Upload
lamkien
View
218
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Cogeneration and
Thermal Chillers ..
ASHRAE National Capital Chapter.
Arlington, VA10/10/2012
Agenda
• Cogeneration Interest and Application Basics
• Equipment Matching
• Thermal Chiller Overview
• Steam Components & Turbines
Definition
• Cogeneration / Distributed Energy ‐Generation of electrical power on a users site to provide/supplement utility power, by the use of natural gas, coal, oil, wood products, etc., as an energy source.
Basic CoGeneration
Fuel Source
Fuel Source
‐ OR ‐
Boiler SteamSteam Turbine
Engine Generator
Generator
A.
B.
Fuel Application
1. What fuels could be used for Example A ?
2. What fuels may be used for Example B ?
3. Which example is most efficient in changing Fuel BTU’s into KW ?
4. Which should be used for a given site ?
Definition
• Combined Heat & Power (CHP) –Cogeneration with heat recovery, designed to achieve a useful thermal balance with the combined power generation and heat recovery. Topping Cycle (Brayton Cycle)
The Executive Summary August 2012 Publication
‐
Combined Heat and Power
A Clean Energy Solution
Combined heat and power (CHP) is an efficient and clean approach to generating electric power and useful thermal energy from a single fuel source. Instead of purchasing electricity from the distribution grid and burning fuel in an on‐site furnace or boiler to produce thermal energy, an industrial or commercial facility can use CHP to provide both energy services in one energy‐efficient step. The average efficiency of power generation in the United States has remained at 34 percent since the 1960s — the energy lost in wastedheat from power generation in the U.S. is greater than the total energy use of Japan.
CHP captures this waste energy and uses it to provide heating and cooling to factories and businesses, saving them money and improving the environment. CHP is a commercially available clean energy solution that directly addresses a number of national priorities including improving the competitiveness of U.S. manufacturing, increasing energy efficiency, reducing emissions, enhancing our energy infrastructure, improving energy security and growing our economy.
While CHP has been in use in the United States in some form or another for more than 100 years, it remains an underutilized resource today. CHP currently represents approximately 8 percent of U.S. generating capacity compared to over 30 percent in countries such as Denmark, Finland and the Netherlands.
http://www1.eere.energy.gov/manufacturing/distributedenergy/pdfs/chp_clean_energy_solution.pdf
District Energy . org
The International District Energy Association (IDEA) commends the White House for issuing an Executive Order, "Accelerating Investment in Industrial Energy Efficiency," which calls for greater deployment of combined heat and power (CHP) as a means to increase energy efficiency, reduce energy intensity and strengthen US manufacturing and industrial output.
IDEA President & CEO Robert Thornton stated, “We applaud the Administration’s leadership in urging our industry to work together to add 40 gigawatts of new CHP capacity by 2020. CHP is a proven, cost‐effective approach to harnessing both useful heat and power from a single fuel source, leading to higher efficiencies, lower energy costs and reduced emissions – a triple win for the US economy.”
ACEEE – American Council for an Energy‐Efficient Economy
September 19, 2012Combined Heat and Power Could Replace up to 100% of Retiring Coal Plant Capacity in States across the Country
Coal‐powered generation is becoming increasingly uneconomic due to several factors: the increased cost of coal; the decreased cost of alternatives like natural gas; an aging and inefficient coal fleet; and the impact of new and forthcoming air quality regulations, which aim to reduce toxic pollutants and other substances harmful to human health and the environment. An estimated 2 to 5 percent of U.S. electric‐generating capacity will retire due to the above impacts, most of it in the form of older and smaller coal plants that were built over two generations ago.
Back to Basics
CHP = Energy usage to the OINK
Where will the Energy for CHP come from?
• Coal?• Oil?• Gas?• Wood?
• All of the above, and more.
• ASHRAE Publications
• Application Guide for Absorption Cooling/ Refrigeration Using Recovered Heat ‐ Product Code 90378
• Cogeneration Design Guide – Product Code 90392
• Fundamentals of Steam System Design – Product Code 98030
Combined Heat & Power-- CHP --
Design Principle:
“A Generator is a60% Efficient Boilerwith Free Electricity”
19
Thermally-Activated Cooling Technologies
Distributed GenerationTechnologies
I.C. Engine- Jacket / Exhaust -
Double-EffectAbsorption
Chiller
Microturbine- Exhaust -
Solid Oxide Fuel Cell
I.C. Engine- Jacket / Exhaust -
Single-Effect Absorption Chiller Desiccant
Technology
190ºF
360ºF
800ºF
600ºF Steam Turbine Centrifugal Chiller
Technology MatchPower Generation / Thermal Cooling
Gas-turbine
Turbine Generator
20
CHP Prime Movers
• Combustion Turbines 0.5– 10 MW• Microturbines 30 – 250 kW • IC Engines 30 kW – 5 MW• Fuel Cells 200 kW – 1 MW
• 65% ‐ 50% WASTE HEAT• 25% ‐ 40% Electricity
Combustion turbines (CT) provide high volume, high quality heat and are typically over 1 MW in size providing the most thermal energy volume.
Internal combustion engines (IC) provide high volumes of medium quality heat.
Micro turbines (MT) provide high volumes of low quality heat and are grouped together to provide sufficient waste heat.
1300 to 6130 KW Busbar Output$ 1,600,000 to $ 5,600,000 Installed Cost
240 to 4750 KW Busbar Output$ 230,000 to $ 2,900,000 Installed Cost
50 to 300 KW Busbar Output$ 120,000 to $ 550,000 Installed Cost
Selection of a generator - is often dependent on the characteristics of a technology at a particular size – all systems suffer a loss of efficiency as the size is reduced.
•Large CHP sites (over 1 MW) generally use combustion turbines.
•Medium sites (250 kW – 2 MW) use IC engines predominantly.
•Small sites under 250 kW required output use either IC engines or microturbines.
Generator Thermal Output
• Simple Cycle Combustion Turbine:High Volume, High Temp Exhaust (900 – 1000°F)
• Recuperated Microturbine:High Volume, Medium Temp Exhaust (500 – 600°F)
• IC Engine:Low Volume, High Temp Exhaust (900 – 1000°F)+ Hot Water (200 – 220°F)
• Fuel Cell (SOFC):Low Volume, Medium Temp Exhaust (600 – 700°F)
Break Period
Next – Thermal Chillers
25
Steam Turbine Chillers
• High & Low Temperature Activation, 307 – 600 F• High & Low Pressure Steam System, 60 – 300 psig• High Efficiency
700 to 5,000 Tons
Efficiency – 1.25 COP,
Compact footprint
High IPLV Efficiency – 1.8 COP
Condenser Water 3 GPM, 55 F
Chilled Water to 36 F
26
Absorption Chillers
Single Effect:• Low Temperature Activation, 180 - 260 F•Steam or Hot Water• Low Cost• Simple• Good Efficiency – 0.71 COP
Wide range of models from <100 tons to >1,500 tons
Chilled Water down to 38F
3.3 to 4.5 GPM Condenser Water, < 70 F
Large & Heavy, Slower Response
Double Effect:• High Temperature Activation, 350°F •Steam or Direct Fired• Higher Cost• More Complex• High Efficiency – 1.3 COP
Example ‐ 1,500 Tons (3,500 kW) • Two‐stage absorption chiller is about 360 ft² (33.4 m²), 115,000lb (54430kg)
• Centrifugal steam‐turbine chiller 190 ft² (17.7 m²), 84,000lb (38,180kg) • Equals 90% larger footprint , and 37% more weight for absorption
10 ft
19 ft
30 ft
12 ftSteam
TurbineCentrifugal
Absorption
Footprint - Two-Stage Absorber Chiller vs. Centrifugal Chiller
Single Effect Absorber
IC Engine
Steam Turbine
Double Effect Absorber
100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0
IPLV 1.8
IPLV 1.5
2.0
1.0
1.5
2.5
0.5
0.0
Effic
ienc
y (C
OP)
Percent Load
IPLV 0.9
Part Load Efficiency
Electric motor driven centrifugal 6.10 1.53
ELECTRIC CENTRIFUGAL CHILLER COPSITE
COPSOURCE
THERMAL CHILLERS COP SITE
COPSOURCE
Absorption ChillersSingle stage 0.71 0.64Two stage direct fired 1.00 0.91Two stage steam fired 1.30 1.19
Steam Turbine Driven Centrifugal Chiller 1.25 1.15
Gas Engine Driven Centrifugal Chiller 2.10 1.97
30
CHP Plant SizeAverage output of a based CHP plant. Electric efficiencies vary for each
generator type but do not impact CHP efficiency
CHP System
Ther
mal
Te
chno
logy
Effe
ctiv
e Si
ze
Ran
ge
CH
P O
utpu
t Ef
ficie
ncy
HH
V
ISO
Ele
ctric
O
utpu
t
Chi
lling
Out
put
@ 4
4 F
& 8
3 F
Nom
inal
Ele
ctric
Ef
ficie
ncy
LHV
Configuration Model kW % kW Tons %
Large Combustion Turbine CHP Turbine 2.5 - 7 77% 4,890 2520 31%Small Combustion Turbine CHP Dbl Abs 1 - 2.5 69% 1,585 984 24%Lg. Microturbine CHP Dbl Abs 0.25 - 0.5 60% 357 160 27%Lg. Reciprocating Engine CHP Dbl Abs 1.5 - 5 50% 2,875 444 37%Sm. Reciprocating Engine CHP Slg Abs 0.25 - 5 58% 1,160 260 35%Sm. Microturbine CHP Slg Abs 0.25 - 0.5 44% 305 81 27%CHP Output Efficiency = (Total busbar kW + Cooling converted directly to kW) / Fuel Input (HHV)
CHP System
Ther
mal
Te
chno
logy
Effe
ctiv
e Si
ze
Ran
ge
Ther
mal
-Ele
ctric
R
atio
CH
P O
utpu
t Ef
ficie
ncy
HH
V
Configuration Model kW T/kW %
Large Combustion Turbine CHP Turbine 2.5 - 7 0.6 77%Small Combustion Turbine CHP Dbl Abs 1 - 2.5 0.7 69%Lg. Microturbine CHP Dbl Abs 0.25 - 0.5 0.5 60%Lg. Reciprocating Engine CHP Dbl Abs 1.5 - 5 0.2 50%Sm. Reciprocating Engine CHP Sgl Abs 0.25 - 5 0.3 58%Sm. Microturbine CHP Sgl Abs 0.25 - 0.5 0.4 44%
31
CHP Efficiency
• CHP Output Efficiency is generally higher for Combustion Turbine based CHP system than IC Engine based systems.
CHP Output Efficiency = (Total busbar kW + Cooling converted directly to kW) / Fuel Input (HHV)
Gas Heating Values
• Low Heating Value (LHV) Excludes the latent heat of condensation
• High Heating Value (HHV) Includes the latent heat of condensation
• LHV = 0.9 x HHV
Ambient Air
Exhaust
Hot Water
IC Generator with Jacket Water Heat Recovery
Building Air Handling
Unit’s
Chilled WaterSingle Stage Absorber
CHP with Recovered Hot Water
Water Return
Jacket Water HR
Heat Recovery Steam or Hot Water Generator
Ambient Air
Exhaust
Steam or Hot Water
IC Engine Generator with Jacket Water and Exhaust Heat RecoveryBuilding Air
Handling Unit’s
Duct Burner
Chilled Water
Two Stage Absorber or
Single Stage Absorber
CHP with Recovered Med. to Low Pressure Steam or Hot Water
Condensate / Water Return
Jacket Water HR
Exhaust HR
Heat Recovery Steam GeneratorCombustion
Turbine Inlet Air Cooling
GeneratorAmbient Air
Exhaust
Steam
Combustion Turbine
Building Air Handling
Unit’s
Duct Burner
Chilled Water
Ste
am C
onde
nsat
e
Steam Turbine Chiller or
Two Stage Absorber
CHP with Recovered Steam
AIR INLETFILTER
DIVERTERVALVEs
GASTURBINE
GENERATOR
EXHAUSTBYPASSSILENCER
SUPPLE‐MENTARYBURNER
HEATRECOVERYSTEAMGENERATOR(HRSG)
PROCESSSTEAM
Combustion/Gas Turbine CHP System
Gas Turbine
Inlet Air Cooling
38
University ApplicationHigh Efficiency CHP System with High Thermal Output
Fuel SupplyDump
Condenser
InletAir
Cooling
Duct Burner
Chilled WaterSupply/Return
CombustionTurbine
GeneratorSteamTurbineChillers
Condensate Return
Steam Supply
CoolingTowers
Heat RecoverySteam Generator
MainStackBypass
Stack
Steam HeatSupply/Return Fig. Taurus 60 / Steam Turbine CHP System
2800 Steam Turbine Centrifugal
CT
Heat Recovery Steam GeneratorCombustion
Turbine Inlet Air Cooling
GeneratorAmbient Air
Exhaust
Steam
Combustion Turbine
Duct burner
Chi
lled
Wat
er
Ste
am C
onde
nsat
e
Steam Turbine Generator
CHP with Recovered Steam
Engine Driven Centrifugal
or Direct Fired Absorber
Next ‐ Steam Components & Turbines
Break PeriodBreak Period
Turbine Talk
• Exhausting Turbines / Back Pressure Positive Pressure Exhaust
• Condensing TurbinesNegative Exhaust Pressure
• Common Applications (rotating equipment)Generators, Chillers, Pumps
Condensing
Turbine
Steam Exhaust 112 F
Steam Inlet375 F
Nozzle Valves
Lower Arc of Emission
Turbine Section
End-milled diaphragm (stationary segment), without vanes
Page 51
Condensing Turbine Steam SystemExhaust Trunk
Surface Condenser
Turbine
Speed
Steam SupplyLevel
Condensate ReturnCondensate Pump
Vacuum Pump
Air (at start)Wet Steam
Steam Surface CondenserExhaustSteam
Condenser Pump
Vacuum Pump
CoolingWaterIn
LevelControl
Condensate Out