20
and Priority Schools 101 Tim Boyd, School Improvement Team Oregon Department of Education [email protected]

Tim Boyd, School Improvement Team Oregon Department of Education [email protected]

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Tim Boyd, School Improvement Team Oregon Department of Education tim.boyd@state.or.us

Focus and Priority Schools 101

Tim Boyd, School Improvement TeamOregon Department of Education

[email protected]

Page 2: Tim Boyd, School Improvement Team Oregon Department of Education tim.boyd@state.or.us

New to Focus and Priority

Page 3: Tim Boyd, School Improvement Team Oregon Department of Education tim.boyd@state.or.us

Today’s Objectives

» Focus and Priority Schools identification & the first three years

» Stats on current Focus and Priority Schools

» Expectations of Focus and Priority Schools

» Turnaround Leadership and what is required to turnaround a school’s performance

Page 4: Tim Boyd, School Improvement Team Oregon Department of Education tim.boyd@state.or.us

How were schools Identified?

» Using State school report card in 2012

» OAKS growth and achievement data

» Norm Referenced system

Page 5: Tim Boyd, School Improvement Team Oregon Department of Education tim.boyd@state.or.us

Ratings

» Level 1 Rating – Bottom 5% - Priority Schools

» Level 2 Rating – Bottom 6%-15% - Focus Schools

» Ratings based on achievement, growth, sub-group growth and graduation rate & sub-group graduation rate (HS)

Page 6: Tim Boyd, School Improvement Team Oregon Department of Education tim.boyd@state.or.us

First Two Years

» School Appraisals and reports» Self-Assessments & Indistar and initial CAP» Year One – planning » Year Two – implementation» Year Three – implementation and refinement» Year Four - … here we go!

Year One

Year Two

Year Three

Year Four

Page 7: Tim Boyd, School Improvement Team Oregon Department of Education tim.boyd@state.or.us

Stats on Focus and Priority Schools

» 91 Focus and Priority Schools» As of August, 2014, Over half have improved to

a Level 3 rating or better (60% of rated schools)» 68 Elementary, 1 Middle School, 1 High School,

1 Charter school, 2 Alt. Ed schools and 18 SIG schools

Page 8: Tim Boyd, School Improvement Team Oregon Department of Education tim.boyd@state.or.us

Stats

After Year Two52 schools are at a Level 3 or better (includes the not rated schools)

53 have upward trends in growth and/or achievement from last year

78 have increases in achievement and/or growth since identification

Page 9: Tim Boyd, School Improvement Team Oregon Department of Education tim.boyd@state.or.us

Expectations of F/P Schools

»Level 3 rating or better by 2016 to exit Improvement Status

Page 10: Tim Boyd, School Improvement Team Oregon Department of Education tim.boyd@state.or.us

Expectations of F/P Schools

» Submit and update a CAP and Budget 3 times a year

» Work with a coach 8-10 hours a week» Submit formative data for reading and math» Authentically engage in school turnaround

Page 11: Tim Boyd, School Improvement Team Oregon Department of Education tim.boyd@state.or.us

Expectations of F/P Schools

» CAP – living document, place where you can update progress and alter course, next steps and plan, road map – few, clear priorities

» Budget – plan for expenses and fund your plan» Turnaround – turnaround vs. improvement» Work with Leadership coach and ODE point

person

Page 12: Tim Boyd, School Improvement Team Oregon Department of Education tim.boyd@state.or.us

»Look at your school data and ask yourself –

Does this data drive the plan?

Will this plan get us there?

Page 13: Tim Boyd, School Improvement Team Oregon Department of Education tim.boyd@state.or.us

School Turnaround

Page 14: Tim Boyd, School Improvement Team Oregon Department of Education tim.boyd@state.or.us

How do we define turnaround?

14

Documented

Quick

Dramatic

Sustained

Change in the Performance of an Organization

Page 15: Tim Boyd, School Improvement Team Oregon Department of Education tim.boyd@state.or.us

Specific Leader Actions Lead To Dramatic Change

Turnaround Leader Actions

15

Page 16: Tim Boyd, School Improvement Team Oregon Department of Education tim.boyd@state.or.us

16

Focus on a few early wins

Get the right staff, right the remainder

Break organization norms

Lead a turnaround campaign

Push rapid-fire experimentation

Drive decisions with open-air data

Turnaround Leader Actions

Page 17: Tim Boyd, School Improvement Team Oregon Department of Education tim.boyd@state.or.us

Turnaround Leader Actions

» Does Everyone know what students need to know and be able to do?

» Does Everyone know how you will know when they have learned it?

» Does Everyone know what will happen when they do and don’t learn it?

Page 18: Tim Boyd, School Improvement Team Oregon Department of Education tim.boyd@state.or.us

Places to Start

» Systems? Assessment, behavior, intervention..» Master schedule – SPED, ELL, intervention

drives the schedule» Does everyone know the lens through which

you make decisions?» Do you make adult problems kid problems?

Page 19: Tim Boyd, School Improvement Team Oregon Department of Education tim.boyd@state.or.us

Today’s Objectives

» Focus and Priority Schools identification & the First Two Years

» Stats on current Focus and Priority Schools

» Expectations of Focus and Priority Schools

» Turnaround Leadership and what is required to turnaround a school’s performance

Page 20: Tim Boyd, School Improvement Team Oregon Department of Education tim.boyd@state.or.us

Questions ?

Lisa Harlan, Director of School Improvement [email protected]