Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
11/10/2012
1
© 2012 The Actuarial Profession www.actuaries.org.uk
Life Conference 2012 Paul Fulcher, Nomura International & Simon Richards, Insight Investment
There’s more to Life than Solvency II
Brussels, November 2012
Solvency II myopia
1 © 2012 The Actuarial Profession www.actuaries.org.uk
• MIFID
• Basel III
• Dodd-Frank
• Recovery and Resolution
Directive
• Wheatley review
• Liikanen review
11/10/2012
2
Are insurers Systematically Important Financial Institutions?
2 © 2012 The Actuarial Profession www.actuaries.org.uk
“Financial institutions which typically demonstrate a high
degree of leverage, liquidity or maturity mismatch or
financial interconnectedness can transmit, and often
amplify, shocks arising elsewhere in the financial system”
• Central clearing
• Discounting
• Other issues (including CVA)
Central clearing and related issues
11/10/2012
3
Catalyst for change: September 2008
4
The line in the sand
Increase market transparency, reduce counterparty risk and systemic risk
G20 commitment
“All standardised OTC
derivative contracts should be
traded on exchanges or
electronic trading platforms,
where appropriate, and
cleared through central
counterparties by end-2012 at
latest. OTC derivatives
contracts should be reported to
trade repositories.
Noncentrally cleared contracts
should be subject to higher
capital requirements.”
5
11/10/2012
4
The scale of the ambition
US GDP
$15tn
Exchange
traded derivatives
$83tn
OTC derivatives
$708tn
Sources: Insight (March 2012), and Bank for International Settlements (November 2011)
6
EMIR covers more than just mandatory clearing
Mandatory
clearing
• Requirement to clear
certain derivative
transactions
• Pension business of
Insurers has a
temporary exemption
New non-cleared
requirements
• Increased collateral
requirements
• Likely requirement to
post initial margin as
well as variation margin
• Minimum operational
standards
• Applies to all
Insurance business
Reporting
• Report all derivative
contracts to Trade
Repositories
• Applies to all
Insurance business
7
11/10/2012
5
Changes from OTC clearing
© 2010 The Actuarial Profession www.actuaries.org.uk
Current structure Future structure
• Post trade risk management not execution
• End user still trades with chosen bank counterparty (Cpty)
• Transfer trade to clearing member who registers it at a CCP
End
user
Cpty
A
Cpty
C
Cpty
B
CCP
End
user
CM CM
End
user
CM CM
End
user
End
user
8
Changes from OTC clearing contd.
9 © 2010 The Actuarial Profession www.actuaries.org.uk
Current position Expected centrally
cleared
Expected non-
cleared regime
Legal
agreements
ISDA/CSA with each
counterparty.
Need documentation with
each counterparty and a
clearing member bank
(CM) to access clearing
house (maybe >1 CM)
Need documentation with
each counterparty
Initial margin Typically none Only cash or gilts Flexible
Variation
margin
Varies; typically cash and
gilts
Only cash Flexible
Default risk Exposed to default of the
counterparty you trade
with
Directly affected only if
your CM defaults
Loss mitigated by initial
margin
Back-up CM
recommended
Exposed to default of the
counterparty you trade
with
Loss mitigated by initial
margin
11/10/2012
6
Value added?
10 © 2010 The Actuarial Profession www.actuaries.org.uk
Potential benefits Potential disadvantages
Provides a range of protection in
case of default
Likely to increase cost and reduce
returns
Greater regulatory transparency,
may help regulators detect systemic
risk build up
Interest rate swaps likely to be
cleared, but inflation swaps not
likely to be cleared initially
- reduces possibility of netting
margin between the two
All trades going through a limited
number of CM enables more
opportunities to net margin calls
Only cash variation margin accepted
by clearing houses
- insurers and pension schemes
generally don’t hold significant cash
Political need for regulators to be seen
to take action
Less flexibility from a requirement to
deliver initial margin
What next?
• Increased costs (both
direct and indirect)
• Opportunity cost of
increased and new collateral
requirement
• Reduced flexibility
• Liquidity costs
• Splitting of netting sets
• Asset allocation
• Repo and collateral
financing
• Synthesising assets
• Tactical, strategic and
structural solutions
• New documentation
• Reporting and disclosure
• Appointing clearing agents
• Developing appropriate
client models with clearers
Strategy & Innovation Cost Implementation
11
11/10/2012
7
• Central clearing
• Discounting
• Other issues (including CVA)
OTC Derivatives
12
CSA discounting
© 2010 The Actuarial Profession www.actuaries.org.uk
• Traditional method of swap valuation: 6m Libor swap curve
• Market moving to: CSA discounting
What does this mean?
• Derivatives are valued based on the cost of posting collateral
• Normally based on overnight index swaps (OIS)
• Some CSAs allow wider collateral
13
11/10/2012
8
Why the move to CSA/OIS discounting?
© 2010 The Actuarial Profession www.actuaries.org.uk
• LIBOR was previously recognised as bank funding rate
• No longer the case
• Unpredictable and slow to react
• Reactive to credit concerns
• Derivatives contracts which give rise to loans
• Collateral at heart of risk management
• Cost of collateral more closely aligned to OIS
• LCH moved to OIS in July 2010 following most major banks
14
Why does this matter?
© 2010 The Actuarial Profession www.actuaries.org.uk
Existing positions
• Insurers/Pension fund’s swaps are typically ITM – increase
to valuation
• Greater focus on CSAs
Future balance sheet
• Solvency II currently uses a 6m Libor curve
– Creates a basis exposure for insurers hedging using
swaps valued off OIS
• Potentially similar issue for pension funds using swaps
valuation
15
11/10/2012
9
Managing the exposure
16 © 2010 The Actuarial Profession www.actuaries.org.uk
Re-coupon swaps
• Exposure greater for ITM/OTM swaps
Hedge the exposure
• OIS-LIBOR basis swaps
OIS – the future for interest rate swaps?
• Increasing demand for OIS as floating leg
• Liquidity developing
• Solvency II?
• Central clearing
• Discounting
• Other issues (including CVA)
OTC Derivatives
11/10/2012
10
Basel III/CRD IV
• Capital Requirement Directive IV sets up risk management
framework for banks potentially impacting OTC derivatives
– Likely to be delayed from target of 1 January 2013
– CVA charges for OTC derivatives transactions
– Impact of CVA charges likely to be minimal where initial
margin is required in the new regime
– Pension business of insurers may be exempt from CVA
charges
18
CVA charging
• Credit Value Adjustment (CVA charge) takes account of counterparty
risk in assessing cost of capital
• Default Value Adjustment (DVA charge) which is an allowance for the
institution’s own risk of fault that can offset the CVA charge
• Bank should adjust trade price for CVA charge to reflect counterparty
risk of client and arguably offset DVA charge to represent own
counterparty risk
– Cost of trading increases for more risky counterparty and reduces
for less risky counterparty
– Impact greatest for long maturity contracts (e.g. may be 1.5-2bp for
20 year interest rate swap)
19
11/10/2012
11
Bank deleveraging
20 © 2012 The Actuarial Profession www.actuaries.org.uk
Clouds on the banking horizon
© 2012 The Actuarial Profession www.actuaries.org.uk
Basel III Sovereign
Stress
Concentration
of exposure Commitments to
capital providers
Return on
Risk Capital
State-aid
penalties
Source: Nomura 21
11/10/2012
12
The bank crisis-sovereign crisis
© 2012 The Actuarial Profession www.actuaries.org.uk Source: OECD
Losses on holdings of sovereign debt
Reduction in the value of collateral
Potential credit rating downgrades
Reduced value of explicit/implicit guarantees Banks
weakening Sovereigns weakening
Deleveraging pressures detrimental to real
activity
Bank failures reduce investor base
Increase in sovereign outlays, actual and
potential liabilities
Negative feedback on sovereigns
Negative feedback on banks
22
Basel III capital changes
© 2012 The Actuarial Profession www.actuaries.org.uk
Source: Deutsche Bundesbank
2.00%
3.50% 4.00% 4.50% 4.50% 4.50% 4.50% 4.50%
2.00%
1.00%
1.50% 1.50% 1.50% 1.50% 1.50% 1.50%
4.00% 3.50% 2.50% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00%
0.625% 1.25%
1.875% 2.50%
0.625%
1.25%
1.875%
2.50%
0
4
8
12
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Common Equity Tier 1 Additional Tier 1 capital Tier 2 capital Capital Conservation Buffer Countercyclical Buffer
Restrictions
• Loss absorbency of capital
• Capital deductions (eg pension deficits)
• G-SIFI surcharge
23
11/10/2012
13
Basel III – other key areas
© 2012 The Actuarial Profession www.actuaries.org.uk
• Liquidity and net stable funding ratios
• Limits on leverage ratios
• Increase to capital charges – including CVAs
24
7.9%
4.9% 2.6%
4.2%
-1.4%
100.0%
118.2%
95%
100%
105%
110%
115%
120%
125%
Pre CCR tradingbook threshold 50/50 other Post
Changes in RWA
Source: BCBS
Banks responses
25 © 2012 The Actuarial Profession www.actuaries.org.uk
Capital strengthening
Change in funding mix
Optimisation of capital methodologies
Reduction in new origination of loans and run-off of certain sectors
Outright sale of legacy loan positions
11/10/2012
14
Sources of deleveraging
26 © 2012 The Actuarial Profession www.actuaries.org.uk
Source: IMF
Asset classes available
© 2012 The Actuarial Profession www.actuaries.org.uk
Source: Deloitte
€0bn
€2bn
€4bn
€6bn
€8bn
€10bn
€12bn
€14bn
€16bn
Consumer Loans Asset Financing Commercial Real Estate
Residential Mortgages Corporate Loans
Composition of portfolio transactions in 2011
27
11/10/2012
15
Role for Insurers?
© 2012 The Actuarial Profession www.actuaries.org.uk
Banks won’t realise losses
Need expertise
“Shadow-banking”
Solvency II
Liquidity Swaps
New Origination
Excess liquidity
Dearth of
opportunities
Long-dated
secured
cashflows
28
More natural buyers
A final thought….
29 © 2012 The Actuarial Profession www.actuaries.org.uk
11/10/2012
16
Questions or comments?
Expressions of individual views by
members of The Actuarial Profession
and its staff are encouraged.
The views expressed in this presentation
are those of the presenter.
30 © 2012 The Actuarial Profession www.actuaries.org.uk
31 © 2010 The Actuarial Profession www.actuaries.org.uk
Regulatory timetable
Jul 2010
Ju
l 20
11
A
ug
20
12
EMIR
Dodd-Frank
Basel III
Oct 2010 Jan 2011 Apr 2011
Oct 2011 Jan 2012 Apr 2012 Jul 2012
Dodd-Frank act SEC proposes rules regarding
systemically important clearing agencies
Agreement on Basel
Committee reform package
CRD IV proposals FED:
US substantially all Basel III rules
EU Trilogue
begins
Compromise
published
Approved EMIR
text released
Dec 2012
Clearing requirements finalised
Q1 2013
Clearing requirements implemented
Mid-end 2014
MiFID
Parliament
approves draft
Commission publishes
first EMIR proposal
Clearing requirement
regulations approved
Summer 2012
SEC gives up web schedule
Nov 2012 (postponed from Jun)
Indicative plenary sitting for CRD IV
Aug 2012
EMIR enters into force
Q2 2013
Rules for non-cleared trades
11/10/2012
17
References / further reading
© 2012 The Actuarial Profession www.actuaries.org.uk
HM Treasury (2012), White Paper on Banking Reform http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/d/whitepaper_banking_reform_140512.pdf
International Monetary Fund (2012), Global Financial Stability Report, April 2012 http://www.imf.org/External/Pubs/FT/GFSR/2012/01/pdf/text.pdf
Stanworth et al (2005), How Valuable is Liquidity, report of Liquidity Working Party http://www.actuaries.org.uk/research-and-resources/documents/how-valuable-liquidity-liquidity-working-party-report
OECD (2012), Implicit Guarantees for Bank Debt: Where Do We Stand? http://www.oecd.org/finance/financialmarkets/50586138.pdf
BCBS (2012), Results of the Basel III monitoring exercise as of 31 December 2011 http://www.bis.org/publ/bcbs231.pdf
Bank of England (2012), The dog and the frisbee http://www.bankofengland.co.uk/publications/Documents/speeches/2012/speech596.pdf
32