1
Pilot Study of Supplementary Motor Area rTMS for Tourette’s Syndrome in Children Cynthia Kahl 1 , Adam Kirton 2,3 , Tamara Pringsheim 2,3,4 , Paul Croarkin 5 , Ephrem Zewdie 2 , Quinn McLellan 1 , Rose Swansburg 2,4 , and Frank P. MacMaster 2,4 1 Department of Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada. 2 Department of Pediatrics, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada. 3 Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada. Background Tourette’s syndrome (TS) is a neuropsychiatricdisorder,characterized by brief,repetitive movements and vocalizations called tic s. Current treatment options (antipsychotics, behavioral therapy)are limited, both in sc ope and effic ac y. There is a need for new safe interventions to help youth who are suffering. A maturational reduction in tic frequency fromconscious tic suppression is assoc iated with an inc rease in tonic inhibition in the supplementary motor area (SMA). Repetitive transcranialmagnetic stimulation (rTMS) involves a safe, non invasive applic ation of a magnetic field to a target brain area in order to change its activity and function. Aim 1: To characterize the effect oflow frequency rTMS of the SMA on TS symptoms. Hypothesis 1: Tourette’s syndrome symptomseverity will decrease with low frequency rTMS targeting theSMAbilaterally in children with TS. Aim 2: To identify TMSmediated alterations in brain metabolites and functional connectivity that serveto normalize cortical activity. Hypothesis 2: Improvementin TS symptoms will be moderated by (1)TMS induced changes in GABAand glutamate in the SMAand (2)potentiation of GABAergic neurotransmission. Preliminary Results Discussion Clinic al Measures The preliminary results indicate a substantial improvement in tic severity for thefirst three participants of this pilot studyfollowingtreatment. Quality of lifefactors,such as anxiety and depression, also improved after the rTMS treatment. Magnetic Resonanc e Spec troscopy Measures The observed decrease in glutamate and increase in GABA concentrations coincide with thebrain metabolite changes observed in Tourette’s patients that show areduction in tic severity and frequency from years of conscious tic suppression. TMS Neurophysiology Test Measures Neurophysiology testing can be used to measure intra and intercortical changes in children with Tourette’s syndrome. The changes seen in intracortical inhibition and facilitation are in line with the clinical and MRS measures that were observed. TMS Motor Mapping Measures Motor mapping from Subject 3 shows themap becoming more defined after rTMS treatment. The preliminary data shows an overall improvement in Tourette’s syndrome symptoms, and implies an improvement in cortical activity, and cortical connectivity. More participants are being recruited to determine significance, validity, and reliability of thevarious measures of treatment response. [email protected] [email protected] Methods Clinical measures show improvement in tic severityafter rTMS treatment. Spec trosc opy analysis shows a dec rease in glutamateand an inc rease in GABA in the SMA after rTMS treatment. Neurophysiology measures show changes after rTMStreatment. Transcranial magnetic stimulation was well tolerated with no adverseeffects. Conclusion 27.3 25 1.6 3.1 16.9 38.5 50 1.5 4.8 2.2 79.2 66.7 2.2 9.7 0.9 115.3 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 Tic Severity (YGTSS) Tic Impairment (YG TSS) MASC2 Parent MASC2 Self SMA G lutamate SMA G ABA Change f rom Pre to Post (%) Measure Pre and PostTreatment Measure Changes Subject 1 Subject 2 Subject 3 PreTreatment Motor Map PostTreatment Motor Map 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Ho tsp o t magn itu d e C OG d i sp ari ty Area Volume C h an ge fro m P re to P o st (%) M o to r M ap M e asu re Motor Map Quantification Baseline Measures PostTreatment Measures rTMS Treatment Sample: First three righthanded male participants (age712) with moderate to severe tics were recruited throughthe CalgaryTourette’s Syndrome Clinic. Clinical Measurements Magnetic Resonance Imaging Neurophysiology Tests • Yal e Gl o b al Ti c Severi ty Scal e (YGTSS) • M u l ti d i men si o n al An xi ety Scal e fo r C h i l d ren (M A SC 2) • Gen eral B eh avio r I n ven to ry (P GB I ) • C h i l d ren ’s Dep ressi o n R ati n g Scal eR evi sed (CDRSR) • Hi gh reso l u ti o n an ato mi cal M RI scan • Fi n gertap p i n g task fu n ctio n al M R I scan • M agn etic reso n an ce sp ectro sco p y (M RS) scan s C o rti cal Exci tab i l i ty • Stimu lu s Resp on se Cu rve (SRC) TMS at1 00 1 50% RMT In traco rti cal In h i b i ti o n /Faci l i tati o n • Sh o rt I n terval I ntracortical I nhi bi tion (SI CI ) p air ed pul se TM S,ISI= 2 ms TMS at8 0% and1 20% RMT • In traco rti cal Faci l i tati on (IC F) p air ed pul se TM S,ISI= 1 0 ms TMS at8 0% and1 20% RMT • Lo n g In terval In traco rti cal Inhibiti on (LICI) p air ed pul se TM S,ISI= 1 00 ms TM S at1 20 %an d 120 %RMT • C o n tralateral Silen tP erio d (CSP ) TMS at1 20 %RMT In te rh e mi sp h e ri c In te racti o n • Ip si l ateral Si l en t Peri od (ISP) TMS at1 20 %RMT TMS Motor Mapping Intensity: 100% res ting motor thres hold (RMT) Frequency: 1 Hertz Number ofstimulations: 180 0 total ( 900/side) ( Same as Baseline Measures) Targe ts: Bilateral SMA 4 0 4 8 12 16 20 Left Right Change (%) Figure 1. Tic Severity scores and Tic Impairment scores decreased for all three participants (YGTSS). Anxiety scores decreased for all three participants (MASC2 Parent and Self). G lutamate concentrations in the s upplementary motor area (SMA) decreas ed for all three participants (MRS). G ABA concentrations , only meas ured for Subject 3, s howed a concentration increas e (MRS) after rTMS treatment. Cortic al Silent Period In te rsti mu l u s In te rval (ISI) =2 ms ISI = 10 ms Si l e n t P e ri o d 3 w eeks 30 20 10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 MEP (% of TestMEP) IntracorticalFacilitation PRE P OST Right Left 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 MEP (% of TestMEP) Intrac ortic al Inhibition PRE P OST Right Left Hemisphere Hemisphere He misphere Preliminary Results Right FDI muscle Figure 2 : Motor Map data; Subje ct3. A) Axilum TMS robot (Alberta Children’s Hos pital). B) 10x10 grid placed on a MRIrecons tructed 3D brain, us ed for TMS s timulation targets . C) Right FDI mus cle motor maps recorded before and after 3 weeks of rTMS treatment. Red X indicates highes t motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude (hots pot magnitude) location, blue X indicates the center of gravity (COG ) location. D) Change in motor map quantification showed a decrease in all measures. Area = the area of the map above 50µV MEP . Volume = product of Area and MEP amplitude. A B D C Figure 3 : Ne urophysiology data; Subje ct3. A) Intracortical inhibition increas ed after treatment; more in the right hemis phere. B) Intracortical facilitation change varied between hemispheres. C) Silent period elongated in the left hemisphere. Speculatively, this shows an increase in intracortical inhibition and decrease in facilitation. A B C Right FDI muscle Robotdriven,personalized,neuronavigated repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation interventions appear feasible and welltolerated in children with moderate to severe Tourette’s syndrome. Transcranial magnetic stimulation appears to be a safe formof neuromodulation technology for children with Tourette’s syndrome. Treatment combined with transcranial magneticstimulation and neuroimaging may informmechanisms of ac tion and predic tors of response. Left Hemisphere SRC Right Hemisphere SRC Figure 4 : Stimulus re sponse curve s; Subject3 . The stimulus res pons e curve s hifted after rTMS treatment, different in both hemis pheres . Daily Weekdays 4 Department of Psychiatry, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada. 5 Departments of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

TICS Poster CK … · Pilot&Study&of&Supplementary&MotorArea&rTMS&forTourette’s&Syndrome&in&Children Cynthia(Kahl1,Adam(Kirton2,3,Tamara(Pringsheim2,3,4,Paul(Croarkin5,EphremZewdie2

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: TICS Poster CK … · Pilot&Study&of&Supplementary&MotorArea&rTMS&forTourette’s&Syndrome&in&Children Cynthia(Kahl1,Adam(Kirton2,3,Tamara(Pringsheim2,3,4,Paul(Croarkin5,EphremZewdie2

Pilot  Study  of  Supplementary  Motor  Area  rTMS  for  Tourette’s  Syndrome  in  ChildrenCynthi a  Kahl1,  Adam  Ki rton2,3,  Tamara  Pri ngsheim2,3,4,  Paul  C r oarkin5,  Ephrem Zewdie2,  Qui nn  McLell an1,  Rose  Swansburg2,4,  and    F r ank  P.  MacMaster2,41Depar t ment  o f  Neur os c ienc es,  Univer s it y  o f  Calgar y,  Calgar y,  AB ,  Canada.2Depar t ment  o f  P ediat r ics ,  Univ ers i ty  o f  Calgar y,  Calgary ,  AB ,  Canada.3Depar t ment  o f  Cl in ic a l  Neur os c iences ,  Univ ers i ty  o f  Calgar y,  Calgary ,  AB ,  Canada.

Background• Tourette’s  syndrome  (TS)  is  a  neuropsychiatric  disorder,  characterized  by  

brief,  repetitive  movements  and  vocalizations  called  tics.• Current  treatment  options  (antipsychotics,  behavioral  therapy)  are  limited,  

both  in  scope  and  efficacy.• There  is  a  need  for  new  safe  interventions  to  help  youth  who  are  suffering.

• A  maturational  reduction  in  tic  frequency  from  conscious  tic  suppression  is  associated  with  an  increase  in  tonic  inhibition  in  the  supplementary  motor  area  (SMA).

• Repetitive  transcranial  magnetic  stimulation  (rTMS)  involves  a  safe,  non-­‐invasive  application  of  a  magnetic  field  to  a  target  brain  area  in  order  to  change  its  activity  and  function.  

Aim  1:  To  characterize  the  effect  of  low  frequency  rTMS  of  the  SMA  on  TS  symptoms.Hypothesis  1: Tourette’s  syndrome  symptom  severity  will  decrease  with  low  frequency  rTMS  targeting  the  SMA  bilaterally  in  children  with  TS.Aim  2:  To  identify  TMS-­‐mediated  alterations  in  brain  metabolites  and  functional  connectivity  that  serve  to  normalize  cortical  activity.Hypothesis  2:  Improvement  in  TS  symptoms  will  be  moderated  by  (1)  TMS-­‐induced  changes  in  GABA  and  glutamate  in  the  SMA  and  (2)  potentiation  of  GABAergic  neurotransmission.

Preliminary  Results

DiscussionClinical  Measures• The   preliminary   results   indicate   a   substantial   improvement   in  tic   severity   for  

the  f irst  three   participants   of  this  pilot  study  following  treatment.• Quality   of  life  factors,  such   as  anxiety   and   depression,   also   improved   after  the  

rTMS   treatment.

Magnetic  Resonance  Spectroscopy  Measures• The   observed   decrease   in  glutamate   and  increase   in  GABA   concentrations  

coincide   with  the  brain   metabolite   changes   observed   in  Tourette’s  patients  that  show  a  reduction   in  tic  severity   and  frequency   from  years   of  conscious  tic  suppression.

TMS  Neurophysiology  Test  Measures• Neurophysiology   testing   can  be   used   to  measure   intra-­‐ and   intercortical  

changes   in  children   with  Tourette’s  syndrome.• The   changes   seen   in  intracortical   inhibition  and  facilitation   are   in   line   with  the  

clinical   and  MRS  measures   that  were   observed.

TMS  Motor  Mapping  Measures• Motor  mapping   from  Subject   3  shows  the  map   becoming   more   def ined   after  

rTMS   treatment.

Ø The   preliminary   data   shows  an  overall   improvement   in  Tourette’s  syndrome  symptoms,   and  implies   an  improvement   in  cortical   activity,   and  cortical  connectivity.

Ø More   participants   are   being   recruited   to  determine   signif icance,   validity,   and  reliability   of  the  various   measures   of  treatment   response.

c yn th i a.kahl@u calgary.cab rai n ki ds@uc algary. ca

Methods

• Clinical  measures  show  improvement  in  tic  severity  after  rTMS  treatment.• Spectroscopy  analysis  shows  a  decrease  in  glutamate  and  an  increase  in  GABA  in  the  SMA  after  rTMS  treatment.• Neurophysiology  measures  show  changes  after  rTMS  treatment.• Transcranial  magnetic  stimulation  was  well  tolerated  with  no  adverse  effects.

Conclusion

-­‐27 .3 -­‐2 5

-­‐1 .6 -­‐3 .1-­‐1 6 .9

-­‐3 8 .5-­‐5 0

-­‐1 .5 -­‐4 .8 -­‐2 .2

-­‐7 9 .2-­‐6 6 .7

-­‐2 .2-­‐9 .7

-­‐0 .9

1 1 5 .3

-­‐9 0-­‐8 0-­‐7 0-­‐6 0-­‐5 0-­‐4 0-­‐3 0-­‐2 0-­‐1 00

1 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 0

1 0 01 1 01 2 0

Tic  Severity  (YGTSS) Tic  Impairment  (YGTSS) MASC2  Parent MASC2  Self SMA  Glutamate SMA  GABA

Change  from

 Pre  to  Post  (%)

Measure

Pre  and  Post-­‐Treatment  Measure  Changes

Subject  1

Subject  2

Subject  3

Pre-­‐Treatment  Motor  Map

Post-­‐Treatment  Motor  Map

-­‐90

-­‐ 80

-­‐ 70

-­‐ 60

-­‐ 50

-­‐ 40

-­‐ 30

-­‐ 20

-­‐ 10

0

Ho tspo t  magn itude COG  d isparity Are a Vo lume

Change  from  Pre  to  Post  (%)

Mo to r  Map  Me asu re

Motor  Map   Quantification

Baseline  Measures

Post-­‐Treatment  Measures

rTMS  Treatment

Sample:  First  three  right-­‐handed  male  participants  (age  7-­‐12)    with  moderate  to  severe  tics  were  recruited  through  the  Calgary  Tourette’s  Syndrome  Clinic.

Clinical  Measurements

Magnetic  Resonance  Imaging

Neurophysiology  Tests

•  Yale   Global  Tic  Severi ty   Scale   (YGTSS)•  Mu ltid imen sional  An xiety   Scale   fo r  Ch i ld ren   (MASC2)•  General   Behavio r   In ven to ry   (P -­‐GB I)•  Ch i ld ren ’s  Dep ression  Ratin g   Scale-­‐Revised   (CDRS-­‐R )

•  High   reso lu tion  anatomical   MR I   scan•  Fin ger-­‐tapp in g   task   fun ctional  MR I   scan•  Magnetic   resonan ce   spectro scopy   (MRS)   scan s

Cortical  Excitab il ity•  Stimu lu s  Respon se  Cu rve   (SRC )

à TMS  at  1 00 -­‐1 50%  RMT

In traco rtical   Inh ib ition/Facil itation•  Sho rt   In terval   Intracortical   Inhibi tion   (SICI)

à paired  pu lse  TMS,  ISI  =  2  msà TMS  at  8 0%  and  1 20%  RMT

•   In traco rtical  Faci l i tation   (IC F)à paired  pu lse  TMS,  ISI  =  1 0  msà TMS  at  8 0%  and  1 20%  RMT

•  Long   In terval   In traco rtical  Inhibition  (LICI)à paired  pu lse  TMS,  ISI  =  1 00  msà TMS  at  1 20%  and  120%  RMT

•  Con tralateral  Si len t  P eriod   (CSP )à TMS  at  1 20%  RMT

In te rhemisphe ric   In te raction•   Ip si lateral  Si len t  Period  (ISP)

à TMS  at  1 20%  RMT

TMS  Motor  Mapping

Intensity:  100%  resting  motor  threshold  (RMT)

Frequency:  1  Hertz

Number  of  stimulations:  1800  total  (900/side)  

(Same  as  Baseline  Measures)

Targets:  Bilateral  SMA

-­‐ 4

0

4

8

12

16

20

Left Right

Change  (%

)

Figure  1.  Tic  Severity  scores  and  Tic  Impairment  scores  decreased  for  all  three  participants  (YGTSS).  Anxiety  scores  decreased  for  all  three  participants  (MASC2  Parent   and  Self).  G lutamate  concentrations  in  the  supplementary   motor   area  (SMA)   decreased  for  all  three  participants  (MRS).   GABA  concentrations ,  only  measured  for   Subject  3,  showed  a  concentration  increase  (MRS)  after  rTMS   treatment.

Cortical  Silent  Period

Inte rstimu lus   In te rval   (ISI)   =  2  ms ISI  =   1 0  ms Sile n t  Pe riod

3  weeks

-­‐ 30

-­‐ 20

-­‐ 10

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

MEP  (%

 of  Test  M

EP)

IntracorticalFacilitation

PREPOST

RightLeft-­‐ 70

-­‐ 60

-­‐ 50

-­‐ 40

-­‐ 30

-­‐ 20

-­‐ 10

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

MEP  (%

 of  Test  M

EP)

IntracorticalInhibition

PREPOST

RightLeftHemisphere Hemisphere Hemisphere

Preliminary  Results

Right   FD I  muscle

Figure  2:  Motor  Map  data;  Subject  3.  A)  Axilum TMS  robot  (Alberta  Children’s  Hospital). B) 10x10  grid  placed  on  a  MRI-­‐reconstructed   3D   brain,  used  for  TMS  s timulation   targets . C)  Right  FDI  muscle  motor  maps  recorded    before  and  after   3  weeks  of  rTMS  treatment.   Red  X indicates  highest  motor  evoked  potential  (MEP)   amplitude   (hotspot   magnitude)  location,  blue  X indicates  the  center  of  gravity  (COG)  location.  D) Change  in  motor  map  quantification   showed  a  decrease  in  all  measures .  Area  =  the  area  of  the   map  above  50µV  MEP.   Volume  =  product   of  Area   and  MEP  amplitude.

A B

D

C

Figure  3:  Neurophysiology  data;  Subject  3.  A)  Intracortical  inhibition  increased  after  treatment; more  in  the  right   hemisphere. B)  Intracortical   facilitation  change  varied  between  hemispheres .  C)  Silent  period   elongated  in  the  left   hemisphere.  Speculatively,  this  shows  an  increase  in  intracortical  inhibition  and  decrease  in  facilitation.

A B C

Right   FD I  muscle

• Robot-­‐driven,  personalized,  neuro-­‐navigated  repetitive  transcranial  magnetic  stimulation  interventions  appear  feasible  and  well-­‐tolerated  in  children  with  moderate  to  severe  Tourette’s  syndrome.

• Transcranial  magnetic  stimulation  appears  to  be  a  safe  form  of  neuromodulation  technology  for  children  with  Tourette’s  syndrome.

• Treatment  combined  with  transcranial  magnetic  stimulation  and  neuroimaging  may  inform  mechanisms  of  action  and  predictors  of  response.

Left  Hemisphere  SRC Right   Hemisphere  SRC

Figure  4:  Stimulus  response  curves;  Subject  3.  The  stimulus  response  curve  shifted  after  rTMS  treatment,   different   in  both   hemispheres .  

Daily

Weekdays

4Depar t ment  o f  P s y c hiatr y,  Univ ers i ty  o f  Calgar y,  Calgary,  AB ,  Canada.5Depar t ment s  of  P s y chiat ry  and  P s yc hology,  May o  Cl in ic,  Roc hester ,  MN,  USA .