Titan Perhappi

8/10/2019 Titan Perhappi

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/titan-perhappi 1/12



Preffered User

Prlvate

and Confldsd.l

eee

Muara

Kilis

Coal

Drying lnvestigation

TITAN

by

Thermal Treatment

Presented by:

lr.

Roza

Permana Putra

Oferi

Kresnawahjuesa

Bche, MSc, PhD

fn

TTTAF

Table

of Content

$ lntroduction

/

Background

O

Rotary

drum dryer

by

thermal

treatment

e Coating

treatment

e

Laboratory

data

d

Field

results

-

Prtvele ffid

C,orrlr.tdrila,

Title

goes

here



Preffered

User

dc

TTTIT

4

Blocks

on

Tebo

Exploration

Mining

Concession

2

80

fTTAT

TMI Muara

Kilis

Mine

Location

-

Tebo,

Jambi

Sumatra lsland

lndonesia

Location:

I

Muara

Kilis

Jambi,

Kab Tebo

Sumatra

Title

g.*es

i:lere



Preffered

User

e09

TFTTT

Coal

Reserve Potential

Thickness

ofCoal

Seam

3

-7

meter

Lignite

to

Brown

Coal

Based

on

2

seams

reserves

which

has

the

highest

potential

199,1

Million Ton

748

Million

Ton

36,9

Million

Ton

87,2

Million

Ton

1:2.4

(average)

1:3

(max)

Surface

area of resource

under

investigation:

500 Ha

at

Muara

Kilis Block

e

Report by

PT

LAPI ITB

-

Feb

2008

C Seam Structure:

Total 4 seam

(2

with

highest

potential)

il

Grade;

C Resources:

Total Reserve :

MEASURED:

INDICATED:

INFERRED:

C Stripping

ratio :

Pll\t2r.ana,Con

rd€,,dal

fi

TITAN

PLN

Coal

Contract

for

10,000

MW

program

Titan

has been awarded

a coal

supply

contract

by

pLN

in

Oct

200G

for

20

years

(2009-

2029)

The

contract quantity

is

3.45

million

MT

per

year

for

the

following

locations:

-

CFPP

Suralaya

(Banten)

:0.54

million

MTon

-

CFPP

Labuan

(Banten)

:0.29

million

MTon

-

CFPP

Pelabuhan

Ratu

(West

Java)

:

1.43 million

MTon

-

CFPP

Rembang

(Central

Java)

:0.95

million

MTon

-

CFPP

Parit Baru (West

Kalimantan)

:0.24

million

MTon

Coal

specification:

-

Calorific

Value:

4200

kCal/kg

(ar)

-

Total

Moisture:

30%

(ar)

-

TotalSulfur:

0.33%

(daf)

-

Ash;

S%larl

Title

goes

here





Preffered

User

fr

ITAfr

Titan

Drying

Project

Core

concept

of

Titan

coal

drying

technology:

C

Removing

rnoisture

by

thermal

treatment

{l

Preventing moisture

re-adsorption

by

chemical

coating

to

create

stable

product

after drying

C

Utilize

part

of fine dried

coal

product

as

fuel for

heat

generation

/

combustion

C

Environmentally

friendly

process

e

Economical

and

cost

efficient

-

rt

TTTfr

Plant

Thermal

Efficiency

vs

Moisture

Content

+t (

f

rot

*

,

r6h

G

a

E

fi

3oh

=

E

g

ri$

E'

i*rsg

ileL

,{*t

H :37.71

lY

=

45.15

€$lrlt

cf

tlB,

H:Fr

Lllv

=A7.A,6

,}{.rlr

\--

251A

mt

Ia *

f&*

il0t&

50 *

fihi*llB

f;rilte.*

(tl'r{

br*kl

*Lrtr**

Vin

,

pttrr

{r00

ffs}

.

,0t b/}i[

e't{0 c, r$trt(

tt6c

-ti.ftffi

t

tl00effil

.

r7tbltaa

Cria0C, fttrl

ttOC

{}

o

Lower efficiency

means

higher

CO, emissions

More fuel

needed

per

kWh

Title

goes

here



Rotary

Drum

Dryer

Equipment

e

rTTTfr

sy$tem

T

.*-f"t1

*l

P-Pl

Jlffi

wu{,*

l._.'

.*h

lLd

#ffi *.*b

-\flF"

Technological

Fbw

Chart

of Oeslccatton

ry

';dqtutu*.

(ffiD

lk

{i*

r+*

kr". {rr){Ir)

I

^ ^

ffitr

*ll

i

*.-"ts

ffi,

t

.#ffi'

ffi

Drum

Dryer

Cyclone

Dust

Collector

Exhaust

gas

after treatment

tutvat

a,dc€,,,td0,frat

Equipments:

1. ConveyorSystem

2. Combustion

Chamber

Preffered

User

f

Tm.fr

Sample

Specification

Sample Analysis

for

Laboratory

Testing

Parameterc

Unlt

Sample

Rary

Kllls

Coal Sub Bltumlnous

Bltumlnous

Total Molsture

Proilmate

Analysls

-

lnherent

Moisture

-

Ash

-

Volatlle

Matter

-

Fixed

Carbon

-

Total

sulfur

.GCV

AR

A

Zo -

ADB

[.

ADB

}6.

ADB

Yo -

AOB

/o

- ADB

16

-

ADB

16-AR

49.51

13.10

6.82

46.78

33.30

0.15

5,368

3.119

29.2i

L2.t7

7.M

41.80

38.55

0.28

s,838

4,522

19.

7.fi

7.74

37.73

47.23

0.61

6,571

5.6q2

I

O Sample size

45

-9O

trm

6

itle goes

here



Preffered

User

s%

ITTTN

Combustibility

of

Raw

and Dried

Coal

Combustibility

of

Titan Raw Coal

and

Dried

Coal

RawCoal

Dried

Coal

S$Bilmin(rE

Bi|mimrs

Anlhacils

1

Sub

Bituminous

\ ./ Bitumino

tlt,

l/'\

|

I

{'i I

it i t

,

--

\

l.

/1, Y

//-:=

i

-4i7

/

-"i.-

;/

<s/

0 100 200 s00 400 500 800 700

800

Temperature(qc)

O Thermogravimetry Analysis

IIGA )

for combustibillty test

O Combustion

rate

temperature

range for dried

coal

is

slightly higher

than raw coal

-

t\rvrbir.lCoil.l€4frat

-0.030

-o0?5

.E

-o.o2o

E

; B

-o.ort

d\

*u

;.:,

-o-oro

o

f;

E

-0.005

0.000

0.005

13

f.

ffiffi

Chemical Functional

Group lnvestigation

0.5

0,4

@

F

0.3

€

o

5

0.1

0

4@0

3500 3000

2500

2000

,500

Wave Numberc(cm'1)

FTIR

suggests

no

big

difference in R*between

Raw

and Dried coal

Changes

in chemical structures

like

destruction

of O<ygen

Functional

Group includinp

has

not been observed

Ptiv'barr.rMttu$d

FTIR

of

Raw Coal and

Dried Coal

Aromatk

Group

Band

(160()

cmj)

Title goes

here

'7



Preffered User

ds

f

iTAfr

Oxidizing

Heat lnvestigation

E

e

&

o

o

@

c

E

o

25.O

20.o

15.O

10.o

5.O

o.o

Raw&al

DrhdGl(TM30?6)

SubOltumlnous

Sample Doscription

oddlzlng Heat forTltan Raw Coal

and Drled coal

a

o

Self heating test

with

DSC

-

Differential Scanning Calorimetry

Dried

Coal

showed

comparable risk of self heating compare to Raw Coal

fe

riTTF

Chemica

ls

Coating

Treatment

Coating Agent Application

on

Conveyor Belt

Coatingtreatment

:

1. Coatingagent

o

Surtactant

.

Hydrocarbon

2.

Watersoluble

3.

Application

rate

.

0.5%(w/w)

S.sd.Ir rpafnng

Title

goes

here



Preffered

User

8o

TM

Uptake

at

Heavy Moisture

Environment

Total

Moisture

(%,

AR) uptake

at

Heavy

Moisture

Exposure

Condition

Dried

-

Uncoated

and

Dried

-

Coated

sample

(Lab

Scale)

5.00

24.00

23.00

2.00

^

21.00

{

€

m.oo

E

,".00

18.00

17.00

18.00

t5.00

a

lx9@.. trm.

(k)

a

Raw coal

is dried to

the total

moisture level

of 20%

O

Exposed

to controlled

high moisture

environment (humidity

97

-

98%)

environment

at 32.5oC

.t

rffi

TM

Uptake

at

Stockpile

Environment

Total

Moisture

(%,

AR)

Uptake at

Actual Condition

Dried

-

Uncoated

and Dried

-

Coated

sample

(Stockpile

Condition)

40-

30

38

^34

932

E

E30

T

i.28

a

22

20

rsE

T

c

10

c coal is driedtoTM

level*30%(AR)

O Stockpilesize

1,@O-

L50OMTon

O Relatively

stabie

TM

after

2 months

O Stockpile

TMI

ar

lanrbi

9

ifle

goes

here



Preffered

User

dO

Proximate

Analysis

of

TM

Uptake

Stockpile

TTTTT req*n1*l:,,:,..:

Proximate

Analysis results

of

Uncoated

-

Dried Coal and Coated

*

Dried Coal

O Coal is

dried to TM level

-

30%

(AR)

C

Relatively

stable TM

after 2 months

-

hmSn{

oih

Uncoo$d.onedlod

Cooted.fiid(ool

ru

IL IQI

&i

t

in$

Ash

& tml

IS

p,

tm

w

Gtl/

l.rl&n m

Til

it itr

u,

& [nql

Ash

& tmt

TS

A-NDN

GCV

k.$lo An

GCV

trd&o inn

l5.Jun.0

i2'Juot

l0-Jun4

&$r.{9

l}Jllr{

l0.iul-01

77Jul-0

29.4i

31.1r

31.3,

29.8

29.t

27 6r

2$3

15.63

19.38

14.01

182{

1$.7'1

'lzio

llJ

l.4i

t.7l

t.il

4.3

4.8'

0.?

0.?

03

n,

0.?

0.2

0.1

4281

I {,t5

4.nl

1

471

t158

4.,t91

{

871

511I

5 132

5 33r

5.?r0

5.13?

5.463

5.5 B

29.['

30

2l

29

si

d.a

?7.r

20. :

15.3i

18

8r

13I

1?.{

16.?t

10{r

,1

A,

t.1r

dt

.q.3

9.8r

0.,

8.81

f,t,

0.?

0.1

0.5

0.3

0.3

0.{

{ J]J

{:3S

{.173

4.18

1.332

d,E34

{.402

5,ti8

4.933

438-i

4,Sg{

lfi?

5,3$0

fi

imT

Coal Fuel

Requirement

for

Drying

Coal Fuel

Requirement

to

achieve Target

Total

Moisture

Reduction

IM

-Total

Moistu{e

Content

(%)

CV

-Calorlfic

Value

(kCa/kg)

lnitialTM

*CoalTotal

Moisture

before

Drylng

(%l

o

Thermodynamically correlated

between

fuel

consumpUon and

target flnal

Total Moisture

-

Ptvot rrrdoontld',rdal

Frrd

frprolfu

fTtr hhrl

lnithJ

TH

to;l

PrrduotlonCrprtlU

FinalTll

(Tonrhn

rq6r

Full

Rrqulrumrnt

l?onrhrl

t00

t00

t00

t00

5D

50

50

50

325

66.Si

71.43

76.92

20

25

30

t 2.5

11.11

9.52

r.69

Note:

Title

goes

here

l0



fc

TTTTT

Conclusions

O

Thermal treatment

shows

capability

to

reduce

Kilis

coal

TM

(AR)

from

50%

up to 20%.

o

The

degree

of TM reduction

affects

the fuel consumption

requirement'

o

The drying

process

does

not

significantly alter

the

the

Proximate

Analysis

parameters

such as

Ash Content,

Total

Sulfur and

lnherent Moisture.

O

Addition

of

coating

agent did not

impact

coal

TM

and Proximate

Analysis

parameters

siBnificantly.

o

Dried

coated

sample

shows

relatively

stable characteristic

when

tested

on

stockpile

environment

for 5

-

8

weeks

period

even

after

heavy rainfall

condition.

O

Both

dried

-coated

and uncoated

coals

do not

experlence

self

-

combustion

when

stored

properly

even

on

open shelter

stockpile.

Ptttt taa,,doorilrffi.l

{

fo

mra-fr

Thank

You

A*

Title

goes here

t2

Documents

Titan Perhappi