I think it is despicable to prey on the emotions of our most vulnerable.” [northcentralpa.com, 09/28/11]

Editorial: “NEPA Chokes on Poison Pill”

In September 2011, the Times Tribune published an editorial criticizing Marino for supporting the House stopgap bill that provided $3.7 billion in disaster aid by cutting unrelated programs.

The board wrote that, “Tying disaster relief to the demise of unrelated projects for which the House leadership has a philosophical dislike is bad enough. That Mr. Marino … would stand for it rather than standing up for the region is worse.” [The Times-Tribune, Editorial, 09/24/11]

Marino Op-Ed: “People Are Hurting”

In September 2011, Marino wrote an op-ed in which he said federal disaster aid should be matched by cuts in government spending.

Marino said that the first responsibility was to get citizens back into their homes, and only then “do we go back to the drawing table and find the cuts needed to offset the increase in disaster assistance funding.”Marino also called to cut waste and duplicative programs, writing that “As vice chairman of the House Homeland Security Subcommittee on Emergency Preparedness, Response and Communications, I can tell you of one glaring example. There are 17 separate federal entities that administer grants for emergency preparedness with budgets totaling $34 billion. I am convinced that by consolidating some of those responsibilities we will save hundreds of millions of tax dollars. That is only one example of the thousands of areas where we can save resources – in manpower, office space, related office expenses, and time.” [northcentralpa.com, 09/23/11]

Agreed With Cantor’s Position on Disaster Relief

4

In August 2011, Marino agreed with Rep. Eric Cantor’s position that any disaster relief funding should be offset by budget reductions, in particular “educated cuts.”

Marino said that “We have to offset this by responsible cuts. It’s just that we’re not smart enough. We haven’t learned over the years that we need to put some money in a reserve. When you say reserve or put money in a bank for a rainy day, people in Washington look at you like you’re crazy.” [Times Leader, 09/01/11]

Voted for Final Debt Ceiling Compromise Legislation

In August 2011, Marino voted for the final debt ceiling compromise legislation, the Budget Control Act of 2011.

The framework would cut $917 billion in spending over a decade, raise the debt limit initially by $900 billion and assign a special congressional committee, with members from the House and the Senate and appointed by congressional leadership, to find another $1.5 trillion in deficit savings by late November.

If Congress met that deadline and deficit target, or voted to send a balanced budget amendment to the states, the debt ceiling would be raised an additional $1.5 trillion. The plan guaranteed a vote on the balanced budget amendment between October and the end of 2011.

If Congress failed to take either step, or debt savings of at least $1.2 trillion were not produced, the plan allows the president to obtain a $1.2 trillion debt ceiling increase. That would trigger automatic spending cuts across the government – including in defense and Medicare – to take effect starting in 2013. The Medicare cuts would only affect Provider reimbursements. The legislation included no revenue increases.

The bill was passed by the full House, 269-161. [Bloomberg, 8/01/11; S 356, 8/01/11]

Voted Against Reid’s Debt Ceiling Plan

In July 2011, Marino voted against Sen. Harry Reid’s plan to raise the debt ceiling.

Reid’s plan called for raising the debt limit by $2.4 trillion, requiring no additional debt ceiling vote until after the 2012 election. 

The plan included $1.2 trillion in discretionary spending cuts over 10 years, mandatory spending cuts of $100 billion, $1 trillion in savings from winding down combat operations in Iraq and Afghanistan, and $400 billion in interest savings. The legislation included no revenue increases.

The CBO score of Reid’s plan said it would reduce the deficit by $2.2 trillion. The bill was rejected by the full House, 173-246. [New York Times, 7/25/11; HR 2693, 7/30/11]

Said Boehner Debt Ceiling Plan was “An Important Step Forward”

In July 2011, Marino voted for Speaker John Boehner’s debt ceiling plan.

5

Marino said, “I believe this legislation is an important step forward for our nation…It calls for the approval of a balanced budget amendment which is the best guarantee that we will never again find ourselves in such a financial disaster.” [northcentralpa.com, 7/30/11]

Voted in Favor of Boehner’s Debt Ceiling Plan

In July 2011, Marino voted in favor of Speaker John Boehner’s plan to raise the debt ceiling.

Boehner’s plan called for an immediate debt ceiling raise of $900 billion, spending cuts of $917 billion over 10 years, and an additional debt ceiling vote in six months.  The legislation contained no revenue increases.

Under Boehner’s plan, the second debt ceiling raise was conditional on the passage of a balanced budget amendment by both Houses of Congress and the creation of a select joint committee on deficit reduction.

The CBO score of Boehner’s plan said it would reduce the deficit by $850 billion. The bill was approved by the full house, 218-210. [ABC News, 7/29/11; S 627, 7/29/11]

Marino: Debt Ceiling Debate is About Pragmatism v. Idealism, Not Ideology

In July 2011, Marino said of the debt ceiling debate, “To many, this gridlock may appear to be the result of a class of two opposing political viewpoints. It may have started out that way. But the severity of our economic crisis has surpassed philosophical differences. It now comes down to pragmatism versus idealism.

“When we are in a state of prosperity, we have the luxury of basing governmental decisions on ideology…But our national debt is the equivalent of $45,000 per person or $127,500 per taxpayer. There is no room for ideology.

“Regardless of our viewpoints, our future, and that of our children and grandchildren, is in jeopardy unless we all put aside our political aspirations and get down to work in Washington.” [The Daily Review, 7/24/11]

Marino: Raising the Debt Ceiling is Inevitable

In a July 2011 op-ed, Marino wrote, “Raising the debt ceiling is inevitable. Raising the debt ceiling without comparable spending cuts and a balanced budget amendment is irresponsible.” [Times-Leader, 7/20/11]

Marino: Obama “Conveys a Sense of Hopelessness and Fear”

In a July 2011 op-ed, Marino wrote, “It is sad that President Obama, who rode the mantra of hope and change to the Oval Office, offers neither at this critical crossroads. He conveys a sense of hopelessness and fear, and stubbornly refuses to change his direction to meet the needs of the nation…

6

“President Obama made it obvious that he demands compromise while offering none. He insists on tax increases and when he didn’t get his way during last week’s talks, he left the room, the childhood equivalent of taking your ball and going home.” [Times-Leader, 7/20/11]

Said Cut, Cap and Balance Vote was Not Symbolic

In July 2011, Marino said of his Cut, Cap and Balance vote, “Nothing is symbolic for me. I know why I am here…The voters sent me here to cut down the size of government, stop the spending, keep taxes low and to create jobs, and that is why I am voting the way I am voting on this.”

Marino also commented on the possibility of a compromise plan and said, “As far as what is going to happen in the future, I am not ready to make any concessions or decisions on how I am going to vote.” [Times-Leader, 7/19/11]

Voted in Favor of Cut, Cap and Balance Plan

In July 2011, Marino voted in favor of the Cut, Cap and Balance Act, legislation requiring deep spending cuts, a federal spending cap and a balanced budget amendment in order to raise the federal debt ceiling.

Under Cut, Cap and Balance, discretionary spending in fiscal year 2012 would be reduced below fiscal year 2008 levels except for Defense, Homeland Security and Veterans affairs. The plan provided a universal spending cap after 2012. The legislation contained no revenue increases.

The bill was approved by the full House, 234-190. [New York Times, 7/21/11; HR 2560, 7/19/11]

Said Obama Was Using “Scare Tactics”

In July 2011, Marino said Obama’s warning that Social Security checks may not go out in August if the debt limit was not raised was nothing more than a scare tactic. [wetmtv.com, 7/13/11]

Said Obama Should Propose Budget Plan “Instead of Spending Time Spreading Falsehoods”

In July 2011, Marino said, “Instead of spending time spreading falsehoods to seniors, this administration should propose a plan that could pass Congress…I think this only shows how desperate this man is to get his way and to raise taxes.” [pocononews.net, 7/13/11]

Signed Cut, Cap, Balance Pledge

In July 2011, Marino joined with more than 40 conservative groups and 20 members of congress to sign the “Cut, Cap, Balance” pledge, committing “to opposing any effort to raise the debt ceiling that does not come with substantial spending cuts beginning in fiscal 2012, enforceable spending caps and congressional passage of an amendment to the US Constitution that would require a balance budget, spending limits and a super-majority for rising taxes.”

Marino said, “This is a necessary approach to tackling our nation’s financial problems…The deep budget cuts and the cap on spending will help reduce the deficit immediately. Passage of a balanced budget amendment will prevent Washington from saddling our children and grandchildren with a mountain of

7

debt because the federal government will no longer have the ability to recklessly spend beyond its means.” [Politico, 6/22/11; northcentralpa.com, 7/08/11]

Signed Letter Against Recess Appointments

In June 2011, Marino signed a letter to House leadership “requesting all appropriate measures be taken to prevent any recess appointment by the President for the remainder of the 112th Congress.” The coalition signing the letter “offered to man the floor in order to prevent either body of Congress to go into recess.” [Office of Congressman Landry, 6/16/11]

Voted Against Clean Debt Ceiling Raise

In May 2011, Marino voted against HR 1954, a clean federal debt ceiling raise of $2.4 trillion.

The bill was rejected by the full House, 97-318. [HR 1954, 5/31/11]

Marino Introduced Federal Hiring Freeze Bill

In May 2011, Marino introduced HR 1779, the Federal Hiring Freeze Act of 2011, a bill that would freeze most federal hiring until the federal deficit is eliminated.

According to a press release from Marino’s congressional office the proposed freeze would affect all federal agencies except for: the U.S. Postal Service and Postal Regulatory Commission; federal law-enforcement positions; the reassignment of personnel within the same agency; short-term, seasonal hiring; or transitional positions involving a new presidential administration.

The current federal workforce is 2.8 million, according to the Office of Personnel and Management. Of that total, 2.7 million workers are employed by the executive branch. [Office of Congressman Marino, 5/05/11]

Voted Against Legislation that Would Prevent Congress and the President from Receiving Pay During A Shutdown

In 2011, Marino opposed legislation that would prevent members of Congress and President Obama from receiving pay in the event of a government shutdown. The legislation also prevented those officials from retroactively receiving any lost pay. [goerie.com, 4/04/11]

Called Ryan Budget a “Sound Blueprint” for the Nation

In 2011, Marino, while not fully committing to the Ryan budget plan, called the plan a “comprehensive budget proposal … a sound blueprint that will take our country in a new direction.”

“There are many facets to this detailed plan, and I would like the opportunity to review carefully […] In the meantime, my focus remains fixed on working out a spending plan that will carry us through fiscal year 2011.” [Hazelton Times, 4/12/11]

Local Professor: Shutdown Could be Avoided if Marino Would “Stop Campaigning”

8

In April 2011, Henrite Hendriks, a political science professor in Marino’s district, told Marino and other freshman Republican Congressmen to “stop campaigning” and learn to negotiate to avoid a government shutdown.

“They seem to be in campaign mode. In the end, I’m not sure who the public will blame, but not being able to negotiate could come back and haunt those freshmen,” Hendriks said. [The Daily Item, 4/09/11]

Business and Consumer Issues

Opposed Medco - Express Scripts Merger

In July 2011, Marino expressed concerns regarding a proposed merger of pharmacy benefit management giants Express Scripts and Medco.

Marino said, “It is critical that we ensure a level playing field for small businesses to allow them to create jobs and pull us out of our current economic crisis…I am concerned that this merger further consolidates a market that is already skewed in favor of giant PBMs. This will ultimately lead to fewer community pharmacies and less options for seniors to receive their medication.” [northcentralpa.com, 7/22/11]

Campaign Finance Issues

Took $500 from Goldman Sachs

In February 2011, Politico Reported that Marino had taken $500 from the Goldman Sachs Political Action Committee. [Politico – Huddle, 2/22/11]

Marino Received Boost in Corporate PAC Donations

In February 2011, The Wall Street Journal reported that Marino received a boost from corporate PACs following his election to Congress. According to the report, “Since Nov. 23, businesses groups have thrown $41,500 his way, according to a Washington Wire tally. That included a $2,500 check from Philadelphia-based Comcast Corp., the firm’s first donation to Mr. Marino last cycle. The cable giant backed had donated $4,500 to Mr. Carney’s campaign committee in 2010, according to FEC filings.” [Wall Street Journal, 2/1/11]

Marino’s First Fundraiser in D.C. Cost $80,000

In January 2011, Marino was part of a group of freshman Republicans who held a swanky fundraiser at the W Hotel in Downtown Washington, DC. The fundraiser cost $80,000, which included $25,000 to have LeAnn Rimes perform, $22,000 for catering and lighting and $10,000 for “floral expense and event design.” [Politico, 1/31/11]

Marino Hosted Lavish GOP Fundraiser Immediately Upon Arriving in Washington

9

Before being sworn in as a Congressman, Marino hosted a GOP fundraiser at the posh W Hotel in Washington, DC, immediately undermining the Republican message of fiscal responsibility. The event was paid for the PAC America’s New Majority, of which Marino was a member. The event cost $2,500 a plate, offered a $50,000 VIP package and featured music star LeAnn Rimes as the night’s entertainment. [Fox News, 1/04/11]

Crime & Public Safety Issues

Supported Synthetic Drug Act

In December 2011, Marino voted for the Synthetic Drug Control Act, a measure already put into place in several states, including Pennsylvania, which would put a ban on synthetic drugs.

Marino supported the nationwide ban and said, “It takes an illegal drug out of legitimate retail stores that is killing people, that is killing our young people… There is no known reason scientifically or medically that there is any use for this drug other than dangerously getting high.” [Times Leader, 12/9/11]

Economic and Financial Issues

Standard-Speaker/Times-Tribune: Marino More Interested in Stopping Obama Than Creating Jobs

In December 2011, the Standard-Speaker/Times-Tribune editorial board criticized Marino for being a “[member] of the hard-right House Republican freshman class that is as much interested in stymieing Obama as in helping to create jobs.” The paper encouraged Marino to support the president’s jobs plan for the good of his district, regardless of his party’s politics. [Times-Tribune, 11/30/11; Standard Speaker, 12/4/11]

Issued Statement Calling for Senate to Pass “Reducing Regulatory Burdens Act”

In October 2011, Marino issued a joint statement urging the Senate to pass the Reducing Regulatory Burdens Act, which passed in the House in March by a vote of 292-130.

The bill would amend laws that would regulation pesticides under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act. [Post-Gazette, 10/31/11]

Marino: The Stimulus Did Not Create Jobs

In a July 2011 op-ed, Marino wrote, “The $800 billion stimulus did not create jobs, did not convey a sense of financial security for the middle class, nor provide an impetus for small business to invest and expand. A bloated federal government squeezes out private investment. Tax increases thwart business expansion, stifle job creation and lead to deeper cuts in employment.” [Times-Leader, 7/20/11]

A Decrease In Number Of Employees Doesn’t Necessarily Mean Smaller Government If Contract Spending Goes Up In Response

10

                                                    William R. Dougan, president of the National Federation of Federal Employees and chairman of the Federal Workers Alliance testified at a congressional hearing on the federal workforce that, “If I can leave you with only one message today, let it be this: You do not measure the size of government by the number of federal workers, you measure the size of government in dollars and cents.” The Washington Post reported, “The reason? Reducing the number of employees doesn't necessarily mean smaller government. It may mean hiring private contractors for the work.” Rep. Stephen Lynch said, “As a result of this shift, any purported savings are more than likely negated by an increase in contract spending.” There are more than 10.5 million contractors and grantees, nearly four times the number of federal civilian (including postal) employees, Lynch added. [The Washington Post, 5/27/11]

Non-Profit Group Said Most Recent Increases In Federal Workforce Were Related To Physical Safety And Veterans Care

In May 2011, the National Journal site GovExec.com reported that Max Stier, president of the nonprofit Partnership for Public Service, said Marino’s legislation is an ineffective way of making government less wasteful. Stier said, “If you look at the hiring that's occurred in recent times, it's almost entirely around physical safety or taking care of our veterans. You have to ask the question, do you really want to foreclose on our abilities to meet those critical needs?" [National Journal: GovExec.com, 5/06/11]

Education Issues

Supported the Revival of a School Voucher System in the District of Columbia

In 2011, Marino voted in support of legislation that would revive a school voucher system in DC that would provide more students with scholarships of $8,000 to $12,000 annually for tuition costs at private elementary and secondary schools in the D.C. area. 

The legislation was estimated to cost $100 million over five years in deficit spending. [goerie.com, 4/04/11]

Energy Issues

Criticized Obama for Delaying Decision on Keystone Pipeline

In November 2011, Marino said that Obama was putting politics ahead of job creation and energy policy by delaying a decision on whether to approve the Keystone pipeline, which would carry oil from Alberta through Nebraska down to Texas.

Marino said that if the pipeline was not built, oil could be sent to China. He said, “This poorly thought decision underscores his failure to lead and makes it clear that the president’s only goal is to be re-elected. In addition to creating thousands of desperately needed jobs, this pipeline would have helped diversify our

11

nation’s energy sources and would have reduced our dependence on foreign countries, particularly unstable countries in the Middle East.” [Times Leader, 11/18/11]

Declined Comment on New Drilling Regulations

In November 2011, Marino declined to comment on new gas drilling regulations that would impact water to 15 million residents and said that the decision would be up to the Delaware River Basin Commission. [Pocono Record, 11/18/11]

NEPA Tea Party Launched Robocall Campaign Against Energy Policies

In October 2011, the Northeast Pennsylvania Tea Party launched a campaign against Marino for his support of legislation that created tax incentives and subsidies to encourage the use and production of natural gas vehicles.

NEPA Tea Party Leader Orbin said “it’s disappointing to see them backing these types of plans whey they say they back the free market.” The bill would provide $5 billion in subsidies over a 5 year period, to which the Tea Party said, “The Tea Party and the conservative movement did not send conservative Members to Washington, DC to have them ‘gift’ taxpayer dollars (in the form of subsidies) to political entrepreneurs like T. Boone Pickens or to further interfere with the free market.” [politicspa.com, 10/01/11]

“Tea and Gas Don’t Mix Well”

In October 2011, the Northeast Pennsylvania Tea Party launched a campaign against Marino for his support of legislation that created tax incentives and subsidies to encourage the use and production of natural gas vehicles.

The Daily Item article stated that Marino was a huge backer of the free market, but “ he also was an even bigger backer of creating jobs and encouraging the natural gas industry” [dailyitem.com, 10/3/11

 

Marino: “Return to Our 2008 Levels of Drilling”

In June 2011, Marino criticized Obama’s decision to release oil from the Strategic Petroleum Supply and stated his support for increased oil drilling in the US to create new jobs.

“It’s time we started to put our country first and did something to help put Americans back to work…I’d like to see a return to our 2008 levels of drilling.” [Office of Congressman Marino, 6/25/11]

Environmental Issues

Criticized Obama for Delaying Decision on Keystone Pipeline

12

In November 2011, Marino said that Obama was putting politics ahead of job creation and energy policy by delaying a decision on whether to approve the Keystone pipeline, which would carry oil from Alberta through Nebraska down to Texas.

Marino said that if the pipeline was not built, oil could be sent to China. He said, “This poorly thought decision underscores his failure to lead and makes it clear that the president’s only goal is to be re-elected. In addition to creating thousands of desperately needed jobs, this pipeline would have helped diversify our nation’s energy sources and would have reduced our dependence on foreign countries, particularly unstable countries in the Middle East.” [Times Leader, 11/18/11]

Declined Comment on New Drilling Regulations

In November 2011, Marino declined to comment on new gas drilling regulations that would impact water to 15 million residents and said that the decision would be up to the Delaware River Basin Commission. [Pocono Record, 11/18/11]

Ethics Issues

Foreign Policy Issues – Iraq, Afghanistan, Iran, North Korea

Supported Proposal to Cut Funding for International Family Planning Program

In October 2011, Marino supported a proposal to cut a UN family planning program that operates in developing countries.

Marino, a member of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, voted in committee to cut funds for the program. He said, “By contributing to the UNFPA we are borrowing money from China, 42 cents on the dollar, and giving it to the United Nations, which turns around and gives it to countries like China to support its one-child policy including abortion. This is state-sanctioned murder and the kind of thing that Americans are screaming about.”

Marino also backed a bill that would strip funding from Planned Parenthood, eliminate funding for a national family planning program, cut funding to a teen pregnancy prevention initiative, and direct money to abstinence only education programs. [Times-Leader, 10/9/11]

Had Serious Concerns about Removing Troops from Afghanistan

In June 2011, Marino commented that he had “serious concerns” about Obama’s plan to remove troops from Afghanistan in 2012, and that he “worried that the decision was based on discontent with a near-decade-old war rather than clear military strategy.” He said the success of surge “will all be for naught if we pull out our troops prematurely.” [The Times Leader, 6/23/11]

Against Pentagon Funding Cuts to District Manufacturer

13

In June 2011, Marino supported the annual retool of the 70 MIA2 Abrams Tank. Parts of the tank are constructed at General Dynamics Land Systems, a manufacturer in Marion’s district that employs 250 people. The Pentagon “called for a three-year suspension of work on the tank starting in 2013 because it has enough renovated units and estimates the production halt would save $800 million.” [Scranton Times-Tribune, 6/15/11]

Marino on Libya: “We Can’t Afford to Continue to Play Cop of the World”

In June 2011, Marino voted the house resolution limiting US military involvement in Libya. Marino said, “We can’t afford to continue to play cop of the world.” [Office of Congressman Marino, 6/03/11]

Criticized for Not Knowing Libya Is a Country in Africa

In 2011, Marino was criticized in the media for statements he made criticizing the President about his involvement in Libya. During his comments, a portion of his statement alluded to him not knowing that Libya was a country in Africa.

Marino reportedly stated that “the bottom line is I wish the president would have told us, talked to Congress about what is the plan. Is there a plan? Is the mission to take Gadhafi out?”

“Where does it stop?” he continued. “Do we go into Africa next? I don’t want to sound callous or cold, but this could go on indefinitely around the world.” [The Times Leader, 4/01/11]

Marino Approved of Obama’s Handling of the Egyptian Revolution

In February 2011, Marino supported the President’s handling of the revolution in Egypt. Marino said, “It’s not a total surprise. It’s the best thing for the country. I anticipate there will be stability, and I think the United States did exactly what it should have done…Who knows what was going on behind the scenes? But as a Republican, I think the President handled the situation as best as it could be handled without inflaming anything, and I think it paid off.” [Politics PA, 2/14/11]

Marino Approved of Obama’s Handling of the Egyptian Conflict

In February 2011, Marino said he approved of how Obama handled the conflict in Egypt. Marino said, “It’s not a total surprise. It’s the best thing for the country. I anticipate there will be stability, and I think the United States did exactly what it should have done,” said Marino. “Who knows what was going on behind the scenes? But as a Republican, I think the President handled the situation as best as it could be handled without inflaming anything, and I think it paid off.” [Politics PA, 2/14/ 11 ]

Gay and Lesbian Issues

Gun Issues

14

Health Care Issues

Honored by RetireSafe

In December 2011, RetireSafe honored Marino for his efforts to protect senior citizens. The group, which described itself as nonpartisan, was, according to Roll Call, “led by former Bush and Reagan administration officials, small-government activists and pharmaceutical industry lobbyists and consultants.”

Jesse Ferguson of the DCCC said, “Representative Tom Marino voted to end Medicare and nearly double health care costs for seniors, and there is no special-interest group that can pull the wool over Pennsylvania seniors’ eyes about it. The only award that Representative Tom Marino deserves is one for being the favorite of corporate special interests and leaving Pennsylvania seniors out in the cold.” [Daily Item, 12/06/11]

Records Bill Proved Contentious

In November 2011, Marino’s bill, the Safeguarding Access for Every Medicare Patient Act, proved contentious because it would deprive patients of the right to seek compensation over faulty electronic records and would remove incentives for records vendors and health care professionals to make improvements.

Marino said that the bill would create a system to report errors in electronic records without the admission of a mistake being used as legal admission of wrongdoing. Marino said, “Many providers are reluctant to use electronic records because they believe the practice will make them more vulnerable to unnecessary legal action.” An attorney said that the legal immunity that Marino put into the bill would discourage improvements to faulty electronic record systems. [Times Leader, 11/27/11]

Introduced Bill to Benefit Independent Pharmacies

In June 2011, Marino introduced HR 1946, the Preserving Our Hometown Independent Pharmacies Act, “which would allow independent pharmacies to band together and negotiate reimbursement rates on a more level playing field.”

Marino said, “It simply gives independent pharmacies the ability and the opportunity to fairly negotiate a price for which they buy pharmaceuticals…Corporations have an advantage because of their size. Independently-owned pharmacies do not buy nearly as much in one-shot volumes as corporations do. That should not be a deterrent in negotiating a fairer price.” [Citizens Voice, 6/21/11]

Marino Met Opposition On Health Care At Town Hall

In May 2011, The Times-Tribune reported that in a town hall meeting in which Marino addressed legislation to cut federal government spending, he faced strong opposition from citizens concerned about issues such as health care, Social Security and alternative energy studies. Marino said the Ryan budget is “at least a starting point.” Marino said that Social Security and Medicare won't exist in a couple decades if spending continues the way it has been. [The Times-Tribune, 5/17/11]

15

Immigration and Border Issues

Said He Would Pursue Investigation into Local Immigration Issue

In July 2011, Marino said he was going to ask whether U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement will pursue those responsible for bringing 12 foreign nationals – most of whom were suspected illegal aliens – to a job site in Kelly Township, Union County. Marino said that if he did not receive satisfactory answers, he might request a hearing before the House committees on Homeland Security, Judiciary, or Foreign Affairs.

Marino said the Obama administration has put immigration on the back burner. He said, “The front-line agents are the best I’ve ever worked with…But they take their orders from on high. It doesn’t seem to be as aggressive, to a great extent, as it was with the Bush administration.” [Times-Leader, 7/25/11]

Marino Said “Dream Act” Was About “Lawlessness”

In May 2011, Marino issued a statement about the Dream Act:  “The President's Dream Act is not about diversity or opportunity. It's not about compassion or fairness. It's about lawlessness.” [Office of Congressman Marino, 5/11/11]

Israel

Returned From Israel With Fresh Perspective On Middle East

In August 2011, Marino traveled to Israel on a trip funded by the American Israel Education Foundation.

The delegation met with political and business representatives including Israeli PM Netanyahu, Israeli President Peres, Palestinian President Abbas, and Palestinian PM Fayyad. Marino affirmed that he backs Israel “100 percent”. [Sun Gazette, 8/27/11]

Labor and Working Family Issues

Union Workers Protested Outside Marino’s District Office

In August 2011, union workers protested outside Marino’s office in a mock funeral procession because he was not voting on job creating legislation.

Marino said, “I understand their frustration about the lack of good-paying jobs because I agree with them. We do need to create jobs - not government jobs, but household-sustaining, private-sector jobs. That's why I continue to fight in Washington to cut government spending, downsize Washington, and to keep taxes low is the only way we can stimulate the economy, and make it more attractive for companies to

16

expand and invest. I respect their right to protest and their freedom of speech. We welcome them to our open house next week in Williamsport where we can have a nice conversation. I just ask them to leave the coffin at home.” [sungazette.com, 8/26/11]

Marino: Eliminating Depts. Of Energy and Education Will Create Jobs

In September 2011, Marino cited job growth as the most important issue for Northeastern Pennsylvania and supports the elimination the Departments of Energy and Education to achieve that goal.

“And I’m amazed when some of these people say to me, ‘I don’t care about my children, I don’t care about my grandchildren, don’t touch my Social Security.’ And I say, ‘Do you understand what you just said?’ And I’ll have people say to me, ‘I want you to cut, I want you to cut like crazy in Washington, but oh, by the way, don’t cut this program, I need it.’ And again I say to them, ‘Do you understand what you’re saying?’” [Times-Leader, 09/01/11]

Other Social Issues

Marino Banned Video And Audio Recording At Town Halls

In May 2011, The Times-Tribune reported that Renita Fennick, Marino's press secretary, would not allow a man who would not identify himself to enter the congressman's LaPlume Township town hall May 16 with a video camera. The man was allowed in without the camera. Fennick said, “People can come in and speak. We're not preventing freedom of speech,” She declined to elaborate further on the ban. “I don't really want to participate in the story,” she said. [The Times-Tribune, 5/25/11]

Stem Cells

Tax Issues

Citizen’s Voice: Marino Voted to Impose Major Tax Increase and Eliminate Benefits

In December 2011, the Citizen’s Voice criticized Marino for opposing a two-month extension of the payroll tax cut and unemployment benefits. The paper accused him of not practicing what he preached by voting to “impose a major tax increase on over 160 million working Americans.” The editorial urged Marino to “forgo rigid ideology for the benefit of the people” in the future. [citizensvoice.com, 12/22/11 ]

Sunbury Daily Item: Marino’s Sleight of Hand

In December 2011, a Sunbury Daily Item editorial criticized Marino for supporting extending the payroll tax cut but not supporting raising other taxes to pay for the relief.

17

The editorial said that Marino’s position would protect the bank accounts of millionaires. The paper opined, “We call upon Congressman Marino to clarify his position so that working and middle class families throughout the Valley know where their elected representative stands on an automatic tax increase they all face at the end of this month.”

The editorial also blamed political leaders for not taking control of the evolving wealth gap and pointed to TARP allowing the wealthy to escape “mostly unscathed.” [Sunbury Daily Item, 12/09/11]

Did Not Oppose Payroll Tax Cut, Did Not Believe in a Surcharge on Millionaires

In November 2011, Marino said that he did not oppose extending the payroll tax cut but believed that a surcharge on millionaires would hurt job creation efforts.

Marino said, “The federal government does not tax too little, it spends too much. This economy will not turn around until we cut federal spending and downsize Washington to reduce the debt while keeping taxes low. I am glad the President acknowledges the positive effects of a tax cut like the payroll tax holiday, but there is not much use to it if it is paid for with a permanent tax increase.” [Times Leader, 11/30/11]

Favored Payroll Tax Cut

In December 2011, Marino said that he favored an extension to cut Social Security payroll taxes but did not confirm if he would vote for an expansion. [Times-Tribune, 12/3/11]

Signed Letter Saying He Was Open to Tax Increases

In November 2011, Marino was one of 40 Republicans to join 60 Democrats in a letter to the Congressional “Super Committee” that said “all options” should be included in a deficit reduction package, including increasing revenues.

The letter stated, “To succeed, all options for mandatory and discretionary spending and revenues must be on the table. In addition, we know from other bipartisan frameworks that a target of some $4 trillion in deficit reduction is necessary to stabilize our debt as a share of the economy and assure America’s fiscal well-being.” [thinkprogress.org, 11/02/11]

Tea Party

Tea Party Rallied in Support of Budget Votes

In March 2011, the Tea Party held a rally outside Marino’s office in ‘support of his opposition to a federal budget compromise and for opposing any further continuing resolutions. [The Times Tribune, 4/01/11]

Transportation Issues

18

Women’s Issues

Spoke of “Voices From the Womb” Event

In October 2011, Marino spoke at the “Voices From the Womb” event before 100 anti-abortion rights activists.

All 535 members of Congress were invited to attend the event, and only four members spoke, as well as a representative from one office. [americanindepent.com, 10/13/11]

Sponsored Legislation Overturning Roe v. Wade

In June 2011, Marino cosponsored the Life at Conception Act, overturning Roe v. Wade and ending “the nation’s policy of unlimited abortion on demand.”

The President of the National Pro-Life Alliance, Marin Fox, commented, “I commend Congressman Marino for taking a firm stand on protecting the unborn…I’m proud to count Tom Marino in the ranks of pro-life champions.” [wolnews.com, 6/29/11]

Miscellaneous

Started Veteran’s History Project

In December 2011, Marino started a local version of the Veteran’s History Project, a project started by the American Folklife Center at the Library of Congress.

Marino said, “More and more of our World War II vets are getting older, and now maybe they're more inclined to talk about their experiences to share that knowledge with us. We need to make sure we record and archive and video what these men and women went through.” [Times Tribune, 12/8/11]

Hosted Hearing to Examine Irene and Lee Storm Response

In November 2011, Marino through his Homeland Security Subcommittee hosted a hearing to look at the local response to the aftermaths of Hurricane Irene and Tropical Storm Lee.

Members of the public were allowed to submit questions, an unusual practice for congressional hearings. Marino said, “It's not a finger pointing, criticizing hearing. It's to find out what we did right, what we would change in the future and what we can do to prevent the extensive damage or at least some of the damage that's going to happen in the next flood.” Local officials raised questions relating to river-depth measurement gauges, better advanced warning of flooding, and availability of mobile homes as temporary housing.

Marino said, “I know that we've gotten calls in the D.C. office because there are still thousands of these trailers sitting around the country and people were asking, 'What are you going to do with them? Can we

19

buy them?' I think it'll be a good thing for the district, bring Washington to the district so they get an idea of what we're faced with here.” [Citizen’s Voice, 11/29/11]

Satisfied with $3.4 Billion House Recommendation for LIHEAP Funding

In November 2011, Marino was satisfied with the House recommendation of $3.4 billion for LIHEAP and pointed out that it was $800 million more than Obama requested originally. [Times-Leader, 11/08/11]

Reimbursed Himself $1,367.50 in Travel Expenses

From July-September 2011, Marino was reimbursed $1,367.50 in private auto mileage. [2011 3nd Quarter Statements of Disbursement, 10/5/11]

Received Income From 3 Rental Sites

In 2011, Marino earned income from 3 Florida rental properties, in addition to consulting and attorney fees.

Mari no and his wife owned two homes in St. Cloud, Fla., that provided a combined rental income of $5,202-$16,000 a year. Marino reported earned income at $140,168 for the year, including $17,728 in attorneys fee and $9,125 in consulting fees. The only position he listed on the disclosure form was as state treasurer with Order Sons of Italy in America – Grand Lodge of Pennsylvania, for which he did not receive compensation. [Times Leader, 08/12/11]

Received 55% Score From Heritage Action for America

In August 2011, Heritage Action released a scorecard that encompassed 30 key votes and 5 co-sponsorships. Marino received a 55 percent score from Heritage Action for America in 2011. [Heritage Action for America, accessed 8/29/11]

Announced Federal Funding was Available After Official Disaster Declaration

In July 2011, Marino’s office announced that five counties in his district are eligible to receive federal funding to help recover from the storms in April. Marino’s office was notified by the Federal Emergency Management that President Obama issued a major disaster declaration for Pennsylvania, triggering the release of funds for damage.

Congressman Marino and Congressman Glenn Thompson co-authored a letter of support for Governor Corbett’s request for a federal disaster declaration. [northcentralpa.com, 7/14/11]

Marino: “There is No Room for Ideology”

In a July 2011 op-ed, Marino wrote, “There is no room for ideology. Regardless of our viewpoints, our future – and that of our children and grandchildren – is in jeopardy unless we all put aside our political aspirations and get down to work in Washington.” [Times-Leader, 7/20/11]

On Track to Spend Hundreds of Thousands Less on Staff Salaries than Democratic Predecessor

20

In July 2011, The Pocono Record reported that Marino was on track to spend hundreds of thousands less than his Democratic predecessor.

Marino’s staff salaries for the first quarter of 2011 totaled $184,286. This would result in an annual staff payroll this year of $736,000.

Marino’s Democratic predecessor Chris Carney spent $1,038,080 on staff salaries in 2010. [The Pocono Record, 7/24/11]

Promised to Make Frequent Visits to District

In June 2011, Marino stated that he meant to keep up his campaign promise to make frequent stops in his district. “I absolutely will be all over the district…It is a chance for me to be home and a chance for me to listen to my constituents and visit with my family.” [The Daily Item, 6/27/11]

Asked for Federal Disaster Assistance for PA

In June 2011, Marino wrote a letter to President Obama “supporting Governor Tom Corbett’s request for federal disaster assistance for five counties…The congressman echoed Gov. Corbett’s statement that local communities have ‘depleted resources and exhausted budgets’ as a result of the emergency response to the storms.” [Office of Congressman Marino, 6/27/11]

Went on CODEL to Europe with “Plenty of Time for Fun”

In June 2011, Marino went on a 10-day congressional delegation trip with five other House members to “examine the European financial crisis’ and the ‘foreign operations of the US government,’” though a “minute-by-minute itinerary of the Rome leg obtained by The Huffington Post makes clear there will be plenty of time for fun.”

The weekend in Rome alone was estimated to cost taxpayers $70,000, including “extra security, drivers and overtime for embassy staff, including a cashier and two guards for a delegation courtesy room at the hotel where guests can exchange their dollars for Euros, instead of heading to the nearest ATM.” [The Huffington Post, 6/24/11]

2012 Campaign

Former Rep. Chris Carney Explored Comeback Bid

In December 2011, former Rep. Chris Carney told supporters he planed to explore a comeback bid depending on Pennsylvania’s new congressional map;

Carney met with Pennsylvania political fundraisers, donors, and organized labor representatives to discuss a 2012 campaign. Carney said he would not make a decision about running until a map was released and he said that he would not challenge another Democrat. He could potentially face a re-match against Marino, who he lost to in 2010. [Roll Call, 12/6/11]

21

22