Tokyo Cap and TradeTokyo Cap-and-TradeDriver for a Low Carbon City

Yuki Arata Bureau of Environment Tokyo Metropolitan Government

Tokyo Cap-and-Trade 1.Results 2.Outline 3.Challenges 4.Lessons

1. Remarkable results!2nd Year ReportpGreen Buildings Era in Tokyo

The results of the second year report 1y p

23%In total23%Reduction

from the base-year emissionsCf. Their obligated reduction: 6 % or 8%

93%93% of the covered facilities

reduced more than the obligations

1. Remarkable results!

g

The results of the second year report 2y p

5 500About5,500 reduction measures in 5 years

826,700t-CO2826,700t CO2will be reduced by these measures

1. Remarkable results!

Green Buildings Era in TokyoLow Emission Buildings TOP 30 in Tokyo

Existing Buildings Section

Low Emission Buildings TOP 30 in Tokyo

Existing Buildings SectionRetrofits

Sony CitySony Corporation T k Midt

Roppongi HillsMori Building Co., Ltd.

Sony Corporation Tokyo MidtownMitsui Fudosan Co., Ltd.East Japan Railway CompanyMitsubishi Estate Co., Ltd.1. Remarkable results!

New Building Section - Green Building Design

Low Emission Buildings TOP 30 in TokyoNew Building Section - Green Building Design

Techno-StationObayashi CorporationObayashi Corporation

JP TowerJ P t N t k C Ltd

New Headquarters Construction ProjectShimizu Corporation

Marunouchi Park BuildingMitsubishi Estate Co., Ltd.

Japan Post Network Co., Ltd.East Japan Railway Company

Mitsubishi Estate Co., Ltd.

1. Remarkable results!

Tokyo Cap-and-Trade 1.Results 2.Outline 3.Challenges 4.Lessons

2. Development & Outline ofTokyo’s Cap-and-Trade Program

Tokyo’s GHG Emission Reduction TargetGHG Emission Reduction Target

25% below 2000 levels by 2020

Tokyo Carbon Dioxide Footprinty pTotal CO2 Emissions: 59 million tonnes (FY2010)

Emissions Number of Facilities

Trans-portation 40%

Large CO2 emittingfacilities

Emissions Number of Facilities

1,400 facilities0 2%

Commercial &

IndustrialHouseholds

portation23%

40% facilities

S ll & di

=0.2%

More than

47%Households

28%60%

Small & medium CO2 emitting facilities

700,000 facilities=99.8%

2. Program Development & Outline

Program Developmentg p2002 2005 2010

Reporting program(CO2 Emission Reporting Program)

Mandatory reduction program:( 2 p g g )

*Not mandatory reduction program

Reduction target

reduction program:

TokyoCap and Trade Programg

averaged only 2%Cap-and-Trade Program

Accumulation of data helped to design a tailor-made C&T

2. Program Development & Outline

Accumulation of data helped to design a tailor made C&T

A Compliance Period: 5 yearsCap Setting

Base-year emissions

1st period（2010-2014)

2nd period（2015-2019)

p yp g

emissions )

15% reduction

6% reduction5yr average

5yr average

5yr average

2010 2014 2015 2019

2. Program Development & Outline

Allowance Allocation

Emission Allowance

Base-year emissions

= ×( 100%－ ) ×5 yearsCompliance factorAllowance emissions

( ) yfactor

Compliance factor by category

Ⅰ-1Commercial buildings, District cooling & heating facilities (plants) 8%

Ⅰ 2 Commercial buildings using DHC 6%Ⅰ-2 Commercial buildings using DHC 6%

Ⅱ Factories, etc. 6%

Top Certified facilities as： 1/2 or 3/4 of the

2. Program Development & Outline

plevel Top Level / Near-top level Facility

/ /compliance factor

Tokyo Cap-and-Trade 1.Results 2.Outline 3.Challenges 4.Lessons

3. ChallengesStakeholder EngagementStakeholder Engagement

2013 ICAP Training Course @Beijing

Stakeholder Meetingsg

Associate Participants:pBusiness GroupsCompanies with interestsEnvironmental NGOs

Open to the public

Tokyo Metropolitan Government

Open to the public About 200 audience members every time

3. Challenges

2013 ICAP Training Course @Beijing

Discussion Points at the Meetings 1g

Major Objections 1j j

Fair allowance allocation is impossible!For some facilities, further reductions are impossible, p

TMG: Show reduction potential by data

"Top Level Facility Certification"

3. Challenges

Discussion Points at the Meetings 2g

Major Objections 2j j

Difficulties in Tenant BuildingsControlling emissions from tenants is impossible!g p

TMG: Establish a mechanism for tenant issues

Tenant Obligation and Participation SystemRules for Tenant Shifts

TMG: Establish a mechanism for tenant issues

3. Challenges

Rules for Tenant Shifts

Tokyo Cap-and-Trade 1.Results 2.Outline 3.Challenges 4.Lessons

4. What we learned: Important factorsThree misunderstandings for energy efficiencyThree misunderstandings for energy efficiencyKey factors for success

Need to break misunderstandings b ildi ffi ion building energy efficiency

Typical complaints from building owners

1. We have already done a lot!

Typical complaints from building owners

2. We know our buildings well; there’s nothing else we can do!

3. It’s costly to retrofit. We can not afford it!y

4. Lessons

ft th F k hi id tOvercoming the Power Crisis

after the Fukushima accident60GW

Peak Power Consumption (from 1 July to 31 Aug.)

Demand in 2010

Peak load in 201059.99 GW 50GW

Peak load in 2012

40GW

Demand in 2012 50.78 GW30GW

20GW1 July 8 July 15 July 22 July 29 July 5 Aug. 12 Aug. 9 Aug. 25 Aug. 31Aug.

20GW

4. Lessons

Preparedness for the Power Crisis

1 Already did energy audits1. Already did energy audits

2. Already have action plans

3. Already have communication

4. Lessons

The Importance of Cities’ Role

Th k !Thank you!

TMG W b itTMG Websitewww.kankyo.metro.tokyo.jp/eng

www.facebook.com/Environment.TMG

Contacttokyoets@kankyo.metro.tokyo.jp