US EPA RECORDS CENTER REGION 5us EPA RECORDS CENTER REGION 5

111111111111 11111 ""111"111"111111111 441997441997

THIRD FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORTTHIRD FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT

for thefor the

TOMAH FAIRGROUNDS LANDFILL SITETOMAH FAIRGROUNDS LANDFILL SITE

City of Tomah, Monroe County,City of Tomah, Monroe County, WisconsinWisconsin

Prepared by: United States Environmental Protection Agency

Region Chicago, Illinois

Prepared by: United States Environmental Protection Agency

Region 55 Chicago, Illinois

September 2012September 2012

Approved by:Approved by:

X c \^J_^ Richard C. Karl, Director Superfund Division U.S. EPA Region

~CKL Richard C. Karl, Director Superfund Division u.s. EPA Region 55

q „t - / c ?

Date

'1- /0 Date

- j Z ,~J 2.­

[This page intentionally left blank]

2

' """*^'" '-«-". 'e««„^,,

Table of Contents Page

Table of Contents Section PageSection

44List of AcronymsList of Acronyms Executive Summary 55Executive Summary Five-Year Review Summary Form 66Five-Year Review Sunm1ary FOffi1

I.I. IntroductionIntroduction 99 10II.II. Site ChronologySite Chronology 10

III. BackgroundBackground 10III. 10 Physical Characteristics 10Physical Characteristics 10

Land and Resource UseLand and Resource Use 1010

HistoryHistory of Contaminationof Contamination 1111 Initial Response ActionsInitial Response Actions 1111 Basis for Taking (No Further) Action 1111Basis for Taking (No Further) Action

IV. Remedial ActionsRemedial Actions 12IV. 12 Selected Remedial ActionsSelected Remedial Actions 1212

Remedy ImplementationRemedy Implementation 1212

Institutional ControlsInstitutional Controls 1212

Long-Long-Tenn StewardshipTenn Stewardship 1313 Operation and Maintenance (O&M) 14Operation and Maintenance (O&M) 14

15V.V. ProgressProgress Since the Last Five-Year ReviewSince the Last Five-Year Review 15 VI.VI. Five-Five-Year Review ProcessYear Review Process 1515

Administrative ComponentsAdministrative Components 1515 Community Notification and InvolvementCommunity Notification and Involvement 1515

Reviewed 16DocumentsDocuments Reviewed 16 Data ReviewedData Reviewed 1616 Site InspectionSite Inspection 1616

VII.VII. Technical AssessmentTechnical Assessment 1616 Question A:Question A: Is the remedy functioning as intended by the decision documents?Is the remedy functioning as intended by the decision documents? 1616 Question B: Are the exposure assumptions, toxicity data, cleanup levels, andQuestion B: Are the exposure assumptions, toxicity data, cleanup levels, and remedial action objectives used at the time of the remedy still valid?remedial action objectives used at the time of the remedy still valid? 1717 Question C: any other infonnation come to light that could call into questionQuestion C: HasHas any other infonnation come to light that could call into question the protectiveness of the remedy?the protectiveness of the remedy? 1717 Teclinical Assessment SummaryTechnical Assessment SUl1ill1ary 1818

V m , IssuesIssues 18VIII. 18 IX.IX. Recommendations and Follow-up ActionsRecommendations and Follow-up Actions 1818 X.x. Protectiveness StatementProtectiveness Statement 1919 XI.XI. Next ReviewNext Review 2020

Table 1; Clironology of EventsChronology of Events 10Table 1: 10 Table 2: Institutional ControlsTable 2: 13Institutional Controls 13 Table 3: Actions Taken Since the Last Five-Year ReviewTable 3: Actions Taken Since the Last Five-Year Review 1515 Table 4: IssuesIssues 18Table 4: 18 Table 5: Recommendations and Follow-up ActionsTable 5: 19Recol1ill1endations and Follow-up Actions 19

Figures and Attachments 21Figures and Attachments 21 3

ARARARARATSDRATSDRCERCLACERCLA

EPAEPAESESFYRFYRCFRCFR HRSHRS ICsICsICIAPICIAP LTSLTS MCLMCL MCLGMCLG NCPNCP NFANFA NPLNPL Oi&MO&M PRPPRP RARA RDRD RI/FSRIfFS RODROD SDWASDWA USGSUSGS VOCVOC WACWAC WDNRWDNR

List of AcronymsList of Acronyms

Applicable or Relevant and Appropriate RequirementApplicable or Relevant and Appropriate Requirement Agency for Toxic Substance and Disease Registr}'Agency for Toxic Substance and Disease Registry Comprehensive Enviromnental Response, Compensation, and Liability ActComprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (Superfund)(Superfund) United States Enviromllental Protection AgencyUnited States Enviromnental Protection Agency (Wisconsin Administrative Code Ch. NR 140) Enforcement Standard(Wisconsin Administrative Code Ch. NR 140) Enforcement Standard Five-Year ReviewFive-Year Review Code of Federal RegulationsCode of Federal Regulations Hazard Ranking SystemHazard Ranking System Institutional ControlsInstitutional Controls Institutional Controls Implementation and Assurance PlanInstitutional Controls Implementation and Assurance Plan Long Term StewardshipLong Tern1 Stewardship Maximum Contaminant LevelMaximum Contaminant Level Maximum Contaminant Level GoalMaximum Contaminant Level Goal National Contingency PlanNational Contingency Plan No Further ActionNo Further Action National Priorities ListNational Priorities List Operation and MaintenanceOperation and Maintenance Potentially PartyPotentially ResponsibleResponsible Party Remedial ActionRemedial Action Remedial DesignRemedial Design Remedial Investigation/Feasibi lity StudyRemedial Investigation/Feasibility Study Record of DecisionRecord of Decision Safe Drinking Water ActSafe Drinking Water Act United States Geological SurveyUnited States Geological Survey Volatile Organic CompoundVolatile Organic Compound Wisconsin Administrative CodeWisconsin Administrative Code Wisconsin Department of Natural ResourcesWisconsin Department of Natural Resources

4

Executive SummaryExecutive Summary

The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), in consultation with the WisconsinThe United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), in consultation with the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (WDNR), has completed the third Five-Year Review (FYR) atDepartment of Natural Resources (WDNR), has completed the third Five-Year Review (FYR) at the Tomah Fairgrounds Landfill (TFL) site located in Tomah, Monroe County, Wisconsin.the Tomah Fairgrounds Landfill (TFL) site located in Tomah, Monroe County, Wisconsin. EPA's conduct of the third FYR at the TFL site was triggered by the completion of the secondEPA's conduct of the third FYR at the TFL site was triggered by the completion of the second FYR Report on September 21, 2007.FYR Report on September 21, 2007.

EPA selected "No Further Action" (NFA) as the finalfinal cleanup remedy for the TFL sitesite in theEPA selected "No Further Action" (NFA) as the cleanup remedy for the TFL in the 1996 Record of Decision (ROD). EPA selected the NFNFAA remedy after confirming that the city of1996 Record of Decision (ROD). EPA selected the remedy after confirming that the city of Tomah had entered into aa Consent Order with WDNR to conduct groundwater monitoring at theTomah had entered into Consent Order with WDNR to conduct groundwater monitoring at the sitesite and that the city had placed institutional controls (lCs) on the property to limit its reuse.and that the city had placed institutional controls (ICs) on the property to limit its reuse. EPA has detennined that the site conditions that allowed the Agency to choose the NFNFAA remedyEPA has detennined that the site conditions that allowed the Agency to choose the remedy in the 1996 ROD have not changed and that the remedy continues to be protective of human health and the environment.health and the environment. Specifically, ICs remain in place, preventing any future land uses in the 1996 ROD have not changed and that the remedy continues to be protective of human

Specifically, ICs remain in place, preventing any future land uses that might expose buried waste at the site.that might expose buried waste at the site.

The NFNFAA remedy is protective of human health and the environment because the landfill capThe remedy is protective of human health and the environment because the landfill cap prevents contact with buried waste, groundwater beneath the site meets cleanupprevents contact with buried waste, groundwater beneath the site meets groundwatergroundwater cleanup goals, and exposures are not occurring. Long-temi protectiveness of the remedy will begoals, and exposures are not occurring. Long-tem1 protectiveness of the NFNFAA remedy will be ensured through continued compliance with land-use restrictions that prohibit interference withensured through continued compliance with land-use restrictions that prohibit interference with the existing soil cap. The city of Tomah recently submitted an IC Study wherein it committedthe existing soil cap. The city of Tomah recently submitted an IC Study wherein it committed itself to long-term stewardship of the TFL site, including maintaining, monitoring, and enforcingitself to long-term stewardship of the TFL site, including maintaining, monitoring, and enforcing effective ICs.effective ICs.

EPA designated the TFL site as "construction complete" in February and deleted the siteEPA designated the TFL site as "construction complete" in February 20020011 and deleted the site from the Superfund National Priorities List (NPL) in August 2001. Because hazardousfrom the Superfund National Priorities List (NPL) in August 2001. Because hazardous substances, pollutants, or contaminants remain in place at the TFL site above levels that allow forsubstances, pollutants, or contaminants remain in place at the TFL site above levels that allow for unlimited use and unrestricted exposure (UU/UE), EPA will complete fourth FYR withinunlimited use and unrestricted exposure (UU/UE), EPA will complete aa fourth FYR within fivefive years of the date of this Report.years of the date of this Report.

5

Third Five-Year Review Summary FormThird Five-Year Review Summary Form

SITE IDENTIFICATIONSITE IDENTIFICATION

Site name (from WasteLAN): Tomah Fairgrounds LandfillSite name (from WasteLAN): Tomah Fairgrounds Landfill ----------------------1

EPA ID (from WasteLAN): WI980616841EPA ID (from WasteLAN): WI980616841

Region: 5 State: Wl City/County: Tomah / Monroe County

SITE STATUS

NPL status: 0 FinallRl Deleted 0 Other (specify)D Final SNPL status: Deleted n Other (specify)---------------------1

Remediation status (choose all that apply): IJ Under Construction 0 Operating Complete

Multiple OUs?*Multiple OUs?* D YES0 YES 0a NO Construction completion date: 2 /jfS /2001

Remediation status (choose all that apply): IH Under Construction D Operating lRlS Complete

NO Construction completion date: £._ /--.11 /2001t----------------'----------.---------------I

Has site been put into reuse? M YES D NOHas site been put into reuse? 0 YES 0 NO

REVIEW STATUSREVIEW STATUS

Lead agency:Lead agency: M EPA D State0 EPA 0 State oD TribeTribe D Other Federal Agency)ther Federal Agency0 (

Author name: David LinnearAuthor name: David Linnear

Author title: Remedial Project Author affil iation: U.S. EPA, Region 55Author title: Remedial Project Author affiliation: U.S. EPA, Region ManagerManager

Review period:** 1Review per iod:" 11_8 /2012/8/2012 toto 6/29/2016/29/201 22

Date(s)Date(s) of site inspection:of site inspection: 2/28 /20122J2~ 12012

o Pre-SAP,A [] NP L-Removalonly D Non-NPL Remedial Action Site oD NPL StateAfribe-ieadNPL ~ e-Iead Regional Discretion)

TypeType of review: Hof review: [RJ Post-SARAPost-SARA D Pre-SAFJA D NPL-Removal only o Non-NPL Remedial Action Site ,tateffrib 0D Regional Discretion)

Review number:Review number: D0 11 (first)(first) D0 22 (second) [2~ ) D Other (specify)(second) [>0 33 (third(third I 0 Other (specify)

Triggering action:Triggering action: D Actual RA On-site Construction at OU _o Actual RA On-site Construction at au ##__ n Actual RA Start at 0U# _NA·:ual RA Start at OU# NA[] Ac

D Construction Completiono Construction Completion E l Previous Five-Year Review ReportreviolJs Five-Year Review ReportC~ P D Other (specify)o Other (specify)

Triggering action date (from WasteLAN):3__l2/[,/200ZTriggering action date (from WasteLAN):J) 107

Due date (five years after triggering action date): JL121 /2012Due date (five years after triggering action date): _!~Jl.11 2012

* ["aU" refers to operable Unit.]["OU" refers to operable unit.;

6

Issues/RecommendationsIssues/Recommendations

. . ..

OU(~) withoutlssues/Recommendations Identified in the Five-Year Review:OU(s) without Issues/Recommendations Identified in the Five-Year Review:

NoneNone

Issues and Recommendations Identified in the Five-Year Review:.Issues and Recommendations Identified in the Five-Year Review: |

OU(s): 11 Issue Category: Institutional ControlsOU(s): Issue Category: Institutional Controls

Issue: AA review of site ICs is needed to assure that the remedy continuesIssue: review of site ICs is needed to assure that the remedy continues to function as intended and to ensure that effective procedures are in-placetofijnctionas intended and to ensure that effective procedures are in-place for long-tem1 stewardship at the site.for long-term stewardship at the site.

Recommendation: The draft IC investigation/study submitted AprilRecommendation: The draft IC invesfigafion/study submitted April 2012 is under review by EPA and WDNR. Once completed it will be2012 is under review by EPA and WDNR. Once completed it will be approved or an ICIAP will be required for additional work.approved or an IClAP will be required for additional work.

Affect CurrentAffect Current Affect FutureAffect Future ImplementingImplementing OversightOversight MilestoneMilestone ProtectivenessProtectiveness ProtectivenessProtectiveness PartyParty PartyParty DateDate

NoNo YesYes City of TomahCity of Tomah U.S. EPAU.S. EPA Sept. 2013Sept. 2013

Issues and Recommendations Identified in the Five-Year Review:Issues and Recommendations Identified in the Five-Year Review: |

Issue Category: Operation and MaintenanceOU(s): 11OU{s): Issue Category: Operation and Maintenance

Issue: Waste remains in place, but aa long-term cover maintenance plan isIssue: Waste remains in place, but long-term cover maintenance plan is lacking.lacking.

Recommendation: Develop WDNR-approved cover maintenance plan.

Implementing MilestoneMilestone

Recommendat ion: Develop WDNR-approved cover maintenance plan.

Affect CurrentAffect Current Affect FutureAffect Future Implementing OversightOversight Party DateProtectivenessProtectiveness ProtectivenessProtectiveness Party PartyParty Date

No Yes City of Tomah State Sept. 2013No Yes City of Tomah State Sept. 2013

1 Issues and Recommendations Identified in the Five-Year Review:Issues and Recommendations Identified in the Five~Year Review:

OU(s): 11OU(s): Issue Category: Operation and MaintenanceIssue Category: Operation and Maintenance

Issue: Unused groundwater monitoring wells should be abandoned perIssue: Unused groundwater monitoring wells should be abandoned per WACCh. NR141.WAC Ch. NR 141.

Recommendat ion: Plan and then conduct well abandonment inRecommendation: Plan and then conduct well abandonment in accordance with WAC Ch. NR 141.accordance with WAC Ch. NR 141.

Affect Current Affect Future Implementing Oversight MilestoneAffect Current Affect Future Implementing Oversight Milestone ProtectivenessProtectiveness Protectiveness Party PartyProtectiveness Party DateParty Date No YesNo Yes CityCity of Tomahof Tomah State Sept. 2013State Sept. 2013

7

Sitewide Protectiveness StatementSitewide Protectiveness Statement

ProtectivenessProtectiveness Determination:Determination: ProtectiveProtective

Statement:ProtectivenessProtectiveness Statement: The NFNFAA remedy is protective of human health and the environment because the landfill capThe remedy is protective of human health and the envirormient because the landfill cap prevents contact with buried waste, groundv/ater beneath the site meets groundwater cleanupprevents contact with buried waste, groundwater beneath the site meets groundwater cleanup goals, and exposures are not occumng. Long-term protectiveness of the remedy will begoals, and exposures are not OCCUlTing. Long-term protectiveness of the NFNFAA remedy will be ensured through continued compliance with land-use restrictions that prohibit interferenceensured through continued compliance with land-·use restrictions that prohibit interference with the existing soil cap. The city of Tomah recently submitted an IC Study wherein itwith the existing soil cap. The city of Tomah recently submitted an IC Study wherein it committed itself to long-tenn stewardship of the . site, including maintaining, monitoring,committed itself to long-tenn stewardship of the TFLTFL site, including maintaining, monitoring, and enforcing effective ICs.and enforcing effective ICs.

8

Third Five-Year Review ReportThird Five-Year Review Report Tomah Fairgrounds Landfill SiteToraah Fairgrounds Landfill Site

Tomah, Monroe County, WisconsinTomah, Monroe County, Wisconsin

I. IntroductionI. Introduction

The purpose of aa five-year review (FYR) is to determine whether aa remedy at aa site is protectiveThe purpose of five-year review (FYR) is to detennine whether remedy at site is protective of human health and the environment. The methods, findings,findings, and conclusions of reviews areof human health and the environment. The methods, and conclusions of reviews are documented in FYR reports. In addition, FYR repOlis identifY issues found during the review, ifdocumented in FYR reports. In addition, FYR reports identity issues found during the review, if any, and identifY recommendations to address them.any, and identify recommendations to address them.

The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) prepared this FYR report pursuant toThe United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) prepared this FYR report pursuant to CERCLA §121 and the National Contingency Plan (NCP). CERCLA §121 states:CERCLA §121 and the National Condngency Plan (NCP). CERCLA §121 states:

If the President selects aa remedial action that results in any hazardous substances, pollutants, orIf the President selects remedial action that results in any hazardous substances, pollutants, or contaminants remaining at the site. the President shall review such remedial action no less oftencontaminants remaining at the site, the President shall review such remedial action no less often than each fivefive years after the initiation ofsuch remedial action to assure that human health andthan each years after the initiation ofsuch remedial action to assure that human health and the environment are being protected by the remedial action being implemented. In addition, ?fthe environment are being protected by the remedial action being implemented. In addition, if upon such review it is the judgment ofthe President that action is appropriate at such site in accordance with section [104] oraccordance with section [104] or [106]. the President shall take or require such action.[106], the President shall take or require such action. The upon such review it is the judgment of the President that action is appropriate at such site in

The President shall report to the Congress aa list o.ffacilities for lyhich such review is required, thePresident shall report to the Congress list of facilities for which such review is required, the results ofall such reviews, and any actions taken as aa result ofsuch reviews.results of all such reviews, and any actions taken as result of such reviews.

The Agency interpreted this requirement further in the NCP, 40 CFR 300.430(t) (4) (ii) statesThe Agency interpreted this requirement further in the NCP, 40 CFR 300.430(f) (4) (ii) states

Ifaa remedial action is selected that results in hazardous substances, pollutants,If remedial action is selected that results in hazardous substances, pollutants, or contaminants remaining at the site above levels that allow for unlimited useor contaminants remaining at the site above levels that allow for unlimited use and unrestricted exposure, the lead agency shall review such action no lessand unrestricted exposure, the lead agency shall review such action no less often than every years after the initiation of the selected remedial action.often than everyfivefive years after the initiation ofthe selected remedial action.

EPA, in consultation with WDNR, has conducted the third FYR of the remedy implemented atEPA, in consultation with WDNR, has conducted the third FYR of the remedy implemented at the Tomah Fairgrounds Landfill (TFL) site located in Tomah, Monroe County, Wisconsin. Thethe Tomah Fairgrounds Landfill (TFL) site located in Tomah, Monroe County, Wisconsin. The third FYR was conducted by the EPA Remedial Project Manager (RPM) for the site fromthird FYR was conducted by the EPA Remedial Project Manager (RPM) for the site from September 2011 through June 2012. This report documents the results of the third FYR.September 2011 tlirough June 2012. This report documents the resuUs of the third FYR.

The triggering action for this statutory FYR is the date of the second FYR report was issued forThe triggering acfion for this statutory FYR is the date of the second FYR report was issued for the site (September 21, 2007). This FYR is required because hazardous substances, pollutants, orthe site (September 21, 2007). This FYR is required because hazardous substances, pollutants, or contaminants remain at the site above levels that allow for unlimited use and unrestrictedcontaminants remain at the site above levels that allow for unlimited use and unrestricted exposure (UU/UE). This FYR report will be placed in the site and local repository for theexposure (UUIUE). This FYR report will be placed in the site filesfiles and local repository for the TFL site at the Tomah Library, 716 Superior Ave., Tomah, Wisconsin.TFL site at the Tomah Library, 716 Superior Ave., Tomah, Wisconsin.

9

II. Site ChronologyII. Site Chronology

Table 11 (below) lists a chronology of events for the TFL site.Table (below) lists a chronology of events for the TFL site.

Table 1: Chronology of EventsTable 1: Chronology of Events

EventEvent DateDate

Initial discovery of contaminant problem

TFL site placed on Nafional Priorities List

Remedial Investigation

Initial discovery of contaminant problem

TFL site placed on National Priorities List

Remedial Investigation

1984

July 1987

.Tuly 1993-1996

984

Iy 1987

Iy 1993 - 1996

Ju

.Tu

--

ROD SignatureROD Signature September 1996eptember 1996S

Site Visit Inspection of completed workSite Visit // Inspection of completed work August 2000ugust 2000A

Close Out Report IssuedClose Out Report Issued February 2001:bruary 2001

TFL site deleted from NPLTFL site deleted from NPL August 2001ugust 2001A

First FYR report issued

Second FYR report issued

Third FYR report issued

First FYR report issued

Second FYR report issued

Third FYR report issued

September 2002

September 2007

September 2012

~ptember 2002

~ptember 2007

:ptember 2012

St

St

St

III.lIT. BackgroundBackground

Physical CharacteristicsPhysical Characteristics

The TFL site is located in the southeastem portion of the city of Tomah in Monroe County,The TFL site is located in the southeastem portion of the city of Tomah in Monroe County, Wisconsin (see Figure 1). The property covers roughly 37..5 acres, with the landfill itselfWisconsin (see Figure 1). The property covers roughly 37.5 acres, with the landfill itself occupying about 15 acres within the property boundaries. The landfill area is grass-covered. Theoccupying about 15 acres within the property boundaries. The landfill area is grass-covered. The site is bordered on the north by Grassman Street and residential area. Fair Street runs along thesite is bordered on the north by Grassman Street and aa residential area. Fair Street runs along the eastern border, angles across the southeast comer and borders the fairgrounds along the south.eastem border, angles across the southeast comer and borders the fairgrounds along the south. To the south and southwest are open and tlrree homes. To the west is an openTo the south and southwest are open fieldsfields and three homes. To the "vest is an open field.field. Access to the site is not restricted, i.e., the site is not fenced.Access to the site is not restricted, i.e., the site is not fenced.

Land and Resource UseLand and Resource Use

The site is used as parking lot during Fairground events and is zoned C-1: Lowland ResourceThe site is used as aa parking lot during Fairground events and is zoned C-l: Lowland Resource Conservancy District, Wisconsin designation that protects natural resources by prohibitingConservancy District, aa Wisconsin designation that protects natural resources by prohibiting

excavation, grading, etc. commercial/industrial area lies to the east of die site. Landfilling,filling, excavation, grading, etc. AA commerciallindustrial area lies to the east of the site. Land use south and west of the site is primarily agricultural and north of the site is residential. Threeuse south and west of the site is primarily agricultural and north of the site is residential. Three

1010

residences south of the site depend on private drinking water wells and the remaining residencesresidences south of the site depend on private drinking water wells and the remaining residences around the Fairgrounds are supplied drinking water by the city's municipal service.around the Fairgrounds are supplied drinking water by the city's municipal service.

History of ContaminationHistory of Contamination

The TFL site was operated by the city of Tomah as aa disposal site from 1955 until 1960. WasteThe TFL site was operated by the city of Tomah as disposal site from 1955 until 1960. Waste disposal methods consisted of excavating 66 to 88 feet of surface soil, landtilling waste materials, placing cover consisting of previously excavated topsoil, and grading. Some materialSome material disposal methods consisted of excavating to feet of surface soil, landfilling waste materials, placing aa cover consisting of previously excavated topsoil, and finalfinal grading. disposed of in the landfill may have been burned before it was buried. No disposal recordsdisposed of in the landfill may have been burned before it was buried. No disposal records regarding the types or quantities of material buried were maintained. However, EPA did obtainregarding the types or quantities of material buried were maintained. However, EPA did obtain records for the Tomah Municipal Sanitary Landfill, the site which succeeded the Tomahrecords for the Tomah Municipal Sanitary Landfill, the site which succeeded the Tomah Fairgrounds Landfill and Tomah ArnlOry sites as Tomah's waste disposal site. The MunicipalFairgrounds Landfill and Tomah Armory sites as Tomah's waste disposal site. The Municipal Landfill received aa mixture of municipal and industrial wastes. EPA assumed that Tomah'sLandfill received mixture of municipal and industrial wastes. EPA assumed that Tomah's earlier disposal sites received more or less the same kinds of waste.earlier disposal sites received more or less the same kinds of waste.

Initial Response ActionsInitial Response Actions

In 1984, EPA and WDNR perfonned aa preliminary assessment. The site was placed on theIn 1984, EPA and WDNR perfonned preliminary assessment. The site was placed on the National Priorities List (NPL) 1987. In January 1988, the Agency for Toxic Substances andNational Priorities List (NPL) 1987. In January 1988, the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) prepared aa preliminary health assessment for the site.Disease Registry (ATSDR) prepared preliminaiy health assessment for the site.

In August 1991, WDNR collected groundwater from three residential wells south of theIn August 1991, WDNR collected groundwater from tliree residential wells south of the Fairgrounds. The samples were analyzed for volatile organic compounds (VOCs). None wereFairgrounds. The samples were analyzed for volatile organic compounds (VOCs). None were detected.detected.

In February 1992, EPA sampled the three residential wells to confirm WDNR results. AnalysisIn February 1992, EPA sampled the three residential wells to confirm WDNR results. Analysis of the samples revealed no chemicals above state or federal standards.of the samples revealed no chemicals above state or federal standards.

Sampling of surface soils indicated the presence of heavy metals, including cadmium, chromium,Sampling of surface soils indicated the presence of heavy metals, including cadmium, chromium, lead, mercury, and selenium.lead, mercury, and selenium.

In 1993, the firstfirst phase of the Remedial Investigation (RI) began. The contaminants of concernIn 1993, the phase of the Remedial Investigation (RI) began. The contaminants of concern in groundwater were lead, cis-l,2-dichloroethene (cis-I, 22 DCE), and methylene chloride. AAin groundwater were lead, cis-l,2-dichloroethene (cis-1, DCE), and methylene chloride. second phase RI began in March 1995 and concluded in 1996.second phase RJ began in March 1995 and concluded in 1996.

Basis for Taking ActionBasis for Taking Action

The RI did not identify any significant human health risks at the site. EPA found that the buriedThe RI did not identify any significant human health risks at the site. EPA found that the buried waste at the capped landfill posed no significant risks under the current and reasonably­waste at the capped landfill posed no significant risks under the current and reasonably­anticipated future land uses at the site. The waste material was beneath aa covered surface andanticipated fiiture land uses at the site. The waste material was beneath covered surface and was inaccessible; thus, EPA concluded that there was little risk of exposure to hazardouswas inaccessible; thus, EPA concluded that there was little risk of exposure to hazardous substances. In addition, protection against inappropriate land use was already in place in thesubstances. In addition, protection against inappropriate land use was already in place in the form of aa city ordinance enforceable by WDNR.form of city ordinance enforceable by WDNR.

I I11

Although site groundwater did not meet the maximum contaminant levels (MCLs) under the SafeAlthough site groundwater did not meet the maximum contaminant levels (MCLs) under the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) for several VOCs, including the chemicals of concem (COCs),Drinking Water Act (SDWA) for several VOCs, including the chemicals of concern (COCs), vinyl chloride and methylene chloride, residents in the site area were connected to the municipalvinyl chloride and methylene chloride, residents in the site area were connected to the municipal water supply and were, therefore, not drinking contaminated water.water supply and were, therefore, not drinking contaminated water.

As aa result, EPA detelmined that it could select aa finalfinal remedy for the TFL site withoutAs result, EPA detennined that it could select remedy for the TFL site without completing aa feasibility study.completing feasibility study.

IV. Remedial ActionsIV. Remedial Actions

Remedy SelectionRemedy Selection

In 1996, EPA issued Record of Decision (ROD) selecting "No Further Action" (NFA) as theIn 1996, EPA issued aa Record of Decision (ROD) selecting "No Further Action" (NFA) as the TFL site remedy. This decision was based on the fact that no significant human health risks wereTFL site remedy. This decision was based on the fact that no significant human health risks were found under the cunent and reasonably anticipated future land use. Waste material at the sitefound under the cuirent and reasonably anticipated future land use. Waste material at the site was covered by several feet of soil and was il11ccessible. Although groundwater beneath the sitewas covered by several feet of soil and was inaccessible. Although groundwater beneath the site did notnot meet MCLs for vinyl chloride and methylene chloride, most residents in the area weredid meet MCLs for vinyl chloride and methylene chloride, most residents in the area were comiected to municipal water and there was no indication that groundwater contamination wouldconnected to municipal water and there was no indicatilon that groundwater contamination would move beyond the site. The ROD noted that selection of the NFA remedy relied on EPA'smove beyond the site. The ROD noted that selection of the NFA remedy relied on EPA's findingfinding that proprietary and governmental controls restricting land use were already in place and thatthat proprietary and govemmental controls re~tricting land use were already in place and that aa binding agreement had been reached between WDNR and the cit ' of Tomah requiring the city tobinding agreement had been reached between WDNR and the city of Tomah requiring the city to conduct periodic groundwater monitoring for ten years to ensure that groundwater conditions atconduct periodic groundwater monitoring for ten years to ensure that groundwater conditions at the site continued to pose no significant risk.the site continued to pose no significant risk.

Remedy ImplementationRemedy Implementation

The "No Further Action" remedy did not require any physical construction work to occur at theThe "No Further Action" remedy did not require any physical construction work to occur at the site. Under the consent order between the cit)' of Tomah and WDNR, however, the citysite. Under the consent order between the city of Tomah and WDNR, however, the city conducted its required periodic groundwater monitoring. Although groundwater samples takenconducted its required periodic groundwater monitoring. Although groundwater samples taken prior to selection of the remedy identified VOCs inside the landfill boundaries above theirprior to selection of the NFNFAA remedy identified VOCs inside the landfill boundaries above their MCLs, sampling conducted in August 2000 and April 2007 showed that groundwater on-site andMCLs, sampling conducted in August 2000 and April 2007 showed that groundwater on-site and downgradient now meets MCLs. Consequently, WDNR has proposed that the monitoring wellsdowngradient now meets MCLs. Consequently, WDNR has proposed that the monitoring wells at the site be properly abandoned.at the site be properly abandoned.

Institutional ControlsInstitutional Controls

Institutional controls (ICs) are required at the TFL site to ensure the protectiveness of theInstitutional controls (rCs) are required at the TFL site to ensure the protectiveness of the NFNFAA remedy. rcs are non-engineered instruments, such as administrative and/or legal controls, thatremedy. ICs are non-engineered instruments, such as administrative and/or legal controls, that help minimize the potential for exposure to contamination and protect the integrity of thehelp minimize the potential for exposure to contamination and protect the integrif/ of the remedy.remedy.

The ROD did not choose ICs as part of the NF A remedy because EPA had affirmed that effectiveThe ROD did not choose ICs as pat1 of the NFA remedy because EPA had affirmed that effective

1212

ICs were already in place: the city of Tomah had filed a deed restriction preventing residentialrcs were already in place: the city of Tomah had filed a deed restriction preventing residential use of Fairground property underlain by waste and had implemented an ordinance that prohibitsuse of Fairground property underlain by waste and had implemented an ordinance that prohibits pennits for well operation on the Fairgrounds propeity and within zone that extends 400 feetpennits for well operation on the Fairgrounds property and within aa zone that extends 400 feet beyond the northern boundary of the site. In addition, the was zoned C-1 Lowlandbeyond the northem boundary of the site. In addition, the sitesite was zoned C-l -- Lowland Resource Conservancy District, state designation that prohibits activities that could threatenResource Conservancy District, aa state designation that prohibits activities that could threaten natural resources. While the C-1 designation is not specifically designed to protect landfillnatural resources. While the C-l designation is not specifically designed to protect landfill caps,caps, the activities it prohibits include excavation, grading, tiling, etc., such that C-1 zoning providesthe activities it prohibits include excavation, grading, tiling, etc., such that C-l zoning provides an additional basis for concluding that buried waste will not be exposed in the future.an additional basis for concluding that buried waste will not be exposed in the future.

Continued protectiveness of the "No Further Action" remedy requires that rcs continue to beContinued protectiveness of the "No Further Action" remedy requires that ICs continue to be maintained. Specifically, ICs restricting activities that might expose waste underlying the sitemaintained. Specifically, rcs restricting activities that might expose waste underlying the site must be maintained in perpetuity. rcs that at the time of the ROD limited access to groundwatermust be maintained in perpetuity. ICs that at the time of the ROD limited access to groundwater are no longer necessary, given that sampling in 2000 and 2007 showed that groundwater meetsare no longer necessaiy, given that sampling in 2000 and 2007 showed that groundwater meets MCLs. But ICs prohibiting excavation, etc., continue to be needed.MCLs. But rcs prohibiting excavation, etc., continue to be needed.

Current Compliance: Based on inspections, monitoring data and interviews with city officials,Current Compliance: Based on inspections, monitoring data and interviews with city officials, there appears to be no inappropriate site and groundwater uses and there is no apparent violationthere appears to be no inappropriate site and groundwater uses and there is no apparent violation of the ICs.of the rcs. draft IC investigation/study submitted by the city demonstrates that the site hasAA draft rc investigation/study submitted by the city demonstrates that the site has both governmental and proprietary controls in place. These are sutmnarized in Table (below).both govemmental and proprietary controls in place. These are summarized in Table 22 (below).

Table 2: Institutional ControlsTable 2: Institutional Controls

Media, Engineered Controls, AreasMedia, Engineered Controls, &&Areas IC ObjectiveIC Objective Title of Institutional ControlTitle of Institutional Control that Do Not Support UU/UE Based onthat Do Not Support UUlUE Based on Instrument ImplementedInstrument Implemented Current Condi t ions.Current Conditions. GroundwaterGroundwater Groundwater wells shall notGroundwater wells shall not Deed Restriction May 9, 1996Deed Restriction -- May 9, 1996

be placed on site to preventbe placed on site to prevent (Under IC Study review)(Under IC Study review) interference with the remedyinterference with the remedy and to ensure noand to ensure no OrdinanceOrdinance inappropriate uses occur,inappropriate uses occur, such as drinking watersuch as aa drinking water source.source.

LandfillLandfill -­ Area where waste remains In placeArea where waste remains in place No interference with the cap,No interference with the cap, Deed Restriction May 9, 1996Deed Restriction -- May 9, 1996 and capped.and capped. i.e., no excavation (except fori.e., no excavation (except for

routine maintenance).routine maintenance). Zoning Restriction C-1 LowlandZoning Restriction -- C-1 Lowland Property cannot be used forProperty cannot be used for Resource Conservancy DistrictResource Conservancy District residential use.residential use.

Long-Term StewardshipLong-Term Stewardship

Long-teon protectiveness at the TFL site requires compliance with remedy and land-useLong-term protectiveness at the TFL site requires compliance with remedy and land-use restrictions to ensure that the remedy continues to function as intended. As noted , therestrictions to ensure that the remedy continues to function as intended. As noted aboveabove the long-term protectiveness of the "No Further Action" remedy requires compliance with ICs that10ng-teOll protectiveness of the "No Further Action" remedy requires compliance with res that restrict interference with the waste underlying the site. Planning for long term stewardshiprestrict interference with the waste underlying the site. Planning for long teon stewardship

1313

(LTS) of the ICs is therefore required. LTS involves putting effective procedures in place to(LTS) of the ICs is therefore required. LTS involves putting effective procedures in place to properly maintain and monitor the site and it includes defining the roles and responsibilities ofproperly maintain and monitor the site and it includes defining the roles and responsibilities of the parties along with the specific need for ICs to ensure that ICs remain in-place and arethe parties along with the specific need for ICs to ensui-e that ICs remain in-place and are effective in preventing exposure to residual contaminarion.effective in preventing exposure to residual contamination.

AA LTS plan would include regular inspection of ICs at the site and annual celtification to EPALTS plan would include regular inspection of ICs at the site and annual certification to EPA that rcs are in place and effective. WDNR has also placed aa notice in the WDNR GIS Registrythat ICs are in place and effective. WDNR has also placed notice in the WDNR GIS Registry in order to infonn parties interested in using or purchasing the propeliy of the conditions at thein order to infonn parties interested in using or purchasing the property of the conditions at the site, restrictions on its use, and the effects it may have on nearby properties.site, restrictions on its use, and the effects it may have on nearby properties.

The LIS plan is patt of the draft IC Study submitted by the city that is currently under review byThe LTS plan is part of the draft IC Study submitted by the city that is currently under review by EPEPAA and WDNR.and WDNR.

Follow-up ActionsFollow-up Actions

EPEPAA will direct the city to submit an Institutional Control Implementation and Assurance Planwill direct the city to submit an Institutional Control Implementation and Assurance Plan crCrAP), including aa work plan for any additional IC activity. The ICIAP will document existing(ICIAP), including work plan for any additional IC activity. The ICIAP will document existing ICs, conduct additional evaluation activities, and plan for implementing additional rcs if neededICs, conduct additional evaluation activities, and plan for implementing additional ICs if needed for long-tenn protectiveness.for long-tenn protectiveness.

Operation and Maintenance (O&M)Operation and Maintenance (O&M)

The selected remedial action for the TFL site was "'No Further Action" and it did not have anThe selected remedial action for the TFL site was "No Further Action" and it did not have an active O&M component. However, the city i~: inspecting and maintaining the landfill cover.active O&M component. However, the city is inspecting and maintaining the landfill cover.

V. Progress Since Last Five-Year Reviewv. Progress Since Last Five-Year Review

The previous FYR report found the "No Further Action" remedy selected in 1996 ROD to beThe previous FYR report found the "No Further Action" remedy selected in 1996 ROD to be protective of human health and the environment in the short term. The existing site use wasprotective of human health and the environment in the short term. The existing sil.e use was consistent with the objectives set f01ih in the ROD, and the institutional controls that pennittedconsistent with the objectives set forth in the ROD, and the institutional controls that permitted EPA to choose NFNFAA continued in effect. Long tenn protectiveness would require complianceEPA to choose continued in effect. Long tenn protectiveness would require compliance with land use restrictions that prohibit interference with the soil cap. Since groundwater has metwith land use restrictions that prohibit interference witli the soil cap. Since groundwater has met MCLs, assessment of the protectiveness of the CERCLA remedy no longer requires an appraisalMCLs, assessment of the protectiveness of the CERCLA remedy no longer requires an appraisal of ICs that prohibit the use of groundwater. Compliance with the rcs that prevent interferenceof ICs that prohibit the use of groundwater. Compliance with the ICs that prevent interference with the landfill cap would be accomplished by planning for long-tenn stewardship whichwith the landfill cap would be accomplished by planning for long-tenn stewardship which includes maintaining and monitoring effective ICs.includes maintaining and monitoring effective ICs.

This is the third FYR report for the TFL site. No further remedial actions or enforcement actionsThis is the third FYR report for the TFL site. No further remedial actions or enforcement actions have taken place since the initial FYR that EPA conducted in 2002. However, the previous FYRhave taken place since the initial FYR that EPA conducted in 2002. However, the previous FYR report identified several issues and provided recommendations to resolve those issues.report identified several issues and provided recommendations to resolve those issues.

Table (below) provides list of the issues and the actions taken to resolve the issues since theTable 33 (below) provides aa list of the issues and the actions taken to resolve the issues since the last FYR.last FYR.

1414

Table 3: Actions Taken Since the Last Five-Year ReviewTable 3: Actions Taken Since the Last Five-Year Review

Issues from Previousissues from Previous ReviewReview

AA review of ICs isreview of ICs is needed to ensure thatneeded to ensure that the remedy continuesthe remedy continues to function as intendedto function as intended (with regard to the ICs),(with regard to the ICs), including the evaluationincluding the evaluation of existing ICs andof existing ICs and ensuring that effectiveensuring that effective procedures are in-placeprocedures are in-place for long-termfor long-term stewardship of the ICs.stewardship of the ICs. Based upon the results ofBased upon the results of the IC evaluationthe IC evaluation activities, an IC Plan isactivities, an IC Plan is needed to addressneeded to address required follow-uprequired follow-up actions in order to ensureactions in order to ensure that the remedy remainsthat the remedy remains protective (includingprotective (including planning for 10ng-tell11planning for long-teim

Recommendations! Party Milestone Follow-up Actions Responsible Date Recommendations/ Party Milestone Follow-up Actions Responsible Date

IC evaluationIC evaluation activities will beactivities will be undertakenundertaken

Prepare anPrepare an IICC

Plan*Plan*

March TomahTomah 2008 City ofCity of March

2008

City ofCity of MarchMarch TomahTomah 20082008

Action Taken andAction Taken and OutcomeOutcome

is reviewingEPEPAA is reviewing the draft IC Planthe draft IC Plan that the citythat the city submitted insubmitted in April 2012.April 2012.

EPA is reviewingEPA is reviewing the draft IC Planthe draft IC Plan that the citythat the city submitted insubmitted in April 2012.April 2012.

Date ofDate of ActionAction

Not yetNot yet completed.completed.

Not yetNot yet completed.completed.

stewardship).1 stewardship). |

*The IC plan will include aa provislon for developing an IC map, evaluating whether effective ICs*The IC plan will include provision for developing an IC map, evaluating whether effective ICs continue to be implemented, ensuring that effective procedures are in place to regularly inspectcontinue to be implemented, ensuring that effective procedures are in place to regularly inspect ICs at the site, providing an annual celiification to EPA that ICs are in place and effective, andICs at the site, providing an annual certification to EPA that ICs are in place and effective, and for development of communications plan. The IC plan should be developed within months.for development of aa communications plan. The IC plan should be developed within 66 months. The schedule for the of the actions will be detennined in the IC plan.The schedule for the remainderremainder of the actions will be detenllined in the IC plan.

VI. Five Year Review ProcessVI. Five Year Review Process

Administrative ComponentsAdministrative Components

The TFL site FYR waswas conducted by David Linnear, EPA's remedial project manager (RPM)The TFL site FYR conducted by David Linnear, EPA's remedial project manager (RPM) assigned to the site. WDNR waswas notified of the start of the third FYR process by letter in 2011.assigned to the site. WDNR notified of the start of the third FYR process by letter in 2011.

From September 2011 to June 2012, the RPM reviewed site documents and groundwater data,From September 2011 to June 2012, the RPM reviewed site documents and groundwater data, inspected the site, and developed this third FYR report.inspected the site, and developed this third FYR report.

Community Notification and InvolvementCommunity Notification and Involvement

EPA notified the community of the start of the third FYR process at the TFL site in March 2012EPA notified the community of the start of the third FYR process at the TFL site in March 2012 1515

EPA received noby placing an adveitisement in the Tomah Journal (see Attachments).by placing an adveriisement in the Tomah Journal (see Attachments). EPA received no comments or concerns from the public about the FYR. The Agency also checked with the cit)' toconunents or concerns from the public about the FYR. The Agency also checked with the city to see if there had been any public inquiries made about the FYR process and the city reported thatsee if there had been any public inquiries made about the FYR process and the city reported that it had received no public comments regarding the site FYR.it had received no public comments regarding the site FYR.

EPA will place the completed FYR report and background data into the site infonnationEPA will place the completed FYR report and background data into the site infonnation repository located at the Tomah Public Library, 716 Superior Ave., and on EPA's website.repositor)' located at the Tomah Public Libraiy, 716 Superior Ave., and on EPA's website.

Documents ReviewedDocuments Reviewed

EPA reviewed TLF site documents in preparation of this FYR report, which incl ude theEPA reviewed TLF site documents in preparation of this FYR report, which include the following: 1996 ROD, 2002 FYR Report, 2007 and drinking water well samplingfollowing: 1996 ROD, 2002 FYR Report, 2007 groundwatergroundwater and drinking water well sampling activities report, 2007 FYR Report, 2011 residential drinking water wells report, and the TLF siteactivities report, 2007 FYR Report, 2011 residential drinking water wells report, and the TLF site conespondencecorrespondence file.file.

Data ReviewedData Reviewed

After reviewing the 2007 groundwater sampling data report and the 2011 residential drinkingAfter reviewing the 2007 groundwater sampling data report and the 2011 residential drinking water wells report, EPA concludes that the TFL site remedy as required by the 1996 RODwater wells report, EPA concludes that the TFL site remedy as required by the 1996 ROD remains protective. Although the COCs are detectable in groundwater beneath the site, they areremains protective. Although the COCs are detectable in groundwater beneath the site, they are found at levels below MCLs.found at levels below MCLs.

Site InspectionSite Inspection

The site inspection was conducted Februaiy 28, 2012. David Linnear, EPA RPM, conducted theThe site inspection was conducted February 28, 2012. David Linnear, EPA RPM" conducted the inspection with Erin Endsley, WDNR, and with elected officials and staff of the city of Tomah.inspection with Erin Endsley, WDNR, and with elected officials and staff of the city of Tomah. Upon inspection, EPA that the groundwater monitoring wells were in place and the siteUpon inspection, EPA findsfinds that the groundwater monitoring wells were in place and the site landfill cover is intact.landfill cover is intact.

VII.VII. Technical AssessmentTechnical Assessment

Question A: Is the remedy functioning as intended by the decision document?Question A: Is the remedy functioning as intended by the decision document?

Answer A: Yes.Answer A: Yes.

The basis for the "No Further Action" remedy selected in the 1996 ROD continues to apply toThe basis for the "No Further Action" remedy selected in the 1996 ROD continues to apply to the TFL site.the TFL site.

No site activities have been observed that would vioIa-:e the land-use restrictions on which theNo site activities have been observed that would viola:e the land-use restrictions on which the ROD was predicated.ROD was predicated.

The remedy is functioning as intended. restrictive covenant is in place that prohibitsThe remedy is functioning as intended. AA restrictive covenant is in place that prohibits interference with the landfill cap; groundwater restriction ordinance is currently in placeinterference with the landfill cap; aa groundwater restri,:::tion ordinance is currently in place

1616

(although groundwater monitoring results indicate that groundwater restrictions are no longer(although groundwater monitoring results indicate that groundwater restrictions are no longer necessary); and the zoning for the site - C-l Lowland Resource Conservancy District - pennitsnecessary); and the zoning for the site - C-1 Lowland Resource Conservancy District - pennits use of the site as the Fairgrounds parking lot, but prohibits filling, flooding, draining, dredging,use of the site as the Fairgrounds parking lot, but prohibits filling, flooding, draining, dredging, ditching, tiling or excavation on the site. Based on inspections, monitoring, interviews with cityditching, tiling or excavation on the site. Based on inspections, monitoring, interviews with city officials, and aa review of aa draft IC study submitted by the city, there appears to be complianceofficials, and review of draft IC study submitted by the city, there appears to be compliance with the land and groundwater use restrictions. Long-tenn protectiveness requires compliancewith the land and groundwater use restrictions. Long-term protectiveness requires compliance with land use restrictions that prohibit interference with the soil cap and restrict the site to thewith land use restrictions that prohibit interference with the soil cap and restrict the site to the uses allowed under the C-l zoning designation. Compliance with ICs will be accomplished byuses allowed under the C-1 zoning designation. Compliance with ICs will be accomplished by the city of Tomah undertaking long-teml stewardship, including maintaining, monitoring and enforcing effectiveenforcing effective ICs.rcs. draft IC plan has been developed to monitor the effectiveness of the the city of Tomah undertaking long-term stewardship, including maintaining, monitoring and

AA draft IC plan has been developed to monitor the effectiveness of the existing restrictions so that the no action remedy continues to be protective.existing restrictions so that the no action remedy continues to be protective.

Question B: Are the exposure assumptions, toxicity data, cleanup levels, and remedialQuestion B: Are the exposure assumptions, toxicity data, cleanup levels, and remedial action objectives (RAOs) used at the time of the remedy selection still valid?action objectives (RAOs) used at the time of the remedy selection still valid?

Yes.AnswerAnswer B:B: Yes.

At the time of the remedy selection, exposure assumptions were based on the site's use as aaAt the time of the remedy selection, exposure assumptions were based on the site's use as parking lot for the Fairgrounds, with no excavation, filling,filling, etc. permitted. That continues to beparking lot for the Fairgrounds, with no excavation, etc. permitted. That continues to be the case.the case.

There have been no changes in the physical conditions at the site that could affect theThere have been no changes in the physical conditions at the site that could affect the protectiveness of the remedy because the city has regularly maintained the TLF site.protectiveness of the remedy because the city has regularly maintained the TLF site.

Changes in Standards and Things to be Considered (TBCs)Changes in Standards and Things to be Considered (TBCs)

There have been no changes in promulgated cleanup standards or TBCs that would affect theThere have been no changes in promulgated cleanup standards or TBCs that would affect the protectiveness of the remedy.protectiveness of the remedy.

Changes in Exposure Pathways. Toxicitv, and Other Contaminant CharacteristicsChanges in Exposure Pathways. Toxicity, and Other Contaminant Characteristics

There has been no change in exposure pathways or toxicity values or other contaminantThere has been no change in exposure pathways or toxicity values or other contaminant characteristics that could affect the protectiveness of the remedy. Groundwater contaminationcharacteristics that could affect the protectiveness of the remedy. Groundwater contamination concentrations have declined and site groundwater meets MCLs.concentrations have declined and site groundwater meets MCLs.

Question C: Has any other information come to light that could call into question theQuestion C: Has any other information come to light that could call into question the protectiveness of the remedy?protectiveness of the remedy?

Answer C: No.Answer C: No.

There is no other information that calls into question the protectiveness of the remedy.There is no other infomlation that calls into question the protectiveness of the remedy.

1717

Technical Assessment SummaryTechnical Assessment Summary

After evaluating the 2011 residential drinking well sampling data during this FYR, EPAAfter evaluating the 2011 residential drinking \vell sampling data during this FYR, EPA concludes that the NFA remedy required by the 1996 ROD remains protective. There have beenconcludes that the NFA remedy required by the 1996 ROD remains protective. There have been no changes in the physical conditions of the site that v/ould affect the protectiveness of theno changes in the physical conditions of the site that would affect the protectiveness of the remedy. There is no other infonnation available that calls into question the protectiveness of theremedy. There is no other infonnation available that ealls into question the protectiveness of the remedy.remedy.

VIII. IssuesVIII. Issues

Table 44 (below) sUlmnarizes minor issues that EPA compiled for the site.Table (below) suimnarizes minor issues that EPA compiled for the site.

Table 4: IssuesTable 4: Issues

Affects CurrentAffects Current Affects FutureAffects Future IssuesIssues ProtectivenessProtectiveness ProtectivenessProtectiveness

(Y/N)(YIN) (Y/N)(YIN)

Effective ICs must be monitored, maintained, andEffective rcs must be monitored, maintained, and NN YY

enforced; long-tenn stewardship procedures should bebeenforced; long-tenn stewardship procedures should prepared.prepared.

Waste remains in place, but long-tenn cover maintenancetenanceWaste remains in place, but aa long-tenn cover main NN YY

plan is lacking.plan is lacking.

Unused groundwater monitoring wells should be properlyoperlyUnused groundwater monitoring wells should be pr NN YY

abandoned per WAC Ch. NR 141.abandoned per WAC Ch. NR 141.

IX. Recommendations and Follow-Up ActionsIX. Recommendations and Follow-Up Actions

The city of Tomah has submitted aa draft ICIAP to EPA and WDNR that includes the IC StudyThe city of Tomah has submitted draft ICIAP to EPA and WDNR that includes the IC Study results and aa work plan to propose and take additional steps, as needed, to ensure that effectiveresults and work plan to propose and take additional steps, as needed, to ensure that effective rcs are monitored, maintained, and enforced at the TFL site. The rCIAP should provide for long­ICs are monitored, maintained, and enforced at the TFL site. The ICIAP should provide for long­term stewardship of site ICs.ternl stewardship of site rcs.

The city should develop WDNR-approved cover maintenance plan which details its proposedThe city should develop aa WDNR-approved cover maintenance plan which details its proposed activities to comply with the state's closed landfill requirements.activities to comply with the state's closed landfill requirements.

The city should develop and execute aa groundwater well abandonment plan for existingThe city should develop and execute groundwater well abandonment plan for existing monitoring wells that are no longer needed to monitor groundwater quality at the site. Themonitoring wells that are no longer needed to monitor groundwater quality at the site. The abandomnent plan shall comply with WAC Ch. NR 141.abandonment plan shall comply with WAC eh. NR 141.

Table (next page) provides summaiy of the recommendations and follow-up actions needed atTable 55 (next page) provides aa summary of the recommendations and follow-up actions needed at the TFL site.the TFL site.

18

Table 5: Recommendations and Follow-up ActionsTable 5: Recommendations and Follow-up Actions

AffectsAffects ProtectivenessIssue ProtectivenessIssue RecommendationsRecommendations Milestone (YIN)Oversight (Y/N)PartyParty Oversight Milestone

andand Responsible Agency DateResponsible Agency DateFollow-up ActionsFollow-up Actions

CurrentCurrent FutureFuture

review of site ICs is needed to assure that the remedy continues to function as intended and to

1 ensure that effective

AA review of site ICs is needed to assure that the remedy continues to function as intended and to ensure that effective

EPA and WDNR are the draft IC Study/ Investigation submitted in April 2012. Once

EPA and WDNR are reviewingreviewing the draft IC Study/ Investigation submitted in April 2012. Once

City of Tomah City of Tomah

EPAEPA September 2013 September 2013

NN YY

procedures are in­place for long-tenn stewardship at the site.

procedures are in­place for long-tenn stewardship at the site.

completed, it will be approved or an ICIAP will be required for additional work.

completed, it will be approved or an ICIAP will be required for additional work.

Waste remains in place, but long-term

1 cover maintenance plan is lacking.

Waste remains in place, but aa long-tenn cover maintenance plan is lacking.

Develop WDNR­approved cover maintenance plan.

Develop WDNR­approved cover maintenance plan.

City of Tomah City of Tomah

WDNRWDNR September 2013 September 2013

NN YY

Unused groundwater monitoring wellsshould be abandoned

Unused groundwater monitoring wells should be abandoned

' Plan and then conduct well abandonment in

Plan and then conduct well abandolIDlent in

City of TomahCity of Tomah '

WDNRWDNR September 2013 September 2013

NN YY

per WAC Ch. NR | l41 . per WAC Ch. NR 141.

accordance with WACCh.NRHl . accordance with WAC Ch. NR 141.

X. Protectiveness Statementx. Protectiveness Statement

The remedy is protective of human health and the enviromnent because the landfill capThe NFNFAA remedy is protective of human health and the environment because the landfill cap prevents contact with buried waste, groundwater beneath the site meets groundwater cleanupprevents contact with buried waste, groundwater beneath the site meets groundwater cleanup goals, and exposures are occurring. Long-term protectiveness of the NFA remedy will begoals, and exposures are notnot occurring. Long-tenn protectiveness of the NFA remedy will be ensured through continued compliance with land-use restrictions that prohibit interference withensured through continued compliance with land-use restrictions that prohibit interference with the existing soil cap. The city of Tomah recently submitted an IC Study wherein it committedthe existing soil cap. The city of Tomah recently submitted an IC Study wherein it committed itself to long-term stewardship of the TFL site, including maintaining, monitoring, and enforcingitself to long-tenn stewardship of the TFL site, including maintaining, monitoring, and enforcing effective ICs.effective ICs.

1919

1

1

1

XI. Next ReviewXI. Next Review

EPA will complete the next FYR of the TFL site within years from the date of this FYREPA will complete the next FYR of the TFL site within fivefive years from the date of this FYR report.report.

2020

FIGURESFIGURES

2121

Tomah Fairgrounds Superfund SiteTomah Fairgrounds Superfund Site Monroe County, WisconsinMonroe County, Wisconsin

1) state I11) State

2) City of Tomah 12) City of Tomah I

Williams St ~' / /Townline Rd

I o w a

3) Tomah Fairgrounds Superfund Site 13) Tomah Fairgrounds Superfund Site I

F ^

Lake Tomah m drcIeJSf:

-Wt/lonc -St"

\L i H ^ ^ WJoneairSt­

" ^ :c W'CgufTcirSf

„^LU

~Stoughton-Av.e !--.,..o o-c-CORCrCrrr ^W'Eiizaisetirsr

._L —ScttallsrSf

ViiS2r

by DMM VMm lUmMHaon MIMOI I........IIrDllillllWllan u.&1!M.....-I Figure 1 «EPAsr=:. RIFigure 11

Tomah Farigrounds Superfund Site Tomah Farigrounds Superfund Site 3D Surface Tenrain Model 3D Surface Terrain Model

Legend

Elevation Feet 01398 -1455

E2J 1342 - 1398 _1285 -1342

_1229 -1285 1172 -1229 1116-1172

_1059 -1116

01003 -1059

0947 -1003

IPIal.......,.......u... IPA............. I Figure 2 w -- - .j^mmm IFigure 2 1

ATTACHMENTSATTACHMENTS

2222

THURSDAY, Match 15, 2012 87THURSDAY. Mardi 15. 2012 B7Classified ads 785-SELL (loll free en·785-7355) Other business 608-782-9710Classified ads 785-StELL (toll free 677-785-7355) Other business 608-782-9710tomah;oumal comlomahjoumal com

WHArs INSIDEWHAFS INSIDE _Jobs

TIiE TOMAH JOURNAL • Jobs I WheelsETOMAH JOURNAL • Homes• HomesCLASSIFIEDS __IsCbASSlflEDS • And More ...• And More...

tomahjournal.com . 608-785-7355 orTo!l Free 877-785-7355.tomollioumal.com

EPA Begins Review of TomahEPA Begins Review of Tomah Fairgrounds Landfi l l SiteFairgrounds Landfill Site

Tomah, WisconsinTomah. WIICOf'lU'I

U.S. Environmental Prolection Agenc>' is conductingu.s. ElMronmentol Protoctioo AaeIlCl' is cooduding a (h'e-year re^new of the Tomah Fairgrounds Landfill.1lI'e·yeor ,..,...0/ t!>e T_ril'l_ LandliU Superfund site located one mile south of LakeSuperfund sile Ioated one mi'e south of Late Tomah in Tomah. The Superfund law requires regularTomab in Tomah.. The Superfund law requires regular checkups of sites that have been cleaned up - w t hcbectups of sites that have been clta(led up -'nidi \vaste managed on-site - to make. sore the cleanup.."iSle managed on·site - to make sure the cleanup

continues to protect people and the environment Thiscontinues to protect peop(e and the environment This is the third A'e-year re\iew of this site.is tilt third moe-year Tt\;ew of this site..

EPA's cleanup plan monitors groundivater for volatileEP~s deanup plan monitors groundwater (or YOlatile organic compounds, makes sure that contaminationorganic compounds, makes sure lbal contamination naturally degrades, and places deed and accessnaturally degrades, and pIKes deed and ilea" restrictions on the property-. EPA will e\'aluate whetherrestrictions on the property. EPA will e\'3luale whether these controls are working and will investigate thethese controls aTe waltlns and will investigate the remaining on-site vds le . The site is an openremainins on-site "''asle. The site is an open fieldfield except when used as a parking lot during fairgroundexcept when used as aparldnslot during fairground events.t\'ents.

More information is available at the Tomah PubhcMore information is Mila~e at the Tomah Public library, 716 Superior Ave. and at ivww.epa.gov/region5/Library, 116 Superior•. and al www.epa.go¥lrtRitm' cleanup'iomahfair. The re\iew should be completed inc1tanupAornllhlair. Tht rt\;ew should be completed in June 2012.Juoe2012.

The five-year review is an opportunity to tell EPA aboutThe five..year reYiew is an opportunity to lell EPA about site conditions and any concerns you have. Contact:site conditions and Inyconcems)'Otl ~. Contact:

hb'kiaPatricia KiauseKnue David Linnear0.,14 Uuear Communit)' Remedial Prajecl ManagerCo:lL1luaity Re:....PrOJld ..twre:r ~tCoordialtorInwh'ement Coordinator 3t3-i!6£-ie41312_1&() 312-W-1iOI312-886-9506 liniwar.(lnid@epa.gov........... hrause.patridaS'epiLgw,,~

Ymi mi) (all EPA loll-frw al MO-ai-M31.8JO »jn. 10 «£• fiiri. wwtdiw.Ya.~alm.III-l,. .. -.cI.JOI,tJI.....Up..a.~

EPA XesionUAlerioa 55 7 7 W. JacksoK Bhd .17 If. JoKbH ItrL C h i u s o , IL 60604Qlcap, n iM04

^L^a isAo I greatbank. . .great bank... '

STATE OF WISCONSIN CIRCUIT COURT

MONROE COUNTY NOnCE TO CREOfTOnS

(INFORMAL ADUINISTTIATION) CASE HO. 12Pft 2 *

IN THE MATTER OF 7WE ESTATE OF EL1KOR L. GDFF

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE: 1. An application lor jnlormal a<kn

tstral Km was men. Z The deceden, with dale of On

Augusl 12, 19% and dale ol dea Febnjaiy 23, 2012 was ctomiciled Uoruoe County, State ol Wiscon! with a m a l ^ address ol 210 We Logan Stiaal, Tomah, Wisconi 546E0. 3. All inlerested persons waived n

lice. 4. The deadline lor tibng a claim

aoaiRst Ihe decedent's estate June iB .201Z

5. A da lm may t>e liled at the Mon­toe Cour<y Courthouse. Sparta, Wls-

P i o t M a Hagisttai M a n i ) S . 2 0 l 2 Afkxney Robert J. Mubarak UtAa iak . RadcHe A Satty, a c . 917 Supsrtot A w r w t T o m a h , W t e o n s i n 5 4 6 6 0 ^ ) 1 1 0 eoa -372-2014 Bar Number 1015199 3/15,22,99 3 0 0 6 8 8 6 1 WNAXLP

STATE OF WISCONSIN c iRcun-COURT

LA C R O S S E COUNTY AMENDED SUMMONS

31001 Claim Under DoHat L imi t Case No. 12-SC-1S7

SPRINGLEAF FINANCIAL SERVICES OF Wl INC. Plaint itl

X F F R E Y C. FROST 2207 County HWY O W a r r e n s . VA 54666 " i ' •

II YOU

SPHIKfGLEAF FINANCIAL SER­VICES OF Wl INC., plaimin above lurned in the srrkal dainiG ctxirt lor Lacrosse Coifity, Wl n t i e l a ­crosse Courtty Courthouse. IntMe Court, kicaMd M 333 Vine Straat, LaCrossa, Wl 54601 , phone 60e'7S5-S5U. A bearing w l be h M nnUaWTM 3 i » i w i t ^ • a-nr, u n . F YOU DO NOT APPEAR. A JUtXHIBTT MAY BE ENTERED AGAINST VOU BY THE PLAINTIFF H E R E I N . A copy

Dated IMt 6 t i Oay of March, 2012.

VVauS3u,WI 54401 Ph . 715(842-0388 3 /15 3 0 0 6 8 4 6 0 WNAXLP

STATE OF WISCONSIN C IRCUn-COURT

MONROE COUNTY NOTlCe TO CREDTTORS

(INFORMAL ADMINISTRATK>N) CASENO.2012-PB-1B

IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF

MILES S. SCHHOEOER PLEASE TAKE NOTICE; 1. An applcat ionlor nloitrtal aortim­

islialion was fUeO. 2. The deixOer*, with dale ol birth

May 7, 1934 and date ol death Jan­oa«y 8, 70 IZ was Oomiolea in Morv loe County, Slate ol Wncon i i n w i n

HaVLoSBlEAn

UEETING NOTICE TOWN OF LA GHAHGE

Nol-ce is ricieby given thai on Mon-Oay. MarOi 1 ^ , 3012 tne Town ot La Grange w9 oondixj its legulai monlhl/ meeling i l 7;30 p.m. in Ihe Town Hal.

STATE OF WISCONSIN CIRCUIT COURT

l *ONnOE COUNTY N O T K E AND ORDER FOR NAME CHANGE HEARING

CASE NO. 12CV71 In Itw manef ol the nama change

of Demdt Dwane Hotjert Lincoln By pelf l ioner) D o m d i Dwane Robon Lincoln NOTICE IS GIVEN:

an: benict i Dwane Robeit

To: DenicK Dwana-Roben R>ebe BiMh Ceitil icale: Defnck Owane

B o * « r t l J n « * i r r IS ORDERED: This peinion tviU t>e heard in tne Or­

cuil Court oi Monroe Count/, Slate ol WiBConsn: JiMge's Narrw Todd L Z«gief Place Monioa County Courthouse I I Z S o . Court Street Sparta. Wl ^4656 Dale A(iril 1 1 , ? 0 t ; T i m e t 0:00 a m . BY THE COURT: IsnoOa L Ziegler

dal iors due lo • disaUWy to panid­pate In Ihe court piocess, please call 6aB-2e&474B Bl lessl len (10} " ing days prior — ~ •—•-.•—•

REQUEST K ) R B O S TOWN OF BYRON

The Town 0< Byton a accepting bids on iDid maMenance malsnak,

4( ' Ume RocK Gravel, Breaker Run, LvnBElana Chips, Rip Rap and Seal Coal SuffadnB unl l April Glh, 2012.

Please man M s to: Chairman Al BamhardL 12850 County Hwy. N, Tomah, WL S4660. For any ques­tions can Chairman Al Bernhardt ­60B-372-7[Ma Tlie Town Board reserves the r i ^ l

to ra|ec1 any and a l bids oi to accspt t l u l bid deemed most aiS'anlageous lo the iovir\. TOWN OF BVRON AHen Bernhaidl, Chaimian 3J8,1S 30066887 WHAXLP

great employer!great employer! Full or Part-tine Teller posiliori available.

E);p!rience beneficial; however, a

wlllingnesao learn and friendly

personality ate required. Salaiy based on

expeiience. Stop in and ask for an TiMBERWaob appiialion at the reception desk or caU BANKV'ff Jane at 374-1131 to have an application

mailed tC' you. Timbeiwood Bank is an iot-in-mi

Equal Opportunity'Employer. P . a B n t S K . I o i r u K M M i M

POSITIONSW^eca AVAILABLE U e c a S p o r t s w e a r , Inc . is l o o k i n g for fu l l - t ime e m b i o O e r y

macnine operators tor Isl & 2nd shift. Attention to detail is a must! Computer experience, Itie ability to measure, and follow

written directions are necessary. Quality is most importarrt!

Meca Sportswear offers a competitive wage and benefits package inciuding medical, dental, short tenn disability, holiday

and vai^lion pay, 401 k anil proftl shanng.

M e c a S p o r t s w e a r 1120 Tov/nline fload, Tomah

8:00-3:00 Monday Through Friday - ^ _

Robcni Trrigaiion Compao)' lofc. Plover, Wincnnsin Thi; leaner in Agriculture aiui CttiJberrr Irrigation Induurr oflcrir^

u la , custom daign. pafts, iiutallation, and repair len'ices, due

drivcQ ojDide Sale) Represcnutrve to pew our Ctanbetiv Silci

accounti. ouruguig projtcu. bjildii^ new acfouan, iiurugittg ulis. iniuUitiiiii nrHiiuu mil ind innivtuic mniiiuiHng lyiTL-cu. RRIIIIIC iiroiig wiittcn SIKI veilal uunmuiiicatiaiu ikilij. A gnod drrvii^ record required, vrt offer a (ocipaiiive ulary, company

Afhjcie m i companv betKilt pidc^e. Enail Cmtr letter anJ renatie:

Attn: DatT Zywicki, Gcnenl Manager d j y w i c k i ^ r o b c r t s fr r i ga t j on . net

H E L P WANTED i p 3 h The Tomah Area School Dislrict .• The Tomah Area School District ^ ^ '

Town of By ton Spr ing Elect ion The lown d Byton win hold a Spring

Elaction on AprI 3.2012 i t »<e Town hal from 7 a/m. lo B p.m. School boanJ and! other races will

STATE OF WISCONSIN

cmcurrCOURT MONROE COUNTY

NOTICE OF SHERIFFS SALE CASE NO.: 11CV321

CODE NO.: 3 I»04 AMOUNT CLAIMED IS

GREATER THAN 110,000.00 TIUBEHWOOD BANK 110 West Veterans Slieet Tomah, vyisconsin S « 6 0 ,

SHAHI L W 0 J N A R 0 V « K 1 llWa SHARI L FORD and THOMAS WOJNAROWSKI 1717 Md-ean Avenue Tomah, Wtaconsin 54660, AND CITY O F TOUftH, AdBW throug

IE!SL>9ai5*U

BLOCK GRANT B19Superic< Avenue Tomah, Wisconsin 54660 , DelenOanl*. By vulue o( and pursuani to a Judg­

menl ol Foteclosure enlered in Ihe •boue'entltled action on Seplemtter 27, 2011, I w« sd l at pubhc auction in t lw loUiy of t te Monroe County Counhouse, in the C«y of Sparta, in

•County. -

One (11 and Two |2), Block 13) al Howart f i Subdrvision to

Tomah. Wonroe County.

T^RMS OF SALE: Cash DOWI« PAYMENT; 10% ol amount

bid by cenil«cl check Dated al Sparta, Wisconsin, this ts t

dayol Febniaiy, 2012. /a iPeter H, Oiwin Pe le r Our<n, StienB Monroe County, Wisconsjn MUBARAK, R A C C L I F F E & BERRY,

S.C. Attorney FUchard A Haddifle

REGIONAL RECRUITER OPPORTUNITY

QPS Employment Group has an internal

opening for a REGIONAL RECRUITER lo

recru i t interview, screen, select and

p lace candidates at our client companies.

W e a re looking for an independent worke r vv^o

can handle a fast pace environment to recruit

f rom our satellite offices in:

M a u s t o n (1 dayAt\^}

Torriah (1 day/wk)

Baraboo(2days/wk} Richland Center off ice on Fridays.

If you are interested in this opportunity and feel you would be a

fit please contact Heather Notbohm [h nDtbohm@qpsemp[oyme nLcom]

for more details.

www.qpsemployment.com

lft«-:C'® TRUCK DRIVER WANTEDTRUCK DRIVER WANTED Band Box Cleaners Laundry, leader inBand Box Cleaners && Laundry, aa leader in

the industry for over 50 years.OJ. Industry for over ~ yeatS.

Full Part-Time Drivers V/anted. Must have CDLFuI && p.,r·Tme D'i\oets V/anted. Must he.-. COL We offer a full range of benefits;We ofta". full range of benefits;

healtti dental insurance,he81th && dental insurance. I 401 K. hfe insurwoe, paJCI vacations && hoIidIys.401K. life insurance, paid vacations holidays.

L B a n d B o x C l e a r t e r s & L a u n d r y , I n c 1 2 0 7 - 2 3 S u p e r i o r A v e

cic-JOi? P.O. Box299 Tomah. Wl 54660 60B-372-5642 or 800-362-3303

\ \ M m \ . » 3 ^ > U \

SI7Super iorn Avenue PoBi OHice Box 110 T o n « Wisconsin S4«e0-0t10 Telephone : e O S - 3 7 2 - 2 0 U Facsimile: 608-372-2447 The above property a bested al

1717 UcLaan Awnue, Toman, W i consn 30060311 2/9,16,23,S'1,8,15 WNAXLP

TRUCK DRIVERS Now hinng lo< Caltle (tocal and OTR) A Frer t i l (re^onaD- ApcJv onfirat: VMwJrsIamuxom or call

608-374-2000

A L E R T Be cau t ious . D o rvtl s e n d clieck, money oider a olhi

iheir cteiJitHlrty. N you r ecen t a ctiecK. BSK T banli lo pioc­ess Ihe check or olhenvise ver­t f lis aulhenliclty tielore you relv on those lunds to send

I party indud­

.. _ _,_,.__ _ lo bo : liaudulent, liegal at lor

9 » lei

uMd i make them appear l e ^ l mate. As always. Ihe ultimal rcsponsibAity \ i with Die cor sumef lo use caution wtien er lei ing into any financial Itans

II you have contact with an ao eitiser in out puhlications Ihs eems quesl ionable. pleaE< ontact us immediaiely.

Hiver Valley Newspaper Group 606-791-8343 or 677-785-7355

Do you ike lo be ou ls idsand worlong w A mechinBry?

Hawk High Dai ty - N s i m l k has an oowrtutiffiy tot a positive and retobla peison lo us i s t with

l iaOor/general larm equipntonl

S e e s o n a l Iwlp n t m l M l o n l o c a l d a n b a r r v U a r s h . MuEt b s IS4­

yiE. old. Competitive wages , s a l e wortung coridilions. 808-378-4385.

CUSTOM harves ie i seeks experi­enced operator lor newer JD/Case IH equipmenL Also Semi Tnx:k Driver needed C a l 606-343-7865.

FiUCatwionl* GArftfleSal«3

USED BOOK SALE: Sal., Mar. 17, Bsm-apm S S j n 18, l ^ p m . eag sale SS a re S i n only. Houston Co. hi5lr>ncal Society. Hew Location 104 H1SI07 Ln. [East Mai l} , Caledonia, M K 607-725-3884. hchsaacegiQiip.ric

Tieys I I B 9 Basement | | K I M Home Service

• BANKRUPTCY• Basement HOME REPAIRFree ca jnsu l ta l i on & tee q u o l i R i c h a r d H. D a t t y , A T T O R N E Y

L i t w i s e d in M N 8. W l . INTEMOR AWet? Over 40 yrs. e iper . Pertor^ally

handled 6OO0 . rases since EXTERIOR

19B7. kutani electronic Mng. • SlftlD • il/Bors Scenic C« i te r Bu i ld ing - Free E t l i r n o h s • RMling • ftwn&nj€

11S 5th Ave. So. S u n * 4 lB , • S^Hffiiclion giL^a-. • uietts Cit i img • DrfxatLa C r o n e , W l (608) 796-0031 • Wrttttn IS-yatr w

Tol l Free 1 -BW^2-O031 • l i m P j iw ig P j c A h j BipeiiiKcm I Know Hon Am • Handcv • ftwAesBEnVER

• Wlntbws • Pouer U / s s t b y . \A/I

s o s - C 3 ^ — 4 a a o We prepare a n d

Campe) Bopalr l | | 2 i s Cl!>anin3 House clean o ik properties " OtIieaEfuMr for re-sale!

E M Auto Tru* I

LVDEN jorra BODY XKC. HANDYMAN

EXPERT BOOy i MWT WORK fSERWICES AIJTO FMSHES

roSEIGN I OOUEsnc COLUSBH K H P

ICEHTWEDTECHNICUMS

Toll Free: t-tOII-27B-eO90 I Ml lUS GIASS REPUCEUtVT iHiiw.ste3niawavcleanina.coni R w l l.>iii*n. Owner

I^JSaj is accepting appIicLilioas for: aS£%• is accepting applicaLioos for. ',..... II ~===::"";::':':~.J II Substitute Bus and Van DriversSubstitute Bus and Van Drh'ers

The Toinah .Ajea School Districi will traio you to acquire theThe TClm8h Ala School Distria ..iD tr.IlD )'01110 KqUire the appropriate liccmc and cijdorscmcDis for tws driving. AM or.pproprulle liceo5e 80d codorscma:llS for bus drn-ioc. AM 01 PM bus routes are a^-ailable and average approjumately i/4PM bw routes Il't nailablt. wi l\va~e apprOlimattly 11 114 -2hou i spe r rou l e , Bus route pay averages bclweeo S25-S37 per route. Van routes run at various times during ihe day, \'an;;=.~=.es~~a:~,:~=c:=;e:.e s;; ~~ 11~~:l:!~=;;;;:'=~1 ~ routes arc paid by the hour. Substitute drivers arc called on anfOUlCJ art paid by the bour. Subctitule drn'etS 8I"e caDed 00 IlD as Deeded basis.as oeededbasiL

Menaod womeaofall walksof life have found a joy in panici­paiing ID th)^ sector of the sluUenl'K education proci;ss. If youMe:D8Dd~Qr.uu.'&IboflireU\"e(ouod.joyiDparUci·III\=======:!.!. :'p8tJDllothi'll«1Orofthe.ludel'Jt'1iedUCatJDnpl"OCl:'CS.1fYOI1 feelyou .....ouldID.:elobecomepanofthkimpcwuoleducaUoDfeel you would like to become pan of this imponant education assd. please pick up an apphut icn at:uset.. pleut pdup aD appliCltioo.c

llriir=n!!ft'-'!ii~ ~

611 :. I.

Tomah Area School District i;.»20% O F F v i6 , 2 0 1 2 . TransponaiioD OfficeT~"';..':"6~~u;c, find tne Keys to your new nome at ~:fO%OFF~5. A da lm may be IMd al the Ml Rfid the keys toyour new home atIj;SO Towoline ROIld I Any written estimate |I Any written estimate Ile County Coiatnouse, Sparta, w 1550 TowoUnc RoadT WI 5<1660 I WI Bat SpedaUsts Inc. II Wl Bat Specialists inc. iToraah, M 54660

s ince 1979 £•For more infonnatioo, please caU 608-374-7377 • OfficM St3iewi[le ( UN 1 lA %\F«""""w tio.. _aIl608-374-7Jn •Jj.XJ-loOsdorelnus, s iliIIlIUI.homeseUeronll'ne.com i...... .:.:..":'UN •• 'I

M i n a i y 1 4 . 2 0 1 2 '«mCEor~'Tk ....-kt.lo..a... nno I .~::::tnus. ~I I Canada t Meirico • |

101 W. O W Street A M i n a y O w i A m d l www.liomeselleronline.com I • BO 1 fJoL Geo Discovsfv I

S p u t a , Wl 5 4 6 5 6 I •LtttrjicapabilrtiK ^ [E~c..;:::E:~""EEC=~n:.~ I ::~~ I .DI. ........... Ult~--.To-A..,~..... tMI.JU.,.l ~ I uPto1J1lft. I60e-Ze»-12D0 ' tiptoi2eft spB

Bar Number l o o a o i e ~s-c.:=:~n.:-~----"""-'::"~ '-------...,..-- --lI~&Q.8.:W:~u~)3/1A15 300S3S82 WNAXLP • 608i781-M11 )

Page 44 of 11Page of 11

6/7/2012file://C:\WINDOWS\Temp\notes87944B\~web2029.htm 6/7/2012file://C:\WINDOWS\Temp\notes87944B\~web2029.htm

Page 55 of 111Page of 1

file://C:\WINDOWS\Temp\notes87944B\~web2029 .htm 6/7/2012file://C:\WINDOWS\Temp\notes87944B\~web2029.htm 6/7/2012

Page of 1Page 66 of 111

6/7/2012file://C:\WINDOWS\file://C:\WINDOWS\Temp\notes87944B\~web2029.htmTemp\notes87944B\~web2029.htm 6/7/2012