Upload
angelica-harbor
View
215
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Three-Point Binding Model
• First proposed by Ogsten (1948) to explain biological enantioselection/enantiospecificity
• Serves as a model for chromatographic chiral stationary phases
Preferential binding occurs via intramolecular non-covalent forces:
H-bondingsalt bridgeIonicDipole-dipoleVan der Waals
CH2OH moieties are different because of non-equivalent binding sites in the enzyme
Enantioselection by an Enzyme
OH OH
OH
OH OPO3
OHH
* 2-glycerol kinase
achiral 3-glycerol phosphate
Three-Point Binding Model - Enantiospecificity
• Only one enantiomer binds to enzyme & is involved in reaction
B D
A
C B D
A
C
dbc
dbc
3 interactions
good fit, high H
C D
A
B
A D
B
C
dbc
poor fit, low H
1 interaction
dbc
poor fit, low H
2 interactions
With the other enantiomer…
we get enantiospecificity (substrate & biomolecule are chiral)
• To do this efficiently, we need a large biomolecule to align three binding sites to give high specificity
• One problem with model:– Model is a static representation → “lock & key”
Binding
• The cost of binding:
Km (Michaelis constant): small value indicates high affinity for substrate
Kbinding ( ~ 1/Km)
Strong binding → K > 1
ΔG= -RT ln KΔG must be –ve
E S+ E.S (Michaelis Complex)K
ΔGbinding = ΔHbinding- TΔSbinding
For 2 molecules in, 1 out: ΔS is –ve
(-TΔS) term is +ve Entropy disfavors binding of substrate to enzyme
To get good binding, need –ve ΔH (i.e. bond formation)
• Each non-covalent interaction is small (H-bond ~ 5 kcal/mol), but still gives a –ve ΔH
• Enzymes use many FG’s to sum up many weak non-covalent interactions (i.e. 3 points)
Back to tyrosyl-tRNA synthase:
NH3
O
O
OH
P
O
O
Adenosine O P
O
O
O OP
O
O
NH3
O
O
OH
P
O
Adenosine
O
O
R
OHOH
B
O
R
OHO
B
NH3
O
OH
tRNA Tyr
+
+
+
Tyrosyl-tRNA synthase
• Use binding to orient CO2- nucleophile adjacent to P
specifically as electrophile → specificity
• Many non-covalent interactions overcome entropy of binding: H-bonds
OH
Tyrosine + ATP + Enz Enz.Tyr .ATP Enz.Tyr--AMP + H2P2O73-
(released)
bind tRNA
Enz.Tyr--AMP . tRNAEnz.Tyr--OtRNA + AMP
(released)
Enz + Tyr--OtRNA
Can isolate this complex in the absence of tRNA
Tyrosyl-tRNA Synthase.tyr-adenylate
*
* ** Main chain contacts
Tyr specificity
Binding AAs
3 point binding enantiospecificity
Bind ATP
ATP, not dATP
*
* ** Main chain contacts
-O
P
P
Orient PO4 towards CO2
-
Increase P+
• We have examined the crystal structure of tyrosyl-tRNA synthase (Tyr & ATP bound)– Key contacts– 3 point binding model for (S)-tyrosine
• We inferred geometry of bound ATP prior to reaction (i.e. ATP is no longer bound to enzyme)
Step 1:
• CO2- attacks PO4
2- () giving pentacoordinate P (trigonal bipyramidal) intermediate
O
O
P
O
-O O-O
AdO
O
P
O
-OO
-O
Ad+
Step 2:• Diphosphate must leave
• Cannot “see” this step PPi has already left the enzyme site in the crystal structure
• However, can use model building to include P & P of ATP:
Thr40 & His45 form H-bonds to P
**Stronger H-bonds are formed in TS than in trig. Bipyramidal intermediate
Lower TS energy accelerate collapse of intermediate
Gln195
Tests of Mechanism
1) Site-directed mutagenesis– Replace Gln195 with Gly (Gln195Gly)
• Rate slows by > 1000 fold• ΔΔG ~ 4 kcal/mol• Developing -ve charge (on oxygen) in TS is no longer
stabilized• Energy diagram?• Other mutants:
– Tyr34Phe– His48Gly– These other mutations showed smaller decreases in
ΔG– All contribute in some way to stabilize TS
2) Do Thr-40 & His-45 really bind / phosphates?
Thr 40 Ala ( 7000 fold)
His 45 Gly ( 300 fold)
Both decelerate the reaction
Double mutant 300,000 fold slower!
A Chemical Model for Adenylate Reaction
Mimic the proximity effect in an enzyme with small organic molecules:
O
OP O
O
O
O
NO2 OP
O
O
O
O
-O NO2
+
Detect by UVRate is comparable to tyrosyl-adenylate formation unimolecular reaction
Step 3: • 3’-OH attacks acyl
adenylate• -ve charge increases on
O of carbonyl H-bonding stabilizes this charge (more in TS than in SM)
H-bonding (of Gln) is “more important” for TS
OHtRNA
• Step 2 leads to adenylate; CO2H group is now activated
• Once activated, tRNAtyr-OH can bind
X-ray Structure of tRNAGln
• Example of tRNA bound to tRNA synthase (stable without Gln)
• tRNA (red) binds to enzyme via multiple H-bonds
• 3’-OH oriented close to ATP (consistent with proposed mechanism in tyrosyl-tRNA)
3-’OH
ATP
Unique Role of Methionine
• Recall, Methionine is the 1st amino acid in a peptide/protein (start codon)
• As seen previously, Met is also formylated
NH2
S
HO2CNH2
S
O
OtRNA N
H
S
O
OtRNA H
OtRNA OH
H X
O
Met Met-tRNA fMetfMet-tRNA fMet
fMet
From N-formyltetrahydrofolate
protected
Protection with formyl group allows condensation one way around only (only one nucleophile)
Reaction is catalysed by becoming pseud-intramolecular (recall DNA template synthesis): Ribosome holds pieces together Ribosome is cellular “workbench”
tRNAfMet falls off P site
Dipeptide moves over to P
site
Control of Sequence
• mRNA (messenger RNA) made by copying sequence of DNA in gene
• Goes to ribosome, along with rRNA (ribosomal RNA-part of ribosome structure) & tRNA (with AAs attached)
• In mRNA, 3 nucleotides of specific sequence encode 1 amino acid (CODON)
• R-tRNAR has 3 nucleotides complementary through base pairing to the codon for R
• Specific binding at A site• Codons for start & stop control the final protein length
dTdAdC
dAdTdA
dGdCdT
5'
3'
DNA
RNA polymerase
Transcription
AUG
UAU
CGA
mRNA
UAC
AUA
CODON Met
Tyr
P site
A site
Rxn & translocation
AUA
GCU
AGC
UAU
CGA
mRNA
MetTyr
Arg
P site
A site
Met Tyr ArgH NH
O
O
O
Catalysis of Reaction?• Synthesis on ribosome is faster by 107 than rxn without
ribosome• Peptide formation is not catalyzed by protein → no protein
within 20 Ǻ of “active site”• rRNA (catalytic RNA) has been proposed :
N
R
O
O
H
H
tRNA
N
N
NN
NH2
O
pep
O
tRNA
NH
R
O
O
tRNA
O
tRNAO
pep
H
N
N
NN
NH2
NH
R
O
O
tRNA
O
pep
N
N
NN
NH2
OH
A2486
+
tRNA
Adenosine from rRNA
• However, modification of bases has shown little effect on catalytic activity (2-fold decrease)
• May be the 2’-OH (of tRNA) at last nucleotide on P site: i.e., the substrate! (see Nature Struct. Mol. Biol. (2004), 11, p 1101
Modified sugar at 3’OH:
• OH → H
• OH → F
Both substitutions reduce rate by 106!
adenosine
Why the Reduction in the Rate?
Accounts for most of rate acceleration e.g. of catalytic RNA & substrate catalysis
O
O
O O
A76
tRNA
O
H
O
OA76
tRNA
O O
ONH2
R
P site A site