Upload
vittorio-tarabella
View
213
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
HISTORICAL PAPER
Thomas Annandale: the first meniscus repair
Berardo Di Matteo • Vittorio Tarabella •
Giuseppe Filardo • Anna Vigano • Patrizia Tomba •
Maurilio Marcacci
Received: 26 January 2013 / Accepted: 25 March 2013
� Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013
Abstract A biographical insight about nineteenth century
Scottish surgeon Thomas Annandale (1838–1907),
describing his life and his milestone contribution to the
orthopaedics field, particularly analysing the first meniscus
repair in history, that Annandale performed in 1883 and
documented in his original paper titled ‘‘An Operation for
Displaced Semilunar Cartilage’’ (1885). The experience of
Annandale marks a shift in the treatment of meniscal
injuries, by introducing the practice of restoring and
repairing the original status of the tissue.
Keywords Meniscal repair � Meniscectomy � History of
medicine � Thomas Annandale
Introduction
Meniscal lesions are one of the most common orthopaedic
diseases, and their annual incidence can be estimated at
60–70 per 100,000 knees [11], in constant growth mainly
due to the increase in sport practice in all age groups.
Therefore, every day, orthopaedic practitioners face the
management of such lesions, whose treatment should never
be underestimated, because of the peculiar role played by
meniscal tissue in the maintenance of knee homoeostasis
and its fundamental contribution to congruency, stability,
load distribution, and shock absorption, as well as lubri-
cation and proprioception [9, 12, 16].
Approaching a meniscal lesion requires a careful eval-
uation: it is fundamental to understand that each treatment
should be tailored to the individual, specific patient and to
the overall status of the joint. At present, several options are
available: from ‘‘masterly’’ neglecting surgical approach
(i.e. conservative management) to meniscal resection,
meniscal suturing or even meniscal replacement by scaf-
folds or allografts. Each of these approaches has different
indications, and the right choice depends on the patient’s
intrinsic features, aetiology and comorbidities in the knee,
such as cartilage status and axial alignment [5]. Meniscal
treatment algorithms have changed markedly over time
[15], especially in recent years when new possibilities have
emerged after the introduction of meniscal allograft
replacement into clinical practice [7, 18] and, more
recently, bio-engineered meniscal scaffolds based on col-
lagen or polyurethane [6, 10, 14]. Furthermore, as for each
medical achievement, the way to reach such ambitious
goals has been quite long and it is the result of more than a
century-long evolution process. In medical history, there is
evidence of loose bodies removal from the knee joint since
1558, performed by Ambrose Pare [13]; after him, a number
of important surgeons have contributed to the development
of this orthopaedic field, especially from the twentieth
century onward. This paper focuses on the achievement of
Dr. Thomas Annandale, a Scottish surgeon who can be
considered the stage-setter of meniscal surgery [13, 15]: he
was the first to attempt and successfully perform a repair of
the meniscus in a way aimed at preserving its function and
structure, by carefully suturing back a displaced semilunar
cartilage (i.e. the meniscus) to its original position, thus
restoring the joint movements and opening the road to a new
surgical approach to manage meniscal injuries.
B. Di Matteo (&) � V. Tarabella � G. Filardo � M. Marcacci
Biomechanics Laboratory, Rizzoli Orthopaedic Institute,
Via di Barbiano n. 1/10, 40136 Bologna, Italy
e-mail: [email protected]
A. Vigano � P. Tomba
Donazione Putti, Biblioteche Scientifiche Istituto Ortopedico
Rizzoli, Rizzoli Orthopaedic Institute, Via Pupilli n. 1,
40136 Bologna, Italy
123
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc
DOI 10.1007/s00167-013-2490-3
Thomas Annandale
Thomas Annandale (Fig. 1) was born in Newcastle-on-
Tyne, UK, on 2nd November 1838, as the second son of
local surgeon Thomas Annandale sr. [8]: he was early
introduced to the medical practice by his father, and at the
age of 15, he had already started to assist him at the
Newcastle Infirmary where he learnt the basics of his
professional future. He then attended the University of
Edinburgh and graduated in 1860 with the highest honours,
winning the gold medal for his thesis on ‘‘The Injuries and
Diseases of the Hip-joint’’ [17].
The same year he became House Surgeon to the Edin-
burgh Royal Infirmary and a trainee under Professor James
Syme, chair of clinical surgery at Edinburgh University:
Annandale showed such talent and quality that Syme
appointed him as his personal assistant until his death in
1870.
He was lecturer on the principles of surgery in the
extramural school in Edinburgh from 1863, becoming
Acting Surgeon in 1871, and Regius Professor of Clinical
Surgery at the University in 1877. In this lapse of time, he
published 77 medical papers spanning from general surgery
to orthopaedics, from otolaryngology to urology.
On 5th July 1877, Annandale performed the first suc-
cessful orchiopexy in medical history: he treated a 3-year-
old boy with pain in the perineum caused by a displaced
testicle, by restoring it to its natural and correct position in
the scrotum and stitching it to the bottom of the scrotum to
obtain a permanent retention. He wrote about this landmark
operation in his 1879 article entitled ‘‘Case in which a
testicle congenitally displaced into the perineum was suc-
cessfully transferred to the scrotum’’ [3]. As revealed by
the article, Annandale was also very receptive and inter-
ested in the increasingly popular (for that time) concept of
performing surgery according to the principles of antiseptic
procedures stated by the epoch-making works of his con-
temporary Joseph Lister, the pioneer of antiseptic surgery.
In 1900, he was honoured by the Queen of England with
the role of Surgeon General to the Life-Archers of the Royal
Scottish Life-Guard, the royal bodyguards in Scotland, a
corps to which he had belonged as an archer since 1870.
He was found dead in his bed at home in Edinburgh on
20 December 1907, at the age of 69: he had operated up
until the day before his death.
In 1908, the Journal of the American Medical Associ-
ation celebrated his outstanding career and life describing
him as ‘‘one of the most notable surgeons associated with
the Edinburgh school; an enthusiastic leader in all move-
ments for the good of students’’; he was regarded to have
‘‘a ready wit, a keen sense of humor’’, and to be ‘‘a very
skilled surgeon and a lecturer to whom it was always a
pleasure to listen’’ [4].
Annandale’s meniscal procedures
This paper focuses on a specific procedure performed by
Thomas Annandale in 1883, which was an arthrotomy
aimed at repairing a displaced semilunar cartilage in the
knee joint: the first successful operation of meniscus repair.
Annandale himself described this operation in his paper
dated 1885: ‘‘An operation for displaced semilunar carti-
lage’’ [1].
Being a professor at heart, the author begins the article
as a university lecture, by explaining the theory and the
knowledge of the time about the pathology:
‘‘The pathology of the condition called by that wise old
surgeon Hey of Leeds, ‘‘internal derangement of the knee-
joint’’; by Sir Astley Cooper, ‘‘partial luxation of the thigh-
bone from the semilunar cartilage’’, and which is now by
some authors termed dislocation or displacement of the
semilunar cartilage, has not yet been thoroughly worked
out, as few opportunities occur for the dissection of a joint
so affected. It is, however, a clinical fact that one of the
semilunar cartilage, usually the internal one, does occa-
sionally become loosened from its attachments; and, in
consequence, this body is liable to be displaced either
forwards or backwards, and so to interfere with the proper
movements of the knee-joint’’.
According to the case reports known to Annandale, this
kind of pathology could occur in two different ways:Fig. 1 A picture of Dr. Thomas Annandale
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc
123
abruptly, following a ‘‘twist or wrench of the knee’’, or as a
‘‘gradual stretching of the attachments of the cartilage’’
owing to ‘‘some effusion in the joints’’ or to ‘‘some con-
tinued strain upon the joint’’. In the latter case, Annandale
assumed that causes were due to specific occupations.
It was known to Annandale that this condition tended to
become chronic and could occur at every slight movement
of the joint as a consequence of a rupture of the ligamen-
tous attachments. To this regard, Annandale writes: ‘‘The
movements of the joints may be merely stiffened in one
direction, or the joint itself may be firmly locked, and
remain so until manipulation returns the displaced
cartilage’’.
Here is the focus point: ‘‘manipulation’’ was the stan-
dard procedure to treat this pathology, by applying forced
flexion and extension to the joint in order to reduce the
displaced cartilage, then to keep it at rest with the aid of a
splint or bandage.
In 1883, a 30-year-old miner from the north of England
was sent to Annandale complaining of ‘‘acute pain in
certain movements of the joint, which frequently became
locked in the flexed position’’.
The miner remembered a sharp pain while working in a
kneeling position, followed by a debilitating swelling of the
joint: after being treated with manipulation, the swelling
was reduced, ‘‘but pain still continued, and the movements
of the joint were interfered with by something ‘slipping’ in
the knee’’.
It was the occasion Annandale was waiting for to try a
new procedure to definitively treat the pathology, a new
way to heal the patient and not only a way to temporarily
subdue the pain and restore some mobility.
Thomas Annandale was respected by his contemporaries
for his diligence, his perseverance and tireless devotion to
the practice: he was one of the first to understand the
necessity and importance to specialize his skills, constantly
studying and researching about human body and its
pathologies. Annandale was an innovator, a surgeon not
scared to go against the agreed tradition to find new ways
to improve the cure.
Here are Annandale’s words to describe his surgical
procedure of meniscal repair:
‘‘An incision was made along the upper and inner border
of the tibia, parallel with the anterior margin of the internal
semilunar cartilage; and the few superficial vessels having
been secured, the joint was opened. It was then seen that
this semilunar cartilage was completely separated from its
attachments and was displaced backwards about half an
inch. The anterior edge of this cartilage was now seized by
a pair of artery catch forceps, and it was drawn forwards
into its natural position, and held there until three stitches
of chromic catgut were passed through it and through the
fascia and periosteum covering the margin of the tibia. The
forceps were then withdrawn, the cartilage remaining
securely stitched in position. The wound in the synovial
membrane and soft textures having been closed with catgut
stitches, a splint and Plaster-of-Paris bandage were applied,
so as to keep the joint at rest […].
Seven weeks after the operation, the splint and bandages
were removed, and gentle movements of the joint
practised’’.
About 6 months later, Annandale met the patient again
to check his condition and to examine the results of the
procedure in the long term: ‘‘he had perfect movement in
the joint, and had never had the slightest stiffness of
locking of the joint since he commenced to go about after
the operation’’.
After this success, the meniscal procedures became
more frequent in medical practice due to the good clinical
outcome achieved. In 1889, reporting about a case with
similarities, Annandale could state: ‘‘I think it may be
fairly said that operative interference in connection with-
injured or diseased semilunar cartilages has now become
an established procedure’’ [2]. In the aforementioned
paper, Annandale described an exemplar case of a semi-
lunar cartilage so separated from its attachments (Fig. 2) to
be irreparable: the only solution was an excision of its
greater part that allowed the patient a ‘‘perfect recovery’’
and a complete return to his normal life.
It is worthy of attention that Annandale, the pioneer of
this kind of surgery, performed both meniscal repair and
meniscectomy according to the specific meniscal condition,
thus demonstrating that each treatment option is related to
the particular clinical condition. The discussion about
correct indications started in Annandale’s times and is still
Fig. 2 Original picture representing the medial meniscal lesion
treated by Annandale by excision in 1889
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc
123
actual nowadays: the therapeutic options to address meni-
scal pathology are several, thus defining the right indica-
tions is crucial to obtain a positive clinical outcome at long
follow-up.
Conclusion
Meniscal treatments are everyday clinical practice for
orthopaedic surgeons. What now seems absolutely com-
mon to us was very different in the past: we have inves-
tigated the life and work of Thomas Annandale and his role
as forerunner of meniscal surgical treatment. The most
important current clinical indication for meniscal treatment
is to try to preserve meniscal tissue as much as possible
and, in case of previous meniscectomy, even to replace it
with scaffolds and allografts. It is interesting to point out
that the first documented operation performed on a
meniscus was not a resection but a reattachment, which is a
form of repair: the history of meniscal surgery started
130 years ago with the same conceptual principles that we
try to apply nowadays. Surely a lot has changed: the first
arthrotomic treatment here described required 70 days of
hospitalization before discharge (including the post-op
management), whereas today arthroscopic meniscal sur-
gery is essentially day-surgery activity.
Much has changed, but without the intuitions and the
pioneering works of innovative personalities like Annan-
dale, what we have achieved would not have been possible:
a sharp mind, a strong will and an imperishable desire to
learn and to convey knowledge made Thomas Annandale a
key figure in the history of medicine, and that is the reason
why he deserves to be properly acknowledged and
remembered.
Acknowledgments Authors would like to thank Liliana Draghetti
(Donazione Putti, Biblioteche Scientifiche, Rizzoli Orthopaedic
Institute) and Keith Smith (Task Force, Rizzoli Orthopaedic Institute)
for their help.
References
1. Annandale T (1885) An operation for displaced semilunar carti-
lage. Br Med J 1(1268):779
2. Annandale T (1889) Excision of the internal semilunar cartilage,
resulting in perfect restoration of the joint-movements. Br Med J
1(1467):291–292
3. Annandale T (1879) Case in which a testicle congenitally dis-
placed into the perinaeum was successfully transferred to the
scrotum. Br Med J 1(940):7
4. Fischer MC, Milen MT, Bloom DA (2005) Thomas Annandale
and the first report of a successful orchiopexy. J Urol 174(1):
37–39
5. Gomoll AH, Filardo G, Almqvist FK et al (2012) Surgical
treatment for early osteoarthritis. Part II: allografts and concur-
rent procedures. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc
10(3):468–486
6. Kon E, Filardo G, Zaffagnini S et al (2012) Biodegradable
polyurethane meniscal scaffold for isolated partial lesions or as
combined procedure for knees with multiple comorbidities:
clinical results at 2 years. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc.
doi:10.1007/s00167-012-2328-4
7. Marcacci M, Zaffagnini S, Marcheggiani Muccioli GM et al
(2012) Meniscal allograft transplantation without bone plugs: a
3-year minimum follow-up study. Am J Sports Med 40(2):
395–403
8. Mostofi SB (2004) Who’s who in orthopedics. Springer, London,
UK, pp 12–13
9. Renstrom P, Johnson RJ (1990) Anatomy and biomechanics of
the menisci. Clin Sports Med 9(3):523–538
10. Rodkey WG, DeHaven KE, Montgomery WH 3rd et al (2008)
Comparison of the collagen meniscus implant with partial men-
iscectomy. A prospective randomized trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am
90(7):1413–1426
11. Scotti C, Pozzi A, Mangiavini L et al (2009) Healing of meniscal
tissue by cellular fibrin glue: an in vivo study. Knee Surg Sports
Traumatol Arthrosc 17(6):645–651
12. Thompson WO, Thaete FL, Fu FH, Dye SF (1991) Tibial men-
iscal dynamics using three-dimensional reconstruction of mag-
netic resonance images. Am J Sports Med 19(3):210–215
13. Timbrell Fisher AG (1924) Internal derangements of the knee-
joint. The MacMillan Company, New York, NY, pp 4–22
14. Verdonk P, Beaufils P, Bellemans J et al (2012) Successful
treatment of painful irreparable partial meniscal defects with a
polyurethane scaffold: two-year safety and clinical outcomes. Am
J Sports Med 40(4):844–853
15. Verdonk R (2011) The meniscus: past, present and future. Knee
Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19(2):145–146
16. Walker PS, Erkman MJ (1975) The role of the menisci in force
transmission across the knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res 109:184–192
17. Watson HMD (1908) Memorial of the Late Professor Annandale.
Br Med J 1(2477):1555
18. Wirth CJ, Peters G, Milachowski KA, Weismeier KG, Kohn D
(2002) Long-term results of meniscal allograft transplantation.
Am J Sports Med 30(2):174–181
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc
123