Thesis Talk - Neal

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/6/2019 Thesis Talk - Neal

    1/26

    Distinguishability of Hyper-

    entangled Bell states

    Neal PisentiProfessor Theresa Lynn (Advisor)

    Physics Department, Harvey Mudd College

  • 8/6/2019 Thesis Talk - Neal

    2/26

    Teleportation in SyFy?

  • 8/6/2019 Thesis Talk - Neal

    3/26

    Teleportation in SyFy?

  • 8/6/2019 Thesis Talk - Neal

    4/26

    Bell-State

    Measurement

    What can go wrong in

    quantum teleportation?

  • 8/6/2019 Thesis Talk - Neal

    5/26

    What could go wrong?

    We aren't able to make a completeBell-state measurement!!

    My thesis: What is the upper bound on Bell-statedistinguishability using linear evolution, local

    measurement devices?

  • 8/6/2019 Thesis Talk - Neal

    6/26

    Entanglement

    When two particles know their relationship to each

    other better than they know their own states...

  • 8/6/2019 Thesis Talk - Neal

    7/26

  • 8/6/2019 Thesis Talk - Neal

    8/26

    Entanglement variables...

    Spins of an electron?

    Polarization states of a photon?

    discrete linear momentum states,pairs of orbital angular momentum states, orANY two-level system!

    ?

  • 8/6/2019 Thesis Talk - Neal

    9/26

    4 Bell states for each variable

    thus...

    4n hyper-entangledBell states in n variables!

    Hyper-entangled Bell states?

  • 8/6/2019 Thesis Talk - Neal

    10/26

    Bell-State

    Measurement

    What can go wrong in

    quantum teleportation?

  • 8/6/2019 Thesis Talk - Neal

    11/26

    2n+1 single-particleinput states

    2n+1 single-detectoroutput states

  • 8/6/2019 Thesis Talk - Neal

    12/26

    2n+1 single-particleinput states

    2n+1 single-detectoroutput states

  • 8/6/2019 Thesis Talk - Neal

    13/26

    Bell-state distinguishability comes

    from the seconddetector firing!

    Hence, there can be at most 2n+1 distinguishablemeasurement classes, one for each second-detector

    event.

    But, forn = 1 and n = 2, shown computationally that thereare really only 2n+1 - 1 classes.

    Does this hold for larger values ofn ??

  • 8/6/2019 Thesis Talk - Neal

    14/26

  • 8/6/2019 Thesis Talk - Neal

    15/26

    How about looking for some

    symmetries?

  • 8/6/2019 Thesis Talk - Neal

    16/26

  • 8/6/2019 Thesis Talk - Neal

    17/26

    Let's propose some hypothetical detectionsignature that is anti-symmetric with this:

  • 8/6/2019 Thesis Talk - Neal

    18/26

  • 8/6/2019 Thesis Talk - Neal

    19/26

  • 8/6/2019 Thesis Talk - Neal

    20/26

    0

  • 8/6/2019 Thesis Talk - Neal

    21/26

    Two possible cases:

    is a single detector, say, detector

    OR

    is some superposition of detectors.

  • 8/6/2019 Thesis Talk - Neal

    22/26

    Two possible cases:

    is a single detector, say, detector

    0

    If detectori fires, detectorjwill not fire.

    Thus, there are fewer than 2n+1 possibilities for the seconddetector event, and the best we can do is...

    2n+1

    - 1 distinguishable Bell-state classes!

  • 8/6/2019 Thesis Talk - Neal

    23/26

    Two possible cases:

    is some superposition of detectors.

    ... 0

  • 8/6/2019 Thesis Talk - Neal

    24/26

    Results

    Proved for general n that we can only distinguish between

    2n+1 - 1 Bell states out of 4n total.

    Provided a new, intuitive understanding of the distinguishabilitylimits based on symmetries in the detection signatures.

    Also proved that there is a minimum Bell-state class size for anygiven detection signature:

    No fewer than 2n Bell states if a detector fires twice.No fewer than 2n-1 Bell states if two distinct detectors fire.

  • 8/6/2019 Thesis Talk - Neal

    25/26

    Acknowledgements

    Professor Theresa Lynn Comrades-in-arms:

    o DK, Greg, Julien, Robert Dmitri Skjorshammer

    Professor Orrison Philipp Gaebler

  • 8/6/2019 Thesis Talk - Neal

    26/26

    Questions?