Upload
others
View
4
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Operations Research Center of ExcellenceResearching the Army’s Future
Developing Tomorrow’s Leaders
U S M A
Using Commercial Simulation Software toUsing Commercial Simulation Software toModel Linear and NonModel Linear and Non--Liner Processes: USLiner Processes: US
Military Academy ReceptionMilitary Academy Reception--DayDaySimulation and OptimizationSimulation and Optimization
Thursday, 27 October 2005Thursday, 27 October 2005
LTC Simon R. Goerger, PhD2LT Stephen P. Fuller2LT Jeffrey D. Glick2LT Thomas P. KavanaughMr. Arlan C. Sheets
8th Annual8th AnnualSystems EngineeringSystems Engineering
ConferenceConference
2Researching the Army’s Future
Developing Tomorrow’s Leaders
AgendaAgenda
� Systems Engineering Management Process� Reception-Day Background� Problem Statement� Assumptions� Overview of R-Day simulation in ProModel� Initial analysis� Alternatives� SimRunner Optimization� Study Conclusions� Summary
Environment
ProblemDefinition
NeedsAnalysis
Value SystemDesign
ImplementationPlanning for
Action
Assessment &Control
Execution
EngineeringDesign Problem
Design &Analysis
AlternativesGeneration
Modeling &Analysis
DecisionMaking
AlternativeScoring
Decision
Cultural
Political
Historical
Moral /Ethical
Economic
Technological
<---- Assessment & Feedback --------
DescriptiveScenario
Current Status:What is?
NormativeScenario
Desired End State:What should be?
Systems Engineering andSystems Engineering andManagement ProcessManagement Process
4Researching the Army’s Future
Developing Tomorrow’s Leaders
ReceptionReception--Day BackgroundDay Background
� Process conducted annually in some form for over200 years
� All tasks must be completed in one day between0630 and 1730
� Over 1200 cadets in-processed annual for over 20years
� Critical Reception-Day (R-Day) tasks� Thayer Hall (Linear)� United States Corps of Cadets (USCC) (Non-Linear)
5Researching the Army’s Future
Developing Tomorrow’s Leaders
Problem StatementProblem Statement
� Stream line Reception-Day activities for in-processing new cadets into the Corps ofCadets from the initial arrival of candidatesat Thayer Hall until the start of the OathCeremony to ensure all critical tasks andtraining are completed prior to the OathCeremony at 1745.
6Researching the Army’s Future
Developing Tomorrow’s Leaders
Information ResourcesInformation Resources� Information Resources:
� Admissions� “Beast” Company Commanders� Directorate of Logistics� Medical Department Activity� R-Day Director� Thayer Hall Non-Commissioned Officers� Treasurer
� Literature:� Operations Order (OPORDs) R-Day 2004� Data sets/maps from R-Day 2004
� Data analysis implemented into model to greatest extent possible� Thayer Hall models form Academic Year 2004
8Researching the Army’s Future
Developing Tomorrow’s Leaders
AssumptionsAssumptions
� Assumptions due to:� Modeling constraints� The need to account for imperfect data
� Examples:� Candidates return to Company Holding Area after each station� Candidates stay together as a single squad throughout the USCC
portion of R-Day� All Candidates have trousers in hand when they leave Issue Point
#2 (IP2)� Drill 1 and Drill 2 are combined� Every Candidate goes to the Barber Shop� IP3 and Company In-Processing grouped together
9Researching the Army’s Future
Developing Tomorrow’s Leaders
Process Flow: Thayer HallProcess Flow: Thayer Hall
BaggageCheck
Admissions
Smart Card
DENTAC
TattooCheck
ChangingArea
Issue Point 1
Treasurer
Immunization
CompanyAssignment
Oath
MedicalCheck
CompanyHolding
AreaUSCCUSCC
STARTSTART
10Researching the Army’s Future
Developing Tomorrow’s Leaders
Functional Flow: Thayer HallFunctional Flow: Thayer Hall
11Researching the Army’s Future
Developing Tomorrow’s Leaders
ProModelProModel: Thayer Hall: Thayer Hall
Model Built By:CDT Stephen P. FullerCDT Jeffrey D. GlickCDT Thomas P. KavanaughCDT Arlan C. Sheets
Faculty Advisor:LTC Simon R. Goerger, PhD
12Researching the Army’s Future
Developing Tomorrow’s Leaders
Process Flow: USCCProcess Flow: USCC
Formationat 1745
ENDEND
Thayer HallThayer HallCompanyReception
Issue Point 2Issue Point 3
Trouser Issue
CompanyIn-Processing
Drill 2
Drill 1
Lunch
Barber
13Researching the Army’s Future
Developing Tomorrow’s Leaders
Functional Flow: USCCFunctional Flow: USCC
14Researching the Army’s Future
Developing Tomorrow’s Leaders
ProModelProModel: USCC: USCC-- Decision PointDecision Point
IP4IP4
BarberBarberShopShop
15Researching the Army’s Future
Developing Tomorrow’s Leaders
Alternatives/IssuesAlternatives/Issues
� Arrival rates of busses to Thayer Hall� Pick-up rates of the candidates from Thayer Hall� Routing of candidates in order to reduce average
wait times at the barbershop and delaying trouserissue
� Number of Squad Leaders available� Number of barbers available
16Researching the Army’s Future
Developing Tomorrow’s Leaders
AlternativesAlternatives� Arrival rates of busses to Thayer Hall� Bottom Line: Buses should arrive to Thayer Hall approximately every
8:30 Arrival Times to Thayer
7.5
8
8.5
9
9.5
10
10.5
8:48 9:15 9:18 8:38 8:58 9:57
5 6 7 8 9 10Interarrival Time (minutes)
Hou
rs fo
r al
l can
dida
tes t
o fin
ish
R-D
ay
Inter-Arrival Time
Time to Complete R-Day
17Researching the Army’s Future
Developing Tomorrow’s Leaders
AlternativesAlternatives� Pick-up rates of the candidates from Thayer Hall� Bottom Line: Longer inter-arrival time = larger squads = shorter R-day
Squad Leader Pickup from Thayer
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
6 7 8 9 10 12 14Interarrival Time of Squad Leaders (minutes)
Ave
rage
Squ
ad S
ize
/ Hou
rs to
Com
plet
e R
-Day
Time to Finish R-DayAVG Squad Size
18Researching the Army’s Future
Developing Tomorrow’s Leaders
AlternativesAlternatives
� Routing of candidates in order to reduce averagewait times at the barbershop and delaying trouserissue
� Bottom Line: Limit the flow of cadets into the barbershop when trouser issue still incomplete
8:58Trousers First9:02Haircut First
Time to CompleteR-DayRule
19Researching the Army’s Future
Developing Tomorrow’s Leaders
AlternativesAlternatives
Squad Leaders Available
8.4
8.6
8.8
9
9.2
9.4
9.6
9.8
10
12 13 14 15 16
# Squad Leaders Available
Tot
al T
ime
to C
ompl
ete
R-D
ay (h
ours
)
Time to CompleteR-Day
� Number of Squad Leaders available� Bottom Line: Recommend 14 squad leaders; too many squad leaders
creates too many (and smaller) squads moving in system
20Researching the Army’s Future
Developing Tomorrow’s Leaders
AlternativesAlternatives� Vary the number of carbers available� Bottom Line: 16 Barbers cost effective
Barbers Available
8.28.48.68.8
99.29.49.69.810
10.2
12 14 16 18 20
# Barbers Available
Tot
al H
ours
To
Com
plet
e R
-Day
21Researching the Army’s Future
Developing Tomorrow’s Leaders
Increase the Size of the CorpsIncrease the Size of the Corps
Time to Complete R-Day
02468
101214
1144
1232
1320
1408
1496
1584
Number of Cadets
Tim
e (H
ours
)
11.9516283710.915843610.6515403510.421496349.831452339.851408329.451364319.051320308.8127629
8.781232288.681188278.25114426
Time toComplete
R-DayCadetsBus
Trips
• Bottom Line: Time to complete R-day showslinear growth with increasing size of Corps
22Researching the Army’s Future
Developing Tomorrow’s Leaders
Effect of Decreased ControlEffect of Decreased ControlFlow MeasuresFlow Measures
� When you decrease control flow measures, the amount of timeneeded to complete R-Day increases.
� SCENARIO: Allow Squad Leaders to randomly decide where to takehis/her squad until complete:
RESULT: 25:16 hours (Actual time = 7:46 AM, R-Day + 1)
� SCENARIO: Ignore the counters at the various stations:
RESULT: Approximately 16:30 hours (Actual time = 10:30 PM)
23Researching the Army’s Future
Developing Tomorrow’s Leaders
SimRunnerSimRunner OptimizationOptimization
� Picked four critical parameters� Understand the interaction of:
� Bus Arrival Rates� Squad Leader Pick-Up Arrival Rates� Squad Leaders Available� Barbers Available
24Researching the Army’s Future
Developing Tomorrow’s Leaders
SimRunnerSimRunner Optimization FunctionOptimization Function
xi = average time at stations 1, 2,…i (ai is theassociated weight for each station)
xj = number of minutes to complete R-Day (bj isthe associated weight for each station)
xk = cost per bus driver, barber, and squad leader(ck is the associated weight for each station)
xl = % complete at stations 1, 2,…l (dl is theassociated weight for each station)
xm = total throughput of the simulation (em is theassociated weight for each station)
25Researching the Army’s Future
Developing Tomorrow’s Leaders
SimRunnerSimRunner Optimization FunctionOptimization Function
� Objective Function:
Min z1 = ∑ aixi +∑ bjxj +∑ ckxk
Max z2 = ∑ dlxl +∑ emxm
z0 = z2 - z1
26Researching the Army’s Future
Developing Tomorrow’s Leaders
SimRunnerSimRunner OptimizationOptimization ResultsResults
8
8
9
6
6
6
6
7
7
7
Bus ArrivalRates (Min)
27077.671121314
27077.671121214
27116.028121214
27168.011121214
27222.004121314
27245.455121414
27245.455121514
27248.613121414
27248.613121514
27248.613121314
ObjectiveFunction
Number ofAvailableBarbers
Number of SquadLeaders Available
(per Company)
Squad LeaderPick-Up Arrival
Rates (Min)
27Researching the Army’s Future
Developing Tomorrow’s Leaders
SimRunnerSimRunner OptimizationOptimization ResultsResults
Average 14Average 13~15~8Actual for 2005
Average 14Average 13~10~9Actual for 2004
1614148One FactorOptimization
1213147Four FactorOptimization
Number ofAvailableBarbers
Number ofSquad Leaders
Available(per Company)
Squad LeaderPick-Up Arrival
Rates (Min)
Bus ArrivalRates (Min)Method
28Researching the Army’s Future
Developing Tomorrow’s Leaders
Study ConclusionsStudy Conclusions� Limited resources requiring non-linear utilization can be
optimized by establishing flexible process thresholds whichallow freedom of execution.
� Process thresholds need to be subjectively altered by a centralcommand (operations center) throughout the day to maximizethroughput.
� Real-time information of status of key areas is required toallow system administrators (squad leaders) and centralcommand (operations center) to execute tasks in a timelymanner.
� Impact to USMA and the Army:� Efficiency (2005 process shaved nearly 30 minutes from 2004 time2005 process shaved nearly 30 minutes from 2004 time)� Cost-savings
29Researching the Army’s Future
Developing Tomorrow’s Leaders
SummarySummary
� Commercial simulation software such asProModel can be utilized to model linearand non-linear processes to provide insightinto system enhancements.
Operations Research Center of ExcellenceResearching the Army’s Future
Developing Tomorrow’s Leaders
U S M A
QuestionsQuestions
LTC Simon R. GoergerAssistant Professor and ORCEN [email protected]
Operations Research Center of ExcellenceResearching the Army’s Future
Developing Tomorrow’s Leaders
U S M A
Using Commercial Simulation Software toUsing Commercial Simulation Software toModel Linear and NonModel Linear and Non--Liner Processes: USLiner Processes: US
Military Academy ReceptionMilitary Academy Reception--DayDaySimulation and OptimizationSimulation and Optimization
Thursday, 27 October 2005Thursday, 27 October 2005
LTC Simon R. Goerger, PhD2LT Stephen P. Fuller2LT Jeffrey D. Glick2LT Thomas P. KavanaughMr. Arlan C. Sheets
8th Annual8th AnnualSystems EngineeringSystems Engineering
ConferenceConference