Upload
duongtruc
View
217
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
GLOBAL STANDARD INITIATIVES
Dinesh Chand Sharma (Seconded European Standardization Expert in India) Director – Standardization, Policy and Regulation
“DOT SEMINAR ON “M2M COMMUNICATIONS/IOT” ORGANIZED BY NTIPRIT”
AIOTI ALLIANCE FOR INTERNET OF THINGS INNOVATION
2
Content
Project SESEI
M2M/IoT Market and Challenges
ETSI Smart M2M & Smart Appliances
oneM2M partnership project
AIOTI - Alliance for IoT Innovation
3GPP
SESEI| 2013 - 2016 | Slide 3
Project SESEI
Seconded European Standardization Expert in India
— local representative and a connect-between standardizers’ communities in EU/EFTA and India
— EU-India dialogue and cooperation on standards, R&D, Innovation, and policy/regulation around standardization
— March’13 to March’16
Project Owners
— EU Standards Organizations (ETSI, CENELEC and CEN), European Commission and EFTA - European Free Trade Association
— Project is managed by ETSI
Priority Sector for this phase of the project (3 Year)
— Information & Communication Technologies (equipment and services)
— Electrical equipment including Consumer Electronics – Smart Energy
— Automotive - ITS
— Smart City
— Energy Efficiency in ICT, Manufacturing policy, WTO-TBT, IPR, R&D & Innovation
— Any other topic of mutual interest
The next step in internet evolution
Source: Alcatel-Lucent
Pre- internet
Internet of CONTENT
Internet of SERVICES
Internet of PEOPLE
Internet of THINGS
+ IP networks
+ IT platforms & services
+ devices & apps
+ sensors, more devices
& tags, big data
“SOCIAL
MEDIA” “WEB 2.0” “WWW”
“HUMAN
TO
HUMAN”
• Fixed & mobile telephony
• SMS
• Information
• Entertainment
• …
• e-productivity
• e-commerce
• …
• Skype
• YouTube
• …
• Identification, tracking, monitoring, metering, …
• Automation, actuation, payment, …
• …
“MACHINE
TO
MACHINE”
+ ambient context, data
semantics
The Internet gave us the opportunity to connect in ways we could never have dreamed possible.
The Internet of Things will take us beyond connection to become part of a living, moving, global nervous system
Diverse Applications
Source HarborResearch.com
6
IoT standardization landscape
7
Many related vertical and horizontal activities
ETSI TC M2M to SMARTM2M
ETSI TC M2M established 2008 and first set of M2M platform standards to market in 2011
Published – 25 TS & TRs, Drafting Stage – 12 TS & TRs, New Work Items – 3 TS
Smart Grid & Meter, Smart City, M2M Architecture, Smart Automotive, Connected Consumer, e-health, Security etc.
July 2012: ETSI M2M work Release 1, transferred to oneM2M partnership project, formed the basis for developing future releases for the world
M2M activities have now been shared from TC SmartM2M to ETSI Partnership Project (*) oneM2M Release1 and Release2 publications
ETSI M2M is renamed as SMARTM2M
Maintain ETSI M2M published standards and specifications
Identification of EU policy and regulatory requirements on M2M services and applications and the conversion of the oneM2M specifications into European Standards.
Strategic Topic & scope now include Smart City, e-Health and Smart Appliances, Smart BAN – Body Area Network covering health, wellness, leisure, sport
(*) ETSI Partnership Project of the same nature than 3GPP
9
eHealth and SAP
ETSI Project eHEALTH
Glossary: Terms and Definitions in the ETSI Health Domain
TR 102 764 on eHEALTH Architecture
Analysis of user service models, technologies and applications supporting eHealth
SR 002 564
Applicability of existing ETSI and ETSI/3GPP deliverables to eHealth
1st SAP workshop: May 2014
Scope, objectives, timelines, deliverables defined as part of ToR
2nd SAP & 3rd workshop co-hosted by EC DGCONNECT & ETSI
TS 103 265
SAP Common Ontology for Smart Appliances
TS 103 267
SAP M2M communications for Smart Appliances
TS 103 268-1
SAP communication and ontology testing
Smart Appliance Plug & Play” Label
eHealth SAP
Where the SAP project is
SAREF is the Smart Appliance REFerence Ontology. It has been mapped to the oneM2M base ontology (oneM2M TS-0012: "Base Ontology") to be used with oneM2M systems.
TC SmartM2M work on-going is based on TS 103 264 SAP Ontology and oneM2M mapping to be published in November 2015 in V1 and TS 103 264 V2 in Summer 2016 with a oneM2M mapping. SAREF was built via a wide consultation of IoT and Energy related consortia and
alliances, with 4 EC+ETSI SAREF workshops, and publishing the EC study which was regularly presented to oneM2M (WG5) community.
Therefore this work has two major objectives: 1) To provide a standardized framework for the Common Ontology derived from the EC Study Group on Smart Appliances; 2) To map the common ontology onto the elementary oneM2M.
SAREF evolution will be maintained to avoid fragmentation of its definition in different places.
10
© 2015 oneM2M 11
oneM2M PARTNERSHIP PROJECT
11
Over 200+ member organizations in oneM2M
© 2015 oneM2M 12
200+ members organizations Some of the 200+ active members of oneM2M
© 2015 oneM2M 13
Purpose, Work & Deliverables
Purpose To specify and promote a
Standard for an M2M/IoT Common Service Layer
Work Six physical 1-week meetings per year with ~100 attendees 200+ documents produced and discussed at each meeting
3800 docs in 2013 4400 docs in 2014
Deliverables Technical Reports (TRs) and Technical Specifications (TSs)
Release 1 published in January 2015 – 10 TSs Release 2 planned for mid-2016 TRs are not linked to a Release
© 2015 oneM2M 16
Focus on Release 2 Release 2 Requirements are now ‘Frozen’ These requirements can be broadly classified under the following categories:
• Industrial domain enablement • Semantic interoperability • Dynamic authorizations and end to end security • oneM2M as generic interworking framework • Application developer APIs and guidelines • Home domain enablement
Release 2 planned release date is July 2016
© 2015 oneM2M 17
Strong implementation base
Open source implementations
Commercial implementations and demos
First interoperability event was held in Sept 2015
With 30 participating organizations and 75 people
IotDM
© 2015 oneM2M 18
Interoperable standard
Guidelines & Ref. Arch.
Protocols Platforms
MQTT
OMADM LWM2M
HTTP CoAP TLS DTLS
uses
uses
uses interworks with
interworks with
collaborations
© 2015 oneM2M 19
Collaborative Mindset
• Collaborative mindset within oneM2M • Partnership Project from the start • Strong focus on reusing existing technologies wherever possible • Strong consideration for user industries
• Collaborative mindset with external organizations • Personal Connected Health Alliance – Continua • Home Gateway Initiative • AllSeen Alliance • Open Interconnect Consortium • European Smart Metering Industry Group • IEEE P2413 • ITU-T SG20 • W3C
© 2015 oneM2M 20
M2M Common Service Layer in a nutshell
sensors
devices & gateways
connectivity, onboarding, AAA,
management, security, …
application creation
& analytics
“ANY APP”
“ANY NETWORK”
“ANY DEVICE”
Source: Alcatel-Lucent
AIOTI - Alliance for IoT Innovation
Background
February 2015, the IoT industry together with the European Commission launched the Alliance for IoT Innovation (AIOTI) as a new global voice for IoT.
Builds on the work of the IoT European Research Cluster (IERC) and expands activities towards innovation within and across industries.
Biggest IoT stakeholder forum in Europe that identifies roadblocks for IoT deployment, gaps in standardisation and promotes cross-domain synergies by bringing together the telecom, internet sector, automotive, home, agriculture, health and smart city
stakeholders.
AIOTI Status
325+ members by October, 2015.
On AIOTI specific goals
Driver for the IoT Large Scale Pilot projects covering Ageing Well being, Wearables, Farming, Smart City , Autonomous Vehicle in Connected Environment, Smart Manufacturing : H2020/Q1-2016 & Factory of the Future/PPP
Promotion of interoperability between standards.
21
AIOTI ALLIANCE FOR INTERNET OF THINGS INNOVATION
AIOTI ALLIANCE FOR INTERNET OF THINGS INNOVATION
22
AIOTI Structure
Steering Committee WG Chairs, European Commission, Startupbootcamp (SME Representative)
Working Groups (Chair, Alternate Chair): WG 01: IoT European research cluster (SINTEF)
WG 02: Innovation Ecosystems (Philips, Stromatolite)
WG 03: IoT Standardization (ETSI, Schneider Electric)
WG 04: Policy issues (Vodafone, Thales)
WG 05: Smart living environments for ageing well (STMicro)
WG 06: Smart farming and food security (Gradiant, Orange)
WG 07: Wearables (Samsung, iMinds)
WG 08: Smart cities (Telefonica, Engineering)
WG 09: Smart mobility (Bosch, Dunavent)
WG 10: Smart environment/smart water management (Sigfox, TI)
WG 11: Smart manufacturing (Cisco, EFFRA)
© All rights
reserved
Activity status of AIOTI WG3
Deliverables 2015:
Development of a H2020 IoT LSP call accompanying document
Already made available to the EC and officially published in October):
“High Level Architecture (HLA)”
“IoT LSP Standard Framework Concepts”
“Semantic Interoperability”
3 Sub-WGs
SDO & Alliance Landscape including Open Source Initiatives - team lead by
Huawei.
High level IoT Reference architecture - team led by oneM2M Technical Plenary
Chairman / ALU
IoT Semantic Interoperability development team led by Landis+Gyr.
23
AIOTI ALLIANCE FOR INTERNET OF THINGS INNOVATION
© All rights reserved
On 3GPP work for IoT
3GPP is developing a comprehensive program work enabling IoT support
Work had began from 3GPP Release 10, MTC (Machine Type Communication), having requirements: Rel 10 feature - MTC device overload control; Rel11 feature - MTC device triggering; Rel12 feature - recall/replace device triggering, power saving mode.
In Rel. 13, 3GPP defines features such as Service exposure with 3rd party service providers features and Charged party selection. These additional Rel. features are exposed by the 3GPP architecture through its Service Capability Exposure framework.
Also for the present Release 13 (and related continuations to Release 14 when appropriate) work could include e.g.:
More on Lower latency,
More on Peak rate capacity: LAA, Carrier CA, etc
More and on Massive Connections: Narrowband IoT (NB-IoT), LTE-D
24
Standard /Global
ecosystem Band
System Bandwidth
Coverage Module cost
Battery life
Capacity Time to market (years)
SigFox O Unlicensed 250kHz~ ?MHz
UL 100Hz GSM 14dB+ X
Lower than NB-IoT
P
LoRa O Unlicensed 7.8k~500kHz GSM 18dB+ X P
EC-GSM (R13) P GSM band 2.4MHz GSM ~20dB+ 2X
About 1/10 of NB-IoT per unit
BW 1~2
eMTC (R13) P LTE band 1.4MHz LTE 15dB+ 3~10X Similar as NB-IoT 1~2
NB-IOT (standalone) P G/U/L MSR
/dedicated 200kHz GSM 25dB+ X
>50k/cell/200kHz
1~2
NB-IOT (guard-band)
P LTE band 200kHz GSM 20dB+ X 1~2
NB-IOT (in-band) P LTE band 200kHz GSM 17dB+ X 1~2
LPWA Candidate Solutions: Non-standard IoT v.s. Cellular IoT
Applicatio
n family
Applications Battery
Life
Coverag
e
Latency Mobility Technology
Fitness
Can meet cost req.
of <5$?
Type 1
Consumer – wearable's, VIP
tracking (humans or
animals), smart bikes,
medical/assisted living
2~5
Outdoors /
indoors
Estimated at about 30
seconds, 2-5 seconds
might be required in case
of VIP tracking.
Low mobility,
mostly nomadic
NB-IoT > eMTC >
EC-GSM > Cat0
NB-IoT = Yes
eMTC= No
EC-GSM= ?
Cat0=No
Type 2
Industrial asset tracking,
microgeneration; agricultural
& /environmental – near
real-time monitoring
5~10
Outdoors
Under 10 seconds in
most cases.
Nomadic
(assets or live
stock) and
stationary
NB-IoT > eMTC >
EC-GSM
NB-IoT = Yes
eMTC= No
EC-GSM= ?
Type 3 – a Water/gas metering, building
automation, smart city –
parking, waste management;
5~10
Deep
indoor
coverage
10s for control use cases;
60 sec for data collection.
Stationary NB-IoT > eMTC >
EC-GSM
NB-IoT = Yes
eMTC= No
EC-GSM= ?
Type 3 - b Industrial – machinery
control; agricultural /
environmental– stationary
data collection.
5~10
Extended
rural
coverage
Stationary NB-IoT > eMTC >
EC-GSM
NB-IoT = Yes
eMTC= No
EC-GSM= ?
Type 4 City lighting, consumer white
goods, vending machines
<2
Outdoors
and
indoors
<30 seconds for most
use cases except
Vending machine
privacy/data verification
(<1s)
Stationary
NB-IoT > eMTC >
EC-GSM > Cat0
NB-IoT = Yes
eMTC= No
EC-GSM= ?
Cat0=No
Summary The M2M LTE based technologies (NB-IoT, eMTC, Cat0) can support the identified applications but with different costs, different battery life and different coverage requirements.
NB-IoT can meet the target cost for all the application family
eMTC and NB-IoT overlap in meeting the same requirements for LTE in-band but NB-IoT is 50% more cost efficient than eMTC
UL PA efficiency is an important factor in reducing the NB-IoT module cost
Analysis is taking into consideration the EU cost and power consumption requirements
IoT Applications and Technical Requirements
SESEI| 2013 - 2016 | Slide 28
Trust Your Partners, Collaborate & Co-operate!
If you want to go fast, go alone…
If you want to go far, go together
African Proverb
SESEI| 2013 - 2016 | Slide 29
Contact Details:
Dinesh Chand Sharma (Seconded European Standardization Expert in India)
Director – Standardization, Policy and Regulation
European Business Technology Centre, DLTA Complex, South Block, 1st Floor, 1, Africa Avenue, New Delhi 110029
Mobile: +91 9810079461, Tel: +91 11 3352 1500, [email protected]
Thank you!