To fortify or not to fortify - Scotland’s big question

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/16/2019 To fortify or not to fortify - Scotland’s big question

    1/4

    T fortif o no t fortif

    Can you tell our readers a little about whyfortifying

    our with folic acid needs to be considered in Scotland -

    what does it mean to fortify our with folic acid in your

    view? Where has it been successful/unsuccessful?Fortifying our with folic acid will be a very

    effective way to reduce the number of babies

    who are born with neural tube defects like

    spina bida. The folic acid could be added

    to our during the manufacturing process

    relatively easily, and this would go some way

    to increasing folate levels among the general

    population. Folic acid is tasteless, entirely

    safe within recommended intake levels and is

    already included in many foods like breakfast

    cereals.

    Folic acid is naturally present in grain, andthe manufacturing process removes it along

    with other vitamins and minerals - niacin,

    thiamine, iron and calcium - which are

    currently added back in to our. This is clearly

    labelled on packaging. Folic acid is simply a

    water soluble vitamin like niacin and thiamine

    which are B vitamins – low levels of which can also cause

    signicant symptoms and long term conditions.

    There are 78 countries around the world that already have

    mandatory fortification of flour. The USA has done it for

    the past eight years, with no adverse effects on health.

    According to Spina Bifida Hydrocephalus Scotland, neural

    tube defects have reduced by between 27 percent and 50

    percent in countries where mandatory fortification has been

    introduced.

    What major health benets will mandatory folic acid

    fortication tackle and why is it being considered for

    Scotland?

    The Scientic Advisory Committee for Nutrition estimates

    that around 50 pregnancies are affected by neural tube defects

    every year. This is a particular concern in some of our more

    deprived communities, where rates of unplanned pregnancy

    are higher. Within the UK, folate levels tend to be lower in

    Scotland and Northern Ireland, so we have a particular interestin wanting to take action. It’s important to note that these are

    life-long conditions, causing families signicant distress and

    placing an additional and unnecessary cost burden on our

    NHS.

    Scotland’s big question

    Discussions unfolding from the start of this year have revealed thatScotland is edging ever closer to a decision some 16 years in the

    making, whether or not to fortify our with folic acid.

    As concerns rise over the potential for an increase in

    birth defects, Scotland moves towards mandatory

    fortication, as Westminster continue to delay their

    decision.

    The uncertainty surrounding the issue of fortication has led

    to a reduction of the amount of folic acid added to products bycompanies who voluntarily fortify their foods,

    in order to comply with regulations should

    fortication be implemented. This has led to

    mounting concerns of the level of folic acid intake

    across the UK.

    Folate, from the family of B-Vitamins, occurs

    naturally in foods such as nuts and green

    vegetables. Folic acid is a synthetic form of

    folate, often used for food fortication and in

    dietary supplements; it plays a pivotal role in the

    prevention of birth defects, specically neural

    tube defects (NTD) such as spina bida.Since 1992 advice to women UK wide has

    been to begin to take folic acid supplements

    while trying to get pregnant to reduce the risk

    of NTD, but studies have shown that as little as

    28 percent of women take the correct dosage of

    400 micrograms three months prior to pregnancy,

    following this through until the 12th week of pregnancy.

    As the required amount of dietary folate intake does not

    appear possible through diet alone, women who have unplanned

    pregnancies, as well as the those who have not taken the required

    supplement at the correct time, are at greater risk of NTD. It is

    believed that as many as 50 percent of births in Scotland are

    unplanned, expounding the need for the addition of folic acid into

    diets.

    A study published in December 2015 concluded that the failure to

    implement mandatory fortication at the same time as the US in 1998

    led to an estimated 2000 children being born with NTD, and ignoring

    it further could lead to an additional 150 children born with NTD year

    on year; where the US has seen a decrease of children born with NTD

    of 28 percent.

    Extensive research has been carried out by a plethora of scientic

    bodies including the Scientic Advisory Committee on Nutrition

    (SACN), who were looking into potential adverse effects of folic

    acid. The conclusion of this research culminated in a collective call

    for fortication.In a report to UK health ministers last autumn, ofcials at SACN

    testied that where mandatory fortication has been implemented in

    nearly 80 countries worldwide, none had not reported any adverse

    health conditions as a result of fortication.

    Milling and Grain speaks to

    the Scottish Health Minister

    Maureen Watt aboutScotland’s push to fortify our 

    50  | March 2016 - Milling and Grain

    F

  • 8/16/2019 To fortify or not to fortify - Scotland’s big question

    2/4

    How long has the Government, in both Scotland and

    the UK, been discussing this topic and what were some

    of the considerations evaluated?

    The UK Government has consistently delayed introducing

    legislation on this issue since it was rst raised by the Scientic

    Advisory Committee on Nutrition in 2007. The UK Government

    position was to await the outcome of the population blood folate

    status results. These were published on 20 March 2015. A

    decision was then delayed until parliament returned after the

    general election and we are still waiting.

    As part of their remit, Food Standards Scotland (FSS) is

    currently considering the scientic and regulatory aspects of

    fortication of our with folic acid. Before FSS was created, the

    Food Standards Agency had considered this and provided advice

    to us in 2007 and 2014 in support of fortication with a view to

    reducing the risk of congenital neural tube defects.

    There is always some resistance to the introduction of

    our fortication. How have you addressed the most

    important ones of these? Why has there been a delay in

    reaching a decision on this issue?

    To maximise the impact of mandatory fortication, and inline with recommendations from SACN and Food Standards

    Scotland, we believe that a UK-wide approach would be

    most effective. Indeed, Wales and Northern Ireland have

    expressed their support. Unfortunately, the UK Government

    has consistently deferred their decision and in response to my

    latest letter, they have again refused to commit to mandatory

    fortication. With every delay more babies are put at risk,

    which is why we must act now.

    Food fortication has been a contentious issue for some

    time, why is Scotland choosing to act now? And what

    would your advice be to other governments considering

    the introduction of our and/or rice fortication?

    We have been pursuing a UK-wide approach as our preferred

    option. However, should the UK government decide not to act I,

    along with my counterparts in Wales and Northern Ireland, will

    consider how we might progress this. I believe there is strong

    evidence in favour of mandatory fortication.

    The food and drink federation have said they believe

    most manufacturers would favour a harmonised

    approach across the UK on mandatory folic acid

    fortication, but with the UK seemingly ‘dragging its

    heels’ what do you think about this statement? – Is

    there time to wait for a nationwide decision?

    It’s encouraging to see that the Food and Drink Federation want

    a UK-wide approach – we agree with them. We still believe that

    "her ar 78 countrie aroun thworl tha alread hav mandator fortificatio o flou. Th SA ha

     don i fo th pas eigh year, wit n advers effect o healt" 

    Milling and Grain - March 2016 | 51

    F

  • 8/16/2019 To fortify or not to fortify - Scotland’s big question

    3/4

    this is the best way forward, and it is not too late for the UK

    Government to make this decision.

    With some companies voluntarily fortifying foods, for

    example some breakfast cereals and certain spreads, is

    mandatory fortication really necessary?

    Yes, because not all women eat the foods that are voluntarily

    fortied. It is better to use fortied our in order to increasefolic acid in products which are more widely consumed by

    women of childbearing age. The statistics show us that 14.8

    percent of women of childbearing age in Scotland have red

    blood folate concentration below the WHO threshold. This

    is well above the UK-wide average of 11.3 percent and it’s

    especially low in lower-income groups where the problem

    is made worse by the relatively higher number of unplanned

    pregnancies.

    Bread has been a staple food in these islands for centuries, and

    it still is. That’s why fortication of our is such an effective way

    to increase folate levels across the board.

    What would be the implications of Scotland going

    ahead with mandatory folic acid fortication, how

    would businesses who export to the UK and beyond

    deal with this?

    A full consultation with industry, and a business impact assessment,would of course be a part of any mandatory fortication.

    What would the ideal outcome of these ongoing

    discussions be?

    Our ideal outcome is for the UK Government to agree to take

    this forward so we can have a uniform approach across all four

    nations. This would prevent many families from having to go

    through the heartache of being told their unborn child has spina

    bida.

    52  | March 2016 - Milling and Grain

    F

    The new original Alveographby CHOPIN Technologies

    20, Avenue Marcellin Berthelot

    92396 Villeneuve-la-Garenne - France

    The Alveograph is internationallyrecognized and standardized. It is useddaily by wheat breeding, grain storage,milling and baking industries to measurethe viscoelastic properties of wheat flours.

    The new AlveoLab is more accurate andeasier to run. Key steps of the test are nowfully automated to limit the impact of the

    operator. Morevoer, dough bubbles aremade in a fully temperature and humiditycontrolled chamber.

    With the AlveoLab, new test protocols can be easily designed to meet specificapplications and make the alveographanalysis an even better predictor of flourperformance.

    For more informationflash this code or

    visit

    www.chopin.fr

     

  • 8/16/2019 To fortify or not to fortify - Scotland’s big question

    4/4